Next Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol in Rat Brain Tissue After Single-Dose Administration of Different Formulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Engineered Cr-In/H-SSZ-39 Catalyst for Enhanced Performance in CH4-SCR of NOx
Previous Article in Journal
Catalytic Innovations in the Aza-Michael Reaction: An Experimental Benchmarking Focused on Sustainable Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimized Solar-Simulated Photocatalysis of Congo Red Dye Using TiO2: Toward a Sustainable Water Treatment Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Pathway for Sugar Production from Agricultural Waste Catalyzed by Sulfonated Magnetic Carbon Microspheres

1
Dali Tobacco Bureau of Yunnan Province, Dali 671000, China
2
School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2025, 30(13), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132675
Submission received: 9 April 2025 / Revised: 31 May 2025 / Accepted: 17 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterogeneous Catalysis for Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality)

Abstract

:
Lignocellulose is an important renewable biomass resource. However, at present, there is a lack of efficient and environmentally friendly catalytic systems that can selectively convert lignocellulose components into high-value sugars, and the value realization of agricultural waste (such as straw) remains challenging. Carbon-based solid acids are used in the valorization of biomass due to their simple preparation and excellent catalytic performance. In this study, the magnetic carbon microspheres catalyst was prepared using concentrated sulfuric acid and hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid as sulfonating agents. Two sulfonation catalysts were applied to the hydrolysis of typical agricultural waste (rice straw). The performance of catalyst conversion to reducing sugar was compared, and the glucose yield was lower than 30%. The sulfonation catalyst of hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid obtained a higher yield of pentose (76.67%) than that of concentrated sulfuric acid (74.25%) in 110 min. The optimal reaction conditions were found: substrate was 0.04 g straw, catalyst was 0.04 g, H2O/γ-valerolactone ratio was 8:2 in the solvent, and the reaction time was 110 min at 140 °C. Under these conditions, the sulfonation properties of hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid as a green sulfonating agent are similar to those of concentrated sulfuric acid. Its excellent catalytic performance is attributed to the medium B/L acid density ratio on the catalyst surface. In addition, the prepared catalyst can be effectively separated from the reaction residue in the catalytic system. This work provides a green catalytic system for the high-value utilization of agricultural waste from renewable carbon sources.

1. Introduction

With the development of society, resource issues have emerged as a major topic that humanity needs to address urgently. For the increasing demands of human life, the non-renewable resources of traditional fossil fuels will gradually be depleted [1]. Moreover, burning fossil fuels emits large amounts of carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases, and particulate matter [2,3]. This makes the greenhouse effects worse. Consequently, an increasing number of new renewable energy sources are being developed and utilized [4,5]. Among them, biomass energy stands out as the energy stored in biomass, primarily obtained through the process of photosynthesis in plants. Biomass, serving as an energy carrier, mainly exists in the form of organic carbon found in vegetation, aquatic plants, agricultural residues, and organic waste [6]. It is an important source for producing biomass-based fuel and chemicals [7,8]. Approximately 170 billion tons of biomass resources are generated globally each year, but only 3% is used as energy, accounting for 14% of the world’s total energy consumption [9]. Therefore, improving the utilization efficiency of biomass resources can greatly meet human energy needs and mitigate the impact of fossil fuel shortages on humanity.
Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant and renewable biomass resource [10,11]. It is crucial for replacing traditional methods in fuel and basic chemical production. Lignocellulosic biomass is widely found in agricultural residues such as corn stover, bagasse, rice straw, and corn cobs. Additionally, there is a large amount of lignocellulosic biomass in forestry by-products such as pine wood and sawdust [12,13]. These materials are rich in organic matter and various mineral elements. Lignocellulosic biomass is primarily composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Each substance can be utilized differently to produce fuels or chemicals such as ethanol and furfural [14,15,16]. Differences in their chemical composition and structure lead to variations in their reactivity. The predominant component, cellulose, can be hydrolyzed to produce glucose, which can then be fermented by yeast to produce ethanol. Additionally, dehydration of glucose can yield platform chemicals such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural [17]. It is estimated that nearly half of the organic carbon in the biosphere exists in the form of cellulose [18,19]. Hemicellulose can be hydrolyzed to produce xylose and arabinose, which can be further processed to produce xylitol [20]. Structurally, cellulose forms microfibrils that constitute the basic framework of plant cell walls with hemicellulose acting as an adhesive and lignin as a filler. The different binding forces among these molecules result in a highly recalcitrant structure, making the hydrolysis of lignocellulose particularly challenging [21].
Heterogeneous catalysts are widely used in the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass [22,23]. Carbon-based solid acids garner particular attention because of their simple preparation and excellent performance [24]. The preparation methods of carbon-based solid acid mainly include the carbonization method, sulfonation method, oxidation method, etc. Among them, the sulfonation method uses a sulfonation reagent to react with functional groups such as hydroxyl groups on the surface of carbon-based materials to produce acidic functional groups such as sulfonic acid groups [25]. Compared with similar catalysts, sulfonated carbon materials prepared by the sulfonation method show excellent selectivity in catalytic process, reducing sugar production. They not only have higher efficiency but also cause less damage to the pore structure [26]. Thus, the catalyst is endowed with a larger specific surface area and a higher sulfonic acid group density, which improves the performance of the catalyst. This material has a chemical function of high stability and selectivity under optimal conditions [27]. Bai et al. successfully prepared several carbon-based solid acids from various biomass sources (glucose, microcrystalline cellulose, bamboo, and rice husk). These unique acids were then employed as catalysts to catalyze cellulose hydrolysis. Using a ball-milling method and dissolving cellulose in ionic liquids, they achieved a maximum total reducing sugar yield of 81.8% [28]. Through the sulfonation of a carbon catalyst, the catalytic effect of biomass can be significantly improved. Weerasai et al. synthesized solid sulfonated carbon-based catalysts from three carbon precursors (sucrose, glucose, and xylose). Alkaline oxidation pretreatment of biomass increased the reducing sugar yield (up to 40.7%) under specific conditions. Besides biomass pretreatment, sulfonated carbon-based solid acids can further enhance lignocellulose conversion [29]. Qi et al. synthesized a novel carbon-based solid (C-SO3H) acid catalyst using a one-step hydrothermal carbonization method with microcrystalline cellulose and sulfuric acid. Under optimal pretreatment conditions (140 °C, 6 h, 0.25 g corn cobs, 0.25 g catalyst, and 25 mL H2O), they achieved a xylose yield of 78.1% [30]. Xu et al. prepared catalyst materials by a carbonized and sulfonated mixture of glucose and p-toluene sulfonic acid and enhanced the acidity with 30% H2O2 oxidation. The catalyst resulted in a xylose yield of 78% from corn cobs hydrolysis [31]. Sulfonated carbon-based solid acids exhibit high catalytic activity in the catalytic production of sugar from biomass [32,33]. However, using carbon-based solid acids as catalysts in hydrolysis systems presents a significant challenge: the direct separation of the catalyst from the solid residues produced after lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis.
In this study, the sulfonated magnetic carbon microsphere materials were prepared by two steps. The resulting sulfonated magnetic carbon microsphere materials were applied to directly catalyze the hydrolysis of rice straw to reducing sugars, and the yields of glucose and pentose were 22.23% and 76.67%, respectively. Compared with previous studies, hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid was selected as the sulfonating agent in this study, which has higher catalytic activity and selectivity. During the sulfonation process, the generation and emission of harmful substances can be reduced, significantly lowering the discharge of pollutants. Meanwhile, the unique magnetic property enhances the recovery efficiency of the catalyst. Therefore, the magnetic sulfonation catalyst prepared in this study has made remarkable progress in solving the catalyst separation problem in the current hydrolysis system. It also provides new ideas and methods for sustainable utilization in the field of biomass transformation.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of a Carbon-Based Solid Acid Catalyst

The magnetic carbon materials were prepared by hydrothermal treatment. The SEM results of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation are shown in Figure 1. After sulfonation, most carbon microspheres exhibited aggregation, and their surfaces changed from smooth to a raised state, forming an amorphous structure. This indicated an increase in surface functional groups on the magnetic carbon material post-sulfonation, resulting in a completely non-porous and more stable catalyst structure [34]. The EDX image shows the elemental distribution in the catalyst before and after sulfonation, with the S elements showing a uniform distribution in the material after sulfonation. The sulfonated material had a fine grain, and the phase interface was clearer and the phase distribution was more uniform. The size and uniform distribution of the material particle shape were significantly improved before and after sulfonation. Compared to traditional carbon materials, the magnetic carbon material synthesized in this study exhibited a larger specific surface area (Figure 1). This larger specific surface area can provide more active sites for adsorption of reactants. The magnetic carbon materials treated with two different sulfonating agents (Figure 1c–f) showed some damaged microsphere structures. Through statistical analysis of SEM images, it was found that the magnetic carbon material sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid (average diameter 1.33 μm) exhibited smaller microspheres than that sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid (average diameter 1.51 μm). This smaller microsphere morphology may contribute to the diffusion rate of the substrate inside the catalyst, making it easier for the reactants to reach the active site inside the catalyst.
The XRD characterization results of the synthesized material before and after sulfonation are shown in Figure 2a. The magnetic carbon material before sulfonation exhibited characteristic diffraction peaks of Fe3O4 at 2θ values of 30°, 35°, 43°, 57°, and 62° [35,36]. The remaining peaks coincided with the standard peaks of complex carbon-oxygen compounds. After sulfonation, the diffraction peaks of the two catalysts were primarily concentrated in the 10–30° range, all of which were broad peaks corresponding to the characteristic diffraction peak of the C (002) plane. This suggested that the catalysts post-sulfonation exist in the form of amorphous carbon. These findings indicated that the sulfonation reaction not only introduced sulfonic acid groups but also altered the structure of the carbon materials [37]. After sulfonation, the material retained its magnetic properties despite disappearance of the diffraction peaks corresponding to Fe3O4. This implied that Fe3O4 serves as the magnetic core, enveloped by the carbon material, and that the surface-attached free Fe3O4 disappears after sulfonation.
The infrared spectra of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation are shown in Figure 2b. The results indicated that more functional groups were exposed after sulfonation. The stretching vibration peak around 3400 cm−1 corresponded to -OH groups. The peak at 1609–1613 cm−1 corresponded to the stretching vibrations of aromatic C=C bonds. The characteristic peak of the sulfonic acid group appeared in the region of 1000–1400 cm−1. The peak at 1171 cm−1 was attributed to the O=S=O stretching vibrations. This indicates the presence of sulfonic acid groups on the surface of the sample. The peak at 1068 cm−1 was characteristic of -SO3H groups, and the peak at 610 cm−1 corresponded to C-S bending vibrations [38,39]. The C-S bond is the bonding bond between sulfur atoms and carbon atoms in the sulfonic acid group, and its bending vibration further supports the presence of the sulfonic acid group on the sample surface. The characteristic peaks before and after sulfonation of the magnetic carbon materials were compared. It showed that both the magnetic carbon materials sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid and those sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid exhibited an increase in the O=S=O functional groups and -SO3H functional groups on their surfaces. This indicates that sulfonic acid groups were successfully loaded onto the surface of the carbon microspheres, which could facilitate intermolecular dehydration [40]. The characteristic peak intensity of the sulfonic acid group in the spectrum was uniform, showing a narrow shape, and there was no obvious peak splitting or asymmetry. This indicates that the sulfonic acid group was uniformly dispersed on the surface of the sample.
The specific surface area, pore volume, and pore diameter of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation are shown in Table S1. The specific surface area of the two magnetic carbon materials after sulfonation (both <4.7 m2/g) was significantly smaller than that before sulfonation (13.0379 m2/g). This indicates that the surface of the magnetic carbon materials lacks significant pore structures, which was consistent with the SEM characterization [41,42,43]. Figure 2c shows the adsorption-desorption isotherms of the magnetic carbon materials, which is assigned to the characteristics of Type III isotherms [44]. The initial part of the isotherm raised slowly, followed by a sharp increase in adsorption due to capillary condensation in the latter part. However, the adsorption capacity of the magnetic carbon materials did not increase significantly after sulfonation. This phenomenon may be due to the substantial reduction in specific surface area and pore volume, leading to a decreased adsorption capacity. As can be seen from the pore size distribution curve in Figure 2d, the pore sizes of the three magnetic carbon materials were between 2 and 50 nm, corresponding to the mesoporous structure. However, the total pore volume was small, which shows atypical adsorption characteristics of mesoporous materials. The specific surface area and total pore volume of the sulfonated magnetic carbon materials were significantly smaller than those before sulfonation. This proved that sulfonic acid groups were loaded onto the carbon materials, filling the surface pores [45].
The pyridine infrared spectra are shown in Figure 3. The characteristic peaks at 1540–1548 cm−1 corresponded to the pyridine adsorbed on Bronsted acid (B acid) sites, and the peaks at 1445–1454 cm−1 corresponded to the pyridine adsorbed on Lewis acid (L acid) sites. The peak at 1490 cm−1 was attributed to the combination of B acid and L acid sites [46,47]. The Fe3O4@C-S showed a larger peak area at the B acid sites. Fe3O4@C-H presented a larger peak area at the L acid sites. Additionally, the peak areas corresponding to B acid, L acid, and their combination in both sulfonated magnetic carbon materials were significantly larger than the carbon materials before sulfonation. The results indicated that the magnetic carbon materials have enhanced acid catalytic performance after sulfonation. Table 1 shows the acid site densities of B and L acids in the three carbon materials, as well as the B/L ratio, which is the ratio of the acid site densities of B acid to L-acid. The magnetic carbon materials after sulfonation exhibited significantly higher densities of Brønsted (B), Lewis (L), and total acid sites compared with the magnetic carbon materials before sulfonation. The L acid sites were obviously more abundant than the B acid sites in the magnetic carbon materials both before and after sulfonation. Among them, Fe3O4@C-S exhibited the highest amount of B acid. Fe3O4@C-H showed a moderate acid density and the ratio of B/L acid site density.
The pyridine infrared characterization indicates that the Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H catalysts possess significantly more B, L, and total acid sites than Fe3O4@C, implying better catalytic performance. The higher acid site density indicates that there are more acid sites on the catalyst surface for adsorption and conversion of reactants. During hydrolysis reactions, the magnetic carbon material swelled due to water interaction. The internal acid sites came into contact with the substrate and exerted their catalytic effect.

2.2. Catalytic Performance of a Carbon-Based Solid Acid Catalyst

The main components of straw are cellulose and hemicellulose, which are hydrolyzed to produce glucose and pentose, respectively, under the action of solid acid catalysis. To compare the catalytic activity of the catalyst by the two sulfonation methods, rice straw was selected as the hydrolysis substrate, and identical time gradients were set. The yield of reducing sugars from the hydrolysis of rice straw catalyzed by two sulfonated magnetic carbon microspheres were determined. The results are shown in Table 2. The highest glucose yields using Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H were 29.35% and 22.23%, which is relatively low, indicating that the performance of the two catalysts for hydrolyzing cellulose is limited. The hydrolysis efficiency of the concentrated sulfuric acid sulfonation catalyst for cellulose was better than that of hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid sulfonation catalyst, which may be attributed to the higher ratio of B/L acid density on the surface of Fe3O4@C-S promoting the hydrolysis of cellulose. Fe3O4@C-H led to a peak pentose yield of 76.67% in 110 min, which was slightly higher than that of 76.51% in 90 min in the presence of Fe3O4@C-S. This phenomenon is due to the fact that the lower ratio of B/L acid density on the surface of Fe3O4@C-H is conducive to the hydrolysis of hemicellulose. The results indicated that the catalytic properties of Fe3O4@C-H and Fe3O4@C-S in promoting the hydrolysis of hemicellulose into pentose are similar. This suggests that the hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid could be substitute for sulfonation with concentrated sulfuric acid to prepare a carbon-based solid acid with -SO3H, which was used in upgradation of biomass to reducing sugar. As a green sulfonating agent, the hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid could be applied to replace the concentrated sulfuric acid, which would mitigate the environmental pollution. Compared with the previous research on sulfonated carbon catalysis, the preparation method of the catalyst has been innovated in this paper. The sulfonation degree and stability of the catalyst were effectively improved by adopting a more environmentally friendly sulfonation method. Therefore, research on catalysts sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid is significantly important and valuable. During the sulfonation process, the hydroxyl group in hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid could introduce sulfonic groups into the magnetic carbon material. This allows for the incorporation of a sufficient number of acidic active sites, thereby achieving a sulfonation effect similar to that of concentrated sulfuric acid [48].
According to the above results, the catalyst for sulfonation of hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid was used as the catalyst object. The optimum experimental conditions for catalytic rice straw production of reducing sugar were studied. For multiple parameters (reaction time, temperature, solvent ratio, catalyst amount), we used single-factor experiments. The impact of catalyst dosage on the reaction is illustrated in Figure 4a. The magnetic carbon microsphere catalyst was sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid in the following amounts: 0.02 g, 0.04 g, 0.06 g, and 0.08 g. The rice straw was used as a substrate at 140 °C for 110 min. The highest yields of glucose and pentose sugars were obtained with catalyst dosages of 0.04 g. Increasing the amount of catalyst in the range of 0–0.04 g can significantly improve the yield, possibly because more active sites are provided. When the dosage is greater than 0.04 g, the decrease in yield may be caused by excessive catalyst, which reduces the selectivity of the product. However, since the hydrolysis of cellulose is generally more challenging than that of hemicellulose, the overall glucose yield was relatively lower. Therefore, considering all factors, a dosage of 0.04 g of the hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid sulfonated catalyst (Fe3O4@C-H) was deemed more effective for the hydrolysis experiments.
Suitable solvents and additives can improve the activity and selectivity of catalysts. In this study, water and gamma-valerolactone were used as solvents for the catalytic reaction. The effect of solvent ratio on the reaction outcome is illustrated in Figure 4b. A mixture of 0.04 g of the catalyst sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid and 0.04 g of rice straw was used after exploring the amount of catalyst. Then, these were combined with different gradients of GVL/H2O solvent systems. After reacting at 140 °C for 110 min, the yield of reducing sugars was compared across different solvent ratios. The results showed that the highest yield of reducing sugars from rice straw was observed with a GVL/H2O ratio of 2:8. The yields were higher than those obtained with pure water. GVL could reduce the conversion of xylose to furfural and condensation reaction of reducing sugars with intermediate molecules [49]. This indicated that by controlling the proportion of GVL in the solvent system, the yield of reducing sugars could be improved.
In addition, the effects of reaction temperature and time on the production of reducing sugar were also investigated. The conversion of cellulose and hemicellulose in straw can be increased by increasing the temperature and prolonging the reaction time. The results of reaction temperature and reaction time on the catalytic reaction are illustrated in Figure 5. Hydrolysis reactions were conducted using 0.04 g of the catalyst with rice straw as substrates at temperatures of 130 °C, 140 °C, and 150 °C. Reaction times ranged from 50 to 150 min. At the same temperature, the experimental groups were set every 20 min to correspond to different reaction times. The highest yield of reducing sugars was achieved at 110 min under all three temperatures. Comparing the three reaction temperatures, the experimental groups treated at 140 °C showed higher yields of glucose as well as significant yields of xylose and arabinose [50]. The peak yields of glucose and pentose were 22.23% and 76.67%, respectively, which were obtained under 140 °C for 110 min. This may be due to a too long reaction time or too high of temperature resulting in by-products or catalyst deactivation.
Due to the unique properties of magnetic carbon microspheres, the catalyst could be recovered after the reaction using a magnet. The recovered magnetic carbon microspheres were washed multiple times with water and alcohol to remove surface GVL until the solution reached a pH of approximately 7. The washed product was then dried overnight in an oven at 105 °C before being reused. The solid catalyst from the hydrolysis of rice straw at 140 °C for 110 min was recovered and reused under the same reaction conditions for multiple cycles [51,52]. As shown in Figure 6, the catalytic efficiency of the magnetic carbon microsphere catalyst slightly decreased after one reaction cycle. After four cycles, the yield of pentose sugars and glucose decreased by 5.71% and 1.51%, respectively. This phenomenon may be due to a decrease in the density of the acid sites in the catalyst or the inactivation of the structure. Some carbon deposits may have accumulated on the surface of the catalyst, causing the acid site to be covered and the acid site density to be reduced. Additionally, impurities or by-products in the reactants may interact with the acid site, rendering it inactive, reducing the catalytic efficiency. However, the specific catalyst deactivation factors still need to be further explored in the future, such as regeneration experiments. This is important for the lifetime and regeneration potential of the catalyst. This demonstrated that the magnetic carbon microsphere catalyst sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid has excellent stability and recyclability. However, further research on catalyst deactivation is still needed.
In summary, this study investigated the performance of two sulfonation catalysts for hydrolysis of rice straw to produce reducing sugars (glucose and pentose). The results show that the Fe3O4@C-H catalyst has similar catalytic performance to Fe3O4@C-S. Hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid has good biodegradability, which makes it not accumulate in the environment compared with traditional sulfonating agents, thus reducing the burden on the environment. Therefore, we further explored the optimum experimental conditions for the sulfonation catalyst. By comparing the amount of catalyst, ratio of reaction solvent, reaction time, and reaction temperature, the optimum conditions in the laboratory were obtained (0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, H2O/GVL ratio 8:2, 110 min at 140 °C). The pentose yield reached 76.67% and glucose yield reached 22.23%. In addition, the catalyst prepared in this study has magnetic properties that allow it to be easily separated by magnets after the reaction. The stability and catalytic performance of the catalyst remained high after four cycles of recycling.

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. Materials

FeCl3 (AR, 99%), Fe3O4, sodium polyacrylate, NaOH (95%), and citric acid trisodium salt (98%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). FeCl2·4H2O was purchased from Tianjin ZhiYuan Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China) Sulfuric acid (AR) was procured from Xihua, XiLONG SCIENTIFIC (Shantou, China). Hydroxyethanesulfonic acid (80%), ethanol (≥99.8%), and D-(+)-Xylose were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ultra-pure water was used throughout in this work.

3.2. The Preparation of the Catalyst

3.2.1. Preparation of Magnetic Nanoparticles Fe3O4

We dissolved FeCl3 and FeCl2·4H2O in distilled water under specific conditions, mixing thoroughly with a magnetic stirrer. We slowly added a 2 mol/L NaOH solution until the pH reached approximately 11, leading to the oxidation and hydrolysis of FeCl3 and FeCl2 and the formation of magnetic nanoparticles. We introduced a certain amount of trisodium citrate, then heated the solution to 80 °C and stirred continuously for 1 h. We separated the magnetic nanoparticles from the supernatant using a magnet and washed them repeatedly with ethanol and distilled water to remove impurity ions. We dried the precipitate in a vacuum drying oven at 60 °C, grinded it in a mortar after drying, and placed it into a centrifuge tube.

3.2.2. Preparation of Fe3O4@C Composite

We mixed 0.4 g of Fe3O4 and 4.0 g of xylose in 60 mL of H2O at a mass ratio of Fe3O4 to xylose of 1:10, then added 0.05 g of sodium polyacrylate. We stirred the mixture on a magnetic stirrer for 30 min to ensure complete dispersion, then transferred it to a reaction vessel and carbonized at 180 °C for 24 h. After the reaction, we performed magnetic separation, washed sequentially with water and ethanol, and vacuum dried at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain the Fe3O4@C composite.

3.2.3. Sulfonation of Fe3O4@C Composite

We combined 1.0 g of Fe3O4@C with 20 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid or 20 mL of hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid in a beaker, using concentrated sulfuric acid as a control. We stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 30 min to mix thoroughly, then transferred to a 100 mL polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-lined hydrothermal high-pressure reactor and heated in an oven at 180 °C for 4 h. We filtered the resulting product, washed with water and ethanol until the pH reached 7, dried in an oven, grinded after drying, and stored in a dry environment. The catalyst sulfonated by concentrated sulfuric acid was named Fe3O4@C-SO3-S(Fe3O4@C-S), and the catalyst sulfonated by hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid was named Fe3O4@C-SO3-H(Fe3O4@C-H) [53].

3.3. Characterization and Analysis of Catalysts

The hydrothermally synthesized carbon materials, as well as the carbon-based solid acid materials sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid and hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid, were characterized using various analytical techniques. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using a BRUCKER D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, Mannheim, Germany) with a copper target. The scanning angle range was 10–90°, and the scanning rate was 10°/min. The data analysis was performed using JADE 6.0 software. The morphological features of the three materials were examined using a ZEISS sigma 500 scanning electron microscope (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). The elemental distribution of the three materials was observed using the thermal field emission scanning electron microscope JSM-7800F. The infrared spectra were recorded using a Nicolet IS10 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The spectral range was 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution greater than 0.4 cm−1. Desorption measurements of the three materials were performed using the Nicolet 380 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 150 °C and 200 °C, collecting the infrared spectrum of adsorptive pyridine in the range of 650–4000 cm−1. The specific surface area and porosity of all materials were measured using a BSD-PS1 surface area analyzer (Beijing Beishide Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). N2 physical adsorption was employed, and the materials were degassed at 120 °C for 7 h. The pore size distribution and total pore volume were determined based on the BJH method applied to the adsorption isotherm data.

3.4. Test of Catalytic Performance of Catalyst for Production of Reducing Sugar

The composition of rice straw was determined using the two-step hydrolysis method developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in the USA [54]. The hydrolysate was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the concentrations of glucose, xylose, and arabinose. The cellulose and hemicellulose contents were calculated based on the measured sugar concentrations. The mass of ash and lignin was determined from the solid residue, and the ash content was further quantified by calcination, allowing the determination of lignin content. Rice straw is composed of 36% cellulose, 15.5% hemicellulose, 3.5% lignin, 9.8% ash, and 35.1% other components.
A mixture of 0.04 g of rice straw and a synthesized catalyst in a specific ratio of H2O/GVL was shaken well and placed in a 15 mL thick glass tube. Various sets of single-factor experiments were conducted by adjusting the reaction temperature, time, catalyst amount, and solvent ratio. The reaction mixture was filtered through a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane and analyzed by liquid chromatography. The remaining solid was dried in an oven at 60 °C, and a magnet was used to separate the catalyst from the reaction residue for catalyst reuse. The optimal reaction conditions were determined by selecting the appropriate catalyst and adjusting the catalyst amount, hydrolysis temperature, and reaction time based on the measured results.
The concentrations of glucose, xylose, and arabinose in the liquid samples were determined using an Agilent HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The conditions for the HPLC analysis were as follows: the mobile phase was a 5 mmol/L H2SO4 solution with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min, the column temperature was set at 35 °C, and a refractive index detector (RID) was used. The concentrations of the products were calculated based on the peak area and reference standards.
G l u c o s e   Y i e l d % = M a s s   o f   g l u c o s e M a s s   o f   c e l l u l o s e × 100 %
P e n t o s e   Y i e l d % = M a s s   o f   p e n t o s e M a s s   o f   h e m i c e l l u l o s e × 100 %

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully synthesized two carbon microsphere catalysts with magnetic recyclable properties by using two different sulfonating agents, concentrated sulfuric acid and hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid. The sulfonation catalyst using hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid (Fe3O4@C-H) showed obvious advantages over the sulfonation catalyst using concentrated sulfuric acid (Fe3O4@C-S) in the production of pentose from rice straw. Hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid was used as a green sulfonating agent, and its advantages compared with concentrated sulfuric acid were reflected in two aspects. 1. Hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid is mildly acidic and does not release volatile toxic gases during the catalytic process, reducing the production of harmful substances from the source. 2. Its unique water solubility and biodegradability mean the waste liquid after the reaction can be directly treated by simple dilution, avoiding the complicated waste liquid neutralization step in the traditional sulfuric acid process, and significantly reducing the risk of secondary pollution. Through optimization, we determined that under the best experimental conditions (0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g Fe3O4@C-H catalyst, H2O/GVL ratio 8:2, 110 min at 140 °C), the pentose yield reached 76.67% and the glucose yield was 22.23%.
Compared with other studies, the catalyst synthesized in this study combines the advantages of magnetic and sulfonation treatment and improves the recovery and catalytic performance of the catalyst. The reducing sugar yield we obtained under optimized conditions increased by 5–10% compared to previous studies [55]. In addition, the stability of the catalyst also showed obvious advantages. Compared with the activity decrease of 10–15% reported in the literature [29], the activity of the catalyst in this study only decreased by 5% after the fourth cycle. Nevertheless, there are still some unexplored aspects of this study. The prepared catalysts resulted in lower glucose yields, which limits their use as catalysts for glucose production. Although the two catalysts are similar in catalytic performance, performance differences may still lead to limited choice of catalysts in specific application scenarios. We look forward to further improving the synthesis method and structure of the catalyst in the future, which is expected to increase the output of glucose and pentose simultaneously. At the same time, the in-depth study of kinetics and reaction pathways is also very important, which is the key evidence for the comprehensive analysis of the transformation process of biomass and the design of catalysts. In addition to the rice straw used in this paper, other raw biomass materials as catalyst substrates were explored. We explored the industrial application of catalysts and provide effective strategies for the high-value utilization of bio mass.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30132675/s1, Figure S1: the magnetism of Fe3O4@C-H catalyst; Table S1: Textural properties of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H; Figure S2: Textural properties of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H; Figure S3: The EDX image of Fe3O4@C catalyst; Figure S4: The EDX image of Fe3O4@C-S catalyst; Figure S5: The EDX image of Fe3O4@C-H catalyst.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H.; Methodology, H.L.; Software, X.Z.; Validation, Y.Z.; Formal analysis, C.J.; Writing–original draft, M.X. and Y.D.; Writing–review & editing, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52206293 and 52466019) and Henan Institute of Sun Yat-sen University (No. N2021-002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mayer, A. Fossil fuel dependence and energy insecurity. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2022, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, K.; Shen, N.; Yang, M.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z.; He, A.; Xu, J.; et al. High-Efficiency Production of Biomass-Derived 5-Alkoxymethylfurfurals over a Lewis-Brønsted Bifunctional Carbonaceous Acid Catalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 16627–16640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, H.; Xin, G.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Si, C.; Chen, J.; Lu, L.; Peng, Y.; Li, X. Single-atoms Ru/NiFe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst: Efficient for oxidation of selective oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 339, 123157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Uzakov, G.; Beksultanova, A.; Aygumov, T.; Valeev, S.; Abdullozoda, R.; Bovtrikova, E.; Gibadullin, A.; Toshmamatov, B.; Morkovkin, D.; Sadullozoda, S. Achieving renewable energy goals through the utilization of renewable resources. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 411, 01008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.; Yang, J.; Xu, R.; Lu, L.; Kong, F.; Liang, M.; Jiang, L.; Nie, S.; Si, C. Kinetic study of furfural production from Eucalyptus sawdust using H-SAPO-34 as solid Brønsted acid and Lewis acid catalysts in biomass-derived solvents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 135, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, H.; Li, X.; Hu, W.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, L.; Si, C. Research Progress of Highly Efficient Noble Metal Catalysts for the Oxidation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202200352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kulikova, M.V.; Krylova, A.Y.; Zhagfarov, F.G.; Krysanova, K.O.; Lapidus, A.L. Plant Biomass as a Raw Material for Producing Basic Organic Sysnthesis Products. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils 2022, 58, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Terrer, R.P.P.C.; Hungate, B.A.; Rosende, J.; Pett-Ridge, J.; Craig, M.; van Groenigen, K.J.; Keenan, T.F.; Sulman, B.N.; Stocker, B.D.; Reich, P.B.; et al. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2. Nature 2021, 591, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alper, K.; Tekin, K.; Karagöz, S.; Ragauskas, A.J. Sustainable energy and fuels from biomass: A review focusing on hydrothermal biomass processing. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 4390–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, R.; Liu, K.; Du, H.; Liu, H.; Cao, X.; Zhao, X.; Qu, G.; Li, X.; Li, B.; Si, C. Falling Leaves Return to Their Roots: A Review on the Preparation of γ-Valerolactone from Lignocellulose and Its Application in the Conversion of Lignocellulose. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 6461–6476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, H.; Li, X.; Hu, W.; Lu, L.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, H.; Si, C. Recent advances on solid acid catalyic systems for production of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural from biomass derivatives. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 234, 107338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Izydorczyk, G.; Skrzypczak, D.; Mironiuk, M.; Mikula, K.; Samoraj, M.; Gil, F.; Taf, R.; Moustakas, K.; Chojnacka, K. Lignocellulosic biomass fertilizers: Production; characterization; agri-applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 923, 171343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mujtaba, M.; Fraceto, L.F.; Fazeli, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Savassa, S.M.; de Medeiros, G.A.; Pereira, A.D.E.S.; Mancini, S.D.; Lipponen, J.; Vilaplana, F. Lignocellulosic biomass from agricultural waste to the circular economy: A review with focus on biofuels, biocomposites and bioplastics. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 402, 136815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiu, B.; Shi, J.; Hu, W.; Gao, J.; Li, S.; Chu, H. Construction of hydrothermal liquefaction system for efficient production of biomass-derived furfural: Solvents, catalysts and mechanisms. Fuel 2023, 354, 129278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheenkachorn, K.; Mensah, R.Q.; Dharmalingam, B.; Gundupalli, M.P.; Rattanaporn, K.; Tantayotai, P.; Show, P.L.; Sriariyanun, M. The Versatility of Mixed Lignocellulose Feedstocks for Bioethanol Production: An Experimental Study and Empirical Prediction. Bioenerg. Res. 2023, 17, 1004–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Xu, R.; Liu, Q.; Liang, M.; Yang, J.; Lu, S.; Li, G.; Lu, L.; Si, C. Valorization of corn stover into furfural and levulinic acid over SAPO-18 zeolites: Effect of Brønsted to Lewis acid sites ratios. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Xu, R.; Yang, J.; Nie, S.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Si, C. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass and catalytic upgradation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yao, B.; Kang, Q.; Fu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ao, W.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Song, Y.; Deng, Z.; et al. Catalytic hydrolysis of corncob for production of furfural and cellulose-rich solids: Product characterization and analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2023, 168, 106658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, L.; Han, X.; Ma, Y.; Yang, X.; Lu, T. A mild oxidation strategy for oxidation-hydrolysis of cellulose without additional catalyst. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 14, 7725–7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ouyang, J.; He, W.-Q.; Li, Q.-M.; Chen, L.; Wu, X.-F.; Su, X.-J. Separation of Lignocellulose and Preparation of Xylose from Miscanthus lutarioriparius with a Formic Acid Method. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, J.Y.; Pan, X. Efficient sugar production from plant biomass: Current status, challenges, and future directions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 164, 112583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, W.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Duan, Y.; Lu, X.; Lu, L.; Si, C.; Peng, Y.; Li, X. Optimizing acidic site control for selective conversion of biomass-based sugar to furfural and levulinic acid through HSiW/MCM-41 catalyst. Biomass Bioenergy 2024, 186, 107275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.; Lu, X.; Nie, S.; Liang, M.; Yu, Z.; Duan, B.; Yang, J.; Xu, R.; Lu, L.; Si, C. Efficient catalytic production of biomass-derived levulinic acid over phosphotungstic acid in deep eutectic solvent. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, X.; Lu, X.; Liang, M.; Xu, R.; Yu, Z.; Duan, B.; Lu, L.; Si, C. Conversion of waste lignocellulose to furfural using sulfonated carbon microspheres as catalyst. Waste Manag. 2020, 108, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, K. Efficient conversion of biomass derivatives to furfural with a novel carbon-based solid acid catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2023, 175, 106608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, W.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Guan, S.; Chang, H.-M.; Jameel, H.; Ma, L. Enhanced furfural production from raw corn stover employing a novel heterogeneous acid catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Gu, J.; Shan, R.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y. Advances in thermochemical valorization of biomass towards carbon neutrality. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 212, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bai, Y.-Y.; Xiao, L.-P.; Sun, R.-C. Efficient hydrolyzation of cellulose in ionic liquid by novel sulfonated biomass-based catalysts. Cellulose 2014, 21, 2327–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weerasai, K.; Champreda, V.; Sakdaronnarong, C.; Shotipruk, A.; Laosiripojana, N. Hydrolysis of eucalyptus wood chips under hot compressed water in the presence of sulfonated carbon-based catalysts. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 110, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, W.; He, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S.; Yu, Q.; Wang, W.; Leksawasdi, N.; Wang, C.; Yuan, Z. Carbon-Based Solid Acid Pretreatment in Corncob Saccharification: Specific Xylose Production and Efficient Enzymatic Hydrolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3640–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, X.L.Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Wei, Q.; Zhuang, X.; Luo, Y.; Yuan, Z. Hydrolysis of Corncob Using a Modified Carbon-based Solid Acid Catalyst. BioResources 2016, 11, 10469–10482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Lu, X.; Hu, W.; Xu, H.; Chen, J.; Xiong, J.; Lu, L.; Yu, Z.; Si, C. Phosphotungstic acid functionalized biochar for furfural production from corncob. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 229, 107178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, X.; Xu, H.; Hu, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, L.; Si, C. One step synthesis of Mo-doped carbon microspheres for valorization corncob to levulinic acid. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 184, 115019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peymanfar, R.; Fazlalizadeh, F. Fabrication of expanded carbon microspheres/ZnAl2O4 nanocomposite and investigation of its microwave, magnetic, and optical performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 854, 157273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khatun, R.; Mamun, M.S.A.; Islam, S.; Khatun, N.; Hakim, M.; Hossain, M.S.; Dhar, P.K.; Barai, H.R. Phytochemical-Assisted Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Their Catalytic Activity. Micromachines 2022, 13, 2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mahajan, V.P.; Kolekar, Y.A.; Bhanage, B.M. Magnetically separable Ni/Fe3O4: An efficient catalyst for phenoxy carbonylation of aryl iodides using bifunctional o-chlorophenyl formate as a CO source. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2023, 37, e7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Q.; Deng, W.; Rao, S.; Wu, X.; Ye, Q. Conversion of wet microalgae to biodiesel with microalgae carbon based magnetic solid acid catalyst. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 286, 117022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, C.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Y.; Wu, S. Esterification of levulinic acid into ethyl levulinate catalyzed by sulfonated bagasse-carbonized solid acid. BioResources 2019, 14, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Flores, K.P.; Omega, J.L.O.; Cabatingan, L.K.; Go, A.W.; Agapay, R.C.; Ju, Y.-H. Simultaneously carbonized and sulfonated sugarcane bagasse as solid acid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ribeiro, F.C.P.; Santos, J.L.; Araujo, R.O.; Santos, V.O.; Chaar, J.S.; Tenório, J.A.S.; de Souza, L.K.C. Sustainable catalysts for esterification: Sulfonated carbon spheres from biomass waste using hydrothermal carbonization. Renew. Energy 2024, 220, 119653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, H.; Xiong, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, S. Conversion of Xylose to Furfural Catalyzed by Carbon-Based Solid Acid Prepared from Pectin. Energ. Fuel 2021, 35, 9961–9969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, Q.; Lu, Y.; Peng, Q.; Chen, W.; Fan, G.; Chai, B.; Song, G. Synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose catalyzed by sulfonated carbon-based solid acid. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 13, 9195–9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mohan, V.B.; Jayaraman, K.; Bhattacharyya, D. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area analysis of different graphene materials: A comparison to their structural regularity and electrical properties. Solid State Commun. 2020, 320, 114004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, X.; Jia, L.; Cheng, J.; Sun, Z. Magnetic ordered mesoporous carbon materials for adsorption of minocycline from aqueous solution: Preparation, characterization and adsorption mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kevin, M.W.; Liang, X. Synthesis of a Novel Porous Carbon Based Solid Acid and Its Catalytic Activities for Biodiesel Synthesis from Waste Oils. Kinet. Catal. 2020, 61, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, M.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Liang, D.; Zhou, Z.; Xin, H.; Li, C.; Yuan, G.; Wang, J. Sulfonated P-W modified nitrogen-containing carbon-based solid acid catalysts for one-pot conversion of cellulose to ethyl levulinate under water-ethanol medium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260 Pt 1, 129472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bullo, T.A.; Bayisa, Y.M.; Bultum, M.S. Biosynthesis of sulfonated carbon catalyst from carbohydrate polymer derivatives for epoxidation of Croton macrostachyus seed oil. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 3, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Su, T.; Zeng, J.; Gao, H.; Jiang, L.; Bai, X.; Zhou, H.; Xu, F. One-pot synthesis of a chemically functional magnetic carbonaceous acid catalyst for fermentable sugars production from sugarcane bagasse. Fuel 2020, 262, 116512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, C.Y.; Cai, B.; Zhang, L.; Feng, J.F.; Pan, H. Acid-Catalyzed Conversion of Cellulose Into Levulinic Acid with Biphasic Solvent System. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 630807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sabry, T.M.; El-Korashy, S.A.E.-H.; Jahin, H.E.S.; Khairy, G.M.; Aal, N.F.A. Hydrothermal carbonization of Calotropis procera leaves as a biomass: Preparation and characterization. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1302, 137397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, X.; Lu, H.; Wu, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, B. Hierarchical porous carbon-based solid acid as a high-performance catalyst for conversion of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Fuel 2024, 363, 130835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Panchal, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, J.; Bian, K.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, B. Waste to value addition: Utilization of waste corn cob from corn plant derived novel green acidic catalyst for effective synthesis of esters. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 4277–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, H.; Dong, X.; Shou, J. Synthesis of Novel Magnetic Carbon Microtube-Based Solid Acid and Its Catalytic Activities for Biodiesel Synthesis. Catalysts 2022, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deshavath, N.N.; Goud, V.V.; Veeranki, V.D. Commercialization of 2G bioethanol as a transportation fuel for the sustainable energy, environment, and economic growth of India: Theoretical and empirical assessment of bioethanol potential from agriculture crop residues. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 14, 3551–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, Q.-X.; Zhang, C.-H.; Wang, X.-H.; Cheng, B.-G.; Mai, N.; Ren, J.-L. Impact of activation on properties of carbon-based solid acid catalysts for the hydrothermal conversion of xylose and hemicelluloses. Catal. Today 2019, 319, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The SEM image of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation: (a,b) before sulfonation, (c,d) sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid, (e,f) sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid. The EDX image of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation: (g,h) before sulfonation, (ik) sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid, (ln) sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid.
Figure 1. The SEM image of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation: (a,b) before sulfonation, (c,d) sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid, (e,f) sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid. The EDX image of the magnetic carbon materials before and after sulfonation: (g,h) before sulfonation, (ik) sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid, (ln) sulfonated with hydroxyethyl sulfonic acid.
Molecules 30 02675 g001
Figure 2. XRD (a), infrared spectra (b), nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (c), and pore diameter distribution (d) of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H.
Figure 2. XRD (a), infrared spectra (b), nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (c), and pore diameter distribution (d) of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H.
Molecules 30 02675 g002
Figure 3. The pyridine infrared spectra of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H at different temperatures: (a) 150 °C and (b) 200 °C.
Figure 3. The pyridine infrared spectra of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H at different temperatures: (a) 150 °C and (b) 200 °C.
Molecules 30 02675 g003
Figure 4. Effect of catalyst amount (a) and solvent ratio (b) on conversion of rice straw to glucose and pentose catalyzed by Fe3O4@C-H (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 140 °C, 110 min).
Figure 4. Effect of catalyst amount (a) and solvent ratio (b) on conversion of rice straw to glucose and pentose catalyzed by Fe3O4@C-H (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 140 °C, 110 min).
Molecules 30 02675 g004
Figure 5. Effect of temperature and time on conversion of rice straw to glucose (a) and pentose (b) (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, 0.8 mL GVL, 3.2 mL distilled water).
Figure 5. Effect of temperature and time on conversion of rice straw to glucose (a) and pentose (b) (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, 0.8 mL GVL, 3.2 mL distilled water).
Molecules 30 02675 g005
Figure 6. Recycling of Fe3O4@C-H for converting rice straw to glucose and pentose (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, 140 °C, 110 min, 0.8 mL GVL, 3.2 mL distilled water).
Figure 6. Recycling of Fe3O4@C-H for converting rice straw to glucose and pentose (reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, 140 °C, 110 min, 0.8 mL GVL, 3.2 mL distilled water).
Molecules 30 02675 g006
Table 1. The acid sites’ density of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H.
Table 1. The acid sites’ density of Fe3O4@C, Fe3O4@C-S, and Fe3O4@C-H.
SampleTemperature (°C)Number of Acid Sites (μmol/g)B/L
B AcidL AcidTotal Acid
Fe3O4@C1502.374113.175115.5500.021
2001.77029.11730.8870.061
Fe3O4@C-S15015.164122.268137.4320.124
20013.21048.15661.3660.274
Fe3O4@C-H15010.906188.157199.0630.058
2006.39793.819100.2170.068
Table 2. The yield of glucose and pentose catalyzed by Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H.
Table 2. The yield of glucose and pentose catalyzed by Fe3O4@C-S and Fe3O4@C-H.
Time (min)Glucose Yield (%)Pentose Yield (%)
Fe3O4@C-SFe3O4@C-HFe3O4@C-SFe3O4@C-H
5029.35 21.76 73.15 69.49
7028.58 22.12 74.56 73.55
9028.91 22.11 76.51 73.25
11028.36 22.2374.25 76.67
13026.61 21.91 71.79 74.54
15026.26 21.27 68.24 71.39
Reaction condition: 0.04 g rice straw, 0.04 g catalyst, 140 °C.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, M.; Duan, Y.; Li, H.; He, S.; Zi, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiao, C.; Li, X. A Pathway for Sugar Production from Agricultural Waste Catalyzed by Sulfonated Magnetic Carbon Microspheres. Molecules 2025, 30, 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132675

AMA Style

Xu M, Duan Y, Li H, He S, Zi X, Zhao Y, Jiao C, Li X. A Pathway for Sugar Production from Agricultural Waste Catalyzed by Sulfonated Magnetic Carbon Microspheres. Molecules. 2025; 30(13):2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Maoru, Yanfeng Duan, Hongfu Li, Shoulin He, Xingyu Zi, Yanting Zhao, Cheng Jiao, and Xiaoyun Li. 2025. "A Pathway for Sugar Production from Agricultural Waste Catalyzed by Sulfonated Magnetic Carbon Microspheres" Molecules 30, no. 13: 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132675

APA Style

Xu, M., Duan, Y., Li, H., He, S., Zi, X., Zhao, Y., Jiao, C., & Li, X. (2025). A Pathway for Sugar Production from Agricultural Waste Catalyzed by Sulfonated Magnetic Carbon Microspheres. Molecules, 30(13), 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132675

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop