Next Article in Journal
Identification and Adulteration Evaluation of Rubiae Radix Et Rhizoma and Its Common Adulterants Based on LC-MS and Chemometrics
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Diazinon Exposure: A GC-MS/MS Validation Study of BChE Measurement by Point-of-Care Testing and Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Use of Naringinase to Modify the Sensory Quality of Foods and Increase the Bioavailability of Flavonoids: A Systematic Review

by
Joanna Bodakowska-Boczniewicz
and
Zbigniew Garncarek
*
Department of Biotechnology and Food Analysis, Faculty of Production Engineering, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(11), 2376; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112376
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 24 May 2025 / Accepted: 27 May 2025 / Published: 29 May 2025

Abstract

:
As a complex of enzymes α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase, naringinase catalyzes the deglycosylation of flavonoids. According to the PRISMA method, a systematic literature review was conducted analyzing peer-reviewed scientific articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Recent reviews on naringinase have focused on its sources, production, and general applications, whereas the present study highlights its specific applications, its role in the deglycosylation of flavonoids, and the resulting improvement in their bioavailability. This review focuses on advances in modifying the glycosidic parts of various flavonoids using naringinase by selectively disconnecting the rhamnose or glucose moiety. Removing rhamnose from the flavonoid molecule but leaving the glucose allows more water-soluble compounds to be present and increases bioavailability. A necessary condition for such selective deglycosylation is removing or inhibiting beta-glucosidase, the second enzyme in the native naringinase molecule. The use of naringinase for preparing functional beverages with increased antioxidant activity and for preparing steviol sweeteners is also presented. Naringinase enables the desired sensory properties to be obtained, primarily the taste and aroma of food products, and can be used in combination with other enzymes, e.g., pectinase and tannase.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Naringinase is an enzyme with dual activity: α-l-rhamnosidase (EC 3.2.1.40) and β-d-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21). Naringinase and α-rhamnosidase are often used as synonyms in the literature. Naringinase, hesperidinase, and rhamnosidase have the same EC number (EC 3.2.1.40). Naringinase and hesperidinase are commercial enzymes containing α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase activity [1]. Some authors define naringinase as an enzymatic complex with α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase activity [2]. Still, others claim that naringinase is a mixture of two separate enzymes, α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase [3].
The catalytic mechanism of naringinase is attributable to its membership in the glycoside hydrolase family [3]. The protein structure of α-l-rhamnosidase reveals that the enzyme has a significant role in naringinase functionality and activity and that numerous negatively charged residues, including Asp568, Glu572, Asp579, and Glu841, potentially play a key role in enzymatic catalysis and substrate binding [4].
Naringinase has been reported in the literature since 1938. It was initially isolated from celery seeds and later from grapefruit leaves [3]; most notably, it has been found in the molds of the Aspergillus genus [5], Penicilium [6], as well as bacteria [7,8,9,10] and yeast [11]. However, it should be emphasized that, due to the use of naringinase, the enzyme should come from microorganisms included in the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) group.
Several review articles on naringinase have been published in the past ten years. These studies primarily focus on the microbiological sources of the enzyme and generally discuss its applications—mainly the removal of bitterness, but also highlighting its potential medical uses [12,13,14,15]. The data presented in this article provide a more detailed account of the application of naringinase in the juice industry and, more importantly, of its role in the deglycosylation of flavonoids and the resulting enhancement of their bioavailability.
The present study aims to demonstrate the potential of naringinase in the selective deglycosylation of flavonoids by targeting rhamnose or glucose moieties, with a focus on enhancing the bioavailability of the resulting aglycones and glucoside derivatives and exploring its applications in the development of functional beverages and steviol sweeteners, and in improving the sensory properties of food products.
There are only a few commercial manufacturers of naringinase, mainly from China. Although many microorganisms can synthesize naringinase, most commercially available products are of fungal origin. An obstacle to obtaining fungal naringinase is the slow growth rate of naringinase-producing fungi. UV-ARTP combinatorial mutagenesis was recently used to obtain an A. tubingensis strain with higher productivity and naringinase activity [16]. The highest naringinase activity of 2475 ± 16 U mg−1 was obtained after only 96 h of culture. These results show that naringinase production can significantly increase using combined ARTP (Atmospheric- and Room-Temperature Plasma) and UV mutagenesis. In addition, a new and simple screening method for naringinase-producing microorganisms was developed based on their growth in the presence of naringin as the sole carbon source, followed by plate exposure to iodine vapor [17]. This method can potentially fill the gap left by the unavailability of an effective screening methodology for industrially important naringinase-synthesizing microorganisms.
Many natural glycosides containing an α-rhamnose or β-glucose residue can be substrates for naringinase. These include naringin, rutin, quercetin, hesperidin, neohesperidin, diosmin, myricitrin, monoterpenes, and some saponins, including ginsenosides [1,6,18].

2. Methodology

This study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to conduct the systematic review study [19]. This study employed two electronic databases (Scopus and Web of Science) and used the keyword “naringinase”. Boolean operators were not used. The search and selection process was performed by two reviewers working independently and in parallel.
The study for this systematic review was restricted to articles published between 2005 and 2025. For databases, four primally exclusion steps were determined: (1) keyword (“naringinase”); (2) year; (3) language (English); (4) publication type (article). Screening was performed in the following areas: Title, Abstract, Keywords. The last search was carried out on 27 February 2025.
Among the initial 578 reports collected through the search, 201 were omitted due to duplicate results, from which 131 were removed because of the year and 39 were removed because of the study type. Also, 27 were excluded because they were not in English language. Of 180 retrieved reports, 115 articles were deemed irrelevant based on abstract and/or title information.
Before conducting the systematic literature search following the PRISMA methodology, the authors had previously identified 15 articles based on prior research, expert recommendations, and manual screening of the literature. The review included these articles as additional sources (“Identification of studies from other sources”). They were subjected to the selection process according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 80 articles were included in this study, as demonstrated in a flowchart of the literature search and selection process (Figure 1). The Prisma checklist was added as Supplementary Material.

3. Use of Naringinase

Naringinase is an enzyme complex used in the deglycosylation of compounds with high application potential in the food industry. Naringinase is used in the alcoholic beverage industry (wine and beer) and the soft drink industry (teas and juices). The beverage industry is constantly looking for innovations that improve fruit and floral flavors to increase the diversity of existing flavor profiles [20].
This enzyme is critical in citrus processing, where hydrolyzing naringin can remove bitterness. It is also used to improve the flavor of wines, juices, and other beverages [5,21]; it can increase the bioavailability of flavonoids and antioxidant potential, can be used to produce sweeteners, and can improve the quality of soy products.

3.1. Removing the Bitter Taste of Citrus Juice

The bitter taste of some citrus species, especially grapefruit, is considered a desirable quality trait [22], but only if it is not in excess. Naringin, a flavonoid glycoside, and the limonoids limonin and nomilin are primarily responsible for the bitter taste of citrus fruits [6].
Adsorption techniques [23] or enzymatic hydrolysis [4,10] are used to remove the bitter components of citrus juices. Today, consumers expect maximum preservation of fruit products’ endogenous sensory, nutritional, and health properties. The use of new enzyme technologies, which have little effect on altering the organoleptic and health characteristics of citrus fruits, can be considered as an alternative to the conventional bitter taste removal process, physical adsorption [24]. Fresh grapefruit juice is the richest source of naringin. The content of naringin in grapefruit juice is about 230–840 µg cm−3 [7,24]. High concentrations of naringin are also found in the juice of pomelo, bitter orange, or kinnow mandarins.
The specific reaction of naringinase is the hydrolysis of naringin. The naringin molecule contains the aglycone naringenin and two sugar moieties, a rhamnosidic and a glucosidic residue, which are linked by an α-1,2 glycosidic bond [3]. Two enzymes, α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase, are required for the complete deglycosylation of naringin. The first of these, α-l-rhamnosidase, hydrolyzes naringin to rhamnose and prunin. Next, β-d-glucosidase hydrolyzes prunin to glucose and naringenin (Figure 2).
The reduction in bitter taste is directly related to the reduction in naringin. It is reported that the bitterness of prunin is already almost 70% less than that of naringin. Further hydrolysis of prunin by β-d-glucosidase leads to tasteless naringenin [22]. Many publications have been devoted to the enzymatic removal of the bitter taste from citrus juices through a naringinase preparation. Table 1 summarizes studies on this topic.
Various forms of naringinase have been used to remove bitterness enzymatically. The results of ongoing studies indicate the potential for enzymatic removal of bitterness from citrus juice and the possibility of mutagenesis or overexpression of genes to increase naringinase activity.
In research on bitter taste removal, attention should be paid to temperature in the processing. Temperature is important in preserving fruit products’ endogenous sensory, nutritional, and health properties. A low temperature in the technological process preserves the sensory properties of the juice. At such temperatures, with short exposure times, the shelf life of thermolabile components of citrus juices is more significant, which does not cause tangible changes in the sensory qualities of products. Most authors have used elevated temperatures around 50° C for the hydrolysis of naringin in citrus juices, which did not leave the sensory qualities of the juices unaffected. Nevertheless, further research on optimizing and scaling up the process is needed before full commercialization.
Other potential applications of the enzyme are being explored, such as using naringinase to remove bitter taste. Del Nobile et al. [40] obtained an active food film capable of hydrolyzing naringin contained in grapefruit juice during storage. The active film consists of a glutaraldehyde-crosslinked matrix on which naringinase from P. decumbens was immobilized.
Naringinase and enzymes that degrade hemicellulose and cellulose were used to improve yuzu powder’s functional and organoleptic properties. Applying such an enzyme system reduced the bitterness of yuzu powder by 50% compared to the control sample. The treatment of yuzu powder with the enzyme combination improves its physicochemical properties and biological activity. It reduces its bitterness, thus expanding its application in the food, nutraceutical, and cosmetic industries [41]. Also, naringinase from A. oryzae NYO-2 reduced the content of naringin and neohesperidin in yuzu fruit powder by 87.8% and 89.4% [42].
Using naringinase from Thermomicrobia sp. reduced the bitterness of kinnow fruit pomace, which was then used to produce nutrient-rich pasta. Under optimized conditions in the fruit pomace, the naringin content was reduced by 65.95%, combined with an increase in the concentration of naringenin (60.13%). Kinnow pomace is rich in fiber, phytochemicals, and antioxidants. Adding to semolina, pomace, after enzymatic treatment, resulted in pasta rich in nutrients and antioxidants. The resulting pasta had an original flavor and an attractive orange color and had the right consistency. Studies have shown that enzymatically processed kinnow pomace can successfully prepare nutrient-rich pasta and other extruded food products [32].

3.2. Flavor Enhancement of Fruit Juices and Wines

Compounds that play an important role in shaping the aroma of wine and juices can exist in free form or as non-volatile, odorless glycosides, so-called aroma precursors. Volatile aglycones are released from the glycosidic forms during production or storage.
Aroma precursors are built from an aglycone and a sugar residue, linked by a β-d-glycosidic bond. Aglycones are directly linked to β-d-glucopyranose, which can also be substituted with a second sugar unit with α-l-arabinofuranose, β-d-apiophuranose, and α-l-ramnopyranose, among others [43]. Flavor compounds can be removed from their glycosidic forms naturally during fruit ripening or by hydrolysis by exogenous enzymes.
Improvements in flavor and aroma often result from the activity of glycolytic enzymes already in the plant, present at fermentation sites, or added during winemaking [44]. For naringinase to work effectively under typical winemaking conditions, it should have a tolerance to low pH (3.2–4.0), activity in high sugar concentrations (up to 20% w/v), and high ethanol concentrations (10–15% v/v in wine), as well as activity in the presence of sulfites and other compounds [44]. In order to improve the aroma of juices and wine, many authors have investigated the possibility of enzymatic hydrolysis of aroma precursors by using enzymes such as β-d-glucosidase, α-l-rhamnosidase, β-apiofuranosidase, and α-l-arabinosidase [43].
Some authors have tested the usefulness of naringinase in enhancing the aroma intensity of juices and wines [21,45]. It has been shown that using free naringinase from P. decumbens resulted in a 1.5-fold increase in the impression of aroma intensity of freshly squeezed grapefruit juice and Pinot noir wine [21].
Ni et al. [46], based on a study combining gas chromatography, mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and sensory evaluation, found that, after adding naringinase from A. niger to pomelo juice, aroma sensations more than doubled. In addition, it was described that using naringinase and a pectinolytic enzyme preparation in citrus juice production also improves the yield of the juice process [45].
An α-rhamnosidase from Pediococcus acidilactici combined with a bacterial β-glucosidase was used to release grape-derived terpenes in Muscat wine. Under optimal conditions, the enzymes released linalool and cis-linalool oxide from Muscat wine extract. In addition, α-rhamnosidase can release significant amounts of geraniol and citronellol/nerol. However, due to the substantial adverse effects of acidity and ethanol on the activity of these enzymes, their use is limited [47].
In a study by Gao et al. [48], ougan juice was treated with α-l-rhamnosidases, β-glucosidases, and limoninases from A. niger. The mixture was subjected to ultrasound treatment at 20, 28, 40, and 68 kHz frequencies for 10 to 120 min at temperatures between 20 °C and 70 °C. This enzymatic and ultrasonic treatment effectively reduced the juice’s green, citrus-like, floral, and woody notes while enhancing fruity and sweet notes by 18% and 15%, respectively. As a result, the overall taste and aroma scores increased by 38% and 33%.
Glycosides bound to volatile molecules are also generally considered precursors of tea aroma. Ni et al. [49] improved the aroma of white tea using β-glucosidase. The use of β-glucosidase and α-rhamnosidase led to an increased ability to release aromatic tea components from Ginkgo biloba leaves [50]. Like wine production, exogenous β-glucosidases can be added to the beer production process to optimize the release of glycoside-linked aromatic molecules, thereby improving beer quality [44].
However, their application is limited due to the substantial adverse effects of acidity and ethanol on enzyme activity. Further research is needed on enhancing enzyme stability and activity at low pH and elevated alcohol content.

3.3. One-Time Clarification and Removal of the Bitter Taste of Beverages

Choosing a good clarification method is essential to preserve fruit juices’ natural essence, color, rheological properties, and texture. Fresh fruit juices are viscous and cloudy due to the presence of various polysaccharides such as pectin, cellulose, and starch. These polysaccharides lead to the formation of a colloidal stable suspension of insoluble particles, which hinders the clarification process and thus reduces the quality of fruit juice [51]. Therefore, it is essential to decompose these polysaccharides, after which the filtered juice can be stored for further use. Using enzyme blends such as pectinase, tannase, carbohydrase, naringinase, and lipase/esterase can provide better juice yield and help maintain better nutritional values.
In a study by Ladole et al. [51], pectinase and naringinase were immobilized on chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (chitosanMNP). The co-immobilized biocatalysts were evaluated for clarification and bitterness removal from grapefruit juice, and a 52% reduction in turbidity and an 85% reduction in naringin content were found. Naringin hydrolysis is facilitated by reducing juice turbidity due to simultaneous pectinase treatment. By reducing the viscosity of the juice, naringinase can act more effectively.
Kumar et al. [52] successfully removed bitterness and clarified pomelo juice using immobilized enzymes naringinase and tannase. Ni et al. [46] found that combining pectinase increased juice yield and bitterness removal. There was an increase in soluble pectin content, total soluble solids (TSS), and juice clarity, while the bitterness of naringin, limonin, and nomilin decreased.
Other researchers added 4% pectinase enzyme to grapefruit juice and performed a clarification reaction for 90 min at 45 °C. After centrifugation, a clear juice was obtained, which was then treated with a naringinase derived from Serratia marcescens to remove naringin. Under optimal conditions, the enzyme hydrolyzed 88.85% of the naringin contained in the clear grapefruit juice [36].
In addition, it has been shown that β-glucosidase can reduce wine coloration. β-glucosidase hydrolyzes the anthocyanins responsible for wine color. The breakdown of anthocyanins produces anthocyanidins, which naturally decompose into colorless compounds [44].
One of the main challenges in using different enzymes is the need to select optimal pH and temperature values common to the activity of all enzymes. Additionally, free naringinase poses several practical limitations, such as the inability to reuse the enzyme, its sensitivity to environmental changes, and difficulties separating the enzyme from reaction mixtures. These issues can be effectively addressed through various enzyme immobilization techniques.

3.4. Increasing the Bioavailability of Flavonoids

Flavonoids are usually found in plants as aglycones bound to sugar residues and, in this form, they are supplied to the human body with food [53]. Despite the broad spectrum of therapeutic activities of flavonoids, their use is limited by poor absorption due to their low solubility in water. Poor solubility of flavonoids results in low bioavailability and high variability in their absorption, which limits their use as food additives or dietary supplements [18]. Glycosylation naturally affects flavonoids’ biophysical and biochemical properties and their biological activity [54]. However, the effect is dependent on the respective sugar groupings. While glucosylation or galactosylation usually increase the solubility of flavonoids in water, the presence of rhamnosyl residues slightly reduces it. For example, the 7-O-glucoside of hesperetin is about 50 times more soluble in water [55] and 55 times more soluble in 10% ethanol than hesperidin [56]. The presence of sugar groupings can lead to a change in the bioavailability of the corresponding flavonoid aglycone depending on the nature of the sugar, as, for example, glucosides are absorbed faster than other types of glycosides, such as rhamnosides and rhamnoglucosides. Due to the hindered absorption of flavonoids, solutions seek to increase their bioavailability, such as by deglycosylation [54].
The lower bioavailability of some flavonoids is mainly due to the lack of suitable hydrolyzing enzymes in the human gastrointestinal tract. While glucosides can be cleaved by intestinal lactose-floroside hydrolase or β-glucosidase of small intestinal epithelial cells, there is no human α-l-rhamnosidase or rutinosidase, and the bioavailability of rhamnose-containing flavonoids is entirely dependent on their cleavage by the intestinal microbiota [54,57]. Therefore, compared to other flavonoid diglycosides, flavonoid mono glucosides have higher bioavailability and are easier to absorb and metabolize in the human digestive tract [57].
Unlike glucosides, which glucosidases can break down throughout the gastrointestinal tract, rutinosides, including disomine, can only be digested in parts of the gastrointestinal tract where there are enterobacteria capable of producing enzymes with rhamnosidase activity that cleave off rhamnose molecules in the terminal position. Diosmin is converted by gastrointestinal bacteria into aglycone diosmetin during digestion and is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract in this form. The degree of deglycosylation of flavonoids can be increased by supplying these compounds to the food along with appropriate enzymes. Naringinase can be microencapsulated with rhamnose-containing flavonoids such as diosmin or hesperidin. Microencapsulated naringinase increases the absorption of flavonoids from the gastrointestinal tract by enzymatic breakdown of the flavonoid molecule containing rhamnose to its aglycone. Diosmin is hydrolyzed to diosmethine in the gastrointestinal tract, and hesperidin is hydrolyzed to hesperetin [18].
Several attempts have been made to increase the bioavailability of flavonoids. A patented method for complexing the flavonoids contained in ginkgo biloba extract involved treatment with naringinase in the presence of γ-cyclodextrin. Incorporating of ginkgo biloba extract into γ-cyclodextrin in the presence of naringinase improves the bioavailability of flavonoids, primarily quercetin, kemferol, and isoramnetin [58]. In addition, inclusion complexes of isoquercitrin in cyclodextrin and hesperetin 7-O-glucoside (Hes-7-G) in β-cyclodextrin showed about 10- and 100-fold higher bioavailability in humans than their rutinoside forms, respectively. An inclusion complex of diosmethin glucoside in γ-cyclodextrin was prepared by reacting diosmethin and naringinase with γ-cyclodextrin. The bioavailability of diosmetin glucoside was about 800 times higher than that of biosmetin after its administration in rats [59].
Enzymatic hydrolysis via naringinase may be a promising method for increasing the bioavailability of ginsenosides [60]. Ginsenosides are the main active component of ginseng. A practical method has been developed to convert ginsenosides into a highly bioactive compound K, i.e., 20-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-20 (S)-protopanaxadiol. Due to the removal of glycosyls, this compound shows high bioactivity and bioavailability after the oral administration of ginseng. Ginsenosides can be efficiently converted to compound K by naringinase. The optimal conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis were a pH of 4.1, a temperature of 50 °C, and a time of 71 h; the reaction yield was 65.44 ± 4.52% [61].
The enhanced bioavailability of flavonoids was also achieved through their esterification. A. oryzae cells cultured in the presence of a naringin-containing inducer exhibited both lipase and naringinase activity, enabling two processes to be carried out simultaneously—the hydrolysis of naringin to naringenin and the acylation of naringin to its esters. The hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase yielded naringenin, which improves sensory quality by reducing the bitter taste. At the same time, acylation catalyzed by lipase yielded naringin esters with different fatty acid chain lengths. The obtained esters showed significantly better antioxidant activity and increased bioavailability than naringin alone. Whole cells of A. oryzae can effectively produce lipophilic derivatives of naringin in citrus extracts. These derivatives may find wider applications than naringin in the food and pharmaceutical industries, opening up new prospects for developing the citrus processing industry [62].

3.4.1. Hydrolysis of Naringin

Naringin and its hydrolysis products, rhamnose, prunin, and naringenin, are the starting materials for synthesizing substances used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries. The results of many studies confirm that naringin and its hydrolysis products have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcer, and anti-cancer properties [37,63,64]. Naringin, prunin, and naringenin have similar uses, so it can be inferred that the biological activity of these flavonoids is related to the aglycone grouping rather than the presence of sugar residues.
Naringinase may effectively increase the potential bioavailability of naringin by converting it into another component, prunin [65]. The solubility of prunin is 5.81 ± 0.12 mM and is 7.6 times higher than that of naringin, suggesting that prunin may be a more bioavailable food compound [64]. The solubility of naringenin is 0.068 ± 0.01 mM, which is ~1/10 that of naringin.
Efficient methods have been developed to produce rhamnose and prunin by inactivating β-d-glucosidase from naringinase. Naringinase in an alkaline environment loses β-d-glucosidase activity and thus can produce only intermediates [66]. Selective inactivation of β-d-glucosidase from naringinase was also achieved at acidic pH, maintaining very high α-l-rhamnosidase activity (78%). It was a key development toward an easy and inexpensive method of producing expensive flavonoids such as prunin [2]. Chang et al. [65] obtained a purified preparation of naringinase from A. sojae with high α-l-rhamnosidase activity and low β-d-glucosidase activity. Enzymatic bioconversion of naringin to prunin by naringinase proceeded with 91% efficiency. Kaur et al. [67] hydrolyzing naringin extracted from citrus peel indicated that recombinant α-l-rhamnosidase has industrial applications for producing rhamnose and prunin.
Carceller et al. [63] showed that naringinase covalently immobilized on graphene oxide has a high potential to produce prunin and naringenin. Naringinase from P. decumbens was purified, to produce prunin resulting in an enzyme with high α-rhamnosidase activity. Naringinase from P decumbens, characterized by high α-l-rhamnosidase activity, was covalently immobilized on silica zeolite carrier ITQ-2 and used to hydrolyze naringenin. This process yielded prunin and naringenin with a conversion rate exceeding 90% and excellent selectivity [68].
Recently, naringenin was obtained through the hydrolysis of naringin by naringinase from A. oryzae, which was then combined with nanosilver. The resulting preparation exhibited enhanced antimicrobial potential against protozoa, bacteria, and fungi [69]. Wang et al. [70] developed an artificial naringinase system by jointly immobilizing α-l-rhamnosidase from A. oryzae FJ0123 and β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima MSB8 on magnetic-silica-based chitosan microspheres. The molar ratio of α-l-rhamnosidase and β-glucosidase in the optimal system was 3:1. Using such an enzyme system, a yield of 96% naringenin was obtained within 2 h without prunin accumulation. Artificial fusion naringinases were developed to compensate for natural enzyme defects and improve naringenin production efficiency. Models of three fusion naringinases were developed by direct fusion or peptide linkers and expressed in E. coli BL21. It facilitated the efficient hydrolysis of naringin to naringenin, with a final yield of 13.5 mg·cm−3 at a time/space efficiency of 2.25 mg·cm−3·h−1. These results demonstrate the potential of artificial fusion naringinases for efficient bioconversion of naringin to naringenin [71].
The efficiency of naringin hydrolysis to prunin depends on the inactivation of β-d-glucosidase. Deglycosylation of flavonoids solely by α-l-rhamnosidase, a component of naringinase, results in glucoside-containing compounds with potentially higher bioavailability. Therefore, the selective inhibition of β-d-glucosidase from naringinase is crucial for improving the bioavailability of flavonoid glycosides. Achieving high process efficiency requires the development of a method that effectively inactivates β-d-glucosidase while maintaining high α-l-rhamnosidase activity. It may involve optimizing environmental conditions such as pH and temperature or using specific, preferably natural, inhibitors.

3.4.2. Hydrolysis of Hesperidin

Hesperidin is a flavonoid in citrus fruits, primarily oranges, lemons, tangelo, and limes [72]. It is relatively cheap and readily available and can be obtained from industrial orange peel waste, among others [53,72]. It is an excellent starting material for obtaining derivatives with greater antioxidant capacity [56]. Hesperidin contains the aglycone hesperetin and two sugar moieties, a rhamnosidic and a glucosidic moiety, linked by an α-1-6-glycosidic bond. There are two conversion pathways of hesperidin to hesperetin: hydrolysis of hesperidin catalyzed by α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase and direct hydrolysis of hesperidin by β-d-glucosidase (Figure 3).
Hesperidin can be deglycosylated by α-rhamnosidase to rhamnose and hesperetin 7-O-glucoside, which β-d-glucosidase then hydrolyzes to glucose and hesperetin [53,56,72]. In the second pathway, β-d-glucosidase catalyzes the cleavage of the glucosidic bond of hesperidin by removing the rutinosylglycoside, directly leading to the formation of hesperetin [54].
Often, only α-l-rhamnosidase is used to hydrolyze hesperidin, obtaining hesperetin 7-O-glucoside. As a product of hesperidin derhamnosylation, it is considered a synthetic precursor to new and effective sweeteners [54]. In addition, hesperetin 7-O-glucoside inhibits key maltase and cholesterol synthesis enzymes more effectively than hesperidin and its aglycone, thus showing practical anti-diabetic and cholesterol-lowering effects [55,56]. In addition, hesperetin 7-O-glucoside more effectively inhibits the growth of Helicobacter pylori [56]. It was also found to exert hypotensive and vasodilatory effects [55]. The results of a study on the hydrolysis of hesperidin in orange juice and seeds by naringinase from A. sojae indicate that it is more soluble than hesperidin, which affects its higher bioavailability [14,56]. The increased solubility of hesperidin and hesperetin is desirable for practical applications in the food industry [56].
Adding appropriate sugars to the hesperidin hydrolysis reaction environment can effectively achieve the controlled production of hesperetin 7-O-glucoside or hesperetin. Rhamnose inhibits the first step of hesperidin conversion and cuts off the α-l-rhamnosidase/β-d-glucosidase pathway, thus promoting the direct hydrolysis of hesperidin to hesperetin. Disaccharides (such as maltose and sucrose) and starch-containing glucosidic bonds also affected the production of hesperetin 7-O-glucoside and hesperetin [53]. Many authors have successfully hydrolyzed hesperidin using naringinase, as well as α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase (Table 2).
β-glucosidase from Pyrococcus furiosus was used to hydrolyze the flavonoid glycosides hesperidin, neohesperidin, naringin, and narirutin obtained from the citrus extracts of grapefruit seed, grapefruit pulp, and orange seed; β-glucosidase hydrolyzed the flavanone glycosides into their aglycones and disaccharides in a one-step reaction. β-glucosidase completely converted hesperidin in the orange peel extract to hesperetin within 9 h of reaction, yielding 1 g dm−3 h−1. The enzyme also efficiently hydrolyzed naringin and narirutin contained in grapefruit peel and flesh extract to naringenin. β-glucosidase from Pyrococcus furiosus may be helpful for the industrial hydrolysis of flavanone glycosides in citrus extracts [73].
Lee et al. [56] carried out the hydrolysis of hesperidin using naringinase from A. sojae, which has high α-l-rhamnosidase activity and relatively low β-d-glucosidase activity, to convert it into the intermediate product hesperetin 7-O-glucoside. Hesperidin in orange juice and peels was efficiently converted by α-l-rhamnosidase from naringinase to glucoside, producing a negligible amount of the aglycone hesperetin. The efficiency of hesperetin 7-O-glucoside production, relative to the amount of hesperidin found in the extracts, was estimated to be about 71% for orange juice and 78% for orange peel [56].
Kapoor et al. [74] obtained an inclusion complex of hesperetin 7-O-glucoside with β-cyclodextrin by enzymatic hydrolysis of hesperidin with naringinase in the presence of β-cyclodextrin. For this purpose, hesperidin and β-cyclodextrin were mixed in water at 70 °C, and the pH was adjusted to 4.5, followed by naringinase hydrolysis for 24 h. Under optimal conditions, the enzymatic conversion of hesperidin to hesperetin 7-O-glucoside occurred with an efficiency close to 98%. The results showed that the water solubility and thermal stability of hesperetin 7-O-glucoside were enhanced in the inclusion complex with β-cyclodextrin. It could lead to increased bioavailability of this glycoside [74].
Similarly to naringin hydrolysis, the production of hesperetin glucoside requires specific inactivation of β-d-glucosidase while maintaining high α-l-rhamnosidase activity.

3.4.3. Hydrolysis of Rutin

Rutin, hesperidin, and naringin are among the most common glycosylated flavonoids in buckwheat, apples, grapes, tomatoes, and citrus fruits [54]. Rutin contains a disaccharide grouping: α-l-ramnosyl-β-d-glucoside bonded to the flavonoid aglycone at position 3. Rutin, like hesperidin, can be readily available in large quantities and is of high quality at affordable prices, making it an ideal starting material for obtaining more valuable flavonoids, mainly isoquercitrin [54].
a-l-rhamnosidase from naringinase hydrolyzes rutin (quercetin 3-O-rutinoside) to rhamnose and quercetin 3-O-glucoside (quercetin-3-O-glucoside Q-3-G or isoquercitrin) [2,75,76]. β-d-glucosidase, in turn, hydrolyzes isoquercitrin to glucose and quercitrin (Figure 4).
Quercetin and isoquercitrin are compounds with a wide range of biological activity [75]. Quercetin, when administered orally, is poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and is reported to have an absorption rate of less than 1% [77].
Isoquercetin exhibits anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiproliferative properties and protects against atherosclerosis. In addition, isoquercetin is the primary synthetic precursor of enzyme-modified isoquercetin (EMIQ), derived from rutin produced by transglycosylation with cyclodextrin glucanotransferase. EMIQ isoquercetin, a commercial water-soluble flavonol glycoside, has been approved as a multicomponent food additive [78].
Table 3 summarizes studies on the hydrolysis of rutin by naringinase and its subunits.
Naringinase from P. decumbens was used to hydrolyze rutin to aglycone. Quercetin was obtained from rutin with 86% yield [2]. Naringinase has also been used to hydrolyze the rutin contained in buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum), leading to the formation of quercetin [81].
β-d-glucosidase activity is not desirable for obtaining monoglycosylated flavonoids via naringinase. It leads to the need for selective inhibitors and costly methods to purify α-l-rhamnosidase or inactivate β-d-glucosidase [2,77] while maintaining high residual α-rhamnosidase activity. For this purpose, Vila-Real et al. [2] selectively inactivated β-d-glucosidase naringinase from P. decumbens at 81.5° C and pH 3.9, retaining 78% of α-l-rhamnosidase activity, resulting in isoquercitrin with a 61% yield.
The enzymatic bioconversion of rutin to isoquercitrin was performed using naringinase from P. decumbens [77]. The researchers found that the process depends on the pH of the environment and is highest at pH 6.0. At acidic pH, the activity of α-l-rhamnosidase from naringinase increased, while β-d-glucosidase showed little enzymatic activity. Due to the removal of rhamnose by α-l-rhamnosidase, more than 92% of the rutin was hydrolyzed to isoquercitrin. The solubility of isoquercitrin in water increased by 69- and 328-fold compared to rutin and quercetin, respectively. Due to its increased solubility, isoquercitrin is a more effective and bioavailable food ingredient than rutin and quercetin.
Gerstorferová et al. [79] inactivated β-d-glucosidase at pH 8.0 and 70 °C, thereby obtaining only α-l-rhamnosidase activity from A. terreus. Recombinant α-l-rhamnosidase was also used in the study. cDNA of rhamnosidase was cloned from A. terreus, sequenced, and expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Both native and recombinant α-l-rhamnosidase efficiently catalyzed the conversion of rutin to isoquercitrin. Wang et al. [78] showed that hesperidinase, also containing α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase, could be used to produce isoquercitrin by selectively removing the terminal rhamnose from rutin. At pH 7.0, α-l-rhamnosidase hesperidinase showed good catalytic ability to produce isoquercitrin, while under these conditions, β-d-glucosidase lost enzymatic activity. In addition, increased conversion of rutin to isoquercitrin was noted by adding some metal ions (K+, Li+, Mg2+, Zn2+, and Al3+).
The antioxidant and antiproliferative potential of rutin was also studied after enzymatic hydrolysis carried out by α-l-rhamnosidase (hesperidinase from Penicillium sp. and naringinase from P. decumbens), previously heated to 70 °C for 30 min to inactivate the undesired activity of β-d-glucosidase. The antioxidant capacity of rutin increased by about 30% after 4 h of reaction with hesperidinase, while an increase of about 10% was observed with naringinase [82].
An ethanolic extract of mulberry fruit (Morus spp.) has been shown to exhibit anti-allergic activity, which is attributed to the presence of bioactive compounds such as cyanidin 3-rutinoside, cyanidin 3-glucoside, and rutin. Adding naringinase to the extract enhances the inhibitory effect on the allergic response in IgE-activated mast cells, probably through the enzymatic hydrolysis of rutin to quercetin, known for its potent anti-inflammatory and antihistamine properties. Combining mulberry extract with naringinase may, therefore, find application in treating allergic disorders and as an ingredient in health-promoting functional foods [83].

3.5. Production of Functional Beverages with Enhanced Antioxidant Activity

The properties of grapefruit juice treated with naringinase from P. decumbens and adsorbed by Amberlite IRA-400 were compared [24]. In addition to reducing the bitter taste of the juice, the antioxidant capacity was studied, as well as the protective effects on lipid peroxidation, glutathione oxidation, and DNA damage. In juice subjected to both enzymatic treatment and adsorption on ion exchange resin, naringin content was reduced, making the taste of both juices acceptable to consumers. However, the antioxidant potential and free radical scavenging capacity were higher in the naringinase-treated samples. In addition, juice containing the enzyme provided more excellent protection against glutathione oxidation and lipid peroxidation than juice treated with exchange resin. Both juices were equally effective in reducing hydroxyl-radical-induced DNA damage in a dose-dependent manner. It can be concluded that, to preserve the antioxidant capacity and protect the bio-molecules of freshly squeezed grapefruit juice, the enzymatic action with naringinase was more effective than physical adsorption.
The effects of α-l-rhamnosidase, β-d-glucosidase, and their combinations on the content of naringin, polyphenols, antioxidant activity, and flavor in orange juice were studied. Both α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase increased the content of antioxidants, flavonoids, and polyphenols in the juice. However, a better result was obtained by using both enzymes simultaneously. The simultaneous use of α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase showed more excellent antioxidant activity than the use of single α-l-rhamnosidase or β-d-glucosidase. Combining both enzymes also contributed to a significant improvement in the flavor and aroma of orange juice relative to single enzymes [84].
The bioconversion of orange (C. sinensis) and lime (C. latifolia) juices by α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase, alone or in combination, was also investigated to hydrolyze most of the flavonoid glycosides in the juices and obtain derivatives with higher antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity of both enzyme-reactivated juices was higher than those without enzymes. The antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH method of orange juice increased by about 30% after 4 h of reaction with naringinase. Enzyme-treated lime juice did not show higher antioxidant activity [1].
α-rhamnosidase and β-glucosidase can be used in producing Ginko tea or tea beverages to produce products with a higher content of flavonoids, ginkgolides, and aromatic components. This tea is a type of health food made from Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo biloba) leaves; however, consumers do not accept the product due to its unpleasant taste. The flavor was improved through enzymatic deglycosylation of many flavone glycosides, and bioactive compounds from ginkgo tea leaves were released. In addition, the bioconversion of flavonoids and ginkgolides to their bioactive absorptive forms was increased [50].
The health-promoting properties of polyphenols present in fruits, vegetables, and other foods such as juices, tea, and wine have been widely studied in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo [52,56,85].
Grapefruit juice may be a potential growth medium for lactic acid bacteria. Tran et al. [9] developed and carried out a process to simultaneously remove bitterness and produce probiotic grapefruit juice by using naringinase from probiotic bacteria in simultaneous fermentation and reduction in naringin concentration. The grapefruit juice was fermented with mono and mixed probiotic cultures that showed a high capacity to produce naringinase, i.e., L. plantarum 01, L. rhamnosus B01725, L. fermentum D13, and B. bifidum B7.5 strains. It resulted in a reduction in naringin concentration by about 28% after 24 h. Imece et al. [86] added the probiotic bacteria L. plantarum ACC 54, L. plantarum ACC 28, and L. plantarum 250, which exhibit naringinase activity, to grapefruit juice. The tested Lactobacillus strains were able to reduce the concentration of naringin. After three days, an improvement in the physicochemical properties of grapefruit juice was observed. However, the long storage period caused some changes in physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity, and total phenolic content.
The lactic fermentation of fruit juice provides a “functional food” because it contains bioactive compounds such as fiber, oligosaccharides, and bacteria that promote intestinal microflora balance [9].
Pure Clavispora lusitaniae yeast, isolated from whey beverages, was used to make a low-alcohol, naturally carbonated, fermented, bitter grapefruit beverage. The grapefruit juice is also a medium for the naringinase-producing yeast C. lusitaniae. After three months of refrigerated storage, the concentration of naringin was reduced by 43%. The resulting beverage contained 0.76% alcohol [11]. Sahota and Kaur [87] used C. lusitaniae yeast to produce a low-alcohol, naturally carbonated, fermented beverage from kinnow. Purified naringinase from the same yeast was added to remove the bitter taste of kinnow fruit under optimized fermentation conditions (temperature 50 °C, pH 4). A similar study on kinnow juice with C. lusitaniae yeast, during a 3-month storage period at 4 °C, observed reductions in the concentrations of limonin and naringin of 54 and 64.8%, respectively.
The effect of naringinase on enhancing the antioxidant activity of beverages depends on their composition, particularly alcohol content, and pH, which may limit the enzyme’s effectiveness. Prolonged storage can also alter the beverages’ antioxidant activity and physicochemical properties.

3.6. Other Applications of Naringinase and Its Subunits

Sugar and natural sweeteners are important additives that improve the taste of food items. Natural sweeteners are in high demand due to growing health concerns about sugar consumption. α-l-rhamnosidase and β-glucosidase are used in the production of sweeteners.
β-d-glucosidase from naringinase can be used in steviol production by detaching glucose molecules from stevioside. Steviol glycosides from the leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (Compositae) or Stevia suavissimus (Rosaceae) share the same aglycone–steviol. They differ in the content of carbohydrate residues, that is, mono-, di- and trisaccharides containing glucose and/or rhamnose at the C-13 and C-19 positions. These structural differences give the glycosides their relative sweetness and flavor quality. The main glycosides are stevioside, rubusoside, steviol monoglucoside, steviol monoglucosyl ester, and steviolbioside. Steviol is an important aglycone of steviol glucosides, providing an alternative to sucrose, and is also used as a pharmaceutical compound to improve cognitive functions such as learning, memory, alertness, and psychotic stability, as well as a plant growth factor. These compounds also have immunomodulatory properties and protect against hyperglycemia, hypertension, inflammation, cancer, and diarrhea [88].
β-glucosidase has hydrolyzing activity against stevioside, rubusoside, steviol monoglucoside, and steviol monoglucosyl ester. The β-glucosidase can hydrolyze steviosides to rubusoside, steviolbioside, and steviol monoglucoside, and then to steviol [89]. Purified β-glucosidase naringinase from P. decumbens was used to hydrolyze steviol glycosides. The enzyme produced steviol by hydrolyzing rubusoside and steviol monoglucoside. The yield for obtaining steviol using β-glucosidase is 64% from a 47 mM stevioside solution at 55 °C and pH 4.0 [88]. Using naringinase from Penicillium sp., Nguyen et al. [90] converted stevioside to rubusoside with a yield of about 51%. Rubusoside is a sweetener and a solubilizing agent what can be used in the pharmaceutical industry [44].
α-l-rhamnosidase is also used in the production of sweeteners. Through a combination of hydrogenation and enzymatic hydrolysis reactions, α-l-rhamnosidase can produce the natural sweetener dihydrochalcone glycoside trilobatin. In this method, naringin isolated from citrus waste was hydrogenated to dihydrochalcone, from which the rhamnose molecule was then detached using immobilized α-l-rhamnosidase as a catalyst [91].
Beverages containing one or more steviol glycosides, such as rebaudioside A, rebaudioside D, and rebaudioside M, may exhibit an insufficiently sweet taste compared to the initial sweetness in sugar-sweetened beverages. Naringenin, an aglycone of naringin, can be added to beverages to improve the perception of sweet taste. Naringenin can be used as a beverage additive or an ingredient in a sweetener composition to adjust the sweetness attributes of beverages [92]. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) approved the use of naringenin as a flavoring in food [93].
The production of natural sweeteners other than sucrose requires using one of the enzymes present in naringinase, which necessitates the development of an effective method for the selective inactivation of the other enzyme. Research in this area has emerged relatively recently and still requires further intensive investigation.
Tilianin, a rare flavonol glycoside, is gaining increasing attention for its various biological properties, including sedative, antihypertensive, and anticonvulsant effects. However, it is relatively expensive and difficult to obtain due to its low content in plants. A selective and efficient linear biotransformation process has been developed to produce thylacine by naringinase. Linarin contains a rutinoside attached to the C-7 site of acacetin and can be converted to tilianin (acacetin-7-O-β-d-glucoside) by selective hydrolysis of the rhamnosyl group by naringinase. It has been shown that temperature can modulate the activity of α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase from naringinase. Under optimized conditions (pH 7, 60 °C), linarin was almost wholly converted to thylanine (98.9%) [14,15,94]. Using naringinase to produce tilianin requires neutral pH and elevated temperature, which are often not optimal conditions for the enzyme’s activity.
In addition, naringinase and hesperidinase can aid in extracting proteins from grapefruit seeds remaining after cold-pressing the oil. Incubation of crushed seeds with these enzymes prior to protein extraction leads to a reduction in viscosity, which may facilitate protein extraction. These results suggest potential applications of grapefruit seed proteins in the food industry as food enrichment ingredients, animal nutrition, and other industrial applications [85].
The action of naringinase can affect the chemical and physical properties of mesocarp powder from the bitter fruit of Borassus flabellifer. Naringinase-reduced mesocarp powder has good water retention, swelling, and wettability. Naringinase reduced the particle size of the mesocarp by 33.2%, causing an increase in its surface area. The larger surface area retains more water/oil molecules, contributing to higher water/oil capacity. However, the mesocarp powder’s solubility, swelling, and wettability were markedly reduced after naringinase treatment. Due to naringinase-mediated deagglomeration, Borassus flabellifermma mesocarp powder has the potential as a functional ingredient to increase fiber content in products that require hydration, low calorie content, and high fiber content, such as pasta, energy bars, and breakfast cereals [95].
Naringinase can also be used to produce soy-based foods to enrich them with free isoflavones. Isoflavones are polyphenolic molecules present in soybeans that have antioxidant and phytoestrogenic properties. Some isoflavones are present in the form of a free aglycone (e.g., daidzein, genistein, and glycitin) or their respective glucoside conjugate (e.g., daidzein, genistein and glycitin). In soybeans, isoflavones are mainly found in the glucoside-bound form. However, isoflavones in aglycone form show higher bioavailability [44]. Soy extracts were biotransformed with tannase from Paecilomyces variotii and immobilized β-glucosidase from naringinase from P. decumbens. As a result of the enzymatic processes, there were significant changes in the profiles of isoflavones in the soy beverage due to the bioconversion of glycosidic forms (daidzin and genistein) into aglycone forms (daidzein and genistein) [96].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this review underscores the importance of naringinase in the food industry, and the information available in scientific publications can significantly help guide the application of this enzyme. Naringinase is widely used to improve the quality of food products because it can hydrolyze compounds linked to rhamnose or glucose. The most talked about use of naringinase is to improve flavor and aroma in the juice and wine industries. The proposed solutions in this area, using free and immobilized enzymes, indicate their potential industrial application. This review also presents other potential applications of naringinase in food technology. Naringinase, selectively hydrolyzing naringin, hesperidin, and rutin, contributes to the increased bioavailability of flavonoids. From the perspective of selective flavonoid hydrolysis, it is essential to develop conditions that allow effort the effective deactivation of β-d-glucosidase while maintaining maximum activity of α-l-rhamnosidase, the second enzyme in the naringinase complex. Deglycosylation of flavonoids solely by α-l-rhamnosidase, resulting in glucoside-containing compounds, can enhance their bioavailability. Therefore, inhibition of β-d-glucosidase from naringinase is crucial for improving the absorption of flavonoid glycosides. Additionally, β-glucosidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of polysaccharides into simple sugars, which increases blood glucose levels. Inhibiting their activity slows carbohydrate digestion and may be beneficial in managing metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes—one of the significant health challenges of the 21st century. Ideally, β-d-glucosidase inhibitors should be of natural origin, with promising candidates including hibiscus or Hericium erinaceus (lion’s mane). Inhibition can also be achieved by adjusting reaction conditions to favor high α-l-rhamnosidase activity with minimal β-d-glucosidase activity. Moreover, enhancing α-l-rhamnosidase activity through stabilization at elevated temperatures may further support targeted flavonoid deglycosylation. Another approach may be to develop, using genetic engineering methods, strains of microorganisms synthesizing naringinase with high α-l-rhamnosidase activity and low β-d-glucosidase activity.
Hydrolyzing polyphenols increases the antioxidant capacity of products. It can also produce functional beverages with increased amounts of bioactive flavonoids. α-l-rhamnosidase and β-glucosidase from naringinase are used to produce sweeteners and can be used in the soy products industry.
The presented applications of the enzyme result from the ability of naringinase to deglycosylate the compounds present in food. Deglycosylation of other, as-yet-unexplored substrates of naringinase may lead to bioactive compounds with new industrial applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30112376/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.-B. and Z.G.; methodology, J.B.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.-B.; writing—review and editing, Z.G.; supervision, Z.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used for the research described in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Hes-7-Ghesperetin 7-O-glucoside

References

  1. da Silva, C.M.G.; Contesini, F.J.; Sawaya, A.C.F.; Cabral, E.C.; da Silva Cunha, I.B.; Eberlin, M.N.; de Oliveira Carvalho, P. Enhancement of the antioxidant activity of orange and lime juices by flavonoid enzymatic de-glycosylation. Food Res. Int. 2013, 52, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vila-Real, H.; Alfaia, A.J.; Bronze, M.R.; Calado, A.R.T.; Ribeiro, M.H.L. Enzymatic synthesis of the flavone glucosides prunin and isoquercetin, and the aglycones, naringenin and quercetin, with selective α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase activities of naringinase. Enzyme Res. 2011, 2011, 692618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Puri, M. Updates on naringinase: Structural and biotechnological aspects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Selim, M.S.; Abo Elsoud, M.M.; Sanad, M.N.M.E.; Elattal, N.A.; Rifaat, H.M.; Mohamed, S.S. Enzymatic debittering of citrus juices: Optimization, modeling, and characterization of naringinase production from marine Bacillus subtilis strain BSnari. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 53, 102853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ni, H.; Chen, F.; Cai, H.; Xiao, A.; You, Q.; Lu, Y. Characterization and preparation of Aspergillus niger naringinase for debittering citrus juice. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C1–C7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patil, M.B.; Dhake, A.B. Debittering of citrus fruit juice by naringinase of Penicillium purpurogenum. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol. 2014, 3, 266–270. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhu, Y.; Jia, H.; Xi, M.; Xu, L.; Wu, S.; Li, X. Purification and characterization of a naringinase from a newly isolated strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 11568 suitable for the transformation of flavonoids. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Borzova, N.; Gudzenko, O.; Varbanets, L. Purification and characterization of a naringinase from Cryptococcus albidus. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 184, 953–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tran, A.M.; Nguyen, T.B.; Nguyen, V.D.; Bujna, E.; Dam, M.S.; Nguyen, Q.D. Changes in bitterness, antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of grapefruit juice fermented by Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Acta Aliment. 2020, 49, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balaraman, H.; Purushotaman, C.; Chandramouliswaran, K.; Rathnasamy, S. Simultaneous production and sustainable eutectic mixture based purification of naringinase with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by valorization of tofu wastewater. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pandove, G.; Sahota, P.; Gupta, N.; Singh, P. Production of low-alcoholic naturally carbonated fermented debittered beverage from W. Murcott mandarin (Citrus reticulata) by naringinase-producing yeast. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2016, 14, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pegu, B.K.; Kardong, D.; Chutia, J.; Gogoi, D.K.; Buragohain, M. Microbial naringinase and its applications in debittering technology–A mini review. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2021, 14, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Golgeri, M.D.B.; Mulla, S.I.; Bagewadi, Z.K.; Faniband, B.; Mishra, P.; Bankole, P.O.; Sharma, S.; Américo-Pinheiro, J.H.P.; Bharagava, R.N.; Romanholo Ferreira, L.F. Microbial naringinase: From microbial source to its current applications in various fields. Biologia 2025, 80, 977–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yadav, M.; Sehrawat, N.; Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, A. Naringinase: Microbial sources, production and applications in food processing industry. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2018, 8, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, Y.; Zhong, X.; Hu, X.; Tian, S.; Fan, G. Research progress on microbial naringinase. J. Henan Univ. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2024, 45, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xia, X.K.; Zhang, Y.E.; Lei, S.J.; Hu, B.; Fu, C.X. Identification and iterative combinatorial mutagenesis of a new naringinase-producing strain, Aspergillus tubingensis MN589840. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 72, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patil, S.V.; Koli, S.H.; Mohite, B.V.; Patil, R.P.; Patil, R.R.; Borase, H.P.; Patil, V.S. A novel screening method for potential naringinase-producing microorganisms. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2019, 66, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadłek, J.; Sadłek, W. Biodostępna Kompozycja Flawonoidów Zawierających Ramnozę Oraz Jej Zastosowanie. PL Patent (11) 229133, 15 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Holt, S.; Miks, M.H.; Carvalho, B.T.; Thevelein, J.M.; Foulquié, M.R.; Thevelein, J.M. The molecular biology of fruity and floral aromas in beer and other alcoholic beverages. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 193–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, J.; Garncarek, Z. Zastosowanie naringinazy w technologii soków i win. Pr. Nauk. UE Wroc. 2017, 494, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferreira, L.; Afonso, C.; Vila-Real, H.; Alfaia, A. Evaluation of the effect of high pressure on naringin hydrolysis in grapefruit juice with naringinase immobilised in calcium alginate beads. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 46, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  23. Muñoz, M.; Holtheuer, J.; Wilson, L.; Urrutia, P. Grapefruit debittering by simultaneous naringin hydrolysis and limonin adsorption using naringinase immobilized in agarose supports. Molecules 2022, 27, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cavia-Saiz, M.; Muñiz, P.; Ortega, N.; Busto, M.D. Effect of enzymatic debittering on antioxidant capacity and protective role against oxidative stress of grapefruit juice in comparison with adsorption on exchange resin. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ribeiro, I.A.; Ribeiro, M.H.L. Naringin and naringenin determination and control in grapefruit juice by a validated HPLC method. Food Control 2008, 19, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lei, S.; Xu, Y.; Fan, G.; Xiao, M.; Pan, S. Immobilization of naringinase on mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41 and its application to debittering of white grapefruit. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 4096–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. da Silva, G.O.; Marapana, R.; Manawaduge, R. Effect of naringinase enzymatic treatment on the bitter compound naringin in fresh juice of “Bibila sweet” oranges. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 174–178. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang, W.; Zhan, Y.; Shi, X.; Chen, J.; Deng, H.; Du, Y. Controllable immobilization of naringinase on electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers and their application to juice debittering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, J.; Garncarek, Z. Immobilization of naringinase from Penicillium decumbens on chitosan microspheres for debittering grapefruit juice. Molecules 2019, 24, 4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Housseiny, M.M.; Aboelmagd, H.I. Nano-encapsulation of naringinase produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum ATCC18648 on thermally stable biopolymers for citrus juice debittering. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gonzalez-Temino, Y.; Ruíz, M.O.; Ortega, N.; Ramos, G.S. Immobilization of naringinase on asymmetric organic membranes: Application for debittering of grapefruit juice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 73, 102790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singla, G.; Panesar, P.S.; Sangwan, R.S.; Krishania, M. Enzymatic processing of Citrus reticulata (Kinnow) pomace using naringinase and its valorization through preparation of nutritionally enriched pasta. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 3853–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, M.; Pareek, V. Minimization of limonin and naringin content in Kinnow juice using response surface methodology. Ann. Biol. 2022, 38, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gupta, A.K.; Rather, M.A.; Mishra, P. Design and development of laboratory scale batch type device for debittering of bitter citrus juice. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sihmar, D.; Ray, A.B. Optimization of physical and enzymatic debittering methods for grapefruit juice. J. Appl. Hortic. 2023, 25, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, L.; Zhu, S.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Yu, M. Fermentation optimization of naringinase from a screened strain of Serratia marcescens C10 through response surface methodology. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 15621–15634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Urrutia, P.; Arrieta, R.; Torres, C.; Guerrero, C.; Wilson, L. Amination of naringinase to improve citrus juice debittering using a catalyst immobilized on glyoxyl-agarose. Food Chem. 2024, 452, 139600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kimmins, S.D.; Henríquez, A.; Torres, C.; Wilson, L.; Flores, M.; Pio, E.; Jullian, D.; Urbano, B.; Braun-Galleani, S.; Ottone, C.; et al. Immobilization of naringinase onto polydopamine-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for juice debittering applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Devi, G.N.; Sangavi, G.; Chakravarthy, M.; Sweetlin, J.L. Isolation, production optimization, and purification of a debittering enzyme from Bacillus megaterium Auls 1. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2024, 38, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Del Nobile, M.A.; Piergiovanni, L.; Buonocore, G.G.; Fava, P.; Puglisi, M.L.; Nicolais, L. Naringinase immobilization in polymeric films intended for food packaging applications. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jeong, H.; Rani, P.; Kim, H.; Eun, A.; Lee, B.; Yang, K.; Nam, S. A combination of commercial and traditional food-source-derived enzymatic treatment acts as a potential tool to produce functional yuzu (Citrus junos) powder. Food Chem. X 2023, 20, 100918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seong, H.-J.; Kim, H.; Cho, J.-Y.; Yang, K.-Y.; Nam, S.-H. Modulating flavanone compound for reducing the bitterness and improving dietary fiber, physicochemical properties, and anti-adipogenesis of green yuzu powder by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. de Morais Souto, B.; Florentino Barbosa, M.; Marinsek Sales, R.M.; Conessa Moura, S.; de Rezende Bastos Araújo, A.; Ferraz Quirino, B. The potential of β-glucosidases for aroma and flavor improvement in the food industry. Microbe 2023, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. González-Pombo, P.; Fariña, L.; Carrau, F.; Batista-Viera, F.; Brena, B.M. Aroma enhancement in wines using co-immobilized Aspergillus niger glycosidases. Food Chem. 2014, 143, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ni, H.; Hong, P.; Ji, H.F.; Sun, H.; Chen, Y.H.; Xiao, A.F.; Chen, F. Comparative analyses of aromas of fresh, naringinase-treated and resin-absorbed juices of pummelo by GC-MS and sensory evaluation. Flavour Fragr. J. 2015, 30, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ni, H.; Yang, Y.F.; Chen, F.; Ji, H.F.; Yang, H.; Ling, W.; Cai, H.N. Pectinase and naringinase help to improve juice production and quality from pummelo (Citrus grandis) fruit. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Michlmayr, H.; Brandes, W.; Eder, R.; Schümann, C.; del Hierro, A.M.; Kulbe, K.D. Characterization of two distinct glycosyl hydrolase family 78 α-l-rhamnosidases from Pediococcus acidilactici. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6524–6530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gao, X.; Feng, T.; Liu, E.; Shan, P.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, L.; Ma, H. Ougan juice debittering using ultrasound-aided enzymatic hydrolysis: Impacts on aroma and taste. Food Chem. 2021, 345, 128767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ni, H.; Jiang, Q.; Lin, Q.; Ma, Q.; Wang, L.; Weng, S.; Huang, G.; Li, L.; Chen, F. Enzymatic hydrolysis and auto-isomerization during β-glucosidase treatment improve the aroma of instant white tea infusion. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fang, X.; Dong, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Cao, F. Effects of β-glucosidase and α-rhamnosidase on the contents of flavonoids, ginkgolides, and aroma components in ginkgo tea drink. Molecules 2019, 24, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ladole, M.R.; Pokale, P.B.; Varude, V.R.; Belokar, P.G.; Pandit, A.B. One-pot clarification and debittering of grapefruit juice using co-immobilized enzymes@chitosanMNPs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 1297–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumar, S.; Joshi, J.; Kumar, V.; Gautam, P.; Singh, S.; Kohli, D. Effect of immobilized enzymes naringinase and tannase produced from Aspergillus sp. isolate MK156394 isolated from rotten pomelo on quality characteristics of Citrus limetta juice and process optimization by using response surface methodology. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 9646–9657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zou, Y.; Xin, X.; Xu, H.; Yuan, H.; Li, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, G. Highly efficient bioconversion of flavonoid glycosides from citrus-processing wastes in solvent-buffer systems. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 3196–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Slámová, K.; Kapešová, J.; Valentová, K. “Sweet flavonoids”: Glycosidase-catalyzed modifications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, J.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Ni, H.; Chen, F.; Li, Q. Adding sorbitol improves the thermostability of α-l-rhamnosidase from. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 46, e14055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, Y.S.; Huh, J.Y.; Nam, S.H.; Moon, S.K.; Lee, S.B. Enzymatic bioconversion of citrus hesperidin by Aspergillus sojae naringinase: Enhanced solubility of hesperetin-7-O-glucoside with in vitro inhibition of human intestinal maltase, HMG-CoA reductase, and growth of Helicobacter pylori. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2253–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, A.; Huang, B.; Lei, L.; Lu, Y.-J.; Zhou, J.-L.; Wong, W.-L. Production of high antioxidant activity flavonoid monoglucosides from citrus flavanone with immobilised α-l-rhamnosidase in one step. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2854–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moriwaki, M.; Kito, K.; Nakagawa, R.; Kapoor, M.P.; Matsumiya, Y.; Fukuhara, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Satomoto, K.; Yamagata, H.; Kuroiwa, Y. Increased bioavailability of diosmetin-7-glucoside-γ-cyclodextrin inclusion complex compared with diosmin in Sprague-Dawley rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2023, 87, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moriwaki, M.; Tominaga, E.; Kito, K.; Nakagawa, R.; Kapoor, M.P.; Matsumiya, Y.; Fukuhara, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Satomoto, K.; Yamagata, H.; et al. Bioavailability of flavonoids in Ginkgo biloba extract-γ-cyclodextrin complex. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2023, 18, 1934578X231170221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zheng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Ming, Y.; Lin, M.; Chen, L.; Huang, W.; Xiao, J.; Lin, H. Gynosaponin TN-1 producing from the enzymatic conversion of gypenoside XLVI by naringinase and its cytotoxicity on hepatoma cell lines. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 119, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Ming, Y.; Bai, Y.; Chen, L.; Huang, W.; Lin, M.; Liu, S.; Xiao, J.; Lin, H. Compound K producing from the enzymatic conversion of gypenoside by naringinase. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 130, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Lai, X.; Nong, J.; Zhao, G.; Xiao, X. One-pot biocatalytic synthesis and antioxidant activities of highly lipophilic naringin derivatives by using bi-functional whole-cells. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Carceller, J.M.; Martínez Galán, J.P.; Monti, R.; Bassan, J.C.; Filice, M.; Yu, J.; Corma, A. Selective synthesis of citrus flavonoids prunin and naringenin using heterogeneized biocatalyst on graphene oxide. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Seong, H.J.; Im, A.E.; Kim, H.; Park, N.; Yang, K.Y.; Kim, D.; Nam, S.H. Production of prunin and naringenin by using naringinase from Aspergillus oryzae NYO-2 and their neuroprotective properties and debitterization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 1655–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chang, H.Y.; Lee, Y.B.; Bae, H.A.; Huh, J.Y.; Nam, S.H.; Sohn, H.S.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.B. Purification and characterisation of Aspergillus sojae naringinase: The production of prunin exhibiting markedly enhanced solubility with in vitro inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Q.; Zhang, N.; Sun, X.; Zhan, H.; Tian, J.; Fei, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y. Controllable biotransformation of naringin to prunin by naringinase immobilized on functionalized silica. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaur, A.; Singh, S.; Singh, R.S.; Schwarz, W.H.; Puri, M. Hydrolysis of citrus peel naringin by recombinant α-l-rhamnosidase from Clostridium stercorarium. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1419–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carceller, J.M.; Martínez Galán, J.P.; Monti, R.; Bassan, J.C.; Filice, M.; Yu, J.; Corma, A. Covalent immobilization of naringinase over two-dimensional 2D zeolites and its applications in a continuous process to produce citrus flavonoids and for debittering of juices. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 4502–4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salunkhe, J.D.; Mohite, B.V.; Patil, S.V. Naringenin biosynthesis and fabrication of naringenin mediated nano silver conjugate for antimicrobial potential. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 3184–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, C.; Chen, P.-X.; Xiao, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, F.-Q.; Yang, Q.-M.; Weng, H.-F.; Fang, B.-S.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Xiao, A.-F. Artificial naringinase system for cooperative enzymatic synthesis of naringenin. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 178, 108277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Luo, C.M.; Zhang, W.T.; Xie, S.Y.; Zhuang, X.Y.; Guo, Z.W.; Xiao, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, F.Q.; Yang, Q.M.; Ru, Y.; et al. Engineering artificial fusion naringinase for enhancing naringenin biosynthesis. Biochem. Eng. J. 2024, 205, 109253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mazzaferro, L.S.; Breccia, J.D. Quantification of hesperidin in citrus-based foods using a fungal diglycosidase. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2338–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shin, K.-C.; Nam, H.-K.; Oh, D.-K. Hydrolysis of flavanone glycosides by β-glucosidase from Pyrococcus furiosus and its application to the production of flavanone aglycones from citrus extracts. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11532–11540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kapoor, M.P.; Moriwaki, M.; Minoura, K.; Timm, D.; Abe, A.; Kito, K. Structural investigation of hesperetin-7-O-glucoside inclusion complex with β-cyclodextrin: A spectroscopic assessment. Molecules 2022, 27, 5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhu, D.; Gong, A.; Xu, Y.; Kinfack Tsabing, D.; Wu, F.; Wang, J. Isoquercitrin production from rutin catalyzed by naringinase under ultrasound irradiation. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 134, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gong, A.; Zhu, C.T.; Xu, Y.; Wang, F.Q.; Tsabing, D.K.; Wu, F.A.; Wang, J. Moving and unsinkable graphene sheets immobilized enzyme for microfluidic biocatalysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lee, Y.-S.; Huh, J.-Y.; Nam, S.-H.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.-B. Synthesis of Quercetin-3-O-Glucoside from Rutin by Penicillium decumbens Naringinase. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, C411–C415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, J.; Ma, Y.; Wu, X.; Yu, L.; Xia, R.; Sun, G.; Wu, F. Selective hydrolysis by commercially available hesperidinase for isoquercitrin production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2012, 81, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gerstorferová, D.; Fliedrová, B.; Halada, P.; Marhol, P.; Křen, V.; Weignerová, L. Recombinant α-l-rhamnosidase from Aspergillus terreus in selective trimming of rutin. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhu, L.-L.; Zhu, C.-T.; Xiong, M.; Jin, C.-Q.; Sheng, S.; Wu, F.-A.; Wang, J. Enzyme immobilization on photopatterned temperature-response poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) for microfluidic biocatalysis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 1670–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Weiz, G.; Breccia, J.D.; Mazzaferro, L.S. Screening and quantification of the enzymatic deglycosylation of the plant flavonoid rutin by UV–visible spectrometry. Food Chem. 2017, 229, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. de Araujo, M.E.; Moreira Franco, Y.E.; Alberto, T.G.; Sobreiro, M.A.; Conrado, M.A.; Priolli, D.G.; Frankland Sawaya, A.C.H.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; de Carvalho, J.E.; Carvalho, P. de O. Enzymatic de-glycosylation of rutin improves its antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yoo, J.M.; Kim, N.Y.; Seo, J.M.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, H.D.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, M.R. Inhibitory effects of mulberry fruit extract in combination with naringinase on the allergic response in IgE-activated RBL-2H3 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 33, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Peng, C.; Li, R.; Ni, H.; Li, L.J.; Li, Q.B. The effects of α-l-rhamnosidase, β-d-glucosidase, and their combination on the quality of orange juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Karabiber, E.B.; Yılmaz, E. Extraction and characterisation of lemon, orange and grapefruit seeds press cake proteins. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2017, 9, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. İmece, A.; Şengül, M.; Çetin, B.; Aktaş, H. Effect of probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains on some properties of grapefruit juice and naringin. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2024, 108, 102359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sahota, P.P.; Kaur, N. Characterization of enzyme naringinase and the production of debittered low alcoholic kinnow (Citrus reticulata blanco). Int. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 3, 1220–1233. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ko, J.A.; Ryu, Y.B.; Kwon, H.J.; Jeong, H.J.; Park, S.J.; Kim, C.Y.; Wee, Y.J.; Kim, D.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, Y.M. Characterization of a novel steviol-producing β-glucosidase from Penicillium decumbens and optimal production of the steviol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8151–8161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nguyen, T.T.H.; Seo, C.; Kwak, S.H.; Kim, J.; Kang, H.K.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, D. Enzymatic production of steviol glucosides using β-glucosidase and their applications. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology; Issue Chapter 23; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 405–418. [Google Scholar]
  90. Nguyen, T.T.H.; Jung, S.; Kang, H.; Kim, Y.; Moon, Y.; Kim, M.; Kim, D. Production of rubusoside from stevioside by using a thermostable lactase from Thermus thermophilus and solubility enhancement of liquiritin and teniposide. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2014, 64, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lei, L.; Huang, B.; Liu, A.; Lu, Y.-J.; Zhou, J.-L.; Zhang, J.; Wong, W.-L. Enzymatic production of natural sweetener trilobatin from citrus flavanone naringin using immobilised α-l-rhamnosidase as the catalyst. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 2097–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Walton, S.; Olcese, G. Sweet Taste Improving Compositions Including Naringenin. U.S. Patent No. 10,231,474, 12 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
  93. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings; Castle, L.; Degen, G.; Engel, H.; Fowler, P.J.; José, M.; Fernandez, F.; Fürst, P.; Gürtler, R.R.; Husøy, T.; et al. Flavouring Group Evaluation 413 (FGE. 413): Naringenin. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e8747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cui, P.; Dou, T.Y.; Li, S.Y.; Lu, J.X.; Zou, L.W.; Wang, P.; Sun, Y.P.; Hao, D.C.; Ge, G.B. Highly selective and efficient biotransformation of linarin to produce tilianin by naringinase. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 1367–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rodiah, M.H.; Jamilah, B.; Norhayati, H.; Kharidah, M. Debittering of Borassus flabellifer mesocarp using naringinase: Impact on the composition, physicochemical characteristics, and functional properties. Malays. J. Sci. 2023, 42, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rejane, A.; Ávila, A.; de Alves, G.; Juliana, M.; Macedo, A. Exploring in vitro effects of biotransformed isoflavones extracts: Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antilipogenic. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart of the selection process for the included studies.
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart of the selection process for the included studies.
Molecules 30 02376 g001
Figure 2. Reaction scheme of the naringin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Figure 2. Reaction scheme of the naringin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Molecules 30 02376 g002
Figure 3. Reaction scheme of the hesperidin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Figure 3. Reaction scheme of the hesperidin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Molecules 30 02376 g003
Figure 4. Reaction scheme of the rutin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Figure 4. Reaction scheme of the rutin hydrolysis catalyzed by naringinase.
Molecules 30 02376 g004
Table 1. Debittering of citrus juices using naringinase.
Table 1. Debittering of citrus juices using naringinase.
Form of Enzyme UsedSource of EnzymeProductCondition of Juice DebitteringReduction in NaringinReferences
Naringinase immobilized in calcium alginate beadP. decumbensOrange juice160 MPa, 37 °C, 20 min 500 enzyme mg·dm−3 juice)75%[22]
Naringinase entrapped in k-carrageenan beadsP. decumbensGrapefruit juice30 °C, 120 min, 4 (juice): 1 (k-carrageenan beads enzyme)70%[25]
Free naringinaseP. decumbensGrapefruit juice20 °C, 24 h, 25 cm3 juice, naringinase (0.4 U·cm−3),46.8%[24]
Naringinase immobilized on mesoporous silica-White grapefruit juice60 °C, 30 min95.03%[26]
Free naringinaseA. nigerHoney pomelo juice40 °C, 60 minabout 90%[5]
Free naringinaseP. purpurogenumGrapefruit juice40 °C, 4 h
100 U of enzyme/100 cm3 juice
74%[7]
Free naringinaseA. oryzaePomelo juice45 °C, 60 minapproximately 99%[6]
Free naringinase-“Bibila sweet” oranges50 °C, 4 h
1.0 g of enzyme/dm3 juice
86%[27]
Naringinase immobilized on electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers-Grapefruit juice-22.72%[28]
Free naringinaseC. albidusGrapefruit juice40 °C and 60 °C, 60 min84% and 100%[8]
Naringinase immobilized on chitosan microspheres activated with glutaraldehydeA. nigerGrapefruit juice40 °C, 5 h75%[29]
Naringinase encapsulated in nano-chitosan and nano-alginateT. longibrachiatumGrapefruit juice50 °C, 60 min50.5% and 44.15%[30]
Naringinase immobilized on polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membraneP. decumbensGrapefruit juice45–50 °C 0.025 MPa50.1 ± 0.3%[31]
Free naringinaseThermomicrobia sp.Kinnow juice
pomace
50 °C, pH 4.5, 4 h,65.95%[32]
Free naringinaseA. nigerKinnow juiceRoom temperature, 12 h40.0%[33]
Naringinase immobilized in agarose supportsA. aculeatus/A. nigerGrapefruit juice30 °C, 24 h74%[23]
Free naringinaseB. amyloliquefaciensGrape juice37 °C, 20 min23.4%[10]
Free naringinaseB. subtilisLemon, grapefruit, orange, and mandarin4 h, 40–50 °C33–36%[4]
Naringinase adsorbed onto a macroporous resinA. nigerPomelo juice60 °C, 160 min53.06%[34]
Free naringinase-Grapefruit juice35 °C, 3 h 50 min55.77%[35]
Free naringinaseSerratia marcescensGrapefruit juice55 °C, 90 min85.93%[36]
Naringinase chemically aminated prior to its immobilization on glyoxyl-agaroseA. aculeatus/A. nigerGrapefruit juice30 °C, 24 h74%[37]
Naringinase immobilizes onto polydopamine-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticlesA. aculeatus/A. nigerGrapefruit juice50 °C, 24 h56%[38]
Free naringinaseBacillus megateriumLemon and tangerine juice37 °C45.78% (lemon juice) 42.71% (tangerine juice)[39]
Table 2. The use of naringinase for the hydrolysis of hesperidin.
Table 2. The use of naringinase for the hydrolysis of hesperidin.
Form of EnzymeSource of EnzymeProductCondition of Juice DebitteringResultsReferences
Free naringinaseA. sojaeOrange juice/orange peel37 °C, 24 h, enzyme solution: 1.7–2 mg/mLProduction yield of Hes-7-G * was 71% for orange juice and 78% for orange peel[56]
α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidaseA. nigerReaction mixture (20 mg of hesperidin and 40 mg of freeze-dried whole-cell catalysts was mixed with 2 cm3 of acetate buffer)pH 5.0, 40 °C, 24 h93.9 ± 1.4% conversion of hesperidin; 73.3 ± 9.2% Hes-7-G; 26.7 ± 9.2% hesperetin[53]
β-glucosidasePyrococcus furiosusOrange peel extract 95 °C for 12 h (pH 5.5) 100% citrus extract, 0.85 U cm−3 enzyme100% (w/v) conversion of hesperidin to 9.0 g·dm−3 hesperetin after 9 h, with a productivity of 1.00 g·dm−3·h−1[73]
α-l-rhamnosidaseA. nigerReaction mixture (1 cm3 0.5 mM hesperidin, 0.98 cm3 phosphate citrate, and 20 mm−3 α-l-rhamnosidase)0.7 M sorbitol 60 °C, pH 4.5, 10 min63.26% hesperidin was hydrolyzed to Hes-7-G. completely hydrolyzed after 10 h reaction[55]
Naringinase and β-cyclodextrin β-cyclodextrin content 57.5%, hesperidinase, naringinase70 °C, pH 4.598%[74]
* Hes-7-G—hesperetin 7-O-glucoside.
Table 3. The use of naringinase for the hydrolysis of rutin.
Table 3. The use of naringinase for the hydrolysis of rutin.
Form of EnzymeSource of EnzymeReaction MixtureCondition of ReactionResultsReferences
Free naringinase (inactivation of β-d-glucosidase activity)P. decumbens5 mM rutin, 50 mg·dm−3 enzymeResidual activity of α-l-rhamnosidase (78%), pH 3.4, 60.0 °C, 6 h Production yield of isoquercitrin, 61%[2]
Free naringinase (inactivation of β-d-glucosidase activity)P. decumbens5 mM rutin, 50 mg·dm−3 enzymepH 3.4, 60.0 °C, 6 hProduction yield of quercetin, 86%[2]
Free naringinase (inactivate the unwanted β-d-glucosidase)A. terreus100 g·dm−3 rutin, 20 cm3 enzymepH 8.0, 70 °C, 24 hProduction yield of isoquercitrin, 61%; volumetric productivity (up to 300 g·dm−3)[79]
Hesperidinase (contains both α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidase activities; inactivation of β-d-glucosidase activity)A. niger20 cm3 saturated solution of rutin, 10 mg enzymespH 7.0, 40 °C, 30 hProduction yield of isoquercitrin 50.06% [78]
Free naringinase (high α-l-rhamnosidase activity, very low β-d-glucosidase activity)P. decumbens1.5 mM rutin, 0.1 mg·dcm−3 enzyme pH 6, 37 °C, 12 hProduction yield of isoquercitrin, 92%[77]
Free naringinaseP. decumbens0.8 g·dm−3, 3000 U·dm−3 enzyme40 °C, 20 min, ultrasound irradiationProduction yield of isoquercitrin, 95.20 ± 2.52%[75]
Graphene-immobilized naringinase flowing in microchannelsP. decumbens0.05 g·dm−3 rutin, 8 μL, min−1 flow rate40 °C, 10 min92.24 ± 3.26% isoquercitrin[76]
Photo pattern-immobilized naringinase on a microchipP. decumbens0.03 g·dm−3 rutin, 5 µL, min−1 flow rate 45 °C, 5 min93.28 ± 1.12% conversion of rutin, 87.98 ± 1.1% isoquercitrin yield[80]
Free α-l-rhamnosidase and β-d-glucosidaseA. niger20 mg rutin, 40 mg of freeze-dried whole-cell catalysts pH 5.0, 40 °C, 24 h97.2 ± 0.9% conversion of rutin; 94.2 ± 1.6% isoquercitrin; 5.86% ± 1.6% quercetin[53]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, J.; Garncarek, Z. Use of Naringinase to Modify the Sensory Quality of Foods and Increase the Bioavailability of Flavonoids: A Systematic Review. Molecules 2025, 30, 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112376

AMA Style

Bodakowska-Boczniewicz J, Garncarek Z. Use of Naringinase to Modify the Sensory Quality of Foods and Increase the Bioavailability of Flavonoids: A Systematic Review. Molecules. 2025; 30(11):2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, Joanna, and Zbigniew Garncarek. 2025. "Use of Naringinase to Modify the Sensory Quality of Foods and Increase the Bioavailability of Flavonoids: A Systematic Review" Molecules 30, no. 11: 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112376

APA Style

Bodakowska-Boczniewicz, J., & Garncarek, Z. (2025). Use of Naringinase to Modify the Sensory Quality of Foods and Increase the Bioavailability of Flavonoids: A Systematic Review. Molecules, 30(11), 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112376

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop