Next Article in Journal
A Novel Non-Psychoactive Fatty Acid from a Marine Snail, Conus inscriptus, Signals Cannabinoid Receptor 1 (CB1) to Accumulate Apoptotic C16:0 and C18:0 Ceramides in Teratocarcinoma Cell Line PA1
Next Article in Special Issue
Introduction of Electron Donor Groups into the Azulene Structure: The Appearance of Intense Absorption and Emission in the Visible Region
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Characterization and Bioactivity of a Titanium(IV)-Oxo Complex Stabilized by Mandelate Ligands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functionalized Linear Conjugated Polymer/TiO2 Heterojunctions for Significantly Enhancing Photocatalytic H2 Evolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules29081738
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Doping Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers with 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

by
Shenglin Wang
1,†,
Qianqian Yan
1,†,
Hui Hu
1,*,
Xiaofang Su
1,
Huanjun Xu
2,
Jianyi Wang
1 and
Yanan Gao
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Advanced Materials in Tropical Island Resources, Hainan University, No 58, Renmin Avenue, Haikou 570228, China
2
School of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou 571127, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(8), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081738
Submission received: 22 March 2024 / Revised: 9 April 2024 / Accepted: 11 April 2024 / Published: 11 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue π-Conjugated Functional Molecules & Polymers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The design and synthesis of organic photocatalysts remain a great challenge due to their strict structural constraints. However, this could be mitigated by achieving structural flexibility by constructing permanent porosity into the materials. Conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) are an emerging class of porous materials with an amorphous, three-dimensional network structure, which makes it possible to integrate the elaborate functional groups to enhance photocatalytic performance. Here, we report the synthesis of a novel CMP, named TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP, constructed by 1,1′3,3′-tetra(4-aminophenyl)ferrocene (TAPFc) and 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(4-formylphenyl)pyrene (TFPPy) monomers. The integration of the p-type dopant 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) into the TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP improved the light adsorption performance, leading to a decrease in the optical bandgap from 2.00 to 1.43 eV. The doped CMP (TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP) exhibited promising catalytic activity in photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light, yielding 546.8 μmol g−1 h−1 of CO with a selectivity of 96% and 5.2 μmol g−1 h−1 of CH4. This represented an 80% increase in the CO yield compared to the maternal TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. The steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and fluorescence lifetime (FL) measurements reveal faster carrier separation and transport after the doping. This study provides guidance for the development of organic photocatalysts for the utilization of renewable energy.

1. Introduction

Covalent organic polymers (COPs) are porous framework materials composed of organic monomers containing non-metallic, lightweight elements such as C, N, O, B, and Si that have been cross-linked by covalent bonds [1,2]. These materials can be categorized based on their crystallinity and pore structures into various types, including covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) [3,4], conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) [5,6], hyper-cross-linked polymers (HCPs) [7,8], polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs) [9,10], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [11,12], porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) [13,14], porous organic cages [15,16], among others. Specifically, CMPs can be produced using a variety of organic building blocks with straightforward synthetic processes. CMPs feature easily altering energy levels without compromising porosity, a high specific surface area, and excellent thermostability and chemical stability [17,18,19]. In terms of molecular structure and/or function, the rigid structure of building blocks and the integration of conjugated units into CMPs provide structural support for microporous channels, distinguishing them from conjugated small molecules or linear conjugated polymers [20,21]. This feature allows CMPs to retain some photovoltaic properties of conjugated polymers while preserving porosity, which allows for accommodating. Furthermore, CMPs have shown essential applications in gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, semiconductor materials, energy storage, and chemical sensing due to their ability to easily achieve chemical modification and functional regulation.
The narrow bandgap of conjugated polymers (usually 1.5–2.5 eV) allows electrons to be excited from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest occupied molecular orbital (LUMO), which facilitates charge injection, leading to the creation of semiconducting materials [22]. In their undoped state, conjugated polymers lack free charges, resulting in low electrical conductivity. To enhance their conductivity, doping is necessary to introduce charge carriers by transferring electrons or holes to and from the conjugated backbone. Doping with appropriate n-type or p-type additives is a well-established method to adjust the energy levels of molecular orbitals in functional materials, thereby regulating charge carrier injection [23,24,25]. Molecular dopants with low ionization energy (IE) act as electron donors to facilitate n-doping by providing electrons to the LUMO level of the maternal acceptor. Conversely, dopants with high electron affinity (EA) function as electron acceptors and induce p-doping by extracting electrons from the HOMO level of the maternal donor [26]. p-type doping of conjugated polymers has been explored to develop conductive and magnetic organic polymers [27,28,29], since the pioneering research on conductive polyacetylene films [30]. Open-shell polymers can be formed through charge transfer complexation when electron-rich polymers are doped with p-type dopants like tetracyanoethylene, 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), and their derivatives [31,32]. It remains a great challenge to obtain n-type doping in organic semiconductors due to the typically shallow LUMO levels. Electron donors with a powerful capability to donate electrons to organic semiconductors are scarce, and these donors are prone to being unstable in the air, limiting their use in industrial applications.
Ferrocene (dicyclopentadienyliron, Fc) is often referred to as the ‘benzene’ of modern organometallic chemistry due to its significance in the field. First synthesized in 1951, Fc marked a milestone as the first pure hydrocarbon derivative of iron [33,34,35]. Since then, a variety of derivatives of Fc have been designed and synthesized, known for their exceptional stability and unique chemical properties. These derivatives have garnered much interest in different disciplines, such as asymmetric catalysis, nonlinear optics, and electrochemistry, owing to the quasi-reversible oxidation of iron(II) [36,37,38]. Fc derivatives are recognized for their excellent electron-donating properties, diverse structural types, broad light absorption range, and fast charge transfer rate. Consequently, Fc-based functional materials are widely utilized as efficient and stable electron donors in various optoelectronic applications [39]. The construction of CMPs with Fc derivatives as monomers can enrich the complexity of CMPs and show good promise in organic semiconductors, particularly when doped with p-type TCNQ to produce unique charge transfer complexes. While most reported Fc-based CMPs feature a disubstituted Fc group as the connecting unit, CMPs with a highly symmetrical tetrasubstituted Fc group are less common [40,41,42,43].
In this study, we synthesized 1,1′3,3′-tetra(4-aminophenyl)ferrocene (TAPFc) monomer and reacted it with 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(4-formylphenyl)pyrene (TFPPy) to create an electron-rich CMP (named TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP) through the Schiff-base condensation reaction (Scheme 1). By doping with TCNQ, the optical bandgap of the TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP was obviously decreased. The mechanism study showed that faster carrier separation and electrotransport were achieved after the doping of TCNQ. As a result, the doping significantly enhanced the photocatalytic performance of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. The TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP yielded 546.8 μmol g−1 h−1 of CO with a selectivity of 96% and 5.2 μmol g−1 h−1 of CH4, demonstrating an 80% increase in the CO yield compared to the undoped TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP was synthesized through the Schiff base condensation reaction between the tetrasubstituted TAPFc and four-armed TFPPy under solvothermal conditions. The tetrahedral structure of TAPFc and the high-density linkages afforded TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP rich porosity, giving enough room to accommodate guest molecules. To account for the doping of TCNQ into the CMP, a model compound was also synthesized (see Supporting Information). The formation of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra (Figure 1a). Specifically, the peak corresponding to the aldehyde (C=O) bond at 1691 cm−1 and the peaks owing to the amino (N-H) bond at 3310 cm−1 and 3209 cm−1 decreased significantly, while a new peak attributed to the imine bond (C=N) concurrently emerged at 1620 cm−1, resembling that of the model compound. These changes in FT-IR spectra indicated the successful condensation reaction between TAPFc and TFPPy.
Furthermore, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) revealed the rod-shaped morphology of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (Figure 1b). The porosity of the material was assessed by N2 adsorption isotherm analysis at 77 K (Figure 1c). The isothermal curves represent Type I adsorption isotherms as classified by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). When the relative pressure P/P0 > 0.4, the desorption isotherm in the middle does not coincide with the absorption isotherm, resulting in a hysteresis loop. This indicates that the lamellar structure creates pores, or the presence of mesopores in the material, leading to capillary condensation. The material has a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 1085 m2 g−1 and a pore volume of 0.60 cm3 g−1. The predicted pore size distribution curve based on the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model is shown in Figure 1d, TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP, with an average pore diameter of 2.1 nm.

2.2. Doping with TCNQ

The doping with TCNQ was first carried out in the model compound with 1:2 and 1:4 molecular ratios, respectively. As expected, the FT-IR spectra displayed a distinct -CN peak around 2176 cm−1 (Figure S2), while the UV/VIS diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–Vis DRS) exhibited a widened absorption range (Figure S3a). The optical bandgap was thus reduced from 2.05 to 1.57 and further to approximate 1.5 eV when increasing the molecular ratio from 1:2 to 1:4 (Figure S3b), indicating that the Fc structural units could interact with TCNQ to form a stable charge transfer complex. Following the successful doping of the model compound with TCNQ, we proceeded to investigate the doping of the CMP with TCNQ. The doping conditions were first screened, including solvent, temperature, and the molecular ratio of TCNQ. Similarly, the -CN peak of TCNQ-doped TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (named TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP) at 2174–2177 cm−1 in FT-IR spectra was all observed in THF, MeCN, DCM, DMF, and DOX (Figure S4). It is evident that different UV–Vis DRS spectra were found in these solvents (Figure S5a). Among these solvents, TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP in MeCN exhibited a broader absorbance and the corresponding lowest optical band gap of 1.42 eV. Thus, MeCN was chosen as the optimal solvent for the following exploration. The effect of temperature, durations, and molecular ratio on the UV–Vis DRS and optical bandgap was systematically investigated (Figures S6–S11). Considering the boiling point of MeCN and the chemical stability of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP, the optimal doping condition was determined as follows: temperature of 60 °C, duration of 2 days, and TCNQ dosage of 1:4.
Doping leads to a color deepening of the CMP from red to dark brown under optimal conditions (insert in Figure 2a). The FT-IR and UV–Vis DRS results are consistent with the model compound. The absorption spectrum of TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP extends below 900 nm, encompassing the UV–visible and NIR regions, whereas TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP absorbs strongly below 700 nm (Figure 2a). Doping results in a broader absorption spectrum, indicating a significant π–π interaction between TCNQ and the material, along with the appearance of a charge transfer band between 600 and 700 nm, which accounts for the color deepening post-doping. The presence of a broad, low-intensity absorption in the near-infrared region around 1250 nm is a characteristic feature of conjugated and doped materials, signifying the distribution of free-radical charge carriers and the formation of mixed valence bands between doped and undoped regions [44]. The Tauc curve analysis reveals a considerable reduction in the bandgap of the doped material from 2.00 to 1.43 eV, facilitating electron transitions and leading to a higher intrinsic carrier concentration (Figure 2b). The shift in the absorption band edge is crucial for enhancing the material’s absorption across the spectrum. Doped materials can effectively utilize the entire visible spectral range compared to undoped materials. Additionally, a narrower band gap necessitates less excitation energy, which is advantageous for photogenerated carrier excitation, transitions, and separation. The presence of -CN peaks at approximately 2174 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum (Figure 2c) confirms the success of the doping process. Additionally, the peak corresponding to -CN at 2221 cm−1 of TCNQ shows a noticeable redshift. This shift is mainly due to the decrease in electron cloud density resulting from the π–π interaction between TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and TCNQ, causing an expansion of the conjugated system. There was no significant displacement or weakening observed in the imine bond peaks, providing further evidence of the stability of the CMP structure. This was also evident in the XPS spectra (Figure 2d), where a new -CN peak at 398.5 eV appeared after TCNQ doping, while the imine bond peaks remained consistent before and after the doping. The BET-specific surface area of the doped material decreased from 1085 to 787 m2 g−1 (Figure S12a). The decrease in specific surface area suggests that the material has undergone doping with TCNQ. The N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K shows a consistent type I adsorption isotherm, indicating that the pore structure of the material has not been altered. Although a high dosage of TCNQ (1:4) was used, only a slight decrease in pore size (from 2.1 to 1.9 nm) was observed (Figure S12b), indicating the efficient doping of TCNQ into the CMP interlayer without obviously sacrificing the pores. Additionally, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP has a composition temperature of about 419 °C, which is much higher than that of TCNQ (260 °C), suggesting that TCNQ was strongly chemically adsorbed within the CMP instead of simply physically mixing (Figure S13). The minor decrease in thermal stability following TCNQ doping is caused by the thermal disintegration of TCNQ units existing in the material.

2.3. Photocatalytic Performance

The impact of doping on material properties was initially investigated through a photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Mott–Schottky measurements revealed that the TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP exhibited flat-band potentials of −0.75 and −0.86 V vs. Ag/AgCl, respectively (see Figure S14). Furthermore, the positive slope of the Mott–Schottky plots indicated that both materials are n-type semiconductors. It is known that for n-type semiconductors, the LUMO energy level is equal to the flat band potential [45], resulting in LUMO energy levels of −0.55 and −0.66 eV (vs. NHE) for TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP, respectively. According to the band gap, the corresponding HOMO energy levels were calculated to be 1.45 and 0.77 eV (vs. NHE). Energy band diagrams were depicted for both materials, revealing that their LUMO energy level potentials are lower than those of the CO2/CO redox potential (Figure S15). This suggests that the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO is thermodynamically favorable.
The photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction was carried out under visible light (300 W Xe lamp, λ ≥ 400 nm). Typically, 10 mg of catalyst was sonicated for 20 min and suspended in a solvent mixture of acetonitrile, H2O, and triethanolamine (3:1:1). The reaction system was then purified with pure CO2 to produce CO and CH4 as the primary products. The yields of CO and CH4 were 303.4 μmol g−1 h−1 and 5.2 μmol g−1 h−1, respectively, with a 94% selectivity for CO after 4 h of reaction catalyzed by TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. On the other hand, the TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP catalyst led to a CO yield of 546.8 μmol g−1 h−1 with 96% CO selectivity and CH4 yield of 6.1 μmol g−1 h−1 (Figure 3a). Obviously, an 80% increase in the CO yield was observed after the doping of the CMP with TCNQ, suggesting that doping significantly enhanced the catalytic performance of the Fc-based CMPs. Moreover, both materials exhibited excellent cycling stability, as no obvious changes in the FT-IR spectrum were observed. Their catalytic activities remained almost unchanged after five cycles (Figure 3b).
To investigate the impact of dopants on the photocatalytic performance of materials, we examined carrier separation and transfer efficiency through the measurements of steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and fluorescence lifetime (FL). The PL spectra indicate a significant decrease in the fluorescence intensity of the CMP after doping TCNQ (Figure 4a), suggesting suppression of photogenerated electron–hole pair complexation and enhanced carrier separation efficiency. Analysis of FL spectra and fitted data revealed a fluorescence decay time of 3.36 ns for TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and 1.77 ns for TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP, indicating faster carrier separation and transport after the doping (Figure 4b). The reduction in FL suggests increased separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [46]. Photocurrent response tests show a notable increase in the photocurrent of TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (Figure 4c), confirming improved separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs in visible light due to the TCNQ-CMP interaction. The photocurrent density significantly increased from 0.19 μA cm−2 to approximately 0.65 μA cm−2 after TCNQ complexation, representing a 3.4-fold enlargement compared to the pure TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. This increase serves as a strong indication of TCNQ’s role in enhancing photogenerated electron transport within the composite photocatalysts and reducing the likelihood of photogenerated carrier complexation. Consequently, the photocatalytic performance of the photocatalysts is greatly improved. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results also demonstrate a significant decrease in the Nyquist curve radius, revealing a decreased charge transfer resistance of TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. This means that interfacial charge transfer was enhanced after doping TCNQ (Figure 4d). TCNQ, being a potent electron acceptor, plays a crucial role in enhancing the separation and transportation of photogenerated carriers in composite photocatalysts through conjugated complexation with TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP. This interaction effectively lowers the internal resistance of the photocatalysts and minimizes the likelihood of photogenerated carrier recombination. The catalytic activity of the photocatalysts is notably improved by the significant enhancement in photocatalytic activity and apparent reaction rate following TCNQ doping.
Overall, these results reveal that TCNQ doping enhances charge transfer, leading to improved separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs and overall material properties. Based on these results, the possible catalytic process for photocatalytic CO2 reduction using TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP was presented. Under the light irradiation, we believe that the photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was excited, and then TEOA donated one electron to the excited [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to produce [Ru(bpy)3]+. After that, [Ru(bpy)3]+ transferred an electron to the CMP, which in turn initiated the conversion process from CO2 to CO on the CMP surface [47,48,49,50,51].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Chemicals

7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), acetic acid (AcOH), n-butanol (BuOH), 1,2-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB), acetonitrile (MeCN), and 1,4-dioxane (DOX) were purchased from TCI chemicals. Benzaldehyde, tetrahydrofuran (THF), ethyl acetate, dichloromethane (DCM), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), triethanolamine, [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2-6H2O, and Na2SO4 were purchased from Adamas. A total of 5% Nafion solution was purchased from Alfa Aesar. 1,1′3,3′-Tetra(4-aminophenyl)ferrocene (TAPFc) and 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(4-formylphenyl)pyrene (TFPPy) were synthesized according to the reported procedures in the literature [45,46].

3.2. Synthesis of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP

To a 25 mL reaction tube, TAPFc (55.0 mg, 0.1 mmol), TFPPy (61.8 mg, 0.1 mmol), o-DCB (5 mL), and 6 M AcOH (0.5 mL) were added. The mixture was heated and stirred at 120 °C for 24 h under nitrogen and then cooled to room temperature. The solid powder was filtered, washed with THF, and dried under vacuum at 120 °C for 2 h to give TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP as a red powder in 90% isolated yield.

3.3. CMP Doping with TCNQ

The doping procedures of the CMP with TCNQ were evaluated with varied solvents, TCNQ dosage, temperature, and duration time, all with a CMP dosage of 10 mg.

3.4. Photoelectrochemical Measurement

Firstly, the indium tin oxide (ITO) conductive glass required for the measurements was ultrasonically cleaned with ethanol and water for 30 min and dried. Then, 5 mg of fully ground sample (TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP or TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP) was dispersed in BuOH (2 mL) with 10 μL of 5% Nafion adhesive and sonicated for 30 min to form a homogenous slurry. A 20 uL drop of the resulting slurry was placed on the ITO and dried naturally to form a uniform film (area of 0.25 cm2) that served as a working electrode. The counter and reference electrodes were platinum plates (1 cm × 1 cm) and Ag/AgCl electrodes, respectively, while the electrolyte was Na2SO4 aqueous solution (0.25 M). The photocurrent response was measured by lighting the back of the working electrode with a 300 W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 400 nm). All photoelectrochemical measurements were recorded on an LVIUM electrochemical workstation.

3.5. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

Photocatalytic CO2 reductions were carried out using a Labsolar-6A online trace gas analysis system. In a quartz reactor, 10 mg of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP or TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and 20 mg of [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2-6H2O were dispersed in a 50 mL mixture of acetonitrile, H2O, and triethanolamine (3:1:1) and continuously stirred. After three vacuum degassing and CO2 filling cycles, the reaction system was then filled with CO2 until the pressure reached 80 kPa. The mixture was then exposed to irradiation from a 300 W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 400 nm) while maintaining a reactor temperature of 25 °C. Gas analysis was conducted every 1 h of light exposure using online monitoring via a gas chromatograph (GC9790 II). The recycling performance of the materials was assessed by filtering and washing the materials with water and THF, followed by photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions under the same conditions.

4. Conclusions

This study successfully synthesized a conjugated microporous polymer (CMP) with a symmetric tetrasubstituted ferrocene (Fc) functional group as one organic monomer. The exceptional electron-donating properties of the Fc group facilitate charge transfer between the CMP and the p-type dopant TCNQ, leading to the formation of stable charge transfer complexes. Various characterizations confirmed a significant interaction between TCNQ and CMP, resulting in a reduction in the optical bandgap from 2.0 to 1.43 eV. This enhancement in the separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs notably improved the photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance, leading to an 80% increase in CO yield. The precise tuning of organic polymers demonstrates the potential for utilizing organic semiconductors in photocatalysis and supports further advancements in the field of organic semiconductors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29081738/s1, Scheme S1. Synthetic route of the model compound; Figure S1. MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum of the model compound; Figure S2. FT-IR spectra of the model compound and its complexes with TCNQ in different molar ratios; Figure S3. (a) UV–Vis DRS and (b) Tauc plots of the model compound and its complexes with TCNQ in different molar ratios; Figure S4. FT-IR spectra of CMPs doped with TCNQ (1:4, mass ratio) in different solvents; Figure S5. (a) UV–Vis DRS and (b) Tauc plots of CMPs doped with TCNQ in different solvents; Figure S6. FT-IR spectra of TCNQ doped on the CMP at different temperatures; Figure S7. (a) UV–Vis DRS and (b) Tauc plots of TCNQ doped on the CMP at different temperatures; Figure S8. FT-IR spectra of TCNQ doped on the CMP for different duration times; Figure S9. (a) UV–Vis DRS and (b) Tauc plots of TCNQ doped on the CMP for different duration times; Figure S10. FT-IR spectra of TCNQ doped on the CMP at different TCNQ dosages; Figure S11. (a) UV–Vis DRS and (b) Tauc plots of TCNQ doped on the CMP at different TCNQ dosages; Figure S12. (a) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K and (d) pore size distribution curve of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue); Figure S13. TGA curves of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red), TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue), and TCNQ (black); Figure S14. Mott–Schottky curves of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (a) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (b); Figure S15. Energy band structure of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; methodology, S.W. and Q.Y.; software, S.W. and Q.Y.; validation, Y.G., H.H., S.W. and Q.Y.; resources, Y.G. and H.H.; data curation, S.W., H.X. and X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.G. and J.W.; supervision, Y.G.; project administration, Y.G.; funding acquisition, Y.G. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22105053 and 22165009), the Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province, China (ZDYF2024GXJS005), the Major Science and Technology Plan of Hainan Province, China (ZDKJ202016), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province, China (521QN209).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that most of the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Material. Raw data are available from the corresponding author (Y.G.) on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xiang, Z.; Cao, D.; Dai, L. Well-defined two dimensional covalent organic polymers: Rational design, controlled syntheses, and potential applications. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1896–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, C.; Zhong, S.; He, X.; Qin, C.; Cao, D. Covalent-organic polymers for carbon dioxide capture. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22663–22669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kuhn, P.; Antonietti, M.; Thomas, A. Porous, covalent triazine-based frameworks prepared by ionothermal synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3450–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Katekomol, P.; Roeser, J.; Bojdys, M.; Weber, J.; Thomas, A. Covalent Triazine Frameworks Prepared from 1,3,5-Tricyanobenzene. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, J.X.; Su, F.; Trewin, A.; Wood, C.D.; Campbell, N.L.; Niu, H.; Dickinson, C.; Ganin, A.Y.; Rosseinsky, M.J.; Khimyak, Y.Z.; et al. Conjugated microporous poly(aryleneethynylene) networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8574–8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, Y.; Jin, S.; Xu, H.; Nagai, A.; Jiang, D. Conjugated microporous polymers: Design, synthesis and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8012–8031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tan, L.; Tan, B. Hypercrosslinked porous polymer materials: Design, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3322–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luo, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, W.; Wu, K.; Tan, B. Hypercrosslinked Aromatic Heterocyclic Microporous Polymers: A New Class of Highly Selective CO2 Capturing Materials. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5703–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. McKeown, N.B.; Budd, P.M. Exploitation of Intrinsic Microporosity in Polymer-Based Materials. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 5163–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Budd, P.M.; Ghanem, B.S.; Makhseed, S.; McKeown, N.B.; Msayib, K.J.; Tattershall, C.E. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): Robust, solution-processable, organic nanoporous materials. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2, 230–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lyu, H.; Diercks, C.S.; Zhu, C.; Yaghi, O.M. Porous Crystalline Olefin-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6848–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, N.; Wang, P.; Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: A materials platform for structural and functional designs. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Konstas, K.; Taylor, J.W.; Thornton, A.W.; Doherty, C.M.; Lim, W.X.; Bastow, T.J.; Kennedy, D.F.; Wood, C.D.; Cox, B.J.; Hill, J.M.; et al. Lithiated Porous Aromatic Frameworks with Exceptional Gas Storage Capacity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6639–6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ben, T.; Ren, H.; Ma, S.; Cao, D.; Lan, J.; Jing, X.; Wang, W.; Xu, J.; Deng, F.; Simmons, J.M.; et al. Targeted Synthesis of a Porous Aromatic Framework with High Stability and Exceptionally High Surface Area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9457–9460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I. Porous organic cages: Soluble, modular and molecular pores. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holst, J.R.; Trewin, A.; Cooper, A.I. Porous organic molecules. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ding, X.; Han, B.H. Metallophthalocyanine-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers as Highly Efficient Photosensitizers for Singlet Oxygen Generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6536–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, J.X.; Trewin, A.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Band gap engineering in fluorescent conjugated microporous polymers. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1777–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sprick, R.S.; Jiang, J.X.; Bonillo, B.; Ren, S.; Ratvijitvech, T.; Guiglion, P.; Zwijnenburg, M.A.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Tunable Organic Photocatalysts for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3265–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vilela, F.; Zhang, K.; Antonietti, M. Conjugated porous polymers for energy applications. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7819–7832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cooper, A.I. Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1291–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Qian, K.; He, Y.B.; Liu, C.; An, D.; Li, Y.; Zhou, D.; Lin, Z.; Li, B.; Yang, Q.H.; et al. A dual-functional gel-polymer electrolyte for lithium ion batteries with superior rate and safety performances. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 18888–18895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, Y.; Rengert, Z.D.; McDowell, C.; Ford, M.J.; Wang, M.; Karki, A.; Lill, A.T.; Bazan, G.C.; Thuc-Quyen, N. Doping Polymer Semiconductors by Organic Salts: Toward High-Performance Solution-Processed Organic Field-Effect Transistors. Acs Nano 2018, 12, 3938–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, X.; Wegner, B.; Lee, K.M.; Fusella, M.A.; Zhang, F.; Moudgil, K.; Rand, B.P.; Barlow, S.; Marder, S.R.; Koch, N.; et al. Beating the thermodynamic limit with photo-activation of n-doping in organic semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 1209–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tietze, M.L.; Benduhn, J.; Pahner, P.; Nell, B.; Schwarze, M.; Kleemann, H.; Krammer, M.; Zojer, K.; Vandewal, K.; Leo, K. Elementary steps in electrical doping of organic semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jacobs, I.E.; Moule, A.J. Controlling Molecular Doping in Organic Semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Michinobu, T.; Inui, J.; Nishide, H. m-Phenylene-linked aromatic poly(aminium cationic radical)s: Persistent high-spin organic polyradicals. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2165–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Michinobu, T.; Inui, J.; Nishide, H. Two-dimensionally extended organic high-spin poly(aminium cationic radical)s and their magnetic force microscopic images. Polym. J. 2010, 42, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Michinobu, T.; Kato, F.; Inui, J.; Nishide, H. Two-Dimensionally Extended Aromatic Polyamines for Optimization of Charge-Transporting Properties by Partial Oxidation. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 4577–4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shirakawa, H.; Louis, E.J.; MacDiarmid, A.G.; Chiang, C.K.; Heeger, A.J. Synthesis of electrically conducting organic polymers: Halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH)x. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1977, 16, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oyaizu, K.; Mitsuhashi, F.; Tsuchida, E. Palladium-catalyzed synthesis of oligo(methylthio)aniline and conversion to polyacene-type electrolytes bearing phenothiazinium repeating units. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 1328–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weng, X.L.; Wang, Y.; Jia, C.Y.; Wan, Z.Q.; Chen, X.M.; Yao, X.J. Theoretical Investigation of Novel Tetrathiafulvalene-Triphenylamine Sensitizers. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 1990–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Werner, H. At Least 60 Years of Ferrocene: The Discovery and Rediscovery of the Sandwich Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6052–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Inkpen, M.S.; Scheerer, S.; Linseis, M.; White, A.J.P.; Winter, R.F.; Albrecht, T.; Long, N.J. Oligomeric ferrocene rings. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pietschnig, R. Polymers with pendant ferrocenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5216–5231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hailes, R.L.N.; Oliver, A.M.; Gwyther, J.; Whittell, G.R.; Manners, I. Polyferrocenylsilanes: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5358–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.X.; Chen, L.J.; Yang, H.B. Construction of multiferrocenyl metallacycles and metallacages via coordination-driven self-assembly: From structure to functions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2148–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Malischewski, M.; Adelhardt, M.; Sutter, J.; Meyer, K.; Seppelt, K. Isolation and structural and electronic characterization of salts of the decamethylferrocene dication. Science 2016, 353, 678–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, S.K.; Chauhan, R.; Singh, B.; Diwan, K.; Kociok-Koehn, G.; Bahadur, L.; Singh, N. Enhanced light harvesting efficiencies of bis(ferrocenylmethyl)-based sulfur rich sensitizers used in dye sensitized TiO2 solar cells. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, X.; Wang, R.; Peng, Q.; Zhao, H.; Fan, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, Q. Effect of pore structure on the adsorption capacities to different sizes of adsorbates by ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers. Polymer 2021, 233, 124192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Li, P.; Hao, Y.; Shao, P.; Yin, A.; Feng, X.; Wang, B. Ferrocene-Linkage-Facilitated Charge Separation in Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4221–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Samy, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Conjugated Microporous Polymers Based on Ferrocene Units as Highly Efficient Electrodes for Energy Storage. Polymers 2023, 15, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tan, Z.; Su, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Liao, B.; Amin, A.M.; Liu, Q. Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers Derived from Yamamoto Coupling for Gas Storage and Dye Removal. Polymers 2020, 12, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cai, S.L.; Zhang, Y.B.; Pun, A.B.; He, B.; Yang, J.; Toma, F.M.; Sharp, I.D.; Yaghi, O.M.; Fan, J.; Zheng, S.R.; et al. Tunable electrical conductivity in oriented thin films of tetrathiafulvalene-based covalent organic framework. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 4693–4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hosono, N.; Yoshihara, N.; Murakami, Y.; Watanabe, T. Hinge-Linked Polymer Gels: A Rigid Network Cross-Linked with a Rotatable Tetrasubstituted Ferrocene. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 1356–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ascherl, L.; Evans, E.W.; Hennemann, M.; Di Nuzzo, D.; Hufnagel, A.G.; Beetz, M.; Friend, R.H.; Clark, T.; Bein, T.; Auras, F. Solvatochromic covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kumar, A.; Sharma, G.; Thakur, M.; Pathania, D. Sol-gel synthesis of polyacrylamide-stannic arsenate nanocomposite ion exchanger: Binary separations and enhanced photo-catalytic activity. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, A.; Thakur, M.; Kumar, A.; Gautam, M.; Kumari, S.; Pathania, D.; Sharma, A. Efficient photodegradation of fast sulphon black and crystal violet dyes from water systems using locust bean gum (LBG)-encapsulated zirconium-based nanoparticles and antibacterial activity. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 859–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qiu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Long, C.; Su, L.; Liu, S.; Tang, Z. Applications of Nanomaterials in Asymmetric Photocatalysis: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2001731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dai, C.; Liu, B. Conjugated polymers for visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 24–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, H.; Dai, K.; Zhang, J.; Dawson, G. Inorganic-organic hybrid photocatalysts: Syntheses, mechanisms, and applications. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 2111–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01738 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Molecules 29 01738 sch001
Molecules 29 01738 g001
Figure 1. (a) FT-IR spectrum of TFPPy (blue), TAPFc (orange), model compound (green), and TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red). (b) FE-SEM image; (c) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K; and (d) pore size distribution curve of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Figure 1. (a) FT-IR spectrum of TFPPy (blue), TAPFc (orange), model compound (green), and TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red). (b) FE-SEM image; (c) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K; and (d) pore size distribution curve of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Molecules 29 01738 g001
Molecules 29 01738 g002
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis DRS spectra, optical images (inside), (b) Tauc curve, and (c) FT-IR spectra of TCNQ (black), TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red), and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue). (d) XPS spectra of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (upper) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (lower).
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis DRS spectra, optical images (inside), (b) Tauc curve, and (c) FT-IR spectra of TCNQ (black), TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red), and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue). (d) XPS spectra of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (upper) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (lower).
Molecules 29 01738 g002
Molecules 29 01738 g003
Figure 3. (a) Photocatalytic CO and CH4 evolution and (b) recycling performance of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue) for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction.
Figure 3. (a) Photocatalytic CO and CH4 evolution and (b) recycling performance of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (red) and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP (blue) for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction.
Molecules 29 01738 g003
Molecules 29 01738 g004
Figure 4. (a) PL spectra, (b) FL spectra, (c) photocurrent response, and (d) EIS spectra of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Figure 4. (a) PL spectra, (b) FL spectra, (c) photocurrent response, and (d) EIS spectra of TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP and TCNQ@TAPFc-TFPPy-CMP.
Molecules 29 01738 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Yan, Q.; Hu, H.; Su, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y. Doping Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers with 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Molecules 2024, 29, 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081738

AMA Style

Wang S, Yan Q, Hu H, Su X, Xu H, Wang J, Gao Y. Doping Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers with 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Molecules. 2024; 29(8):1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shenglin, Qianqian Yan, Hui Hu, Xiaofang Su, Huanjun Xu, Jianyi Wang, and Yanan Gao. 2024. "Doping Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers with 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction" Molecules 29, no. 8: 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081738

APA Style

Wang, S., Yan, Q., Hu, H., Su, X., Xu, H., Wang, J., & Gao, Y. (2024). Doping Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers with 7,7,8,8-Tetracyanoquinodimethane for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Molecules, 29(8), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081738

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop