Next Article in Journal
Agave angustifolia Haw. Leaves as a Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds: Extraction Optimization and Extract Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Anti-Inflammatory Constituents from Aesculus wilsonii Seeds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress in Nanoparticle Inhibitors for Crude Oil Asphaltene Deposition

by
Shuangchun Yang
1,
Chenhui Yan
1,
Jiatie Cai
1,*,
Yi Pan
1 and
Qiuju Han
2
1
Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering College, Liaoning Petrochemical University, No.1, West Section of Dandong Road, Wanghua District, Fushun 113001, China
2
Department of Petrochemical Engineering College, Liaoning Petrochemical University, No.1, West Section of Dandong Road, Wanghua District, Fushun 113001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(5), 1135; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051135
Submission received: 8 January 2024 / Revised: 27 February 2024 / Accepted: 1 March 2024 / Published: 3 March 2024

Abstract

:
Currently, the alteration of external factors during crude oil extraction easily disrupts the thermodynamic equilibrium of asphaltene, resulting in the continuous flocculation and deposition of asphaltene molecules in crude oil. This accumulation within the pores of reservoir rocks obstructs the pore throat, hindering the efficient extraction of oil and gas, and consequently, affecting the recovery of oil and gas resources. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the principles of asphaltene deposition inhibition and the synthesis of asphaltene inhibitors. In recent years, the development of nanotechnology has garnered significant attention due to its unique surface and volume effects. Nanoparticles possess a large specific surface area, high adsorption capacity, and excellent suspension and catalytic abilities, exhibiting unparalleled advantages compared with traditional organic asphaltene inhibitors, such as sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate and salicylic acid. At present, there are three primary types of nanoparticle inhibitors: metal oxide nanoparticles, organic nanoparticles, and inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles. This paper reviews the recent advancements and application challenges of nanoparticle asphaltene deposition inhibition technology based on the mechanism of asphaltene deposition and nano-inhibitors. The aim was to provide insights for ongoing research in this field and to identify potential future research directions.

1. Introduction

In the process of crude oil extraction, the thermodynamic equilibrium of asphaltene can be easily disrupted due to alterations in the external conditions, such as the temperature and pressure, or changes in the composition of the oil sample [1,2]. Asphaltene, which is the most structurally complex, dense, and polar component with high surface activity in crude oil, is prone to deposition during mining operations [3]. The deposition of asphaltenes in crude oil can negatively impact the recovery factor of crude oil extraction or production and may cause scaling and equipment blockage [4,5,6,7]. The precipitation of asphaltenes within the reservoir, for instance, alters the wettability of the rock. This process can also lead to formation damage and pore throat obstruction, thereby decreasing the oil content [8]. Simultaneously, during petroleum exploration and extraction, asphaltene continues to accumulate, resulting in the obstruction of well pipes, separators, and other peripheral equipment by asphaltene. This severely compromises the efficiency of oil production [9,10]. The deposition of asphaltenes in the ground oil pipeline limits the flow in the pipeline and even clogs the pipeline, which also reduces the efficiency of oil transportation [11,12]. Asphaltene is also adsorbed on the refining unit, which leads to coking, equipment corrosion, and catalyst pollution [13]. These examples show that asphaltene deposition in crude oil is a common phenomenon in the petroleum industry. For example, the United States, Canada, Norway, and other places have experienced severe asphaltene deposition [14,15]. So far, some research results were achieved in applying asphaltene inhibitors at home and abroad. However, due to the strong directivity of inhibitors, there are significant differences in the composition and properties of crude oil and asphaltene from different sources, and the applicable sedimentary inhibitors are also different.
In recent years, nanotechnology has been widely used in oil and gas exploration, reservoir characterization, drilling and completion, and enhanced oil recovery [16,17]. As the core of nanotechnology, nanomaterials refer to ultrafine materials with at least one dimension in the nanoscale range in three-dimensional space. Compared with conventional chemical agents, nanomaterials have significant performance differences in terms of the surface effect, rheology, mass transfer effect, transient phenomenon, and particle migration [18,19]. Due to the unique physical and chemical properties, such as the surface effect, volume effect, and quantum effect, nanomaterials have shown great potential in improving oil recovery. The primary mechanism of nanomaterials to improve oil recovery is the change in wettability, the decrease in oil–water interfacial tension, and the change in oil–water mobility [20,21]. Nanoparticles have good suspension and catalytic properties due to their large specific surface area and adsorption capacity, and have also been used by researchers to inhibit asphaltene deposition. Currently, asphaltene inhibitors can be categorized as follows: naturally occurring fatty acid organics, surface-active substances containing benzene rings, vegetable oil or petroleum-derived products, ionic liquids, and nanoparticle inhibitors [22]. Fatty acid organic inhibitors have a good inhibitory effect and are harmless to the environment, but the concentration is high [23]. Surface active agent inhibitors containing a benzene ring can alter interfacial properties and maintain asphaltene in a stable dispersed state, whereas certain nonionic surfactants are incapable of dissolving asphaltene [24].The vegetable oils and oil-processing products exhibit high thermal stability, low permeability, and inherent self-drying properties; however, their application scope remains limited, with scarce research studies conducted in this area [25]. The inhibitors based on ionic liquids exhibit remarkably low vapor pressure, a low melting point, excellent thermal stability, non-flammability, and favorable solubility in various solvents. However, the production scale and intricate synthesis mechanism of these ionic liquids render them more costly compared with commercially available asphaltene inhibitors [26,27,28]. Moreover, compared with traditional organic asphaltene inhibitors (such as sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate and phenol), it has significant advantages. It is considered one of the most promising solutions for asphaltene deposition [29].
In recent years, the utilization of nanotechnology for mitigating asphaltene deposition has garnered attention from researchers. Guerrero-Martin et al. [30] comprehensively examined the utilization of nanotechnology in addressing asphaltene deposition, focusing on the sol–gel method, co-precipitation method, synthesis of functionalized nanoparticles, and interactions between asphaltene and nanoparticles. They emphasized that future research should prioritize intelligent and responsive nanoparticles, self-assembling nanoparticles, nanoparticles with self-healing capacity, and nanomaterials with detection and monitoring capabilities. Fuentes et al. [31] reviewed the conventional methods, such as acidizing and clay inhibitors used to slow down the migration of fine powder and the application of different nanoparticles in enhanced oil recovery, low-salinity water injection, and hydraulic fracturing. However, there is a scarcity of comprehensive descriptions from diverse perspectives on the efficacy of various nanoparticle-based asphaltene deposition inhibitors. In this paper, the mechanism of action of asphaltene nano-inhibitors is reviewed, and the latest research progress of different kinds of nanoparticles is introduced. First, the mechanism of asphaltene deposition in crude oil is introduced, and the influencing factors of crude oil stability are explored from the aspects of crude oil composition, pressure, and temperature. Second, the mechanism of inhibiting asphaltene deposition by nanomaterials is discussed for metal oxide nanoparticles, organic nanoparticles, and inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles. In addition, the interaction between nano-inhibitors and asphaltenes is described based on molecular simulation techniques. Finally, a comprehensive analysis is provided regarding the challenges and opportunities faced by nanomaterials in effectively mitigating asphaltene deposition.

2. Analysis of Nanoparticles Inhibiting Asphaltene Deposition

Asphaltene is a black, glossy, and brittle solid with a molecular weight of 750~1200 Da. It comprises polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon cores with fused rings and short alkyl chains. The common condensation methods of aromatic hydrocarbons are the biphenyl type, slim condensation, and forced condensation (as shown in Figure 1). The main components of asphaltenes are C and H. Most nonmetallic heteroatoms, such as N, O, and S, in crude oil and metal elements, such as Ni, V, Fe, and Ca, also exist in asphaltenes. The differences in molecular weight and structure of asphaltenes are primarily affected by the region in which they are located. Crude oil from different regions will lead to significant differences in the properties of asphaltenes. At the same time, the molecular weight of asphaltenes is also affected by extraction methods to a certain extent. For example, the average molecular weight of asphaltenes extracted with n-pentane is smaller than that of n-heptane.
Although the molecular structure of asphaltene is exceedingly intricate and its precise characterization is challenging, numerous researchers conducted in-depth investigations on the analysis of asphaltene’s structure, resulting in the development of numerous distinct asphaltene structure models. Among them, the isolated island model and the archipelago model are the two most classic ones, as shown in Figure 2. The former was first proposed by Yen [32], and its structure contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, while the latter is composed of multiple polycyclic aromatic nuclei connected by alkyl bridges [33]. Subsequent researchers modified and supplemented their models based on these two models, and obtained several asphaltene structure models with different characteristics and properties, such as Mullins’ [34] Yen–Mullins model and Derek’s [35] improved Yen–Mullins model of benzodibenzothiophene based on the hydrocarbon asphaltene model.

2.1. Asphaltene Deposition Mechanism

In underground reservoirs, due to the particularity of external conditions and the presence of other light components and resins in crude oil, asphaltenes can be stably dispersed in crude oil. When crude oil is extracted from underground, due to the changes in temperature, pressure, and its components, the self-aggregation trend of asphaltenes will lead to the precipitation of asphaltenes from crude oil and the formation of deposits, which will lead to the blockage of pore throats in rock strata, the destruction of the pore structure, the reversal of reservoir wettability and a decrease in reservoir permeability, and changes in the physical and chemical properties of the crude oil. During the transportation process, asphaltene will cause a blockage of the pipeline, and the deposition of the downstream part will also cause a blockage of the pipeline. The acidic functional groups will also corrode the pipeline and production equipment, which is not conducive to actual production. Due to the frequent occurrence of asphaltene deposition in the production process of oil wells in a thriving area of Tahe Oilfield in China, the pipeline is blocked and punctured. The frequency of maintenance and cleaning is increased, which has a significant impact on the regular operation and productivity of oil wells, resulting in substantial economic losses [36].
Asphaltene deposition can be divided into three steps: instability, aggregation, and precipitation [37]. Asphaltene instability refers to the destruction of its equilibrium state to produce nanoscale asphaltenes; after that is the aggregation of asphaltenes, which means that the particles of asphaltenes can be observed at the microscale; the last stage is the precipitation process of the transition from stable nanoparticles to unstable micron particles.

2.1.1. The Existing State and Influencing Factors of Asphaltenes

At present, the existing states of asphaltene in crude oil systems are mainly described by solution theory and colloid theory. Colloid theory is widely accepted.
Solution theory [38] refers to using asphaltene as a solute, a liquid crude oil group as a solvent, and a crude oil system as a homogeneous binary mixture. The solubility of asphaltene in crude oil is an essential factor that affects its dissolution. When asphaltene reaches saturation in crude oil, it will precipitate. The model based on this theory has a high accuracy in judging the precipitation point and precipitation amount of asphaltene. However, it ignores the complexity of a crude oil system and is not suitable for the prediction of a complex system.
Colloid theory [39] claims that crude oil is a colloidal system. The asphaltene in the crude oil colloidal system is used as a dispersed phase. The oil in the crude oil (saturates and aromatics) acts as a dispersed medium. The polarity and molecular weight of the crude oil are only lower than that of the asphaltene. The resin acts as a peptizer, and a relatively stable colloidal system is formed by the action of the resin and the dispersed medium. The crude oil colloid system is centered on asphaltene. The colloid molecules with larger molecular weight and aromaticity cover the surface of the asphaltene. The small molecules with relatively low aromaticity are attached around the colloid, and finally, transit to the intermicellar phase. However, there is no phase interface in the middle. Only when the characteristics and contents of each component of crude oil match each other can the asphaltene colloid system reach a stable state. In recent years, with the application of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), and ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering [40], it was confirmed that asphaltene exists in the form of micelles in crude oil.
For the colloid-based solution theory, scientists believe that asphaltenes dissolved in crude oil exist in a more stable dispersed colloid form, and crude oil is not a true solution. As shown in Figure 3, with asphaltene as the core, the resin is attached to its outside, which plays a good role in its stability. Some micelles composed of asphaltene and resin are only tens of nanometers, but some are relatively large and can even reach hundreds of nanometers.
Many studies showed that most crude oil exists in a relatively stable colloidal dispersion system under formation conditions, and asphaltenes are affected by many factors during deposition. Alian et al. [41] found that the stability of asphaltenes depends on the composition, pressure, and temperature of crude oil. Among them, the influence of constituent factors is greater.
The effect of temperature on asphaltene deposition has different effects on different crude oils; therefore, it is necessary to judge according to the composition and properties of the crude oil system. Mohammadi et al. [42] designed a series of high-pressure–high-temperature decompression experiments to evaluate the effect of temperature on the precipitation and aggregation of asphaltenes in light oil, and they believed that the effect of temperature on the precipitation of asphaltenes was considerable. As the temperature of the decompression process increases, the amount of asphaltene precipitation decreases. As shown in Figure 4, the oil–asphaltene solubility parameter difference (δaspoil) decreases with increasing temperature (asphaltene solubility increases), resulting in a decrease in asphaltene precipitation. On the other hand, it is believed that the decrease in oil viscosity with temperature is the main driving force for the early precipitation of asphaltenes, rather than the dissolution of asphaltenes. In the light oil samples studied, the aggregation of asphaltenes at higher temperatures is controlled by the reaction-limited mechanism. The transition from reaction limited aggregation to diffusion limited aggregation in the mechanism of asphaltene aggregation occurred gradually as the temperature decreased.
Lu et al. [43] found that the effect of temperature on the stability of asphaltenes in the system is complex. When the temperature decreases, the change in cohesive energy density and evaporation internal energy increases the solubility of asphaltene in crude oil. However, as the temperature of crude oil increases, the density of crude oil becomes smaller, resulting in a weakening of the force between asphaltene and resin. Part of the resin desorbs from the surface of asphaltene, and asphaltene deposits due to Brownian motion aggregation and flocculation. The impact of temperature on asphaltene precipitation is multifaceted, involving the compositional and intrinsic properties of the crude oil. The effect of system pressure on asphaltene deposition in crude oil is also complicated. Some studies showed that the solubility of asphaltenes decreases with increasing pressure, and some studies found that the solubility of asphaltenes increases with increasing pressure [44]. Burke [45] found that asphaltene precipitation can only occur in a specific pressure range. If the pressure is lower or higher than this range, asphaltene precipitation will not occur. The bubble point pressure has a significant influence on asphaltene precipitation. Peyman et al. [46] designed a high-pressure unit and explored the effect of pressure on asphaltene deposition through experiments. It was found that when the pressure range was between 3 MPa and 14 MPa, the higher the pressure, the more asphaltene that was deposited.
Regarding component factors, Pu [47] found that when the content of the four components of resin, asphaltene, alkane, and aromatic hydrocarbon in the crude oil system was in a specific proportion range, the crude oil system was in a stable state. Li [38] also mentioned that asphaltenes and alkanes are not conducive to the stability of crude oil systems. At the same time, resins and aromatic hydrocarbons are conducive to the stability of crude oil systems.
In order to study the stability of asphaltene deposition more accurately, Cruz et al. [48] used a changing chamber equipped with a near-infrared probe to study the process of asphaltene deposition caused by carbon dioxide and evaluated the effects of pressure, temperature, asphaltene concentration, and system composition on asphaltene deposition. The asphaltene deposition process was simulated using the cubic positive correlation method. The results show that the temperature and oil model system composition are the main parameters that affect the stability of asphaltene. However, some people think that the resin also affects the stability of asphaltene. When the resin content is high, the asphaltene is not easy to precipitate, and when the resin content is low, the asphaltene becomes unstable and easy to precipitate [49]. Yena et al. [50] proposed to use the colloid instability index (CII) (the ratio of asphaltenes and saturated hydrocarbons to the content of aromatic hydrocarbons and resins) to measure the instability of asphaltene molecules. Although the CII is an empirical formula based on oilfield data, it can be used as a preliminary screening tool to identify possible precipitation problems in a crude oil system. When the CII is less than 0.7, asphaltene is considered stable, and when the CII is greater than 0.9, asphaltene is considered unstable. Zou [51] found that with the increase in system pressure, concentration difference, and molecular diffusion, the resin around the asphaltene become dispersed, which reduces the repulsive force between asphaltene micelles and the ability of the oil phase to carry asphaltene. Zhou [52] found that polar solid asphaltene micelles attract each other. When the gravitational force is greater than the buoyancy force, sedimentation occurs. When the pressure is greater than the minimum miscibility pressure, a single-phase state is formed. The increase in pressure and density makes the system more stable, and the precipitation of asphaltene decreases.

2.1.2. Accumulation and Deposition of Asphaltenes

Researchers studied the aggregation and precipitation behavior of asphaltenes by various experimental methods, such as X-ray scattering and small-angle neutron scattering. Studies confirmed that asphaltenes are dispersed in crude oil as nanoparticles in the natural state [53].
When dissolved in organic solvents, asphaltene molecules can complex with each other to form different layers of polymers. The critical nano-aggregate concentration (CNAC) of asphaltene in toluene solution was measured by high-quality ultrasound. The experimental results show that when the asphaltene concentration is lower than the CNAC, the asphaltene molecules in toluene are dispersed into the real solution. When the asphaltene concentration is higher than the CNAC, the molecules stick together to form nano-aggregates or nano-molecules. The concentration of asphaltenes from real molecular solutions to nano-aggregates is deficient (mass fraction is about 10−4), and the number of asphaltene monomers in aggregates is very minimal [54]. DC conductivity measurements also confirmed the results of high-quality ultrasound studies. By comparing the changes in conductivity when the concentration was lower or higher than the CNAC, it was shown that the aggregation number of asphaltenes may be very small (<10) [55]. In order to confirm this result, NMR measurements observed changes in rotational relaxation at the CNAC [56]. Centrifugal tests also showed that asphaltenes precipitated above the CNAC increased [57,58].
Other analyses were undertaken, such as small-angle neutron scattering, Langmuir–Blodgett film studies, atomic force microscopy measurements, and surface compression analysis of asphaltenes in toluene. It was also confirmed that there are about ten asphaltene monomers in nanoscale asphaltene aggregates in toluene solution [59,60]. Once nano-aggregates are formed between asphaltenes, and the concentration of asphaltenes in the solution is much larger than the critical nano-aggregate concentration (CNAC), a secondary aggregation process will occur between asphaltenes.
This stage is usually called the flocculation of nano-aggregates to form asphaltene nanoclusters. Photon correlation spectroscopy shows a critical cluster concentration in the secondary aggregation process. At this critical cluster concentration, the flocculation kinetics change significantly [61]. The DC conductivity experiment of asphaltene solution confirmed that the fracture of the conductivity curve can be observed at the critical cluster concentration of asphaltene [55]. This is also consistent with the flocculation determination of asphaltene by near-infrared spectroscopy [62].
American scientist Mullins has done much research on the structure of asphaltene [34,63,64]. Based on the research progress in the molecular weight, molecular structure, and aggregation characteristics of asphaltene, the asphaltene is described more accurately, and the model proposed by Yen was improved to provide a more accurate asphaltene structure, namely, the Yen–Mullin model, as shown in Figure 5. The graded asphaltene aggregation model in the improved Yen–Mullin model is a typical theoretical model of the asphaltene aggregation–flocculation process, which is generally accepted at present. In this model, six asphaltene molecules coalesce to form asphaltene nano-aggregates, and asphaltene nano-aggregates further flocculate to form asphaltene clusters. The asphaltene cluster contains eight asphaltene nanoclusters. According to the aggregation flocculation theory of asphaltenes, asphaltenes in the solution first forms polymers through intermolecular interactions. When the size and quantity of the polymer in the system reach the critical condition, the polymer further combines to form flocs.
Hu [65] employed molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the interaction between asphaltene aggregates and various solvents under constant temperature and pressure, aiming to simulate the carbon dioxide injection process. The results revealed that prior to CO2 injection, asphaltenes were uniformly dispersed within light components, such as methane, ethane, and octane; however, following the CO2 injection, mutual solubility was observed between the CO2 and light components, excluding asphaltenes, leading to asphaltene precipitation. This was attributed to the non-polar nature of CO2, which enhances both the hydrogen bonding and dipole interactions within asphaltene aggregates, while also significantly amplifying π-π charge transfer interactions. Consequently, an increased presence of aromatic clusters and heteroatoms in asphaltenes leads to a more pronounced deposition phenomenon upon carbon dioxide injection. Fang et al. [66] arrived at a similar conclusion using the same methodology, demonstrating that carbon dioxide gradually dissolves saturated hydrocarbons and resins, leading to the formation of asphaltene deposition.
Salehzadeh et al. [67] investigated the aggregation and adsorption/deposition behavior of asphaltene samples extracted from light, medium, and heavy oils. The findings revealed that asphaltenes and subcomponents with higher aromaticity exhibited enhanced tendencies for aggregation and adsorption/deposition, whereas lower aromaticity and longer side chains contributed to improved steric hindrance. The investigation of three distinct sub-components of medium-oil asphaltenes revealed that the stabilization of asphaltene sub-components with higher solubility resulted in a reduction in both aggregation and adsorption rates of asphaltenes with lower solubility.

2.2. Mechanism of Nano-Asphalt Inhibitor

The strong polarity of the asphaltene surface is the fundamental reason for the self-association and even deposition of asphaltene molecules. Under the action of nanoparticles, asphaltene can use its strong polarity to inhibit asphaltene deposition and stably disperse in the crude oil system. On the one hand, by modifying the nanoparticles, the charge distribution on the surface of the particles can be changed, and the particles can adsorb asphaltenes after entering the reservoir, avoiding the aggregation and deposition of asphaltenes; on the other hand, nanoparticles can be grafted onto the surface so that the surface of the particles has a corresponding polar group. Therefore, after entering the reservoir, it will interact with asphaltene molecules to promote the stable dispersion of asphaltene. The adsorption of nanoparticles will inhibit the deposition process of asphaltene (Figure 6). After the injection of nanofluids, asphaltenes will be adsorbed by nanoparticles and stably dispersed in the crude oil system [68,69].
Nanoparticles can adsorb asphaltenes in crude oil and then be adsorbed on the surface of porous media, thereby delaying the flocculation behavior of asphaltenes with pressure, temperature, and composition changes, and changing their surface wettability according to the wetting preference of nanoparticles [70,71,72]. Mohammadi [73] found that 80% TiO2 nanocomposites had a higher stability and surface area than TiO2 nanoparticles. Hence, the adsorption of asphaltene on the surface of the particles increased, which increased the occurrence of asphaltene flocculation and was difficult to deposit. The adsorption process of nanoparticles on asphaltene is affected by many factors, such as the contact time, water content, temperature, and other molecules. Nassar et al. [74] found that the adsorption rate, affinity, and adsorption capacity of nanoparticles to asphaltenes depend on the relative molecular mass of asphaltenes. The smaller the relative molecular mass of asphaltenes, the greater the adsorption rate and the greater the adsorption capacity. The adsorption process of asphaltene on nanoparticles occurs in a relatively short time, and the magnetism of metal nanoparticles plays a vital role in the adsorption of asphaltene. In addition, pure asphaltene has a more robust adsorption capacity than asphalt or soft asphalt, which indicates that the degree of adsorption is affected by the chemical properties, molecular size, and structure of the crude oil components.
The adsorption model of nanoparticles on asphaltenes is still controversial. At present, the most widely accepted are the Langmuir adsorption model and the Freundlich adsorption model [75]. The Langmuir adsorption model represents a uniform monolayer adsorption. Although the asphaltene aggregates are heterogeneous, it is a reasonable and practical model for the dense layer of asphaltene aggregates with low concentration adsorption. Studies showed that the equilibrium adsorption data are in good agreement with the Langmuir model, confirming the rationality of the model [74,76]. The Freundlich adsorption model simulated the multi-layer adsorption structure of the heterogeneous surface. Nassar et al. found that the experimental data were significantly different from the calculated values of the model when using the Langmuir adsorption model for data fitting. Then, the Freundlich model was used to adjust the experimental data of the asphaltene adsorption isotherm. It was found that the data were in good agreement, indicating that the asphaltene was adsorbed to the heterogeneous surface through multi-layer adsorption [71,77].
The self-association between asphaltene molecules will accelerate the flocculation and deposition of asphaltene. According to the colloid theory, the dispersion effect of nanoparticles on asphaltenes is mainly due to the formation of a more stable interaction force between nanoparticles and asphaltene molecules or the formation of steric hindrance, thereby destroying the self-association between asphaltene molecules, thereby achieving the effect of inhibiting asphaltene deposition and removing asphaltene aggregates. Setoodeh et al. [78] synthesized Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles by the co-precipitation method. PT, MOF, GO, SiO2, and chitosan coatings were modifiers to enhance their adsorption properties for asphaltenes. It was found that the magnetic nanoparticles coated with polythiophene (PT) had better inhibition performance for asphaltene deposition in crude oil. This is because there are multiple sulfur heterocycles in the PT structure, which makes PT have higher polarity and can interact with N, S, and O heteroatoms in asphaltene molecules. Compared with other coated and uncoated nanoparticles, polarity, electrostatic, or van der Waals interactions lead to the enhanced adsorption of asphaltenes.

3. Asphaltene Nano-Inhibitors

Asphaltene deposition will inevitably occur in wellbores, production facilities, and transportation facilities, and corresponding measures must be taken to remove the deposited asphaltene. Before deposition, adequate measures need to be taken to avoid the precipitation of asphaltenes as much as possible. The methods of cleaning asphaltene deposition include physical removal, heat treatment, the chemical solvent method, the microbial method, and external force. The methods to prevent asphaltene precipitation are mainly various asphaltene dispersants/precipitation inhibitors.
Nanomaterials refer to solid materials with at least one dimension in the range of 0.1~100 nm in three-dimensional space, and are known as new materials across the century [79]. As early as 1959, American physicist Richard Feynman proposed that if the arrangement of materials on a small scale could be controlled, many substances with unique physical and chemical properties could appear. The natural synthesis of nanomaterials occurred in the 1980s. Professor H. Gleiter from Saarland University in Germany and Dr. Siegl from Argonne Laboratory in the United States successfully synthesized nanomaterials, which attracted wide attention. At the nanometer scale, the performance of particles is entirely different from that of large-scale particles [80]. The classical theory is no longer practical, and various special properties are possible.
In recent years, researchers around the world have carried out research on the use of a variety of nanomaterials to explore the inhibitory effect of nanoparticles on asphaltene deposition in reservoirs under different conditions and the influence of nanoparticle types on the inhibitory effect. At present, the nanoparticles used in the direction of enhanced oil recovery are mainly divided into three categories: metal oxide nanoparticles, organic nanoparticles, and inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles [81].

3.1. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

Metal oxide nanoparticles, which are typically composed of one or more metal ions and oxygen ions, possess unique properties, such as high crystal structure, surface energy, and activity. Due to the low ionization potential and electronegativity of metal elements, the surface of metal oxides exhibits strong polarity. With the advancement of nanotechnology in recent years, metal oxide nanoparticles have been widely applied in various fields. The researchers found that metal oxides, such as Co3O4, NiO, and Fe3O4, have good catalytic ability, which can catalyze the decomposition of asphaltene [82,83]. Substances such as asphalt are adsorbed on the nanoparticles, disintegrate the viscoelastic network, and finally catalyze the formation of H2S, CH4, CO2, H2, and other substances, reducing the content of asphaltene in heavy oil. Iron oxide, Al2O3, NiO, ZnO, and other nanoparticles have also been used in the field of inhibiting asphaltene deposition, and some research results were achieved. It was found that metal oxide nanoparticles inhibited asphaltene deposition, mainly through adsorption [84].
Mercado et al. [85] investigated the catalytic and adsorption properties of five transition metal oxide nanoparticles, namely, MnO2, MoO3, NiO, Fe2O3, and V2O5, in the low-temperature oxidation (LTO) of asphaltenes. The results showed that the five nanoparticles all showed a certain catalytic line, which promoted low-temperature oxidation, among which Fe2O3, MnO2, and MoO3 performed better. The author posited that the redox properties were substantiated as correlated parameters for promoting the oxygen addition reaction in low-temperature oxidation processes. Simultaneously, these five nanoparticles also demonstrate exceptional asphaltene adsorption characteristics. Furthermore, it is considered that the oxidation activation energy of heavy oil in the LTO region exhibits an inverse relationship with the Langmuir affinity constant; specifically, a higher asphaltene/nanocatalyst affinity corresponds to a lower activation energy.
Mohammadi et al. [86] found that rutile nanoparticles (TiO2) can effectively improve the stability of asphaltenes in acidic media (pH < 4). However, in an alkaline environment, these nanoparticles cannot prevent the deposition of asphaltenes. Lu et al. [87] found that the injection of Al2O3 nanofluids can inhibit the deposition of asphaltenes on the surface of sand bodies in porous media, thereby reducing the permeability of crude oil. A 0.5 wt% nanoparticle concentration and 0.1 nanofluid/CO2 slug volume ratio are considered the optimum for inhibiting asphaltenes damage during CO2 flooding. Shojaati et al. [88] showed that the acidic nanoparticles γ-Al2O3 and NiO have better performance inhibiting asphaltene deposition than amphoteric nanoparticles Fe3O4, which can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 7. This is because acidic metal nanoparticles can polarize with asphaltene molecules, and the polar interaction between acidic nanoparticles and asphaltene is stronger than that of amphoteric nanoparticles. At the same time, compared with NiO nanoparticles, γ-Al2O3 has better performance. The author believed that acidic nanoparticles with Bronsted acid sites have more vital polarity and a stronger ability to form bonds with asphaltene molecules, and thus, the effect of inhibiting asphaltene deposition is better.
Iron oxide nanoparticles have attracted extensive attention due to their superparamagnetism, easy stability, and easy surface functionalization [89]. These kinds of known magnetic molecules mainly include “Fe3O4 magnetite, FeIIFeIII2O4, ferromagnetic, superparamagnetic (Size < 15 nm), α-Fe2O3 (hematite, weakly ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic), γ-Fe2O3 (maghemite, ferrimagnetic), FeO (wüstite, antiferromagnetic), ε-Fe2O3 and β-Fe2O3”. Strong paramagnetic compounds have more prominent adsorption, which is due to the strong electron pairing tendency caused by the spin of unpaired electrons.
Kazemzadeh et al. [90] studied the effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation by an IFT experiment. From Table 2, it can be seen that in the solution containing B-type asphaltene, the inhibitory effect of nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation is more evident than that in the solution containing N-type asphaltene, indicating that the performance of nanoparticles varies significantly with the type of asphaltene in the solution. The author believed that this is because the nitrogen content of B-type asphaltene is greater than that of N-type asphaltene, and the H/C ratio is smaller than that of N-type asphaltene. That is, a low H/C ratio and high nitrogen content are beneficial to the adsorption of asphaltene on the surface of nanoparticles; the higher the mass fraction of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, the lower the strength of asphaltene deposition. However, Nassar et al. [91] found that metal oxide nanoparticles show strong affinity and catalytic activity for the adsorption and oxidation of asphaltenes. The interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent was used as the adsorption constant, and the order was NiO > Co3O4 > Fe3O4. The affinity constant of NiO was the highest, that is, it produced a stronger interaction, and thus, NiO exhibited the highest catalytic rate. The adsorption of Fe3O4 was the lowest, showing the lowest catalytic activity.
Although most of the recent research focused on a single nanoparticle, polymer-functionalized metal oxide nanoparticles have attracted more and more attention in recent years. Researchers synthesized NiO/SAPO-5 [92], NiO/ZSM-5 [93], Fe3O4-polythiophene [94], carboxylate-aluminoxane [95], and other composite nanoparticles, and found that they exhibit more excellent performance in inhibiting asphaltene.
Bagherpour et al. [95] prepared two kinds of carboxylate–alumoxane nanoparticles using boehmite and pseudo-boehmite as raw materials. The structure is shown in Figure 8. The results demonstrate that with the increase of nanoparticle concentration, the adsorption efficiency of asphaltene also increases due to the existence of more adsorption sites, but the increase of nanoparticle number will reduce the adsorption capacity of a single nanoparticle. Nanoparticles with a large specific surface area and pore volume and small size have better adsorption capacity, higher adsorption efficiency, and better inhibition performance. Through the Freundlich isothermal curve, it was found that the carboxylate–alumoxane nanoparticles delayed the starting point of asphaltene precipitation, which helps to reduce the amount of asphaltene precipitation. At the same time, the author studied the mechanism of the adsorption phenomenon, which was attributed to molecular interactions, including hydrogen bonding, Lewis acid–base interaction, π-π interaction, and hydrophobic interaction.
Setoodeh et al. [94] compared the adsorption of asphaltene on Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Fe3O4 polythiophene nanocomposites and found that the adsorption capacity of the magnetite surface can be improved by coating polythiophene on the surface of nanoparticles. The adsorption rates of asphaltene on nanoparticles and nanocomposites were 65.94% and 78.98%, respectively. Tazikeh [96] discussed the inhibitory effect of polythiophene-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the asphaltene precipitation and surface morphology. Atomic force microscopy imaging technology was used to obtain surface morphology information, and the effect of nanoparticles on the surface morphology was evaluated by double fractal and double Gaussian theory. This study found that the morphology of the asphaltene surface changed after the addition of nanoparticles. In the case of heavy synthetic oil, more asphaltenes were adsorbed on the nanoparticles. The author believed that in the case of heavy synthetic oil, multi-layer asphaltenes (chemisorption or adsorption type III) were formed, and more asphaltenes were adsorbed on the nanoparticles. Rezvani et al. [97] also tried to compound chitosan, TiO2, SiO2, and Fe3O4 nanoparticles to prepare Fe3O4-based nanocomposites and carried out asphalt adsorption tests. The results were Fe3O4/chitosan > Fe3O4/TiO2 > Fe3O4/SiO2 > Fe3O4. The composite material had a significant effect on inhibiting asphaltene deposition.
Scientists found that Co3O4 nanoparticles, which are also superparamagnetic, exhibit better asphaltene adsorption than Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which can significantly reduce interfacial tension and minimum miscibility pressure [98]. Meanwhile, in their investigation of Co3O4’s inhibition of asphaltene deposition, Wang et al. [99] synthesized Co3O4-SiO2 nanoparticles coated with a SiO2 film using the sol–gel method. It was observed that the presence of pores larger than 10 nm on the surface of Co3O4-SiO2 nanoparticles decreased significantly when compared with pure Co3O4 nanoparticles. Conversely, there was a notable increase in narrow mesopores (<10 nm). Additionally, the specific surface area increased from 20.87 m2/g to 29.25 m2/g, while the saturated adsorption capacity rose from 1.24 mg/m2 to 1.53 mg/m2.

3.2. Organic Nanoparticles

In this article, “organic” refers to the traditional definition of a compound containing carbon in all structures. Carbon is the sixth element in the periodic table of elements and one of the most abundant elements in the universe. This black powder comprises spherical nanoparticles with unique properties, which are usually synthesized by hydrothermal processes. These particles can be surface modified as expected, combining organic molecules or polymers onto the surface of the particles.
Gandomar et al. [100] experimentally studied the effect of asphaltene inhibitors by injecting CO2 mixed with TiO2, SiO2, MgO, and graphene oxide (GO) as DAIs (direct asphaltene inhibitors) into crude oil. The results of the static test are shown in Table 3, and the use of nanoparticles as inhibitors of direct asphaltenes was reduced. Asphaltene precipitation using 100 ppm GO decreased from 5.8 wt% to 3.1 wt%, which was more effective at reducing the amount of asphaltene precipitation than other DAIs considered in this study. The authors believed that the specific surface area of GO (890 m2/g) is higher than that of TiO2 (174.5 m2/g), SiO2 (590 m2/g), and MgO (300 m2/g). Therefore, it led to more asphaltene adsorption. Induchoodan et al. [101] studied how the incorporation of graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles affects the structural stability of asphaltene aggregates in asphalt. The author studied the GO–asphaltene aggregates. From the results of Figure 9, it can be seen that the precipitated sample contains a large agglomeration structure, and the surface adsorbs smaller particles, as shown in Figure 9a. Figure 9c shows that these particles with a particle size less than 100 nm have different contrasts compared with the agglomerates. Therefore, according to this preliminary observation, it can be predicted that the large block structure seen in Figure 9a is a graphene oxide sheet.
In the study of organic nanoparticles, Thao et al. [102] modified the surface of iron oxide nanoparticles by introducing organic long-chain acrylic acid and 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic-acid-containing polar groups, which not only retained the characteristics of nanoparticles themselves, but also had strong polarity. The modified nanoparticles have the ability to form a strong interaction or steric hindrance with asphaltene. As shown in Figure 10, when the nanoparticles are prepared as a nanofluid suspension, are injected into the reservoir, and enter between the resin and the asphaltene, they will bind to the asphaltene through dipole interactions, charge transfers, and hydrogen bonding. Then, an alkyl space stable layer is established on the surface of the asphaltene molecule, thereby dispersing the asphaltene and avoiding the self-association of the asphaltene, thereby stabilizing the asphaltene so that it cannot be deposited.
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) are usually defined as small carbon nanoparticles with a particle size of less than 10 nm and various surface passivation modifications [103]. The composition and structure of CQDs determine their different characteristics. There are heterogeneous hydroxyl and carboxyl groups on the surface of CQDs, which can promote the capture of holes by surface passivation and other methods. Therefore, CQDs have good water solubility and biocompatibility [104]. They have shown great application potential in improving oil recovery by changing the wettability, reducing the oil–water interfacial tension, reducing the crude oil viscosity, and changing the oil–water mobility ratio [105,106,107]. At the same time, compared with nanoparticles, such as SiO2 and Fe3O4, CQDs have the advantage of better compatibility with the asphaltene molecule structure and are potential materials for solving the problem of asphaltene deposition.
Alemi et al. [108] synthesized a new type of carbon nanoparticles to inhibit/disperse the deposition and aggregation of asphaltenes in unstable crude oil. The experimental results show that when the concentration of carbon nanoparticles was 400 ppm, the initial time of asphaltene precipitation was delayed from 26 vol% n-C7 to 37 vol% n-C7, which was attributed to the ultra-high specific surface area of carbon nanoparticles. DLS analysis showed that the average particle size of asphaltene aggregates decreased from 1730 nm of blank oil to 255 nm after carbon nanoparticle treatment. DFT simulation results show that there is a strong hydrogen bond interaction between the functional groups of carbon nanoparticles and the active sites of asphaltene, and there is a π-π interaction between the electron cloud of the asphaltene aromatic ring and carbon nanoparticles.
Ye et al. [109] synthesized oil-soluble carbon quantum dots (HCQDs) by the one-step microwave method, with an average particle size of 2.3 nm and a size distribution between 0.5 and 4 nm. The synthesized HCQDs exhibit a complete structure, uniform particle size, and excellent solubility in oil. It was found that in the presence of CQDs, the starting point of asphaltene precipitation could be delayed from 45 V% to 54 V%, the average particle size of asphaltene aggregates could be reduced from 1200 nm to about 600 nm, and the particle size distribution range of asphaltene aggregates was significantly narrowed, which effectively improved the particle size distribution of asphaltene aggregates.

3.3. Inorganic Nonmetal Nanoparticles

The most widely used inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles are SiO2 nanoparticles. Aghajanzadeh et al. [110] pointed out that silica nanoparticles have the ability to inhibit asphaltene deposition. Compared with the initial state, the relative permeability of the oil phase of the core after asphaltene deposition decreases significantly, and the residual oil saturation increases. After treatment with silica nanofluids, the effective permeability increases, the residual oil saturation decreases, and the degree of damage to the core decreases.
Kazemzadeh et al. [111] compared SiO2, NiO, and Fe3O4 nanoparticles, all of which can adsorb asphaltene, but SiO2 nanoparticles have a better effect. At the same time, as shown in Figure 11, with the increase in pressure, the number of asphaltenes precipitated and deposited in crude oil decreases because under high-pressure conditions, the wettability of nanofluids changes to a water-wet state better. Nanoparticles mainly reduce the deposition of asphaltenes by adsorbing asphaltene particles, and this adsorption increases with increasing pressure. Lu et al. [112] studied the inhibitory effect of nanoparticles (NiO, SiO2, and Fe3O4) on the aggregation of asphaltene particles in water-wet micropores, and found that it can effectively prevent the aggregation of asphaltene and improve the stability of asphaltene in microcapillaries. On the other hand, nanoparticles can prevent the flocculation of asphaltene particles. This is mainly due to the high surface-to-volume ratio, good adsorption capacity, and high suspension of nanoparticles. In the presence of nanoparticles, suspended asphaltene aggregates with smaller particle sizes were observed in the microcapillaries. The number of asphaltene aggregates was more than without nanoparticles, and the particle size distribution was narrower.
In addition, unlike metal oxide nanoparticles, SiO2 nanoparticles can not only adsorb asphaltenes but also achieve surface functionalization using grafting, thereby inhibiting the deposition of asphaltenes by dispersion. Zeinab et al. [113,114] studied synthesized silica–polyacrylamide nanocomposites and investigated their performance in inhibiting asphaltenes in unstable crude oil in water-based nanofluids. It was found that the presence of nanocomposites reduced the particle size of asphaltene aggregates. The results also show that the crude oil aggregates after nanocomposite treatment were more dispersed, and nanocomposites could improve the dispersion efficiency and dispersion of asphaltenes. The authors believed that it was the strong hydrogen bonds and London dispersion between the nanocomposites and asphaltenes that led to the successful adsorption of asphaltene aggregates, thereby inhibiting the aggregation and precipitation of asphaltenes.

3.4. Inhibition Effects of Different Nanoparticles

The inhibitory effect of nanoparticles on asphaltene deposition is complex. The type, concentration, preparation method, reaction temperature, and reaction time of nanoparticles have a great influence on their properties. Franco et al. [115] measured the adsorption isotherms of 12 nanoparticle asphaltenes and reservoir rocks and found that the adsorption of asphaltenes is closely related to the type of nanoparticles. The surface chemistry and morphology of nanoparticles and the chemical and physical properties of asphaltenes determine the surface adsorption of asphaltenes.
Table 4 summarizes the results of different nanoparticles applied to asphaltene adsorption. Compared with commercial nanoparticles (NPs), in situ prepared NPs have a higher viscosity before and after centrifugation, which is because they have a high degree of dispersion. At the same time, nanocomposites have a higher selectivity for asphaltene adsorption than uncoated NPs, which may be due to the increase in interaction sites and the interaction strength between asphaltene and coated NPs.

4. Numerical Simulations of Asphaltene Nano-Inhibitors

In addition to indoor physical experiments, numerical simulation studies on the inhibition of asphaltene deposition by nanoparticles were also gradually carried out in recent years. Bai et al. [120] selected asphaltene model molecules with heteroatoms (N, O, S) at different positions as adsorbents and studied their adsorption and desorption behavior on silica by molecular dynamics simulations. During the adsorption process, the asphaltene molecules move to the silica surface, and the asphaltene polyaromatic surface exhibits different orientations with the silica surface in the equilibrium state. Some molecules are in almost face-to-face contact with the silica surface, while others are adsorbed on the edge of the polyaromatic surface or the alkane side chain. This is mainly attributed to the balance between the asphaltene–silica interaction and π-π stacking interaction between asphaltene molecules. The numerical simulation study also pointed out that the presence of heteroatoms (N, O, S) enhances the polar interaction between asphaltenes and silica, hindering their desorption from the surface.
Mohammed et al. [121] used the classical molecular dynamics simulation method to study the structure and transport behavior of heavy multi-aromatic compounds with different structures in SiO2 nanopores. The simulation found that asphaltene molecules near the solid surface are first adsorbed. Then, other asphaltene molecules are adsorbed on these molecules to form dimers, trimers, or nano-aggregates at the pore entrance and pore surface. The van der Waals interaction and electrostatic interaction between the asphaltene and SiO2 surface are the main reasons for the adsorption of asphaltene.
Nassar et al. [122] proposed a population balance model that assumes that asphaltenes are related to aggregation and fragmentation at shear rates to describe the kinetics of asphaltene flocculation and fragmentation in the presence of metal oxide nanoparticles. As a result, under different conditions, all nanoparticles reduce the hydrodynamic radius of large aggregates in the solution to varying degrees. Varamesh et al. [123] used the cubic correlation equation of state to simulate the precipitation of asphaltene in reservoir model oil in the presence or absence of Fe3O4 and NiO nanoparticles. The simulation results show that the self-association energy of asphaltene changes exponentially with the molar density of the surface of the two nanoparticles.
Madhi et al. [124] carried out adsorption experiments on three kinds of metal oxide nanoparticles (SiO2, Al2O3, and MgO), and investigated the inhibitory effect of each nanoparticle on asphaltene. Four isothermal adsorption models, namely, Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich, were used to analyze the adsorption data to better understand the adsorption mechanism. In these models, Dubinin–Radushkevich gave a better prediction. Mohammadi et al. [86] used the response surface methodology (RSM) to characterize TiO2/SiO2 nanofluids by combining experimental and simulation methods. The results showed that the RSM could establish a reasonable model for the delay or inhibition of the asphaltene flocculation process. When the salinity decreases, the occurrence time of asphaltene flocculation increases. At high salinity, the repulsive force decreases significantly, which increases the agglomeration rate between these particles and slightly reduces the efficiency. The observed phenomena align with the DLVO (Deryagin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek) theory, which posits that colloidal particles primarily experience van der Waals attraction and electrostatic repulsion. The resultant force’s magnitude and direction play a crucial role in determining the stability of the colloidal system.

5. Field Application of Nano-Asphaltene Deposition Inhibitor

At present, the asphaltene inhibitors used in oilfields are mostly traditional organic asphaltene inhibitors, such as benzene ring surfaceactive substances, while nanoscale asphaltene inhibitors are still in the laboratory test stage. However, some oilfields have carried out nanoscale application tests.
In order to reduce the asphaltene precipitation near the well in the Cupiagua Sur oilfield in Colombia, a field test of nano-huff-and-puff was carried out in well CPSXL4. In this outward-facing formation, 220 barrels of nanofluid containing Al2O3 nanoparticles were injected. After eight months of operation tracking, the results showed that the asphaltene content in the produced oil of the well remained stable, and the oil production exceeded the baseline by about 300 barrels/day. By tracking and measuring the concentration of nanoparticles in the production water, it can be concluded that with the increase in operation time, the inhibition process of asphaltene deposition was effective, and the oil production remained above the baseline [125]. It can be seen that the application of nanotechnology in the Cupiagua Sur oilfield is booming, which confirms that the adsorption of asphaltene molecules by nanoparticles is effective.
Similarly, field applications were also performed in five wells in the Tenay light oil field (API 36°) in Colombia. The reservoir temperature was 220 °F and the reservoir pressure was 2300 psi. During the design operation, the nanofluid was forced into a radius of 4 feet. After a certain period (10–12 months) of operation tracking, the oil production of each well increased by about 60 barrels per day, the decline curve was significantly improved, the benefit was maintained for more than 12 months, and the total oil production increased by about 249,000 barrels. The measurement of residual nanoparticles in the production solution shows that nanoparticles with a concentration as low as 2 ppm can inhibit asphaltene precipitation. Compared with other conventional treatments, the results show a better effect [126].
Although conventional asphaltene inhibitors are mainly used to deal with asphaltene deposition during reservoir development, the inhibition effect of conventional asphaltene inhibitors tends to be greatly reduced when asphaltene deposition occurs in volatile reservoirs because the high flow rate and high pressure drop will hinder the retention of asphaltene inhibitors in the formation. Under the conditions of a specific reservoir and specific nanofluid concentration, nanoparticles can effectively inhibit asphaltene deposition, which is beneficial to further improve the oil recovery of low-permeability reservoirs. Different types of nanoparticles have different inhibitory effects on asphaltene deposition. Iron, cobalt, and nickel oxide nanoparticles can effectively adsorb asphaltene and inhibit asphaltene deposition better. Although the current research on the inhibition of asphaltene deposition by nanoparticles is still mainly focused on the indoor research stage, the successful test in the oil field shows the application potential of this technology.

6. Conclusions

This paper investigates the phenomenon of asphaltene deposition that may occur following crude oil system disruption, discusses the mechanism of asphaltene precipitation, and reviews three types of nano-asphaltene deposition inhibitors. The authors summarize current asphaltene inhibitors as follows for reference:
(1)
The main factors that affect asphaltene precipitation are temperature, pressure, and composition. Temperature and oil composition are the main parameters that affect the stability of asphaltene. At the same time, it is believed that the colloid in the oil component mainly affects the stability of asphaltene. When the resin content is high, asphaltene is not easy to precipitate. When the resin content is low, the asphaltene becomes unstable and easy to precipitate. From the mechanism of action of the inhibitor, the nanoparticles cannot aggregate by adsorbing asphaltene molecules to inhibit precipitation; at the same time, it was shown that the grafted nanoparticles can also promote the dispersion stability of asphaltene molecules in crude oil.
(2)
At present, the inhibitors with future development prospects are nano-inhibitors. These inhibitors are mainly divided into metal oxide nanoparticles, organic nanoparticles, and inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles.
  • Metal oxide nanoparticles mainly include CaO, Co3O4, and Fe3O4. These nanoparticles have attracted extensive attention due to their superparamagnetism, stability, and easy surface functionalization.
  • In the study of organic nanoparticles, the surface modification of nanoparticles is mainly used. A long organic chain containing a polar group is introduced, and it has dual properties by grafting. This not only retains the characteristics of the nanoparticles themselves, but also has a strong polarity and can form a strong interaction or steric hindrance with asphaltenes. At the same time, quantum dot nanoparticles also showed an excellent inhibitory effect on asphaltene deposition.
  • In the investigation of inorganic nonmetal nanoparticles, particularly SiO2 nanoparticles, they exhibit not only adsorption capability toward asphaltenes but also enable surface functionalization through grafting, thereby impeding asphaltene deposition by promoting dispersion.
(3)
Nanoparticles have a larger specific surface area and adsorption capacity, have better suspension and catalytic performances, and are less likely to cause reservoir damage than chemical agents. Therefore, they have incomparable advantages over conventional organic asphaltene inhibitors in solving the problem of asphaltene deposition. In the face of asphaltene deposition in special reservoirs, such as volatile reservoirs, it also shows a more excellent inhibition effect. However, the existing nanoparticles also show the characteristics of low stability. Due to the strong interaction, the nanoparticles are easy to aggregate, resulting in a larger size and losing the expected effect. Confirming the optimal concentration of nanoparticles will reduce the key to the precipitation and deposition of asphaltenes. Excessive concentration will not only increase the treatment cost but also reduce the ability of nanoparticles to stabilize asphaltenes, resulting in an increase in asphaltene deposition and precipitation.
The authors believe that the surface functionalization of nanoparticles or the use of stable and economical surfactants to enhance their stability, as well as developing low-cost and environmentally friendly nanofluid formulations (such as nano-surfactants, nano-polymers, and nano-microorganisms) adapted to the reservoir environment, are the key to the future application of nanofluids to inhibit asphaltene deposition and improve oil recovery. In addition, the development of the complex system of nanoparticles and conventional asphaltene inhibitors and the establishment of accurate mathematical models will also be an important direction for further development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.P. and Q.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y. and Y.P.; writing—review and editing, S.Y. and C.Y.; supervision, J.C. and Q.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the fund of the Educational Department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0417) and the fund of the Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province (2023JH2/101300238).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xu Lou, Ning Li and Mingwang Bai for their contribution to the data collected so far. All individuals have consented to the acknowledgement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, H.J.; Dong, J. Research on Asphaltene Inhibitors in Halahatang Oilfield. Petrochem. Technol. 2016, 23, 88–90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lian, P.Q.; Ma, C.Y.; Gao, M.; Feng, R.Q. Research progress in asphaltene deposition characteristics and control strategies. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2015, 15, 101–107+116. [Google Scholar]
  3. Muneer, R.; Hashmet, M.R.; Pourafshary, P. Fine Migration Control in Sandstones: Surface Force Analysis and Application of DLVO Theory. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 31624–31639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Karambeigi, M.A.; Fallah, N.; Nikazar, M.; Kharrat, R. A novel test method for evaluate asphaltene inhibitor efficiency on damage permeability. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2019, 37, 2146–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, G.T. Shallow talk about the prevention and control measures of asphaltene precipitation in Iran Yada Oilfield. Sci. Technol. Innov. 2018, 6, 3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, W.X.; Shu, F.C.; Yin, Y.C.; Yao, P.Y. Evaluation of inhibition effect of asphaltene deposition inhibitor by transmittance method. Petrochem. Appl. 2018, 37, 5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gu, Y.C.; Yuan, L.G.; Cao, G.; Yin, C.Y. Study on the mechanism and inhibitor of mixed caking of heavy oil and condensate in Tahe Oilfield Pipeline Technology and Equipment. Pipeline Tech. Equip. 2020, 1, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shu, F.C.; Zhang, W.X. Simulation Experiment on Asphalt Deposition of Iran BA Crude Oil and Inhibition of High Pressure. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2018, 18, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Papa, A.L.; Ali, T.; Benmadi, M. Experimental study on the influences of pressure and flow rates in the deposition of asphaltenes in a sandstone core sample. Fuel 2022, 310, 122420. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin, H. Evaluation and Analysis of Asphalt Deposition Inhibitors in Iran Y Oilfield. Chem. Manag. 2016, 27, 57. [Google Scholar]
  11. Qin, B.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, J.L. Research progress of crude asphaltene deposition inhibition and blockage removal technology. Pet. Refin. Chem. Eng. 2020, 51, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zeng, H.; Tessarolo, N.; Gonzalez, D.; Gramin, P.; Wicking, C.; Pietrobon, M. ”Sticky molecules” on rock surface might play an important role in formation damage due to asphaltene deposition. Fuel 2020, 277, 117983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, H.J. Prediction and Prevention of Asphaltene Deposition in Crude Oil. Master’s Thesis, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuang, J.; Yarbrough, J.; Enayat, S.; Edward, N.; Wang, J.; Vargas, F.M. Evaluation of solvents for in-situ asphaltene deposition remediation. Fuel 2019, 241, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khormali, A.; Sharifov, A.R.; Torba, D.I. The Control of Asphaltene Precipitation in Oil Wells. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Di, Q.; Hua, S.; Zhang, J.; Ye, F.; Wang, W. Research progress of reservoirs wettability alteration by using nanofluids for enhancing oil recovery. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2019, 38, 3612–3620. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lei, Q.; Luo, J.; Peng, B.; Wang, X.; Xiao, P.; Wang, P.; He, L.; Ding, B.; Geng, X. Mechanism of Expanding Swept Volume by Nano-Sized Oil-Displacement Agent. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fletcher, A.; Davis, J. How EOR Can be Transformed by Nanotechnology. In Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA, 24–28 April 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Udoh, T.H. Improved Insight on the Application of Nanoparticles in Enhanced Oil Recovery Process. Sci. Afr. 2021, 13, e00873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Di, Q.F.; Hua, S.; Zhang, J.N.; Ye, F.; Wang, W.C. Research progress in improving oil recovery by inversion of reservoir wettability with nanofluids. Progress. Chem. Ind. 2019, 38, 3612–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qu, H.Y.; Liu, Q.; Peng, B.; Luo, D.; Liu, S.X.; Liu, K.W. Effect of nanoparticles on CO2 Influence of foam system stability. Pet. Geol. Recovery 2019, 26, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qin, B.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, J. Advance of Inhibition and Plug Removal Technology for Asphaltene Deposition. Pet. Process. Petrochem. 2020, 51, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alrashidi, H.; Afra, S.; Nasr-El-Din, H.A. Application of Natural Fatty Acids as Asphaltenes Solvents with Inhibition and Dispersion Effects: A Mechanistic Study. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 172, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saeedi Dehaghani, A.H.; Badizad, M.H. Inhibiting Asphaltene Precipitation from Iranian Crude Oil Using Various Dispersants: Experimental Investigation through Viscometry and Thermodynamic Modelling. Fluid. Phase Equilibria 2017, 442, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rocha Junior, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.; da Silva Ramos, A.C. Inhibition of Asphaltene Precipitation in Brazilian Crude Oils Using New Oil Soluble Amphiphiles. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2006, 51, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ghosh, B.; Sulemana, N.; Banat, F.; Mathew, N. Ionic Liquid in Stabilizing Asphaltenes during Miscible CO2 Injection in High Pressure Oil Reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 180, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghanem, A.; Nessim, M.I.; Khalil, N.A.; El-Nagar, R.A. Imidazolium-based ionic liquids as dispersants to improve the stability of asphaltene in Egyptian heavy crude oil. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. El-Nagar, R.A.; Nessim, M.I.; Ismail, D.A.; Mohamed, M.G.; Ghanem, A. Investigation the Effect of Different Ionic Liquids Based-Aryl Imidazole on the Onset Precipitation of Asphaltene. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. El-hoshoudy, A.N.; Ghanem, A.; Desouky, S.M. Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids for Asphaltene Dispersion; Experimental and Computational Studies. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 324, 114698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guerrero-Martin, C.A.; Montes-Pinzon, D.; Meneses Motta da Silva, M.; Montes-Paez, E.; Guerrero-Martin, L.E.; Salinas-Silva, R.; Camacho-Galindo, S.; Fernandes Lucas, E.; Szklo, A. Asphaltene Precipitation/Deposition Estimation and Inhibition through Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2023, 16, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fuentes, J.F.; Montes, D.; Lucas, E.F.; Montes-Páez, E.G.; Szklo, A.; Guerrero-Martin, C.A. Nanotechnology Applied to the Inhibition and Remediation of Formation Damage by Fines Migration and Deposition: A Comprehensive Review. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 216, 110767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yen, T.F.; Erdman, J.G.; Pollack, S.S. Investigation of the Structure of Petroleum Asphaltenes by X-ray Diffraction. Anal. Chem. 1961, 33, 1587–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Murgich, J.; Abanero, J.A.; Strausz, O.P. Molecular Recognition in Aggregates Formed by Asphaltene and Resin Molecules from the Athabasca Oil Sand. Energy Fuels 1999, 13, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mullins, O.C. The Modified Yen Model. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 2179–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, D.D.; Greenfield, M.L. Chemical Compositions of Improved Model Asphalt Systems for Molecular Simulations. Fuel 2014, 115, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, L.; You, J.; Li, D. Prevention of asphaltene chokes in Ordovician oil production wells, district X, Tahe oil field. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2016, 38, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chaisoontornyotin, W.; Haji-Akbari, N.; Fogler, H.S.; Hoepfner, M.P. Combined Asphaltene Aggregation and Deposition Investigation. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1979–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, M.X. Literature Review on Asphaltene Deposition. Spec. Oil Gas. Reserv. 1996, 3, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  39. Guo, P. Summarization of the research on solid precipitation and gas-liquid-solid phase equilibrium. Spec. Oil Gas. Reserv. 2005, 12, 1–4+8. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang, Y.; Chaisoontornyotin, W.; Hoepfner, M.P. Structure of Asphaltenes during Precipitation Investigated by Ultra-Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Langmuir 2018, 34, 10371–10380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Alian, S.S.; Singh, K.; Saidu Mohamed, A.; Ismail, M.Z.; Anwar, M.L. Organic Deposition: From Detection and Laboratory Analysis to Treatment and Removal. In Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 22–24 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mohammadi, S.; Rashidi, F.; Mousavi-Dehghani, S.A.; Ghazanfari, M.-H. On the Effect of Temperature on Precipitation and Aggregation of Asphaltenes in Light Live Oils. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 94, 1820–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, J. Research Status of Gum Asphaltene in Crude Oil Pipeline. Stand. Qual. China Pet. Chem. Ind. 2012, 33, 263–264. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruan, Z.; Wang, Q. Literature Review of Asphaltene Deposition Mechanism. Contemp. Chem. Ind. 2016, 45, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  45. Burke, N.E.; Hobbs, R.E.; Kashou, S.F. Measurement and Modeling of Asphaltene Precipitation (Includes Associated Paper 23831). J. Pet. Technol. 1990, 42, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zanganeh, P.; Ayatollahi, S.; Alamdari, A.; Zolghadr, A.; Dashti, H.; Kord, S. Asphaltene Deposition during CO2 Injection and Pressure Depletion: A Visual Study. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 1412–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pu, W. Asphaltene precipitation in petroleum production. J. Southwest Pet. Inst. 1999, 21, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  48. Cruz, A.A.; Amaral, M.; Santos, D.; Palma, A.; Franceschi, E.; Borges, G.R.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Palácio, J.; Dariva, C. CO2 Influence on Asphaltene Precipitation. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 143, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Srivastava, R.K.; Huang, S.S.; Dong, M. Asphaltene Deposition during CO2 Flooding. SPE Prod. Facil. 1999, 14, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yen, A.; Yin, Y.R.; Asomaning, S. Evaluating Asphaltene Inhibitors: Laboratory Tests and Field Studies. In Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, TX, USA, 13–16 February 2001. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zou, C.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Wei, H.; Liu, B.; Zhao, J.; Yang, T.; Zhu, S.; Tao, H.; et al. Unconventional Petroleum Sedimentology: A Key to Understanding Unconventional Hydrocarbon Accumulation. Engineering 2022, 18, 62–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, X. Investigation of the Asphaltene Deposition Distribution in CO2 Flooding of Low Permeability Reservoir. Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  53. Roux, J.-N.; Broseta, D.; Demé, B. SANS Study of Asphaltene Aggregation: Concentration and Solvent Quality Effects. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5085–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Andreatta, G.; Bostrom, N.; Mullins, O.C. High-Q Ultrasonic Determination of the Critical Nanoaggregate Concentration of Asphaltenes and the Critical Micelle Concentration of Standard Surfactants. Langmuir 2005, 21, 2728–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zeng, H.; Song, Y.-Q.; Johnson, D.L.; Mullins, O.C. Critical Nanoaggregate Concentration of Asphaltenes by Direct-Current (DC) Electrical Conductivity. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lisitza, N.V.; Freed, D.E.; Sen, P.N.; Song, Y.-Q. Study of Asphaltene Nanoaggregation by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Goual, L.; Sedghi, M.; Zeng, H.; Mostowfi, F.; McFarlane, R.; Mullins, O.C. On the Formation and Properties of Asphaltene Nanoaggregates and Clusters by DC-Conductivity and Centrifugation. Fuel 2011, 90, 2480–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mostowfi, F.; Indo, K.; Mullins, O.C.; McFarlane, R. Asphaltene Nanoaggregates Studied by Centrifugation. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Orbulescu, J.; Mullins, O.C.; Leblanc, R.M. Surface Chemistry and Spectroscopy of UG8 Asphaltene Langmuir Film, Part 2. Langmuir 2010, 26, 15265–15271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gawrys, K.L.; Blankenship, G.A.; Kilpatrick, P.K. Solvent Entrainment in and Flocculation of Asphaltenic Aggregates Probed by Small-Angle Neutron Scattering. Langmuir 2006, 22, 4487–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hortal, A.R.; Martínez-Haya, B.; Lobato, M.D.; Pedrosa, J.M.; Lago, S. On the Determination of Molecular Weight Distributions of Asphaltenes and Their Aggregates in Laser Desorption Ionization Experiments. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2006, 41, 960–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Oh, K.; Deo, M.D. Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Asphaltene Aggregation in Solvents. In Asphaltenes, Heavy Oils, and Petroleomics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 469–488. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mullins, O.C. The Asphaltenes. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2011, 4, 393–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mullins, O.C.; Sabbah, H.; Eyssautier, J.; Pomerantz, A.E.; Barré, L.; Andrews, A.B.; Ruiz-Morales, Y.; Mostowfi, F.; McFarlane, R.; Goual, L.; et al. Advances in Asphaltene Science and the Yen–Mullins Model. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 3986–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hu, Y.-F.; Li, S.; Liu, N.; Chu, Y.-P.; Park, S.J.; Mansoori, G.A.; Guo, T.-M. Measurement and Corresponding States Modeling of Asphaltene Precipitation in Jilin Reservoir Oils. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2004, 41, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fang, T.; Wang, M.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Shen, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, J. Study on the Asphaltene Precipitation in CO2 Flooding: A Perspective from Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Salehzadeh, M.; Husein, M.M.; Ghotbi, C.; Taghikhani, V.; Dabir, B. Investigating the Role of Asphaltenes Structure on Their Aggregation and Adsorption/Deposition Behavior. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 230, 212204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sheng, Q.; Wang, G.; Jin, N.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, C.; Gao, J. Petroleum asphaltene micro-structure analysis and lightening. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2019, 38, 1147–1159. [Google Scholar]
  69. Li, N.; Dong, M.; Li, L.; Wang, Z. Research Advances of Chemical Structure Model of Petroleum Asphaltenes. Pet. Asph. 2014, 28, 40–48. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ye, H.; Liu, Q.; Peng, B.; Luo, D. Inhibition of nanoparticles on asphaltene deposition during CO2 flooding:A review. Oil Gas. Geol. Recovery 2020, 27, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cortés, F.B.; Mejía, J.M.; Ruiz, M.A.; Benjumea, P.; Riffel, D.B. Sorption of Asphaltenes onto Nanoparticles of Nickel Oxide Supported on Nanoparticulated Silica Gel. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 1725–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ju, B.; Fan, T.; Ma, M. Enhanced Oil Recovery by Flooding with Hydrophilic Nanoparticles. China Particuology 2006, 4, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mohammadi, M.; Akbari, M.; Fakhroueian, Z.; Bahramian, A.; Azin, R.; Arya, S. Inhibition of Asphaltene Precipitation by TiO2, SiO2, and ZrO2 Nanofluids. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 3150–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nassar, N.N.; Hassan, A.; Carbognani, L.; Lopez-Linares, F.; Pereira-Almao, P. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Rapid Adsorption and Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation of Thermally Cracked Asphaltenes. Fuel 2012, 95, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Adams, J.J. Asphaltene Adsorption, a Literature Review. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 2831–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Balabin, R.M.; Syunyaev, R.Z.; Schmid, T.; Stadler, J.; Lomakina, E.I.; Zenobi, R. Asphaltene Adsorption onto an Iron Surface: Combined Near-Infrared (NIR), Raman, and AFM Study of the Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Layer Structure. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nassar, N.N.; Hassan, A.; Pereira-Almao, P. Effect of the Particle Size on Asphaltene Adsorption and Catalytic Oxidation onto Alumina Particles. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 3961–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Setoodeh, N.; Darvishi, P.; Lashanizadegan, A. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Performance of Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles for Adsorption of Asphaltene from Crude Oil in Bench Scale. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2018, 39, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vollath, D. Nanomaterials: An introduction to synthesis, properties and application. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2008, 7, 865–870. [Google Scholar]
  80. Lines, M.G. Nanomaterials for Practical Functional Uses. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 449, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Negin, C.; Ali, S.; Xie, Q. Application of Nanotechnology for Enhancing Oil Recovery—A Review. Petroleum 2016, 2, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sviridenko, N.N.; Akimov, A.S. Characteristics of Products of Thermal and Catalytic Cracking of Heavy Oil Asphaltenes under Supercritical Water Conditions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2023, 192, 105784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Urazov, K.K.; Sviridenko, N.N. NiO Based Catalysts Obtained “In-Situ” for Heavy Crude Oil Upgrading: Effect of NiO Precursor on the Catalytic Cracking Products Composition. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 127, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, K.; Zhao, F.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Review on Application of Nanotechnology in Enhancing Oil Recovery. Contemp. Chem. Ind. 2018, 47, 1753–1756. [Google Scholar]
  85. Fabio Mercado, D.; Akimushkina, L.; Rivera-Quintero, P.A.; Valderrama-Zapata, R.; Guerrero-Amaya, H.; Ballesteros-Rueda, L.M. Comprehensive Analysis of the Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials Role as Catalysts in the Low-Temperature Oxidation of Adsorbed nC7-Asphaltenes. Fuel 2022, 327, 125179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mohammadi, M.; Dadvar, M.; Dabir, B. TiO2/SiO2 Nanofluids as Novel Inhibitors for the Stability of Asphaltene Particles in Crude Oil: Mechanistic Understanding, Screening, Modeling, and Optimization. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 238, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lu, T.; Li, Z.; Fan, W.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Q. Nanoparticles for Inhibition of Asphaltenes Deposition during CO2 Flooding. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 6723–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shojaati, F.; Riazi, M.; Mousavi, S.H.; Derikvand, Z. Experimental Investigation of the Inhibitory Behavior of Metal Oxides Nanoparticles on Asphaltene Precipitation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 531, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wu, W.; He, Q.; Jiang, C. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Surface Functionalization Strategies. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2008, 3, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kazemzadeh, Y.; Malayeri, M.R.; Riazi, M.; Parsaei, R. Impact of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles on Asphaltene Precipitation during CO2 Injection. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 2015, 22, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nassar, N.N.; Hassan, A.; Pereira-Almao, P. Comparative Oxidation of Adsorbed Asphaltenes onto Transition Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 384, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sedighi, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Sedighi, M. Green SAPO-5 supported NiO nanoparticles as a novel adsorbent for removal of petroleum asphaltenes: Financial assessment. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 171, 1433–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sedighi, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Sedighi, M.; Ghasemi, M. Biobased cadaverine as a green template in the synthesis of NiO/ZSM-5 nanocomposites for removal of petroleum asphaltenes: Financial analysis, isotherms, and kinetics study. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 7412–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Setoodeh, N.; Darvishi, P.; Esmaeilzadeh, F. Adsorption of Asphaltene from Crude Oil by Applying Polythiophene Coating on Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2018, 39, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bagherpour, S.; Riazi, M.; Riazi, M.; Cortés, F.B.; Mousavi, S.H. Investigating the Performance of Carboxylate-Alumoxane Nanoparticles as a Novel Chemically Functionalized Inhibitor on Asphaltene Precipitation. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16149–16164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tazikeh, S.; Sayyad Amin, J.; Zendehboudi, S.; Dejam, M.; Chatzis, I. Bi-Fractal and Bi-Gaussian Theories to Evaluate Impact of Polythiophene-Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles on Asphaltene Precipitation and Surface Topography. Fuel 2020, 272, 117535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rezvani, H.; Kazemzadeh, Y.; Sharifi, M.; Riazi, M.; Shojaei, S. A New Insight into Fe3O4-Based Nanocomposites for Adsorption of Asphaltene at the Oil/Water Interface: An Experimental Interfacial Study. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 177, 786–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hassanpour, S.; Malayeri, M.R.; Riazi, M. Utilization of Co3O4 Nanoparticles for Reducing Precipitation of Asphaltene during CO2 Injection. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 2016, 31, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, T.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, Z.; Farhadian, A.; Hu, J. Asphaltene Adsorption of Co3O4 Nanoparticles Modified by SiO2 Film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 602, 154267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gandomkar, A.; Reza Nasriani, H. The Role of Direct Asphaltene Inhibitors on Asphaltene Stabilization during Gas Injection. Fuel 2020, 282, 118827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Induchoodan, G.; Jansson, H.; Swenson, J. Influence of Graphene Oxide on Asphaltene Nanoaggregates. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 630, 127614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Thao, V.N.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Wang, J.X.; Aparna, S.; Yogesh, K.; Tanguy, T.; Sibani, L.B. Inhibiting Asphaltene Deposition Using Polymer-Functionalized Nanoparticles in Microfluidic Porous Media. Energy Fuels. 2023, 37, 19461–19471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cao, L.; Meziani, M.J.; Sahu, S.; Sun, Y.P. Photoluminescence Properties of Graphene versus Other Carbon Nanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dan, Y.; Ping, W.; Li, J.Y.; Jesse, L.Q.; Ya, P.S. Carbon “quantum” dots for bioapplications. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022, 247, 300–309. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wu, Y.; Cao, M.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, X.; Guo, F.; Tang, L.; Tan, X.; Wu, W.; Shi, Y.; Dai, C. Novel High-Hydrophilic Carbon Dots from Petroleum Coke for Boosting Injection Pressure Reduction and Enhancing Oil Recovery. Carbon 2021, 184, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhao, M.; Song, X.; Lv, W.; Wu, Y.; Dai, C. The Preparation and Spontaneous Imbibition of Carbon-Based Nanofluid for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tight Reservoirs. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 313, 113564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Baragau, I.-A.; Lu, Z.; Power, N.P.; Morgan, D.J.; Bowen, J.; Diaz, P.; Kellici, S. Continuous Hydrothermal Flow Synthesis of S-Functionalised Carbon Quantum Dots for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mahmoudi Alemi, F.; Mohammadi, S.; Mousavi Dehghani, S.A.; Rashidi, A.; Hosseinpour, N.; Seif, A. Experimental and DFT Studies on the Effect of Carbon Nanoparticles on Asphaltene Precipitation and Aggregation Phenomena. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 422, 130030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ye, H. Investigation of Quantum Dot-Based Nano-Fluid System for Inhibiting Asphaltene Deposition during CO2 Flooding. Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Aghajanzadeh, M.R.; Sharifi, M. Stabilizing Silica Nanoparticles in High Saline Water by Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Reduction of Asphaltene Precipitation Damage under Dynamic Condition. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kazemzadeh, Y.; Sharifi, M.; Riazi, M.; Rezvani, H.; Tabaei, M. Potential Effects of Metal Oxide/SiO2 Nanocomposites in EOR Processes at Different Pressures. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 559, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lu, N.; Dong, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, B. Effect of solvent on the adsorption behavior of asphaltene on silica surface: A molecular dynamic simulation study. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 212, 110212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hosseini-Dastgerdi, Z.; Maleki, A.; Elyassi, E.; Rashidi, A. Silica/Polyacrylamide Nanocomposite for Inhibition of Asphaltene Precipitation from Unstable Crude Oils. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Maleki, A.; Hosseini-Dastgerdi, Z.; Rashidi, A. Effect of Nanoparticle Modified Polyacrylamide on Wax Deposition, Crystallization and Flow Behavior of Light and Heavy Crude Oils. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2023, 44, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Franco, C.A.; Nassar, N.N.; Ruiz, M.A.; Pereira-Almao, P.; Cortés, F.B. Nanoparticles for Inhibition of Asphaltenes Damage: Adsorption Study and Displacement Test on Porous Media. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 2899–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nassar, N.N. Asphaltene Adsorption onto Alumina Nanoparticles: Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 4116–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ezeonyeka, N.L.; Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A.; Husein, M.M. Asphaltenes Adsorption onto Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Critical Evaluation of Measurement Techniques. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 2213–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nassar, N.N.; Hassan, A.; Pereira-Almao, P. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Asphaltene Adsorption and Oxidation. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Abu Tarboush, B.J.; Husein, M.M. Dispersed Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Preparation in Heavy Oil and Their Uptake of Asphaltenes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 113, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bai, Y.; Sui, H.; Liu, X.; He, L.; Li, X.; Thormann, E. Effects of the N, O, and S Heteroatoms on the Adsorption and Desorption of Asphaltenes on Silica Surface: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Fuel 2019, 240, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mohammed, S.; Gadikota, G. The Role of Calcite and Silica Interfaces on the Aggregation and Transport of Asphaltenes in Confinement. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 247, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nassar, N.N.; Betancur, S.; Acevedo, S.; Franco, C.A.; Cortés, F.B. Development of a Population Balance Model to Describe the Influence of Shear and Nanoparticles on the Aggregation and Fragmentation of Asphaltene Aggregates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 8201–8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Varamesh, A.; Hosseinpour, N. Prediction of Asphaltene Precipitation in Reservoir Model Oils in the Presence of Fe3O4 and NiO Nanoparticles by Cubic Plus Association Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 4293–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Madhi, M.; Bemani, A.; Daryasafar, A.; Khosravi Nikou, M.R. Experimental and Modeling Studies of the Effects of Different Nanoparticles on Asphaltene Adsorption. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zabala Romero, R.D.; Acuna, H.M.; Cortes, F.; Patino, J.E.; Cespedes Chavarro, C.; Mora, E.; Botero, O.F.; Guarin, L. Application and Evaluation of a NanoFluid Containing NanoParticles for Asphaltenes Inhibition in Well CPSXL4. In Proceedings of the OTC Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 29–31 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  126. Meneses, M.A.; Zabala, R.; Rodríguez, E.; Cortés, F.B. Asphaltenes Inhibition by Using New Generation of Nanofluids in Tenay Field (Russian). In Proceedings of the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, 24–26 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Condensation types of aromatic ring system.
Figure 1. Condensation types of aromatic ring system.
Molecules 29 01135 g001
Figure 2. Isolated island model (a) and archipelago model (b) of asphaltene.
Figure 2. Isolated island model (a) and archipelago model (b) of asphaltene.
Molecules 29 01135 g002
Figure 3. Asphaltene micelle solution.
Figure 3. Asphaltene micelle solution.
Molecules 29 01135 g003
Figure 4. Diagram of oil–asphaltene solubility parameters of live oil samples with pressure and different fixed temperatures. Taken with permission from [42].
Figure 4. Diagram of oil–asphaltene solubility parameters of live oil samples with pressure and different fixed temperatures. Taken with permission from [42].
Molecules 29 01135 g004
Figure 5. Yen–Mullin model of asphaltene coalescence flocculation.
Figure 5. Yen–Mullin model of asphaltene coalescence flocculation.
Molecules 29 01135 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of inhibiting asphaltene deposition by nanoparticle adsorption. Taken with permission from [70].
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of inhibiting asphaltene deposition by nanoparticle adsorption. Taken with permission from [70].
Molecules 29 01135 g006
Figure 7. (a) The 0.01 wt% and (b) 0.1 wt% metal oxide nanoparticles were used to determine the starting point of synthetic oil containing 0.5 wt% asphaltene. Taken with permission from [88].
Figure 7. (a) The 0.01 wt% and (b) 0.1 wt% metal oxide nanoparticles were used to determine the starting point of synthetic oil containing 0.5 wt% asphaltene. Taken with permission from [88].
Molecules 29 01135 g007aMolecules 29 01135 g007b
Figure 8. Molecular structure of carboxylate-alumoxane nanoparticles.
Figure 8. Molecular structure of carboxylate-alumoxane nanoparticles.
Molecules 29 01135 g008
Figure 9. (a) SEM image of an agglomerated structure of the precipitate. Asphaltene nano-aggregates are seen to be adsorbed on the surface of GO. (b,c) Zoomed in images of the agglomerate. Taken with permission from [101].
Figure 9. (a) SEM image of an agglomerated structure of the precipitate. Asphaltene nano-aggregates are seen to be adsorbed on the surface of GO. (b,c) Zoomed in images of the agglomerate. Taken with permission from [101].
Molecules 29 01135 g009
Figure 10. The schematic diagram of nanoparticle dispersion inhibiting asphaltene: (a) in a stable state, colloids form a solvation layer around asphaltenes; (b) CO2 injection destroys the solvation layer; and (c) nanoparticles form an alkyl space stable layer on the surface of asphaltenes. Taken with permission from [70].
Figure 10. The schematic diagram of nanoparticle dispersion inhibiting asphaltene: (a) in a stable state, colloids form a solvation layer around asphaltenes; (b) CO2 injection destroys the solvation layer; and (c) nanoparticles form an alkyl space stable layer on the surface of asphaltenes. Taken with permission from [70].
Molecules 29 01135 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of nanofluids reducing asphaltene precipitation in porous media under different pressures. Taken with permission from [111].
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of nanofluids reducing asphaltene precipitation in porous media under different pressures. Taken with permission from [111].
Molecules 29 01135 g011
Table 1. Fe3O4, γ-Al2O3, and NiO metal oxide nanoparticle specifications. Taken with permission from [88].
Table 1. Fe3O4, γ-Al2O3, and NiO metal oxide nanoparticle specifications. Taken with permission from [88].
NanoparticlesMeasured Size (nm)Specific Surface Area
(m2/g)
Chemical Nature
Fe3O415–2081.98Amphoteric
γ-Al2O320>138Acidic
NiO10–2050–100Acidic
Table 2. Comparison of the IFT slopes of the 1st to the 2nd regions for B and N asphaltene types in the absence and presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 50 °C. Taken with permission from [90].
Table 2. Comparison of the IFT slopes of the 1st to the 2nd regions for B and N asphaltene types in the absence and presence of Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 50 °C. Taken with permission from [90].
Type of
Asphaltene
Nanoparticle
wt%
Slope of the 1st RegionSlope of the 2nd RegionRatio of the
IFT Slopes of the
2nd to the 1st Regions
B-Oil
(5 wt%)
02.050.4521.95%
0.52.030.8340.89%
N-Oil
(5 wt%)
02.120.4320.28%
0.52.180.6127.98%
Table 3. The effects of GO, TiO2, SiO2, and MgO nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation as direct asphaltene inhibitors during a static test at reservoir conditions, 60 °C, and 3150 psia. Taken with permission from [100].
Table 3. The effects of GO, TiO2, SiO2, and MgO nanoparticles on asphaltene precipitation as direct asphaltene inhibitors during a static test at reservoir conditions, 60 °C, and 3150 psia. Taken with permission from [100].
DAIConcentration (ppm)Asphaltene Precipitation Static Test (wt%)
Pure CO2 5.8
GO504.0
1003.1
2002.5
3002.4
TiO25005.0
10004.2
20003.8
30003.7
SiO25004.8
10004.0
20003.5
30003.4
MgO5004.5
10003.8
20003.5
30003.5
Table 4. Performance comparison of different types of nano-asphaltene deposition inhibitors.
Table 4. Performance comparison of different types of nano-asphaltene deposition inhibitors.
NanoparticlesParticles SourcesParticle SizeAdsorption ModelBET Surface AreaAsphaltene Adsorption CapacityOther RemarksReference
γ-Al2O3Commercial<50Langmuir-The adsorption capacities of the initial concentrations of 100, 500, and 1000 mg/L were 8.8, 44.6, and 68.0 mg/g.The absorption of γ-Al2O3 by asphaltenes was spontaneous and exothermic.[116]
Al2O3Aladdin Reagents Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China)<50Consistent with the description of type III isotherms with low adsorbate–adsorbent affinity205.7The adsorption capacities of the initial concentrations of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/L were 2965, 6368, and 7857 (mg/m2), respectively. [87]
27 ± 1Langmuir156Qm (mg/m2) values for Al2O3 at 410, 550, 700 K, and TGA were 1.4,
1.8, 2.4, and 1.7, respectively.
The shape of Al2O3 was a rod.[117]
Alumina Nano-alumina: 48 ± 3 nm, micro-alumina: <200 μmLangmuir (nano), Freundlich (micro)Nano-alumina: 39, micro-alumina: 156Qmax (mg/m2): nano-alumina (1.73) > nicro-alumina (0.448).The surface acidities of micro-alumina and nano-alumina were equivalent.[77]
Fe3O4Commercial22 ± 1.5Langmuir43The adsorption capacities of VBASP6, VBASP7, VBASP8, and VBASP9 were 0.047, 0.048, 0.085, and 0.197 mmol/g, respectively.The adsorption rate increased with the decrease in the molecular weight of asphaltene.[74]
21 ± 2Langmuir43Qm values (mg/m2) for Fe3O4
at 410, 550, 700 K, and TGA were 1.7, 2.2, 2.9, and 2.1, respectively.
[117]
20–30Langmuir43Qm (mg/m2): Fe3O4 (1.7). [118]
Fe2O3In situ prepared Fe2O3, commercial Fe2O3Average diameter in nm:
In situ prepared Fe2O3: 35 ± 5,
commercial Fe2O3: 20–30
-Geometrical surface area for in situ prepared Fe2O3: 25 m2/gQm values for in situ prepared Fe2O3 and commercial Fe2O3 were 2.6
and 0.9 g asphaltenes/g NPs, respectively.
In situ NPs adsorbed more asphaltene and had more selectivity for asphaltene.[119]
29 ± 4Langmuir37Qm values (mg/m2) for Fe2O3
at 410, 550, 700 K, and TGA were 1.7, 2.1, 2.7, and 2.6, respectively.
[117]
NiO/SAPO-5
composite
Prepared by the sol–gel method27.5 ± 7.5Langmuir at high temperatures of 342 and 353 K, Freundlich at low temperatures of 298 and 328 K304Qm values at 298, 325, 342, and 353 K were 111.11, 109.42,
104.53, and 91.74 mg/g, respectively.
-[92]
NiO/ZSM-5
nanocomposite
Prepared by the sol–gel method-Langmuir at high temperatures of 342 and 353 K, Freundlich at low temperatures of 298 and 325 K348Qm values at 298, 325, 342, and 353 K were 117.65, 113.64,
111.28, and 100.00 mg/g, respectively.
[93]
Fe3O4/SiO2;
Fe3O4/TiO2;
Fe3O4/Chitosan
Mean particle size in nm:
Fe3O4/SiO2: 30,
Fe3O4/TiO2: 40,
Fe3O4/chitosan: 40
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) Qm values for Fe3O4/SiO2, Fe3O4/TiO2, and Fe3O4/
chitosan were 76.50, 74.22, and 100.12 mg/g,
respectively.
Nanocomposites could better adsorb asphaltene and stabilize water in oil emulsions.[97]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.; Yan, C.; Cai, J.; Pan, Y.; Han, Q. Research Progress in Nanoparticle Inhibitors for Crude Oil Asphaltene Deposition. Molecules 2024, 29, 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051135

AMA Style

Yang S, Yan C, Cai J, Pan Y, Han Q. Research Progress in Nanoparticle Inhibitors for Crude Oil Asphaltene Deposition. Molecules. 2024; 29(5):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Shuangchun, Chenhui Yan, Jiatie Cai, Yi Pan, and Qiuju Han. 2024. "Research Progress in Nanoparticle Inhibitors for Crude Oil Asphaltene Deposition" Molecules 29, no. 5: 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051135

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop