Next Article in Journal
Non-Invasive Detection of Biomolecular Abundance from Fermentative Microorganisms via Raman Spectra Combined with Target Extraction and Multimodel Fitting
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction of High Value Products from Zingiber officinale Roscoe (Ginger) and Utilization of Residual Biomass
Previous Article in Journal
From Visible to Near–Infrared Light–Triggered Photochromism: Negative Photochromism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Challenges and Opportunities in the Catalytic Synthesis of Diphenolic Acid and Evaluation of Its Application Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Transformation of Two Algal Species of Different Genera to High-Value Chemicals and Bioproducts

by
Flora V. Tsvetanova
1,
Stanislava S. Boyadzhieva
1,
Jose A. Paixão Coelho
2,3,*,
Dragomir S. Yankov
1 and
Roumiana P. Stateva
1,*
1
Institute of Chemical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Rua Conselheiro Emídio Navarro 1, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Centro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. RoviscoPais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(1), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010156
Submission received: 15 November 2023 / Revised: 21 December 2023 / Accepted: 23 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023

Abstract

:
This study investigates the potential of two algae species from different genera, namely the recently isolated Scenedesmus obliquus BGP and Porphyridium cruentum, from the perspective of their integral sustainable transformation to valuable substances. Conventional Soxhlet and environmentally friendly supercritical fluid extraction were applied to recover oils from the species. The extracts were characterized through analytical techniques, such as GC-Fid and LC-MS/MS, which allowed their qualitative and quantitative differentiation. Thus, P. cruentum oils contained up to 43% C20:4 and C20:5 fatty acids, while those of S. obliquus BGP had only residual amounts. The LC-MS/MS analysis of phenolic compounds in the S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum extracts showed higher content of 3-OH-4-methoxybenzoic acid and kaempferol 3-O-glycoside in the former and higher amounts of ferulic acid in the latter. Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of the oils were also determined and compared. The compositional analysis of the oil extracts revealed significant differences and varying potentialities based on their genera and method of extraction. To the best of our knowledge our work is unique in providing such detailed information about the transformation prospects of the two algae species to high-value chemicals and bioproducts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microalgae, as a biological resource, have drawn considerable interest in the last years, particularly since they were granted the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status. Consequently, an avenue for using them as sustainable and appealing green factories for valuable compounds of nutritional and health benefits was widely opened. Moreover, unlike any other crop, they are known to have the lowest carbon, water, and arable footprint. Still, compared with other organisms, microalgae are not that well examined and studied, since just a few among the tens of thousands of microalgae species that exist worldwide have been described [1].
In compliance with the concept of circular economy, the development of effective and efficient biorefineries capable of producing ultra-low-footprint and high-value biochemicals from sustainable sources is essential. A biorefinery integrates various processes to transform biomass to high-added-value energy and non-energy-related compounds. Microalgal biomass is an underutilized resource with enormous commercial potential, as compared to terrestrial plants, due to their abundance.
The beneficial biomolecules accumulated by microalgae are widely applicable in different industrial fields such as nutritional, pharmaceutical, medicinal, cosmetic, etc. Among the most widely exploited in industry microalgae are the red ones, especially from the Porphyridium genus. They are known to produce several classes of essential compounds like long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), exopolysaccharides, pigments, antioxidants, and various microelements. PUFAs contain low cholesterol levels and are important substances, especially for human well-being, as they contribute to cardiovascular, eye, and brain maintenance. For example, Porphyridium spp. are reported to synthesize omega 3 eicosapentaenoic (EPA, 20:5), docosahexaenoic (DHA, 22:6), and omega 6 arachidonic (ARA, 20:4) acids, which the human body is incapable of producing [1,2].
The recovery of valuable bioactives from microalgae by applying conventional and non-conventional methods has been a topic of extensive research in the past years. The methods examined include traditional extraction with an organic solvent (solid–liquid, Soxhlet, maceration), ultrasound, and microwave assisted extractions, as well as extractions applying compressed fluids, e.g., supercritical CO2 (scCO2) neat or with a co-solvent, as well as pressurized liquid extraction, etc. Details are published in a number of review articles, for example, [3,4], as well as research papers [2,5,6].
The main aim of our investigation was to compare two algal species of different genera from the perspective of their sustainable transformation to high-value substances with potential applications in the food, nutra-, pharmaceutical, energy, etc., industries.
As model targets, representatives of the genus Scenedesmus (green algae) and the genus Porphyridium (red algae) were chosen.
The selection of the two genera was motivated and substantiated since:
-
Scenedesmus species are freshwater algae, which exhibit high growth rates, multiply quickly, adapt easily to changing conditions, and hence are suitable for semi-industrial and industrial cultivation. These algae are high in nutrition and synthesize biologically active substances such as carotenoids, chlorophylls, mycosporin-like amino acids, and polyphenols, with antioxidant and antiviral potential.
-
The algae of the genus Porphyridium are representatives of a totally different group of marine deep-sea algae, which are characterized by a pigment composition different from that of green algae. Furthermore, they are rich sources of unique polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenes, phycobiliproteins, amino acids, and minerals such as Ca, Mg, Zn, and K [7].
-
These genera are interesting and challenging in their own right and provide examples of the generic issues to be faced when realizing any one-feed/multi-product biorefinery targeting the sustainable transformation of a biomass to valuables and bioactives with applications in various industries.
As representatives of the two genera, the green algae Scenedesmus obliquus BGP, a recently isolated Bulgarian strain, and the red algae Porphyridium cruentum were chosen.
Application of traditional techniques for recovering valuable compounds from S. obliquus BGP has been very limited, resulting in insufficient data. To gain insights into their performance potential for obtaining bioactives, secondary metabolites, and other important compounds sustainably, it is crucial to use advanced environmentally friendly techniques like supercritical fluid extraction, the efficiency and viability of which can be compared to traditional methods such as Soxhlet. Thus, new opportunities for obtaining high-quality extracts rich in valuable compounds from S. obliquus BGP will be uncovered.
Since the extraction method specificity (including types of solvents/co-solvents applied, etc.) is among the most important factors, the impact of the techniques employed on the yield and on the composition of selected oils was analyzed.
Thus, the comparison was based on essential indicators such as: (i) fatty acid composition from FAME GC-FID, (ii) identification and quantification of antioxidants by LC-MS/MS, (iii) total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity (AA), and (iv) several additional parameters and indices. The new data and information obtained allow us to reveal the two strains’ importance and potential for sustainable utilization in the food, food supplements, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, energy, etc., industries.
To the best of our knowledge, no such detailed comparison of strains belonging to different genera, neither in terms of depth nor extent, as presented by us, has been published before.

2. Results and Discussion

This section starts with a brief comparison of the biochemical composition of the two species with data from the literature. Then, the efficiencies of the conventional Soxhlet and extractions with supercritical CO2 (scCO2), both neat and with a co-solvent, are compared based on yield. The influence of operating conditions (solvents, temperature, and pressure) is discussed as well. Subsequently, the chemical composition, total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (AA) of certain extracts are presented.
  • Biochemical composition
Our previous results [8] demonstrated that the recently identified S. obliquus BGP synthesizes considerable amounts of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. In particular, with regard to the latter, the strain is one of the top lipid producers among the Scenedesmus genus species reported in the literature. Other authors have also analyzed the biochemical composition of S. obliquus. For example, in [9], the protein, lipids, and carbohydrates percent reported were 52.00, 9.70, and 7.90%, respectively, while the data of Silva et al. [10] showed that they were 37.15, 10.29, 21.93% and for the three biochemical groups. In another work [11], comparing the composition of S. obliquus with Selenastrum bibraianum the former was proved to have the highest lipid (42.6 ± 0.01%) and carbohydrate content (27.7 ± 0.02%) when cultured in Bristol media under control conditions.
Regarding P. cruentum, in their recent contribution, Ardiles et al. [12] compared the strain biochemical composition, determined by them, with the data of [13,14]. For example, the lipids content has been reported in wide ranges: 14.67 ± 0.24 (%, w/w) [12], 9–14 (% w/w) [13], and 5.3 ± 0.3 (% w/w) [14].
The qualitative deviations between the biochemical composition of P. cruentum and S. obliquus BGP determined by us and those shown in the literature are considerable in some cases. Still, it should be underlined that the amounts of the chemical species identified depend greatly not only on the cultivation conditions but also the strain. For example, it has been demonstrated that Scenedesmus spp. can accumulate lipids in the range of 15–40% of their dry matter [3]. However, when high stress levels are inflicted during cultivation, microalgae can accumulate lipids as high as 70–90% of their dry matter.

2.1. Extraction Yield

2.1.1. Soxhlet Extractions

The extraction yields achieved by one- and two-step Soxhlet extraction are given in Table 1. Considering the results of the compositional analysis of P. cruentum, which showed a low content of lipids, the low yield of the first step Soxhlet with n-hexane was expected (Table 1). On the other end is the yield achieved by the second-step Soxhlet with ethanol performed on the P. cruentum residual matrix, which was over 1.7-times higher than the respective one for the S. obliquus BGP.
Those results are not surprising since, as discussed in [15], the impact of solvent and extraction methods on the various lipidic classes recovery is considerable.
Considering that freshwater algae such as S. obliquus are generally rich in neutral and medium-chain PUFAs, like C16 and C18, while marine algae are rich in long-chain polar PUFAs (e.g., C20 and C22), the higher yield obtained from the second step Soxhlet of P. cruentum is due to the use of polar GRAS solvent ethanol, which enhances the recovery of polar PUFAs.

2.1.2. Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE)

SFE, as an advanced green technique, is widely applied to recover valuables from microalgae. For example, Tzima et al. [4], in their extensive and in-depth review, analyzed over 100 articles reporting SFE of carotenoids, chlorophylls, tocopherols, lipids, and fatty acids from microalgae, with a special section devoted to the genera Scenedesmus and certain S. obliquus species.
In another recent paper, the efficiencies of conventional, microwave-assisted, and SFE to recover bioactives from S. obliquus were compared [9], and it was shown that the results for the solid/liquid and microwave-assisted extractions were comparable, while in the SFE extraction, the lowest yield of bioactives was achieved. On the other hand, the SFE resulted in increased carotenoid content and enhanced antioxidant activity. Gilbert-Lopez et al. [16] examined the SFE by neat CO2 of S. obliquus, while Guedes et al. [17] investigated the influence of pressure, temperature, CO2 flow rate, and a polar co-solvent on the yields of carotenoids and chlorophylls in the SFE of a wild strain of S. obliquus. As reported in [18], the SFE extracts were rich in tricylglycerides but with low carotenoids and chlorophyll content in comparison with the gas-expanded liquid extraction [16].
With regard to P. cruentum recovery of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and total carotenoids from that strain by scCO2 and subcritical n-butane was explored by Feller et al. [19]. Ardiles et al. [12] applied conventional methods like maceration and freeze/thaw, as well as microwave and ultrasound, for the recovery of phycoerythrin (PE) from P. cruentum and P. purpureum. Gallego et al. [5] advocated a green downstream approach to the valorization of P. cruentum biomass, applying pressurized liquids.
The yield of S. obliquus BGP achieved in our study applying neat scCO2, as a function of temperature and pressure, is plotted vs. the extraction time and is displayed in Figure 1.
In all cases studied, the yield was low and varied in the range of 1.12–1.96%. For both pressures applied, the negative influence of temperature was clearly demonstrated—lowest yields were registered at the highest temperature applied of 60 °C. The highest yield with neat scCO2 was obtained at 40 °C and 400 bar.
Our results compare reasonably well with the results of Georgiopoulou et al. [9] who performed SFE of S. obliquus at T = (40, 50, 60) °C and p = (110; 250) bar and achieved a yield with neat scCO2 in the range of 0.98–4.20%, as well with those of [16], where the temperatures applied are analogous to ours but the pressures were varied in the range p = (100; 250; 400) bar. The highest yield obtained was 1.15% at T = 40 °C and p = 400 bar.
SFE with neat scCO2 of P. cruentum was not performed since the strain showed a low content of lipids, which was confirmed by the very low yield of the first-step Soxhlet with n-hexane achieved (Table 1).
Next, the influence of 10% ethanol as a co-solvent on the extraction yield was studied for both species. Based on the results obtained for S. obliquus BGP with neat scCO2, the operating parameters chosen were p = 400 bar and T = (40, 60) °C, respectively.
In the case of S. obliquus BGP, the yield was increased considerably, and the influence of temperature exhibited a trend opposite to that displayed in the case of neat scCO2. Thus, the highest yield (12.29%) was achieved at 60 °C. However, it was about two-times lower than one-step Soxhlet ethanol extraction. At 40 °C, the yield was lower but commensurable with that at 60 °C (10.33%). Georgiopoulou et al. also used 10% ethanol as a cosolvent at 60 °C and 250 bar and reported a yield of 9.75% [9]. The cumulative experimental kinetic extraction curves plotted vs. the extraction time for S. obliquus are displayed in Figure 2.
For P. cruentum, the influence of pressure was first studied at 40 °C, with 10% co-solvent ethanol and a scCO2 flow rate of 1 L/min. As shown (Figure 3), the highest yield registered was 1.93% at p = 400 bar, while the lowest was 1.04% at the highest pressure applied. Our initial expectations that the presence of the co-solvent would increase yields to values, if not commensurable then at least not that lower than the Soxhlet ethanol extraction, were not fulfilled. The reasons behind that assumption were that since the strain cellular walls were not as thick as those of S. obliquus BGP, the application of relatively high pressures and a co-solvent enhanced the mass transfer, which resulted in higher yield values. Still, the highest yield attained was almost 20-times lower than the one-step Soxhlet ethanol extraction. Gallego et al. [5] used pressurized ethanol (105 bars) at a wide range of temperatures (from 50 to 150 °C) and 20 min extraction time and reported increasing yields with increasing temperature—from 3.12 to 11.36%.
Though a direct comparison with our results cannot be made, the maximum yield registered by us at 10% ethanol is commensurable with the lowest value at 50 °C reported by Gallego et al. [5].
Then, the influence of temperature at 400 bar was examined. Two temperatures were applied, T = 40 and 60 °C, respectively, at a 1 L/min scCO2 flow rate. The trend was clear-cut—the higher temperature had a negative effect on the yield, as shown in Figure 4. Also, as demonstrated, the two-times-lower scCO2 flow rate at 40 °C and 400 bar rendered a lower yield (1.33% vs. 1.96%) and required a longer time to achieve it.

2.2. Extracts Quali- and Quantification

2.2.1. GC-FID

Microalgae produce saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. Saturated fatty acids can be bio-transformed to biofuels, while unsaturated fatty acids are used in food, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, etc. Since non-polar solvents (e.g., n-hexane) are best for the extraction of neutral saponifiable lipids, while polar solvents like ethanol perform better in the recovery of more polar lipids, two-step Soxhlet procedure was applied. In the first step, mainly neutral lipids extracted by n-hexane should be recovered and identified in the oils, while ethanol in the second step should extract the polar lipids from the residual biomass. Still, it should be underlined that in microalgal cells, the two types of lipids are not completely isolated, and in many cases, the application of polar solvents leads to the joint extraction of neutral and polar lipids.
The GC-FID results of the S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils recovered by the two-step Soxhlet are displayed in Table 2. The results from the Soxhlet ethanol extractions showed a higher relative percentage of saturated (SFAs) and a lower percentage of unsaturated (mono-, di- and polyunsaturated—MUFAs, DUFAs, PUFAs) fatty acids in the red microalgae when compared to the green one (Table 2). Palmitic acid (C16:0) was dominant in the SFA percentage, both for the green and red strains.
For the three S. obliquus BGP oils analyzed, the percentages of SFAs, and ∑ MUFA + DUFA + PUFA did not differ substantially, while for P. cruentum, the lowest relative percentage of SFA (respectively, the highest ∑ MUFA + DUFA + PUFA) was detected in the oil recovered by the first-step Soxhlet n-hexane. Soxhlet with ethanol and second-step Soxhlet for that strain produced more or less commensurable percentages.
A more comprehensive examination of the results shows that the contribution of the MUFA, DUFA, and PUFA in the sum of unsaturated fatty acids was completely different for both strains. For example, the percentage of the nonpolar oleic acid (C18:1 ω9) was the highest contributor to the MUFAs % of S. obliquus. The highest relative percent was achieved by Soxhlet n-hexane, which was over nine-times higher than that of the corresponding P. cruentum oil recovered. Consequently, the MUFAs percentage in the S. obliquus oils was almost eight-times higher than that detected in the P. cruentum. On the other end is the PUFAs percentage —for P. cruentum, they were the dominant ones—almost three-times higher than the corresponding ones for S. obliquus.
Another interesting detail is that oils of both strains were relatively rich in linoleic acid (LA, C18:2 ω6) with commensurable relative percents in the range of 13.5–15.2%, with the Soxhlet n-hexane P. cruentum oil being the only exception, for which about 21% of LA was detected. The percentages of γ-linolenic acid (GLA C18:3 ω6) in all extracts of both strains were quite low, while for alpha linoleic acid (ALA C18:3 ω3), the trend was different—its relative percentages in all S. obliquus BGP extracts examined, though not very high, were still from 19 to 33 times higher than the corresponding ones in P. cruentum oils.
It is well known that the genus Porphyridium synthesizes the nutritionally important PUFAs eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5 ω-3) and arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4 ω-6), the quantities of which, in certain strains, can comprise more than 40% of the total fatty acids.
In the extracts of the particular P. cruentum strain we studied, the highest percentages of AA were registered in the oils recovered by the first and second steps of Soxhlet (with n-hexane and ethanol, respectively). It should be noted that the AA percentage identified in the first-step Soxhlet was the second highest in all oils examined, being lower only than the percentage of the C16:0 obtained by Soxhlet ethanol. The relative percentages of EPA were over two-times lower than those of AA. Neither PUFAs were detected in the S. obliquus BGP oils.
As known, LA is an essential fatty acid that is not synthesized in the human body and should be provided by food. Its importance is further increased by the fact that humans can synthesize AA from LA. In this sense, both S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum can be used as a sustainable source of LA. In addition, AA is important for human cell functioning since its metabolic breakdown leads to an enhanced production of prostaglandin E2, a hormone-like substance which takes part in a variety of bodily functions [17].
Hence, the ability of P. cruentum to synthesize AA and EPA (the first in high amounts) defines the strain as a promising alternative to oils from fish and land-based plant sources, since both acids are used to enrich functional foods.
The S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils recovered by scCO2 + 10% ethanol as a co-solvent performed at the operating conditions for which the maximum yield was achieved were also analyzed by GC-FID, and the results obtained are displayed in Table 3.
The P. cruentum oil obtained by scCO2 + ethanol again showed higher relative percentage of SFAs when compared to the S. oblicuus one, with C16:0 being the major contributor.
In complete analogy to the Soxhlet extracted oils, the percentage of oleic acid was the highest contributor to the MUFAs percentage of S. obliquus. As should be expected, its percentage was commensurable only with that detected in the second-step Soxhlet + ethanol but considerably lower than the first-step Soxhlet, and again over nine-times higher than that of the corresponding P. cruentum oil recovered.
With regard to the important AA and EPA, the relative percentage of the first was lower than that registered by Soxhlet ethanol, while the second was higher. Again, in the S. obliquus BGP oils, those acids were not detected. Yet one additional interesting result was that while the PUFAs percentage of P. cruentum oils was within the percentages achieved by Soxhlet, for the S. obliquus, an almost twice higher percentage of PUFAs was achieved when compared to the Soxhlet (see Table 2 and Table 3, respectively). Concerning DUFA, their percentages were comparable for both species.
Table 2 and Table 3 also show the PUFA: SFA ratios. It should be noted that the DUFAs C18:2 and C20:2 were taken into consideration when calculating those ratios since linolenic acid is an important essential acid, while eicosadienoic acid, though rare, is known to modulate the metabolism of other PUFAs.
It is hypothesized that all PUFAs in the diet can depress low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lower serum cholesterol levels, whereas all SFAs contribute to high levels of the latter. The results of a recent clinical study confirm the positive influence of PUFAs on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and total cholesterol—the levels of the former were increased, while those of the latter decreased [20].
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported the guidelines for a “balanced diet”, in which the suggested ratio of PUFA: SFA is above 0.4 [21]. WHO also recommends that the proportions of SFA, MUFA, and PUFA in dietary fats should be 1:1.5:1 [22] in order to avoid the risk of developing cardiovascular and other chronic diseases.
The proportions calculated for S. obliquus BGP oil recovered by scCO2 + ethanol were 21.6:33.0:33.3 (1:1.53:1.54), while for P. cruentum, they were 31.7:5.3:63.0 (1:0.17:1.99), resepctively.
Though none of the above comply with the WHO recommendations still the proportions of S. obliquus BGP are better..
Table 2 shows that the PUFA: SFA values of S. obliquus BGP oils were generally lower (up to about 2.5 times) than the corresponding ones of the red microalgae. For the latter, the highest PUFA: SFA ratio was registered in the oil recovered by the first step Soxhlet n-hexane—almost twice as that of Soxhlet ethanol. The influence of the extraction techniques on the PUFA: SFA ratios is clearly demonstrated when the data displayed in Table 2 and Table 3 are compared. Thus, the PUFA: SFA of the S. obliquus oil (Table 3) was over 1.5-times higher than those of the Soxhlet extractions (1.54 vs. 1.03; 1.02; 1.04). Obviously, the latter enhanced the recovery of SFAs, while the SFE enhanced that of PUFAs. The trend observed for P. cruentum was similar when the PUFA: SFA ratio of the SFE oil was compared to that of the Soxhlet ethanol and second-step ethanol (1.99 vs. 1.36; 1.71) but was lower than the Soxhlet n-hexane. Other important indices for the characterization of algal oils were calculated and are presented in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively.
For example, the oxidizability, allylic position equivalent, and bis-allylic position equivalent indices (OX, APE, and BAPE) allow the calculation of the oxidation stability index (OSI). The rate of oxidation of fatty acids of oils/biodiesel depends on the number of double bonds per mole and their relative positions.
The corresponding indices for the oils recoverd from both strains were calculated according to [23,24,25] and are shown in Table 4 and Table 5.
OX = ( 0.02 × C 18 : 1 + C 18 : 2 + 2 × C 18 : 3 ) / 100
APE = ( 2 × C 18 : 1 + C 18 : 2 + C 18 : 3 ) / 100
BAPE = ( C 18 : 2 + 2 × C 18 : 3 ) / 100
OSI = 3.91 0.045 × BAPE
A high OSI value of an oil indicates that it is stable and can be used for the production of biodiesel without the addition of any antioxidants to enhance the stability during the OSI period, up to which the oil/biodiesel quality would remain unchanged, and the biodiesel must be entirely utilized for engine operation. Following the ASTM standard, oils can be classified as best, moderate, and poor. The best oils are characterized with an OSI ≥ 3 h since they are considered relatively more stable and do not require the addition of antioxidants for stabilization, i.e., their biodiesel is expected to be entirely utilized before OSI expires and degradation begins.
According to Kumar and Sharma who compared the above indices for different microalgal oils, the best-performing oil was the S. oblicuus oil (OSI = 3.87), while the OSI indices of other two non-identified Scenedesmus species varied from 1.93 to 2.13 [26].
As demonstrated in Table 4 and Table 5, S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils belonged to the group of best oils since their OSI values were in the range of 3.89–3.9, regardless of the technique employed to recover them.
Table 4 and Table 5 also show the indices of unsaturation (UI), which reflect the proportion of FAs with different degrees of unsaturation in the total FA composition of a species. Consequently, unlike the PUFA: SFA ratio, which reflects the impact of highly unsaturated FAs, UI highlights the influence of acids with a low degree of unsaturation like MUFAs and DUFAs. In view of this, UI is usually applied to characterize the composition of macroalgal FAs and used as a reference whether the respective macroalgae may be used as alternative sources of high-quality PUFA instead of fish or fish oil.
UI was calculated according to [25]:
UI = 1 × (% monoenoics) + 2 × (% dienoics) + 3 × (% trienoics)
      + 4 × (% tetraenoics) +5 × (% pentaenoics) + 6 × (% hexaenoics)
As discussed by Chen and Liu [27], the UI value of seaweeds varies widely—from 45 to 368.68. Colombo et al. [28] used the UI to compare macroalgae caught in the cold waters of Canada with species from the temperate waters of South China. They showed that the UI values of the warm water aglae were in the range from 54 to 151, while for the Canadian algae, the UI varied in the range from 174 to 245, respectively [28]. Our results corroborate those findings as the oils of the deep sea species P. cruentum recovered, regardless of the techniques applied, had much higher UI indices when compared to those of S. obliquus BGP.
Another important index is the Σ hypercholesterolemic fatty acids/Σ hypercholesterolemic fatty acids ratio (h/H), which is related to cholesterol metabolism. Nutritionally, higher h/H values are considered more beneficial for human health. Chen and Liu [27] mentioned in their recent review that initially the h/H index was introduced by Santos-Silva et al. [29] to assess the effect of fatty acids composition of lamb meat on cholesterol, and they pointed out that compared with the PUFA:SFA, the h/H ratio might better reflect that effect on cardiovascular disease [27].
Later, since there was no C12:0 detected in the lamb meat, in order to characterize the relationship between hypocholesterolemic fatty acid (cis-C18:1 and PUFA) and hypercholesterolemic fatty acid [27], the originally proposed formula was extended as follows:
h/H = (cis-C18:1 + ΣPUFA)/(C12:0 + C14:0 + C16:0)
In the present study, we applied the formula advocated by Fernandez et al. [30]:
h/H = [(Σ (C18:1 n-9, C18:1 n-7, C18:2 n-6, C18:3 n-6, C18:3 n-3, C20:3 n-6, C20:4 n-6, C20:5 n-3, C22:4 n-6, C22:5 n-3 and C22:6 n-3)/Σ (C14:0 and C16:0)
The results obtained are presented in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively.
The highest h/H was calculated for the S. obliquus BGP oil recovered by n-hexane in the first step of the two-step Soxhlet. The value was higher but still commensurable with the analogous oil extract of P. cruentum (3.24 vs. 3.03). Obviously, the over nine-times-higher quantity of C18:1 (n-9) and over 30-times-higher quantity of C18:3 (n-3) in the S. obliquus BGP outperformed the C20:4 present in a substantial amount in the P. cruentum but was not detected in the S. obliquus BGP at all.
The h/H values of the oil extracts of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum recovered by scCO2 + 10% ethanol were 3.22 and 2.21, respectively. The S. obliquus BGP h/H index was slightly lower than that of the n-hexane Soxhlet extraction, while for the P. cruentum, the value was decreased more substantially, owing to the higher content of SFA (C16:0) and the lower level of MUFA (C18:1 (n-9)) and DUFA (C18:2 (n-6)) in the SFE extracts.
It should be noted that, as reported by Chen and Liu [27], one of the highest h/H indices was calculated for Camelina sativa oil (11.2–15.0). For red seaweed, h/H was 4.22; for shellfish, it ranged between 1.9 and 4.75, except for Loxechinus albus, for which h/H = 0.21, a value lower than those of the other species. That could be a result of the fact that the main food source of Loxechinus albus is algae. For fish, the h/H is in the range from 0.87 to about 4.83, etc.
Hence, in order to perform a correct comparison of the h/H values, the method advocated in [27] was applied, and the new values calculated for S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils are displayed in Table 6. In all cases examined, the h/H indices of both microalgal species oils were higher than or in the worst case commensurable with the range of h/H indices calculated for the various fish species. The influence of the extraction technique applied was clearly demonstrated for both species—the highest h/H indices were calculated for oils recovered by scCO2 + ethanol, with the S. obliquus BGP oil being the best performer.
As noted above, a reliable comparison with analogous species was difficult as different authors have used different variants of the h/H formula. Moreover, it is not always clearly stated how the oil was recovered (method, solvents, etc.). Thus, in order to compare our data with the results presented in the seminal paper by Matos et al. [14], the h/H of the P. cruentum extracts obtained by the different techniques were yet once again recalculated applying the method used in the reference.
The following values for h/H were obtained: 1.38, 2.88, 1.73, and 2.1, respectively, where the order of techniques followed that of Table 4, with the scCO2 + ethanol extraction being the last in the row. Matos et al. [14] used the Soxhlet extraction method with petroleum ether applied after acid digestion with 4.0 N HCl for 6 h, and the h/H index for P. cruentum was calculated to be 1.9. Our h/H values were of the same order of magnitude, e.g., the oil recovered by the first step Soxhlet n-hexane had the best nutritional quality index equal to 2.88, followed closely by that obtained by scCO2 + 10% ethanol at 40 °C and 400 bar with h/H = 2.1.
Finally, Table 4 and Table 5 also display the index of atherogenicity (IA), which characterizes the atherogenic potential of fatty acids. As discussed in [27], IA is a more adequate indicator when compared to the PUFA/SFA ratio, which is too general and unsuitable for assessing the atherogenicity of food products. The lowest IA = 0.25 was calculated for the S. obliquus oil recovered by scCO2 + 10% ethanol, which was lower than the IA indices of the majority of red and brown seaweeds examined. At the same time, it was either commensurable or slightly higher than those of the majority of the green seaweeds reported in the review.
The only exception being Ulva sp., for which an IA = 0.08 was calculated. With regard to P. cruentum, the IA lowest value = 0.33 was calculated for the oil recovered by Soxhlet n-hexane, while for the oil obtained by scCO2 + 10% ethanol, IA = 0.46, which, though lower, is still commensurable with the IA value reported for P. cruentum oil in [14].

2.2.2. Analysis and Quantification of Antioxidants

A knowledge of the oils’ composition regarding the presence of phenolics was obtained from the LC-MS/MS analyses of the extracts. The results are shown in Table 7.
The presence of constituents of some important groups of antioxidants was tested, namely hydroxycinnamic, caffeoylquinic, and hydroxybenzoic acids, as well as representatives of four subgroups of flavonoids. The quali- and quantification of the S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum extracts showed that the oils of both species were not very rich in antioxidants. Furthermore, the quantities of the bioactives identified varied sometimes by orders of magnitude, which demonstrates not only the influence of the specific genus but also the impact of the recovery methods, operating conditions, and solvents applied. For example, the quantities of hydroxycinnamic and caffeoylquinic acid derivatives in S. obliquus BGP and in P. cruentum were commensurable, with the exception of ferulic and cinnamic acids, which were more abundant in P. cruentum. With regard to hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives, the picture was different. The highest amount in that group was detected for vanillic acid in the S. obliquus oil recovered by second step Soxhlet, followed by 3-OH-4-methoxybenzoic acid. Actually, the quantity of the former was the highest found in all oil tests. The respective amounts of those acids in P. cruentum were considerably much lower.
With regard to flavonoids, the best repersented among all subgroups was kaempferol-3-O-glycoside. Its amounts in the oils of both species were of similar magnitude, the only exception being the S. obliquus BGP oil recovered by scCO2 + 10% ethanol, the quantity of which was the second highest among all antioxidants detected in the oils of both species examined.

2.2.3. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Antioxidant Activity (AA)

The TPC and AA of the oils of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum are shown in Table 8. TPC is just a quantitative indicator of the total phenols in the oils and does not provide any information about their particular composition. Still, it showed some trends—for example, examining the results for the Soxhlet extractions of S. obliquus BGP, it is clear that the largest amount of polyphenols was extracted in the single-step extraction with ethanol (409.59 μg/mg), followed by scCO2 + 10% ethanol, with the amount in the oil recovered by the second-step Soxhlet being the lowest. This trend was expected since, in general, phenolics are better recovered by polar solvents.
The DPPH free radical scavenging activity for the species exhibited a somewhat different pattern; namely, the highest value was measured for the oil recovered by scCO2 + ethanol. It was, however, commensurable with that for Soxhlet ethanol. The best (lowest) IC50 value = 1.42 was determined for the oil obtained by the second-step Soxhlet. That can be explained, to a certain extent, by the presence in relatively higher amounts of potent antioxidants like vanilic and 3-OH-4-methoxybenzoic acids.
TPC values calculated for the P. cruentum oils were not only lower but the trend of the influence of the extraction methods on the TPC was also different from that for S. obliquus. Thus, the oil obtained by scCO2 with 10% ethanol had the highest TPC. Furthermore, in contrast to S. obliquus, the amount of polyphenols in the oil recovered by the second-step Soxhlet ethanol of the spent matrix was higher than the amount registered in the Soxhlet ethanol. On the other hand, the activity toward the DPPH radical for the species was analogous to the one exhibited by S. obliquus. With regard to IC50, the lowest value was calculated for the Soxhlet ethanol extract. The latter was the best among all IC50 values calculated.
Comparing the TPC of the two species, the data clearly show that oils of S. obliquus were richer in polyphenols. For both species, the SFE oil extracts had the highest scavenging ability against DPPH free radicals.
In [9], the TPC of S. obliquus oil obtained by neat scCO2 and scCO2 + 10% ethanol were reported. However, a direct comparison cannot be made since the operating conditions are not only different (e.g., lower pressures applied) but also the TPC is represented as mgGA/gextr.
The in-depth comprehensive analyses performed on the two species’ oils showed the impact of the techniques’ specificity (operational parameters, nature of solvents, etc.) on their yield and composition. However, the picture of the latter is too complex and reflects not only the effect of the above but also the major influence of the specifics of the strain and the genera, intertwined with other factors like growing conditions, etc., which were not a topic of the present research.
As difficult as it is to generalize our findings, still the following observations and conclusions are valid:
i.
Both S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils are “best oils” and can be used for biodiesel production without any antioxidants.
ii.
P. cruentum oils, regardless of the extraction technique used, can enrich functional foods since they have high levels of PUFAs, which are two- to three-times higher than those found in S. obliquus BGP oils. P. cruentum oil can also serve as a substitute for fish oil because of the high amounts of AA and EPA synthesized.
iii.
S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils have commensurable high values of h/H that are in the upper range of the corresponding indices of shellfish and fish. These oils can be used as additives in human nutrition to prevent cardiovascular disease, particularly for people with high blood pressure.
iv.
S. obliquus BGP oil obtained through scCO2 extraction with 10% ethanol exhibited the lowest IA of 0.25, which is lower than most red and brown seaweeds as reported in [27]. Therefore, it can be considered a suitable additive to foods or products that can help prevent plaque accumulation and reduce levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C or “bad” cholesterol.
v.
TPC and AA analysis of two strains’ oils show the impact of genera and extraction methods. S. obliquus BGP ethanol oil has the highest TPC, over three-times higher than P. cruentum. The lowest IC50 is calculated for P. cruentum ethanol oil—over 4.5-times lower than S. obliquus BGP. The best AA performers are oils from both species obtained by SFE.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Microalgal Strains

Scenedesmus obliquus BGP is a previously not known strain of the genus Scenedesmus. It was newly isolated from a rainwater puddle in Sofia, Bulgaria, at an average temperature of 20 °C. The morphological analysis identified the new strain as Scenedesmus obliquus (Turpin) Kutzing [8], and the strain was subsequently named S. obliquus BGP. A description of the taxonomic and molecular analyses performed was outlined in great detail in a previous contribution by some of the present authors [8] and will not be presented here. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the strain showed tolerance toward the influence of the most important environmental factors such as light intensity, temperature, and composition of the nutrient medium, and the optimum cultivation conditions were determined.
Lyophilized biomasses of both S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum were generously donated to us by the Laboratory of Experimental algology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
The monoalgal, non-axenic cultures of red microalga Porphyridium cruentum (AG.) (Rhodophyta), strain VISCHER 1935/107, acquired by the Laboratory of Experimental algology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences from the culture collection of the Institute of Botany, Třeboň, The Czech Republic, was grown on the modified culture medium as reported in [31].
The lyophilization of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum biomass was performed in a LGA 05 lyophilizer (Janetzki, Leipzig, Germany), as explained in [8], and then stored in dry–dark conditions prior to use.

3.2. Chemicals and Reagents

The chemicals used for the GC–FID analyses were as follows: Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix (CRM47885), reference mixture of fatty acid methyl esters from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), toluene (pure, VWR International, Paris, France), sulfuric acid (98%, MerckKGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), sodium chloride (pure, MerkKGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), potassium bicarbonate (pure, VWR International, Paris, France), chloroform (99.8% VWR International, Paris, France), sodium sulfate (pure, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany), and helium (99.9999%, Air Liquide A/S).
LC MS/MS quantification of polyphenolic compounds used standards enumerated in detail in a previous article [32].
For TPC and antioxidant activity analysis, the following chemicals were used: Folin–Ciocalteu reagent 2 N, sodium carbonate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ATBS, ethanol HPLC grade (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain), gallic acid, Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), potassium persulfate and absolute ethanol (Neon, Suzano, SP, Brazil), and quercetin dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) [32].
The rest of the reagents applied were of the highest purity: methanol ≥ 99.9%, ethanol ≥ 99.8%, and n-hexane ≥ 99% were purchased from Honeywell Riedel-de-Haen (Seelze, Germany); ethyl acetate ≥ 99.5% from JLS-Chemie Handel GmbH (Hannover, Germany); methyl tert-butyl ether ≥ 99.8%, and acetonitrile ≥ 99.9% from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany); and bone dry grade CO2 (99.99% pure; no water, Messer, Sofia, Bulgaria).

3.3. Biochemical Analyses

In our previous contribution [8], the biochemical composition of S. obliquus BGP was analyzed, and the values for proteins (24–45%), lipids (23–30%), and carbohydrates (25–28%) were determined. The biochemical composition of the P. cruentum strain VISCHER 1935/107 was reported in [31] to be: proteins (27–38%), lipids (9–12%), and carbohydrates (40–57%). The protocols of the analyses are presented in detail in [8] and will not be reproduced here.

3.4. Microalgal Extracts Recovery

3.4.1. Preliminary Preparation of the Material

The lyophilized microalgal samples were firstly crushed additionally to a mean particle diameter (dp) of 0.5 mm and then subjected to ultrasonication in an ultrasonic disintegrator UD 20 (Bandeline electronic, Berlin, Germany) with an ultrasonic field of 35 kHz. After each sonication, the sample treated was examined by a microscope to establish the level of cell disintegration. The procedure was explained in detail in our previous work [8].

3.4.2. Soxhlet Extraction

The protocol for performing the Soxhlet extractions was reported in detail in our previous work [32]. In brief, the Soxhlet apparatus used was ISOLAB NS29/32 + 34/35 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). In the one-step Soxhlet, ethanol was used, while in the two-step, extraction with n-hexane was first performed. Subsequently, the residual matrix was subjected to an extraction with ethanol.
In all experiments, the extraction cartridge was filled with 3.0 ± 0.1 g sonicated microalgal biomass (S. obliquus BGP or P. cruentum). The extraction was performed until a complete discoloration of the solvent was observed. The solvent from the liquid extract was evaporated under vacuum using Hei-VAP Rotary Evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GmbH&Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). Next, the resulting dry extract was dried at 60 ± 2.0 °C to a constant weight in an air circulation oven, and the yield was calculated according to:
Y i e l d % = m a s s   o f   e x t r a c t   ( g ) m a s s   o f   s a m p l e   ( g ) × 100
The extracts were placed in glass vials and kept at 4 °C until analysis. Experiments were performed in triplicates and total extraction yield was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The results are presented in Table 1.

3.4.3. Supercritical Fluid Extraction

In our study, S. obliquus BGP was extracted with neat scCO2 at T = (40, 50, and 60) °C and p = (400 and 500) bar. The scCO2 flow rate was 1 L min−1. SCE with a co-solvent ethanol was applied to both strains. The experiments were carried out in a flow apparatus (SFT-110-XW, Supercritical Fluid Technologies Inc., Newark, DE, USA), with two parallel 50 cm3 internal volume extractors made from stainless steel tubing (7 cm long, internal diameter 3.02 cm) and temperature controllers for extraction vessels and restrictor valves, which could be adjusted up to 120 °C. The CO2 pressure was guaranteed by a SFT Nex10 SCF pump actuate from a compressor model HYAC50-25, Hyundai, South Korea, while in experiments with a co-solvent an additional pump (LL-Class, USA) from SFT, Inc., Newark, DE, USA is used. A full description of the equipment is given in [32] and will not be elaborated further here. In all experiments, about 5 g dry sample of the respective species biomass was placed in the processing vessel.

3.5. Characterization and Quantification of the Extracts

The fatty acid composition of certain extracts of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum was determined by GC-FID, the methodology of which was described in detail in [33]. The identification and quantification of the different groups of phenolics by LC-MS/MS was presented exhaustively in its entirety in our earlier works [32].
In addition, the total phenolic content (TPC) of the extracts analyzed was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, while the DPPH assay determined the free radical scavenging activity of the samples. The corresponding methodology of the three methods was presented fully in our previously published contribution [32].

4. Conclusions

Oils of two algae strains belonging to different genera—the recently isolated Bulgarian strain S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum—were extracted using both a conventional method (Soxhlet with hexane and ethanol) and an advanced green technology (scCO2 with and without a co-solvent ethanol). The use of scCO2 results in lower yields compared to Soxhlet extraction, even with the addition of ethanol as a co-solvent, which is consistent with previous findings in the literature.
The quali- and quantitative analysis of the oils through GC-Fid and LC-MS/MS, as well as the determination of parameters and indices that made it possible to outline their viability, demonstrated the higher potential of P. cruentum algae as a sustainable source of bioactive compounds with possible applications in the food and/or pharmaceutical industry when compared to the S. obliquus BGP.
The fatty acid profiles of the oils of the two species differed significantly. In the case of S. obliquus BGP, the percentage of different C18 fatty acids (both saturated and unsaturated) ranged from 56.3% to 64.4%, a percentage much higher than that of P. cruentum, for which those values were between 19.3% and 28.3%. On the other hand, the latter contained up to 43% of C20:4 and C20:5 fatty acids, which were not detected in the S. obliquus BGP. The OSI values calculated for both S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils position them among the best oils for the production of biodiesel.
Analysis of the fatty acids and polyphenols in P. cruentum oil indicates its superior potential for food and pharmaceutical applications compared to the green algae. However, the h/H indices calculated for the oils of both species show that they have the capacity to serve as additives to human nutrition. Hence, the algae of both species exhibit promising properties and could be exploited in the future in a one-feed, multi-product biorefinery with a wide variety of applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.P.C., R.P.S., F.V.T., S.S.B. and D.S.Y.; methodology, R.P.S., F.V.T., S.S.B. and D.S.Y.; validation, R.P.S., J.A.P.C., F.V.T., S.S.B. and D.S.Y.; formal analysis, S.S.B., F.V.T., D.S.Y., J.A.P.C. and R.P.S.; investigation, F.V.T., S.S.B., R.P.S. and D.S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, R.P.S., F.V.T., S.S.B., J.A.P.C. and D.S.Y.; writing—review and editing, R.P.S., J.A.P.C., F.V.T., S.S.B. and D.S.Y.; supervision, R.P.S., J.A.P.C., S.S.B., F.V.T. and D.S.Y.; project administration, D.S.Y., R.P.S., F.V.T., S.S.B. and J.A.P.C.; funding acquisition, D.S.Y., R.P.S., F.V.T., S.S.B. and J.A.P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from The Bulgarian National Science Fund, Grant number KP-06-OPR 04/1, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 778168.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank V. Lozanov and members of “Analysis and Synthesis of Biologically Active Substances” laboratory for their contribution to a part of the analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gaignard, C.; Gargouch, N.; Dubessay, P.; Delattre, C.; Pierre, G.; Laroche, C.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. New horizons in culture and valorization of red microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 193–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mobin, S.; Firoz, A. Some promising microalgal species for commercial applications: A review. Energy Procedia 2017, 110, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koyande, A.; Show, P.; Guo, R.; Tang, B.; Ogino, C.; Chang, J. Bio-processing of algal bio-refinery: A review on current advances and future perspectives. Bioengineered 2019, 10, 574–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tzima, S.; Georgiopoulou, I.; Louli, V.; Magoulas, K. Recent advances in supercritical CO2 extraction of pigments, lipids and bioactive compounds from microalgae. Molecules 2023, 28, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gallego, R.; Martínez, M.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibáñez, E.; Herrero, M. Development of a green downstream process for the valorization of Porphyridium cruentum biomass. Molecules 2019, 24, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, T.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Wu, H.; Wu, H.; Xiang, W. A novel three-step extraction strategy for high-value products from red algae Porphyridium purpureum. Foods 2021, 10, 2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pignolet, O.; Jubeau, S.; Vaca-Garcia, C.; Michaud, P. Highly valuable microalgae: Biochemical and topological aspects. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 781–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vasileva, I.; Boyadzhieva, S.; Kalotova, G.; Ivanova, J.; Kabaivanova, L.; Naydenova, G.; Jordanova, M.; Yankov, D.; Stateva, R. A new Bulgarian strain of Scenedesmus sp.—Identification, growth, biochemical composition, and oil recovery. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 53, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Georgiopoulou, I.; Louli, V.; Magoulas, K. Comparative study of conventional, microwave-assisted and supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds from microalgae: The case of Scenedesmus obliquus. Separations 2023, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silva, M.; Martins, M.; Leite, M.; Miliao, G.; Coimbra, J. Microalga Scenedesmus obliquus: Extraction of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. Rev. Cienc. Agronom. 2021, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khatoon, H.; Rahman, N.; Suleiman, S.; Banerjee, S.; Abol-Munafi, A. Growth and proximate composition of Scenedesmus obliquus and Selenastrum bibraianum cultured in different media and condition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 89, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ardiles, P.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Salinas-Fuentes, F.; Órdenes, D.; Renato, G.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Biochemical Composition and Phycoerythrin Extraction from Red Microalgae: A Comparative Study Using Green Extraction Technologies. Processes 2020, 8, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Becker, E. Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matos, Â.P.; Feller, R.; Moecke, E.H.S.; de Oliveira, J.V.; Junior, A.F.; Derner, R.B.; Sant’Anna, E.S. Chemical characterization of six microalgae with potential utility for food application. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2016, 93, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Callejón, M.; Medina, A.; Sánchez, M.; Moreno, P.; López, E.; Cerdán, L.; Molina-Grima, E. Supercritical fluid extraction and pressurized liquid extraction processes applied to eicosapentaenoic acid-rich polar lipid recovery from the microalga Nannochloropsis sp. Algal Res. 2022, 61, 102586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gilbert-Lopez, B.; Mendiola, J.; Van Den Broek, L.; Houweling-Tan, B.; Sijtsma, L.; Cifuentes, A.; Herrero, M.; Ibáñez, E. Green compressed fluid technologies for downstream processing of Scenedesmus obliquus in a biorefinery approach. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guedes, A.; Giao, M.; Matias, A.; Nunes, A.; Pintado, M.; Duarte, C.; Malcata, F. Supercritical fluid extraction of carotenoids and chlorophylls a, b and c, from a wild strain of Scenedesmus obliquus for use in food processing. J. Food Eng. 2013, 116, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raposo, M.; Morais, A.; Morais, R. Influence of sulphate on the composition and antibacterial and antiviral properties of the exopolysaccharide from Porphyridium cruentum. Life Sci. 2014, 101, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feller, R.; Matos, A.; Mazzutti, S.; Moecke, E.; Tres, M.; Derner, R.; Oliveira, J.; Junior, A. Polyunsaturated ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids, total carotenoids and antioxidant activity of three marine microalgae extracts obtained by supercritical CO2 and subcritical n-butane. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 133, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, D.; Yan, J.; Yang, J.; Sun, J.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F. Effects of different n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ratios on lipid metabolism in patients with hyperlipidemia: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1166702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. WHO. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; pp. 87–88.
  22. Ander, B.; Dupasquier, C.; Prociuk, M.; Pierce, G.; Faha, F. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their effects on cardiovascular disease. Exp. Clin. Cardiol. 2003, 8, 164–172. [Google Scholar]
  23. Grover, S.; Kumari, P.; Kumar, A.; Soni, A.; Sehgal, S.; Sharma, V. Preparation and quality evaluation of different oil blends. Lett. Appl. NanoBioScience 2021, 10, 2126–2137. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pinto, T.I.; Coelho, J.A.; Pires, B.I.; Neng, N.R.; Nogueira, J.M.; Bordado, J.C.; Sardinha, J.P. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, antioxidant activity, and fatty acid composition of bran oil from rice varieties cultivated in Portugal. Separations 2021, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Knothe, G.; Dunn, R.O. Dependence of oil stability index of fatty compounds on their structure and concentration and presence of metals. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2003, 80, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, M.; Sharma, M. Assessment of potential of oils for biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 44, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, J.; Liu, H. Nutritional indices for assessing fatty acids: A mini-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Colombo, M.L.; Giavarini, R.P.F.; De Angelis, L.; Galli, C.; Bolis, C. Marine macroalgae as sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santos-Silva, J.; Bessa, R.; Santos-Silva, F. Effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs: II. Fatty acid composition of meat. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 77, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernández, M.; Ordóñez, J.; Cambero, I.; Santos, C.; Pin, C.; Hoz, L. Fatty acid compositions of selected varieties of Spanish dry ham related to their nutritional implications. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vasileva, I.; Ivanova, J. Biochemical profile of green and red algae–A key for understanding their potential application as food additives. TJS 2019, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boyadzhieva, S.; Coelho, J.A.P.; Errico, M.; Reynel-Avilla, H.E.; Yankov, D.S.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Stateva, R.P. Assessment of Gnaphalium viscosum (Kunth) Valorization Prospects: Sustainable Recovery of Antioxidants by Different Techniques. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Momchilova, S.; Kazakova, A.; Taneva, S.; Aleksieva, K.; Mladenova, R.; Karakirova, Y.; Petkova, Z.; Kamenova-Nacheva, M.; Teneva, D.; Denev, P. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Fat Content, Fatty Acids, Antioxidants and Oxidative Stability of Almonds, and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Study of Treated Nuts. Molecules 2023, 28, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of temperature and pressure on the S. obliquus BGP yield as a function of time.
Figure 1. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of temperature and pressure on the S. obliquus BGP yield as a function of time.
Molecules 29 00156 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of temperature at 400 bar and 10% cosolvent ethanol on the S. obliquus BGP yield, as a function of time.
Figure 2. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of temperature at 400 bar and 10% cosolvent ethanol on the S. obliquus BGP yield, as a function of time.
Molecules 29 00156 g002
Figure 3. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of pressure at 40 °C, 10% cosolvent ethanol, and 1 L/min flow rate on the P. cruentum yield as a function of time.
Figure 3. Cumulative extraction yield curves representing the influence of pressure at 40 °C, 10% cosolvent ethanol, and 1 L/min flow rate on the P. cruentum yield as a function of time.
Molecules 29 00156 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative extraction yield curves show the effect of temperature at 400 bar and 10% ethanol on P. cruentum yield over time, with flow rate variation.
Figure 4. Cumulative extraction yield curves show the effect of temperature at 400 bar and 10% ethanol on P. cruentum yield over time, with flow rate variation.
Molecules 29 00156 g004
Table 1. Influence of the type of Soxhlet method and solvent on the extraction yield of the two algal species.
Table 1. Influence of the type of Soxhlet method and solvent on the extraction yield of the two algal species.
Extraction MethodExtraction ConditionsS. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
SolventTemperature (°C)Extraction Yield (wt %)Extraction Yield (wt %)
Soxhletethanol7823.6 ± 1.126.5 ± 1.15
Two-step Soxhletn-hexane (step 1)
ethanol (step 2)
68
78
11.1 ± 0.5
16.9 ± 0.84
Cumulative yield: 28
2.57 ± 0.14
29.52 ± 1.47
Cumulative yield: 32
Extraction yield expressed in wt % (mean ± standard deviation).
Table 2. Fatty acid composition from FAME GC-FID analysis of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum Soxhlet oil extracts, expressed as relative percent of total fatty acids identified.
Table 2. Fatty acid composition from FAME GC-FID analysis of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum Soxhlet oil extracts, expressed as relative percent of total fatty acids identified.
Fatty AcidsSoxhlet extraction
S. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
96% EtOHFirst Step n-HexaneSecond Step 96% EtOH96% EtOHFirst Step n-HexaneSecond Step 96% EtOH
C12:0traces1.0 ± 0.07tracesnd0.1 ± 0.01nd
C14:00.2 ± 0.010.5 ± 0.030.2 ± 0.010.3 ± 0.020.3 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.01
C15:00.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.010.3 ± 0.030.2 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.02
C16:022.3 ± 0.718.8 ± 0.624.1 ± 0.937.8 ± 0.923.6 ± 0.733.9 ± 0.8
C16:1-isom5.0 ± 0.53.8 ± 0.15.7 ± 0.61.7 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.091.6 ± 0.1
C16:23.1 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.23.6 ± 0.5nd0.2 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.01
C16:33.0 ± 0.42.4 ± 0.23.5 ± 0.4ndndnd
C16:42.4 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.3ndndnd
C17:00.2 ± 0.020.2 ± 0.010.3 ± 0.020.2 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.020.1 ± 0.01
C18:02.7 ± 0.33.2 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.030.6 ± 0.02
C18:1 (n-9)32.8 ± 0.738.7 ± 0.927.6 ± 0.83.5 ± 0.44.5 ± 0.52.5 ± 0.3
C18:1 (n-7)0.7 ± 0.020.6 ± 0.010.8 ± 0.031.3 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.030.7 ± 0.03
C18:2 (n-6)14.3 ± 0.513.5 ± 0.414.8 ± 0.415.2 ± 0.521.2 ± 0.514.9 ± 0.6
C18:3 (n-6)0.8 ± 0.040.6 ± 0.021.0 ± 0.040.2 ± 0.010.5 ± 0.030.3 ± 0.03
C18:3 (n-3)9.5 ± 0.89.1 ± 0.79.9 ± 0.80.5 ± 0.020.3 ± 0.010.3 ± 0.01
C18:41.9 ± 0.11.9 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.2ndndnd
C20:00.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.01ndndnd
C20:10.3 ± 0.010.4 ± 0.030.4 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.01ndnd
C20:2ndndnd2.6 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.5
C20:3-isomndndnd1.9 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.71.5 ± 0.4
C20:4ndndnd23.6 ± 0.834.8 ± 0.931.4 ± 0.9
C20:5ndndnd9.7 ± 0.68.1 ± 0.59.9 ± 0.9
C22:00.2 ± 0.010.6 ± 0.040.3 ± 0.01ndndnd
C22:10.4 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.010.4 ± 0.02ndndnd
SFA25.824.527.339.625.335.0
MUFA39.243.734.96.76.44.8
DUFA17.416.118.417.822.416.8
PUFA17.615.719.435.945.943.4
PUFA:SFA1.031.021.041.362.691.71
nd—not detected.
Table 3. Fatty acid composition from FAME GC-FID analysis of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum scCO2 + ethanol oil extracts, expressed as the relative percent of total fatty acids identified.
Table 3. Fatty acid composition from FAME GC-FID analysis of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum scCO2 + ethanol oil extracts, expressed as the relative percent of total fatty acids identified.
Fatty AcidsS. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
400 Bar, 40 °C, 10% EtOH400 Bar, 40 °C, 10% EtOH
C12:0nd0.7 ± 0.03
C14:00.2 ± 0.010.4 ± 0.01
C15:00.1 ± 0.010.3 ± 0.02
C16:018.6 ± 0.429.0 ± 0.6
C16:1-isom2.9 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.1
C16:22.5 ± 0.1nd
C16:33.7 ± 0.3nd
C16:45.9 ± 0.3nd
C17:00.1 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.01
C18:01.6 ± 0.091.1 ± 0.09
C18:1 (n-9)28.6 ± 0.73.3 ± 0.3
C18:1 (n-7)0.9 ± 0.070.8 ± 0.05
C18:2 (n-6)11.6 ± 0.317.5 ± 0.4
C18:3 (n-6)0.4 ± 0.030.3 ± 0.02
C18:3 (n-3)19.1 ± 0.80.2 ± 0.01
C18:42.2 ± 0.09nd
C20:00.1 ± 0.01nd
C20:10.3 ± 0.01nd
C20:2nd2.1 ± 0.3
C20:3-isomnd2.2 ± 0.3
C20:4nd29.0 ± 0.8
C20:5nd11.7 ± 0.5
C22:00.7 ± 0.03nd
C22:10.3 ± 0.02nd
C24:00.2 ± 0.01nd
SFA21.631.7
MUFA33.05.3
DUFA14.119.6
PUFA31.343.4
PUFA:SFA1.541.99
nd—not detected.
Table 4. Parameters and indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum Soxhlet oil extracts.
Table 4. Parameters and indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum Soxhlet oil extracts.
Oil Parameters and IndicesSoxhlet Extraction
S. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
96% EtOHFirst Step n-HexaneSecond Step 96% EtOH96% EtOHFirst Step n-HexaneSecond Step 96% EtOH
OX0.260.340.370.170.230.16
APE1.161.251.080.410.540.37
BAPE0.350.330.370.170.230.16
OSI3.893.903.893.903.903.90
UI131.1126.6134.9193239.9219.8
h/H2.583.242.231.473.031.8
IA0.310.290.340.650.330.53
Table 5. Parameters and indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils obtained by SCE at 400 bar, 40 °C, and 10% ethanol.
Table 5. Parameters and indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils obtained by SCE at 400 bar, 40 °C, and 10% ethanol.
Oil ParametersS. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
400 Bar, 40 °C, 10% EtOH400 Bar, 40 °C, 10% EtOH
OX0.510.19
APE1.210.45
BAPE0.510.19
OSI3.893.9
UI163.2227.1
h/H3.222.21
IA0.250.46
Table 6. h/H indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils calculated.
Table 6. h/H indices of S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum oils calculated.
SpeciesExtraction Methodh/H = (cis-C18:1 + ΣPUFA)/(C12:0 + C14:0+ C16:0)
S. obliquus BGPSoxhlet 96% ethanol2.27
Soxhlet n-hexane (first-step)2.71
Soxhlet 96% ethanol second step after n-hexane1.96
400 bar, 60 °C, 10% ethanol3.23
P. cruentumSoxhlet 96% ethanol1.07
Soxhlet n-hexane (first-step)2.13
Soxhlet 96% ethanol second step after n-hexane1.37
400 bar, 40 °C, 10% ethanol1.58
Table 7. LC–MS/MS analysis of phenolic compounds in S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum extracts obtained by Soxhlet ethanol and SFE with co-solvent.
Table 7. LC–MS/MS analysis of phenolic compounds in S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum extracts obtained by Soxhlet ethanol and SFE with co-solvent.
Compound IdentifiedS. obliquus BGPP. cruentum
Soxhlet 96% EthanolSoxhlet 96% Ethanol Second Step after n-Hexane400 Bar, 60 °C, 10% EthanolSoxhlet 96%
Ethanol
Soxhlet 96%
Ethanol Second Step after n-Hexane
400 Bar, 40 °C, 10% Ethanol
ng/mg
Phenolic acids
Hydroxycinnamic and caffeoylquinic acid derivatives
o-coumaric acid4.1714.1433.9313.4704.2424.340
p-coumaric acid0.2420.1480.0400.5500.0610.262
m-coumaric acid4.4394.7484.5715.2162.2694.613
ferulic acid0.2210.4580.41217.0302.1641.246
cinnamic acid2.9341.6333.2750.5599.7692.026
3-O-caffeoylquinic (chlorogenic) acid0.0850.4150.3932.2450.7640.546
Hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives
gallic acid0.0140.0720.0460.0260.0410.012
vanillic acid2.880167.17414.911n.d.9.1147.287
ellagic acid3.2060.4710.8390.2810.3940.530
gentisic acid0.2261.7780.5782.5190.0910.093
protocatechinic acid0.6020.4530.1182.2650.1110.192
o-hydroxybenzoic acid4.9645.4334.45910.9133.2545.702
m-hydroxybenzoic acid0.0601.2791.7860.7920.4630.841
syringic acid0.2460.0631.1302.6961.1220.210
3-OH-4-methoxybenzoic acid2.77394.07512.1262.0118.2902.744
Flavonoids
Flavonols
quercetin0.6030.1800.7240.0840.0930.160
myrecitrin0.1230.0120.1260.0160.0450.016
myrecitin0.4830.3560.4350.0410.2660.799
rutin2.7004.5974.9254.0255.8674.559
resveratrol0.1740.2020.2200.2320.1900.091
kaempferol0.6070.1011.9860.1630.0530.120
kaempferol-3-O-glycoside31.06313.78299.50722.8100.97421.391
fisetin0.4820.0660.1050.2040.0150.024
Flavones
luteolin0.6480.1030.1990.1000.0510.105
apigenin0.4430.0490.9100.0810.0390.067
Flavan-3-ols
catechinn.d.0.0660.0420.0520.3980.156
epicatechin0.0520.1180.0430.0593.5900.108
Flavanones
hisperidin0.1230.0120.0030.0030.0010.004
naringenin0.1660.0060.0860.0400.0020.003
Relative standard deviation (RSD) = 2.3%.
Table 8. Total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and IC50 of the extracts obtained from S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum by different extraction techniques.
Table 8. Total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and IC50 of the extracts obtained from S. obliquus BGP and P. cruentum by different extraction techniques.
SpeciesExtraction MethodTPCDPPH
Quercetin
eq. [μg/mg]
Trolox
eq. [mM]
IC50 mg
Extract
S. obliquus BGPSoxhlet 96% ethanol409.59 ± 7.421.812.65
Soxhlet 96% ethanol second step after n-hexane155.85 ± 0.401.581.42
400 bar, 60 °C, 10% ethanol255.73 ± 6.331.983.52
P. cruentumSoxhlet 96% ethanol134.40 ± 0.801.380.31
Soxhlet 96% ethanol second step after n-hexane162.45 ± 3.401.09-
400 bar, 40 °C, 10% ethanol182.09 ± 8.081.892.72
Relative standard deviation (RSD): RSDDPPH = ±3.01%; RSDIC50 = ±1.6%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsvetanova, F.V.; Boyadzhieva, S.S.; Coelho, J.A.P.; Yankov, D.S.; Stateva, R.P. Sustainable Transformation of Two Algal Species of Different Genera to High-Value Chemicals and Bioproducts. Molecules 2024, 29, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010156

AMA Style

Tsvetanova FV, Boyadzhieva SS, Coelho JAP, Yankov DS, Stateva RP. Sustainable Transformation of Two Algal Species of Different Genera to High-Value Chemicals and Bioproducts. Molecules. 2024; 29(1):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsvetanova, Flora V., Stanislava S. Boyadzhieva, Jose A. Paixão Coelho, Dragomir S. Yankov, and Roumiana P. Stateva. 2024. "Sustainable Transformation of Two Algal Species of Different Genera to High-Value Chemicals and Bioproducts" Molecules 29, no. 1: 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010156

APA Style

Tsvetanova, F. V., Boyadzhieva, S. S., Coelho, J. A. P., Yankov, D. S., & Stateva, R. P. (2024). Sustainable Transformation of Two Algal Species of Different Genera to High-Value Chemicals and Bioproducts. Molecules, 29(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010156

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop