Next Article in Journal
Interplay of Anisotropic Exchange Interactions and Single-Ion Anisotropy in Single-Chain Magnets Built from Ru/Os Cyanidometallates(III) and Mn(III) Complex
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Synthesis of Dihydroisoxazoles by p-TsOH-Participated 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Dipolarophiles withα-Nitroketones
Previous Article in Journal
Silymarin Encapsulated Liposomal Formulation: An Effective Treatment Modality against Copper Toxicity Associated Liver Dysfunction and Neurobehavioral Abnormalities in Wistar Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unexpected Decarbonylation of Acylethynylpyrroles under the Action of Cyanomethyl Carbanion: A Robust Access to Ethynylpyrroles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Bifunctional Phase-Transfer Organocatalysts Based on Camphor

1
Chair of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstrasse 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031515
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approaches to Synthetic Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Ten novel bifunctional quaternary ammonium salt phase-transfer organocatalysts were synthesized in four steps from (+)-camphor-derived 1,3-diamines. These quaternary ammonium salts contained either (thio)urea or squaramide hydrogen bond donor groups in combination with either trifluoroacetate or iodide as the counteranion. Their organocatalytic activity was evaluated in electrophilic heterofunctionalizations of β-keto esters and in the Michael addition of a glycine Schiff base with methyl acrylate. α-Fluorination and chlorination of β-keto esters proceeded with full conversion and low enantioselectivities (up to 29% ee). Similarly, the Michael addition of a glycine Schiff base with methyl acrylate proceeded with full conversion and up to 11% ee. The new catalysts have been fully characterized; the stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center was unambiguously determined.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the seminal contributions of Wynberg [1], Dolling [2], and O’Donnell [3] in the 1970s and 1980s, in which chiral quaternary ammonium salts based on Cinchona alkaloids were used as catalysts for enantioselective epoxidations and α-alkylations of prochiral substrates, the use of chiral quaternary ammonium salts as phase-transfer catalysts (PTCs) has been successfully demonstrated in a multitude of asymmetric organic transformations and now represents an established fundamental catalysis principle in asymmetric organocatalysis [4,5,6,7,8]. In addition to Cinchona alkaloid-based PTCs, other chiral backbones have also been successfully used to access high-performance catalysts. A group of highly efficient binaphthyl-based ammonium salts was introduced by Maruoka (the so-called Maruoka catalysts) [9,10], which have since established themselves as the second most privileged class of chiral ammonium salt PTCs, alongside Cinchona alkaloids (Figure 1). Over the years, efficient chiral quaternary ammonium salts based on tartaric acid [11,12], α-amino acids [13,14], trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine [15], and others [16] have been developed. Many of the developed quaternary ammonium salts, especially catalysts based on Cinchona alkaloids and some Maruoka-type catalysts, possess a hydrogen-bonding donor in the form of a OH group, which leads to improved catalytic properties [17]. The incorporation of (thio)urea-containing hydrogen bond donors in catalysts based on Cinchona alkaloids, and, in particular, in catalysts based on amino acids and cyclohexane-1,2-diamine, contributed significantly to the diversification of the available catalysts and extended the scope of catalyzed asymmetric transformations [13,15,18,19].
Camphor is one of nature’s most privileged scaffolds, readily available in both enantiomeric forms. In addition, camphor undergoes a variety of interesting chemical transformations that functionalize, at first sight, inactive positions [21,22], allowing the synthesis of structurally and functionally very different products [23,24,25,26,27], thus making camphor a desirable starting material. The first reports on the application of camphor-derived organocatalysts date back to 2001. Camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts were employed to catalyze the α-alkylation of a glycine Schiff base with enantioselectivities up to 39% ee (Figure 1) [20]. Since then, several types of camphor-based organocatalysts have been reported, exhibiting covalent or noncovalent activation modes, both those with a camphor backbone as the sole chiral fragment and those in which the camphor backbone is covalently linked to a chiral amino acid, usually proline, via a suitable spacer [28].
As part of our ongoing study of camphor-based diamines as potential organocatalyst scaffolds [29], we reported the synthesis of 1,3-diamine-based bifunctional squaramide organocatalysts prepared from camphor and their application as efficient catalysts in Michael additions of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds and pyrrolones as nucleophiles to trans-β-nitrostyrene derivatives [30,31]. Extending this work, we report here the synthesis of a new type of 1,3-diamine-based bifunctional quaternary ammonium salt phase-transfer organocatalyst (Figure 1) and its evaluation in the electrophilic α-functionalization of β-keto ester and the alkylation of a glycine-derived Schiff base with methyl acrylate.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Camphor-derived endo-diamines 1a,b and exo-diamines 2a were prepared in four steps from commercially available (1S)-(+)-10-camphorsulfonic acid (Scheme 1) [29,30]. Camphorsulfonic acid was transformed into 10-iodocamphor in an Apple-type reaction, followed by nucleophilic substitution with pyrrolidine or dimethylamine in dimethyl sulfoxide. The thus formed tertiary amines were transformed into the corresponding oximes. The final oxime reduction with sodium in isopropanol gave a mixture of the corresponding major endo-diamines 1a,b and minor exo-diamines 2a, separable by column chromatography.
Next, the primary amino group of diamines 1a,b and 2a was Boc-protected, yielding 3a,b and 4a, respectively. In the following step, we introduced the benzyl group to the tertiary amine (benzyl groups have been very successfully established as useful motives for numerous quaternary ammonium salt phase-transfer catalysts [4,5,6,7,8]). Alkylation with benzyl bromide thus gave the quaternary ammonium salts 5a,b and 6a. Potassium carbonate was added to ensure complete conversion. They were subsequently Boc-deprotected with trifluoroacetic acid or aqueous hydrogen iodide, furnishing ammonium salts 7a,b and 8a, respectively (Scheme 1).
Finally, the ammonium salts 7a,b and 8a were reacted with aromatic iso(thio)cyanates 9 and squaramate 10 to give the quaternary trifluoroacetate ammonium salts I, IV, VI, VII, and IX. The quaternary iodide ammonium salts II, V, and VIII were formed from the corresponding trifluoroacetates I, IV, and VII, respectively, via anion metathesis with excess NaI in dichloromethane (Scheme 2). The quaternary iodide ammonium salts III and X were formed directly from the iodide ammonium salt 7b and the corresponding isothiocyanate. The catalysts thus formed have either (thio)urea or squaramide hydrogen bond donors (Supplementary Materials).

2.2. Structure Determination

The intermediates 38 were characterized by 1H- and 13C-NMR, IR, and HRMS. Compounds 1a and 2a were characterized by 1H-NMR. Phase-transfer catalysts IX have been fully characterized. The structures of the thioureas III and VI-Br (the bromide analog of the compound VI) were determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis (Figure 2). In both structures, the endo-stereochemistry was confirmed at the C-2 chiral center. The conformational differences in the two structures in the solid state are shown in Figure 3. The main differences are due to the conformation of the benzyl group and the arylthiourea structural elements.
The endo-stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center of compounds IIIX was further confirmed by NOESY measurements based on the cross-peak between the methyl group and the exo-H(2) proton (Figure 4). Similarly, the exo-stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center of compounds I and II was in line with the cross-peak between the methyl group and the exo-H–N proton observed in the NOESY spectra (Supplementary Materials).
Finally, the stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center can be correlated on the basis of the multiplicity of the H–C(3)-endo proton (He) (Figure 4). Exclusively in the endo-isomes of compounds 1, 3, 5, 7, and IIIX, the H–C(3)-endo proton appears as a doublet of doublet between 0.67 and 1.35 ppm (Table S7 in Supplementary Materials).

2.3. Organocatalytic Activity

First, the organocatalytic activity of camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts IIX was tested in electrophilic functionalizations of β-keto ester 9 (Scheme 3). Details of the optimization reactions can be found in the Supporting Information. The asymmetric α-fluorination of β-keto ester 9 with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI) proceeded under complete conversion and gave the product 10 with low enantioselectivity (87% yield and up to 29% ee). The best result was obtained with the catalyst VIII in toluene in the presence of K3PO4. In contrast, up to 86% ee has been reported in the literature for the α-fluorination of β-keto ester 9 with NFSI [15,32]. Similarly, the α-chlorination of 9 with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCI) gave product 11 in complete conversion and a meager 7% ee when squaramide PTC IX was used (for comparison, up to 80% ee has been reported in the literature when using alternative catalyst scaffolds [33]). Disappointingly, both the α-hydroxylation [34] of 9 with tosylimine 12/H2O2 and the ring opening of arylaziridine 14 [35] with 9 did not give the expected products 13 and 16, respectively. In both cases, no conversion was observed. Finally, the asymmetric Michael addition of glycine Schiff base 16 to methyl acrylate (17) was investigated, with up to 90% ee reported in the literature [36]. Catalyst V gave the expected product 18 with full conversion but low enantioselectivity (11% ee).

3. Materials and Methods

Solvents for extractions and chromatography were of technical grade and were distilled prior to use. Extracts were dried over technical-grade anhydrous Na2SO4. Melting points were determined on a Kofler micro hot stage. The NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance DPX 300 and Bruker Avance III 300 at 300 MHz for 1H nucleus, Bruker UltraShield 500 plus (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at 500 MHz for 1H and 126 MHz for 13C nucleus, and Bruker Ascend 600 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at 600 MHz for 1H and 151 MHz for 13C nucleus, using DMSO-d6 and CDCl3, with TMS as the internal standard, as solvents. Mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent 6224 Accurate Mass TOF LC/MS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and IR spectra on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum BX FTIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). CD spectra were recorded on a J-1500 Circular Dichroism Spectrophotometer (JASCO corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica gel (Silica gel 60, particle size: 0.035–0.070 mm (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA)). HPLC analyses were performed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity LC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Dionex Summit HPLC system (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using CHIRALPAK AD-H (0.46 cm ø × 25 cm) and CHIRALPAK OJ-H (0.46 cm ø × 25 cm), as the chiral columns (Chiral Technologies, Inc., West Chester, PA, United States). All the commercially available chemicals used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). In addition, (1S,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-1-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-amine (1b) was prepared following the literature procedure [30].

3.1. Reduction of (1S,4R,E)-1-[(Dimethylamino)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one oxime

Oxime (7.6 mmol, 1.6 g) was dissolved in propan-1-ol (86 mL) and heated to 95 ℃. Then, small pieces of sodium (approximately 50 mg) were added continuously for 1 h at 95 ℃; care was taken to ensure that the unreacted sodium (excess sodium) remained present in the reaction mixture at all times during the reaction. After completion of the reaction, the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in a mixture of water (20 mL) and Et2O (80 mL). The organic phase was washed with water (2 × 20 mL) and NaCl (aq. sat., 1 × 20 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. Diastereomers 1a and 2a were formed in a ratio of 2.6:1. The diastereomers were separated by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH/Et3N = 4:1:1).

3.1.1. (1S,2R,4R)-1-[(Dimethylamino)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-amine (2a)

Elutes first from the column. Yield: 175 mg (0.89 mmol, 12%) of colorless oil. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.79 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.13 (m, 1H), 1.34 (ddd, J = 12.8, 9.4, 3.9, 1H), 1.54–1.61 (m, 3H), 1.63 (t, J = 4.3, 1H), 1.64–1.75 (m, 2H), 1.93 (d, J = 11.4, 1H), 2.02 (d, J = 13.0, 1H), 2.27 (s, 6H), 2.74 (d, J = 13.0, 1H), 3.11 (dd, J = 8.7, 5.1, 1H).

3.1.2. (1S,2S,4R)-1-[(Dimethylamino)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-amine (1a)

Elutes second from the column. Yield: 850 mg (4.33 mmol, 57%) of colorless oil. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.67 (dd, J = 12.9, 4.3, 1H), 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H), 1.22 (ddd, J = 12.3, 9.5, 4.4, 1H), 1.38 (ddd, J = 12.3, 4.5, 2.0, 1H), 1.49 (t, J = 4.6, 1H), 1.70–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.80 (br s, 2H), 2.10 (d, J = 13.1, 1H), 2.13–2.17 (m, 1H), 2.20 (s, 6H), 2.21–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.45 (d, J = 13.0, 1H), 3.36 (ddd, J = 10.6, 4.3, 2.0, 1H).

3.2. Boc Protection of Chiral Amines—General Procedure 1 (GP1)

To a solution of amine 1 or 2 and triethylamine (1.4 equivalents) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 was added di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.4 equivalents). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. Dichloromethane was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was purified by column chromatography (CC). The fractions containing product 3 or 4 were combined and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo.

3.2.1. tert-Butyl {(1S,2S,4R)-1-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl}carbamate (3a)

Following GP1. Prepared from endo-amine 1a (4.69 mmol, 920 mg) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (6.56 mmol, 1.431 g), Et3N (6.56 mmol, 915 µL), CH2Cl2 (20 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:5). Yield: 1.39 g (4.69 mmol, 99%) of colorless oil. [α]r.t.D = +11.2 (0.15, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 297.2646 (MH)+; C17H33N2O2+ requires: m/z = 297.2536 (MH)+; νmax 3346, 2935, 2819, 2765, 1698, 1483, 1454, 1389, 1364, 1297, 1242, 1167, 1114, 1065, 1040, 1014, 946, 874, 837, 780 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H), 1.04 (dd, J = 13.4, 4.3, 1H), 1.21 (ddd, J = 12.2, 9.5, 4.4, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.45–1.51 (m, 1H), 1.56 (t, J = 4.6, 1H), 1.72 (tq, J = 12.1, 4.1, 1H), 1.86 (br t, 1H), 2.21 (s, 6H), 2.24 (d, J = 13.6, 1H), 2.28–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.36 (d, J = 13.8, 1H), 3.75 (s, 1H), 6.00 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.19, 20.31, 25.40, 28.39, 28.64, 37.92, 45.07, 48.10, 48.33, 50.98, 56.25, 61.97, 78.72, 157.52.

3.2.2. tert-Butyl {(1S,2R,4R)-1-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl}carbamate (4a)

Following GP1. Prepared from exo-amine 2a (0.81 mmol, 160 mg) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.134 mmol, 247 mg), Et3N (1.19 mmol, 166 µL), CH2Cl2 (4 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:5). Yield: 230 mg (0.78 mmol, 95%) of colorless oil. [α]r.t.D = +25.7 (0.175, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 297.2536 (MH)+; C17H33N2O2+ requires: m/z = 297.2537 (MH)+; νmax 3344, 2935, 2819, 2765, 1698, 1484, 1453, 1389, 1364, 1297, 1243, 1167, 1113, 1065, 1040, 1004, 943, 874, 837, 780 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.87 (s, 3H), 0.99 (s, 3H), 1.09–1.17 (m, 1H), 1.34 (t, J = 9.4, 1H), 1.42–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.67 (d, J = 3.5, 2H), 1.69–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.86 (d, J = 8.4, 1H), 2.24 (s, 6H), 2.25 (d, J = 13.9, 1H), 2.40 (d, J = 13.9, 1H), 3.71 (br s, 1H), 5.58 (br s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.95, 27.15, 28.50, 28.67, 30.48, 33.79, 40.55, 45.67, 48.03, 50.94, 57.44, 58.86, 78.90, 155.72.

3.2.3. tert-Butyl [(1S,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-1-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl}carbamate (3b)

Following GP1. Prepared from endo-amine 1b (3.91 mmol, 869 mg) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (5.474 mmol, 1.194 g), Et3N (5.474 mmol, 763 µL), CH2Cl2 (20 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:5). Yield: 1.251 g (3.88 mmol, 99%) of brownish oil. [α]r.t.D = +1.1 (0.295, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 323.2688 (MH)+; C19H35N2O2+ requires: m/z = 323.2693 (MH)+; νmax 3300, 2979, 2937, 2879, 2794, 1808, 1757, 1715, 1460, 1395, 1371, 1306, 1250, 1211, 1168, 1113, 1062, 950, 844, 775, 664 cm−1. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H), 1.07 (dd, J = 13.4, 4.4, 1H), 1.21 (ddd, J = 12.8, 9.5, 4.5, 1H), 1.4–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 9H), 1.56 (t, J = 4.6, 1H), 1.65–1.73 (m, 6H), 1.90 (ddd, J = 13.6, 8.9, 4.1, 1H), 2.31 (s, 1H), 2.37 (d, J = 13.4, 1H), 2.41–2.46 (m, 2H), 2.56–2.60 (m, 2H), 2.66 (d, J = 13.4, 1H), 3.72 (br s, 1H), 6.31 (br s, 1H). 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.18, 20.23, 24.16, 26.03, 28.43, 28.61, 37.58, 45.22, 47.88, 50.81, 56.47, 56.82, 58.03, 78.48, 157.80.

3.3. Benzylation of Tertiary Amines—General Procedure 2 (GP2)

To a stirred mixture of tertiary amine 3 or 4 and K2CO3 (1.1 equivalents) in anhydrous DMF was added benzyl bromide (1.1 equivalents). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. DMF was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was purified by column chromatography (CC). The fractions containing product 5 or 6 were combined and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo.

3.3.1. N-Benzyl-1-{(1S,2S,4R)-2-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl}-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium Bromide (5a)

Following GP2. Prepared from compound 3a (1.06 mmol, 315 mg) and benzyl bromide (1.16 mmol, 139 µL), K2CO3 (1.16 mmol, 160 mg), DMF (5 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 340 mg (0.73 mmol, 69%) of colorless oil. [α]r.t.D = +14.0 (0.087, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 387.3003 (M)+; C24H39N2O2 requires: m/z = 387.3006 (M)+; νmax 3369, 3197, 2951, 2199, 2163, 2098, 1989, 1685, 1540, 1490, 1477, 1454, 1392, 1379, 1366, 1299, 1284, 1271, 1252, 1217, 1158, 1125, 1065, 1042, 1012, 947, 917, 882, 868, 854, 839, 783, 752, 732, 706 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.87–0.93 (m, 1H), 0.94 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 3H), 1.29–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 1.58 (t, J = 4.4, 1H), 1.86 (br t, J = 11.7, 1H), 1.93–2.03 (m, 1H), 2.21 (br t, J = 13.1, 1H), 2.47 (d, J = 11.7, 1H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.44 (br d, J = 13.6, 1H), 4.11 (br d, J = 13.5, 1H), 4.18 (br t, J = 9.9, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 12.3, 1H), 5.03 (br s, 1H), 5.20 (d, J = 12.2, 1H), 7.32–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.4, 2H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.48, 20.76, 27.34, 28.28, 28.75, 40.19, 43.67, 50.40, 51.55, 53.72, 54.15, 69.24, 70.42, 80.67, 127.78, 128.94, 130.51, 133.47, 156.14.

3.3.2. N-Benzyl-1-{(1S,2R,4R)-2-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl}-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium Bromide (6a)

Following GP2. Prepared from compound 4a (2.53 mmol, 748 mg) and benzyl bromide (3.795 mmol, 453 µL), K2CO3 (2.78 mmol, 385 mg), DMF (13 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 904 mg (1.93 mmol, 76%) of colorless oil. [α]r.t.D = −4.3 (0.26, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 387.3000 (M)+; C24H39N2O2+ requires: m/z = 387.3006 (M)+; νmax 3341, 2965, 2885, 2156, 1698, 1606, 1508, 1475, 1456, 1365, 1278, 1247, 1168, 1060, 1019, 953, 860, 782, 732, 706 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.92 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.5, 1H), 0.97 (s, 3H), 1.03 (s, 3H), 1.35 (t, J = 4.8, 1H), 1.39 (s, 9H), 1.62 (t, J = 4.5, 1H), 1.88–1.99 (m, 2H), 2.29 (br t, J = 12.9, 1H), 2.46–2.56 (m, 1H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.43 (br d, J = 14.3, 1H), 4.16–4.26 (m, 2H), 4.92 (d, J = 10.9, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 12.4, 1H), 5.21 (d, J = 12.4, 1H), 7.37–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.63 (d, J = 6.9, 2H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.60, 20.95, 27.47, 28.40, 28.91, 40.49, 43.82, 50.54, 51.73, 53.85, 54.30, 69.39, 70.63, 80.94, 127.79, 129.12, 130.72, 133.57, 156.18.

3.3.3. 1-Benzyl-1-({(1S,2S,4R)-2-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl}methyl)pyrrolidin-1-ium Bromide (5b)

Following GP2. Prepared from compound 3b (2.48 mmol, 828 mg) and benzyl bromide (2.73 mmol, 324 µL), K2CO3 (2.73 mmol, 377 mg), DMF (13 mL), 25 °C, 24 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 469 mg (1.45 mmol, 59%) of brownish semisolid. [α]r.t.D = +17.7 (0.12, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 413.3161 (M)+; C26H41N2O2+ requires: m/z = 413.3162 (M)+; νmax 3323, 3270, 2965, 2923, 1708, 1639, 1531, 1452, 1388, 1363, 1307, 1247, 1159, 1121, 1066, 1028, 1002, 923, 901, 855, 839, 780, 710 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.92 (s, 3H), 0.91–0.96 (m, 1H), 0.96 (s, 3H), 1.32–1.35 (br t, 1H), 1.37 (s, 9H), 1.55 (t, J = 4.5, 1H), 1.62–1.73 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.88–2.04 (m, 2H), 2.04–2.13 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.27 (m, 1H), 2.39–2.48 (m, 1H), 3.39 (d, J = 14.0, 1H), 3.41–3.50 (m, 1H), 3.58–3.74 (m, 2H), 3.96 (ddd, J = 12.3, 8.1, 6.3, 1H), 4.13 (d, J = 14.0, 1H), 4.24 (tt, J = 10.8, 3.1, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 5.22 (br s, 1H), 5.26 (d, J = 10.8, 1H), 7.28–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.0, 2H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.33, 20.70, 21.60, 22.07, 27.88, 28.29, 28.81, 39.70, 43.63, 51.48, 53.44, 53.74, 59.55, 62.11, 63.58, 67.05, 80.48, 128.21, 128.99, 130.40, 133.30, 156.03.

3.4. Boc Deprotection of Amines—General Procedure 3 (GP3)

To a solution of amine 5 or 6 in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL/mmol) was added trifluoroacetic acid (2.5 mL/mmol). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 2 h. Dichloromethane and trifluoroacetic acid were evaporated in vacuo and the residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL/mmol). The organic phase was washed with NaOH (aq., 2 M, 2 × 2.5 mL/mmol) and NaCl (aq. sat., 1 × 2.5 mL/mmol). The volatiles were evaporated in vacuo to give product 7 or 8.

3.4.1. (1S,2S,4R)-1-[(Benzyldimethylammonio)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-aminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (7a)

Following GP3. Prepared from compound 5a (2.1 mmol, 1 g), trifluoroacetic acid (5 mL), CH2Cl2 (5 mL), 25 °C, 2 h. Volatile components were evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane and washed with NaOH (aq., 2 M) and NaCl (aq. sat.). Yield: 605 mg (1.51 mmol, 72%) of colorless solid, mp = 179.9–182.1 °C. [α]r.t.D = +16.2 (0.125, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 287.2483 (M)+; C19H31N2+ requires: m/z = 287.2482 (M)+; νmax 3377, 3292, 3042, 2943, 2881, 1685, 1585, 1479, 1457, 1401, 1372, 1302, 1196, 1157, 1113, 1048, 1025, 1010, 989, 935, 917, 881, 854, 819, 780, 785, 753, 733, 716, 707, 632, 607 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.89 (dd, J = 3.4, 13.1, 1H); 0.93 (s, 3H); 0.97 (s, 3H); 1.31–1.38 (m, 1H); 1.61 (t, J = 4.6, 1H); 1.77–1.84 (m, 1H); 1.86–1.96 (m, 1H); 2.05–2.13 (m, 1H); 2.44–2.53 (m, 1H); 3.28 (s, 3H); 3.37 (s, 3H); 3.43–3.49 (m, 1H); 3.68 (d, J = 13.9, 1H); 3.72 (d, J = 13.9, 1H); 4.97 (d, J = 12.4, 1H); 5.11 (d, J = 12.3, 1H); 7.40–7.48 (m, 3H); 7.56–7.60 (m, 2H), signal for NH2 is missing. 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.41, 20.51, 26.70, 29.29, 44.19, 44.63, 49.97, 50.49, 52.44, 53.20, 53.69, 69.11, 71.98, 117.64 (q, J = 297.3), 128.29, 129.14, 130.57, 133.49, 161.16 (q, J = 32.7).

3.4.2. (1S,2R,4R)-1-[(Benzyldimethylammonio)methyl]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-aminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (8a)

Following GP3. Prepared from compound 6a (1.92 mmol, 900 mg), trifluoroacetic acid (5 mL), CH2Cl2 (5 mL), 25 °C, 2 h. Volatile components were evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane and washed with NaOH (aq., 2 M) and NaCl (aq. sat.). Yield: 567 mg (1.41 mmol, 74%) of colorless solid, mp = 157.1–158.8 °C. [α]r.t.D = −9.8 (0.11, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 287.2477 (M)+; C19H31N2+ requires: m/z = 287.2482 (M)+; νmax 2953, 2883, 1684, 1476, 1456, 1393, 1371, 1311, 1196, 1153, 1113, 1035, 1009, 936, 911, 851, 820, 798, 784, 735, 714, 631 cm−1. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H), 1.15–1.22 (m, 1H), 1.34–1.41 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.67 (s, 1H), 1.77 (d, J = 13.9, 3H), 1.92 (dd, J = 13.0, 7.3, 2H), 3.01 (dd, J = 9.0, 4.9, 1H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 3.33 (d, J = 13.5, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 13.5, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 12.5, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 12.8, 1H), 7.35–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.4, 2H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.58, 21.40, 27.73, 32.27, 44.01, 44.29, 50.60, 51.35, 51.53, 52.44, 57.11, 64.64, 71.26, 117.56 (q, J = 296.8), 127.79, 129.26, 130.81, 133.53, 161.25 (q, J = 32.7).

3.4.3. Synthesis of 1-{[(1S,2S,4R)-2-Ammonio-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl]methyl}-1-benzylpyrrolidin-1-ium Iodide (7b)

Compound 5b (0.55 mmol, 270 mg) was dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (8 mL), and then HI (aq., 48%, 5 equivalents, 2.75 mmol, 495 µL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at 25 °C. Volatile components were evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (5 mL) and washed with NaOH (aq., 2 M, 2 × 5mL) and NaCl (aq. sat., 1 × 5mL). Yield: 150 mg (0.34 mmol, 62%) of yellowish semisolid. [α]r.t.D = +18.8 (0.15, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 313.2635 (M)+; C21H33N2+ requires: m/z = 313.2635 (M)+; νmax 3273, 2951, 2881, 2188, 2152, 1969, 1594, 1458, 1372, 1303, 1217, 1142, 1077, 1033, 1004, 917, 822, 764, 725, 641 cm−1. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.03–1.06 (m, 1H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 1.41–1.50 (m, 1H), 1.67 (t, J = 4.6, 1H), 1.77 (td, J = 10.7, 9.7, 6.5, 1H), 1.81–1.88 (m, 1H), 1.92–1.99 (m, 1H), 2.05–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.12–2.21 (m, 2H), 2.26 (ddd, J = 13.4, 9.4, 4.1, 1H), 2.36–2.75 (m, 3H), 3.68 (dt, J = 10.5, 3.1, 1H), 3.75 (ddd, J = 12.3, 8.5, 5.9, 1H), 3.81–3.87 (m, 1H), 3.83 (d, J = 14.1, 1H), 3.89 (d, J = 14.2, 1H), 4.07 (ddd, J = 12.2, 8.3, 6.3, 1H), 4.16 (ddd, J = 11.9, 8.2, 6.2, 1H), 5.06 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 5.25 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 7.42–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.66 (d, J = 6.6, 2H). 13C-NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.88, 21.16, 21.96, 22.08, 26.80, 29.23, 42.76, 44.69, 52.63, 53.69, 54.48, 60.85, 61.96, 63.75, 67.23, 128.66, 129.39, 130.71, 133.42.

3.5. Synthesis of Phase-Transfer Bifunctional Catalysts—General Procedure 4 (GP4)

Amine 7 or 8 was dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2, the appropriate electrophile was added (1.2–1.4 equivalents), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature. The volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography (CC). The fractions containing product IX were combined and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo.

3.6. Trifluoroacetate Anion Exchange—General Procedure 5 (GP5)

The column was packed with NaI (5 g) and conditioned with ethyl acetate. The trifluoroacetate phase-transfer catalyst was dissolved in ethyl acetate and applied to the NaI column. The fractions containing the product were combined and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. Based on the 19F NMR spectra (presence of a signal for fluorine from trifluoroacetate anion), the procedure was repeated as necessary.

3.6.1. N-Benzyl-1-((1R,2R,4R)-2-{3-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thioureido}-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl)-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (I)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 8a (0.585 mmol, 300 mg) and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isothiocyanate (1.05 mmol, 192 µL), CH2Cl2 (4 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by evaporation followed by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 316 mg (0.47 mmol, 80%) of yellowish solid, mp = 87.5–89.0 °C. [α]r.t.D = +6.8 (0.13, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 558.2374 (M)+; C28H34F6N3S+ requires: m/z = 558.2372 (M)+; νmax 3260, 2962, 2885, 2091, 1679, 1622, 1523, 1472, 1382, 1333, 1274, 1218, 1171, 1125, 999, 970, 883, 848, 828, 780, 760, 727, 700, 680 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.89 (s, 3H); 1.18 (s, 3H); 1.36–1.45 (m, 1H); 1.66–1.74 (m, 1H); 1.81–1.94 (m, 4H); 2.22 (dd, J = 8.6, 13.4, 1H); 3.00 (s, 3H); 3.08 (s, 3H); 3.29 (d, J = 14.5, 1H); 4.65 (d, J = 12.6, 1H); 4.74–4.80 (m, 1H); 4.84–4.93 (m, 2H); 7.40–7.54 (m, 6H); 8.36 (s, 2H); 8.79 (d, J = 7.9, 1H); 10.97 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.76, 20.93, 27.84, 34.28, 41.11, 43.92, 50.38, 50.44, 51.25, 53.08, 58.99, 66.90, 71.59, 113.57, 116.74–117.00 (m), 117.08 (q, J = 294.0), 122.13 (d, J = 4.0), 123.41 (q, J = 272.6), 124.49, 126.58, 129.53, 131.34 (q, J = 33.2), 131.37, 133.09, 141.70, 162.07 (q, J = 34.3), 180.02.

3.6.2. N-Benzyl-1-((1R,2R,4R)-2-{3-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thioureido}-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl)-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium Iodide (II)

Following GP5. Prepared from catalyst I (0.21 mmol, 140 mg), dissolved in ethyl acetate (4 mL) and filtered through a pad of NaI. Volatile components were evaporated in vacuo. Yield: 140 mg (0.20 mmol, 96%) of colorless solid, mp = 61.4–62.9 °C. [α]r.t.D = +5 (0.19, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 558.2365 (M)+; C28H34F6N3S+ requires: m/z = 558.2372 (M)+; νmax 3305, 2964, 1674, 1536, 1473, 1384, 1336, 1275, 1172, 1123, 1000, 971, 884, 846, 801, 780, 759, 725, 701, 679 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.96 (s, 3H); 1.28 (s, 3H); 1.39–1.46 (m, 1H); 1.64–1.73 (m, 1H); 1.81–2.01 (m, 4H); 2.23 (dd, J = 8.8, 13.4, 1H); 3.08 (s, 3H); 3.14 (s, 3H); 3.51 (d, J = 14.3, 1H); 4.81–4.89 (m, 1H); 4.96 (d, J = 12.5, 1H); 5.07 (d, J = 13.9, 1H); 5.17 (d, J = 12.7, 1H); 7.38–7.45 (m, 2H); 7.46–7.51 (m, 1H); 7.54 (s, 1H); 7.55–7.60 (m, 2H); 8.08 (d, J = 8.1, 1H); 8.43 (s, 2H); 10.52 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 21.37, 21.94, 27.90, 34.23, 41.04, 43.83, 50.02, 50.70, 51.55, 53.44, 59.26, 66.70, 70.85, 117.35, 122.27, 123.36 (q, J = 272.7), 126.56, 129.49, 131.36, 131.36 (q, J = 33.3), 133.31, 141.23, 179.91.

3.6.3. 1-Benzyl-1-[((1S,2S,4R)-2-{3-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thioureido}-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl)methyl]yrrolidine-1-ium Iodide (III)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 7b (0.34 mmol, 150 mg) and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isothiocyanate (0.68 mmol, 124 µL), CH2Cl2 (3 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 10:1). Yield: 99 mg (0.14 mmol, 41%) of brownish semisolid. [α]r.t.D = +20 (0.047, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 584.2519 (M)+; C30H36F6N3S+ requires: m/z = 584.2529 (M)+; νmax 3194, 3126, 2968, 2149, 1625, 1589, 1542, 1492, 1472, 1381, 1324, 1271, 1249, 1222, 1166, 1136, 1108, 1094, 1061, 1025, 999, 967, 909, 885, 847, 756, 721, 701, 679, 612 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.03 (s, 3H); 1.06 (s, 3H); 1.15 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.9, 1H); 1.51–1.93 (m, 5H); 1.98–2.06 (m, 1H); 2.16–2.31 (m, 2H), 2.61–2.70 (m, 1H); 2.99–3.07 (m, 1H); 3.41–3.51 (m, 2H), 3.67–3.83 (m, 3H); 3.83–3.93 (m, 1H); 4.63 (d, J = 12.9, 1H); 4.96 (d, J = 12.8, 1H); 5.34–5.45 (m, 1H); 7.39–7.45 (m, 2H); 7.47–7.52 (m, 1H); 7.54–7.58 (m, 2H); 7.60 (s, 1H); 8.34–8.43 (m, 3H); 10.67 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.98, 20.65, 21.49, 21.93, 28.65, 29.57, 38.39, 43.68, 51.83, 54.54, 57.00, 60.89, 61.91, 64.34, 67.34, 117.85–118.26 (m), 123.08–123.29 (m), 123.38 (q, J = 209.2), 127.38, 129.67, 131.28, 131.57 (q, J = 33.4), 133.39, 140.92, 182.20.

3.6.4. N-Benzyl-1-((1R,2S,4R)-2-{3-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thioureido}-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl)-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (IV)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 7a (0.39 mmol, 200 mg) and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isothiocyanate (0.70 mmol, 128 µL), CH2Cl2 (4 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 250 mg (0.37 mmol, 95%) of colorless solid, mp = 153–155 °C. [α]r.t.D = +2.1 (0.11, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 558.2363 (M)+; C28H34F6N3S+ requires: m/z = 558.2372 (M)+; νmax 3275, 3247, 3047, 2961, 2890, 1682, 1542, 1473, 1385, 1278, 1177, 1132, 966, 887, 848, 801, 719, 702, 680 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.97 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 1.10 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.7, 1H), 1.51 (ddd, J = 13.4, 9.2, 4.7, 1H), 1.73 (t, J = 4.6, 1H), 1.78–1.89 (m, 1H), 1.95–2.12 (m, 1H), 2.59–2.67 (m, 1H), 2.68–2.76 (m, 1H), 3.03 (s, 3H), 3.04 (s, 3H), 3.47 (d, J = 13.7, 1H), 3.72 (d, J = 13.7, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 12.6, 1H), 5.22 (tt, J = 10.2, 3.0, 1H), 7.34–7.40 (m, 4H), 7.43–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 8.29 (s, 2H), 8.91 (d, J = 9.8, 1H), 11.09 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.81, 20.25, 28.05, 28.57, 38.68, 43.75, 50.78, 51.03, 51.76, 54.43, 56.70, 69.58, 73.03, 117.02 (q, J = 294.4), 117.24–117.53 (m), 122.72 (d, J = 3.4), 123.39 (q, J = 272.7), 126.96, 129.47, 131.24, 131.48 (q, J = 33.4), 133.03, 141.44, 161.62 (q, J = 34.1), 181.96.

3.6.5. N-Benzyl-1-((1R,2S,4R)-2-{3-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thioureido}-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl)-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium Iodide (V)

Following GP5. Prepared from catalyst IV (0.17 mmol, 116 mg), dissolved in ethyl acetate (3 mL) and filtered through a pad of NaI. Volatile components were evaporated in vacuo. Yield: 109 mg (0.16 mmol, 92%) of white solid, mp = decomposition above 350 °C. [α]r.t.D = +69.2 (0.013, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 558.2368 (M)+; C28H34F6N3S+ requires: m/z = 558.2372 (M)+; νmax 3247, 2960, 2928, 2857, 2175, 2163, 2135, 2034, 1996, 1954, 1722, 1595, 1534, 1473, 1385, 1277, 1177, 1135, 965, 887, 730, 701, 680 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 0.98 (s, 3H), 1.02 (dd, J = 13.0, 3.7, 1H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 1.43–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.72 (t, J = 4.4, 1H), 1.90–2.06 (m, 2H), 2.16–2.24 (m, 1H), 2.45–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.95 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 3.60 (d, J = 14.1, 1H), 3.71 (d, J = 14.0, 1H), 4.52–4.63 (m, 2H), 5.04–5.12 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.59 (m, 5H), 7.81 (s, 1H), 8.28 (s, 2H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.8, 1H), 10.32 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 19.25, 20.04, 26.97, 28.11, 38.10, 42.97, 49.08, 50.46, 51.23, 53.88, 56.13, 67.81, 70.46, 116.76–117.00 (m), 122.27–122.44 (m), 123.17 (q, J = 272.8), 128.03, 128.86, 130.17 (q, J = 32.8), 130.38, 133.06, 141.46, 181.00.

3.6.6. N-Benzyl-1-[(1R,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-2-(3-phenylthioureido)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl]-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (VI)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 7a (0.39 mmol, 200 mg) and phenyl isothiocyanate (0.70 mmol, 84 µL), CH2Cl2 (4 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by evaporation followed by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 119 mg (0.22 mmol, 56 %) of colorless solid, mp = 180–183 °C. [α]r.t.D = +6.7 (0.06, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 422.2618 (M)+; C26H36N3S+ requires: m/z = 422.2624 (M)+; νmax 3244, 2959, 2884, 1683, 1540, 1507, 1489, 1473, 1457, 1362, 1317, 1202, 1148, 1056, 1033, 851, 801, 727 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.96 (s, 3H); 1.04 (s, 3H); 1.08 (dd, J = 13.3, 3.7, 1H); 1.45–1.53 (m, 1H); 1.67–1.79 (m, 2H); 1.96–2.06 (m, 1H); 2.57–2.65 (m, 1H); 2.67–2.76 (m, 1H); 2.98 (s, 3H); 3.03 (s, 3H); 3.41 (d, J = 13.6, 1H); 3.73 (d, J = 13.8, 1H); 4.54 (d, J = 12.5, 1H); 4.79 (d, J = 12.4, 1H), 5.24–5.31 (m, 1H), 7.04–7.10 (m, 1H); 7.22–7.29 (m, 2H); 7.33–7.47 (m, 5H); 7.60–7.68 (m, 2H); 8.64 (d, J = 9.9, 1H); 10.45 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.95, 20.50, 28.53, 28.65, 38.67, 43.85, 51.11, 51.22, 51.72, 54.34, 56.50, 69.08, 72.83, 123.82, 124.84, 127.30, 128.46, 129.38, 130.98, 133.35, 139.65, 182.21 (two signals missing).

3.6.7. N-Benzyl-1-[(1R,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-2-(3-phenylureido)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl]-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (VII)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 7a (0.39 mmol, 200 mg) and phenyl isocyanate (0.69 mmol, 76 µL), CH2Cl2 (4 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by evaporation followed by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 5:1). Yield: 57 mg (0.11 mmol, 28%) of colorless solid, mp = 120.0–123.8 °C. [α]r.t.D = +5 (0.08, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 406.2850 (M)+; C26H36N3O+ requires: m/z = 406.2853 (M)+; νmax 3261, 2960, 2886, 2150, 1683, 1598, 1550, 1489, 1457, 1313, 1202, 1139, 846, 801, 727, 702 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.95 (s, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 1.12 (dd, J = 13.3, 3.6, 1H), 1.44–1.53 (m, 1H), 1.55–1.68 (m, 2H), 2.03–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.47–2.55 (m, 1H), 2.60–2.67 (m, 1H), 3.04 (s, 3H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 3.36 (d, J = 13.7, 1H), 3.88 (d, J = 13.7, 1H), 4.52–4.59 (m, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 12.4, 1H), 4.97 (d, J = 12.3, 1H), 6.91–6.98 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.57 (m, 2H), 9.31 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.71, 20.51, 28.46, 28.68, 39.90, 44.00, 50.46, 51.29, 51.76, 52.02, 54.06, 68.41, 72.90, 117.34 (d, J = 295.3), 118.79, 122.19, 127.49, 128.82, 129.24, 130.75, 133.32, 139.93, 156.51, 161.52 (q, J = 33.5).

3.6.8. N-Benzyl-1-[(1R,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-2-(3-phenylureido)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl]-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium Iodide (VIII)

Following GP5. Prepared from catalyst VII (0.26 mmol, 139 mg), dissolved in ethyl acetate (5 mL), and filtered through a pad of NaI. All volatile components were evaporated in vacuo. Yield: 111 mg (0.21 mmol, 80%) of colorless solid, mp = 153–155 °C. [α]r.t.D = +78 (0.073, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 406.2850 (M)+; C26H36N3O+ requires: m/z = 406.2853 (M)+; νmax 3277, 2967, 2881, 1678, 1597, 1543, 1487, 1442, 1377, 1311, 1217, 1158, 1128, 1030, 949, 852, 816, 753, 729, 694 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.01 (s, 6H), 1.14 (dd, J = 13.3; 3.6, 1H), 1.46–1.60 (m, 2H), 1.62 (t, J = 4.5, 1H), 2.23–2.31 (m, 1H), 2.48–2.56 (m, 1H), 2.67–2.76 (m, 1H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 3H), 3.34 (d, J = 13.7, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 13.6, 1H), 4.54–4.65 (m, 1H), 4.80 (d, J = 12.3, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 12.3, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 10.8, 1H), 6.94–7.00 (m, 1H), 7.19–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.6, 2H), 7.38–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.48–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.62 (m, 2H), 8.93 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.88, 20.81, 28.41, 29.13, 39.96, 44.02, 50.51, 51.57, 51.95, 52.34, 54.45, 68.01, 72.56, 118.82, 122.49, 127.33, 128.83, 129.29, 130.86, 133.38, 139.60, 156.34.

3.6.9. N-Benzyl-1-{(1R,2S,4R)-2-[(2-{[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}-3,4-dioxocyclobut-1-en-1-yl)amino]-7,7-dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl}-N,N-dimethylmethanaminium 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetate (IX)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound 7a (0.19 mmol, 100 mg) and 3-((3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)amino)-4-ethoxycyclobut-3-ene-1,2-dione (0.30 mmol, 106.4 mg), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by evaporation followed by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 4:1). Yield: 106 mg (0.15 mmol, 75%) of colorless solid, mp = 148.9–150.1 °C. [α]r.t.D = +65 (0.006, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 594.2545 (M)+; C31H34F6N3O2 requires: m/z = 594.2550 (M)+; νmax 3420, 3153, 3034, 2967, 2888, 1791, 1686, 1603, 1551, 1475, 1427, 1377, 1276, 1176, 1127, 948, 931, 880, 848, 831, 730, 701, 684, 666 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.35 (dd, J = 13.2, 3.6, 1H), 1.60–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.77 (t, J = 4.5, 1H), 1.89 (br t, J = 13.3, 1H), 1.93–2.05 (m, 1H), 2.52–2.62 (m, 1H), 3.01 (s, 1H), 3.14 (s, 3H), 3.16 (s, 3H), 3.42 (d, J = 13.8, 1H), 4.33 (d, J = 13.9, 1H), 4.63 (d, J = 12.5, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 12.5, 1H), 5.27 (t, J = 9.9, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.4, 2H), 7.45–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.66 (m, 2H), 8.21 (s, 2H), 9.13 (d, J = 9.2, 1H), 11.34 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.80, 20.66, 26.61, 28.93, 41.29, 44.05, 50.80, 51.47, 52.79, 55.04, 58.56, 70.65, 73.17, 116.24, 119.01, 123.33 (q, J = 272.9), 126.85, 129.59, 131.38, 132.65 (q, J = 33.4), 133.40, 140.74, 165.81, 169.02, 181.07, 185.00 (two carbons missing).

3.6.10. 1-Benzyl-1-{[(1S,2S,4R)-7,7-dimethyl-2-(3-phenylthioureido)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1-yl]methyl}pyrrolidin-1-ium Iodide (X)

Following GP4. Prepared from compound (7b) (0.25 mmol, 109 mg) and phenyl isothiocyanate (0.38 mmol, 45 µL), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), 25 °C, 16 h. Isolation by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/MeOH = 10:1). Yield: 72 mg (0.13 mmol, 50%) of colorless solid, mp = 178–180 °C. [α]r.t.D = +7.4 (0.14, MeOH). EI-HRMS: m/z = 448.2776 (M)+; C28H38N3S requires: m/z = 448.2781 (M)+; νmax 3209, 3030, 2953, 1685, 1597, 1528, 1495, 1450, 1360, 1308, 1243, 1144, 1089, 1027, 1002, 915, 758, 716, 698, 607 cm−1. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.99 (s, 3H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 1.12 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.9, 1H), 1.42–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.65 (t, J = 4.3, 1H), 1.71–1.89 (m, 2H), 1.96–2.07 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.23 (m, 2H), 2.53–2.64 (br t, J = 11.8, 1H), 2.97 (br s, 1H), 3.40 (d, J = 13.9, 1H), 3.42–3.48 (m, 1H), 3.70 (dt, J = 12.3, 7.4, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 13.8, 1H), 3.83–3.99 (m, 2H), 4.64 (d, J = 12.7, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 12.7, 1H), 5.40 (br t, J = 10.6, 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.3, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.6, 2H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.4, 2H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.3, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 6.8, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.2, 2H), 8.10 (d, J = 10.4, 1H), 10.10 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 19.98, 20.70, 21.34, 22.00, 28.48, 29.80, 38.39, 43.70, 51.66, 54.42, 56.54, 60.24, 62.02, 63.82, 67.18, 123.99, 125.16, 127.84, 128.55, 129.49, 130.93, 133.61, 139.32, 182.27.

3.7. General Procedure for the α-Fluorination of β-Keto Ester 9

Aqueous K3PO4 or other base (2 M, 2 equivalents, 0.1 mL) was added to a mixture of β-keto ester 9 (0.1 mmol, 24.4 mg, ω = 95%) and organocatalyst IIX (2 mol%) in toluene or in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under argon atmosphere. The mixture was cooled to −10℃ and NFSI (1.1 equivalents, 34.7 mg) was added in two portions over 2 h. The reaction mixture was stirred for another 12 h at −10 °C. After completion, the reaction was quenched by addition of NH4Cl (aq. sat, 4 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/n-Heptane = 1:15). Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC (Chiralpak AD-H, n-Hexane/i-PrOH = 200:1, flow rate 0.75 mL/min, λ = 250 nm, 10 °C) after isolation by column chromatography.

3.8. General Procedure for the α-Chlorination of β-Keto Ester 9

To a mixture of β-keto ester 9 (0.1 mmol, 24.4 mg, ω = 95%), organocatalyst II, III, VIVIII, or IX (1 mol%), and K2HPO4 (solid, 1 equivalent, 17.4 mg) in chlorobenzene (2 mL), at −20 °C under argon atmosphere, was added N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS, 1.2 equivalents, 16 mg), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at −20 °C. After completion, the reaction was quenched by addition of NH4Cl (aq. sat, 4 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/n-Heptane = 1:12). Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC (Chiralpak OJ-H, n-Hexane/i-PrOH = 70:30, flow rate 0.7 mL/min, λ = 250 nm, 10 °C) isolation with column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/n-Heptane = 1:12).

3.9. General Procedure for the α-Hydroxylation of β-Keto Ester 9

Into a flame-dried Schlenk flask under argon atmosphere at 0℃, a mixture of β-keto ester 9 (0.1 mmol, 24.4 mg, ω = 95%) and N-(4-bromobenzylidene)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (12) (1 equivalent, 33.8 mg) was added. Catalyst III, IV, VII, VIII, or IX (5 mol%) was dissolved in anhydrous methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE, 5 mL) and slowly added via syringe into the reaction mixture. After addition of H2O2 (1 equivalent, 35% in water, 8.6 µL), the reaction mixture was stirred for 20 h at room temperature. After 24 h at 25 °C, the reaction mixture was filtrated trough a plug of anhydrous Na2SO4 and washed with dichloromethane.

3.10. General Procedure for the Ring-Opening of Aryl-Aziridine 14 with β-Keto Ester 9

To a mixture of β-keto ester 9 (0.1 mmol, 24.4 mg, ω = 95%), catalyst IV, VIII, or IX (5 mol%), and K3PO4 (2 equivalents, 42 mg) in toluene (2.5 mL) under argon atmosphere, 2-phenyl-1-tosylaziridine (14) (2 equivalent, 54.6 mg) was added and stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After 24 h at 25 °C, the reaction mixture was filtrated through a plug of anhydrous Na2SO4 and washed with dichloromethane.

3.11. General Procedure for the Michael Addition of Glycine Schiff Base 16 with Methyl Acrylate (17)

Degassed solvent (2.5 mL) was added to a mixture of tert-butyl 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)acetate (16) (0.05 mmol, 14.8 mg), catalyst I, IIIV, VII, VIII, or IX (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (1.5–10.0 equivalents) in a Schlenk tube at 25 °C or 0 °C; then, methyl acrylate (17) (1.5 equivalents, 6.8 µL) was added. After 24 h at 25 °C or 0 °C, the reaction mixture was filtrated through a plug of anhydrous Na2SO4 and washed with ethyl acetate. The volatiles were evaporated in vacuo. The crude product 18 was purified by column chromatography (Silica gel 60, EtOAc/Heptane = 1:15). Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC (Chiralpak AD-H, n-Hexane/i-PrOH = 95:5, flow rate 0.5 mL/min, λ = 250 nm, 10 °C) after filtration of the reaction mixture through a plug of Na2SO4.

3.12. X-ray Crystallography

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on an Agilent Technologies SuperNova Dual diffractometer with an Atlas detector using monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 150 K. The data were processed using CrysAlis PRO [37]. Using Olex2.1.2. [38], the structures were solved by direct methods implemented in SHELXS [39] or SHELXT [40] and refined by a full-matrix least-squares procedure based on F2 with SHELXT-2014/7 [41]. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and were refined using a riding model. The drawings and the analysis of bond lengths, angles, and intermolecular interactions were carried out using Mercury [42] and Platon [43]. Structural and other crystallographic details on data collection and refinement for compounds VI-Br and III have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as a supplementary publication under CCDC Deposition Numbers 2204647 and 2204648, respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033; e-mail: [email protected]).

4. Conclusions

Ten novel quaternary ammonium salt bifunctional phase-transfer organocatalysts based on a chiral (+)-camphor framework were prepared. Starting from camphor-derived 1,3-diamines, catalysts IX were synthesized in a four-step sequence: Boc protection–benzylation–Boc deprotection–reaction with iso(thio)cyanate/squaramate. The catalysts prepared bear either a (thio)urea or squaramide hydrogen bond donor and possess either a trifluoroacetate or iodide counteranion. The quaternary iodide ammonium salts II, V, and VIII were formed from the corresponding trifluoroacetates I, IV, and VII, respectively, via anion methathesis with an excess of NaI. The phase-transfer catalysts have been fully characterized; the stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center was unambiguously determined. Their organocatalytic activity was investigated in the electrophilic functionalization of the β-keto ester 9. The α-fluorination and chlorination of β-keto ester 9 proceeded to full conversion, affording the desired products 10 and 11 with low enantioselectivity (up to 29% ee). α-Hydroxylation and ring opening of N-tosylaziridine 14 gave no product. Finally, the Michael addition of glycine Schiff base 16 to methyl acrylate (17) gave the expected product 18 with full conversion and up to 11% ee.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28031515/s1. Synthesis and characterization data; HPLC data; copies of 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra; copies of HRMS reports; structure determination by X-ray diffraction analysis. Figure S1. Applied organocatalysts IIX. Figure S2. Molecular structure of compound VI-Br. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Figure S3. Molecular structure of compound III. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Table S1. Evaluation of organocatalysts IIX in the fluorination of β-keto ester 9. Table S2. Further evaluation of organocatalysts III, VIII, and IX in the fluorination of β-keto ester 9. Table S3. Evaluation of organocatalysts II, III, VIVIII, and IX in the chlorination of β-keto ester 9. Table S4. Evaluation of organocatalysts III, IV, VII, VIII, and IX in the hydroxylation of β-keto ester 9. Table S5. Evaluation of organocatalysts IV, VIII, and IX in the addition of β-keto ester 9 to tosylaziridine 14. Table S6. Evaluation of organocatalysts I, IIIV, VII, VIII, and IX in the addition of tert-butyl 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)acetate (16) to methyl acrylate (17). Table S7. Correlation between the multiplicity of the H–C(3)-endo proton (He) and the endo absolute configuration at the C-2 chiral center of compounds 1a, 3b, 5a, 7a,b, and IIIX. Table S8. Crystal data and structure refinement for compound VI-Br. Table S9. Crystal data and structure refinement for compound III.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C., U.G. and J.S.; methodology, L.C. and U.G.; software, L.C., U.G. and J.S.; validation, L.C., U.G., J.S. and M.W.; formal analysis, L.C., H.B. and M.W.; investigation, L.C., M.W. and U.G.; resources, L.C., U.G., M.W. and J.S.; data curation, L.C., U.G., J.S., H.B., M.W. and B.Š.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C. and U.G.; writing—review and editing, L.C., U.G., J.S., M.W., F.P. and B.Š.; visualization, L.C., U.G. and J.S.; supervision, U.G. and M.W.; project administration, U.G., M.W. and J.S.; funding acquisition, U.G. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency through grant P1-0179.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Helder, R.; Hummelen, J.; Laane, R.; Wiering, J.; Wynberg, H. Catalytic asymmetric induction in oxidation reactions. The synthesis of optically active epoxides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 1831–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dolling, U.H.; Davis, P.; Grabowski, E.J.J. Efficient catalytic asymmetric alkylations. 1. Enantioselective synthesis of (+)-indacrinone via chiral phase-transfer catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. O’Donnell, M.J.; Bennett, W.D.; Wu, S. The stereoselective synthesis of α-amino acids by phase-transfer catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2353–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. O’Donnell, M.J. Catalytic Asymmetric Syntheses, 2nd ed.; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 727–755. [Google Scholar]
  5. Maruoka, K. (Ed.) Asymmetric Phase Transfer Catalysis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vitale, M.R.; Oudeyer, S.; Levacher, V.; Briere, J. Radical and Ion-Pairing Strategies in Asymmetric Organocatalysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirakawa, S.; Maruoka, K. Recent developments in asymmetric phase-transfer reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4312–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Waser, M.; Winter, M.; Mairhofer, C. (Thio)urea containing chiral ammonium salt catalysts. Chem. Rec. 2023, 23, e202200198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ooi, T.; Kameda, M.; Maruoka, K. Molecular Design of a C2-Symmetric Chiral Phase-Transfer Catalyst for Practical Asymmetric Synthesis of α-Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6519–6520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ooi, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Kameda, M.; Maruoka, K. Practical catalytic enantioselective synthesis of α,α-dialkyl-α-amino acids by chiral phase-transfer catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5228–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shibuguchi, T.; Fukuta, Y.; Akachi, Y.; Sekine, A.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Development of new asymmetric two-center catalysts in phase-transfer reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9539–9543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Waser, M.; Gratzer, K.; Herchl, R.; Müller, N. Design, synthesis, and application of tartaric acid derived N-spiro quaternary ammonium salts as chiral phase-transfer catalysts. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.-Y.; Chai, Z.; Zhao, G. Novel bifunctional thiourea–ammonium salt catalysts derived from amino acids: Application to highly enantio-and diastereoselective aza-Henry reaction. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 5104–5111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, H.-Y.; Zhang, J.-X.; Cao, D.-D.; Zhao, G. Enantioselective addition of thiols to imines catalyzed by thiourea–quaternary ammonium salts. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2218–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Novacek, J.; Waser, M. Syntheses and Applications of (Thio) Urea-Containing Chiral Quaternary Ammonium Salt Catalysts. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Denmark, S.E.; Gould, N.D.; Wolf, L.M. A systematic investigation of quaternary ammonium ions as asymmetric phase-transfer catalysts. Synthesis of catalyst libraries and evaluation of catalyst activity. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4260–4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H. Chiral phase-transfer catalysts with hydrogen bond: A powerful tool in the asymmetric synthesis. Catalysts 2019, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bernal, P.; Fernández, R.; Lassaletta, J.M. Organocatalytic asymmetric cyanosilylation of nitroalkenes. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7714–7718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, B.; Liu, Y.; Sun, C.; Wei, Z.; Cao, J.; Liang, D.; Lin, Y.; Duan, H. Asymmetric phase-transfer catalysts bearing multiple hydrogen-bonding donors: Highly efficient catalysts for enantio- and diastereoselective nitro-Mannich reaction of amidosulfones. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 6432–6435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, J.; Wu, X.Y.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Sun, J. Chiral Camphor Derivatives as New Catalysts for Asymmetric Phase-Transfer Alkylation. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 19, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Money, T. Remote functionalization of camphor: Application to natural product synthesis. Org. Synth. Theory Appl. 1996, 3, 1–83. [Google Scholar]
  22. Money, T. Camphor: A chiral starting material in natural product synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1985, 2, 253–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Holton, R.A.; Somoza, C.; Kim, H.-B.; Liang, F.; Biediger, R.J.; Boatman, P.D.; Shindo, M.; Smith, C.C.; Kim, S.; Nadizadeh, H. The Total Synthesis of Paclitaxel Starting with Camphor. ACS Symp. Ser. 1995, 583, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nicolaou, K.C.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.J.; Ueno, H.; Nantermet, P.G.; Guy, R.K.; Claiborne, C.F.; Renaud, J.; Couladouros, E.A.; Paulvannan, K. Total synthesis of taxol. Nature 1994, 367, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Oppolzer, W. Camphor as a natural source of chirality in asymmetric synthesis. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kitamura, M.; Suga, S.; Kawai, K.; Noyori, R. Catalytic asymmetric induction. Highly enantioselective addition of dialkylzincs to aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6071–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahdy, A.-H.S.; Zayed, S.E.; Abo-Bakr, A.M.; Hassan, E.A. Camphor: Synthesis, reactions and uses as a potential moiety in the development of complexes and organocatalysts. Tetrahedron 2022, 121, 132913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grošelj, U. Camphor-Derivatives in Asymmetric Organocatalysis–Synthesis and Application. Curr. Org. Chem. 2015, 19, 2048–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ričko, S.; Požgan, F.; Štefane, B.; Svete, J.; Golobič, A.; Grošelj, U. Stereodivergent Synthesis of Camphor-Derived Diamines and Their Application as Thiourea Organocatalysts. Molecules 2020, 25, 2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ričko, S.; Svete, J.; Štefane, B.; Perdih, A.; Golobič, A.; Meden, A.; Grošelj, U. 1,3-Diamine-Derived Bifunctional Organocatalyst Prepared from Camphor. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 3786–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ričko, S.; Meden, A.; Ivančič, A.; Perdih, A.; Štefane, B.; Svete, J.; Grošelj, U. Organocatalyzed Deracemization of Δ2-Pyrrolin-4-ones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 2288–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, J.; Hu, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, K.-H.; Xu, C.; Niua, T. Thiourea-Catalyzed Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Keto Esters. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Novacek, J.; Monkowius, U.; Himmelsbach, M.; Waser, M. Asymmetric α-chlorination of β-ketoesters using bifunctional ammonium salt catalysis. Monatsh. Chem. 2016, 147, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mairhofer, C.; Novacek, J.; Waser, M. Synergistic Ammonium (Hypo)Iodite/Imine Catalysis for the Asymmetric α-Hydroxylation of β-Ketoesters. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 6138–6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haider, V.; Kreuzer, V.; Tiffner, M.; Spingler, B.; Waser, M. Ammonium Salt-Catalyzed Ring-Opening of Aryl-Aziridines with β-Keto Esters. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 32, 5173–5177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tiffner, M.; Novacek, J.; Busillo, A.; Gratzer, K.; Massa, A.; Waser, M. Design of chiral urea-quaternary ammonium salt hybrid catalysts for asymmetric reactions of glycine Schiff bases. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 78941–78949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. 37. In CrysAlis PRO; Agilent Technologies UK Ltd.: Oxfordshire, UK, 2011.
  38. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cristallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Macrae, C.F.; Edgington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Shields, G.P.; Taylor, R.; Towler, M.; van de Streek, J. Synthesis, Mercury: Visualization and analysis of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Spek, A.L. Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Selected efficient chiral quaternary ammonium salt phase-transfer catalysts (PTCs) and novel bifunctional camphor-based PTCs reported herein [20].
Figure 1. Selected efficient chiral quaternary ammonium salt phase-transfer catalysts (PTCs) and novel bifunctional camphor-based PTCs reported herein [20].
Molecules 28 01515 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of camphor-derived endo- 7a,b and exo-quaternary ammonium salts 8a.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of camphor-derived endo- 7a,b and exo-quaternary ammonium salts 8a.
Molecules 28 01515 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts.
Molecules 28 01515 sch002
Figure 2. Molecular structures of products III (a) and VI-Br (b). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability.
Figure 2. Molecular structures of products III (a) and VI-Br (b). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability.
Molecules 28 01515 g002
Figure 3. Stick presentation of the superimposed molecular structures of products III (blue) and VI-Br (red).
Figure 3. Stick presentation of the superimposed molecular structures of products III (blue) and VI-Br (red).
Molecules 28 01515 g003
Figure 4. The determination of stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center of compounds IX by NOESY experiments and the correlation between the multiplicity of the H–C(3)-endo proton (He) and the endo absolute configuration at the C-2 chiral center of compounds 1, 3, 5, 7, and IIIX (Supplementary Materials).
Figure 4. The determination of stereochemistry at the C-2 chiral center of compounds IX by NOESY experiments and the correlation between the multiplicity of the H–C(3)-endo proton (He) and the endo absolute configuration at the C-2 chiral center of compounds 1, 3, 5, 7, and IIIX (Supplementary Materials).
Molecules 28 01515 g004
Scheme 3. Organocatalytic activity of camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts; MTBE: methyl tert-butyl ether.
Scheme 3. Organocatalytic activity of camphor-derived phase-transfer organocatalysts; MTBE: methyl tert-butyl ether.
Molecules 28 01515 sch003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciber, L.; Požgan, F.; Brodnik, H.; Štefane, B.; Svete, J.; Waser, M.; Grošelj, U. Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Bifunctional Phase-Transfer Organocatalysts Based on Camphor. Molecules 2023, 28, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031515

AMA Style

Ciber L, Požgan F, Brodnik H, Štefane B, Svete J, Waser M, Grošelj U. Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Bifunctional Phase-Transfer Organocatalysts Based on Camphor. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciber, Luka, Franc Požgan, Helena Brodnik, Bogdan Štefane, Jurij Svete, Mario Waser, and Uroš Grošelj. 2023. "Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Bifunctional Phase-Transfer Organocatalysts Based on Camphor" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031515

APA Style

Ciber, L., Požgan, F., Brodnik, H., Štefane, B., Svete, J., Waser, M., & Grošelj, U. (2023). Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Bifunctional Phase-Transfer Organocatalysts Based on Camphor. Molecules, 28(3), 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031515

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop