Next Article in Journal
β-Cryptoxanthin Attenuates Cigarette-Smoke-Induced Lung Lesions in the Absence of Carotenoid Cleavage Enzymes (BCO1/BCO2) in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Occurrence and Characteristics of Microplastics in Wild and Farmed Shrimps Collected from Cau Hai Lagoon, Central Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Cryogen-Free Thermal Modulation-Based Enantioselective Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography for Stereo-Differentiation of Monoterpenes in Citrus spp. Leaf Oils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Morphological and Chemical Profile of Different Families of Microplastics in Samples of Breathable Air
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules28031382
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Analytical Approach to Characterize the Degradation of Different Types of Microplastics: Identification and Quantification of Released Organic Compounds

by
Giulia Giaganini
,
Mario Cifelli
,
Denise Biagini
,
Silvia Ghimenti
,
Andrea Corti
,
Valter Castelvetro
,
Valentina Domenici
* and
Tommaso Lomonaco
*
Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1382; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031382
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Microplastics and Nanoplastics Analysis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Microplastics and nanoplastics represent one of the major environmental issues nowadays due to their ubiquitous presence on Earth, and their high potential danger for living systems, ecosystems, and human life. The formation of both microplastics and nanoplastics strongly depends on both the type of pristine materials and the degradation processes related to biological and/or abiotic conditions. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of two of the most relevant abiotic parameters, namely temperature and light, taken under direct control by using a Solar box, on five types of reference polymers: high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). A multi-analytical approach was adopted to investigate in detail the first steps of plastics degradation. Samples of plastic materials at different degradation times were analyzed by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy and thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) technique. Several minor molecular species released during degradation were consistently identified by both techniques thus providing a comprehensive view of the various degradation products of these five types of microplastics.

1. Introduction

In recent years, microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) are being recognized as one of the main environmental problems due to their ubiquitous presence in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. However, to date, the actual concentration levels of both MPs and NPs and their effects on human health are still largely unknown [1]. Recent reports of the presence of MPs and NPs in the placenta [2] and bloodstream [3], if confirmed, suggest their potential toxicity and health risks for human health. It is widely accepted that plastic materials in the range of 1 μm to 5 mm are referred to as MPs, a classification typically based on the capture and detection thresholds of the adopted devices and techniques, whereas NPs have a dimension in the sub-micrometer range [4].
The reliable identification and quantification of MPs in environmental samples is a crucial step to devise a global strategy for an effective mitigation of the environmental and health impacts of these pollutants [5] as pointed out for other contaminants [6,7]. From an analytical point of view, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopies are generally used to chemically identify MPs [5], along with micro-Raman and micro-FT-IR for the analysis of smaller particles [8]. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) technique is widely employed to analyze MPs due to unique advantages that are related to the need of limited sample pre-treatment as well as high sensitivity and reproducibility levels [9]. However, the presence of interfering compounds due to biogenic material of the sample and persistent organic pollutants captured from the environment could result in misleading interpretations of the analytical data [10]. In any case, the above methodologies may not be able to provide accurate data concerning both the chemical characterization of MPs and their concentration in complex samples.
A multi-analytical approach is thus necessary to achieve a comprehensive chemical characterization of environmental and biological samples, aimed at providing information essential to evaluate the extent, distribution, and environmental impact of MPs, including their progressive degradation eventually leading to nanometric particles and low molecular weight chemical compounds. In this regard, a successful procedure allowing a polymer-specific exhaustive and accurate analysis of the total mass MPs and NPs contaminants in marine and freshwater sediments has been reported [11]. This so-called PISA (Polymer Identification and Specific Analysis) procedure, based on selective solvent extraction/fractionation (for polyolefins, polystyrene, and other vinyl polymers) followed by hydrolytic depolymerization (for condensation polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate, PET, and the two polyamides nylon 6 and nylon 6,6), along with quantification by chromatographic techniques (Py-GC/MS and size exclusion chromatography, SEC, for extractable polymers; reversed phase HPLC for depolymerization products) [12], is being further expanded into a multi-analytical platform including a range of mass spectrometer-based methods [13] and techniques (selected-ion flow tube mass spectrometry) [14], aimed not only at determining MPs and NPs in environmental matrices, but also at investigating their degradation by analyzing the chemical products released as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), especially as a result of MPs exposure to environmental photo-oxidative conditions.
High resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy of solutions and of liquid complex mixtures is a well-known analytical technique mainly used to identify chemical compounds and to elucidate the chemical structure of both molecules and macromolecules in solution. In the last three decades, quantitative NMR (qNMR) spectroscopic methods allowing the identification and quantification of chemical compounds even at low concentration in complex mixtures have been developed [15], with a significant growth of the scientific research based on qNMR in such fields as metabolomics, pharmaceutics, nutraceutics, and chemical–physical analysis of natural products [16,17]. The most common qNMR techniques are based on the detection of protons (1H) in chemical compounds, while few qNMR studies are based on 13C and 31P nuclei, due to their lower relative natural abundance [15] resulting in lower sensitivity. Quite recently, qNMR has been proposed for purity analysis as an alternative to the mass balance method [15,18,19]. Moreover, several techniques based on internal, external, or electronic referencing can be adopted reaching high analytical standards [20]. Despite the higher limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) with respect to other analytical techniques, the non-destructive character, the possibility to detect at the same time all minor components without need of separating different classes of chemical compounds, and the increased accuracy and precision of the most recent NMR instruments qualify NMR as a powerful analytical technique [15,20].
Recently, 1H NMR spectroscopic methods as well as qNMR techniques have been also applied to the study of microplastics made of polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS) [21], polyvinyl chloride (PVC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyamide (PA) [22]. These studies demonstrated that it is possible to identify and quantify each microplastic type thanks to the presence of 1H NMR signals specific to the pristine plastic material. Moreover, Peez et al. [23] showed that in the case of PET microplastics derived from different environments and subjected to various external conditions, qNMR methodologies can achieve very high analytical standards when associated with appropriate calibration and sampling procedures. It is worth noticing that other NMR techniques, such as 2D 1H NMR diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) [24], low field 1H NMR [25], and 13C multi cross polarization (CP) [26], were recently used to investigate microplastics.
Multi-analytical approaches which include NMR spectroscopic techniques [24,27] are thus expected to provide a more solid understanding of the chemical nature of microplastics, a better chemical identification of different microplastic types [21,28] and, as presented in this work, to identify minor compounds released from microplastics during degradation [29,30].
Accordingly, in this paper, we are extending our analytical platform, including 1H NMR spectroscopy to further characterize the degradation products released from different types of microplastics artificially aged inside a Solar box, with controlled temperature, humidity, and light irradiation, for a period of 1 month. Microplastics used as reference samples were made of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high density polyethylene (HDPE), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) with average dimensions from 509 μm to 857 μm. The degradation products of these five types of microplastics were monitored through 1H NMR spectroscopy and an optimized HiSorb extraction coupled to thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HiSorb-TD-GC-MS) technique for the analysis of the head space (HS). The results obtained show that the two techniques are consistent and that the information about the minor chemical compounds produced during degradation, as obtained with this multi-analytical approach, could be used as a basis for future investigations of more complex environmental samples.

2. Results

2.1. Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Polymer Materials with HiSorb-TD-GC-MS Analysis

Figure 1 shows the total ion chromatograms (TIC) acquired at t0 and after 4 weeks (4 w) of irradiation from each investigated polymer.
The head space fraction of the five aged samples (t0 + 4 w) from the different polymers, analyzed after adsorption/desorption through HiSorb coupled to TD-GC-MS, highlighted complex chromatograms with clear cases of co-elution. The deconvolution process allowed us to identify hundreds of compounds (only about 10% of the peaks) mainly belonging to ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and aromatic compounds. For all aged materials, most of the GC signals were in the second part of the chromatograms (from 30 min to 60 min) where C5–C18 compounds are generally eluted. Similar results had been observed in a previous study where Tenax-GR-based needle trap device technique has been employed to characterize the VOCs profile released from aged MPs [13]. The compounds identified from the different virgin polymers and the corresponding (t0 + 4 w) samples are listed in Table S1 Supplementary Material.
Figure 2 shows the results of the principal component analysis (PCA) concerning the HiSorb-TD-GC-MS data.
In PCA, the first principal component (PC1) and the second principal component (PC2) describe 38% of the total variance, confirming the complexity of the investigated system. From the score plot, it is possible to distinguish three clusters: (i) a first group of points in the bottom-left, (ii) a second group in the center-right, and (iii) a third group in the center. Interestingly, the first and second group belonged to PS and PP samples, whereas the third group combined the three remaining polymers (i.e., PET, HDPE, and LDPE). The loading plot allowed us to find the most important variables characterizing the PS and PP groups, suggesting the possibility to distinguish different aged polymers according to their VOCs profile. In fact, HiSorb-TD-GC-MS data suggested that degraded PS released significant amounts of the aromatic compounds acetophenone, benzaldehyde, toluene, and benzene, whereas aged PP showed acetic acid, acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-pentanone. Moreover, the occurrence of HDPE, LDPE, and PET in a single cluster close to the center of the score plot suggests a similar VOCs profile for these polymers.

2.2. H NMR Spectroscopy of Polymer Microplastics during Degradation

In this section, the main features of the 1H NMR spectra for the five types of polymer materials from the virgin sample to samples under different times of artificial photo-aging will be presented, following the order PS, PP, PET, HDPE, and LDPE.
Figure 3 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the photo-aged PS samples registered in solution.
Our results showed that PS can be completely dissolved in CDCl3, irrespective of the degradation level, by shaking the solution at 80 °C for about 30′, confirming data reported elsewhere [21]. The 1H NMR spectrum of virgin PS microplastics is characterized by two groups of structured signals between 6.3 and 7.2 ppm ascribable to the aromatic protons (2H in ortho, 2H in meta, and 1H in para positions) of the styrene moiety (see Figure 3a) and a group of broad signals centered at 1.3 and 1.8 ppm due to the CH and CH2 protons of the polymer chain, respectively. A sharper signal at 0.8 ppm is due to the CH3 terminal groups of PS, as also reported elsewhere [31]. An enlargement of the baseline put in evidence the presence of very small signals between 2.3 ppm and about 5 ppm, which can be due to oxidized groups [31] already present in the pristine PS microplastics (see Figure 3b,c). On the contrary, the spectral region above 7.5 ppm of the pristine PS microplastics does not show any signals (see Figure 3d). The effect of degradation under artificially simulated environmental conditions can be observed by comparing the enlargement of the 1H NMR spectra close to the spectral baseline at different times of irradiation (see Figure 3b–d). As it will be discussed in Section 3, some spectral changes are observed in the aliphatic region between 2.30 and 2.65 ppm (see Figure 3b); however, the most significant spectral changes are observed in the region between 7.0 and 8.5 ppm, with the appearance of structured and well-defined signals whose relative integrals increase with increasing irradiation time. These spectral variations indicate the presence of specific degradation products, partially in agreement with previous studies on environmental degradation of PS [32].
Figure 4 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the photo-aged PP samples.
The dissolution of PP in organic solvents, and thus the acquisition of 1H NMR spectra of polypropylene in solution, requires higher temperatures [33]. In our study, the acquisition of the 1H NMR spectra of the pristine PP (t0) microplastics had to be performed at 90 °C. The PP samples at different times of irradiation were more easily solubilized than PP (t0). This aspect could be related to a microstructure-dependent sensitivity to photo-oxidation. As it is shown in Figure 4a, the 1H NMR spectrum of PP (t0) contains signals typical of both isotactic and syndiotactic PP [33]. The triplet centered at 1.15 ppm is a unique characteristic of syndiotactic PP, while the signal from the CH3- group in syndiotactic PP is shifted to lower chemical shift than in isotactic PP [30]. As seen in Figure 4a, the 1H NMR spectrum of artificially aged PP (from t0 + 1 w to t0 + 4 w) contains only signals due to isotactic PP. While all degradation processes typically take place preferentially in the amorphous phase, the observed change in tacticity is in agreement with the results reported in a recent paper [34], suggesting a preferential degradation of syndiotactic PP. Another important feature concerns the appearance of several structured signals in the region between 3 ppm and 6 ppm in the spectra of PP upon aging (see Figure 4b), which are totally absent in the pristine PP (t0). As it will be discussed in Section 3, the appearance of new signals between 3 and 6 ppm, and above 7.5 ppm, as well as the changes in their relative intensity during the progress of degradation (see proton signals from ‘a’ to ‘e’ in Figure 4b) can be associated to the presence of specific degradation products or structures [35,36,37].
Figure 5 shows the solution 1H NMR spectra of the photo-aged PET samples.
PET particles, in the form of fibers, microplastics, and films, have been previously studied by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy [21,23,31,38]. In our study PET microplastics were solubilized in a CDCl3/TFA (3/1 V/V) mixture [21], and the 1H NMR spectra were acquired after 30′ at 80 °C. The observed characteristic signals of PET are an intense singlet at 8.11 ppm due to the aromatic protons (4H in the phenyl ring), an intense signal at 4.74 ppm, and a less intense signal at 4.1 ppm ascribable to the CH2 close to the ester and ether functional groups, respectively [38]. As shown in Figure 5, all photo-aged PET microplastic samples present additional small signals between 0 and 4 ppm, which can be due to the presence of CH and CH2 signals close to ketones, aldehydes, and carboxyl functional groups, as it will be discussed in Section 3. Among these proton signals, some show either an increase or a decrease in relative intensity, thus indicating changes occurring to the PET macromolecular structure as a result of photo-induced degradation [27,29,37].
Figure 6 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the photo-aged HDPE samples registered in solution.
Similar to PP, the dissolution of HDPE in organic solvents can only be achieved at high temperature. HDPE microparticles were treated with toluene-d8 at about 80 °C for more than 30′ for a complete solubilization. 1H NMR spectra of HDPE are characterized by two groups of signals: one intense signal is centered at 1.33 ppm (due to the CH2 in the chain) and one small signal is centered at 0.9 ppm (due to the terminal CH3) [39]. Signals at 2.1 ppm and at 6.95–7.10 ppm are due to the solvent (toluene-d8). In the pristine HDPE (t0), no additional signals are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum, while in the four samples analyzed after different irradiation times, several signals in the region between 3 and 6 ppm appear. As shown in Figure 6, almost all new signals (see blue circles) increase their relative intensity with increasing irradiation time.
Figure 7 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the photo-aged LDPE samples registered in solution.
The 1H NMR spectral features of LDPE are similar to those of HDPE, with the exception that the relative intensity between the signals at 0.9 ppm (CH3) and 1.33 ppm (CH2) is different in the two polymers due to the presence of chain branching in LDPE [39]. In the pristine LDPE (t0), very small signals in the 4.7–5.1 ppm and 5.6–5.7 ppm regions indicate the presence of olefines (see Figure 7), as discussed in Section 3. The spectra of the LDPE samples analyzed after different irradiation times (from t0 + 1 w to t0 + 4 w) show additional 1H NMR signals in the 2.3–2.7 ppm and 7.4–7.8 ppm regions, which increase their intensity during degradation.

3. Discussion

PDMS-HiSorb probes is a reliable absorptive extraction tool normally used to extract VOCs and SVOCs by its direct immersion in any liquid media [40]. In this work, we tested for the first time the potential advantages of this technique to analyze the HS fraction of MPs incubated for 3 h at 60 °C. The technique allowed us to extract a great number of compounds emitted from MPs during the degradation processes. Compared to the results obtained with the needle trap microextraction (NTME) technique, previously used in our lab for the analysis of the same set of aged samples [13], we observed a significant increase in the number of detected signals, highlighting the capability of HiSorb to promote the extraction of VOCs from solid samples. This is probably due to the larger sorbent phase volume of the HiSorb with respect to that packed within the needle trap device. Preliminary qualitative chemical characterization of VOCs profile released during the degradation was carried out using the Unknown™ analysis tool (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) that revealed the presence of about 1200 signals in the chromatograms of PS, PP, HDPE, and LDPE, whereas PET showed only 250 signals, probably due its greater stability to photo-oxidation processes [41]. Due to the complexity of the chromatogram, only a small portion (about 10%) of these signals was successfully identified by GC-MS analysis. Most of the compounds belonged to ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, lactones, esters, and aromatic compounds, in agreement with the results previously obtained with NTME technique [13]. PCA suggested the potential use of HS analysis to distinguish different polymers based on their VOCs profile, and to assess the associated toxicity potential. As an example, aged PS released mainly aromatic compounds such as acetophenone, benzaldehyde, toluene, and benzene, all of them with well-known toxicity.
In Section 4 of the paper, we are presenting the identification of the most significant signals in the 1H NMR spectra of the five polymer types and their possible evolution with the progress of degradation at increasing irradiation times. The identification of almost all signals was performed by comparing the experimental spectra obtained in this study with the experimental spectra of minor compounds available in open access spectra databases and in the scientific literature, and 1H NMR spectra predicted by using the simulation tool, as reported in Section 4.5.
1H NMR spectra of pristine PS (t0) and photo-aged PS (from t0 + 1 w to t0 + 4 w) are reported in Figure 3. Generally, we observed narrowed NMR signals that exclude the presence of functional groups in the macromolecular structure of the polymers. Among the minor degradation compounds identified by HiSorb-GC-MS analysis (Table S1), specific 1H NMR signals were identified for the following compounds: methyl salicylate, acetic acid, phenyl methyl ester, cinnamaldehyde (E), acetic acid phenyl ester, benzyl alcohol, and 2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde. Some of these compounds are shown in Figure 8 and some of the typical proton signals are underlined. All aromatic protons of the bicyclic benzofuran could be assigned to experimentally observed signals. Similarly, the aromatic protons benzyl alcohol and methyl salicylate are put in evidence in Figure 8 in the regions 7.30–7.45 ppm and centered at 7.55 and 7.96 ppm. In these spectral regions, several other derivatives of salicylates could be present [42]. The intensity of the aromatic signals centered at 7.47, 7.48, and 8.08 ppm increase because of degradation. None of the compounds identified by GC-MS present proton resonances at these frequencies; however, PS degradation is expected to release several additional compounds such as styrene derivatives, poly condensate aromatic systems, and benzophenone derivatives such as the chalcones [43] reported in Figure 8. The presence of compounds such as 2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde is also supported by the presence of signals in the region between 9.95 and 10.05 ppm (not shown here).
Focusing on the most intense signals among the products of degradation of PS, underlined in Figure 8 with the blue, green, and yellow braces, the ratio R = IDP/IPS between the intensity of the signals of degradation products and the intensity of the aromatic signals of PS (5H) was found to increase with increasing degradation time for all signals.
The degradation of PP under the experimental conditions described in Section 4 produced a relatively large number of low molecular weight compounds, as identified by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS analysis (see Table S1). 1H NMR spectra of PP at different times of degradation are rich with minor signals in the region between 2.7 and 6.1 ppm, as shown in Figure 4 and enlarged in Figure 9. Several 1H NMR signals are compatible with low molecular weight molecules identified by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS (Table S1), such as (R)(-)2-pentanol, acetylacetone, 1.1-ethanediol diacetate, 2-butenoic acid (E), 1-heptanol, pentanoic acid, and 1-(acetyloxy)-2-propanone. While the presence of other compounds, such as 2-pentanone and other ketones, cannot be excluded from 1H NMR spectra, their characteristic signals would be partially overlapped with those of pristine PP.
In the 1H NMR spectra of the irradiated PP samples (from t0 + 1 w to t0 + 4 w), several well-defined signals could be assigned based on the analysis of their multiplicity. For instance, the signal at 5.93 can be assigned to the CH- in position 2 of the 2-butenoic acid (E), while signals between 4.95 ppm and 5.80 ppm are due to 1-alkene and 2-alkene as the ones shown in Figure 9.
1H NMR signals due to specific products of degradation of PP are the singlets in the region between 4.65 and 4.85 ppm. As shown in Figure 9, some of these signals are ascribable to molecular species with CH- linked to the alcoholic function in 2-methyl 3-propanol derivatives, such as in isopropyl ethers or esters. The singlet at 4.68 ppm is due to CH2- of the 2-butanone acetate. Less intense and partially overlapped signals appear after 1 week of degradation in the region between 3.1 ppm and 4.2 ppm. Here, several characteristic compounds can be identified among typical products of PP degradation. For instance, the protons of CH2- linked to -OH in 3-methyl butanol resonate at 3.16 ppm (triplet) and those of the CH2- in acetyl acetone resonate at 3.56 ppm. If we look at the ratio between the intensity of these degradation products and the intensity of CH3- in pristine PP material, we cannot see significant changes between 1 w and 4 w, except for a few signals.
The analysis of the 1H NMR spectra of photo-oxidized PET is more complicated with respect to the previous polymers due to the presence of several signals in the region between 1 and 4 ppm and between 7.3 and 8.8 ppm which are present in all samples, from the pristine PET (t0) to the PET (t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w) samples (see Figure 5). Moreover, some signals do not change their intensity, such as the singlets at 2.52 ppm and at 2.31 ppm, which can be ascribed to the -CH3 of acetophenone and 2-ketones. Some proton signals decrease their intensity during degradation, such as the triplet centered at 0.87 ppm which is due to terminal CH3 in ethyl groups which can be associated with many low molecular weight species released during PET degradation. As observed also from the HiSorb-TD-GC-MS results, in the case of PET, the small number of identified molecules is also reflected in the relatively simpler 1H NMR spectra, tentatively assigned to compounds such as nonanal, octanal, butanal, and butanone derivatives, as well as several benzene derivatives as detected by GC-MS.
The 1H NMR spectra of HDPE in toluene-d8 (shown in Figure 6) present significant changes because of degradation in the 3–6 ppm region. Signals centered at 3.35–3.45 ppm are typical of methylene with a hydroxyl group (-CH2-OH). Low molecular weight alcohols were also found by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS (see 1-decanol in Table S1). The well-defined doublet (partially overlapped) signals between 4.90 and 4.99 ppm are most probably due to not equivalent CH2- ending group of alkene compounds, such as 1-pentene, and this is also in agreement with the presence of another signal (more structured) centered at 5.76 ppm, which is ascribable to the -CH- of the ethenyl group. Low molecular weight oxidized alkene derivatives such as methyl vinyl ketone were also found by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS (Table S1). A significant 1H NMR signal appearing after 2 weeks of degradation, centered at 5.45 ppm, is typical of the -CH (ethenyl group) linked to the -CH3 group as in the trans-butene or 2-cis-pentene compounds. A more quantitative spectral analysis can be performed by comparing the NMR integrals ascribable to the polymer chain, namely the signal centered at 1.33 ppm due to CH2- of the HDPE chains (IHDPE) and those of the product of degradation (IDP). As it can be seen in Figure 10, the ratio R = IDP/I HDPE increases during degradation time (from t0 to t0 + 4 w) for all signals identified and described previously. After 4 weeks of polymer degradation, the ratio R is about 0.00017 for the signal ascribable to alcohols and it reaches the value of 0.00087 for the signal due to terminal CH2- of 1-alkene (see, for instance, some representative chemical compounds in Figure 10). Knowing the amount of the pristine polymer (at t0), we roughly estimated the concentration of minor compounds in the range of 1–10 μg/mL, which is coherent with the NMR sensitivity, highlighting the potential role of 1H NMR to analyze aged polymers aimed at monitoring degradation products.
As reported in Section 2 (Figure 7), the 1H NMR spectra of LDPE (pristine sample and samples at different times of degradation) are quite similar to those recorded on HDPE. From the point of view of the degradation products, LDPE shows typical signals of terminal 1-alkene, as well as 2-alkene compounds, similarly to HDPE microplastics under degradation. As observed in Figure 11, after 4 weeks of degradation, the 1H NMR signals centered at 4.90–4.99 ppm (dominated by two doublets) and at 5.74–5.75 ppm (a multiplet) have relatively high intensities with respect to other minor signals. Moreover, they are well-defined and structured signals, in agreement with 1H NMR spectral signals of 1-pentene (and other 1-alkene compounds), as reported in the open-access NMR database (see Section 4.5). The proton signal centered at 3.4 ppm is due to methylene close to a hydroxyl group (-CH2-OH), typical of alcohols, as observed for HDPE. Moreover, additional signals can be identified whose intensity increases by increasing the degradation time. Small multiplet 1H NMR signals appear in the aromatic region, between 7.55 and 7.85 ppm, and in the aliphatic region, between 2.35 and 2.65 ppm (see Figure 7). These signals could be ascribed to benzene and toluene derivatives, such as benzoic acid, p-toluic acid/o-toluic acid, and p-toluic acid. For instance, the CH3- group linked to the aromatic ring of toluic acids usually gives rise to signals between 2.35 and 2.65 ppm. The 1H signals on the aromatic ring of toluic acids are consistent with the observed signals between 7.55 and 7.85 ppm. The appearance of a signal around 3.8 ppm after 3 weeks of LDPE degradation can be due to methyl groups of toluic acid methyl ester. If we compare the results obtained from 1H NMR spectroscopy with those obtained by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS (see Table S1), we can see that some of the compounds mentioned above were found by both techniques (i.e., alcohols, such as 1-nonanol; benzene derivatives, such as benzaldehyde; alkene derivatives, such as 6-heptenoic acid). Minor compounds, such as butanoic acid and 2(5H) furanone derivatives, found by HiSorb-TD-GC-MS, cannot be excluded from NMR. However, their characteristic 1H NMR signals are in the spectral region of the intense signals due to CH2- and CH3- groups of the pristine LDPE.
In Figure 11, the trend of the ratio R = IDP/ILDPE is reported during the degradation. Here, the value of I LDPE corresponds to the integral of the signal due to CH2- in the polymer chain of LDPE (see Figure 7). It can be noted that the ratio R (IDP/I LDPE) increases during degradation time (from t0 to t0 + 4 w) for all signals identified. In particular, the highest increase was observed for the two signals ascribable to 1-alkene degradation products, reaching the value of 0.031 for the 1H NMR signals centered at 4.90–4.99 ppm. Both values and trends of R (IDP/ILDPE) indicate that LDPE degradation is faster than HDPE, under similar experimental conditions.
The above NMR results open several possible developments. With respect to the present scientific literature [19,20,21,22,23], which was focused on the identification and quantification of different polymeric types in microplastics, either artificially prepared or found in different environments, in this work, the focus was on the chemical products of degradation. The present study demonstrates that several NMR signals can be identified and many of them can be assigned to specific chemical compounds. Moreover, as reported in the case of PS, HDPE, and LDPE materials, the trends of the intensity of NMR signals assigned to specific chemical compounds suggest that this technique is suitable to make kinetics investigations and to study the degradation mechanisms in a more quantitative way.
In conclusion, for the first time, we clearly demonstrated the potential role of 1H NMR to investigate the degradation products of PP, LDPE, HDPE, PS, and PET MPs under oxidative photodegradation conditions. The advantageous combination of two powerful techniques such as GC-MS and 1H NMR is the main novelty of this work, contributing to the improvement of the chemical characterization of such complex samples as polymers with different degradation levels, and providing useful reference data on the environmental aging of plastic debris. The determination and quantification of some of the identified compounds will be the subject of future investigations more specifically focused on the kinetics and mechanisms of degradation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Materials

Toluene-d8 (vials of 0.75 ML, 99.6% deuteration), CDCl3 (100 g bottle, 99.8% deuteration), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, spectroscopic grade, 100 mL) were purchased from Merck (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Stock liquid mixture of C5–C18 n-alkanes (pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, decane, undecane, dodecane, tridecane, pentadecane, hexadecane, heptadecane, and octadecane) was purchased from Merck (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and used to calculate Kovatz indexes, as reported elsewhere [44].

4.2. Samples and Artificial Aging Procedure

Micronized powders of PP, LDPE, HDPE, PS, and PET produced by cryogenic milling were a kind gift from Poliplast S.p.A. (Bergamo, Italy), as reported in Table 1. The average particle size of each material was determined according to ISO 565–1990 regulation.
Virgin polymeric materials were artificially aged for one month, as reported elsewhere [13]. Briefly, a Solar box RH 3000 (KEWLAB, Milan, Italy), equipped with a Xenon light source and an outdoor filter, was employed to control temperature (40 °C) and power (750 W/m2) within the ventilated irradiation chamber to simulate the environmental exposition. An aliquot (200 mg) of each aged material was collected before (time t0) and after 1 (t0 + 1 w), 2 (t0 + 2 w), 3 (t0 + 3 w), and 4 (t0 + 4 w) weeks of irradiation in the Solar box, respectively, of artificial aging. The sampled powders were stored in glass vials at −20 °C until analysis.

4.3. Samples Preparation for the NMR Analysis

Before performing 1H NMR spectroscopy, tests were carried out to identify the best solvent for each polymeric material for the subsequent NMR analysis. Toluene-d8 was used to dissolve HDPE, LDPE, and PP, whereas CDCl3 and a 3/1 V/V mixture of CDCl3 and TFA was used for PS and PET, respectively. Concentrated samples were prepared by diluting the required amount of each polymer (ranging from 10 to 14 mg) in 1 mL of solvent, as reported elsewhere [21,23]. High precision NMR tubes (Wilmad®, Vineland, NJ, USA) loaded with the sampled polymer micro powders and the corresponding solvent were heated for 30′ up to 80 °C to completely dissolve PS, LDPE, and PET, and up to 90 °C for HDPE and PP, respectively. Tubes containing HDPE and PP samples were additionally mixed by using a LP vortex mixer (Thermo Fisher Scientifics, IT, Waltham, MA, USA) and then inserted into the NMR magnet at a temperature of 80 °C. To follow the aging process, five samples for each polymer type, from t0 to t0 + 4 w, were analyzed.
A JEOL® Delta 500 spectrometer (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a 500-MHz 5-mm TH ATM probe head was used for the 1H NMR measurements. A single pulse experiment was performed for all samples using the following acquisition parameters: receiver gain optimized for each polymer type, 90° pulse width of 5.15 μs, 32 scans, acquisition time of 1.74 s, and relaxation time of 5 s. The recorded 1H NMR spectra were processed and analyzed by using the software Delta 6.0 (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). For each type of polymer, phase correction, base-line correction, and linewidth were set manually. Integrals of the characteristic signals of HDPE, LDPE, PET, PP, and PS were used to determine the relative concentration of minor chemical species released during the degradation process, as reported in Section 2 and Section 3.

4.4. Samples Preparation for the HiSorb-TD-GC-MS Analysis

An aliquot (10 mg) of each sample was placed into a 10 mL headspace vial sealed with a crimped HiSorb septum cap. A metal-core PDMS HiSorb was gently inserted into the vial through the septum. The vial was kept at 60 °C for 3 h for the extraction of VOCs released by each sample tested. The HiSorb probe was removed from the vial and then inserted into an empty TD tube for the analysis. A TD-100 multi-tube auto-sampler (Markes International, Cardiff, UK), equipped with an automated re-collection system, was employed for the thermal desorption of the PDMS probe at 250 °C for 15 min with a nitrogen flow rate of 50 mL/min. During the primary desorption (splitless mode), analytes were cryogenically trapped at 5 °C in an internal focusing trap packed with 70 mg of Tenax GR (Markes International, Cardiff, UK). The cold trap was then desorbed in split mode (split ratio of 11) at 300 °C for 20 min. The GC-MS analyses were performed using the same GC-MS instrumental settings reported elsewhere [45]. Briefly, an Agilent 7890 B Gas Chromatograph coupled with an Agilent 7010 GC-MS Triple Quad Mass Detector (Santa Clara, St. Louis, MO, USA) equipped with an Agilent DB-5 ms capillary column (60 m length, I.D. 0.25 mm, and 1 μm film thickness) (Santa Clara, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1 mL/min of He as the carrier gas was employed. The oven temperature program was 30 °C for 13 min, 4 °C/min to 130 °C (3 min hold time), and 10 °C/min to 220 °C (1 min hold time). The triple quadrupole was operated in both full scan acquiring in the range of m/z 30–300. The temperature of the transfer line, ion source, and quadrupoles were set at 260 °C, 250 °C, and 150 °C, respectively. Helium was used as the quench gas at a flow of 4 mL/min and nitrogen as the collision gas at a flow of 1.5 mL/min. HiSorb probes were conditioned under a N2 flow rate (70 mL/min) at 280 °C for 2 h.

4.5. Data Processing and Analysis

For NMR data, the identification of polymer signals was performed based on the literature [19,20,21,22,23,39,40]. The identification of minor compounds was supported by the available spectra on free NMR database (accessed on 1 December 2022. (https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/cre_index.cgi and https://hmdb.ca/spectra/nmr_one_d_search/new) and by using a 1H NMR spectra prediction tool (https://www.nmrdb.org/new_predictor/index.shtml?v=v2.138.0).
For HiSorb-TD-GC-MS data, MassHunter software (v. B.07.00, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to acquire chromatographic data and perform qualitative analysis through the Agilent UnknownTM tool. A deconvolution process was applied to computationally separate co-eluting compounds and create pure MS spectra. GC peaks with a signal-to-noise ratio higher than 10 and characterized by a NIST Mass Spectral Library (v.14) (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) match factor of at least 80% as well as a difference between the experimental and library Kovats retention index below 50 were selected for the subsequent analysis. The resulting data matrix was analyzed by R software (RStudio, Boston, MA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28031382/s1, Table S1. Compounds found at t0 and after 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w) of aging of the investigated polymers. HDPE: high density polyethylene; LDPE: low density polyethylene; PET: polyethylene terephthalate; PP: polypropylene; PS: polystyrene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D. and T.L.; methodology, V.D., T.L. and V.C.; formal analysis, G.G., M.C., D.B., S.G. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D. and T.L.; writing—review and editing, V.D., T.L. and V.C.; project administration, T.L.; funding acquisition, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the University of Pisa (PRA 2020_27 Micro e nanoplastiche: strategie innovative per limitare il problema delle particelle “invisibili”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples are available from the authors.

References

  1. Kundu, A.; Shetti, N.P.; Basu, S.; Reddy, K.R.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Identification and removal of micro- and nano-plastics: Efficient and cost-effective methods. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 129816. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ragusa, A.; Svelato, A.; Santacroce, C.; Catalano, P.; Notarstefano, V.; Carnevali, O.; Papa, F.; Rongioletti, M.C.A.; Baiocco, F.; Draghi, S.; et al. Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106274. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leslie, H.A.; van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107199. [Google Scholar]
  4. Frias, J.P.G.L.; Nash, R. Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 138, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rocha-Santos, T.; Duarte, A.C. A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of microplastics in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 65, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, S.; Cai, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Lv, K.; Chen, X. S-Scheme photocatalyst TaON/Bi2WO6 nanofibers with oxygen vacancies for efficient abatement of antibiotics and Cr(VI): Intermediate eco-toxicity analysis and mechanistic insights. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 2652–2664. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu, Y.; Tan, M.; Guo, Z.; Hao, D.; Xu, Y.; Du, H.; Zhang, C.; Guo, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q. Fabrication of wide-spectra-responsive NA/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) with boosted activity for Cr(VI) reduction and antibacterial effects. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139417. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu, J.L.; Thomas, K.V.; Luo, Z.; Gowen, A.A. FTIR and Raman imaging for microplastics analysis: State of the art, challenges and prospects. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 119, 115629. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xue, Q.; Wang, N.; Lu, J.; Bai, H. Design of a confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy system and research on microplastics detection. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 8375–8383. [Google Scholar]
  10. La Nasa, J.; Biale, G.; Fabbri, D.; Modugno, F. A review on challenges and developments of analytical pyrolysis and other thermoanalytical techniques for the quali-quantitative determination of microplastics. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2020, 149, 104841. [Google Scholar]
  11. Adhikari, S.; Kelkar, V.; Kumar, R.; Halden, R.U. Methods and challenges in the detection of microplastics and nanoplastics: A mini-review. Polym. Int. 2022, 71, 543–551. [Google Scholar]
  12. Castelvetro, V.; Corti, A.; Biale, G.; Ceccarini, A.; Degano, I.; La Nasa, J.; Lomonaco, T.; Manariti, A.; Manco, E.; Modugno, F.; et al. New methodologies for the detection, identification, and quantification of microplastics and their environmental degradation by-products. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 46764. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lomonaco, T.; Manco, E.; Corti, A.; La Nasa, J.; Ghimenti, S.; Biagini, D.; Di Francesco, F.; Modugno, F.; Ceccarini, A.; Fuoco, R.; et al. Release of harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from photo-degraded plastic debris: A neglected source of environmental pollution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 394, 122596. [Google Scholar]
  14. La Nasa, J.; Lomonaco, T.; Manco, E.; Ceccarini, A.; Fuoco, R.; Corti, A.; Modugno, F.; Castelvetro, V.; Degano, I. Plastic breeze: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by degrading macro- and microplastics analyzed by selected ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 128612. [Google Scholar]
  15. Saito, T.; Yamazaki, T.; Numata, M. Development of nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool of quantitative analysis for organic materials. Metrologia 2019, 56, 054002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bharti, S.K.; Roy, R. Quantitative 1H NMR spectroscopy. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 35, 5–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Simmler, C.; Napolitano, J.G.; McAlpine, J.B.; Chen, S.N.; Pauli, G.F. Universal quantitative NMR analysis of complex natural samples. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 25, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi, K.; Myoung, S.; Seo, Y.; Ahn, S. Quantitative NMR as a Versatile Tool for the Reference Material Preparation. Magnetochemistry 2021, 7, 15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pauli, G.F.; Chen, S.N.; Simmler, C.; Lankin, D.C.; Gödecke, T.; Jaki, B.U.; Friesen, J.B.; McAlpine, J.B.; Napolitano, J.G. Importance of purity evaluation and the potential of quantitative 1H NMR as a purity assay. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 9220–9231. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cullen, C.H.; Ray, G.J.; Szabo, C.M. A comparison of quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance methods: Internal, external, and electronic referencing. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013, 51, 705–713. [Google Scholar]
  21. Peez, N.; Janiska, M.C.; Imhof, W. The first application of quantitative 1H NMR spectroscopy as a simple and fast method of identification and quantification of microplastic particles (PE, PET, and PS). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 823–833. [Google Scholar]
  22. Peez, N.; Imhof, W. Quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy as an efficient method for identification and quantification of PVC, ABS and PA microparticles. Analyst 2020, 145, 5363–5371. [Google Scholar]
  23. Peez, N.; Becker, J.; Ehlers, S.M.; Fritz, M.; Fischer, C.B.; Koop, J.H.E.; Winkelmann, C.; Imhof, W. Quantitative analysis of PET microplastics in environmental model samples using quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy: Validation of an optimized and consistent sample clean-up method. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 7409–7418. [Google Scholar]
  24. Corti, A.; Vinciguerra, V.; Iannilli, V.; Pietrelli, L.; Manariti, A.; Bianchi, S.; Petri, A.; Cifelli, M.; Domenici, V.; Castelvetro, V. Thorough Multianalytical Characterization and Quantification of Micro- and Nanoplastics from Bracciano Lake’s Sediments. Sustainability 2020, 12, 878. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peez, N.; Rinesch, T.; Kolz, J.; Imhof, W. Applicable and cost-efficient microplastic analysis by quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy using benchtop NMR and NoD methods. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2022, 60, 172–183. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mauel, A.; Pötzschner, B.; Meides, N.; Siegel, R.; Strohriegl, P.; Senker, J. Quantification of photooxidative defects in weathered microplastics using 13C multiCP NMR spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 10875. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, U.; Gaikwad, V.; Mayyas, M.; Bucknall, M.; Sahajwalla, V. Application of High-Resolution NMR and GC-MS to Study Hydrocarbon Oils Derived from Noncatalytic Thermal Transformation of e-Waste Plastics. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 9282–9289. [Google Scholar]
  28. Garcia-Torné, M.; Abad, E.; Almeida, D.; Llorca, M.; Farré, M. Assessment of Micro-and Nanoplastic Composition (Polymers and Additives) in the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Ebro River Fishes. Molecules 2023, 28, 239. [Google Scholar]
  29. Reza Bagheri, A.; Laforsch, C.; Greiner, A.; Agarwal, S.; Bagheri, A.R.; Greiner, A.; Agarwal, S.; Laforsch, C. Fate of So-Called Biodegradable Polymers in Seawater and Freshwater. Glob. Challenges 2017, 1, 1700048. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paço, A.; Duarte, K.; da Costa, J.P.; Santos, P.S.M.; Pereira, R.; Pereira, M.E.; Freitas, A.C.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fungus Zalerion maritimum. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ceccarini, A.; Corti, A.; Erba, F.; Modugno, F.; La Nasa, J.; Bianchi, S.; Castelvetro, V. The Hidden Microplastics: New Insights and Figures from the Thorough Separation and Characterization of Microplastics and of Their Degradation Byproducts in Coastal Sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 5634–5643. [Google Scholar]
  32. Strohriegl, P.; Senker, J.; Meides, N.; Menzel, T.; Poetzschner, B.; Löder, M.G.J.; Mansfeld, U.; Altstaedt, V. Reconstructing the environmental degradation of polystyrene by accelerated weathering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 7930–7938. [Google Scholar]
  33. Busico, V.; Cipullo, R. Microstructure of polypropylene. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 443–533. [Google Scholar]
  34. Iedema, P.D.; Remerie, K.; Seegers, D.; McAuley, K.B. Tacticity Changes during Controlled Degradation of Polypropylene. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 8921–8935. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, P.; Qian, L.; Wang, H.; Zhan, X.; Lu, K.; Gu, C.; Gao, S. New Insights into the Aging Behavior of Microplastics Accelerated by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3579–3588. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chamas, A.; Moon, H.; Zheng, J.; Qiu, Y.; Tabassum, T.; Jang, J.H.; Abu-Omar, M.; Scott, S.L.; Suh, S. Degradation Rates of Plastics in the Environment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 3494–3511. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, K.; Hamidian, A.H.; Tubić, A.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.K.H.; Wu, C.; Lam, P.K.S. Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 274, 116554. [Google Scholar]
  38. Martínez De Ilarduya, A.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Chemical Structure and Microstructure of Poly(alkylene terephthalate)s, their Copolyesters, and their Blends as Studied by NMR. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 2138–2160. [Google Scholar]
  39. Brandolini, A.J.; Hills, D.D. NMR Spectra of Polymers and Polymer Additives. In NMR Spectra of Polymers and Polymer Additives; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cheng, Z.; Mannion, D.T.; O’sullivan, M.G.; Miao, S.; Kerry, J.P.; Kilcawley, K.N. Comparison of Automated Extraction Techniques for Volatile Analysis of Whole Milk Powder. Foods 2021, 10, 2061. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jabarin, S.A.; Lofgren, E.A. Thermal stability of polyethylene terephthalate. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1984, 24, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar]
  42. Takac, M.J.-M.; Topic, V.D. FT-IR and NMR spectroscopic studies of salicylic acid derivatives. II. Comparison of 2-hydroxy-and 2,4-and 2,5-dihydroxy derivatives. Acta Pharm. 2004, 54, 177–191. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gehman, C.A.; Hantz, E.R.; Hamann, C.S. Distinguishing Vinylic and Aromatic 1H NMR Signals Using Selectively Deuterated Chalcones. J. Chem. Educ. 2021, 98, 2323–2332. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mc Naught, A.D.; Wilkinson, A. Compendium of Chemical Terminology. In The Gold Book; Iupac: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2012; p. 1670. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lomonaco, T.; Salvo, P.; Ghimenti, S.; Biagini, D.; Vivaldi, F.; Bonini, A.; Fuoco, R.; Di Francesco, F. Stability of volatile organic compounds in sorbent tubes following SARS-CoV-2 inactivation procedures. J. Breath Res. 2021, 15, 037102. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 28 01382 g001 550
Figure 1. Total ion chromatograms of (a) PET (t0); (b) PET (t0 + 4 w); (c) HDPE (t0); (d) HDPE (t0 + 4 w); (e) LDPE (t0); (f) LDPE (t0 + 4 w); (g) PP (t0); (h) PP (t0 + 4 w); (i) PS (t0); and (l) PS (t0 + 4 w).
Figure 1. Total ion chromatograms of (a) PET (t0); (b) PET (t0 + 4 w); (c) HDPE (t0); (d) HDPE (t0 + 4 w); (e) LDPE (t0); (f) LDPE (t0 + 4 w); (g) PP (t0); (h) PP (t0 + 4 w); (i) PS (t0); and (l) PS (t0 + 4 w).
Molecules 28 01382 g001
Molecules 28 01382 g002 550
Figure 2. Principal component analysis of HiSorb-GC-MS data: (a) score plot and (b) loading plot.
Figure 2. Principal component analysis of HiSorb-GC-MS data: (a) score plot and (b) loading plot.
Molecules 28 01382 g002
Molecules 28 01382 g003a 550Molecules 28 01382 g003b 550
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of PS microplastics during degradation. (a) 1H NMR spectrum of the pristine PS microplastics. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PS microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, in the spectral regions between 2.1 and 3.6 ppm (b), between 3.5 and 5 ppm (c), and between 7.0 and 8.5 ppm (d). Spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic signal centered at 7.1 ppm. Stars signals are referred to solvent used for the 1H NMR analysis.
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of PS microplastics during degradation. (a) 1H NMR spectrum of the pristine PS microplastics. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PS microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, in the spectral regions between 2.1 and 3.6 ppm (b), between 3.5 and 5 ppm (c), and between 7.0 and 8.5 ppm (d). Spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic signal centered at 7.1 ppm. Stars signals are referred to solvent used for the 1H NMR analysis.
Molecules 28 01382 g003aMolecules 28 01382 g003b
Molecules 28 01382 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) 1H NMR spectra of the pristine PP microplastics (t0) and after 1 week of irradiation (t0 + 1 w). (b) Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PP microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline to see the presence of small signals. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal between 0.85 and 1.0 ppm (due to the CH3 in the PP). Note that the signals around 7 ppm and 2.3 ppm are due to the deuterated solvent (toluene-d8).
Figure 4. (a) 1H NMR spectra of the pristine PP microplastics (t0) and after 1 week of irradiation (t0 + 1 w). (b) Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PP microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline to see the presence of small signals. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal between 0.85 and 1.0 ppm (due to the CH3 in the PP). Note that the signals around 7 ppm and 2.3 ppm are due to the deuterated solvent (toluene-d8).
Molecules 28 01382 g004
Molecules 28 01382 g005 550
Figure 5. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PET microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the region between 0.6 and 4.3 ppm. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic signal centered at 8.11 ppm due to the aromatic moiety of PET. Dark arrows indicate the most significant signals appearing or disappearing as a result of degradation.
Figure 5. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the PET microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the region between 0.6 and 4.3 ppm. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aromatic signal centered at 8.11 ppm due to the aromatic moiety of PET. Dark arrows indicate the most significant signals appearing or disappearing as a result of degradation.
Molecules 28 01382 g005
Molecules 28 01382 g006 550
Figure 6. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the HDPE microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the region between 2.0 and 7.0 ppm. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal centered at 1.3 ppm, due to the CH2 moiety of the HDPE chain. Blue circles indicate the most significant signals appearing as a result of degradation, as discussed in Section 3.
Figure 6. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the HDPE microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the region between 2.0 and 7.0 ppm. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal centered at 1.3 ppm, due to the CH2 moiety of the HDPE chain. Blue circles indicate the most significant signals appearing as a result of degradation, as discussed in Section 3.
Molecules 28 01382 g006
Molecules 28 01382 g007 550
Figure 7. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the LDPE microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the whole proton spectral region. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal centered at 1.3 ppm, due to the CH2 moiety of the LDPE chain. Dark arrows indicate the most significant signals appearing as a result of degradation, while asterisks (*) show anomalous signals in some of the analyzed microplastics.
Figure 7. Stackplot of the 1H NMR spectra of the LDPE microplastics at different times of irradiation (from bottom to top): t0, t0 + 1 w, t0 + 2 w, t0 + 3 w, and t0 + 4 w, enlarged at the spectral baseline in the whole proton spectral region. Spectra were normalized with respect to the aliphatic signal centered at 1.3 ppm, due to the CH2 moiety of the LDPE chain. Dark arrows indicate the most significant signals appearing as a result of degradation, while asterisks (*) show anomalous signals in some of the analyzed microplastics.
Molecules 28 01382 g007
Molecules 28 01382 g008 550
Figure 8. Enlargement of the 1H NMR spectra of pristine PS (t0) and PS after 1 w, 2 w, 3 w, and 4 w of degradation, from 7.2 to 8.5 ppm. Main 1H NMR aromatic signals have been assigned to compounds, whose molecular structure is shown. Hypothetical compounds are also reported as described in the text. The correspondence between each signal and the proton/protons on the molecular sketches is put in evidence through colored symbols. On the top left, the ratio R between the integral of the aromatic signals of PS (IPS) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w) for three more significant signals, as indicated by the colored braces on top of the 1H NMR spectra.
Figure 8. Enlargement of the 1H NMR spectra of pristine PS (t0) and PS after 1 w, 2 w, 3 w, and 4 w of degradation, from 7.2 to 8.5 ppm. Main 1H NMR aromatic signals have been assigned to compounds, whose molecular structure is shown. Hypothetical compounds are also reported as described in the text. The correspondence between each signal and the proton/protons on the molecular sketches is put in evidence through colored symbols. On the top left, the ratio R between the integral of the aromatic signals of PS (IPS) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w) for three more significant signals, as indicated by the colored braces on top of the 1H NMR spectra.
Molecules 28 01382 g008
Molecules 28 01382 g009 550
Figure 9. Enlargement of the 1H NMR spectra of PP after 1 w, 2 w, 3 w, and 4 w of irradiation, from 2.8 to 6.1 ppm. The main 1H NMR signals and the corresponding assignments to compounds with the given molecular structure are shown. The correspondence between each signal and the proton/protons on the molecular sketches is put in evidence through colored circles. See the text for further explanations.
Figure 9. Enlargement of the 1H NMR spectra of PP after 1 w, 2 w, 3 w, and 4 w of irradiation, from 2.8 to 6.1 ppm. The main 1H NMR signals and the corresponding assignments to compounds with the given molecular structure are shown. The correspondence between each signal and the proton/protons on the molecular sketches is put in evidence through colored circles. See the text for further explanations.
Molecules 28 01382 g009
Molecules 28 01382 g010 550
Figure 10. On the left, trends of the ratio R between the integral of the CH2- signals of HDPE (IHDPE) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w). Four most significant signals have been selected, ascribable to alkene and alcohol products of degradation. On the right, molecular structure of representative molecules and proton signals under observation, as identified from 1H NMR.
Figure 10. On the left, trends of the ratio R between the integral of the CH2- signals of HDPE (IHDPE) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w). Four most significant signals have been selected, ascribable to alkene and alcohol products of degradation. On the right, molecular structure of representative molecules and proton signals under observation, as identified from 1H NMR.
Molecules 28 01382 g010
Molecules 28 01382 g011 550
Figure 11. 1H NMR spectra of the LDPE in the region between 2.4 ppm and 6.7 ppm. Signals ascribable to 1-alkene (such as 1-pentene, see the molecular sketch on the top) are marked with colored circles. Trends of the ratio R between the integral of the CH2- signals of LDPE (ILDPE) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w), are reported on the right. Four most significant signals have been selected, ascribable to alkene and alcohol compounds. The large signals in the spectrum at t0 + 4 w (marked with a star) are due to water.
Figure 11. 1H NMR spectra of the LDPE in the region between 2.4 ppm and 6.7 ppm. Signals ascribable to 1-alkene (such as 1-pentene, see the molecular sketch on the top) are marked with colored circles. Trends of the ratio R between the integral of the CH2- signals of LDPE (ILDPE) and the integral of the signals of degradation products (IDP), during the degradation time, from 0 (t0) to 4 weeks (t0 + 4 w), are reported on the right. Four most significant signals have been selected, ascribable to alkene and alcohol compounds. The large signals in the spectrum at t0 + 4 w (marked with a star) are due to water.
Molecules 28 01382 g011
Table
Table 1. Pristine plastic materials used in the present study, density, and average dimension of the plastic samples.
Table 1. Pristine plastic materials used in the present study, density, and average dimension of the plastic samples.
Plastic MaterialDensity
(g/cm3)		Average Dimension of
Plastic Samples (μm)
Low density polyethylene (LDPE)0.917632
High density polyethylene (HDPE)0.952622
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
(About 5% crystallinity as provided)		1.28509
Polypropylene (PP)0.900857
Polystyrene (PS)1.05564
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giaganini, G.; Cifelli, M.; Biagini, D.; Ghimenti, S.; Corti, A.; Castelvetro, V.; Domenici, V.; Lomonaco, T. Multi-Analytical Approach to Characterize the Degradation of Different Types of Microplastics: Identification and Quantification of Released Organic Compounds. Molecules 2023, 28, 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031382

AMA Style

Giaganini G, Cifelli M, Biagini D, Ghimenti S, Corti A, Castelvetro V, Domenici V, Lomonaco T. Multi-Analytical Approach to Characterize the Degradation of Different Types of Microplastics: Identification and Quantification of Released Organic Compounds. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giaganini, Giulia, Mario Cifelli, Denise Biagini, Silvia Ghimenti, Andrea Corti, Valter Castelvetro, Valentina Domenici, and Tommaso Lomonaco. 2023. "Multi-Analytical Approach to Characterize the Degradation of Different Types of Microplastics: Identification and Quantification of Released Organic Compounds" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031382

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop