Next Article in Journal
Excited State Kinetics of Benzo[a]pyrene Is Affected by Oxygen and DNA
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Applications of Supramolecular Flame Retardants: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Synergistic Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) and Kaempferol
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Flame-Retardant Additives DDM-DOPO and Graphene on Flame Propagation over Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Resin under the Influence of External Thermal Radiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Functionally Active Microheterogeneous Systems for Elastomer Fire- and Heat-Protective Materials

by
Victor F. Kablov
1,
Oksana M. Novopoltseva
1,
Daria A. Kryukova
1,2,
Natalia A. Keibal
1,
Vladimir Burmistrov
2 and
Vladimir G. Kochetkov
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical Technology of Polymers and Industrial Ecology, Volzhsky Polytechnic Institute (Branch) of Volgograd State Technical University, 42a Engelsa st., Volzhsky 404121, Russia
2
Department of Organic Chemistry, Volgograd State Technical University, 28 Lenina Avenue, Volgograd 400005, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(13), 5267; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135267
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023

Abstract

:
Elastomeric materials are utilized for the short-term protection of products and structures operating under extreme conditions in the aerospace, marine, and oil and gas industries. This research aims to study the influence of functionally active structures on the physical, mechanical, thermophysical, and fire- and heat-protective characteristics of elastomer compositions. The physical and mechanical properties of elastomer samples were determined using Shimazu AG-Xplus, while morphological research into microheterogeneous systems and coke structures was carried out on a scanning electronic microscope, Versa 3D. Differential thermal and thermogravimetric analyses of the samples were conducted on derivatograph Q-1500D. The presence of aluminosilicate microspheres, carbon microfibers, and a phosphor–nitrogen–organic modifier as part of the aforementioned structures contributes to the appearance of a synergetic effect, which results in an increase in the heat-protective properties of a material due to the enhancement in coke strength and intensification of material carbonization processes. The results indicate an 8–17% increase in the heating time of the unheated surface of a sample and a decrease in its linear burning speed by 6–17% compared to known analogues. In conclusion, microspheres compensate for the negative impact of microfibers on the density and thermal conductivity of a composition.

1. Introduction

The development of elastomer materials based on ethylene–propylene–diene rubber that can withstand high-temperature heat flows in a short amount of time is crucial for protecting structures in industries such as aerospace, rocket, and oil and gas [1,2]. These materials can be used as coatings for fire and heat protection in combustion chambers, nozzles of solid-propellant rocket engines, gas generator covers, and other applications.
Advancements in creating fire-resistant polymer materials have been explored by Walter, Bhuvaneswari, and Ahmed [3,4,5]. The effectiveness of elastomeric fire- and heat-protective materials (FHPMs) largely depends on a complex set of endothermic physical and chemical transformations of components and their thermal destruction, as well as changes in the material’s chemical structure, such as intumescence, pore formation, and carbonization [6,7].
Intensive thermal impact on FHPMs initiates structurization and carbonization processes that lead to the formation of a protective layer with low thermal conductivity [6,7]. In most heat-protective compositions, non-organic fillers act as elements on which primary carbon appears and then coke deposits as a result of thermal decomposition. Introducing phosphorus-, boron-, or nitrogen-containing components can intensify carbonization processes. Microspheres can also be introduced to create a uniform, fine porous structure of the coke layer [7,8,9].
One challenge faced in FHPMs is the thinning of the material due to high-speed gas flow, which leads to a decrease in efficiency under operational conditions. This challenge can be solved by using microfiber fillers such as kaolin, basalt, carbon, and other fibers. However, introducing such fillers is associated with technical difficulties such as agglomeration and an increase in density and thermal conductivity. Various coupling agents can be used to improve the distribution of microfibers and enhance the interaction at the polymer–microfiber interface. A phosphorus-nitrogen-containing modifier (DDF) has been shown to have a positive impact on physical and mechanical, fire- and heat-protective, and thermophysical properties of a composition [10].
Research has shown that phosphorus-containing additives can inhibit flames by increasing the recombination speed of H+ and OH and reactions with phosphorus oxides and oxyacids [11,12,13]. In the condensed phase, residues of phosphoric acid are formed, which act as a dehydrating agent, enabling the formation of carbonized structures. Phosphorus compounds and their degradation products can also act as cross-linking agents, causing dehydration, cyclization, ligation, aromatization, and graphitization [14,15,16].
Microcapsulated phosphorus can also be used as a modifying agent, increasing fire resistance in epoxipolymers without affecting physical and mechanical or dielectric parameters [16].
Under operating conditions, fire- and heat-resistant materials are exposed not only to elevated temperatures and pressure but also to high-speed gas flow. This leads to the removal of the upper layer of the material, thinning the material itself and decreasing its efficiency. This issue can be resolved by incorporating microfiber fillers that form a “network” to increase the erosion resistance of the material. Examples of such fillers include kaolin, basalt, carbon, and other fibers. The introduction of these fillers into polymers involves various interactions at the polymer–filler interface that affect the mechanical, physicochemical properties, and thermooxidative stability of the composite material [17,18,19,20,21].
However, the introduction of such fillers comes with a number of technological difficulties. Fibers, especially asbestos, tend to agglomerate, which reduces the homogeneity of the material. Additionally, there is an increase in the density and thermal conductivity of the material, which is unacceptable in some cases.
To improve the distribution of microfibers and enhance the interaction at the polymer–microfiber interface, various finishes can be used. One criterion for selecting a sizing system is its positive effect on not only the physical and mechanical properties but also on the fire and heat protection and thermophysical properties of the composition. As our study has shown, the DDP modifier (dimethylcarbamyl(diaminomethyl)phosphoramide) synthesized by us can be such a system.
To compensate for the negative effect of microfibers on density and thermal conductivity, their combination with microspheres is possible [22,23,24,25,26]. By selecting sizing systems and varying the ratio of microspheres and microfibers, it is possible to obtain in situ organizing structures that combine the advantages of both components. The efficiency of fire- and heat-resistant elastomeric materials is primarily determined by a complex set of endothermic physical and chemical transformations of the components, as well as their thermal degradation. Additionally, the material’s chemical structure undergoes changes such as swelling, pore formation, and coking. Under high-temperature conditions, these processes are initiated, leading to the formation of a protective layer with low thermal conductivity through coke formation and structuring [25,26,27,28,29].

2. Results

Depending on the proportions of microspheres and microfibers used, we anticipated the formation of various functionally active structures. Table 1 outlines the proportions of microspheres, microfibers, and DDF that were studied (Supplementary Materials). Scanning electronic microscopy revealed the formation of three distinct types of structures (as depicted in Figure 1), indicating the modification of the surface of the microdispersed components through the appearance of phosphorus atom peaks in the elementograms.
As illustrated in the microphotograph (Figure 2), the introduced functionally active structures (FASs) retain their integrity. The existing intermediate variants in the form of treated microspheres or microfibers also positively influence the fire and heat protection characteristics of the material: the heating time of the unheated surface of a sample up to 100 °C increases to 5.5–7.5%; the linear burning speed decreases to 4.3–6.7%.
Table 2 presents the properties of vulcanized samples of the elastomeric compositions under study.

3. Discussion

The introduction of functionally active components, which form relatively large microstructures, results in a certain decrease in the strength characteristics. However, their values still remain higher than the standard ones (Table 2). More importantly, the density of the compositions decreases with an increase in the content of microspheres and approaches the control variant. A decrease in this parameter is crucial for creating protective materials for aircraft and rocketry.
Previous studies [10,30] have demonstrated that the optimal balance between fire and heat protection and the physical and mechanical properties of the material can be achieved by incorporating 5–15 mass parts of microfibers and 3–7 mass parts of microspheres.
Samples containing FASs with a ratio of microspheres/microfibers = 5:10 exhibit the most efficient fire and heat protection characteristics. When heat flow passes through the thickness of a fire- and heat-protective material, a number of adaptive processes occur: the destruction of the polymer matrix occurs in the upper layers of the material, and the pre-introduced functionally active components enable the formation of a denser fine porous coke layer (Figure 3), which is reinforced with microfibers. In the deeper levels of the material, carbonization processes are initiated owing to the presence of a phosphorus–boron–organic modifier on the surface of the microspheres. These processes enable a decrease in the heating-up speed.
The efficiency of the additives researched is confirmed with the DTA and TG analysis methods (Supplementary Materials). The value of the energy consumed for the structurization processes, carbonization of the material, degradation, and chemical transformation of the modifier under the impact of a heat flow can be evaluated by the square of the endothermic peak on the DTA curve. When FASs are introduced, an increase in the carbon residue occurs at 4–30% and a growth in the square of the endothermic peak takes place at 24%.
The studied samples are shown in Figure 4 after being tested for erosion strength under conditions of high-speed heat flow. The control sample (Figure 4b) is characterized by greater weight loss and little start time of combustion. The presence of FASs intensifies the carbonization processes and the microfibers enable the creation of strong coke with low thermal conductivity (Figure 4e).
The experimental data obtained have allowed us to propose a mechanism for the fire- and heat-protective action of materials containing functionally active structures (as depicted in Figure 5). The introduced functionally active components are transformed into a reinforced coke layer with increased strength against erosion carry-over and decreased thermal conductivity under the impact of high-temperature heat flow. In this case, the microspheres act as carbonization centers, while a layer of DDF on their surface initiates this process and retains the microfibers necessary to enhance the coke strength under the conditions of material erosion carry-over.
When subjected to high-temperature impact in the carbonization area, fusion and destruction of the microspheres occur. However, microfibers remain even on the surface of the shards (Figure 6), continuing to perform their function of reinforcing the coke.

4. Materials and Methods

Materials

The materials under investigation were rubbers based on triple ethylene–propylene–diene rubber (EPDM-40), manufactured by the Nizhnekamsk Synthetic Rubber Factory. This particular rubber was selected for its relatively low density and unsaturation degree, as well as its high heat resistance [31].
The compositions being studied are listed in Table 3, with previous works [7,10] determining the optimal weight content of microspheres, microfibers, and an organic element modifier at 5, 10, and 1 wt pts., respectively, per 100 wt pts of rubber.
Elastomer compositions without functionally active additives were used as control samples. The properties of compositions containing single components of functionally active structures were previously studied by our team [30,32].
The rubber mixes were prepared in two stages, using a high-speed laboratory micromixer of the “Brabender” type (Polimermash, Saint Petersburg, Russia) for the first stage. A calculated amount of the functionally active modifier was added to the compounded masterbatch at a temperature of 105–110 °C and homogenized. In the second stage, sulfur, vulcanization accelerators, and activators were added on laboratory rollers (Polimermash, Saint Petersburg, Russia) at a temperature of 45–50 °C after a 24 h rest. Vulcanization of the samples was then performed in a PHG-2 212/4 vulcanizing press (Carver, Aldridge, Hungary) under the optimum mode determined using a flow meter MDR 3000 Professional (MonTech, Columbia City, IN, USA) (165 °C, 40 min.).
The physical and mechanical properties of standard elastomer samples were determined using a tearing machine Shimazu AG-Xplus 1.0 kN (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in accordance with ISO 37-2017 [33]. To evaluate the fire and heat resistance of the samples, the temperature dependence on the unheated surface of the sample from the time of open plasma torch fire impact, the loss of sample weight, and the linear burning speed were determined according to a developed procedure. The sample used was a disc with a diameter of 100 mm and thickness of 10 mm. High-temperature heating created a temperature around 2000 °C on the surface of the sample.
To evaluate the erosion strength of the material under high-temperature conditions, a sample was placed on a rotating shaft and tangentially heated by a plasma torch. The start time of combustion and coke detachment were recorded during the test, followed by the determination of the sample diameter after the test. The disrupted layer was removed, and the thickness of the non-disrupted layer was determined.
The strength characteristics of the coke were determined by considering the tear-off forces realized on the interface between the coke layer and non-degraded material during the tear-off of the coke layer under the impact of centrifugal forces when a cylindrical sample was rotated at a constant speed during high-temperature heating in a plasma torch flame. The tear propagation strength of the carbonized layer was determined using Formula (1):
σ = 2 · π · ω 2 · R 0 2 R 2 · ρ Κ R 0 R 2
where ω—angular velocity, rps; R0—initial radius, mm; R—radius before the boundary of the pyrolysis layer, along which the tear-off occurs, and mm; ρk—coke density, kg·m−3.
The preassembly of a functionally active structure was carried out by treating the surface of the microspheres and microfibers with a 5% aqueous solution of DDF (Figure 7), followed by drying until constant weight.
Morphological research of the FAS, vulcanized stocks, and coke structures was carried out on the scanning electronic microscope Versa 3D (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Differential thermal and thermogravimetric analyses of the samples were carried out on a derivatograph Q-1500D (MOM Szerviz Kft, Budapest, Hungary).

5. Conclusions

The results indicate that incorporating pre-assembled functionally active systems into the composition of elastomeric fire- and heat-protective materials enhances their interaction with the elastomeric matrix, resulting in better distribution. This targeted delivery of the modifier into the interphase layer enhances the coke formation processes at the interface. The combined introduction of microspheres and microfibers during initiated coke formation creates structures where microfibers are grouped around the microspheres, reinforcing the coke layer and increasing its erosion resistance. Morphological analysis of the FAS, vulcanized stocks, and coke structures was conducted using the scanning electronic microscope Versa 3D. Differential thermal and thermogravimetric analyses of the samples were carried out using a derivatograph Q-1500D.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28135267/s1. Raw data of DTA and TG analyzes of the studied samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.F.K. and V.G.K.; formal analysis, O.M.N. and N.A.K.; investigation, D.A.K. and V.B.; methodology, O.M.N.; writing—original draft, V.B. and V.G.K.; writing—review and editing, V.B. and V.G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FZUS-2021-0013 and Scholarship of the President of the Russian Federation to young scientists and Postgraduates (SP-1507.2022.1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not available.

References

  1. Zaikov, G.E.; Kalugina, E.V.; Gumargalieva, K.Z. Fundamental Regularities of Thermal Oxidation of Heat-Resistant Heterochain Polymers—Thermal Stability of Engineering Heterochain Thermoresistant Polymers; Utrecht: Boston, MA, USA, 2004; pp. 15–57. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mikhailin, Y.A. Structural Polymeric Composite Materials; Nauka: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2010; pp. 25–67. [Google Scholar]
  3. Walter, M.D.; Wajer, M.T. Overveiw of Flame Retardants Including Magnesium Hydroxine; Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties LLC: Nottingham, MD, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhuvaneswari, C.M.; Surehkumar, M.S.; Kakade, S.D. Manoj Gupta Ethylene-propylene Diene Rubber as a Futuristic Elastomer for Insulation of Solid Rocket Motors. Def. Sci. J. 2006, 56, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ahmed, A.F.; Hoa, S.V. Thermal insulation by heat resistant polymers for solid rocket motor insulation. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 1544–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mariappan, T. Fire Retardant Coatings. In New Technologies in Protective Coatings; BoD—Books on Demand: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kablov, V.F.; Novopoltseva, O.M.; Kochetkov, V.G.; Lapina, A.G.; Pudovkin, V.V. Elastomer heat-shielding materials containing aluminosilicate microspheres. Russ. Eng. Res. 2017, 37, 1059–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Markowski, J. Cenospheres. Anuniversal construction material. Przem. Chem. 2019, 98, 940–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bezzaponnaya, O.V.; Golovina, E.V. Effect of mineral fillers on the heat resistance and combustibility of an intumescent fire proofing formulation on silicone base. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2018, 91, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kablov, V.F.; Keibal, N.A.; Kochetkov, V.G.; Motchenko, A.O.; Antonov, Y.M. Research of the influence of carbon microfiber on the properties of elastomer fire-protective materials. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2018, 91, 1160–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jang, B.N.; Wilkie, C.A. The effects of triphenylphosphate and recorcinolhis on the thermal degradation of polycarbonate in air. Thermochim. Acta 2005, 433, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xiao, J.; Hu, Y.; Yang, L.; Cai, Y.; Song, L.; Chen, Z.; Fan, W. Fire retardant synergism between melamine and triphenyl phosphate in poly(butylene terephthalate). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pawlowski, K.H.; Schartel, B.; Fichera, M.A.; Jager, C. Flame Retardancy Mechanisms of Bisphenol a- Bis(diphenyl phosphate) in Combination with Zinc Borate in Bisphenol a-Polycarbonate/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Blends. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 49, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kashiwagi, T. Flame Retardant Mechanism of the Nanotubes-Based Nanocomposites; Final Report. NIST GCR 07-912; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2007; p. 65. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourbigot, S.; Le Bras, M. Flame Retardant Plastics. In Plastics Flammability Handbook; Manser: Munich, Germany, 2004; Volume 5, pp. 133–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Beach, M.W.; Rondan, N.G.; Froese, R.D.; Gerhart, B.B.; Green, J.G.; Stobby, B.G.; Shmakov, A.G.; Shvartsberg, V.M.; Korobeinichev, O.P. Studies of degradation enhancement of polystyrene by flame retardant additives. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2008, 9, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koo, J.H. Polymer Nanocomposites: Processing, Characterization, and Applications; McGraw-Hill Professional: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 159–176. [Google Scholar]
  18. Koo, J.H.; Miller, M.J.; Weispfenning, J.; Blackmon, C. Silicone polymer composites for thermal protection system: Fiber reinforcements and microstructures. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 45, 1363–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Hu, B.; Hui, K.; Li, K.; Wang, L. Erosion resistance of ethylene propylene diene monomer insulations reinforced with precoated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Astronaut. 2022, 198, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Saleh, M.H.; Sundararaj, U. Review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/polymer composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 2126–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rybiński, P.; Syrek, B.; Marzec, A.; Szadkowski, B.; Kuśmierek, M.; Śliwka-Kaszyńska, M.; Mirkhodjaev, U.Z. Effects of Basalt and Carbon Fillers on Fire Hazard, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of EPDM Rubber Composites. Materials 2021, 14, 5245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raask, E. Cenospheres in pulverized fuel ash. J. Inst. Fuel 1968, 43, 339–344. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rose, N.L. Inorganie flu-ash spheres as pollution. Trasers Environ. Pollut. 1996, 91, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pandey, G.S.; Gain, V.K. Cenosphere-load in coal ash diseharge ofthermal power plant. Res. Ind. 1993, 38, 99–100. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Su, H.; Li, C.; Fan, W.; Jing, X. Enhanced thermal resistance and ablation properties of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer rubber with boron-containing phenolic resins. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 170, 105136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, M.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Effects of carbon nanotubes on char structure and heat transfer in ethylene propylene diene monomer composites at high temperature. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 211, 108852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, H.; Yang, Y.; Ge, X. Effect of various fibers on the ablation resistance of poly(diaryloxyphosphazene) elastomer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Iqbal, N.; Sagar, S.; Khan, M.B.; Rafique, H.M. Elastomeric ablative nanocomposites used in hyperthermal environments. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tate, J.S.; Gaikwad, S.; Theodoropoulou, N.; Trevino, E.; Koo, J.H. Carbon/phenolic nanocomposites as advanced thermal protection material in aerospace applications. J. Compos. 2013, 2013, 403656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kablov, V.F.; Novopol’tseva, O.M.; Kochetkov, V.G.; Pudovkin, V.V. Physicomechanical, thermal, and flame-retardant properties of elastomer compounds based on ethylene–propylene–diene rubber and filled with hollow aluminosilicate microspheres. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2017, 90, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ravishankar, P.S. Treatise on EPDM. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2012, 85, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kablov, V.F.; Bondarenko, S.N.; Vasilkova, L.A. Properties of fire-retardant coating. Nov. Mater. 2013, 5, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  33. ISO Standard 37-2013; Rubber, Vulcanized or Thermoplastic; Determination of Tensile Stress-Strain Properties. Standartinform Publ.: Moscow, Russia, 2014; p. 32.
  34. Kablov, V.F.; Kochetkov, V.G.; Keibal, N.A.; Novopol’tseva, O.M.; Kryukova, D.A. Modifier Based on Dicyandiamide and Dimethyl Phosphite for Fire and Heat Resistant Elastomer Materials. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2022, 95, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of the assembly of functionally active structures and SEM microphotos thereof (magnification× 10,000).
Figure 1. Diagram of the assembly of functionally active structures and SEM microphotos thereof (magnification× 10,000).
Molecules 28 05267 g001
Figure 2. SEM microphotograph of vulcanized stock 10MUV: 5MSF (magnification× 10,000).
Figure 2. SEM microphotograph of vulcanized stock 10MUV: 5MSF (magnification× 10,000).
Molecules 28 05267 g002
Figure 3. Pore distribution in the pre-pyrolysis layer: 1—control sample; 2—5MUV:10MSF; 3—10MUV:5MSF; 4—15MUV:5MSF.
Figure 3. Pore distribution in the pre-pyrolysis layer: 1—control sample; 2—5MUV:10MSF; 3—10MUV:5MSF; 4—15MUV:5MSF.
Molecules 28 05267 g003
Figure 4. The appearance of the sample surface under the impact of high-speed heat flow: (a) the control sample before testing; (b) the control sample after testing; (c) 5MUV:10MSF; (d) 10MUV:5MSF; (e) 15MUV:5MSF.
Figure 4. The appearance of the sample surface under the impact of high-speed heat flow: (a) the control sample before testing; (b) the control sample after testing; (c) 5MUV:10MSF; (d) 10MUV:5MSF; (e) 15MUV:5MSF.
Molecules 28 05267 g004
Figure 5. The presumed mechanism of fire- and heat-protective action of materials with the content of functionally active structures.
Figure 5. The presumed mechanism of fire- and heat-protective action of materials with the content of functionally active structures.
Molecules 28 05267 g005
Figure 6. SEM microphotograph of the coke layer being formed after a high-temperature impact.
Figure 6. SEM microphotograph of the coke layer being formed after a high-temperature impact.
Molecules 28 05267 g006
Figure 7. Structural formula of dimethylcarbamyl(diaminomethyl)phosphoramide [34].
Figure 7. Structural formula of dimethylcarbamyl(diaminomethyl)phosphoramide [34].
Molecules 28 05267 g007
Table 1. Proportions studied of microspheres, microfibers, and DDF.
Table 1. Proportions studied of microspheres, microfibers, and DDF.
IngredientSample Number
5MUV:10MSF10MUV:5MSF15MUV:5MSF
Content, wt. pts. per 100 wt. pts. Rubber
Aluminosilicate microspheres1055
Carbon microfibers51015
DDF111
Table 2. Vulcanized Rubber Properties.
Table 2. Vulcanized Rubber Properties.
ParameterSample Number
Ref.Control
Sample
5MUV:10MSF10MUV:5MSF15MUV:5MSF
Tensile strength ft, MPaNot less than 6.016.58.511.812.4
Breaking elongation εrel, %Not less than 300450400350380
Permanent elongation θperm, %Not more than 3020251818
Density ρ, kg m−3Not more than 11001080106510821105
Heating time of unheated surface of a sample up to 100 °C, s62708783
Coke number CCV, %2.414.815.916.7
Linear burning speed Vl.b., mm min−132.130.426.725.4
Coke layer tear propagation strength σ, mPa37.340.141.441.6
Table 3. Rubber Formulas.
Table 3. Rubber Formulas.
IngredientSample Number
Control Sample5MUV:10MSF10MUV:5MSF15MUV:5MSF
Content, wt. pts. per 100 wt. pts. Rubber
EPDM-40100100100100
BS-12030303030
Zinc oxide5555
Stearine1111
Captax2222
Sulphur2222
FAS0161616
Total140156156156
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kablov, V.F.; Novopoltseva, O.M.; Kryukova, D.A.; Keibal, N.A.; Burmistrov, V.; Kochetkov, V.G. Functionally Active Microheterogeneous Systems for Elastomer Fire- and Heat-Protective Materials. Molecules 2023, 28, 5267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135267

AMA Style

Kablov VF, Novopoltseva OM, Kryukova DA, Keibal NA, Burmistrov V, Kochetkov VG. Functionally Active Microheterogeneous Systems for Elastomer Fire- and Heat-Protective Materials. Molecules. 2023; 28(13):5267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kablov, Victor F., Oksana M. Novopoltseva, Daria A. Kryukova, Natalia A. Keibal, Vladimir Burmistrov, and Vladimir G. Kochetkov. 2023. "Functionally Active Microheterogeneous Systems for Elastomer Fire- and Heat-Protective Materials" Molecules 28, no. 13: 5267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135267

APA Style

Kablov, V. F., Novopoltseva, O. M., Kryukova, D. A., Keibal, N. A., Burmistrov, V., & Kochetkov, V. G. (2023). Functionally Active Microheterogeneous Systems for Elastomer Fire- and Heat-Protective Materials. Molecules, 28(13), 5267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28135267

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop