Next Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Eight Major Compounds of Lonicerae japonicae flos after Oral Administration in Normal Rats and Rats with Liver Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
The Detailed Pharmacodynamics of the Gut Relaxant Effect and GC-MS Analysis of the Grewia tenax Fruit Extract: In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Cytotoxicity, and Larvicidal Activities of Selected Synthetic Bis-Chalcones
Previous Article in Special Issue
Native Mass Spectrometry Coupled to Spectroscopic Methods to Investigate the Effect of Soybean Isoflavones on Structural Stability and Aggregation of Zinc Deficient and Metal-Free Superoxide Dismutase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Spices as a Source of Antimicrobial Synergic Molecules to Treat Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections

by
Nathália Barroso Almeida Duarte
1,2 and
Jacqueline Aparecida Takahashi
2,*
1
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte CEP 31270-901, Brazil
2
Chemistry Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte CEP 31270-901, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8210; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238210
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the lack of antiviral agents available for human use, while the complexity of the physiological changes caused by coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) imposed the prescription of multidrug pharmacotherapy to treat infected patients. In a significant number of cases, it was necessary to add antibiotics to the prescription to decrease the risk of co-infections, preventing the worsening of the patient’s condition. However, the precautionary use of antibiotics corroborated to increase bacterial resistance. Since the development of vaccines for COVID-19, the pandemic scenario has changed, but the development of new antiviral drugs is still a major challenge. Research for new drugs with synergistic activity against virus and resistant bacteria can produce drug leads to be used in the treatment of mild cases of COVID-19 and to fight other viruses and new viral diseases. Following the repurposing approach, plant spices have been searched for antiviral lead compounds, since the toxic effects of plants that are traditionally consumed are already known, speeding up the drug discovery process. The need for effective drugs in the context of viral diseases is discussed in this review, with special focus on plant-based spices with antiviral and antibiotic activity. The activity of plants against resistant bacteria, the diversity of the components present in plant extracts and the synergistic interaction of these metabolites and industrialized antibiotics are discussed, with the aim of contributing to the development of antiviral and antibiotic drugs. A literature search was performed in electronic databases such as Science Direct; SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online); LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences); Elsevier, SpringerLink; and Google Scholar, using the descriptors: antiviral plants, antibacterial plants, coronavirus treatment, morbidities and COVID-19, bacterial resistance, resistant antibiotics, hospital-acquired infections, spices of plant origin, coronaviruses and foods, spices with antiviral effect, drug prescriptions and COVID-19, and plant synergism. Articles published in English in the period from 2020 to 2022 and relevant to the topic were used as the main inclusion criteria.

1. Introduction

The approval of the first antiviral drug for human use (idoxuridine) occurred in 1963 and, despite all scientific and technological development, the list of antiviral drugs available as medicines is still insufficient [1]. Research in this area is necessary, especially because viruses use the host cells to multiply and antiviral substances usually cause multiple side effects [2]. Many viruses are endemic in various parts of the world, such as Ebola, HIV, hepatitis B, dengue, zika, flu, and, more recently, coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Vaccination reduced the spread of pandemic and endemic viral diseases, but a relevant number of individuals are still infected by viruses daily. Although antiviral drugs can be useful in the treatment of some viruses, the development of less toxic effective drugs is desirable, especially considering the 2019 coronavirus pandemic scenario, which exposed the lack of effective and safe antiviral drugs and the need for advances in research to develop new drugs with faster results and less side effects. Remdesivir prescribed to severely ill patients resulted in faster recovery; however, for higher effectiveness, anti-inflammatory or immunomodulators such as baricitinib, tocilizumab, and bamlanivimab must be co-administrated to target both viral proliferation and the hyperimmune response [3]. Remdesivir’s safety and scope of action is still the target of several clinical studies, although some side effects such as cardiotoxicity have already been reported in an in vitro human cardiac model. This side effect must be further evaluated to avoid fatalities and long-term sequelae, as cardiac-compromised individuals have a worse prognostic of COVID-19 [3]. Besides remdesivir, molnupiravir, fluvoxamine and Paxlovid are also oral antiviral drugs with a positive reduction in the mortality and hospitalization rates of COVID-19 patients, and they also feature good overall safety [4]. Molnupiravir has the advantage of being effective in five days and avoiding major events, as observed in clinical trials, although one study pointed out that this drug caused mutations. Molnupiravir is effective in the first days after the initial symptoms and is recommended by the OMS, but it is recommended to treat mild cases. Fluvoxamine’s mechanism of action has drawn attention, while Paxlovid, a SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitor, was designed to work directly on the novel coronavirus-specific protease [4]. However, side effects and the need for broader coverage led to clinical studies aimed at repurposing several drugs as antivirals to fight COVID-19, but most of them failed in the clinic studies or showed inconsistent results.
In addition, the complexity of the physiological changes caused by coronavirus has created several challenges, and adjustments were added to the antiviral pharmacotherapy scenario at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The treatment of individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SRAG) was unsuccessful with the single prescription of antiviral agents and, in most cases, the administration of a pool of medicines was required. Among these medicines, antibiotics were frequently prescribed to prevent coinfections. Due to the pandemic dimension, this huge increase in the use of antibiotics has contributed to the development of acquired bacterial resistance [5]. This resistance appears when bacteria are able to make changes in the active site targeted by the antibiotic, reducing the infiltration of the active compound in the bacterial cell or even releasing enzymes capable of causing structural degradation in the antibiotic structure [6]. By 2030, the economic reflection of antimicrobial resistance problems could lead to extreme poverty for up to 24 million people [7]. According to the UN ad hoc Group on Interagency Coordination on Antimicrobial Resistance, drug resistance could cause 10 million deaths per year [7]. In this scenario, the development of new antibacterial drugs, together with antiviral drugs, is a world priority, in order to address the still ongoing demand caused by COVID-19, but also to decrease the number of deaths associated with bacterial infections worldwide. New antibacterial and antiviral drugs are expected to cause less side effects and are intended for several groups of individuals that still cannot rely on safe medicines, such as patients with comorbidities or immunocompromised and pregnant women. In addition, new antimicrobials are expected to have mechanisms of action, therefore, making it possible to fight resistant bacteria and viruses. Moreover, low cost is extremely desirable, in order to increase access to the treatment.
Plants remain an interesting source of novel molecules due to their proven efficacy, adequate bioavailability and easy applicability in human consumption, as well as the positive history of plant products that have become a source of modern prescription medicines [1,8]. Artemisinin is one of the most recent and successful examples of natural products that have reached the international market as a finished pharmaceutical product. Artemisinin and its derivatives have been adopted by dozens of countries as a first-line anti-malarial drug, and it has a significative bulk export production. Among the advantages of artemisinin over other anti-malarial drugs, this natural product provides a rapid decrease in parasitemia and delays drug resistance in combination therapy [9]. The good outcomes of new medicines from plants in several fields has led to an intense search for new drug leads to combat the coronavirus and to treat illnesses associated to COVID-19 [10].
However, drug development from plant metabolites is a slow process, contrasting with the urgent demand for new antiviral and antibacterial agents. In addition, once a promising molecule is identified, toxicity screenings, formulation studies, bioavailability and, later, the scale up for pilot industrial production can be limiting factors for reaching pre-clinical and clinical phases [11]. A faster strategy, likely to be successful, is based on the research of plant species already consumed by humans (i.e., with known toxicity) and industrially produced (i.e., available on a large-scale basis and with industrial processing already established) [12]. Spices of vegetable origin are among the plant sources that fit into this profile. A huge number of spices produced on an industrial scale and which are safe for human consumption and used in different countries are described in the scientific literature as promising antibacterial and antiviral agents [13,14].
In this review, we initially present data demonstrating the need for new antiviral and antibiotic drugs, especially corroborated within the scenario of the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The second part discusses the potential of plants widely used as spices, with antibacterial, antiviral and related properties described in the literature, for the development of new antiviral and antibacterial drugs. The pharmacological potential of the secondary metabolites produced by these species, the synergic effects and the current research on antivirals are also discussed.

2. COVID 19: Context, Treatment and New Drugs Demand

2.1. COVID-19 Scenario

COVID-19 originated from the SARS-CoV-2 virus of the Coronaviridae family. The organization of SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with the presence of 16 non-structural and four structural proteins: peak (S), envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N). The S protein binds to the ACE2 receptor, which is located on the host cell surface, and allows the insertion of RNA into the host cell cytoplasm. This interaction also requires the priming of the S protein that takes place when SARS-CoV-2 binds to the protease. As a result, the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the ace2 receptor allows the virus to enter the host cell, mainly by endocytosis, where it initiates a deregulated immune response, resulting in acute injuries [15].
The most common clinical symptoms in individuals affected by COVID-19 disease are fever (98% of cases), followed by cough (76%), dyspnea (55%) and myalgia or fatigue (44%). The recurrent laboratory characteristic among those infected with the virus is leukopenia (25% of cases), a worrying condition because the reduction in white blood cells in the bloodstream decreases the body’s ability to fight infections, resulting in immunity output [16]. The clinical symptoms of COVID-19 were classified as mild, moderate or severe, with the need to prescribe antibiotics predominantly for severe and moderate conditions [17]. Dyspnea is the main motivation for intubation, a recurrent scenario related to the clinical complications caused by COVID-19. In this process, a cannula is positioned through the gloat to the region of the arytenoid cartilages vocal process. These arytenoids are coated with a thin layer of the mucosa perichondrium, and intubation makes these cartilages susceptible to trauma, excessive cough, upper respiratory tract-related infections, and pneumonia, clinical conditions that also require the prescription of antibiotics [18].
Comorbidities and advanced age were earlier associated with hospitalization and severe symptoms among patients with COVID-19. The immune debit caused by some comorbidities decreases the individual’s resistance to SARS-CoV-2, making these individuals prone to more severe infections than those without comorbidities. These conditions predispose to the development of bacterial infections, increasing the possibility of coinfection and hindering the convalescence of patients [19]. A study with 315 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 revealed that 95 (30%) had comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, cardiovascular alterations, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and cancer. Among these 95 individuals, 69 presented superinfections caused by bacteria, impacting the length of hospitalization (30 days), while the hospitalization period of those that did not develop this condition was 11 days [20].
COVID-19-related morbidities fall under the class of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCCD). NCCDs are responsible for 70% of deaths worldwide, of which 80% occur in low- and middle-income countries (72.6% in Brazil), and the need to prescribe antibiotics for patients in this group greatly increased with the COVID-19 pandemic [21]. In a study conducted in China, it was reported that among a group of 856 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, approximately 30–50% had one or more comorbidities, mainly hypertension (30–50%), diabetes (8–20%), cardiovascular disease (5–20%), chronic liver disease (1–5%) and chronic kidney disease (1- 4%). The study proved that the higher the number of comorbidities, the greater the risk of developing severe conditions and bacterial infections [22]. Among the factors that aggravated the number of people affected by COVID-19, physical inactivity, alcohol abuse, inadequate diet and smoking are frequently cited [21].
Clinical trials have been conducted on dozens of vaccines worldwide, and some of them have received emergency authorization to be used for active and preventive immunization against COVID-19. Some vaccines act by stimulating the production of neutralizing antibodies responsible for protecting the immune system [23]. Immunization through the vaccine has had a positive effect, but the disease is far from being controlled, especially by the emergence of more lethal or more contagious variants [24].

2.2. Combination Pharmacotherapy for Treatment of Patients with COVID-19

Effective drug therapies for the treatment of people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been discussed since the beginning of the pandemic. Combinations of drugs with active ingredients already registered for the treatment of other diseases with symptoms correlated with COVID-19 have been widely explored [25]. This approach expedites the release of drugs when early-stage clinical trials have already been conducted and the drugs are already supplied on the market [26]. However, there is still concern about patient safety, due to the adverse effects associated with the combined use of these drugs, since most of them have already caused side effects when used individually [27].
A main target of drugs within the scope of COVID-19 is the SARS-CoV-2 protein, and the proposed therapies act on viral enzymes or functional proteins, RNA synthesis and replication, blocking the binding of the virus to human cell receptors. They target structural proteins, restore host innate immunity, inhibit virulence factor, or act on host-specific receptors, thus, preventing viral entry [4,28,29].
In numerous completed or ongoing clinical trials, various antiviral and immunomodulatory molecules have been administered to patients with severe COVID-19. In an extensive review, Salasc and colleagues [27] described the combination of treatments used worldwide to combat COVID-19 through randomized clinical trials, such as remdesivir plus baricitinib, lopinavir-ritonavir plus ribavirin and interferon beta-1a (IFNb-1b), as well as dexamethasone together with azithromycin or remdesivir. Remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and favipiravir are capable of inhibiting viral enzymes or functional proteins, RNA synthesis and replication, thus, exhibiting an effect against SARS-CoV-2 [30].
Some medicines of the corticosteroid class—including cortisone, prednisone and methylprednisolone—were also implemented in combination therapies as steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as prescribed antibiotics, for example, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, moxifloxacin and imipenem [31]. The chemical structures of the main antiviral and antibiotic drugs can be found in Figure 1. The synergistic effect of combination therapies delays the onset of drug resistance, due to the additive effect, increasing the safety and efficacy of the treatment [32].

2.3. Prescription of Antibiotics for Patients with COVID-19 and Bacterial Resistance

Currently, there are multiple demands for new antibiotics, some of which are due to the increasing number of serious post-surgery infections caused by resistant bacteria [33]. WHO guidelines did not indicate the prescription of antibiotics for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 with mild symptomatology, nor for those with low suspicion of bacterial infection. However, in severe cases where diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are difficult, the administration of antibiotics is necessary to increase the chance of patients’ survival. This precautionary measure contributes to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains and to the reduction in the efficacy of the antibiotics currently available [34]. As the patient’s condition becomes severe, the antibiotic prescription increases, as shown in Figure 2, and is 64.4% higher for patients requiring mechanical ventilation, as bacterial and fungal coinfections are common in critically ill patients [33]. According to Su et al. [35], 50% of deaths in severe patients with COVID-19 occur in patients with secondary infections. Specifically, in patients with COVID-19, the bacterial co-infection rate reaches 7.7% of cases, and it is mainly related to Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus sp. Patients usually receive broad-spectrum antibiotics such as azithromycin, ceftriaxone, imipenem and moxifloxacin. However, resistant bacteria are a huge problem. Imipenem, a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, significantly reduces inflammatory cytokines, with better results for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with nosocomial bacterial infections. Resistance to carbapenem, an antibiotic of the class of imipenem, has been reported in patients co-infected with A. baumannii (55.6%), imposing treatment difficulties and increasing the likelihood of septic shock [36].
The incidence of secondary lung infections caused by bacteria in COVID-19 patients reached 36% in Germany and 42.8% in China [37]. The geographic distribution of multidrug-resistant bacteria which are not affected by the action of conventional antibiotics is presented in Figure 2 [38]. Infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria in hospital environments are serious, due to the concentration of individuals with fragile health that are more susceptible to infections caused by opportunistic pathogens. The main pathogens related to these infections are identified with the acronym ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter species), which is characterized by bacteria capable of “escaping” the actions of antibiotics [36]. Beyond the issues associated with the mortality derived from ESKAPE bacteria, bacterial triggers associated with these organisms are supposed to participate in the manifestation of some autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis [39,40,41].

2.4. Medicinal and Spice Plants with Antibiotic Activity and Their Synergistic Effects with Industrialized Antibiotics

Industrialized antibiotic accessibility is a huge problem in many parts of the world, due to their cost and the need for a strict uptake routine. Other issues such as stability also contribute to this scenario. To overcome stability issues, some antibiotics must be commercialized as dry powders to ensure activity and extend the shelf life, imposing a step of rehydration for their reconstitution that may become a further problem under several circumstances [42,43]. These issues can be minimized with the use of medicinal plants. Plants with antibiotic power can be used in natura or after simple processing steps, such as extraction, pulverization and drying, or boiling, without a loss of the pharmacological effects [44]. In addition, using the whole plants or their parts instead of commercial antibiotics has the advantage of reduced cost, making this alternative treatment more accessible for the population unable to use prescription antibiotics. A review on the world trends in medicinal plants research, published in 2020 [45], showed that over 110,000 studies on this theme were published between 1960 and 2019, most of which were classified within the scope of pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics. It was estimated that 10% of all vascular plants are used due to their medicinal properties aiming at preventive, control and curative activities [46].
The mechanism of plant extracts’ antibacterial action depends on several factors, such as the characteristics of the target bacterium, extract composition, and the chemical features of the phytoconstituents. In general, this mechanism usually involves disruption and lysis of the microorganism’s cell wall, the release of cellular content, protein binding domain disruption, inhibition of microbial DNA replication and nucleic acid transcription, inhibition of the biosynthesis of compounds toxic to the host and other effects that lead to cell death or a decrease in deleterious effects [47]. The treatment of infections with plant extracts has not been suggested as a major factor in the development of bacterial resistance [48,49], and a number of plant extracts are active against resistant bacteria, as shown in Table 1. Among the plants cited in Table 1, C. englerianum, E. depauperate, M. chamomilla, T. zygis, and T. willdenowii showed high IZ values, therefore, pointing to the inhibition of resistant bacterial strains. In some studies, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination provided additional details, such as selectivity [50,51,52,53,54,55], and may be preferable to determine the full antimicrobial activity [56]. For example, IZ values observed for A. aspera in the presence of different resistant strains do not vary significantly (6.0–6.3 mm), but MIC data demonstrated that this plant is more active against MRSA and MRKP in relation to MrPA [50]. In another study, L. inermis presented higher IZ values for MRSA and MRPA, suggesting that these bacteria are more susceptible to the extract than MRKP, which was confirmed by MIC data [50].
Activity against resistant bacteria through new strategies has been described for plant extracts, such as the quorum-sense mechanism, which is considered a promising alternative to antibiotics. This mechanism, mediated by signal molecules, can be applied to multiple pathogenic bacteria and is based on the action of auto-inducers’ self-excreted molecules capable of regulating the expression of virulence genes [58]. Overall, quorum-sensing acts in the host defense, controlling biofilm formation and the production of compounds that are toxic to the bacteria. The early inhibition of biofilm formation was reported over S. aureus and S. pyogenes. The restriction of van der Walls and electrotactic interactions, avoiding the attachment of pathogenic bacterial cells, was a mechanism of action that explains the decrease in infection [49].
Technological development has been successfully used to improve antibacterial activity, as in the development of clusters of natural products with silver ions. The clusters attach to the surface of the bacterial cell wall, damaging the cell surface. Moreover, silver ions disable the microbial growth process, as shown for the A. catechu-Ag cluster [58].
Complementing the new mechanisms of action, other major benefits of using the whole plant concern the well-known synergic and/or complementary effects of the different metabolites present in plants/plant extracts. In cumin, the antimicrobial activity is related to the synergy among terpenes and some minor constituents such as limonene, eugenol and pinene (Bazaka et al., 2015). The isolation of the bioactive metabolites may be unnecessary, since the phytoconstituents can be less active once administered alone, due to the lack of synergic compounds [41,64]. In this way, the concomitant use of industrialized antibiotics and bioactive plant extracts—the so-called antibiotic-adjunct combination strategy—has been proposed to overcome problems related to resistant bacteria [65]. The efficacy of combination therapy can be exemplified by the use of penicillinase and β-lactamase inhibitors as co-drugs to overcome bacterial resistance to some antibiotics. Combinatorial plant-drug therapies have already been indicated to treat viral infectious diseases, such as AIDS [66]. Even plant-drug combinations lacking synergic effects do not interfere in the individual activity of the antibiotic, which is highly encouraging for research and the application of combinational therapies [30,41].
The synergism between antibiotics (ampicillin, penicillin, tetracycline, methicillin, etc.) and several plant extracts (green tea, khat, pomegranate, basil, lemon balm, grape pomace and oregano), plant metabolites (curcumin, epigallocatechin-gallate, flavonoids, alkaloids and terpenes), as well as essential oils is widely described, and some examples are shown in Table 2. In general, synergy can be achieved by the blockage of multidrug resistance pumps, consequently facilitating the entrance and traffic of antibacterial agents into the bacterial cell [8]. Therefore, combinational synergistic approaches may be a good tool to combat resistant bacterial strains [41]. Simple and general methods exist that are capable of evaluating the synergistic effect of drug combination, enabling measurement of the qualitative and quantitative physiological effects of two or more drugs [67].
As observed in Table 2, the association of plants with antibiotics lead to synergistic effects; this is important, as it allows the administration of lower doses of the industrialized antibiotic, with the same or even higher antibiotic effects, contributing to postponing the phenomenon of resistance. The inhibition of efflux pumps by some phytochemicals consequently avoids bacterial exposure to sub-therapeutic concentrations of antibiotics, which is one of the causes of acquired resistance [71]. Plant metabolites that favor morphological disruptions on the bacteria cell wall help to decrease the number of functional bacterial cells to be attacked by the antibiotic, as postulated for the synergistic interaction of thymol–ciprofloxacin [74]. The antimicrobial activity mechanism of thymol has been linked to the presence of free hydroxyl groups that are involved in membrane depolarization [74]. The action of this phytochemical plays an important role in potentializing the antibiotic effect of commercial drugs such as ciprofloxacin. In some examples, plant metabolites increase their outer membrane permeability to allow antibiotic activity. Flow cytometry was used to show that V. diospyroides’ synergistic action in combination with ampicillin is the result of cell membrane granularity disruption [76]. Plants can act directly in specific intracellular enzymes or deactivate the production of enzymes produced by bacteria to degrade the antibiotic chemical structure, therefore, helping the antibiotic to enter the bacterium cell to exercise its activity [71]. The synergic multi-target action of phytochemicals can also influence the production of enzymes necessary for endogenous energy production and protein synthesis.

2.5. Potential of Plant Spices with Antibiotic Activity as Antiviral Agents

Plants used as spices have some interesting particularities that can be explored in the search for natural remedies to treat patients requiring the simultaneous use of antibacterial and antiviral agents. First, the widespread consumption of plant-derived spices over time has demonstrated their safety for human consumption [78]. Second, spices are likely composed of stable compounds, as they are frequently used in hot dishes, and concomitantly with acid compounds in food preparation, such as vinegar and lemon. Third, the use of such spices as adjuncts, including in COVID-19 prevention or treatment, would rely on the patient’s consent, as these plants are already traditionally consumed [79]. Moreover, these plants are usually commercialized as finely sprayed powders with a long shelf-life, facilitating the development of multiple formulations. The safety, authentication and traceability of condiments are well studied, and effective non-destructive vibrational and atomic spectral analytical techniques are available for quality control and meet the increasing industrial demand [80,81]. The global condiment market, estimated to be worth USD 76.6B by 2020, is projected to reach USD 103.7B by 2026 [82]. China, Turkey, Vietnam and Indonesia are the markets leaders in the growth of this sector and, in the coming years, they should be influenced by trends related to health, gourmet flavors and ethical values.
Several plant spices with antibiotic activity have gained attention as antiviral agents, especially against SARS-CoV-2. The consumption of plant spices with antibiotic and antiviral properties by patients with mild and moderate cases of viral infections deserve deeper studies, as they could assist in avoiding and combating concomitant infections. Some secondary metabolites present in these plants have been proven as potent antiviral compounds. The chemical structures of some relevant antiviral natural products in the context of COVID-19 are presented in Figure 3.
Curcumin, a natural component of Curcuma longa, is one of the most prominent examples of a worldwide consumed condiment which has both antibacterial [83] and antiviral properties [84] (Figure 4). Curcumin diminishes fatigue and bronchoconstriction, helping to alleviate the symptoms of COVID-19 [85]. The antiviral action mechanism of curcumin was recently reviewed [84]. The administration of curcumin in patients with COVID-19 on a formulation containing piperine (a compound that promotes the absorption of curcumin) improved some symptoms, compared to the control group, on a randomized clinical trial [86]. Curcumin is also suggested as a promising prophylactic candidate for the treatment of COVID-19 and is a target of other studies towards the development of nano formulations and supplements [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94].
Allicin [95,96], eugenol [97,98], thymoquinone [99], apigenin [100,101], carvacrol [102,103] and thymol [104] are some of the most studied metabolites of spice plants with antiviral effects and consequent applications in the efforts to combat COVID-19 (Table 3).
Garlic is a condiment native to Asia and has been used as a medicine since ancient times, as in Egypt, where it was consumed during the construction of the pyramids. These and other historical features, as well as their antibacterial properties—especially those related to the organosulfur metabolites of garlic—were recently reviewed [105]. Garlic also has immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antitumor, antidiabetic and cardioprotective effects. Allicin, the major component of raw garlic, is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. The inhibition of specific bacteria by garlic has been studied, as in the case of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), an invasive bacterium suggested to be the major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality during the first weeks of life [106]. Garlic has been reported as active against over twenty viruses, including adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, influenza A virus and human immunodeficiency virus [107]. In silico studies targeting host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein related to coronavirus resistance showed strong interactions of garlic essential oils with the amino acids of the ACE2 protein and the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 (PDB6LU7). In addition, synergistic interactions of components were observed, resulting in good inhibition of the ACE2 and PDB6LU7 proteins [108]. On a broad docking screening with 75 metabolites present in traditional Indian spices, one of the highlights was the flavonoid myricetin, a metabolite produced by A. sativum. The activity of myricetin was more pronounced against main proteases (Mpro) than against SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (SP) [109]. Pre-clinical and clinical studies of the effect of garlic on viral infections, including those caused by SARS-CoV, have shown the effectiveness of garlic’s antiviral capacity by means of several mechanisms, such as downregulation of the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, the blockage of viral entry into host cells, and inhibition of viral RNA polymerase [107].
Another spice, N. sativa (black cumin)—a healing herb of the Ranunculaceae family and much appreciated in North Africa—is traditionally used to treat various diseases including hypertension, asthma, inflammation, diabetes, cough, headache, bronchitis, eczema, dizziness and fever. Black cumin’s pharmacological properties, such as immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer activity are described [110], in addition to the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 [111,112]. In a broader context, the immunomodulatory components present in traditional plants, such as basil (O. sanctum) and cinnamon (C. verum), can potentiate the effect of antibiotics when administered together (Table 3). Basil has an anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agent named eugenol, while cinnamon is used in traditional medicine for various lung-related disorders, including pneumonia, infectious diseases and pleural effusion [113]. Other essential oils from spices have also been reported as antimicrobial agents [114].
Table 3. Plant spices and condiments and their antiviral profile.
Table 3. Plant spices and condiments and their antiviral profile.
Scientific Name [Popular Name]Main ComponentAntiviral Effects/COVID-19 ApplicationsReference
C. longa [Turmeric]CurcuminAttenuation of poly(I:C)-induced immune and inflammatory responses by inhibiting the TLR3/TBK1/IFN-β cascade[90]
Enhancement of oral drug delivery system (Labrasol® and tween 80 bicelles)[91]
Molecular docking studies showed reliable ADME profile[92]
Analogues as dual inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2[93]
Development of nanoformulations[87,94]
Allium sativum
[Garlic]
AllicinSuppresses production and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulates of immune system cells (NK, lymphocytes, eosinophils and macrophages)[95]
Suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and CRP[96]
Cinnamomum verum
[Dalchini]
EugenolInhibition of specific immune responses to allergens, reduces side effects of some anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidant properties[97]
Increases the bioavailability of antiviral drug saquinavir[98]
Nigella sativa
[Black cumin]
ThymoquinoneInhibitory effects on viral spike protein with cellular angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)[99]
Inhibition of RdRp of SARS-CoV-2, especially α-hederin; ongoing drug development strategy against SARS-CoV-2[99]
O. basilicum
[Basil]
ApigeninThe phytoconstituents vicenin, sorientin and ursolic acid inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Mpro[100]
Development of gellan gum hydrogel with basil oil nanoemulsion[101]
O. vulgare
[Oregano]
CarvacrolInhibition of viral replication and activity of SARS-CoV-2 3CLPRO[102]
Potent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication (modeling studies)[103]
Thymus vulgaris [Thyme]ThymolInhibits the viral spike protein, preventing SARS-CoV-2 entry[103]
Essential oils induce cytopathogenic effect against SARS-CoV in Vero-E6 cells[104]
The therapeutic properties of O. vulgare, popularly known as oregano, are associated with terpenes and flavonoids. Antiviral studies demonstrated strong inhibition of viral replication and SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro activity, while in molecular modeling assays, terpe-noids were highlighted as potent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication [102,103]. Thyme (T. vulgaris) is also reported to be active against fungi, viruses and bacteria. It is used as a flavoring agent for cheese and beverages, and in traditional medicine to cure melancholic conditions, skin and respiratory lesions [115]. Thyme essential oil has been shown to be effective against several RNA viruses, including coronaviruses, and it induces a cytopathogenic effect against SARS-CoV in Vero-E6 cells [100,104].
Figure 5 shows a scheme on some key steps in SARS-CoV-2 penetration, replication and exit, as well as some medicines and spices that act in several points.

2.6. Recent Research in Spice-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Context

The recent literature shows a huge number of studies on traditional plant spices to enable the search for drugs that protect against COVID-19 and other possible viral pandemics. It is unnecessary to highlight the need to support these studies to avoid, as much as possible, other viral pandemics. Some of these studies and related review papers are listed in Table 4.
These review papers demonstrate that endophyte fungi as a source of new drug leads to treat individuals with COVID-19 is a major research theme all over the world [116,117]. The research is mainly associated with host plants that have key biological activities, including species already used to fight COVID-19 symptoms [121,127]. Some works searched metabolites to be used in the prevention of viral infections, by means of strengthening the immune system [122,123]. Pure natural components of plant spices have also been reviewed [124], and several other approaches have been developed. The number of studies listed in Table 4, and the information gathered in this review clearly shows the potential of plants, and specifically, plant spices, as antibacterial and antiviral agents, alone or associated with industrialized medicines. Although it is important to study new plants to discover novel metabolites, there is much that can be done, and more quickly, using the scientific knowledge already available in the literature about specific plants. Although plant metabolites have a natural origin, problems such as the development of allergies, the use of ineffective dosages, toxicity caused by over-dosage, the form of administration, and standardization must be considered at some point. In addition, it must be considered that some spices have high added value and may undergo adulteration during marketing by adding other plants, flour, etc., diluting the active ingredient content.
However, the volume of scientific information proving the pharmacological attributes of hundreds of plants is highly disproportionate to their use as medicines, especially in Western countries. The pharmaceutical industry is expected to invest further in this area to produce more affordable and sustainable antiviral and antibacterial medicines.

3. Conclusions

The development of combination therapies that include antivirals, antibiotics and other drugs was very useful for the treatment of patients infected with coronavirus during the pandemic. However, the development of new antiviral drugs with fewer side effects is still necessary, in order to be prepared against other viruses that may emerge, as well as those circulating endemically in several countries. Among the various problems inherited by the current pandemic, we pointed to the increase in resistant bacterial strains, as the result of the prescription of antibiotics for patients with COVID-19 as a prophylactic measure. Medicinal plants are generally safe and highly accessible for consumption and have been used in many countries to prevent or cure the symptoms of COVID-19, although there is no consensus on the effectiveness of bioactive compounds in low concentrations. Among medicinal plants, plant spices frequently contain components with antiviral and antimicrobial activities, and the synergic interaction of multiple metabolites can improve the biological activity. The industrial availability of many plant spices increases the perspective of the large-scale production of extracts and compounds for clinical trials. In addition, plant extracts have demonstrated promising synergistic effects when used in conjunction with existing antibiotic drugs to combat several types of bacteria, including some resistant strains. Clinical trials using plant extracts combined with other oral medications, in the various existing formulations, are needed to better understand their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and therapeutic potential. In a broader scenario, the development of new antiviral and antibacterial drugs can benefit a significant number of people affected by several viral and infectious diseases, many of which are endemic in various regions of the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.T.; investigation, writing—original draft preparation, N.B.A.D.; writing—review and editing, J.A.T. and N.B.A.D.; funding acquisition, J.A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG PPM-00255-18), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq Grant 304922/2018-8) and Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa (PRPq)/UFMG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tompa, D.R.; Immanuel, A.; Srikanth, S.; Kadhirvel, S. Trends and strategies to combat viral infections: A review on FDA approved antiviral drugs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 524–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kausar, S.; Said, K.F.; Ishaq, M.; Akram, M.; Riaz, M.; Rasool, G.; Malik, A. A review: Mechanism of action of antiviral drugs. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2021, 35, 20587384211002621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kwok, M.; Lee, C.; Li, H.S.; Deng, R.; Tsoi, C.; Ding, Q.; Poon, E.N. Remdesivir induces persistent mitochondrial and structural damage in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 2652–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wen, W.; Chen, C.; Tang, J.; Wang, C.; Zhou, M.; Cheng, Y.; Mao, Q. Efficacy and safety of three new oral antiviral treatment (molnupiravir, fluvoxamine and Paxlovid) for COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Ann. Med. 2022, 54, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Catalano, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Scumaci, D.; Giuzio, F.; Saturnino, C.; Aquaro, S.; Rosano, C.; Sinicropi, M.S. Multidrug Resistance (MDR): A Widespread Phenomenon in Pharmacological Therapies. Molecules 2022, 27, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Corrêa, R.C.G.; Heleno, A.S.; Alves, M.J.; Isabel, I.C.F.R. Bacterial resistance: Antibiotics of last generation used in clinical practice and the arise of natural products as new therapeutic alternatives. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 815–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (IACG). No Time to Wait: Securing the Future from Drug Resistant Infections. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections-en.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  8. Ayaz, M.; Ullah, F.; Sadiq, A.; Ullah, F.; Ovais, M.; Ahmed, J.; Devkota, H.P. Synergistic interactions of phytochemicals with antimicrobial agents: Potential strategy to counteract drug resistance. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 308, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Peng, D.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Q.; Guo, Y. The production and exportation of artemisinin-derived drugs in China: Current status and existing challenges. Malaria J. 2016, 15, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tiwari, S.; Dubey, N.K. Traditional medicinal plants as promising source of immunomodulator against COVID-19. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 8, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Akinbolade, S.; Coughlan, D.; Fairbairn, R.; McConkey, G.; Powell, H.; Ogunbayo, D.; Craig, D. Combination therapies for COVID-19: An overview of the clinical trials landscape. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 1590–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taher, M.; Tik, N.; Susanti, D. Drugs intervention study in COVID-19 management. Drug. Metab. Pers. Ther. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Berber, E.; Sumbria, D.; Kokkaya, S. A metabolic blueprint of COVID-19 and long-term vaccine efficacy. Drug Metab Pers Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dhama, K.; Karthik, K.; Khandia, R.; Munjal, A.; Tiwari, R.; Rana, R.; Khurana, S.K.; Sana, U.; Khan, R.; Alagawany, M.; et al. Medicinal and Therapeutic Potential of Herbs and Plant Metabolites/Extracts Countering Viral Pathogens—Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Curr. Drug. Metab. 2018, 19, 236–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takahashi, J.A.; Barbosa, B.V.R.; Lima, M.T.N.S.; Cardoso, P.G.; Contigli, C.; Pimenta, L.P.S. Antiviral fungal metabolites and some insights into their contribution to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021, 46, 116366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weng, L.M.; Su, X.; Wang, X.Q. Pain Symptoms in Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Literature Review. J. Pain Res. 2021, 14, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Molla, M.A.; Yeasmin, M.; Slam, K.; Sharif, M.; Amin, R.; Nafisa, T.; Ghosh, A.K.; Parveen, M.; Arif, M.H.; Alam, J.A.J.; et al. Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns at COVID-19 Dedicated Wards in Bangladesh: Findings from a Single Center Study. Inf. Prev. Pract. 2021, 3, 100–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mobaraki, P.D.; Zaidi, A.K. Consequences of Intubation in COVID-19 Patients: Are We Ready. IJOPL 2020, 10, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clancy, J.C.; Buehrle, J.D.; Nguyen, M.H. PRO: The COVID-19 pandemic will result in increased antimicrobial resistance rates. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Falcone, M.; Tiseo, G.; Giordano, C.; Leonildi, A.; Menichini, M.; Vecchione, A.; Pistello, M.; Guarracino, F.; Ghiadoni, L.; Forfori, F.; et al. Predictors of hospital-acquired bacterial and fungal superinfections in COVID-19: A prospective observational study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 76, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hirschmann, R.; Bortolotto, C.C.; Silva, M.T.; Machado, A.K.F.; Xavier, M.O.; Fernandes, M.P.; Martins, R.C.; Bielemann, R.M.; Rodrigues, L.T.; Wehrmeister, F.C. Simultaneity of risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases in a rural population of a Southern Brazilian city. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2020, 23, E200066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Cai, H.; Gu, J.; Lian, J.; Lu, Y.; Jia, H.; Hu, J.; Jin, C.; et al. Impact of comorbidities on patients with COVID-19: A large retrospective study in Zhejiang, China. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 2821–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Coccia, M. Optimal levels of vaccination to reduce COVID-19 infected individuals and deaths: A global analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 30, 10024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hoffmann, M.; Krüger, N.; Schulz, S.; Cossmann, A.; Rocha, C.; Kempf, A.; Pöhlmann, S. The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cell 2022, 185, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Choi, A.; Koch, M.; Wu, K.; Chu, L.; Ma, L.Z.; Hill, A.; Nunna, N.; Huang, W.; Oestreicher, J.; Colpitts, T.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant mRNA vaccine boosters in healthy adults: An interim analysis. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 2025–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Javorac, D.; Grahovac, L.; Manic, L.; Srrojikovic, N.; Andelkovi, A.; Bulat, Z.; Dukic, D.; Curcic, M.; Djordjevic, A.B. An overview of the safety assessment of medicines currently used in the COVID-19 disease treatment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 144, 111639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Salasc, F.; Lahlali, T.; Laurent, E.; Calatrava, M.R.; Pizzorno, A. Treatments for COVID-19: Lessons from 2020 and new therapeutic options. COPHAR 2022, 62, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shubhangi, K.; Darren, F. Repurposing drugs for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Computational design insights into mechanisms of action. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 1316–1330. [Google Scholar]
  29. Milas, S.; Poncelet, A.; Buttafuoco, F.; Pardo, A.; Lali, S.E.; Cherifi, S. Antibiotic use in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Outcomes and associated factors. Acta Clin. Belg. 2022, 77, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bakowski, A.M.; Beutler, N.; Chen, E.; Trinh, T.; Nguyen, H.; Kirkpatrick, M.G.; Parren, M.; Yang, L.; Ricketts, J.; Gupta, A.K.; et al. Oral drug repositioning candidates and synergistic remdesivir combinations for the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khataniar, A.; Pathak, U.; Rajkhowa, S.; Jha, A.N. A Comprehensive Review of Drug Repurposing Strategies against Known Drug Targets of COVID-19. Covid 2022, 2, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Langford, B.J.; So, M.; Raybardhan, S.; Leung, V.; Soucy, R.P.J.; Westwood, D.; Daneman, N.; Macfadden, D.R. Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: Rapid review and meta-analysis. CMI 2021, 27, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miranda, C.; Silva, V.; Capita, R.; Calleja, C.A.; Igrejas, G.; Poeta, P. Implications of antibiotics use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Present and future. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3413–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lucien, A.M.B.; Canarie, M.F.; Kilgore, P.E.; Denis, G.J.; Fenelon, N.; Pierre, M.; Cerpa, M.; Joseph, G.; Maki, G.; Zervos, M.J.; et al. Antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in the COVID-19 era: Perspective from resource-limited settings. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 104, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, L.; Tu, Y.; Kong, D.; Chen, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Zhuang, C.; Wang, Z. Drug repurposing of anti-infective clinical drugs: Discovery of two potential anti-cytokine storm agents. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, X.; Liao, B.; Cheng, L.; Peng, X.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, T.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Ren, B. The microbial coinfection in COVID-19. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7777–7785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chong, W.H.; Saha, B.K.; Ramani, A.; Chopra, A. State-of-the-art review of secondary pulmonary infections in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. J. Infect. 2021, 49, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Uchino, K.; Kolikonda, M.K.; Brown, D.; Kovi, S.; Collins, D.; Khawaja, Z.; Buletko, A.B.; Russman, A.N.; Hussain, M.S. Decline in Stroke Presentations During COVID-19 Surge. Stroke 2020, 51, 2544–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ma, Y.X.; Wang, C.Y.; Li, Y.Y.; Li, J.; Wan, Q.Q.; Chen, J.H.; Tay, F.R.; Niu, L.N. Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1901872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Nadeem, F.S.; Gohar, U.F.; Tahir, S.F.; Mukhtar, H.; Pornpukdeewattana, S.; Nukthamna, P.; Ali, A.M.M.; Bavisetty, S.C.B.; Massa, S. Antimicrobial resistance: More than 70 years of war between humans and bactéria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 578–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ilanko, A.; Cock, I.E. The interactive antimicrobial activity of conventional antibiotics and Petalostigma spp. extracts against bacterial triggers of some autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Pharmacogn. J. 2019, 11, 292–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Obakiro, S.B.; Kiyimba, K.; Paasi, G.; Napyo, A.; Anthierens, S.; Waako, P.; Royen, P.V.; Iramiot, J.S.; Goossens, H.; Kostyanev, T. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria among patients in two tertiary hospitals in Eastern Uganda. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 25, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nelson, R.E.; Hatfield, K.M.; Wolford, H.; Samore, M.H.; Scott, R.D.; Reddy, S.C.; Paul, P.; Jernigan, J.A.; Baggs, L. National Estimates of Healthcare Costs Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections Among patients hospitalized in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdulbari, A.; Ali, N.M.; Raghif, A.R.A.; Matloob, A.N. Comparison of Oral Isotretinoin vs Azithromycin in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris. Indian J. Med. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 2021, 5, 1485–1489. [Google Scholar]
  45. Salmerón-Manzano, E.; Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Worldwide research trends on medicinal plants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hao, D.C.; Xiao, P.G. Pharmaceutical resource discovery from traditional medicinal plants: Pharmacophylogeny and pharmacophylogenomics. Chin. Herb. Med. 2020, 12, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khan, T.; Sankhe, K.; Suvarna, V.; Sherje, A.; Patel, K.; Dravyakar, B. DNA gyrase inhibitors: Progress and synthesis of potent compounds as antibacterial agents. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 103, 923–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Anand, U.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N. A comprehensive review on medicinal plants as antimicrobial therapeutics: Potential avenues of biocompatible drug discovery. Metabolites 2019, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Baloyi, I.T.; Idowu, J.A.; Abdullahi, A.Y.; Sekelwa, C. Antibacterial, antiquorum sensing, antibiofilm activities and chemical profiling of selected South African medicinal plants against multi-drug resistant bacteria. J. Med. Plant Res. 2022, 16, 52–65. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nigussie, D.; Gail, D.; Beyene, T.T.; Malcolm, B.; Adefris, L.B.; Abebaw, F.; Eyasu, M. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Ethiopian Medicinal Plants: A Systematic Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 1663–9812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Manandhar, S.; Luitel, S.; Dahal, R.K. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. J. Trop. Med. 2019, 2019, 1895340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Choi, J.S.; Jung, H.C.; Baek, Y.J.; Kim, B.Y.; Lee, M.W.; Kim, H.D.; Kim, S.W. Antibacterial Activity of Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Areca catechu Extract against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kebede, T.; Gadisa, E.; Tufa, A. Antimicrobial activities evaluation and phytochemical screening of some selected medicinal plants: A possible alternative in the treatment of multidrug-resistant microbes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cech, N.B.; Junio, H.A.; Ackermann, L.W.; Kavanaugh, J.S.; Horswill, A.R. Quorum quenching and antimicrobial activity of goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1556–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Richwagen, N.; Lyles, J.; Dale, B.; Quave, C. Antibacterial Activity of Kalanchoe mortagei and K. fedtschenkoi against ESKAPE Pathogens. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Da Cruz, N.; Ferraz, A.C.; Moraes, T.D.F.S.; Lima, W.G.; Dos Santos, J.P.; Duarte, L.P.; de Magalhães, J.C. Pristimerin isolated from Salacia crassifolia (Mart. Ex. Schult.) G. Don. (Celastraceae) roots as a potential antibacterial agent against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113423. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mulat, M.; Khan, F.; Pandita, A. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial, Anti-biofilm and Anti-virulence Activities of Plant Extracts against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. Nat. Prod. J. 2022, 12, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schultz, F.; Anywar, G.; Tang, H. Targeting ESKAPE pathogens with anti-infective medicinal plants from the Greater Mpigi region in Uganda. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Assis, F.V.; Ferreira, J.M.S.; Siqueira, F.L.; Gonçalves, I.E.; Lacerda, R.P.; Nascimento, R.A.; Araújo, S.G.; Trindade, J.T.; Herrera, K.M.S.; Lima, A.R.L.S. Antibacterial activity of Lamiaceae plant extracts in clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2018, 90, 1665–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Al-sa’ady, A. Antibacterial screening for five local medicinal plants against nosocomial pathogens: Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eurasia J. Biosci. 2020, 14, 553–559. [Google Scholar]
  61. Al-Bakri, A.G.; Othman, G.; Afif, F.U. Determination of the antibiofilm, antiadhesive, and anti-MRSA activities of seven Salvia species. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2010, 6, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Tsai, C.C.; Lin, C.S.; Hsu, C.R. Using the Chinese herb Scutellaria barbata against extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: In vitro and in vivo studies. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bouhrim, M.; Radi, F.Z.; Mechchate, H.; Al-zahrani, M.; Qurtam, A.A.; Aleissa, A.M.; Drioiche, A.; Handaq, N.; Zair, T. Phytochemical Analysis, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Thymus zygis L. and Thymus willdenowii Boiss. Essential Oils. Plants 2022, 11, 15. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sun, L.; Song, F.; Shi, N.; Liu, F.; Li, S.; Li, P.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; et al. Combination of four clinical indicators predicts the severe/critical symptom of patients infected COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 128, 104431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chanda, S.; Rakholiya, K. Combination therapy: Synergism between natural plant extracts and antibiotics against infectious diseases. Microbiol. Book Ser. 2011, 1, 520–529. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hemaiswarya, S.; Kruthiventi, A.K.; Doble, M. Synergism between natural products and antibiotics against infectious diseases. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ju, J.; Xie, Y.; Yu, H.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. Synergistic interactions of plant essential oils with antimicrobial agents: A new antimicrobial therapy. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 1740–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Saquib, S.A.; AlQahtani, N.A.; Ahmad, I.; Kader, M.A.; Al Shahrani, S.S.; Asiri, E.A. Evaluation and Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Herbal Extracts in Combination with Antibiotics on Periodontal pathobionts: An in vitro Microbiological Study. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Embaby, M.A.; El-Raey, M.A.; Zaineldain, M.; Almaghrabi, O.; Marrez, D.A. Synergistic effect and efflux pump inhibitory activity of Ficus nitida phenolic extract with tetracycline against some pathogenic bacteria. Toxin Rev. 2021, 40, 1187–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khleifat, K.M.; Matar, S.A.; Jaafreh, M.; Qaralleh, H.; Al-limoun, M.O.; Alsharafa, K.Y. Essential Oil of Centaurea damascena Aerial Parts, Antibacterial and Synergistic Effect. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dassanayake, M.K.; Khoo, T.J.; An, J. Antibiotic resistance modifying ability of phytoextracts in anthrax biological agent Bacillus anthracis and emerging superbugs: A review of synergistic mechanisms. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2021, 20, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bezalwar, P.M.; Charde, V.N. Study on synergistic action of Coriandrum sativum seed extracts on antibiotics against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa. Environ. Conserv. J. 2019, 20, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Da Silva, J.B.; de Bessa, M.E.; Mayorga, O.A.S.; Andrade, V.T.; da Costa, Y.F.G.; de Freitas, M.R.; Alves, M.S. A promising antibiotic, synergistic and antibiofilm effects of Vernonia condensata Baker (Asteraceae) on Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 123, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Maheshwari, M.; Althubiani, A.S.; Abulreesh, H.H.; Qais, F.A.; Khan, M.S.; Ahmad, I. Bioactive extracts of Carum copticum L. enhances efficacy of ciprofloxacin against MDR enteric bacteria. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1848–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bahmani, M.; Taherikalani, M.; Khaksarian, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M.; Ashrafi, B.; Nazer, M.; Rashidipour, M. The synergistic effect of hydroalcoholic extracts of Origanum vulgare, Hypericum perforatum and their active components carvacrol and hypericin against Staphylococcus aureus. Future Sci. 2019, 5, FSO371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Keawchai, K.; Chumkaew, P.; Permpoonpattana, P.; Srisawat, T. Synergistic effect of Hydnophytum formicarum tuber and Vatica diospyroides Symington cotyledon extracts with ampicillin on pathogenic bacteria. J. Appl. Biol. 2022, 10, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  77. Silva, D.M.; Costa, P.A.; Ribon, A.B.; Purgato, G.A.; Gaspar, D.M.; Diaz, M.A. Plant Extracts Display Synergism with Different Classes of Antibiotics. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2019, 91, e20180117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Melguizo-Rodríguez, L.; García-Recio, E.; Ruiz, C.; De Luna-Bertos, E.; Illescas-Montes, R.; Costela-Ruiz, V.J. Biological properties and therapeutic applications of garlic and its components. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 2415–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rana, S.; Chauhan, P. Spices that heal: Review on untapped potential of lesser-known spices as immunity booster during COVID-19 pandemic. Ann. Phytomedicine 2022, 11, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mei, J.; Zhao, F.; Xu, R.; Huang, Y. A review on the application of spectroscopy to the condiments detection: From safety to authenticity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 6374–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Long, Y.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Chen, J. Valorization of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) rhizome: Effect of different drying methods on antioxidant capacity and physical properties. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 1609–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Global Industry Analysts. Condiments Market—Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact and Forecasts (2022–2029). Available online: https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/condiments-market/148426/#:~:text=Condiments%20Market%20Segment%20Analysis%3A&text=The%20Food%20Chain%20Service%20segment,dressing%20markets%20in%20the%20world (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  83. Hussain, Y.; Alam, W.; Ullah, H.; Dacrema, M.; Daglia, M.; Khan, H.; Arciola, C.R. Antimicrobial Potential of Curcumin: Therapeutic Potential and Challenges to Clinical Applications. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thimmulappa, R.K.; Mudnakudu-Nagaraju, K.K.; Shivamallu, C.; Subramaniam, K.T.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Bhojraj, S.; Kuppusamy, G. Antiviral and immunomodulatory activity of curcumin: A case for prophylactic therapy for COVID-19. Heliyon 2021, 7, 6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Babaei, F.; Nassiri-asl, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Curcumin (a constituent of turmeric): New treatment option against COVID-19. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 5215–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pawar, K.S.; Mastud, R.N.; Pawar, S.K.; Pawar, S.S.; Bhoite, R.R.; Bhoite, R.R.; Kulkarni, M.V.; Deshpande, A.R. Oral Curcumin with Piperine as Adjuvant Therapy for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 669362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ahmadi, R.; Salari, S.; Sharifi, M.D.; Reihani, H.; Rostamiani, M.B.; Behmadi, M.; Elyasi, S. Oral nano-curcumin formulation efficacy in the management of mild to moderate outpatient COVID-19: A randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 4068–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Saber-Moghaddam, N.; Salari, S.; Hejazi, S.; Amini, M.; Taherzadeh, Z.; Eslami, S.; Elyasi, S. Oral nano-curcumin formulation efficacy in management of mild to moderate hospitalized coronavirus disease-19 patients: An open label nonrandomized clinical trial. Phytother Res. 2022, 35, 2616–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Abbasifard, M.; Rahimi-Bashar, F.; Guest, P.C.; Majeed, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Sahebkar, A. Effectiveness of Curcumin on Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, X.; Chen, L.; Hu, C.; Fast, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, B.; Kan, J.; Du, J. Curcumin attenuates poly(I:C)-induced immune and inflammatory responses in mouse macrophages by inhibiting TLR3/TBK1/IFNB cascade. J. Funct. Foods. 2022, 33, 104949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mahmoud, D.B.; Bakr, M.M.; Al-karmalawy, A.A. Scrutinizing the Feasibility of Nonionic Surfactants to Form Isotropic Bicelles of Curcumin: A Potential Antiviral Candidate Against COVID-19. AAPS PharmSciTech 2022, 23, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Alici, H.; Tahtaci, H.; Demir, K. Design and various in silico studies of the novel curcumin derivatives as potential candidates against COVID-19—Associated main enzymes. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2022, 98, 107657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rampogu, S.; Lee, G.; Park, J.S.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, M.O. Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Discover Curcumin Analogue as a Plausible Dual Inhibitor for SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Asha, D.; Kushwaha, K.; Mishra, P.; Mrinalini, S.; Lilly, G.; Deepika, S. Nanocurcumin formulation: A possible therapeutic agent for post COVID inflammatory syndrome. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2022, 44, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  95. Soleymani, S.; Naghizadeh, A.; Karimi, M. COVID-19: General strategies for herbal therapies. J. Evid.-Based Integr. Med. 2022, 27, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kiraç, H.; Dalda, S.A.; Coskun, O.F. Morphological and molecular characterization of garlic (Allium sativum L.) genotypes sampled from Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2022, 69, 1833–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kiymaci, M.E.; Kaskatepe, B. Assessment of Cinnamon as an Antimicrobial Agent. In Promising Antimicrobials from Natural Products; Rai, M., Kosalec, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 4, pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gidwani, B.; Bhattacharya, R.; Shukla, S.S.; Pandey, R.K. Indian spices: Past, present and future challenges as the engine for bio-enhancement of drugs: Impact of COVID-19. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 3065–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mir, S.A.; Firoz, A.; Alaidarous, M.; Alshehri, B.; Dukhyil, A.B.; Banawas, S.; Alsagaby, A.S.; Alturaiki, W.; Bhat, A.G.; Kashoo, F.; et al. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors from the major phytochemicals of Nigella sativa: An in silico approach. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bharathi, M.; Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Kesika, P.; Thangaleela, S.; Chaiyasut, C. In Silico Screening of Potential Phytocompounds from Several Herbs against SARS-CoV-2 Indian Delta Variant B.1.617.2 to Inhibit the Spike Glycoprotein Trimer. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chinnaiyan, S.K.; Pandiyan, R.; Natesan, S.; Chindam, S.; Gouti, A.K.; Sugumaran, A. Fabrication of basil oil Nanoemulsion loaded gellan gum hydrogel—Evaluation of its antibacterial and anti-biofilm potential. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 68, 1773–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zrig, A. The Effect of Phytocompounds of Medicinal Plants on Coronavirus (2019-NCOV) Infection. Pharm. Chem. J. 2022, 55, 1080–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Santos, S.; Barata, P.; Charmier, A. Cannabidiol and Terpene Formulation Reducing SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity Tackling a Therapeutic Strategy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 841459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ali, S.; Alam, M.; Khatoon, F.; Fatima, U.; Elasbali, A.M.; Adnan, M.; Islam, A.; Hassan, M.I.; Snoussi, M. Natural products can be used in therapeutic management of COVID-19: Probable mechanistic insights. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 147, 112658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bhatwalkar, S.B.; Mondal, R.; Krishna, S.B.N.; Adam, J.K.; Govender, P.; Anupam, R. Antibacterial properties of organosulfur compounds of garlic (Allium sativum). Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 613077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Torres, K.A.D.M.; Lima, S.M.R.R.; Torres, L.M.B.; Gamberini, M.T.; Silva, J.P.I.D. Garlic: An alternative treatment for group B Streptococcus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, 121–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rouf, R.; Uddin, S.J.; Sarker, D.K.; Islam, M.T.; Ali, E.S.; Shilpi, J.A.; Sarker, S.D. Antiviral potential of garlic (Allium sativum) and its organosulfur compounds: A systematic update of pre-clinical and clinical data. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 104, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Thuy, B.T.P.; My, T.T.A.; Hai, N.T.T.; Hieu, L.T.; Hoa, T.T.; Thi, P.L.; Nhung, N.T.A. Investigation into SARS-CoV-2 resistance of compounds in garlic essential oil. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 8312–8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Garg, M.; Sharma, A.; Vats, S.; Tiwari, V.; Kumari, A.; Mishra, V.; Krishania, M. Vitamins in Cereals: A Critical Review of Content, Health Effects, Processing Losses, Bioaccessibility, Fortification, and Biofortification Strategies for Their Improvement. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 586815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zaer, A.M.; Norouzi, F.; Askari, V.R.; Khazdair, M.R.; Roshan, M.; Boskabady, M.; Hosseini, M.; Boskabady, M.H. The protective effect of Nigella sativa extract on lung inflammation and oxidative stress induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 253, 112653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Koshak, A.E.; Koshak, E.A. Nigella sativa l. as a potential phytotherapy for COVID-19: A mini-review of in-silico studies. CTR 2020, 93, 100602. [Google Scholar]
  112. Islam, M.N.; Hossain, K.S.; Sarker, P.P.; Ferdous, J.; Hannan, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Uddin, M.J. Revisiting pharmacological potentials of Nigella sativa seed: A promising option for COVID-19 prevention and cure. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 1329–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Prasanth, D.S.N.B.K.; Murahari, M.; Chandramohan, V.; Panda, S.P.; Atmakuri, L.R.; Guntupalli, C. In silico identification of potential inhibitors from Cinnamon against main protease and spike glycoprotein of SARS CoV-2. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 39, 4618–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. D’aquila, P.; Paparazzo, E.; Crudo, M.; Bonacci, S.; Procopio, A.; Passarino, G.; Bellizzi, D. Antibacterial Activity and Epigenetic Remodeling of Essential Oils from Calabrian Aromatic Plants. Nutrients 2022, 14, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Qureshi, W.; Saeed, F.; Ajaz, M.; Rasool, S.A. In vitro antimicrobial, antibiofilm and antiphage activity of thyme (Thymus vulgaris). Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 22, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Rana, V.; Parama, D.; Banik, K.; Girisa, S.; Henamayee, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. COVID-19, cytokines, inflammation, and spices: How are they related? Life Sci. 2021, 284, 119201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nath, M.; Debnath, P. Therapeutic role of traditionally used Indian medicinal plants and spices in combating COVID-19 pandemic situation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 20, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  118. Singh, N.A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, N. Spices and herbs: Potential antiviral preventives and immunity boosters during COVID-19. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 2745–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kumar, B.; Zaidi, S.; Haque, S.; Dasgupta, N.; Hussain, A.; Pramodh, S.; Mishra, B.N. In silico studies reveal antiviral effects of traditional Indian spices on COVID-19. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 3462–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Devan, A.R.; Nair, B.; Kumar, A.R.; Gorantla, J.N.; Nath, L.R. Unravelling the immune modulatory effect of Indian spices to impede the transmission of COVID-19: A promising approach. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2022, 23, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Radhika, A.G.; Malik, H. Fight against COVID-19: Survey of Spices & Herbs Used in North India. Open J. Epidemiol. 2021, 11, 256–266. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sengupta, S.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Kasle, G.; Karmakar, S.; Sahu, O.; Ganguly, A.; Das Sarma, J. Potential Immunomodulatory Properties of Biologically Active Components of Spices Against SARS-CoV-2 and Pan β-Coronaviruses. Front. Cell. Infect. 2021, 11, 729622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Khasamwala, R.H.; Ranjani, S.; Nivetha, S.S.; Hemalatha, S. COVID-19: An In Silico Analysis on Potential Therapeutic Uses of Trikadu as Immune System Boosters. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rajamanickam, K.; Rathinavel, T.; Periyannan, V.; Ammashi, S.; Marimuthu, S.; Nasir Iqbal, M. Molecular insight of phytocompounds from Indian spices and its hyaluronic acid conjugates to block SARS-CoV-2 viral entry. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rajan, M.; Gupta, P.; Kumar, A. Promising antiviral molecules from ayurvedic herbs and spices against COVID-19. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2021, 27, 243–244. [Google Scholar]
  126. Ratnawatia, S.; Kumbara, A.; Pudentia, M.; Kusuma, W.; Soriente, A. The Indonesian Herbal Heritage Medicine during COVID-19 Pandemic. Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. 2021, 11, 1611–1620. [Google Scholar]
  127. Mlozi, S.H. The role of natural products from medicinal plants against COVID-19: Traditional medicine practice in Tanzania. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hajibeygi, R.; Mirghazanfari, S.M.; Pahlavani, N.; Jalil, A.T.; Alshahrani, S.H.; Rizaev, J.A.; Yekta, N.H. Effect of a diet based on Iranian traditional medicine on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2022, 55, 102179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bousquet, J.; Haahtela, T.; Blain, H.; Czarlewski, W.; Zuberbier, T.; Bedbrook, A.; Anto, J.M. Available and affordable complementary treatments for COVID-19: From hypothesis to pilot studies and the need for implementation. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2022, 12, e12127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Johnson, T.S.; Narayana, D.A. Role of Spices in Offering Natural Immunity to Fight Various Diseases. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2021, 13, 600–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Farzana, M.; Shahriar, S.; Jeba, F.R.; Tabassum, T.; Araf, Y.; Ullah, M.; Hosen, M.J. Functional food: Complementary to fight against COVID-19. Be Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of antiviral and antibiotic drugs with different mechanisms of action used in mono or combination therapy in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of antiviral and antibiotic drugs with different mechanisms of action used in mono or combination therapy in the treatment of patients with COVID-19.
Molecules 27 08210 g001
Figure 2. Comparative overview of antibiotic prescription, co-infection and secondary infection profile and geographic incidence of multidrug resistance related to COVID-19 patients.
Figure 2. Comparative overview of antibiotic prescription, co-infection and secondary infection profile and geographic incidence of multidrug resistance related to COVID-19 patients.
Molecules 27 08210 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of relevant antiviral natural products in the context of COVID-19.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of relevant antiviral natural products in the context of COVID-19.
Molecules 27 08210 g003
Figure 4. Curcumin and piperine features compatible with their use in combined pharmacotheraphy.
Figure 4. Curcumin and piperine features compatible with their use in combined pharmacotheraphy.
Molecules 27 08210 g004
Figure 5. Some key steps of SARS-CoV-2 replication, together with action sites of some drugs and spices.
Figure 5. Some key steps of SARS-CoV-2 replication, together with action sites of some drugs and spices.
Molecules 27 08210 g005
Table 1. Scope of the activity of some plants against resistant bacteria.
Table 1. Scope of the activity of some plants against resistant bacteria.
Plant Species
[Botanical Family]
Active AgainstScope of ActivityReference
Achyranthes aspera
[Amaranthaceae]
MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 6.3 ± 0.6 mm; MIC 42.0 ± 14.4 mg/mL[50]
MRPA ATCC 27853IZ 6.2 ± 0.3 mm; MIC 200.0 ± 0.0 mg/mL
MRKP ATCC 00603IZ 6.0 ± 0.0 mm; 50.0 ± 0.0 mg/mL
Acokathera oppositifolia [Apocynaceae]MRKP ATCC 33495MIC 6.25 ± 0.0 mg/mL[51]
Ageratina adenophora [Compositae]MRSA ATCC 25923IZ 10 ± 0.0 mm; MIC 12.5 mg/mL[52]
Areca catechu
[Arecaceae]
MRPA CCARM 2092IZ 6.4 ± 0.5–16.3 ± 1.5 mm; MIC 5.6 µg/mL[52]
MRAB CCARM 12005IZ 6.0 ± 0.0–17.7 ± 1.2 mm; MIC 5.6 µg/mL
Artemesia vulgaris [Compositae]MRSA ATCC 25923IZ 10 ± 0.1 mm; MIC 12.5 mg/mL[53]
Azadirachta indica
[Meliaceae]
MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 6.2 ± 0.3 mm; MIC 33.3 ± 14.4 mg/mL[50]
MRPA ATCC 27853IZ 6.4 ± 0.4 mm; MIC 50.0 ± 0.0 mg/mL
MRKP ATCC 00603IZ 6.1 ± 0.2 mm; MIC 41.7 ± 144 mg/mL
Cirsium englerianum [Asteraceae]MRSA ATCC 25923IZ 28 ± 0.04 mm; MIC 16 μg/mL[53]
Euphorbia depauperata
[Euphorbiaceae]
MRSA ATCC 25923IZ 26 ± 0.02 mm; MIC 4 μg/mL[53]
Hydrastis canadensis. [Ranunculaceae]MRSA AH1677MIC 75 µg/mL[54]
Kalanchoe fedtschenkoi
[Crassulaceae]
MRAB CDC0033MIC 256 μg/mL[55]
MREC CDC08MIC > 256 μg/mL
Lawsoniainermis
[Lythracea]
MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 15.5 ± 0.5 mm; MIC 4.2 ± 2.0 mg/mL[50]
MRPA ATCC 27853IZ 12.5 ± 0.5 mm; MIC 4.2 ± 1.8 mg/mL
MRKP ATCC 00603IZ 7.6 ± 0.5 mm; MIC 12.5 ± 0.0 mg/mL
Lippia adoensis [Verbenaceae]MRSA ATCC 25923IZ 27 ± 0.56 mm; MIC 64 μg/mL[49]
Lippia javanica [Verbenaceae]MRPA ATCC 9721MIC 6.25 ± 3.2 mg/mL[49]
Matricaria chamomilla [Asteraceae]MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 30 ± 2 mm; MIC 0.781 mg/mL[57]
MRPA ATCC 27853IZ 13.66 ± 1.52 mm; MIC 0.590 mg/mL[57]
Morella kandtiana
[Myricaceae]
MRAB CDC 0033MIC > 256 μg/mL[58]
MBKP CDC 0076MIC 256 μg/mL
Mentha sp
[Lamiaceae]
MRAB CIMIC > 2 mg/mL[59]
MRKP CIMIC >2 mg/mL
MRPA CIMIC 2 mg/mL
Ocimun basilicum
[Lamiaceae]
MRAB CIMIC > 2 mg/mL[59]
MRKP CIMIC > 2 mg/mL
MRPA CIMIC > 2 mg/mL
Oxalis corniculata [Oxalidaceae]MRKP CDC 0076IZ 11 ± 0.0 mm; MIC 25 mg/mL[53]
Plectranthus barbatus [Lamiaceae]MRAB CIMIC > 2 mg/mL[59]
MRKP CIMIC 1 mg/mL
MRPA CIMIC 2 mg/mL
Punica granatum [Punicaceae]MRKP CDC 0076IZ 19–45 ± 0.7 mm[60]
Salvia triloba [Lamiaceae]MRSA ATCC 6538 PIZ 9.5 mm[61]
Scutellaria barbata [Lamiaceae]MRAB CDC 0033IZ 14–18 ± 0.0 mm; MIC 6.4 mg/mL[62]
Thymus zygis L. [Lamiaceae]MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 75 ± 00 mm; MIC 02 ± 0.0009 μL/mL[63]
MRAB CDC 0033IZ 71.5 ± 0.1 mm; MIC 02 ± 0.001 μL/mL
Thymus willdenowii
[Lamiaceae]
MRSA ATCC 43300IZ 33 ± 0.2 mm; MIC 04 ± 00 μL/mL[63]
MRAB CDC 0033IZ 30 ± 00 mm; MIC 04 ± 0.001 μL/mL
Zanthoxylum chalybeum
[Rutaceae]
MRSA ATCC 1677MIC 16 μg/mL[58]
MREF ATCC 0044MIC 32 μg/mL
MRPA: multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa; MRAB: multidrug-resistant A. baumannii; MRE: multidrug-resistant Enterobacter ssp.; MRSA: multidrug-resistant S. aureus; MREF: multidrug-resistant E. faecium; MRKP: multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae; IZ: inhibition zone; MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; CCARM: Collection of Cultures of Antimicrobial Resistant Microbes; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; CI: clinical isolates.
Table 2. Synergy effect of plant species with antibiotics towards bacterial pathogens.
Table 2. Synergy effect of plant species with antibiotics towards bacterial pathogens.
Target PathogenPlant SpeciesSynergy EffectReference
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitansSalvadora persicaMore than doubled the activity combined with metronidazole[68]
B. cereus, S. aureus, E. coli,
and P. aeruginosa
Ficus nitidaAntibacterial activity was enhanced in the presence of tetracycline[69]
E. coli and K. pneumoniaeCentaurea damascenaSynergetic effect combined with gentamicin (ineffective for E. coli), vancomycin, ampicillin and chloramphenicol (ineffective for K. pneumoniae)[70]
MDRAB and MDRPsAPithecellobium clypeariaSynergistic effect with imipenem and tetracycline a[71]
MDRPsACoriandrum sativumSynergism in the presence of antibiotics including mezlocillin, cefoperazone, cefotaxime and levofloxacin[72]
MRSA 1485279Vernonia condensataHigh MIC reduction combined with ampicillin a[73]
Multidrug-resistant enteric bacteriaCarum copticumReduced up to 64-fold MIC against E. coli with ciprofloxacin[74]
P. mirabilisPetalostigma spp.Synergistic activity with penicillin-G, chloramphenicol and erythromycin[41]
S. aureus ATCC 12600Origanum vulgare and
Hypericum perforatum
Combined extracts (1:1) increased inhibition over 3 times more than the individual extracts[75]
S. aureus ATCC 25923 and
E. coli ATTC 25922
Vatica diospyroidesIncreased ampicillin efficacy; reduced the required antibiotic concentration by eight times[76]
S. aureus strains
3993 and 4125
Salvia officinalis, Senna macranthera, and Plectranthus ornatusUp to 8-fold reductions in the MIC, especially associated to ampicillin, kanamycin and gentamicin[77]
Treponema denticolaCinnamomum zeylanicumMore than doubled the activity combined with amoxicillin[68]
MDRAB: multidrug-resistant A.baumannii; MDRPsA: multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa; MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; a alteration in membrane permeability
Table 4. Traditional plant species that are promising in the search for new antiviral medicines.
Table 4. Traditional plant species that are promising in the search for new antiviral medicines.
ScopeReference
Indian Spices and Ayurvedic Herbs
Spices with anti-inflammatory properties with suggested beneficial action in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 associated cytokine storm.[116]
Spices useful for future design of new protease inhibitors effective against SARS-CoV-2.[117]
Antiviral activities of spices, herbs, and derivatives, mechanisms of action, and prospects for future studies.[118]
Mechanism of action of spices regularly used for cooking purpose to enhance the taste of food in India.[98]
In silico evaluation of Indian traditional spices with medicinal properties for their inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (SP) and main proteases (Mpro).[119]
Immune impact of various Indian spices, potential to tackle the novel coronavirus, safety and toxicity aspects.[120]
Traditional herbs used for protection against COVID-19 in North India.[121]
Modulation of host immune responses by spice-derived bioactive components with protective immunity in COVID-19.[122]
Preventive effect of Trikadu (mixture of Zingiber officinale, Piper nigrum and Piper longum) by action in the immune system.[123]
Docking of gingerol, thymol, thymohydroquinone, cyclocurcumin, hydrazinocurcumin, components of Indian medicinal plants (ginger, black cumin, turmeric) against initially deposited spike structural proteins (PDB ID 6WPT) and mutant variant D-614G (PDB ID 6XS6).[124]
Quick screening of traditional herbs/spices phytoconstituents by in silico study in polyherbal/Ayurvedic formulations.[125]
Indonesian herbal medicines
Several healthy drinks related to the COVID-19 pandemic.[126]
Tanzanian Traditional Medicine
Phytochemical screening of medicinal plants used to combat COVID-19 in Tanzania.[127]
Persian Traditional Medicine
New traditional Persian medicine-based drug, efficacy and safety assessment in COVID-19 patients with major symptoms.[128]
Other
Available and affordable complementary treatments for COVID-19.[129]
Scientific evidence on potential role of spices in offering innate and adaptive immunity to human body.[130]
Role of functional foods through modulating the host immune system and promoting the synthesis of agents effective against the coronavirus.[131]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duarte, N.B.A.; Takahashi, J.A. Plant Spices as a Source of Antimicrobial Synergic Molecules to Treat Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections. Molecules 2022, 27, 8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238210

AMA Style

Duarte NBA, Takahashi JA. Plant Spices as a Source of Antimicrobial Synergic Molecules to Treat Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duarte, Nathália Barroso Almeida, and Jacqueline Aparecida Takahashi. 2022. "Plant Spices as a Source of Antimicrobial Synergic Molecules to Treat Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238210

APA Style

Duarte, N. B. A., & Takahashi, J. A. (2022). Plant Spices as a Source of Antimicrobial Synergic Molecules to Treat Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections. Molecules, 27(23), 8210. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238210

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop