Next Article in Journal
New Pyrimidine-5-Carbonitriles as COX-2 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Screening, Molecular Docking, and In Silico ADME Profile Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel In Situ Growth of ZIF-8 in Porous Epoxy Matrix for Mechanically Robust Composite Electrolyte of High-Performance, Long-Life Lithium Metal Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, and Bioassay of 2′-Modified Kanamycin A
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distinct Antifouling Mechanisms on Different Chain Densities of Zwitterionic Polymers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High-Temperature Magnesiothermic Reduction Enables HF-Free Synthesis of Porous Silicon with Enhanced Performance as Lithium-Ion Battery Anode

Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7486; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217486
by Xiuxia Zuo 1, Qinghua Yang 2, Yaolong He 2,*, Ya-Jun Cheng 1,3,*, Shanshan Yin 4, Jin Zhu 1, Peter Müller-Buschbaum 4,5 and Yonggao Xia 1,6,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7486; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217486
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 15 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Materials Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this work, authors developed a facile HF-free method to prepare the porous silicon anode for high-performance Lithium ions battery. They have discussed the impact of reduction temperature from 700 to 900 degree on the properties of porous silicon. It is explored that the 3D continuous structure formed by the magnesiothermic reduction at 800℃ and 900 ℃ can undertake the mechanical stress effectively, which is responsible for improved cyclic stability compared to the silicon synthesized at 700℃. After carefully evaluating the paper, I would like to recommend “minor revisions” due to the following reasons.

1.     In “Introduction”, the author claimed that the “…the corrosive HF etching process significantly increases the safety risk and makes it environmentally unfriendly…”, However, they use the HCl to treat the samples. As well known that the HCl is also harmful to the environment, how to explain this problem?

2.     In terms of the sample preparation, why use the HF to further treat the sample after the HCl washing?

3.     Regarding the BET analysis, the author claimed that the “the calculated specific surface area of the residual silica is around 168 m2g-1.” This makes me confusing. As I known, when we try to measure the specific surface area of the samples, the mass should be carefully measured and input to the analyzer, why do author use the mass based on the statement of “Considering that 75 % of the mass is retained after HF etching” ?

4.     How about the LIBs performance of 800-HF?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop