Next Article in Journal
A Simple Structure-Switch Aptasensor Using Label-Free Aptamer for Fluorescence Detection of Aflatoxin B1
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of CB2-Receptor Ligands on the Memory-Related Responses in Connection with Cholinergic Pathways in Mice in the Passive Avoidance Test
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Pharmacokinetics in Mice and Cell Uptake of Thymus Immunosuppressive Pentapeptide Using LC-MS/MS Analysis

Molecules 2022, 27(13), 4256; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134256
by Shang Chen 1, Chenyan Ren 1, Yuan Ji 2, Dongke Liu 1, Xinke Zhang 3,* and Fengshan Wang 1,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2022, 27(13), 4256; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134256
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 26 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Chen and coworkers performed nice work by developing an effective LC/MS method and applying it to examine the pharmacokinetics of an immunosuppressive pentapeptide in subcutaneous mice and in cultured cells. The experiments are well designed and contain meaningful controls. The data are solid, presented clearly, and support the conclusions. The results on pharmacokinetics are very interesting and important.

Minor critics:

The image resolution of figures 2 and S1 was poor and should be improved.

Figure 2 legend: better explain what is exactly the “IS”.

Page 4, line 108: change ‘protonate’ to ‘protonation’

Page 9, line 220, change the word aggregate to either enrichment or concentration.

Figure 6: what is the difference between control and model?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors describe a novel LC-MS/MS method for quantification of the pentapeptide TIPP that was validated followinf FDA guidelines and successfully applied to a PK analysis of TIPP in mice. The paper is very well written, the method development experiments  are well described and validation protocol was complete. The manuscript can be considered acceptable in its present form with any revision required.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you very much for your kind comments on our manuscript. There is no doubt that these are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our manuscript.

 If you have any questions, please contact us without hesitation.

Yours sincerely,

Professor Fengshan Wang

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop