Next Article in Journal
Non-Occupational Exposure to Pesticides: Experimental Approaches and Analytical Techniques (from 2019)
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Phenylpropanoids and Flavonoids in Plant Resistance to Pests and Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Multiple Scale Fibrous and Composite Systems for Heating Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
COVID-19, Chloroquine Repurposing, and Cardiac Safety Concern: Chirality Might Help
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules26123684
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Furanocoumarins from Ruta chalepensis with Amebicide Activity

by
Aldo Fabio Bazaldúa-Rodríguez
1,
Ramiro Quintanilla-Licea
1,*,
María Julia Verde-Star
1,
Magda Elizabeth Hernández-García
2,
Javier Vargas-Villarreal
3 and
Jesús Norberto Garza-González
4
1
Laboratorio de Fitoquímica, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás de los Garza C.P. 66455, Nuevo León, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Fisiología Celular y Molecular, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas del Noreste (CIBIN), Dos de Abril Esquina con San Luis Potosí, Monterrey C.P. 64720, Nuevo León, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Biología y Fisiología Molecular y Celular, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas del Noreste (CIBIN), Dos de Abril Esquina con San Luis Potosí, Monterrey C.P. 64720, Nuevo León, Mexico
4
Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad de Monterrey, Av. Ignacio Morones Prieto 4500 Pte., San Pedro Garza García C.P. 66238, Nuevo León, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(12), 3684; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123684
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 6 June 2021 / Accepted: 13 June 2021 / Published: 16 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biologically Active Small Molecules Inspired by Plant Secondary Metabolites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Entamoeba histolytica (protozoan; family Endomoebidae) is the cause of amoebiasis, a disease related to high morbidity and mortality. Nowadays, this illness is considered a significant public health issue in developing countries. In addition, parasite resistance to conventional medicinal treatment has increased in recent years. Traditional medicine around the world represents a valuable source of alternative treatment for many parasite diseases. In a previous paper, we communicated about the antiprotozoal activity in vitro of the methanolic (MeOH) extract of Ruta chalepensis (Rutaceae) against E. histolytica. The plant is extensively employed in Mexican traditional medicine. The following workup of the MeOH extract of R. chalepensis afforded the furocoumarins rutamarin (1) and chalepin (2), which showed high antiprotozoal activity on Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites employing in vitro tests (IC50 values of 6.52 and 28.95 µg/mL, respectively). Therefore, we offer a full scientific report about the bioguided isolation and the amebicide activity of chalepin and rutamarin.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Amoebiasis is the term for a parasitic infection triggered by the protozoan Entamoeba histolytica. This disease represents one of the most widespread parasite maladies in developing countries [1,2], making it a significant public health problem [3,4].
In Mexico, this infection is considered an endemic illness [5,6,7] and represents the most common parasitic disease found in the general population [8,9]. It is also more frequently found in the intestinal amoebiasis of Mexican children, especially newborn and school children [10].
Amoebiasis frequently produces an intestinal infection that can transform into an extra-intestinal infection throughout the portal veins, affecting the liver and producing a more significant hepatic lesion, in addition to lesions in the lungs, skin, and brain [11,12]. Following malaria, amoebiasis represents the second leading factor of death caused by parasite infections [13]. Nearly 50 million people develop acute amoebiasis, and 40,000–100,000 deaths caused by this sickness happen per year worldwide [14,15].
It is important to highlight that the chemotherapy used against E. histolytica has shown significant advancement. Nevertheless, the treatment’s abandonment produces chronic patients, illness propagators, and develops a multidrug resistance parasite [10,16].
The most utilized therapeutic drug for the medication of this infection is metronidazole, but, owing to the drug’s undesired side effects [17,18] and considering the burgeon of resistant strains of E. histolytica against it, new antiprotozoal agents are required [19,20]. Plants are a good source of natural products that have been used in the treatment of protozoa illness [21,22,23,24], and Mexican traditional medicine can offer many plants that could be useful for developing treatment against E. histolytica [25]. In a previous paper, we discussed the antiamoebic activity in vitro of the MeOH extract of Ruta chalepensis [26]. Ruta chalepensis is a Mediterranean plant introduced in Mexico and used by different ethnic groups to treat gastrointestinal illnesses such as stomachache, diarrhea, dysentery, and nausea [27]. Additionally, there are reports of emmenagogue, anthelmintic, antirheumatic, antihypertensive, abortive, and anti-inflammatory activity for this plant [28,29]. R. chalepensis possess many known furanocoumarins, coumarins, alkaloids, quinoline alkaloids, and flavonoids distributed in leaves, stems, and roots [28,30,31].
This research aims to isolate and identify substances responsible for the amebicide activity of R. Chalepensis.

2. Results

2.1. Bioguided Isolation of Furanocoumarins from Ruta chalepensis

The following diagram (Figure 1) shows the number of chromatography columns implemented (silica gel or Sephadex), as well as the percentage of inhibition against E. histolytica of the most relevant fractions during the bioguided fractionation of the MeOH extract of R. chalepensis to obtain the furanocoumarins Rutamarin (1) and Chalepin (2) in high purity (TLC; see Supplementary Materials).
Both compounds were characterized by different spectroscopic techniques.
The unambiguous assignment of the 13C-NMR spectrum of the isolated furanocoumarins was obtained from 1H-1H COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra (see Supplementary Material).
Rutamarin (1) was recovered as a white amorphous solid (m. p. 104 °C; Lit. 107–109 °C; [32]. The spectroscopy data of this compound corresponded to a previous compound reported as rutamarin, 1 [32].
Chalepin (2) was obtained as a yellow amorphous solid (m. p. 125–126 °C; Lit. 117–118 °C) [33]. The spectroscopy data of this compound corresponded to a previous compound reported as chalepin, 2 [34].
Both compounds are structurally related to chalepensin (3), a furanocoumarin also occurring in this plant [26]. See Figure 2.

2.2. Determination of IC50 for Rutamarin (1) and Chalepin (2)

The in vitro assay for the isolated furanocoumarins against trophozoites of E. histolytica showed significant activity.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the 50% inhibitory concentration of each compound calculated using a probit analysis, considering a 95% confidence level.

3. Discussion

Ruta chalepensis is a medicinal plant used worldwide for its wide range of medicinal purposes [35]. However, the antiparasitic activity against Entamoeba histolytica of this plant has not been sufficiently disclosed in ethnobotanical reports until now. Antiparasitic activity of R. chalepensis has been previously evaluated on helminths of veterinary importance [36,37] and protozoa of clinical importance such as Leishmania infantum, L. major [38] and Giardia lamblia [39,40]. The antiparasitic activity over E. histolytica by the methanolic crude extract was previously reported [26], showing moderate activity with an IC50 of 60.07 μg/mL. The antiparasitic activity of the furanocoumarin chalepensin (3), isolated from the hexane partition of R. chalepensis by Quintanilla-Licea et al. [26], was also moderate, showing an IC50 of 45.95 μg/mL. The antiamoebic activity of rutamarin (1) and chalepin (2) isolated in this research work is slightly higher (IC50 of 6.52 and 28.95 μg/mL, respectively) but far less effective than metronidazole (IC50 0.205 µg/mL) [26]. We can therefore consider the three furanocoumarins as responsible for the antiparasitic activity of R. chalepensis. Furanocoumarins are part of the chemical components with the most significant presence in R. chalepensis [41]. Rutamarin (1) and chalepin (2) have been previously isolated from this plant [42]; our research group briefly described the amebicide activity of these furanocoumarins at a scientific congress [43,44]. We are now offering a full scientific report about the bioguided isolation and identification of these amebicide compounds. These results may support the use of R. chalepensis as an alternative treatment for amoebiasis in traditional Mexican medicine, as it is for other plants of equal importance [45,46]. The toxic activity of coumarins on eukaryotic cells has received an important analysis suggesting a partial mechanism of action for compounds of this nature where cell injury is caused by damage to DNA [47]. Chalepin (2) has shown specific toxicity on normal cells and cancer cell lines, for example HT29 human colon carcinoma cells with cytotoxic activity by 55.1 μM. Although rutamarin (1), in some analyses, showed selectivity with its cytotoxic activity at a concentration of 1.12 μM, it was also reported that it generates significant alterations in the cell growth of BCBL-1 cells at a concentration of 5.60 μM [48,49]. A certain toxicity on normal mammalian cells at the respective concentrations of the IC50 of compounds 1 and 2 (18.29 and 92.08 μM, respectively) could be expected. The furanocoumarins isolated from R. chalepensis (1-3) have outstanding antiamoebic activity, but the presence of an acetyl group in rutmarin may increase the antiparasitic activity, producing a better complex with DNA and therefore causing more considerable cellular damage [47].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedures

NMR spectra were acquired on an Avance DPX 400 Spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) working at 400.13 MHz for 1H and 100.61 MHz for 13C. Melting points were measured on Electrothermal 9100 equipment (Electrothermal Engineering Ltd., Southend-on-Sea, UK).
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was developed on pre-coated silica gel plates (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA Silica Gel 60 F254). Visualization of the components of the crude extract or pure compounds was made using UV light. Open column chromatography was implemented with silica gel of a 60–200 mesh (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) and Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, LH20100-500G).

4.2. Plant Material

R. chalepensis, L. Rutaceae was collected near the city of Aramberri, Nuevo León State in northern Mexico, 24°19′13″ N, 99°54′55″ W. It was dried using a light chamber at 38 °C and was then powdered with a manual grain. Plant material was placed at the herbarium of the Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas in the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, with a register number 025579.

4.3. Drugs and Reagents

The bioassay was made in the PEHPS medium, provided by the Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste, IMSS [50]. CTR® Scientific (Mexico) purchased organic solvents: n-hexane, chloroform (CHCl3), Ethyl acetate (EtOAc), Methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

4.4. Extraction of Plant Material from R. chalepensis

Six hundred grams of leaves and stems from R. chalepensis were dried and powdered, separated in packets of 60 g, and subjected to extraction with 600 mL of MeOH, each using Soxhlet equipment for 40 h. The MeOH was eliminated in a rotary evaporator. The crude extract was preserved at 4 °C until it was needed.

4.5. Parasite and In Vitro Amebicide Assay

4.5.1. Microorganisms

The trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica (strain HM-1:IMSS) were acquired from the Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste (CIBIN) microorganism culture collection in Monterrey (Mexico). The parasites were grown axenically and kept up in peptone combined with pancreas extract, liver extract and bovine serum (PEHPS medium, so designated based on the Spanish initials of its major components). The microorganisms were utilized at the log phase of growth (2 × 104 cells/mL) by all of the tests carried out [51,52].
Next, 2 × 105 trophozoites of E. histolytica in 5 mL of the PEHPS medium (with the 10% bovine serum added) were inoculated in 13 mm × 100 mm screw cap test tubes and incubated at 36.5 °C for 120 h to establish the growth curve for E. histolytica. Every 24 h, the number of trophozoites was evaluated to determine the medium’s growth parameters [53]. The procedure was performed in 3 separate assays per triplicate.

4.5.2. In Vitro Test for Entamoeba histolytica

Each sample was dissolved in the DMSO and standardized to 150 µg/mL by adding a mixture of E. histolytica trophozoites at a logarithmic phase in the PEHPS medium with the 10% bovine serum. Afterward, vials were incubated for 72 h and then introduced into iced water for 20 min. The number of dead trophozoites per milliliter was estimated by using a hemocytometer. Each assay was implemented in triplicate. The positive control was metronidazole. The negative control was an E. histolytica suspension in the PEHPS medium with no extract added. The percentage of inhibition was determined by evaluating the number of dead trophozoites in the samples and the negative controls [53].

4.5.3. In Vitro IC50 Evaluation

Each sample was dissolved in the DMSO and standardized to 150, 75, 37.5, 18.75, and 9.375 µg/mL by adding a mixture of E. histolytica trophozoites at a logarithmic phase in the PEHPS medium with the 10% bovine serum. Afterward, vials were incubated for 72 h and then introduced into iced water for 20 min. The number of dead trophozoites per milliliter was estimated by using a hemocytometer. Each assay was implemented in triplicate. The positive control was Metronidazole. The negative control was an E. histolytica suspension in the PEHPS medium with no extract added. The percentage of inhibition was determined by evaluating the number of dead trophozoites in the samples and the negative controls. The 50% inhibitory concentration of each sample was determined using a probit analysis, taking into account a 95% confidence level [53].

4.6. Bioassay-guided Fractionation

The crude MeOH extract of R. chalepensis (124 g) with an amebicide activity of 90.50% at 150 µg/mL [26] was dissolved again in one L methanol and distributed into four portions of 250 mL, each to make a liquid–liquid partition with n-hexane (750 mL each portion). The hexane partition was evaporated under vacuum. Column chromatography on the silica gel of this hexane residuum led to the isolation of chalepensin (3), Figure 1 [26]. The MeOH phase was then concentrated under vacuum until obtaining 50 mL and was added drop by drop into 200 mL of distilled water under continuous agitation. The resulting suspension was put through a liquid–liquid partition with EtOAc (750 mL). After EtOAc evaporation, 20.0 g of a resin with a good amebicide activity (84.82% of growth inhibition at 150 µg/mL) was obtained. The EtOAc partition was distributed in ten portions of 2 g; each one were subjected to open column chromatography (30 cm × 2 cm) on the silica gel (25 g each), eluting with stepwise gradients of CHCl3-EtOAc (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 30:70, 20:80, 10:90, 0:100 v/v, each at 50 mL) and EtOAc-MeOH (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50 v/v, each at 50 mL). All fractions obtained were gathered and pooled based on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile to yield nine fractions (A1-A9). The in vitro amebicide assay exhibited that A3 and A4 had the highest growth of inhibition (95.84% and 94.18%, respectively). The fraction A3 (1.55 g) was subjected to open column chromatography on the silica gel, eluting with gradients of CHCl3-EtOAc (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40.60 v/v; each at 50 mL). The fractions were gathered and pooled based on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile in five fractions (B1–B5). The fraction B2 (716 mg) with the best amebicide activity (an 81.75% growth inhibition) was submitted to open column chromatography on the silica gel, eluting with gradients of CHCl3-EtOAc (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40.60, 30:70, 20:80, 10:90, 0:100 v/v; each at 50 mL). The fractions obtained were collected and pooled on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile in four fractions (C1–C4). The fraction C2 (540 mg, a 92.01% growth inhibition) was submitted to open column chromatography on the silica gel, eluting with gradients of CHCl3-EtOAc (100:0, 99:01, 95:05, 90:10, 85:15, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40 v/v; each at 50 mL). The fractions obtained were collected and pooled on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile in three fractions (D1–D3). The fraction D2 (499 mg, an 86.72% growth inhibition) was subjected to crystallization in methanol, obtaining a white amorphous solid (365 mg, an 88.56% growth inhibition), which was submitted to open column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20, eluting with MeOH. The fractions obtained were gathered and pooled on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile in five fractions (E1–E5). Fraction E2 afforded 252 mg pure rutamarin (1), Figure 2, with a 90.03% growth inhibition. IC50 = 6.52 µg/mL (18.29 µM). Rf = 0.66 (CHCl3:EtOAc, 9.5:0.5).
The fraction A4 (476 mg) with an 94.18% of amebicide activity was submitted to open column chromatography on the silica gel, eluting with stepwise gradients of CHCl3-EtOAc (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, v/v, each at 50 mL). The obtained fractions were collected and pooled using the information obtained from their TLC profile in six fractions (F1–F6). The fraction F4 (193 mg, an 89.43% growth inhibition) was subjected to open column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20, using methanol as an eluent. The fractions obtained were collected and pooled on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9:1) profile into four fractions (G1–G4). The fraction G2 (81 mg, a 90.41% growth inhibition) was submitted to open column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20, using methanol as an eluent. The fractions obtained were collected and pooled on their TLC (CHCl3-EtOAc; 9.5:0.5) profile in four fractions (H1-H3). Fraction H2 afforded 66 mg pure chalepin (2), Figure 3, with a 94.50% growth inhibition. IC50 = 28.95 µg/mL (92.08 µM). Rf = 0.38 (CHCl3:EtOAc, 9:1).

5. Conclusions

This study describes the bioguided isolation [54] of two amebicide constituents of R. chalepensis. The furanocoumarins rutamarin (1) and chalepin (2) represent the most active chemical components of R. chalepensis against the protozoa E. histolytica with IC50 values of 6.52 and 28.95 μg/mL, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the amebicide activity of chalepin and rutamarin. Even though the amebicide activity of both compounds are far less effective than metronidazole (IC50 0.205 µg/mL), the IC50 values obtained in our research for rutamarin and chalepin may also be used as the basis for incorporating Ruta chalepensis extracts into conventional and complementary medicine for the therapy of amoebiasis and other infectious diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: Supplementary spectroscopic data. Figure S1. 1H-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S2. Expansion in the area from 1.2–3.4 ppm. 1H-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S3. Expansion in the area from 4.8–7.6 ppm. 1H-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S4. COSY spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S5. 13C-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 100 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S6. Expansion in the area from 0.5–60 ppm 13C-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 100 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S7. DEPT 135 spectrum from 13C-NMR spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 100 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S8. HSQC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S9. Expansion in the area 1H: 1.3–3.4 ppm, 13C: 15–45 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S10. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.6–8.0 ppm, 13C: 20–50 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S11. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.6–8.0 ppm, 13C: 80–150 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S12. Expansion in the area 1H: 0.8–2.6 ppm, 13C: 15–50 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S13. Expansion in the area 1H: 0.4–3.5 ppm, 13C: 80–106 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S14. Expansion in the area 1H: 0.4–3.4 ppm, 13C: 110–190 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S15. Expansion in the area 1H: 1.8–8.0 ppm, 13C: 70–105 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S16. Expansion in the area 1H: 2.5–8.0 ppm, 13C: 110–175 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 1. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S17. 1H-NMR spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S18. Expansion in the area from 2.5–8.0 ppm. 1H-NMR spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S19. COSY spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S20. Expansion in the area 1H: 5.6–8.0 ppm, 1H: 5.6–8.0 ppm. COSY spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S21. 13C-NMR spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 100 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S22. DEPT 135 spectrum from 13C-NMR spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 100 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S23. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S24. Expansion in the area 1H: 1.0–3.4 ppm, 13C: 15–50 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S25. Expansion in the area 1H: 1.0–3.4 ppm, 13C: 15–50 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S26. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.0–7.5 ppm, 13C: 85–120 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S27. Expansion in the area 1H: 3.6–6.0 ppm, 13C: 95–120 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S28. Expansion in the area 1H: 6.8–8.0 ppm, 13C: 130–170 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S29. Expansion in the area 1H: 5.6–8.2 ppm, 13C: 130–170 ppm. HSQC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S30. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S31. Expansion in the area 1H: 0.9–1.9 ppm, 13C: 20–45 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S32. Expansion in the area 1H: 1.0–3.4 ppm, 13C: 70–130 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S33. Expansion in the area 1H: 0.9–1.8 ppm, 13C: 120–185 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S34. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.6–7.6 ppm, 13C: 20–50 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S35. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.6–8.5 ppm, 13C: 70–128 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S36. Expansion in the area 1H: 4.6–7.6 ppm, 13C: 120–165 ppm. HMBC spectrum of 2. Obtained by a Bruker Spectrometer Model Advance DPX400, 9.4 Teslas. Operating frequency 400 MHz. (CDCl3), Figure S37. NMR Data of Rutamarin (1) and Chalepin (2), Figure S38. Antiprotozoal activity of Rutamarin (1) against trophozoite of E. histolytica. T = negative control consisting of culture medium and parasites, Figure S39. Antiprotozoal activity of Chalepin) (2) against trophozoite of E. histolytica. T = negative control consisting of culture medium and parasites, Figure S40. General scheme for the bioguided isolation of compounds with antiamoebic activity from Ruta chalepensis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Q.-L. and A.F.B.-R.; Investigation, J.V.-V., M.J.V.-S., M.E.H.-G., and J.N.G.-G.; Writing—review and editing, R.Q.-L. and A.F.B.-R., R.Q.-L. conceived and designed the experiments; R.Q.-L., A.F.B.-R. and M.J.V.-S. performed the extraction and isolation; R.Q.-L. and A.F.B.-R. performed the spectral analysis and structure determination; J.V.-V., M.E.H.-G., and J.N.G.-G. conceived, designed, and performed the antiprotozoal assay; R.Q.-L., and A.F.B.-R. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge CONACYT (Mexico) for the doctoral fellowship awarded to Aldo Fabio Bazaldúa Rodríguez and the support given throughout the development of this research project. We also thank Benito David Mata-Cardenas and Javier Vargas-Villarreal for providing the protozoa E. histolytica used in this research. We thank H. Laatsch of the University of Göttingen (Germany) for the spectroscopic measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Carrero, J.C.; Reyes-López, M.; Serrano-Luna, J.; Shibayama, M.; Unzueta, J.; León-Sicairos, N.; de la Garza, M. Intestinal amoebiasis: 160 years of its first detection and still remains as a health problem in developing countries. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 310, 15138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Da-Silva-Alves, E.B.; Conceição, M.J.; Silva, V.L.; Monteiro-Fonseca, A.B.; Leles, D. What is the future of intestinal parasitic diseases in developing countries? Acta Trop. 2017, 171, 6–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Babuta, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Bhattacharya, A. Entamoeba histolytica and pathogenesis: A calcium connection. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Manna, D.; Ehrenkaufer, G.M.; Lozano-Amado, D.; Singh, U. Entamoeba stage conversion: Progress and new insights. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caballero-Salcedo, A.; Viveros-Rogel, M.; Salvatierra, B.; Tapia-Conyer, R.; Sepulveda-Amor, J.; Gutierrez, G.; Ortiz-Ortiz, L. Seroepidemiology of amebiasis in Mexico. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1994, 50, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramos, F.; Morán, P.; González, E.; García, G.; Ramiro, M.; Gómez, A.; García De León, M.D.C.; Melendro, E.I.; Valadez, A.; Ximénez, C. High Prevalence Rate of Entamoeba histolytica asymptomatic infection in a rural Mexican community. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 73, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Azam, A.; Agarwal, S. Targeting amoebiasis: Status and developments. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2007, 3, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Davila-Gutierrez, C.E.; Vasquez, C.; Trujillo-Hernandez, B.; Huerta, M. Nitazoxanide compared with quinfamide and mebendazole in the treatment of helminthic infections and intestinal protozoa in children. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2002, 66, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Moran, P.; Ramos, F.; Ramiro, M.; Curiel, O.; González, E.; Valadez, A.; Gómez, A.; García, G.; Melendro, E.I.; Ximénez, C. Entamoeba histolytica and/or entamoeba dispar: Infection frequency in HIV+/AIDS patients in Mexico city. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 110, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Romero-Cabello, R.; Roberto-Guerrero, L.; Martínez-Barbosa, I.; Vázquez-Tsuji, O.; Ruiz-Sánchez, D.; Tay-Zavala, J.; Sánchez-Vega, J.T.; Calderón-Romero, L. Evaluation of the efficacy and security of quinfamide administered in a single dose of 300 mg in adult patients with intestinal amebiasis. Parasitol. Latinoam. 2005, 60, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. González-Vázquez, M.C.; Carabarin-Lima, A.; Baylón-Pacheco, L.; Talamás-Rohana, P.; Rosales-Encina, J.L. Obtaining of three recombinant antigens of Entamoeba histolytica and evaluation of their immunogenic ability without adjuvant in a hamster model of immunoprotection. Acta Trop. 2012, 122, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salles, J.M.; Moraes, L.A.; Salles, M.C. Hepatic amebiasis. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 7, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aguilar-Rojas, A.; Olivo-Marin, J.C.; Guillen, N. The motility of Entamoeba histolytica: Finding ways to understand intestinal amoebiasis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016, 34, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Institut-Pasteur Amoebiasis. Available online: https://www.pasteur.fr/en/medical-center/disease-sheets/amoebiasis-0 (accessed on 6 January 2021).
  15. Uddin, M.J.; Leslie, J.L.; Petri, W.A., Jr. Host protective mechanisms to intestinal amebiasis. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Orozco, E.; López, C.; Gómez, C.; Pérez, D.G.; Marchat, L.; Bañuelos, C.; Delgadillo, D.M. Multidrug resistance in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Parasitol. Int. 2002, 51, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Motazedian, M.H.; Mohammadpour, N.; Khabnadideh, S. Efficacy of some metronidazole derivatives against Giardia lamblia, in vivo study. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2015, 1, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bendesky, A.; Menéndez, D. Metronidazol: Una visión integral. Rev. Fac. Med. UNAM 2001, 44, 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wassmann, C.; Hellberg, A.; Tannich, E.; Bruchhaus, I. Metronidazole resistance in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica is associated with increased expression of iron-containing superoxide dismutase and peroxiredoxin and decreased expression of ferredoxin 1 and flavin reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 26051–26056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bansal, D.; Malla, N.; Mahajam, R.C. Drug resistance in amoebiasis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2006, 123, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  21. Calzada, F.; Meckes, M.; Mata, R. Screening of Mexican medicinal plants for antiprotozoal activity. Pharm. Biol. 1998, 36, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tapia-Pérez, M.E.; Tapia-Contreras, A.; Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Osuna, L.; Meckes, M. Screening of Mexican medicinal plants for antiprotozoal activity—Part II. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bautista, E.; Calzada, F.; Yépez-Mulia, L.; Bedolla-García, B.Y.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Pastor-Palacios, G.; González-Juárez, D.E. Salvia connivens, a source of bioactive flavones with amoebicidal and giardicidal activity. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2020, 30, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martínez-Castillo, M.; Pacheco-Yepez, J.; Flores-Huerta, N.; Guzmán-Téllez, P.; Jarillo-Luna, R.A.; Cárdenas-Jaramillo, L.M.; Campos-Rodríguez, R.; Shibayama, M. Flavonoids as a natural treatment against Entamoeba histolytica. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Calzada, F.; Bautista, E. Plants used for the treatment of diarrhoea from Mexican flora with amoebicidal and giadicidal activity, and their phytochemical constituents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 253, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quintanilla-Licea, R.; Mata-Cárdenas, B.D.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; Bazaldúa-Rodríguez, A.F.; Ángeles-Hernández, I.K.; Garza-González, J.N.; Hernández-García, M.E. Antiprotozoal activity against Entamoeba histolytica of plants used in northeast Mexican traditional medicine. Bioactive compounds from Lippia graveolens and Ruta chalepensis. Molecules 2014, 19, 21044–21065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heinrich, M.; Ankli, A.; Frei, B.; Weimann, C.; Sticher, O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 47, 1859–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mejri, J.; Abderrabba, M.; Mejri, M. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Ruta chalepensis L: Influence of drying, hydro-distillation duration and plant parts. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32, 671–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gonzales, J.; Benavides, V.; Rojas, R.; Pino, J. Efecto embriotóxico y teratogénico de Ruta chalepensis L. «ruda», en ratón (Mus musculus). Rev. Peru. Biol. 2006, 13, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El Sayed, K.; Al-Said, M.S.; El-Feraly, F.S.; Ross, S.A. New quinoline alkaloids from Ruta chalepensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 995–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ulubelen, A.; Öztürk, M. Alkaloids and coumarins from Ruta species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2006, 1, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, T.S.; Shi, L.S.; Wang, J.J.; Iou, S.C.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, Y.P.; Kuo, Y.H.; Chang, Y.L.; Teng, C.M. Cytotoxic and antiplatelet aggregation principles of Ruta graveolens. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2003, 50, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ezmirly, S.T.; Wilson, S.R. Saudi Arabian medicinal plants I: Ruta chalepensis. J. Chem. 1980, 2, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  34. Richardson, J.S.M.; Sethi, G.; Lee, G.S.; Malek, S.N.A. Chalepin: Isolated from Ruta angustifolia L. pers induces mitochondrial mediated apoptosis in lung carcinoma cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Coimbra, A.T.; Ferreira, S.; Duarte, A.P. Genus Ruta: A natural source of high value products with biological and pharmacological properties. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 260, 113076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Akkari, H.; Ezzine, O.; Dhahri, S.; Rekik, M.; Hajaji, S.; Aziz Darghouth, M.; Lahbib Ben Jamâa, M.; Gharbi, M. Chemical composition, insecticidal and in vitro anthelmintic activities of Ruta chalepensis (Rutaceae) essential oil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ortu, E.; Sanna, G.; Scala, A.; Pulina, G.; Caboni, P.; Battacone, G. In vitro anthelmintic activity of active compounds of the fringed rue Ruta chalepensis against dairy ewe gastrointestinal nematodes. J. Helminthol. 2017, 91, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ben Hadj Ahmed, S.; Sghaier, R.M.; Guesmi, F.; Kaabi, B.; Mejri, M.; Attia, H.; Laouini, D.; Smaali, I. Evaluation of antileishmanial, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of essential oils extracted from plants issued from the leishmaniasis-endemic region of Sned (Tunisia). Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 25, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Calzada, F.; Meckes, M.; Cedillo-Rivera, R. Antiamoebic and antigiardial activity of plant flavonoids. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calzada, F.; Yépez-Mulia, L.; Aguilar, A. In vitro susceptibility of Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia to plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Günaydin, K.; Savci, S. Phytochemical studies on Ruta chalepensis (LAM.) lamarck. Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ulubelen, A.; Terem, B.; Tuzlaci, E.; Cheng, K.F.; Kong, Y.C. Alkaloids and coumarins from Ruta chalepensis. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 2692–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quintanilla-Licea, R.; Mata-Cárdenas, B.D.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; Bazaldúa-Rodríguez, A.F.; Verde-Star, M.J. Antiprotozoal activity against Entamoeba histolytica of furocoumarins isolated from Ruta chalepensis. Planta Med. 2016, 81, S1–S381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nahar, L.; Al-Majmaie, S.; Al-Groshi, A.; Rasul, A.; Sarker, S.D. Chalepin and chalepensin: Occurrence, biosynthesis and therapeutic potential. Molecules 2021, 26, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Calzada, F.; Velázquez, C.; Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Esquivel, B. Antiprotozoal activity of the constituents of Teloxys graveolens. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 731–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Calzada, F.; Cervantes-Martínez, J.A.; Yépez-Mulia, L. In vitro antiprotozoal activity from the roots of Geranium mexicanum and its constituents on Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 98, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fadlalla, K.; Watson, A.; Yehualaeshet, T.; Turner, T.; Samuel, T. Ruta graveolens extract induces DNA damage pathways and blocks akt activation to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and survival. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu, B.; Wang, L.; González-Molleda, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Yuan, Y. Antiviral activity of (+)-Rutamarin against Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus by inhibition of the catalytic activity of human topoisomerase II. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Suhaimi, S.A.; Hong, S.L.; Malek, N.A. Rutamarin, an active constituent from Ruta angustifolia Pers., induced apoptotic cell death in the HT29 colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2017, 13, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  50. Said-Fernández, S.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; Castro-Garza, J.; Mata-Cárdenas, B.D.; Navarro-Marmolejo, L.; Lozano-Garza, G.; Martínez-Rodríguez, H. PEHPS medium: An alternative for axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and E. invadens. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 82, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mata-Cárdenas, B.D.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; González-Salazar, F.; Palacios-Corona, R.; Salvador, S.-F. A new vial microassay to screen antiprotozoal drugs. Pharmacologyonline 2008, 1, 529–537. [Google Scholar]
  52. González-Salazar, F.; Mata-Cárdenas, B.D.; Vargas-Villarreal, J. Sensibilidad de trofozoitos de Entamoeba histolytica a ivermectina. Medicina 2009, 69, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Quintanilla-Licea, R.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; Verde-Star, M.J.; Rivas-Galindo, V.M.; Torres-Hernández, Á.D. Antiprotozoal activity against Entamoeba histolytica of flavonoids isolated from Lippia graveolens kunth. Molecules 2020, 25, 2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alsayari, A.; Kopel, L.; Ahmed, M.S.; Soliman, H.S.M.; Annadurai, S.; Halaweish, F.T. Isolation of anticancer constituents from Cucumis prophetarum var. prophetarum through bioassay-guided fractionation. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 26 03684 g001 550
Figure 1. General scheme for the bioguided isolation of compounds with antiamoebic activity from Ruta chalepensis.
Figure 1. General scheme for the bioguided isolation of compounds with antiamoebic activity from Ruta chalepensis.
Molecules 26 03684 g001
Molecules 26 03684 g002 550
Figure 2. Structure of furanocoumarins isolated from Ruta chalepensis with amebicide activity.
Figure 2. Structure of furanocoumarins isolated from Ruta chalepensis with amebicide activity.
Molecules 26 03684 g002
Molecules 26 03684 g003 550
Figure 3. Antiprotozoal activity of Rutamarin 1 against Entamoeba histolytica. 90.03% Growth inhibition at 150 µg/mL, IC50 = 6.52 µg/mL (18.29 µM).
Figure 3. Antiprotozoal activity of Rutamarin 1 against Entamoeba histolytica. 90.03% Growth inhibition at 150 µg/mL, IC50 = 6.52 µg/mL (18.29 µM).
Molecules 26 03684 g003
Molecules 26 03684 g004 550
Figure 4. Antiprotozoal activity of Chalepin 2 against Entamoeba histolytica 94.50% Growth inhibition at 150 µg/mL, IC50 = 28.95 µg/mL (92.08 µM).
Figure 4. Antiprotozoal activity of Chalepin 2 against Entamoeba histolytica 94.50% Growth inhibition at 150 µg/mL, IC50 = 28.95 µg/mL (92.08 µM).
Molecules 26 03684 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bazaldúa-Rodríguez, A.F.; Quintanilla-Licea, R.; Verde-Star, M.J.; Hernández-García, M.E.; Vargas-Villarreal, J.; Garza-González, J.N. Furanocoumarins from Ruta chalepensis with Amebicide Activity. Molecules 2021, 26, 3684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123684

AMA Style

Bazaldúa-Rodríguez AF, Quintanilla-Licea R, Verde-Star MJ, Hernández-García ME, Vargas-Villarreal J, Garza-González JN. Furanocoumarins from Ruta chalepensis with Amebicide Activity. Molecules. 2021; 26(12):3684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123684

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bazaldúa-Rodríguez, Aldo Fabio, Ramiro Quintanilla-Licea, María Julia Verde-Star, Magda Elizabeth Hernández-García, Javier Vargas-Villarreal, and Jesús Norberto Garza-González. 2021. "Furanocoumarins from Ruta chalepensis with Amebicide Activity" Molecules 26, no. 12: 3684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123684

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop