Next Article in Journal
How Computational Chemistry and Drug Delivery Techniques Can Support the Development of New Anticancer Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin Component in the Fruits of Acanthopanax Sessiliflorus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Seem. by Means of High Speed Counter Current Chromatography and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer—From Basic Research to Clinical Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ionic Liquid-Based Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction Coupled with HPLC and Artificial Neural Network Analysis for Ganoderma lucidum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules25071749
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenolic Composition of the Leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. and Their Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity

by
Katarzyna Szewczyk
1,*,
Anna Bogucka-Kocka
2,
Natalia Vorobets
3,
Anna Grzywa-Celińska
4 and
Sebastian Granica
5
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodźki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodźki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, 69 Pekarska Str., 79010 Lviv, Ukraine
4
Chair and Departament of Pneumonology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
5
Department of Pharmacognosy and Molecular Basis of Phytotherapy, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(7), 1749; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071749
Submission received: 18 March 2020 / Revised: 8 April 2020 / Accepted: 8 April 2020 / Published: 10 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromatographic Science of Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. were extracted in the mixed solvent of methanol/acetone/water (2:2:1, v/v/v) and investigated for their phytochemical analysis and biological activity. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were determined spectrophotometrically. A high content of phenols (208.35 mg GAE/g of dry extract), flavonoids (38.90 mg QE/g of dry extract) and gallotannins (722.91 GAE/g of dry extract) was obtained. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–DAD–MS) allowed for the detection of 23 major peaks at 254 nm. The extract was analyzed for its antioxidant capacity using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH•) and 2,2′-azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline]-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS•+) radical scavenging, metal chelating power and β-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching assays. The examined extract showed moderate radical scavenging and chelating activity, and good inhibiting ability of linoleic acid oxidation (EC50 = 0.05 mg/mL) in comparison to standards. The cytotoxic effect in increasing concentration on five types of leukemic cell lines was also investigated using trypan blue vital staining. It was found that the analyzed extract induced the apoptosis of all the tested cell lines. Our findings suggest that the leaves of P. rotundifolia are a source of valuable compounds providing protection against oxidative damage, hence their use in traditional medicine is justified.

1. Introduction

The oxidative–antioxidant balance affects the proper functioning of homeostasis. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) causes oxidative stress and is one of the most common reasons for homeostasis disorders. Oxidative stress, however, contributes mainly to civilization diseases, including neurological disorders [1], cancers [2], hypertension [3], atherosclerosis [4], diabetes [5], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [6], and many others [7]. One of the ways of combating the undesirable effects of ROS is supplementation of exogenous antioxidants. A promising source of antioxidants are plants that have the innate ability to biosynthesize non-enzymatic antioxidants, which, in turn, have the ability to attenuate oxidative damage induced by reactive oxygen species [8].
The genus Pyrola L. (Ericaceae), comprising about 40 species [9], is mainly spread in the Circumboreal floristic region of the Holarctic. The species occur throughout Europe, western and central Asia, China and North America. In Europe, their range extends from the parallel of 68° N passing through northern Scandinavia, reaching as far as northern Spain and Italy, through Bulgaria, Crimea and the Caucasus, where the southernmost positions of the continent are located [10,11,12]. Many Pyrola L. species are used in traditional Eastern medicine due to their high nutritional value and valuable biological activities [13,14]. The aerial parts of P. calliantha, P. decorata, P. incarnata, P. japonica, P. rotundifolia and other species have been used to treat pulmonary hemorrhage, gastric hemorrhage, rheumatic arthritic diseases, kidney deficiency and urogenital diseases in traditional Chinese medicine [15,16,17,18,19,20]. P. decorata, as a tonifying agent, is a valuable element in many Chinese prescriptions for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases [21]. Moreover, Pyrola plants have confirmed pharmacological activities such as antibacterial [22,23], analgesic [18], anti-inflammatory [18,24], inhibitory effects of platelet aggregation [17], as well as vasodilating effects [25]. These properties are the result of many groups of active compounds in Pyrola L. The main groups of secondary metabolites that were found in the genus are flavonoids (quercetin, luteolin, rhamnetin and taxifolin and their glycosides) [12,13,17,24,26,27,28,29], phenols and their derivatives (arbutin, homoarbutin) [15,18,22,30], quinones (chimaphilin, 7′-hydroxychimaphilin, renifolin) [17,31,32], and triterpenoids (ursolic acid, oleanolic acid) [18,21,25,28,33].
Pyrola rotundifolia L., which is the subject of our research, is a perennial herbaceous plant [34] commonly known as round-leaved wintergreen [15]. Although the whole dried plant has been used for years in traditional medicine for the treatment of hypertension, rheumatic pain, tuberculosis, cancer and various inflammatory diseases [35], and is listed in Chinese Pharmacopoeia [36], the reports regarding the pharmacological activities of P. rotundifolia are limited [17,18,19,24,34,35,36].
Due to the importance of Pyrola species in traditional medicine and insufficient current knowledge about the antioxidant and cytotoxic activities among these plants, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological properties of the leaves of P. rotundifolia and conduct their qualitative analysis using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-MS). Moreover, total content of polyphenols, flavonoids and gallotannins was determined. Radical scavenging of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH•) and 2,2′-azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline]-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS•+), metal chelating power and β-carotene-linoleic acid bleaching assays were used to investigate antioxidant activity. The cytotoxicity of the 50% ethanol extract was estimated using trypan blue vital staining against five types of leukemic cell lines.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Phytochemical Analysis

In order to examine the potentially active compounds in P. rotundifolia with antioxidant potential, the total content of phenolic compounds, flavonoids and gallotannins was determined spectrophotometrically.
Phenolic compounds are one of the main classes of secondary metabolites that are responsible for many pharmacological activities. Their consumption can cause a decrease in the risk of diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disfunction. Many researchers concluded that the supposed beneficial impact of polyphenols is often related to their antioxidant activity [37]. The phenolic content (TPC) was examined using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and the results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of dry extract (DE) (Table 1). The TPC of leaves of P. rotundifolia was 208.4 ± 1.2 mg GAE/g DE. This value is comparable to those obtained by Zhang and co-authors [12] for P. incarnata from the Tahe region in northeast China (181.5 ± 3.7 mg GAE/g DW). The TPC values for samples of P. incarnata from other regions in northeast China ranged from 39.7 to 175.1 mg GAE/g DW.
Flavonoids, which constitute one of the largest groups of phenolic compounds, play various roles in the plants and in the human diet [38]. Many reports have suggested that they demonstrate biological properties, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, hepatoprotective and antidiabetic [37,38]. However, the best described characteristic until now is their antioxidant potential [38]. The total flavonoid content of the leaves of P. rotundifolia was evaluated according to the previously described colorimetric method [39] and was expressed in quercetin equivalents (QE) per g of DE (Table 1). The observed flavonoid content was 38.9 ± 0.6 mg QE/g DE. The data for P. rotundifolia was higher than those obtained for P. incarnata from different regions of northeast China where the flavonoid contents varied from 2.5 to 22.1 mg of rutin equivalent per g of dry weight [12]. Total flavonoid content was also measured for P. decorata, P. calliantha and P. renifolia from different regions in China. Our results are most similar to those obtained for extracts from P. decorata collected in the Emei Mountains, Sichuan province (37.8 mg of rutin equivalent per g of dry weight) [13].
Tannins are one of the most widespread natural substances in nature. They are known as lipid peroxidation and lipooxygenases inhibitors, as well as a radical scavengers. Hydrolysable tannins, next to proanthocyanidins, are the major group of these compounds [40]. The total hydrolysable tannin content was measured using a very specific assay with rhodamine. It was found that P. rotundifolia leaves contain a high concentration of gallotannins with 722.9 μg GAE per gram of dry extract.
The next objective of our research was to perform qualitative analysis of the active compounds in the extract of the leaves of P. rotundifolia. The UHPLC–DAD–MS analysis of extracts allowed for the detection of 23 major peaks at 254 nm (Figure 1, Table 2). Compounds 2, 3, 5, 6–8 and 14 displayed a single UV maximum at 274–278 nm, characteristic of a gallic acid moiety present in the structure. Compounds 2 and 3 showed a pseudomolecular ion in the MS spectrum at m/z = 331. The fragmentation of the base peak at m/z 331 showed signals of a gallic acid moiety at m/z = 169, and the neutral loss during the fragmentation was −162 amu, corresponding to a hexose unit. Thus, compounds 2 and 3 were characterized as galloylglucose isomers. Compound 5 showed a base peak signal in the MS spectrum at m/z = 483. The fragmentation of the major ion in the spectrum (483 amu) resulted in the production of a galloylglucose moiety at m/z = 331. Further fragmentation in the MS3 spectrum revealed the pattern-like compounds 2 and 3. These observations led to the conclusion that 5 is a digalloylglucose isomer. Compounds 6 and 7 had a base peak ion in the MS spectrum at m/z = 437 and 325, respectively. Compound 6 was assigned as 6-O-galloylhomoarbutin based on previous reports on the phytochemical composition of Pyrola incarnata [30]. Compound 7 was identified as a galloylshikimic acid isomer based on characteristic fragmentation patterns as described by Abu-Reidah et al. [41]. Compound 1 had a pseudomolecular ion at m/z = 389 and UV–vis maximum at approximately 235 nm. It was assigned as monotropein, a compound that was previously described in several Pyrola species [26,42]. Compound 11, with a major peak in the MS spectrum at m/z = 441 and fragmentation pattern showing peaks at m/z = 289 and 169, was identified as epicatechin gallate according to previous reports [30]. Compounds 10, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 22 had UV–vis spectra typical of flavonoids with maxima at approximately 260 and 350 nm. All of their fragmentation patterns revealed the presence of a strong signal at m/z = 301, suggesting that they contain quercetin as an aglycone. Based on comparisons made with available chemical standards [43], and according to the literature on the phytochemical composition of Pyrola species, compounds 10, 12, 13 and 16 were identified as quercetin 2′-O-galloylgalactoside, hyperoside, isoquercitrin and guajaverin, respectively [30]. Compound 15 was characterized as another quercetin, O-galloylhexoside, and compound 22 with a pseudomolecular ion at m/z = 585 was tentatively identified as quercetin O-galloylpentoside. The identity or partial identity of compounds 4, 9, 17–21 and 23 could not be resolved due to the unavailability of sufficient data. They were characterized by providing observed retention times, UV-vis maxima and MS data [11,28,30,41]. Although chimaphilin has been identified in several Pyrola species, including whole herb of P. rotundifolia [18], our study did not confirm the presence of this compound in the leaves of P. rotundifolia. This difference may be caused by a different habitat of plants or/and various methods of preparing extracts.
The quantitative evaluation of the molecules detected in the extract of the leaves of P. rotundifolia was performed based on the calibration curves of several compounds: epicatechin for the quantification of catechins, isoquercitrin for flavonoid derivatives, and gallic acid for galloyl derivatives. For unidentified compounds, we chose quercetin, because electrospray ionization (ESI) was similar to that of this standard. The areas of quantified compounds were determined at 275, 280 and 350 nm. The studied extract contained mostly quercetin (37.31 μg/mg DE) and gallic acid derivatives (18.65 μg/mg DE). Quercetin O-galloylhexoside (24.90 ± 1.17 µg/mg of DE) and galloylglucose isomer I (13.07 ± 0.11 µg/mg of DE) were the most abundant compounds. Similarly, Yao and co-authors [44] found mainly quercetin derivatives in P. incarnata extracts, although with a noticeably lower concentration in comparison to our investigation.

2.2. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

Great attention has been recently given to natural compounds with established antioxidant effects and less toxicity in normal cells, because they appear promising for cancer prevention and treatment [45]. Plants and individual compounds isolated from them are one of the basic sources of potential chemopreventative and chemotherapeutic components. Because species belonging to the Pyrola L. are used in traditional medicine [13,14], in the next step of our study, the effect of the extract of P. rotundifolia leaves listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [36] was investigated. The increasing concentrations of the ethanolic extract on human acute promyelocytic leukemia cell lines HL-60, HL-60/MX1 and HL-60/MX2, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines CEM/C1 and CCRF/CEM cancer cell lines were studied. The cytotoxicity was estimated using trypan blue vital staining. In the case of all leukemic cell lines exposed to the extract from the leaves of P. rotundifolia, a significant dose-dependent cytotoxic potential was observed (Figure 2).
The results for the cytotoxic effect, given in Table 3, showed that the tested extract significantly inhibited HL-60/MX1 and CCRF/CEM human leukemia cells with IC50 values of 3.3 and 6.2 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the extract from the leaves showed a moderate cytotoxicity against three other lines—HL-60 with an IC50 = 12.3 ± 2.1 μg/mL, CEM/C1 with an IC50 = 16.9 ± 1.9 μg/mL and against HL-60/MX2 with an IC50 = 17.8 ± 2.4 μg/mL. The viability of the CCRF/CEM cell line after incubation with 1 μg/mL ethanolic extract of P. rotundifolia leaves were greatly affected (99% of nonviable cells) compared to untreated cells. Similar results were obtained at 300 μg/mL extract concentration for HL-60/MX1 (98.7% of nonviable cells). Control assays were performed using only the relevant volumes of medium and were considered as 100% of cell viability. Regardless of the examined extract concentration and type of cell line, the viability of the extract-treated cells differed significantly from that of the untreated cells (control) and was observed at 94.3 ± 0.04 to 1.0 ± 0.2% of the control viability.
Published papers on the cytotoxic activity of Pyrola species are limited. The cytotoxic effect of various extracts from the roots of P. japonica and the major isolated compound, chimaphilin, were tested against murine L1210 and human chronic myelogenous K562 leukemia cell lines [46]. Chimaphilin isolated from P. incarnata demonstrated inhibition of the viability of tested human breast cancer MCF-7 cells (IC50 = 43.30 μM) and caused mitochondrial dysfunction and caspase-dependent apoptosis [47].
Our study attempted to indicate a correlation between phenolic compound content and cytotoxicity against various leukemic cell lines. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the mutual relationships (Table 4). A very strong positive correlation was found for total gallotannin content and HL-60, HL-60/MX1, HL-60/MX2 and CCRF/CEM cell lines (r = 0.9972, 0.9999, 0.9994 and 0.9999, respectively). A good negative correlation was observed for TPC and the above leukemic cell lines (r = −0.8053, −0.8386, −0.8278 and −0.8401, respectively). Our findings suggest that gallotannins may be responsible for the exertion the cytotoxicity activity.
Moreover, the presence of a large amount of quercetin derivatives may be responsible for the cytotoxic activity of P. rotundifolia leaves. It has been reported that these compounds may be considered as potential anticancer agents that have the ability to inhibit and prevent carcinogen-induced tumors [48].

2.3. Antioxidant Activity

It is known that reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide (O2•-), alkoxyl (RO•), peroxyl (ROO•), nitric oxide (NO•) and hydroxyl (HO•), apart from having some positive effects on the regulation of cell growth or synthesis of biologically important components, can also cause significant damage to cells. They can induce oxidation, which causes various degenerative diseases [37,38]. Although many synthetic antioxidants are currently available, it is important to search for new, natural compounds that could prevent oxidative stress. Antioxidation could be, among others, an effect of scavenging of free radicals, metal chelation and enzyme inhibition. Flavonoids, especially quercetin derivatives, which are most abundant in the leaves of P. rotundifolia, are powerful antioxidants with anti-inflammatory and anti-cancerogenic effects [49].
The measurement of antioxidant activity in our study was performed using four colorimetric protocols on a microplate scale in cell-free systems. The obtained results are presented in Table 5.
The examined extract exhibited moderate ability to scavenge the DPPH• free radical in a concentration-dependent manner. For comparison, the radical scavenging activity of ascorbic acid was measured under the same conditions. The EC50 value for the extract of the leaves (0.2 ± 0.01 mg/mL) was almost three times higher than the one for ascorbic acid. Our result can be compared to the radical scavenging activity of P. decorata, P. calliantha and P. renifolia from various regions in China analyzed by Wang et al. [13]. Among these species, the highest ability was reported for P. calliantha (IC50 = 9.66 μg/mL), followed by P. renifolia (IC50 = 24.80 μg/mL) and P. decorata (IC50 = 37.11 μg/mL). Moreover, the extract from the aerial parts of P. incarnata possesses high antioxidant activity with an IC50 = 0.121 mg/mL [44]. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of P. incarnata from the different regions of China was also investigated by Zhang et al. [12]. They found that samples from eight sites from northeast China have moderate ability to scavenge DPPH• (IC50 value from 0.106 to 0.282 mg/mL).
Smirnova and co-authors [50] examined the radical scavenging capacity of P. rotundifolia. Although the authors obtained a scavenging effect of 71% for the ethanolic extract, the value is difficult to compare because we do not know what part of the plant was used or what the concentration of the examined extract was.
The percentage of ABTS•+ radical reduction caused by the extract of P. rotundifolia was measured after 10 min of incubation at λ = 734 nm. In this assay, the reported value from the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) protocol was 0.6 ± 0.03 mmol Trolox/g of dry extract, which is comparable to results obtained for P. incarnata from different regions in China (0.25–0.64 mmol Trolox/g) [12] and for P. decorata (696.78 ± 67.94 μmol Trolox/g) [13]. The extracts of P. calliantha and P. renifolia showed a weaker capacity to neutralize the ABTS•+ radical cation (984.64 and 818.96 μmol Trolox/g, respectively) [13].
In our study, we also showed that the extract of P. rotundifolia had a moderate ferrous ion chelating effect, and were thereby able to capture ferrous ions before ferrozine formation. As in case of the DPPH• assay, the chelating activity of the extract was three times weaker than the activity of the standard used (EDTA, EC50 = 0.5 ± 0.1 mg/mL).
In the β-carotene bleaching protocol, the degree of linoleic acid oxidation is established by evaluating its oxidation products that attack β-carotene (bleaching of yellow color) [51]. The extract of P. rotundifolia leaves showed the inhibiting ability of linoleic acid oxidation (EC50 = 0.1 ± 0.03 mg/mL), comparable to butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) which was used as positive standard (EC50 = 0.02 ± 0.01 mg/mL). Zhang and co-authors found that extracts of P. incarnata from different regions of China also inhibited the oxidation of linoleic acid with increasing concentrations (IC50 from 0.032 to 0.097 mg/mL) [12].
Many studies on the relationship between antioxidant capacity and total polyphenol content have been conducted. Some scientists found a strong correlation between these parameters [52], while others have not shown such correlation [53]. In our study, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the correlation between the antioxidant capacity and the TPC, TFC and GTC content levels (Table 6). A very strong positive correlation was found between the IC50 values of DPPH• and ABTS•+ radicals with total polyphenol content (r = 0.93 and 0.89, respectively), and also between DPPH• radical and total flavonoid content (r = 0.98). In addition, GTC strongly negatively correlated with the ABTS•+ radical (r = −0.99). A good positive correlation was also observed between the IC50 values of β-carotene bleaching and total flavonoid content (r = 0.79). The obtained results showed that good antioxidant activity of the extract of P. rotundifolia leaves is not related only to total polyphenol content, but also to other compounds such as gallotannins and flavonoids.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. were collected in the territory adjacent to the Yavoriv National Park (49°59′53.2″ N; 23°40′43.8″ E) (Ukraine). The identity of the species was confirmed by Natalia Vorobets. A voucher specimen was deposited in the Department of Pharmaceutical Botany (PR-150716).
The plant material was dried in air, shade and at an average temperature of 24.0 ± 0.5 °C for 6 days [54]. The loss of weight after drying was 6.53% ± 0.19 [54]. Fifty grams of dried, powdered and sieved through a 0.28-mm sieve leaves were extracted successively five times with methanol/acetone/water (2:2:1, v/v/v) (1 h each, solid-to-solvent ratio = 1:4) using an ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Sonorex Digitec DT 100H, Berlin, Germany). The extract was filtered, evaporated under reduced pressure, and then lyophilized using a freeze dryer apparatus (Free Zone 1 apparatus; Labconco, Kansas City, KS, USA) and 7.35 g of dried extract was obtained. For UHPLC analysis and antioxidant assays, 100 mg of obtained extract was dissolved in 10 mL 80% methanol and filtered through a 0.45 μm Chromafil syringe polyester membrane (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). For cytotoxic activity analysis, 100 mg of crude extract was dissolved in 10 mL 50% ethanol and filtered to give the stock solution (10 mg/mL).

3.2. Chemicals and Reagents

Water and formic acid for LC analysis were purchased from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Holland). HPLC grade acetonitrile, ascorbic acid, 2,2′-azino-bis-(3-ethyl-benzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS•+), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), ferrozine (3-(2-pyridyl)-5,6-bis(4-phenyl-sulfonic acid)-1,2,4-triazine), linoleic acid, rhodamine, Tween 40, and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Gallic acid and quercetin were obtained from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and all other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Avantor-POCh (Gliwice, Poland).

3.3. Total Phenolic, Flavonoid, and Gallotannin Content

The total phenolic (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) were determined using the colorimetric methods previously described [39]. TPC was examined as follows: 20 μL of the extract was added to 20 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (diluted with water 1:4 v/v). Then, 160 μL of sodium carbonate (75 g/L) was added, and the absorbance was measured after 20 min incubation at 750 nm using an ELISA Reader Infinite Pro 200F (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland). The TPC was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per g of dry extract (mg GAE/g DE) using a calibration curve for gallic acid (0.001–0.008 mg/mL; R2 = 0.9908). For TFC determination, 20 μL of the extract was mixed with 60 μL of 96% ethanol, 4 μL of 1 M sodium acetate, 4 μL of 10% aqueous solution of aluminum chloride and filled with water to 200 μL. The absorbance was measured after 30 min incubation at 430 nm. The total flavonoid content was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalent per g of dry extract (mg QE/g DE) using a calibration curve for quercetin (0.05–0.20 mg/mL; R2 = 0.9999). Gallotannin content (GTC) was assayed on microplates according to the method described by Inoue and Hagerman [55] with some modifications. Five microliters of the examined extract was mixed with 6 μL of 0.4 N sulphuric acid followed by 24 μL of rhodamine. After 10 min, 8 μL of 0.5 N KOH was added, and after a following 3 min, 160 μL of water was added. The absorbance was measured after a 15 min incubation at 520 nm. The GTC was expressed as μg of gallic acid equivalent per g of dry extract (μg GAE/g DE) using a calibration curve for gallic acid (2–20 μg/mL; R2 = 0.9906).

3.4. UHPLC–DAD–MS Analysis

The UHPLC analysis was performed using an Ultimate 3000 series system (Dionex, Idstein, Germany) equipped with a dual low-pressure gradient pump with vacuum degasser, an autosampler, a column compartment, and a diode array detector coupled with Amazon SL ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). The separation of compounds in the analyzed extract was carried out with a Kinetex XB-C18 analytical column (100 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.9 µm), Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). Column temperature was maintained at 25 °C. Elution was conducted using mobile phase A (0.1% HCOOH in deionized water) and mobile phase B (0.1% HCOOH in acetonitrile) with a multi-step gradient as follows: 0 min 5% B, 60 min 26% B, 70 min 50% B and finally 75 min 95% B. The flow rate was set to 0.3 mL/min during extract and standard analysis. Five microliters of each sample was introduced to the column by the autosampler. The column was equilibrated for 10 min between injections. UV–vis spectra were recorded in the range of 200–450 nm. Chromatograms were acquired at 254 nm. The eluate was introduced into the mass spectrometer without splitting. The ion trap Amazon SL mass spectrometer was equipped with an ESI interface. The parameters for the ESI source were set as follows: nebulizer pressure 40 psi; dry gas flow 9 L/min; dry temperature 300 °C; and capillary voltage 4.5 kV. Analysis was carried out using scan from m/z 70–2200. Compounds were analyzed in negative and positive ion mode. The MS2 and MS3 fragmentations were performed using Smart Frag mode. Compounds were tentatively identified based on the determination of their molecular mass, UV-vis spectra and fragmentation profiles in respect to the literature data on what compounds were previously detected or isolated from different Pyrola species. The search for potential matches was done using the Reaxys database.

Quantification of Major Flavonoids by UHPLC–DAD

The quantification of the compounds was performed using the analytical method reported in Section 3.4 and based on the calibration curves of several compounds: epicatechin for the quantification of catechins, isoquercitrin for flavonoid glucosides, gallic acid for galloyl derivatives, and quercetin for unidentified compounds. The areas of quantified compounds were determined at 275, 280 and 350 nm. For the quantification, accurately weighed 10 mg of DE was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol/water mixture (1:1, v/v). The solution was filtered through a 0.45 µm Polyvinyl Difluoride (PVDF) syringe filter and injected into the UHPLC (3 µL). Samples were analyzed in triplicate. Stock solutions of the standards were prepared by dissolving 1 mg of the compounds in 1 mL of methanol. The stock solutions were diluted in mobile phase to obtain solution at the concentration of 50 µg/mL. Different amounts of the standard were injected into the UHPLC column. The calibration curves were plotted based on the amount of injected compounds vs. peak area at 280 and 350 nm. The linear range was 50–400 ng/injection (R2 ≥ 0.99).

3.5. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human acute promyelocytic leukemia cell lines HL-60 (CCL-240™), HL-60/MX1 (CRL-2258™), and HL-60/MX2 (CRL-2257™), acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines CEM/C1 (CRL-2265™) and CCRF/CEM (CCL-119™) were used in the study. Cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®) 10801, University Boulevard Manassas, VA 20110, USA. Details regarding the cell lines used in the research have been described in our previous report [56]. The cells were kept in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium (Biomed, Lublin, Poland) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (PAA Laboratories) for HL-60/MX1, HL-60/MX2, CEM/C1, and CCRF/CEM, and 20% FBS for HL-60 cell lines, streptomycin and penicillin (100 U/mL PAA Laboratories), and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B (Gibco, Carlsbad, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

3.6. Analysis of Cell Viability

The cells used in all experiments were placed in 12-well plates (Sarstedt GesmbH, Wiener Neudorf, Austria) at an initial density of 1 × 106 cells/mL. After incubation (24 h; 37 °C), the cell suspensions were incubated with extract of the leaves of P. rotundifolia at concentrations ranging from 1 to 1000 μg/mL. Next, 1 mL of cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 6 min and centrifuged cells were resuspended in 50 μL of PBS. Afterwards, 10 μL of cell suspension was mixed with 10 μL of 0.4% solution of trypan blue reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The samples were incubated for 5 min. The cell viability was measured using a TC 10™ Automated Cell Counter (Bio-Rad). The experiment was done in triplicate. The IC50 (inhibitor concentration when cell viability is 50%) values were determined using MS Excel.

3.7. Antioxidant Activity Assays

All assays were made using 96-well microplates (Nunclon, Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and were measured in an ELISA Reader Infinite Pro 200F (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland).
The DPPH• (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl) radical scavenging activity was measured by a previously described method [57]. DPPH solution (180 μL of freshly prepared 0.07 mg/mL solution) was mixed with 20 μL of the examined extract in various concentrations in microplates. The absorbance at 517 nm was monitored after 30 min incubation at 28 °C and the results were expressed as an EC50 value. Ascorbic acid was used as the control. The antiradical potential was also analyzed using the previously described ABTS•+ (2,2′-azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline]-6-sulfonic acid) assay [57]. The absorbance was measured at 734 nm and the results were expressed as millimoles of Trolox equivalents per g of dry extract (TEAC).
The metal chelating activity was determined by the method described by Guo et al. [58] with some modifications. In this assay, 0.2 mM aqueous solution of ferric chloride and 0.5 mM aqueous solution of ferrozine were used. Twenty microliters of the 0.2 mM aqueous solution of ferric chloride (II) was mixed with 100 μL of extract at different concentrations. Next, 40 μL of 0.5 mM aqueous solution of ferrozine was added and microplates were shaken and incubated for 10 min in 24 °C. The absorbance was measured at 562 nm and the percentage of inhibition of ferrozine–Fe2+ complex formation was calculated using the following formula:
% inhibition = (1 − (As/Ac)) × 100
where Ac is the absorbance of the control (water instead of the extract), and As is the absorbance of the extract.
The results were presented as the concentration of the extract that causes metal chelating in 50% (EC50) calculated on the basis of the linear correlation between the inhibition of ferrozine–Fe2+ complex formation and the concentrations of the extract. EDTA was used as a positive control.
Antioxidant activity was also assayed using the β-carotene bleaching method described and modified by Deba and co-authors [51]. Twenty microliters of extract at different concentrations were mixed with freshly prepared β-carotene-linoleic acid emulsion, and incubated for 20 min at 40 °C. The absorbance was measured at 470 nm. BHT was used as a positive control.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used for the statistical analysis of significance of differences between means. p values below 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. The correlations were evaluated by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients. All the investigations were done using Statistica 10.0 (StatSoft Poland, Cracow, Poland).

4. Conclusions

More and more research in medicine is being devoted to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Currently, there is significant evidence that ROS induce oxidative damage in biomolecules, which is responsible for the formation of many diseases such as cancer [59]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that medicinal plants possess antioxidant potential from the redox features of phenolic compounds. Besides being good antioxidants, plants and their active constituents are good antitumor agents with cytotoxic activity against numerous cell lines [59].
In our study, we found that the leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia contain large amounts of biologically active compounds. Twenty-three compounds were detected in the UHPLC–DAD–MS analysis. Among them, isoquercitrin, guajaverin, monotropein, galloylglucose isomers, quercetin 2′′-O-galloylgalactoside and epicatechin gallate were described for the first time in the examined species.
From the obtained cytotoxic effect values of the ethanolic extract of P. rotundifolia against five leukemic cell lines, it can be concluded that the viability of cells considerably decreased with increasing doses of the examined extract. Many authors found that aqueous and ethanolic extracts have a major destructive effect on tumor cells as compared with nonpolar extracts [60]. It is known that phenolic compounds such as tannins and flavonoids are soluble in ethanol; therefore, they can be the major group of active components for the destruction of leukemic cells. Moreover, the examined extract had good antioxidant activity and can be considered as a radical inhibitor or scavenger. Although further details regarding the effect of P. rotundifolia leaves and their individual compounds against the leukemic cells examined in our study remain to be investigated, the present results suggest that the ethanolic extract would be beneficial in the chemoprevention of leukemia. Furthermore, as a rich source of phenolic compounds with good antioxidant properties, it can be used as a reliable source of natural antioxidants and may be used for food supplement production and in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry.

Author Contributions

K.S., A.B.-K. and N.V. designed the research plan; K.S., A.B.-K., A.G.-C. and S.G. carried out the experiments and analyzed data; K.S., A.B.-K. and S.G. interpreted results; K.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sayre, L.M.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G. Chemistry and biochemistry of oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Valko, M.; Rhodes, C.J.; Moncol, J.; Izakovic, M.; Mazur, M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 160, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dhalla, N.S.; Temsah, R.M.; Netticadan, T. Role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases. J. Hypertens. 2000, 18, 655–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, U.; Jialal, I. Oxidative stress and atherosclerosis. Pathophysiology 2006, 13, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Van Eeden, S.F.; Sin, D.D. Oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A lung and systemic process. Can. Respir. J. 2013, 20, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kasote, D.M.; Katyare, S.S.; Hegde, M.V.; Bae, H. Significance of antioxidant potential of plants and its relevance to therapeutic applications. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=pyrola (accessed on 7 February 2020).
  10. Tutin, T.G. Flora Europaea. Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972; Volume 3, p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yao, X.H.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zu, Y.G.; Fu, Y.; Luo, M.; Gu, C.B.; Li, C.Y.; Efferth, T. Free radical scavenging capability, antioxidant activity and chemical constituents of Pyrola incarnata Fisch. leaves. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 49, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, D.Y.; Luo, M.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C.J.; Gu, C.B.; Zu, Y.G.; Fu, Y.J.; Yao, X.H.; Duan, M.H. Variation of active constituents and antioxidant activity in pyrola [P. incarnata Fisch.] from different sites in Northeast China. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, D.; He, F.; Lv, Z.; Li, D. Phytochemical composition, antioxidant activity and HPLC fingerprinting profiles of three Pyrola species from different regions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, M.; Xiao, G.G.; Rong, P.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, J.; Zhao, H.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Pan, J.; Liu, H.; et al. Therapeutic effects of radix dipsaci, pyrola herb, and cynomorium songaricum on bone metabolism of ovariectomized rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Darzuli, N.P.; Vronska, L.V.; Groshovyi, T.A.; Beley, N.M. Development of methods of standarization of medicinal plants—Pyrola rotundifolia leaf. Pharm. Innov. J. 2017, 6, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ho, Y.S.; So, K.F.; Chang, R.C. Anti-aging herbal medicine—How and why can they be used in aging-associated neurodegenerative diseases? Ageing Res Rev. 2009, 9, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kagawa, K.; Tokura, K.; Uchida, K.; Kakushi, H.; Shike, T.; Nakai, H. Platelet aggregation inhibitors and inotropic constituents in Pyrolae herba. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 2083–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kosuge, T.; Yokota, M.; Sugiyama, K.; Mure, T.; Yamazawa, H.; Yamamoto, T. Studies on bioactive substances in crude drugs used for arthritic diseases in Traditional Chinese Medicine. III. Isolation and identification of anti-inflammatory and analgesic principles from the whole herb of Pyrola rotundifolia L. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 5355–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Perry, L.M. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, D.Y.; Yao, X.H.; Duan, M.H.; Luo, M.; Wang, W.; Fu, Y.J.; Zu, Y.G.; Efferth, T. An effective negative pressure cavitation-microwave assisted extraction for determination of phenolic compounds in P. calliantha H. Andr. Analyst 2013, 138, 4631–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, X.; Peng, Q.; Liu, Q.; Hu, J.; Tang, Z.; Cui, L.; Lin, Z.; Xu, B.; Lu, K.; Yang, F.; et al. Antioxidant activity against H2O2-induced cytotoxicity of the ethanol extract and compounds from Pyrola decorate leaves. Pharm. Biol. 2017, 55, 1843–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, J.; Inui, T. Novel phenolic glycoside dimer and trimer from the whole herb of Pyrola rotundifolia. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 1051–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Park, H.G.; Cha, M.R.; Hwang, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, M.S.; Choi, S.U.; Park, H.R.; Hwang, Y.I. Antimicrobial activity of the extract from Pyrola japonica against Bacillus subtilis. Int. J. Life Sci. 2006, 16, 989–993. [Google Scholar]
  24. Odontuya, G.; Hoult, J.R.S.; Houghton, P.J. Structure-activity relationship for antiinflammatory effect of luteolin and its derived glycosides. Phytother. Res. 2005, 19, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, C.; Ren, R.; Liu, R. Simultaneous determination of seven major triterpenoids in Pyrola decorate H. Andres by LC-MS method. Die Pharm. 2012, 67, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Bergeron, C.; Marston, A.; Antus, S.; Gauthier, R.; Hostettmann, K. Flavonoids from Pyrola elliptica. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, J.S.; Shim, S.H.; Xu, Y.N.; Kang, S.S.; Son, K.H.; Chang, H.W.; Kim, H.P.; Bae, K. Phenolic glycosides from Pyrola japonica. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 714–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, L.; Li, A.L.; Zhao, M.B.; Tu, P.F. Tetralones and flavonoids from Pyrola calliantha. Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 2932–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhou, D.; Jin, Y.; Yao, F.; Duan, Z.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J. Validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of hyperoside and 2″-O-galloylhyperin in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yazaki, K.; Shida, S.; Okuda, T. Galloylhomoarbutin and related polyphenols from Pyrola incarnate. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, S.M.; An, R.B.; Min, B.S.; Na, M.K.; Lee, C.H.; Kang, S.J.; Maeng, H.Y.; Bae, K.H. A new naphtoquinone from Pyrola japonica. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2001, 24, 522–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ptitsyn, L.R.; Nomura, K.; Sklyar, I.V.; Ravcheeva, A.B. The 1,4-naphthoquinone derivative from Pyrola rotundifolia activates AMPK phosphorylation in C2C12 myotubes. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 1285–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.L.; Tan, C.H.; Tan, J.J.; Qu, S.J.; Wang, H.B.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, S.H.; Zhu, D.Y. Phenolic and triterpenoid glycosides from Pyrola calliantha. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 2421–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kirillov, V.; Stikhareva, T.; Atazhanova, G.; Serafimovich, M.; Mukanov, B.; Adekenov, S.; Mukasheva, F.; Yrymgali, M. Chemical composition of the essential oil of the boreal relict of Pyrola rotundifolia L. from northern Kazakhstan. J. Oleo Sci. 2015, 64, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cai, L.; Ye, H.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Yu, F.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Liu, X. Chemical constituents of volatile oil from Pyrolae herba and antiproliferative activity against SW1353 human chondrosarcoma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 1452–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 1st ed.; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2005; pp. 226–277. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tresserra-Rimbau, A.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M.; Moreno, J.J. Polyphenols, food and pharma. Current knowledge and directions for future research. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 156, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pietta, P.G. Flavonoids as antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Vorobets, N.; Chrząszcz, M.; Pietrzak, W.; Szewczyk, K. Polyphenol composition of extracts of the fruits of Laserpitium krapffii Crantz and their antioxidant and cytotoxic activity. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Serrano, J.; Puupponen-Pimiaä, R.; Dauer, A.; Aura, A.M.; Saura-Calixto, F. Tannins: Current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S310–S329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Abu-Reidah, I.M.; Ali-Shtayeh, M.S.; Jamous, R.M.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A. HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chem. 2015, 166, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Inouye, H.; Arai, T.; Yaoi, Y.; Ogawa, M. Auftreten von hydrochinontyp-glucosiden, chimaphilin und monotropein in den Pyrolazeen. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1964, 12, 255–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Granica, S.; Hinc, K. Flavonoids in aerial parts of Persicaria mitis (Schrank) Holub. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 61, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yao, X.H.; Zhang, D.Y.; Luo, M.; Zu, Y.G.; Efferth, T.; Fu, Y.J. Negative pressure cavitation-microwave assisted preparation of extract of Pyrola incarnata Fisch. rich in hyperin, 2′-O-galloylhyperin and chimaphilin and evaluation of its antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2015, 169, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Feng, R.; Ni, H.M.; Wang, S.Y.; Tourkova, I.L.; Shurin, M.R.; Harada, H.; Yin, X.M. Cyanidin-3-rutinoside, a natural polyphenol antioxidant, selectively kills leukemic cells by introduction of oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 13468–13476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bae, K.; Kim, H.M.; Lee, S. Isolation and evaluation of an antitumor constituent from Pyrolae Herba. Yakhak Hoeji. 1996, 40, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ma, W.D.; Zou, Y.P.; Wang, P.; Yao, X.H.; Sun, Y.; Duan, M.H.; Fu, Y.J.; Yu, B. Chimaphilin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells through a ROS-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 70, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sak, K. Site-specific anticancer effects of dietary flavonoid quercetin. Nutr. Cancer. 2014, 66, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shokoohinia, Y.; Rashidi, M.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Jelodarian, Z. Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, a dietary flavonoid, protects PC12 cell from H2O2-induced cytotoxicity through inhibition of reactive oxygen species. Food Chem. 2015, 167, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Smirnova, G.V.; Vysochina, G.I.; Muzyka, N.G.; Samoylova, Z.Y.; Kukushkina, T.A.; Oktyabrsky, O.N. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of medicinal plants using microbial test systems. World J. Microbial. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 2269–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deba, F.; Xuan, T.D.; Yasuda, M.; Tawata, S. Chemical composition and antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oils from Bidens pilosa Linn. var. radiata. Food Control. 2008, 19, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nowak, R.; Szewczyk, K.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Rzymowska, J.; Komsta, Ł. Antioxidative and cytotoxic potential of some Chenopodium L. species growing in Poland. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gazzani, G.; Papetti, A.; Massolini, G.; Daglia, M. Anti- and prooxidant activity of water soluble components of some common diet vegetables and effect of thermal treatment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4118–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Polish Pharmacopoeia IX. PTFarm; Polish Pharmaceutical Society: Warsaw, Poland, 2011; p. 150. [Google Scholar]
  55. Inoue, K.H.; Hagerman, A.E. Determination of gallotannin with rhodamine. Anal. Biochem. 1988, 169, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kubrak, T.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Komsta, Ł.; Załuski, D.; Bogucki, J.; Gałkowski, D.; Kaczmarczyk, R.; Feldo, M.; Cioch, M.; Kocki, J. Modulation of multidrug resistance gene expression by coumarin derivatives in human leukemic cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 5647281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Olech, M.; Nowacka-Jechalke, N.; Masłyk, M.; Martyna, A.; Pietrzak, W.; Kubiński, K.; Załuski, D.; Nowak, R. Polysaccharide-rich fractions from Rosa rugosa Thunb.—Composition and chemopreventive potential. Molecules 2019, 24, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Guo, J.T.; Lee, H.L.; Chiang, S.H.; Lin, H.I.; Chang, C.Y. Antioxidant properties of the extracts from different parts of broccoli in Taiwan. J. Food Drug Anal. 2001, 9, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  59. Szewczyk, K.; Grzywa-Celińska, A. Antioxidants and cytotoxic activities of phenolic acids and their role in the anticancer therapies. In Phenolic Acids: Properties, Food Sources and Health Effects; Flores, A., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 61–104. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sulaiman, G.M.; Hussien, N.N.; Marzoog, T.R.; Awad, H.A. Phenolic content, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of ethanolic extract of Salix alba. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 9, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 01749 g001 550
Figure 1. The ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector (UHPLC–DAD) chromatogram acquired at 254 nm with marked compounds. Peak numbers relate to those in Table 2.
Figure 1. The ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector (UHPLC–DAD) chromatogram acquired at 254 nm with marked compounds. Peak numbers relate to those in Table 2.
Molecules 25 01749 g001
Molecules 25 01749 g002 550
Figure 2. The valuation of the viability of various cell lines exposed to 24 h of increasing concentrations of an extract from P. rotundifolia leaves.
Figure 2. The valuation of the viability of various cell lines exposed to 24 h of increasing concentrations of an extract from P. rotundifolia leaves.
Molecules 25 01749 g002
Table
Table 1. The total phenolic (TPC), flavonoid (TFC) and gallotannin (GTC) content in the leaves of P. rotundifolia.
Table 1. The total phenolic (TPC), flavonoid (TFC) and gallotannin (GTC) content in the leaves of P. rotundifolia.
Phenolic Content
TPC (mg GAE/g DE)208.4 ± 1.2
TFC (mg QE/g DE)38.9 ± 0.6
GTC (μg GAE/g DE)722.9 ± 0.5
The results are expressed as mg/μg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and quercetin equivalent (QE) per g of dry extract (DE). Values are presented in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), n = 3.
Table
Table 2. The ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-MS3) data for compounds detected in the leaves of P. rotundifolia.
Table 2. The ultra-high performance liquid chromatography diode array detector tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-MS3) data for compounds detected in the leaves of P. rotundifolia.
No.Compound NameRetention Time (min)UV (nm)[M − H]− m/zMS2 IonsMS3 IonsNL Detected (amu)Compound Content (µg/mg of DE)
1Monotropein t2.7237389345, 227b, 209, 191, 179, 165, 147, 135--10.41 ± 0.07
2Galloylglucose isomer I3.5278331314, 271, 211, 193, 169b, 125125b16213.07 ± 0.11
3Galloylglucose isomer II4.5277331271, 207, 169b, 161, 125--0.69 ± 0.05
4Unknown compound6.1282331285b, 241, 161, 123--0.91 ± 0.02
5Digalloylglucose isomer21.7276483423, 331, 313, 271b, 211, 169271b, 241, 1691520.75 ± 0.03
66-O-Galloylhomoarbutin t24.7274437313b, 271, 211, 169--0.87 ± 0.01
7Galloylshikimic acid t26.1277325205, 169b, 119, 101--1.24 ± 0.05
8Gallic acid derivative30.0277725679b, 577, 517, 407, 331--0.61 ± 0.02
9Unknown compound34.0224sh, 239, 302349259, 241, 229, 187b, 161--3.82 ± 0.12
10Quercetin-2′′-O-galloylgalactoside s35.0250, 261sh, 352615463b, 343, 301343, 301b1520.67 ± 0.15
11Epicatechin gallate t36.0280441397, 331, 289b, 271, 169245b, 2051520.13 ± 0.01
12Quercetin 3-O-galactoside (hyperoside) s37.1254, 263sh, 351463343, 301b, 179271, 255, 179b, 1511629.35 ± 0.75
13Quercetin 3-O-glucoside (isoquercitrin) s38.2251, 261sh, 351463343, 301b-1620.72 ± 0.14
14Gallic acid derivative39.2270521506, 359b, 169315, 169b1621.42 ± 0.07
15Quercetin O-galloylhexoside40.0252, 263sh, 352615463, 343, 313, 301b--24.90 ± 1.17
16Quercetin-3-O-arabinopyranoside (guajaverin) s41.9251, 260sh, 352433343, 301b257, 179b, 1511320.89 ± 0.20
17Unknown compound43.2-391259, 241, 229, 187b, 172--0.07 ± 0.01
18Unknown compound43.8-457411b, 379, 337, 301, 217--0.25 ± 0.01
19Unknown compound44.5226, 266599435, 313b, 285--0.61 ± 0.03
20Unknown compound51.2242sh, 270697584, 535b, 373, 355373b, 3551620.57 ± 0.03
21Unknown compound52.2-963777, 613b, 463, 299--0.49 ± 0.01
22Quercetin-O-galloylpentoside52.9251, 263sh, 352585327, 285b, 255505, 433, 301b, 283, 257, 229, 179, 151-0.78 ± 0.13
23Unknown compound67.6224, 255, 269sh533515, 501, 472, 443, 384, 371b, 356, 335, 315--11.34 ± 0.05
DE—dry extract; s—comparisons with a chemical standard have been made; t—tentative assignment; b—base peak (the most abundant ion in recorded spectrum); in bold—ions subjected to MS2 or MS3 fragmentation; NL—normalization level (base peak intensity).
Table
Table 3. The extrapolated IC50 values for the various leukemic cell lines.
Table 3. The extrapolated IC50 values for the various leukemic cell lines.
Cell LineIC50 (µg/mL)
HL-6012.3 ± 2.1
HL-60/MX13.3 ± 0.4
HL-60/MX217.8 ± 2.4
CEM/C116.9 ± 1.9
CCRF/CEM6.2 ± 0.7
Table
Table 4. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic content and cytotoxicity of P. rotundifolia leaves.
Table 4. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic content and cytotoxicity of P. rotundifolia leaves.
r (p) forHL-60 (IC50)HL-60/MX1 (IC50)HL-60/MX2 (IC50)CCRF-CEM (IC50)CEM/C1 (IC50)
HL-60 (IC50)X0.9983 (0.002)0.9992 (0.001)0.9981 (0.002)0.6715 (0.329)
HL-60/MX1 (IC50)0.9983 (0.002)X0.9998 (0.000)0.9999 (0.000)0.627 (0.373)
HL-60/MX2 (IC50)0.9992 (0.001)0.9998 (0.000)X0.9998 (0.000)0.6421 (0.358)
CCRF-CEM (IC50)0.9981 (0.002)0.9999 (0.000)0.9998 (0.000)X0.6249 (0.375)
CEM/C1 (IC50)0.6715 (0.329)0.627 (0.373)0.6421 (0.358)0.6249 (0.375)X
TPC (GAE)−0.8053 (0.195)−0.8386 (0.161)−0.8278 (0.172)−0.8401 (0.160)−0.1014 (0.899)
TFC (QE)−0.4165 (0.583)−0.4165 (0.583)−0.3987 (0.601)−0.4189 (0.581)0.4471 (0.553)
GTC (GAE)0.9972 (0.003)0.9999 (0.000)0.9994 (0.001)0.9999 (0.000)0.6146 (0.385)
r—correlation coefficients; p—probability; TPC—total phenolic content; TFC—total flavonoid content; GTC—total gallotannin content.
Table
Table 5. The antioxidant activity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl free radical scavenging assay (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline]-6-sulfonic acid decolorization assay (ABTS), metal chelating (CHEL), β-carotene bleaching protocol) of extract from the leaves of P. rotundifolia. Each value is expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Radical scavenging activity or DPPH for ascorbic acid (standard) EC50 = 0.08 ± 0.03 mg/mL; metal chelating activity (CHEL) for ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (standard) EC50 = 0.45 ± 0.07 mg/mL; β-carotene bleaching assay for butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (standard) EC50 = 0.02 ± 0.01 mg/mL; DE—dry extract.
Table 5. The antioxidant activity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl free radical scavenging assay (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis[3-ethylbenzthiazoline]-6-sulfonic acid decolorization assay (ABTS), metal chelating (CHEL), β-carotene bleaching protocol) of extract from the leaves of P. rotundifolia. Each value is expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Radical scavenging activity or DPPH for ascorbic acid (standard) EC50 = 0.08 ± 0.03 mg/mL; metal chelating activity (CHEL) for ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (standard) EC50 = 0.45 ± 0.07 mg/mL; β-carotene bleaching assay for butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (standard) EC50 = 0.02 ± 0.01 mg/mL; DE—dry extract.
Antioxidant Activity
DPPH (EC50 mg/mL)0.2 ± 0.01
ABTS (TEAC mmol Trolox/g DE)0.6 ± 0.03
CHEL (EC50 mg/mL)1.4 ± 0.20
β-Carotene/linoleic acid (EC50 mg/mL)0.1 ± 0.03
Table
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic content and antioxidant activity tests of P. rotundifolia leaves. Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assay (β-C/LA).
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between phenolic content and antioxidant activity tests of P. rotundifolia leaves. Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), β-carotene/linoleic acid bleaching assay (β-C/LA).
r (p) forDPPH (EC50)ABTS (TEAC)CHEL (EC50)ß-C/LA (EC50)
DPPH (EC50)X0.6612 (0.339)−0.6292 (0.371)0.6595 (0.340)
ABTS (TE)0.6612 (0.339)X0.1672 (0.833)−0.1279 (0.872)
CHEL (EC50)−0.6292 (0.371)0.1672 (0.833)X−0.9992 (0.001)
ß-C/LA (EC50)0.6595 (0.340)−0,1279 (0.872)−0.9992 (0.001)X
TPC (GAE)0.9300 (0.070)0.8906 (0.109)−0.2994 (0.701)0.3371 (0.663)
TFC (QE)0.9822 (0.018)0.5087 (0.491)−0.7638 (0.236)0.7888 (0.211)
GTC (GAE)−0.5925 (0.408)−0.9961 (0.004)−0.2534 (0.747)0.2148 (0.785)
r—correlation coefficients; p—probability; TPC—total phenolic content; TFC—total flavonoid content; GTC—total gallotannin content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szewczyk, K.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Vorobets, N.; Grzywa-Celińska, A.; Granica, S. Phenolic Composition of the Leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. and Their Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071749

AMA Style

Szewczyk K, Bogucka-Kocka A, Vorobets N, Grzywa-Celińska A, Granica S. Phenolic Composition of the Leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. and Their Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity. Molecules. 2020; 25(7):1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szewczyk, Katarzyna, Anna Bogucka-Kocka, Natalia Vorobets, Anna Grzywa-Celińska, and Sebastian Granica. 2020. "Phenolic Composition of the Leaves of Pyrola rotundifolia L. and Their Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity" Molecules 25, no. 7: 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071749

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop