Next Article in Journal
Characterization of a Flavonoid 3’/5’/7-O-Methyltransferase from Citrus reticulata and Evaluation of the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Its Methylated Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Perceptions and Misconceptions in Molecular Recognition: Key Factors in Self-Assembling Multivalent (SAMul) Ligands/Polyanions Selectivity
Previous Article in Journal
First Cobalt(II) Spin Crossover Compound with N4S2-Donorset
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Ionic Carbosilane Dendrons Possessing Fluorinated Tails at Different Locations on the Skeleton
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Telodendrimer-Based Macromolecular Drug Design using 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition for Applications in Biology

1
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montréal, QC H3A 0B8, Canada
2
Department of Chemistry, Shahid Beheshti University G.C., Tehran 1983963113, Iran
3
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montréal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 857; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040857
Submission received: 21 January 2020 / Revised: 11 February 2020 / Accepted: 12 February 2020 / Published: 15 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dendrimers in Biomedicine)

Abstract

:
An architectural polymer containing hydrophobic isoxazole-based dendron and hydrophilic polyethylene glycol linear tail is prepared by a combination of the robust ZnCl2 catalyzed alkyne-nitrile oxide 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition and esterification chemistry. This water soluble amphiphilic telodendrimer acts as a macromolecular biologically active agent and shows concentration dependent reduction of glioblastoma (U251) cell survival.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The isoxazole moiety, a five-membered heterocycle containing oxygen and nitrogen at adjacent positions, has shown interesting biological properties including anticancer [1], antimicrobial [1], antibacterial [2], anti-inflammatory [3], antiviral [4], antithrombic [5], antiapoptotic [6] and antiparasitic activity [7]. For example, NVP-AUY922 (Figure 1A) is an anticancer agent [1] and thiophen-2-yl isoxazole (Figure 1B) significantly inhibits proliferation of HeLa cells. Isoxazole with a steroid moiety (Figure 1C) has displayed considerable cytotoxicity towards tumor cell lines and sulfisoxazole, flucloxacillin, dicloxacillin, oxacillin, sulfamethoxazole and cloxacillin are some examples of marketed antimicrobial drugs bearing an isoxazole ring [8]. Valdecoxib (Figure 1D) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that was targeted towards cyclooxygenase enzymes to hinder prostaglandin biosynthesis and to reduce pain [8]. About thirty patents covering different isoxazole-based structures have been reported showing a wide array of chemical modifications and applications of such compounds [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Macromolecular therapeutics are increasingly proposed as nanomedicines [19] and new methodologies to prepare highly potent isoxazoles bearing nanocarriers and nanotherapeutics will likely expand the scope of their applications.
A tremendous research effort has been devoted to developing nanocarriers that could deliver active pharmaceutical agents to the sites affected by pathological changes to minimize wide body distribution and reduce undesirable side effects [20,21]. Amphiphilic linear block copolymers have been extensively explored in assembling core-corona type spherical micelle structures for drug delivery [22]. It is now well known that the overall macromolecular composition and structure play a vital role in modulating important parameters including plasma residence time and drug loading/controlled release behavior in these formulations [23]. This has led to expanding the macromolecular space from linear-to-branched-to-hyperbranched architectures [24]. Telodendrimers that are hybrids of hyperbranched dendrimers and linear polymers have offered an advantageous platform in combining individual properties of these components [25,26,27,28,29].
Considering the biological potency of isoxazoles, we were interested in developing synthetic methodologies to water-soluble macromolecular drugs using amphiphilic architectural polymers, in which the hydrophobic dendron segment will contain isoxazole heterocyclic rings and a linear poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether (mPEG) tail will impart hydrophilic character. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition is among some of the most important reactions in organic and medicinal chemistry [30] and it has been used for the isoxazoles scaffold synthesis by the cycloaddition of nitrile oxides and alkynes [31]. To the best of our knowledge, employing 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction based on nitrile oxides in synthesizing dendrons/dendrimers has not been reported. We report herein such a synthetic approach to construct an isoxazole-mPEG based architecture polymer, its behavior in an aqueous medium and an assessment of its ability to act as a macromolecular agent that can reduce or even abolish viability of glioblastoma cells.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

We first explored the potential of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition strategy in the synthesis of a symmetric generation 0 dendrimer. It was begun by the propargylation of pentaerythritol using propargyl bromide with potassium hydroxide in dry DMF (Scheme 1) [32], followed by the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition on the tetrapropargylated core (3) using a bromonitrile oxide precursor (4) in THF at 45 °C for 3 h, with NaHCO3 as base and ZnCl2 as a catalyst. It afforded 5,5′-(((2,2-bis(((3-bromoisoxazol-5-yl)methoxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(methylene))bis(3-bromoisoxazole) (5) in 44% isolated yield (Scheme 1) [33].
Isoxazole bearing dendrimer 5 was not soluble in common organic solvents and it prevented us from expanding the scope of dendrimer build-up or its surface functionalization to enhance its solubility and examine its biological activity. We subsequently considered designing an architectural polymer by replacing one of the isoxazole based arm with PEG. For this proposal, we first synthesized a tripropargylated pentaerythritol core by reacting pentaerythritol with 3 equivalents of propargyl bromide [28], which leaves a free OH group at the core (6, Scheme 2). mPEG-COOH (9) was synthesized by reacting mPEG2000 with succinic anhydride in the presence of triethylamine (Et3N) in CHCl3 at 70 °C for 24 h. The esterification reaction of mPEG-COOH (9) with the tripropargylated pentaerythritol core (6) was subsequently carried out using 1,4-dimethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (DPTS) and diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIPC) in dry CH2Cl2. The desired telodendrimer with isoxazole rings was subsequently synthesized using a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction on 10, using a bromonitrile oxide precursor (Scheme 2).
Telodendrimer 11 was soluble in common organic solvents and it was characterized using a combination of techniques including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry. Its aqueous behavior was first examined using 1H NMR in D2O (Figure 2). As expected, dendron peaks become broad while those related to polyethylene glycol retained their original peak configurations. This suggests that the telodendrimer assumes a hydrophobic core/hydrophilic corona type structure in D2O.
We examined similar self-assembly of the telodendrimer using an acetone/water co-solvent evaporation method [34,35,36]. The resulting assemblies were characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 3). These suggested that spherical structures were formed with a size distribution of 200 and ~60 nm, as measured by DLS and TEM respectively. As is common with solution based DLS measurements, hydrodynamic sizes of these assemblies were found to be higher as compared to TEM [37]. We were unable to obtain a critical micelle concentration of the assembled structures using pyrene encapsulation. This may suggest that pyrene does not get incorporated into the hydrophobic core due to inability of the self-assembled structures from these telodendrimers to solubilize pyrene [38]. However, using the DLS intensity method, an inflection point was measured to be at 0.35 mg/mL. This value is high and suggests that at dilutions encountered during circulation, the particles observed through DLS and TEM will be disassembled.

2.2. Isoxazole Telodendrimer Reduces Glioblastoma Cell Viability

We explored the concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of the telodendrimer using cell viability assay. Brain tumor cells (U251N) were treated with increasing concentrations of the telodendrimer, ranging from 1 nM to 100 µM and cell nuclei were counted after 24 h and 72 h. As an additional control, cells were treated with 15% milli-q (MQ) water, since the telodendrimer was diluted in milli-q water to make stock concentrations. The presence of MQ water did not affect cell viability. None of the concentrations below 10 µM caused significant cell death after 24 h and 72 h (Figure 4). However, 100 µM concentration of the telodendrimer significantly reduced the number of viable cells to 9.89% and 1.35% after 24 h and 72 h, respectively (Figure 4). Results from this study demonstrate that isoxazole-based telodendrimer acts as a macromolecular drug and exhibits good cytotoxicity towards U251N cells. Isoxazole based compounds, such as NVP-AUY922 [39], as well as Leflunomide [40] exhibit anti-tumor activity. Certain 3,5-diaryl isoxazole linked 2,3-dihydroquinazolinones are cytotoxic towards U251N cells. These compounds kill cells by disrupting microtubules and fragmenting cell nuclei [41]. Morphological abnormalities seen in U251 glioblastoma cells exposed to the telodendrimer included pyknotic nuclei, suggesting a small contribution of apoptotic cell death. Analysis of mitochondrial functions in these cells (using tetrazolium salt, an indicator of mitochondrial metabolic activity) showed reduced function of these organelles upon telodendrimer treatment. Mitochondrial functional impairment was also concentration dependent; it was most profound in > 10 μM telodendrimer concentrations and it correlated with the decline in glioblastoma cell number. We are currently investigating several modes of cell death caused by isoxazole-based telodendrimers including ferroptosis [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Our further aim in this direction is to explore cell death mechanism, to identify the implicated signal transduction pathways.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

The NMR spectra were recorded on AV 400 and 500 MHz (Bruker, Beerlika, MA, USA) spectrometers both equipped with BBFO+ smart probes. Mass spectra analyses (HRMS, ESI) were performed on an Exactive Plus Orbitrap-API (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) high resolution mass spectrometer. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), ChemImpex International (Wood Dale, IL, USA), Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA), Fisher scientific (Hampton, NH, USA) and ACP Chemicals (Saint-Leonard, QC, Canada), and were used without further purification. Dry solvents were obtained from a solvent purification system. TEM samples for imaging were prepared by placing a 10 µL drop of the polymeric micelle solution (2 mg/mL) onto a carbon-coated copper grid. Excess solution was removed after 2 min using a Whatman filter paper. 10 µL of 2% uranyl acetate was then dropped onto the grid, left for 2 min and excess removed by a Whatman filter paper as before. The grid was then left to dry for an additional 20 min before imaging.

3.2. Synthesis

3-(3-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2,2-bis((prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)methyl)propoxy)prop-1-yne
Molecules 25 00857 i001
A mixture of pentaerythritol (1.00 g, 7.35 mmol) and potassium hydroxide (6.25 g, 0.112 mol) in dry DMF (25 mL) was stirred at 0 °C under nitrogen. After 5 min a solution of propargyl bromide (7.8 mL, 0.084 mol) in toluene (80%) was added drop wise and the reaction mixture was left to stir for 24 h. After completion of the reaction, water was added, and the compound was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL) and washed with brine. The organic layer was isolated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the desired product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc = 8.5:1.5) (Yield: 1.2 g, 57%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 2.41 (4H, t, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, C≡CH), 3.52 (8H, s, C-CH2-O), 4.12 (8H, d, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, O-CH2-C≡C). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 44.8, 58.7, 69.0, 74.0, 80.0.
5,5′-(((2,2-bis(((3-bromoisoxazol-5-yl)methoxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(methylene))bis(3-bromoisoxazole).
Molecules 25 00857 i002
A mixture of tetrakis(2-propynyloxymethyl) methane (0.288 g, 0.001 mol), dibromoformaldoxime (1.010 g, 0.005 mol), ZnCl2 (40 mol%) and NaHCO3 (0.672 g, 0.008 mol) in THF (5 mL) was stirred at 45 °C for 3 h. The solvent was then removed under vacuum and the crude mixture was washed with H2O (10 mL), diethyl ether (10 mL) and then dried to afford the desired pure product (Yield: 0.340 g, 44%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH (ppm) 3.43 (8H, s, C-CH2-O), 4.60 (8H, s, O-CH2-isoxazole ring), 6.76 (4H, s, HC=C).
3-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-2,2-bis((prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)methyl)propan-1-ol
Molecules 25 00857 i003
A mixture of pentaerythritol (1.00 g, 7.35 mmol) and potassium hydroxide (2.8 g, 0.05 mol) in dry dimethylformamide (DMF, 20 mL) was stirred at 0 °C under nitrogen. After 5 min a solution of propargyl bromide (4.76 g, 5.95 mL, 0.040 mol) in toluene (80%) was added drop wise to the reaction mixture. After warming to room temperature slowly, the reaction mixture was left to stir for 24 h at 40 °C under nitrogen. After completion of the reaction and cooling to room temperature, water was added to the mixture and the compound extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL) and washed with brine. The organic layers were isolated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under vacuum. Purification of the crude material was done by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc = 7.5:2.5) to afford the desired product (Yield: 1.1 g, 60%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 2.43 (3H, t, 4JHH = 2.5 Hz, C≡CH), 3.56 (6H, s, C-CH2-O), 3.68 (2H, s, CH2-OH), 4.12 (6H, d,4JHH = 2.5 Hz, O-CH2-C≡C). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 44.6, 58.7, 64.9, 70.1, 74.5, 79.6.
mPEG2000-COOH
Molecules 25 00857 i004
A mixture of poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether 2000 (mPEG 2000) (3g, 1.5 mmol), succinic anhydride (0.25 g, 0.002 mol) and Et₃N (0.2 ml, 0.0015 mol) in CHCl3 (5 mL), was refluxed at 70 °C for 24 h. After completion of the reaction, water was added to the mixture and the compound was extracted (3 × 10 mL) with chloroform and washed with brine. The organic layer was isolated and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure and dried. The solid residue was purified further from CHCl3/Ether (1:5) to afford the pure product with a yield of 2.7 g, 86%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 2.66 (4H, m, -CH2-CH2-COOH), 3.40 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.11–3.85 (178 H, m, PEG), 4.28 (2H, t, 3JHH = 4 Hz, -CH2-OCO-). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 29.4, 44.9, 58.9, 63.6, 68.9, 70.5, 71.8, 172.4, 174.6.
mPEG2000-tripropargyl pentaerythritol
Molecules 25 00857 i005
In a three-neck flask mPEG-COOH (2.1 g, 0.001 mol), tripropargyl pentaerythritol (0.25 g, 0.001 mol) and DPTS (0.279 g, 0.001 mol) were dissolved in dry CH2Cl2. A solution of diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIPC 0.176 g, 0.0014 mol) in dry CH2Cl2 was added dropwise to the flask over 1.5 h under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction was stirred for 24 h. Water was then added and the compound extracted (2 × 10 mL) with dichloromethane. The mixture was then washed with NaHCO3 (5%) and extracted with CH2Cl2. After that, the organic layer was washed with brine and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude material was done by column chromatography (CH2Cl2/methanol = 10:1) (Yield: 0.750 g, 32%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm) 2.46 (3H, t, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, C≡CH), 2.67 (4H, m, O=C-CH2-CH2-C=O), 3.40 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.66 (180H PEG and 8H C-CH2-O, m), 4.13 (6H, d, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, O-CH2-C≡C). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 29.0, 29.1, 44.0, 63.6, 63.8, 68.6, 68.9, 69.0, 70.5, 71.9, 74.4, 79.7, 171.7, 172.2.
mPEG2000-isoxazole
Molecules 25 00857 i006
A mixture of mPEG-tripropargylpentaerythritol (0.5 g, 0.00021 mol), ZnCl2 (30 mol%) and NaHCO3 (0.1 g, 0.00126 mol) in THF (5 mL) was stirred at 45 °C under nitrogen overnight. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude was extracted three times with CH2Cl2. After that the organic layer was washed with brine and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solid residue after removing solvent in vacuo was purified using a mixture of CHCl3/Ether (1:5) to afford the desired pure product with a yield of 0.3 g, 52%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH (ppm)2.60 (2H, t, 3JHH = 5 Hz, O=C-CH2-CH2-C=O), 2.67 (2H, t, 3JHH = 5 Hz, O=C-CH2-CH2-C=O), 3.40 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.48-4.25 (PEG and 8H C-CH2-O, m), 4.57 (6H, s, O-CH2-isoxazole ring), 6.36 (3H, s, HC=C). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC (ppm) 28.9, 44.6, 59.0, 62.5, 63.91, 63.94, 69.0, 70.1, 70.3, 70.4, 71.8, 77.2, 106.6, 140.4, 170.8, 171.9, 172.3. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δH (ppm) 2.56 (4H, broad, O=C-CH2-CH2-C=O), 3.30 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.20-4.14 (PEG and 8H C-CH2-O, m), 4.50 (6H, broad, O-CH2-isoxazole ring), 6.43 (3H, broad, HC=C). ESI-HRMS: m/z = 2710 [M + Na+].

3.3. Methods

Telodendrimer stock solutions were prepared in MilliQ water (500 µM) and polymer itself was dissolved in DMSO. Different concentrations (1 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 15 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM and 100 µM) were prepared by serial dilutions and used to treat cells as described below.

3.4. Cell Culture

Human U251N GBM cells were originally obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA). They were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies Inc. Burlington, ON, Canada) with 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S; Gibco). Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity.

3.5. Cell Viability Assay

U251N GBM cells were seeded in 96 well plates (5000 cells/well) for 24 h. They were then exposed to different concentrations of the telodendrimer (1 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 15 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM and 100 µM) for 24 h or 72 h before being fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The fixed cells were then washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 10 µM Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) for 10 min. This solution was aspirated and replaced with PBS. The cells were then imaged using Leica Fluorescence Microscope (DMI4000B). Images for each condition were analyzed using ImageJ. Cell viability was measured by cell counting. At least one hundred cells were analyzed in 9 random fields per cover slip per condition. Three independent experiments were performed. The cell loss was expressed as % relative to untreated or vehicle (DMSO) treated controls.

3.6. Statistics

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of Mean). Student’s t-tests were used for statistical analyses. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Microsoft Excel’s inbuilt statistical functions were used for all calculations.

4. Conclusions

A simple synthetic methodology based on the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between an alkyne based core and a bromonitrile oxide, followed by esterification for a stitching hydrophilic polyethylene glycol tail to the core, provides a novel route to architectural polymers containing an isoxazole-based dendron. The addition of a polyethylene glycol tail to the telodendrimer confers solubility in a variety of solvents including aqueous medium, as well as steric stability to the telodendrimer structure [51,52]. These architectural polymers are candidate macromolecular agents exerting marked loss of notoriously resistant glioblastoma cells to therapeutic interventions and our results show that U251N glioblastoma cells are almost completely eliminated when exposed to the telodendrimer. Considering that combination therapy has been proven to be superior to monotherapy for cancer treatment [53], different anti-cancer drugs together with this telodendrimer [25,28] merit further investigations. Certain nanotherapeutics such as liposomal doxorubicin [54] and PTX-loaded human serum albumin nanoaggregates [55] are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cancer nanotherapeutics. However, their relatively large size (130 nm diameter) restricts tissue penetration and retention. In contrast, telodendrimer based nanoformulations have a smaller size and could potentially be alternative combination anticancer nanotherapeutics. The new methodology presented here provides a versatile platform to expand the scope of isoxazole based systems in nanomedicine. The dendron-linear polymer space in these architectural polymers could be tuned for desired core-corona type assemblies with low critical micelle concentrations. Their potential for combination therapies needs to be further explored by covalent and non-covalent linking of anti-tumor agents, as well as the incorporation of cell surface binding molecular probes for an improved cell-type specificity.

Author Contributions

A.K. and H.Y. conceived the project. A.K., H.Y. and A.B. designed experiments. D.M. provided biological background and advising for experimental design. H.Y. synthesized and characterized telodendrimer. E.K. provided data for Figure 4. H.Y., A.K. and D.M. contributed to writing the manuscript. A.K., D.M., H.Y. and A.B. edited and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (AK: RGPIN 2018-05610, and DM: RGPIN 04994-15) and Canadian Institute of Health Research (DM: MOP-119425).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Quebec Center for Advanced Materials/The Center Québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnels (QCAM/CQMF), the Research Council of Shahid Beheshti University and the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jensen, M.R.; Schoepfer, J.; Radimerski, T.; Massey, A.; Guy, C.T.; Brueggen, J.; Quadt, C.; Buckler, A.; Cozens, R.; Drysdale, M.J. NVP-AUY922: A small molecule HSP90 inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical breast cancer models. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10, R33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jancel, T.; Dudas, V. Management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. West. J. Med. 2002, 176, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rakesh, K.S.; Jagadish, S.; Balaji, K.S.; Zameer, F.; Swaroop, T.R.; Mohan, C.D.; Jayarama, S.; Rangappa, K.S. 3, 5-disubstituted isoxazole derivatives: Potential inhibitors of inflammation and Cancer. Inflammation 2016, 39, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kuz’min, V.E.; Artemenko, A.G.; Muratov, E.N.; Volineckaya, I.L.; Makarov, V.A.; Riabova, O.B.; Wutzler, P.; Schmidtke, M. Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Studies of [(Biphenyloxy) propyl] isoxazole Derivatives. Inhibitors of Human Rhinovirus 2 Replication. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 4205–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Selvam, C.; Jachak, S.M.; Thilagavathi, R.; Chakraborti, A.K. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking of curcumin analogues as antioxidant, cyclooxygenase inhibitory and anti-inflammatory agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1793–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chakraborti, S.; Dhar, G.; Dwivedi, V.; Das, A.; Poddar, A.; Chakraborti, G.; Basu, G.; Chakrabarti, P.; Surolia, A.; Bhattacharyya, B. Stable and potent analogues derived from the modification of the dicarbonyl moiety of curcumin. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 7449–7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almahariq, M.; Tsalkova, T.; Mei, F.C.; Chen, H.; Zhou, J.; Sastry, S.K.; Schwede, F.; Cheng, X. A novel EPAC-specific inhibitor suppresses pancreatic cancer cell migration and invasion. Mol. Pharmacol. 2013, 83, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhu, J.; Mo, J.; Lin, H.Z.; Chen, Y.; Sun, H.-P. The recent progress of isoxazole in medicinal chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 3065–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Drysdale, M.J.; Dymock, B.W.; Finch, H.; Webb, P.; McDonald, E.; James, K.E.; Cheung, K.M.; Matthews, T.P. Isoxazole Compounds as Inhibitors of Heat Shock Proteins. U.S. Patent 2017326152 A1, 16 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. FU, J.; Jin, X.; Karur, S.; Lapointe, G.; Madera, A.M.; Sweeney, Z.K. Isoxazole Hydroxamic Acid Compounds as LpxC Inhibitors. U.S. Patent 20180030004 A1, 1 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu, J.P.; Jiang, S.Y.; Kordikowski, A.; Sweeney, Z.K. Crystalline Isoxazole Hydroxamic Acid Compounds. U.S. Patent 2017355684 A1, 14 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Foley Megan, A.C.; Kuntz, K.W.; Mills James, E.J.; Mitchell, L.H.; Munchhof, M.J.; Harvey, D.M. Isoxazole Carboxamide Compounds. U.S. Patent 2017190676 A1, 6 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Duggan, M.E. Deuterated Isoxazole Derivatives and Their Use as Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Potentiators. WO2017089892 A1, 25 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sun, O.Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, B.; He, Y.; Xing, X.; Shen, R.; Granger, B.; He, J.; Long, J.; Wang, G. Isoxazole Analogs As FXR Agonists And Methods Of Use Thereof. U.S. Patent 2017334893 A1, 23 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, O.Y.; He, Y.; Shen, R.C.; Xing, X.; Granger, B.; Wang, B.; Ma, J.; He, J.; Long, J.; Wang, G. Isoxazole Derivatives As FXR Agonists And Methods Of Use Thereof. U.S. Patent 2017334894 A1, 23 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Das, A.M.; Hazarika, M.P.; Deka, B.P. Diosgenin Acetate-Isoxazole Derivatives, Process for Preparation Thereof and Their Antifungal Activity. WO2016135749 A1, 1 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kotoku, M.; Maeba, T.; Seki, N.; Hirashima, S.; Fujioka, S.; Obika, S.; Yamanaka, H.; Yokota, M.; Sakai, T.; Hirata, K.; et al. Triazole-Isoxazole Compound And Medical USE Thereof. U.S. Patent 2016137639 A1, 19 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cole, B.; Kolodziej, A. Isoxazole Compounds and Methods for the Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. U.S. Patent 2016128984 A1, 12 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, J.; Kopecek, J. Macromolecular therapeutics. J. Control. Rel. 2014, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fenton, O.S.; Olafson, K.N.; Pillai, P.S.; Mitchell, M.J.; Langer, R. Advances in biomaterials for drug delivery. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sabourian, P.; Tavakolian, M.; Yazdani, H.; Frounchi, M.; van de Ven, T.G.M.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Stimuli-responsive chitosan as an advantageous platform for efficient delivery of bioactive agents. J. Control. Rel. 2020, 317, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bodratti, A.M.; Alexandridis, P. Amphiphilic block copolymers in drug delivery: Advances in formulation structure and performance. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2018, 15, 1085–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Agrahari, V.; Agrahari, V.; Mitra, A.K. Nanocarrier fabrication and macromolecule drug delivery: Challenges and opportunities. Ther. Deliv. 2016, 7, 257–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kakkar, A.; Traverso, G.; Farokhzad, O.C.; Weissleder, R.; Langer, R. Evolution of macromolecular complexity in drug delivery systems. Nat. Rev. Chem 2017, 1, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moquin, A.; Sturn, J.; Zhang, I.; Ji, J.; von Celsing, R.; Vali, H.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Unraveling aqueous self-assembly of telodendrimers to shed light on their efficacy in drug encapsulation. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 4515–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Guo, D.; Luo, J.; Nangia, S. Drug-specific design of telodendrimer architecture for effective doxorubicin encapsulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 9766–9777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, K.; Suby, N.; Li, Y.; Lam, K.S. Telodendrimer-based nanocarriers for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ther. Deliv. 2013, 4, 1279–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Choi, J.; Moquin, A.; Bomal, E.; Na, L.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Telodendrimers for physical encapsulation and covalent linking of individual or combined therapeutics. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 2607–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, J.; Venkataramanan, R.; Li, S. PEG-farnesyl thiosalicylic acid telodendrimer micelles as an improved formulation for targeted delivery of paclitaxel. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 2807–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Padwa, A.; Pearson, W.H. Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry Toward Heterocycles and Natural Products; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Volume 59. [Google Scholar]
  31. Balalaie, S.; Shamakli, M.; Nikbakht, A.; Alavijeh, N.S.; Rominger, F.; Rostamizadeh, S.; Bijanzadeh, H.R. Direct access to isoxazolino and isoxazolo benzazepines from 2-((hydroxyimino) methyl) benzoic acid via a post-Ugi heteroannulation. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 5737–5742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ladd, E.; Sheikhi, A.; Li, N.; van de Ven, T.; Kakkar, A. Design and synthesis of dendrimers with facile surface group functionalization, and an evaluation of their bactericidal efficacy. Molecules 2017, 22, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yazdani, H.; Bazgir, A. Lewis Acid Catalyzed Regio-and Diastereoselective Synthesis of Spiroisoxazolines via One-Pot Sequential Knoevenagel Condensation/1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reaction. Synthesis 2019, 51, 1669–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sharma, A.; Mejía, D.; Regnaud, A.l.; Uhlig, N.; Li, C.-J.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Combined A3 coupling and click chemistry approach for the synthesis of dendrimer-based biological tools. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 1079–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharma, A.; Kakkar, A. Designing dendrimer and miktoarm polymer based multi-tasking nanocarriers for efficient medical therapy. Molecules 2015, 20, 16987–17015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moquin, A.; Sharma, A.; Cui, Y.; Lau, A.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Asymmetric AB3 Miktoarm Star Polymers: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Study of Micelle Stability Using AF4 for Efficient Drug Delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, 15, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lam, T.; Avti, P.K.; Pouliot, P.; Tardif, J.-C.; Rhéaume, É.; Lesage, F.; Kakkar, A. Surface engineering of SPIONs: Role of phosphonate ligand multivalency in tailoring their efficacy. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 415602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nakahara, Y.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Akashi, M. New fluorescence method for the determination of the critical micelle concentration by photosensitive monoazacryptand derivative. Langmuir 2005, 21, 6688–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eccles, S.A.; Massey, A.; Raynaud, F.I.; Sharp, S.Y.; Box, G.; Valenti, M.; Patterson, L.; de Haven Brandon, A.; Gowan, S.; Boxall, F. NVP-AUY922: A novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor active against xenograft tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 2850–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Felip, E.; Barlesi, F.; Besse, B.; Chu, Q.; Gandhi, L.; Kim, S.-W.; Carcereny, E.; Sequist, L.V.; Brunsvig, P.; Chouaid, C. Phase 2 Study of the HSP-90 Inhibitor AUY922 in Previously Treated and Molecularly Defined Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kamal, A.; Bharathi, E.V.; Reddy, J.S.; Ramaiah, M.J.; Dastagiri, D.; Reddy, M.K.; Viswanath, A.; Reddy, T.L.; Shaik, T.B.; Pushpavalli, S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3,5-diaryl isoxazoline/isoxazole linked 2, 3-dihydroquinazolinone hybrids as anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kepp, O.; Galluzzi, L.; Zitvogel, L.; Kroemer, G. Pyroptosis–A cell death modality of its kind? Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 627–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aglietti, R.A.; Dueber, E.C. Recent Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis and Gasdermin Family Functions. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kovacs, S.B.; Miao, E.A. Gasdermins: Effectors of Pyroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dixon, S.J.; Stockwell, B.R. The hallmarks of ferroptosis. Ann. Rev. Can. Biol. 2019, 3, 35–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dixon, S.J. Ferroptosis: Bug or feature? Immunol. Rev. 2017, 277, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, W.S.; Stockwell, B.R. Ferroptosis: Death by Lipid Peroxidation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Angeli, J.P.F.; Shah, R.; Pratt, D.A.; Conrad, M. Ferroptosis Inhibition: Mechanisms and Opportunities. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stockwell, B.R.; Friedmann Angeli, J.P.; Bayir, H.; Bush, A.I.; Conrad, M.; Dixon, S.J.; Fulda, S.; Gascón, S.; Hatzios, S.K.; Kagan, V.E.; et al. Ferroptosis: A Regulated Cell Death Nexus Linking Metabolism, Redox Biology, and Disease. Cell 2017, 171, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Shen, Z.; Song, J.; Yung, B.C.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, A.; Chen, X. Emerging Strategies of Cancer Therapy Based on Ferroptosis. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wolfrum, C.; Shi, S.; Jayaprakash, K.N.; Jayaraman, M.; Wang, G.; Pandey, R.K.; Rajeev, K.G.; Nakayama, T.; Charrise, K.; Ndungo, E.M. Mechanisms and optimization of in vivo delivery of lipophilic siRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.; Tan, S.; Li, S.; Shen, Q.; Wang, K. Cancer drug delivery in the nano era: An overview and perspectives. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mokhtari, R.B.; Homayouni, T.S.; Baluch, N.; Morgatskaya, E.; Kumar, S.; Das, B.; Yeger, H. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 38022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Franco, Y.L.; Vaidya, T.R.; Ait-Oudhia, S. Anticancer and cardio-protective effects of liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2018, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ge, L.; You, X.; Huang, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Hai, Q. Human albumin fragments nanoparticles as PTX carrier for improved anti-cancer efficacy. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Selected examples of bioactive isoxazoles: A, B and C, 3,4,5-isoxazole and fused isoxazole derivatives with anticancer; and D, 3,4,5-isoxazole derivative with anti-inflammatory activity.
Figure 1. Selected examples of bioactive isoxazoles: A, B and C, 3,4,5-isoxazole and fused isoxazole derivatives with anticancer; and D, 3,4,5-isoxazole derivative with anti-inflammatory activity.
Molecules 25 00857 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 5,5′-(((2,2-bis(((3-bromoisoxazol-5-yl)methoxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(methylene))bis(3-bromoisoxazole).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 5,5′-(((2,2-bis(((3-bromoisoxazol-5-yl)methoxy)methyl)propane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(methylene))bis(3-bromoisoxazole).
Molecules 25 00857 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of isoxazole-mPEG architectural polymer (11).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of isoxazole-mPEG architectural polymer (11).
Molecules 25 00857 sch002
Figure 2. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (500 MHz) spectrum of isoxazole telodendrimer in D2O (A) and CDCl3 (B).
Figure 2. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (500 MHz) spectrum of isoxazole telodendrimer in D2O (A) and CDCl3 (B).
Molecules 25 00857 g002
Figure 3. (A) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) size distribution and (B) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image for the aqueous assemblies of isoxazole telodenderimer. The concentration of the polymeric micelle solution was 2 mg/mL for TEM study.
Figure 3. (A) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) size distribution and (B) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image for the aqueous assemblies of isoxazole telodenderimer. The concentration of the polymeric micelle solution was 2 mg/mL for TEM study.
Molecules 25 00857 g003
Figure 4. Glioblastoma cell viability studies: U251N cells were treated with aqueous formulations of the telodendrimer (1 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM and 100 µM) for up to 72 h. Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342. Vehicle indicates 15% milli-q water. More than 130 images were analyzed for each condition. Number of cells were quantified by imaging them using Leica Fluorescent Microscope.
Figure 4. Glioblastoma cell viability studies: U251N cells were treated with aqueous formulations of the telodendrimer (1 nM, 1 µM, 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM and 100 µM) for up to 72 h. Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342. Vehicle indicates 15% milli-q water. More than 130 images were analyzed for each condition. Number of cells were quantified by imaging them using Leica Fluorescent Microscope.
Molecules 25 00857 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yazdani, H.; Kaul, E.; Bazgir, A.; Maysinger, D.; Kakkar, A. Telodendrimer-Based Macromolecular Drug Design using 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition for Applications in Biology. Molecules 2020, 25, 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040857

AMA Style

Yazdani H, Kaul E, Bazgir A, Maysinger D, Kakkar A. Telodendrimer-Based Macromolecular Drug Design using 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition for Applications in Biology. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yazdani, Hossein, Esha Kaul, Ayoob Bazgir, Dusica Maysinger, and Ashok Kakkar. 2020. "Telodendrimer-Based Macromolecular Drug Design using 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition for Applications in Biology" Molecules 25, no. 4: 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040857

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop