Next Article in Journal
Lights and Shadows of Gold Introduction into Beta Zeolite
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluorescence Enhancement by Calixarene Supramolecular Aggregate
Previous Article in Journal
Lactoferrin and Its Derived Peptides: An Alternative for Combating Virulence Mechanisms Developed by Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Conformational Exchanges of Biphen[3]arene Macrocycle

1
Center for Supramolecular Chemistry and Catalysis and Department of Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
2
Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Xueyuan Blvd 1088, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Key Laboratory of Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Functional Material Chemistry, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Structure and Performance for Functional Molecules, College of Chemistry, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These two authors contributed equally to this paper.
Molecules 2020, 25(24), 5780; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245780
Submission received: 19 October 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020 / Published: 8 December 2020

Abstract

:
Conformational exchanges of synthetic macrocyclic acceptors are rather fast, which is rarely studied in the absence of guests. Here, we report multiple stimuli-responsive conformational exchanges between two preexisting conformations of 2,2′,4,4′-tetramethoxyl biphen[3]arene (MeBP3) macrocycle. Structures of these two conformations are both observed in solid state, and characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 2D NMR in solution. In particular, conformational exchanges can respond to solvents, temperatures, guest binding and acid/base addition. The current system may have a role to play in the construction of molecular switches and other stimuli-responsive systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In nature, conformational exchanges are widely involved in various kinds of biological processes [1]. In chemistry, controlled conformational exchanges of single molecules present an opportunity to control the molecular world [2]. For example, overcrowded alkenes were designed and synthesized to construct molecular switches, and their conformations can be changed predictably in response to lights [3], redox processes [4,5], temperatures [6], etc. On the other hand, molecular switches can also be constructed by host-guest complexes [7,8,9,10]. For supramolecular receptors, controlled and large amplitude conformational interconversions have been observed upon binding a guest molecule [11,12,13,14,15,16,17] or an ion [18,19,20], but the reversibly conformational exchanges of macrocycles beyond their host-guest properties have been rarely discussed [21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Synthetic macrocycles often have simple structures and fast conformational exchange kinetics [28], which are hard to detect by common kinetic techniques. Although conformational interconversions of macrocyclic acceptors can be observed in molecular recognition processes [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], slow exchanges of coexisting conformations of macrocycles have been rarely reported [37]. Developing slow conformational exchange systems of macrocycles can not only apply in the design and synthesis of molecular machines and devices [2,7,8,9,10] but also function as an important tool for host-guest binding mechanism analysis [37]. The assignment of the binding mechanism is often inconclusive in synthetic supramolecular systems because of the fast exchange kinetics [38,39]. Very recently, Jiang et al. demonstrated the strict analysis of the binding mechanism based on a macrocycle with slow conformational exchange [37].
Here, we report the stimuli-responsive conformational exchanges of 2,2’,4,4’-tetramethoxyl biphen[3]arene (MeBP3) [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The conformational exchanges between two conformers of MeBP3 were slow on the NMR timescale, and we successfully differentiated them in the 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of MeBP3. 1H-13C HMQC and HMBC spectra were employed to identify these two conformers and assign the 1D NMR signals. Particularly, stimuli-responsive conformational exchanges can be realized by solvent effect, temperature variation, guest binding and acid/base addition.

2. Results

2.1. Conformations Analysis

MeBP3 contains three 2,2′,4,4′-tetramethoxyl biphenyl sidewalls and three methylene linkers, which is structurally similar to those synthetic macrocyclic arenes like calix[n]arenes [28,30,47,48,49], resorc[4]arene [50], cyclotribenzylene [51], pillar[n]arenes [52,53,54] and other biphen[n]arenes [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Theoretically, there are two representative conformations for MeBP3, due to flipping of the biphenyl sidewalls (Figure 1a, MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II). For MeBP3-I, three biphenyl units are arranged in the same orientation, and flipping of one biphenyl panel of MeBP3-I can produce MeBP3-II [55]. Conformer MeBP3-I has D3 symmetry and thus should give rise to two singlets in 1H NMR for their aromatic signals. Conformer MeBP3-II has C2 symmetry and six singlets in the aromatic regions. If the exchanges between two conformers are slow on the NMR timescale, we can differentiate them in the NMR spectra of MeBP3.
In the 1H NMR spectrum of MeBP3 (2.0 mM), one set of two broad singlets and the other set of six broad singlets in the aromatic regions were observed (Figure 2a), indicating that MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II are coexisting in CDCl3. Two sets of broad singlets indicate that single bonds in biphenyl units rotate fast, but the overall exchanges between MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II were slow on the NMR timescale at room temperature. The 13C NMR spectrum of MeBP3 in CDCl3 was tested; six carbon signals for MeBP3-I and 18 carbon signals for MeBP3-II in the aromatic regions were observed (Figure 2b). 1H-13C HMQC and HMBC were employed to assign the 1D NMR spectra (Figures S6–S9). The minor species was assigned to MeBP3-II, while the major species was assigned to MeBP3-I, and their percentages were calculated according to the integrals in 1H NMR spectrum, which are 73% for MeBP3-I and 27% for MeBP3-II at 25 °C in CDCl3. We examined the 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in CDCl3 at a high concentration of 100 mM (Figures S1 and S2). No obvious concentration effect was observed on the distribution of conformers.
We obtained two single-crystals of MeBP3 containing CH3CN molecules or cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-DCE) molecules in unit cells [39], namely, “CH3CN@MeBP3” and “cis-DCE@MeBP3” [46], respectively. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction data suggested that the structure of MeBP3 in CH3CN@MeBP3 could be assigned to MeBP3-I, while the structure of MeBP3 in cis-DCE@MeBP3 was MeBP3-II (Figure 1b). In the solid state, MeBP3-I exhibits a triangular topology, and three biphenyl sidewalls define a cavity suitable for the linear guests with 5.43 Å diameters [39]. Flipping one biphenyl sidewall in MeBP3-I to the other side can produce MeBP3-II, which was observed in cis-DCE@MeBP3.

2.2. Solvent and Temperature Effects in Conformational Exchanges

Molecular conformations are closely related to solvents and temperatures. We therefore tested the conformational exchanges of MeBP3 in different solvents and temperatures. MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II also coexist in CD2Cl2, acetone-d6, acetonitrile-d3, toluene-d8 and xylene-d10, but their percentages were different (for MeBP3-I is 87%, 88%, 86%, 85% and 80%, respectively) at room temperature (Figure 3b). However, in high polarity solvent such as DMSO-d6, no signals for MeBP3-II were observed (Figure S4).
Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra were also examined in different solvents. At relatively high temperatures (≥50 °C), only signals for MeBP3-I were observed in all selected solvents (Figure 3c, Figures S11–S16 and Table S1), suggesting that MeBP3-I is more thermodynamically stable than MeBP3-II. Decreasing the temperatures of MeBP3’s toluene-d8 solution from 100 °C to −60 °C led to gradual transformations of the chemical equilibrium (Figure 3c). For example, at 25 °C, the percentage of MeBP3-I was 85%, while the percentage of MeBP3-II was 61% at −60 °C. That is, in low polarity solvent of toluene-d8, the chemical equilibrium leaned toward the MeBP3-II at low temperatures. However, at high temperatures, MeBP3-I was the dominant species (Table S1). In contrast, in mid-polarity solvents such as CDCl3, CD2Cl2, acetone-d6 and acetonitrile-d3, MeBP3-I was always the main conformer (Table S1). One possible reason is that the temperature-triggered conformational exchange is a solvation-driven process, CDCl3, CD2Cl2, acetone-d6 and acetonitrile-d3 can solvate MeBP3, thereby freezing the changes of chemical equilibrium [21].

2.3. Guest-Binding and Acid/Base Addition in Conformational Exchanges

Suitable guests may efficiently switch the conformations of acceptors [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. According to MeBP3’s cavity size (5.43 Å) [40] and π-electron rich characteristics [40,41,42,43,44,45,46], a linear secondary ammonium guest 1+ was chosen to study the binding properties of the macrocycle. As shown in Figure 4, in the 1H NMR spectrum of host-guest 1:1 mixtures, no signals for MeBP3-II were found, showing that the conformational exchanges were fixed in the presence of 1+. Meanwhile, the proton signals of 1+ shifted upfield dramatically (for example, ∆σ = −0.40 ppm for the protons at 2.94 ppm), suggesting that an interpenetrated complex was formed. In other words, MeBP3-I can bind 1+ efficiently, and the host-guest association can fix the conformational exchanges. Furthermore, no signals for free guest and free MeBP3 were detected, suggesting that the guest exchange kinetics of complex 1+ ⸦ MeBP3 was fast on the NMR timescale. This is in contrast to the slow interconversion kinetics between two conformers.
NMR titration experiments were employed to measure the association constants (K1, K2) between two conformers of MeBP3 and 1+ [37]. When we gradually titrated 1+ into a CDCl3 solution of MeBP3 (1.0 mM, Figures S17 and S18), the obvious shifts were observed in both two conformers’ 1H NMR signals, showing that 1+ can be recognized by both MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II. Nonlinear curve-fitting (Figure S19) gave the association constants of K1 = (3.50 ± 0.54) × 103 M−1 (1+ ⸦ MeBP3-I) and K2 = (2.27 ± 0.18) × 103 M−1 (1+ ⸦ MeBP3-II), respectively, which further indicated that MeBP3-I can bind 1+ more efficiently.
As mentioned above, the host-guest association can fix the conformational exchanges at room temperature, and the macrocycle favored the conformer MeBP3-II at low temperature intoluene-d8. Next, we investigated the influence of guest-binding toward conformational exchanges in the toluene-d8 solution of MeBP3 at −60 °C. Upon addition of 1.2 equivalents (eq.) of 1+, the 1H NMR (Figure 5b) spectra of MeBP3 suggested that the conformational exchanges were nearly fixed. In both instances the absence of resonances in the aromatic regions of 1H NMR signals suggested that the MeBP3-II nearly disappeared. Then, we expected that the 1+ can be deprotonated with the assistance of organic base n-Pr3N, which would dissociate the host-guest complex and resume the conformational exchanges. Upon further addition of 1.5 eq. n-Pr3N, the NMR spectrum almost recovered the resonances for a mixture of MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II (Figure 5b). After that, with the addition of 1.8 eq. CF3COOH, no 1H NMR signals for MeBP3-II were found in the mixture solution (Figure 5b). The re-protonation of dibutylamine re-associated the host-guest complex and fixed the conformational exchanges. That is, the conformational exchanges between MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II can be responsive to the guest binding and acid/base addition. This result also suggests that the exchange kinetics of host-guest complex is faster than the conformational exchange.

3. Discussion

In conclusion, we investigated the multiple stimuli-responsive conformational exchanges of 2,2′,4,4′-tetramethoxyl biphen[3]arene. Two preexisting conformers of MeBP3 were found in solutions with slow conformational interconversions. Structures of these two conformers were fully characterized by 1H-13C HMQC and HMBC NMR spectra. Besides, solvents, temperatures, guest binding and acid/base addition can dramatically influence the conformational exchanges. In relatively high temperatures, conformer MeBP3-I is the dominant species in all solutions, for example, percentage of MeBP3-I is >95% in CDCl3, acetone-d6, toluene-d8 and xylene-d10. In contrast, MeBP3-II is the main conformation in MeBP3’s toluene-d8 solution at −60 °C (61%). Secondary ammonium guest 1+ can enter the cavity of MeBP3 and fix the conformational exchanges, even at −60 °C in toluene-d8, whereas only MeBP3-I was observed in the host-guest mixture’s solution. The addition of acid/base can resume/re-fix the conformational interconversions of MeBP3 in the host-guest mixture’s solution. This slow conformation-exchange system may have a role to play in the binding mechanism analysis, molecular switches and stimuli-responsive materials. Studies directed to exploring these possibilities are underway.

4. Materials and Methods

2,2′,4,4′-tetramethoxy biphen[3]arene (MeBP3) was synthesized according to our previous report [39]. Secondary ammonium guest 1+·BArF was synthesized according to the literature [29]. 1H NMR (acquisition time = 3.17 s, relaxation delay = 1.00 s) and 13C NMR (acquisition time = 1.09 s, relaxation delay = 2.00 s) spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV500 instrument (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Rheinstetten, Germany). 1H-13C HMQC spectrum, 1H-13C HMBC spectrum and 2D NOESY NMR spectrum were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Rheinstetten, Germany). Variable-temperature 1H NMR (acquisition time = 2.19 s, relaxation delay = 5.00 s) spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-ECZ400SL NMR spectrometer (JEOL, Akishima-shi, Japan).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3., Figure S2: 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3, Figure S3: 13C NMR spectrum (125 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3, Figure S4: 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in DMSO-d6, Figure S5: Chemical structures of two conformers of MeBP3, Figure S6: Partial 1H-13C HMQC NMR spectrum (600 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3 (aromatic regions), Figure S7: Partial 1H-13C HMQC NMR spectrum (600 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3 (methoxyl and methylene regions), Figure S8: Partial 1H-13C HMBC NMR spectrum (600 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3 (aromatic regions to aromatic regions), Figure S9: Partial 1H-13C HMBC NMR spectrum (600 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3 (aromatic regions to methoxyl-methylene regions), Figure S10: 2D NOESY (600 MHz, 298 K) spectrum of MeBP3 in CDCl3 with a mixing time of 80 ms, Figure S11: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in CDCl3 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S12: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in CD2Cl2 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S13: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in acetone-d6 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S14: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in acetonitrile-d3 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S15: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in toluene-d8 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S16: Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in xylene-d10 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM), Figure S17: Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) of MeBP3 (H6 of conformer I) at a concentration of 1.0 mM upon addition of 1+. From bottom to top, the concentration of 1+ was 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.5, 5.8, 10.6, 17.2 and 25.4 mM, Figure S18: Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) of MeBP3 (H6 of conformer II) at a concentration of 1.00 mM upon addition of 1+. From bottom to top, the concentration of 1+ was 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.5, 5.8, 10.6, 17.2 and 25.4 mM, Figure S19: The non-linear curve-fitting (NMR titrations) for the complex of 1+ and conformer I and II, K1 = (3.50 ± 0.54) × 103 M1 and K2 = (2.27 ± 0.18) × 103 M1, Table S1: Percentages of MeBP3-I and MeBP3-II in different solvents and temperatures.

Author Contributions

C.L. conceived the project. C.L., Y.W. and L.-P.Y. designed the experiments. Y.W. and X.Z. synthesized the MeBP3. Y.W. and L.-P.Y. performed NMR titration experiment. Y.W., C.L., L.C., J.L., X.J. and J.F. analyzed the data. C.L., Y.W. and L.-P.Y. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21971192, 21801125 and 21772118), and funds provided by Tianjin Normal University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, K.-L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, M.-J. (Eds.) Protein Conformational Dynamics; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kay, E.R.; Leigh, D.A.; Zerbetto, F. Synthetic molecular motors and mechanical machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 72–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Feringa, B.L.; van Delden, R.A.; Koumura, N.; Geertsema, E.M. Chiroptical Molecular Switches. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1789–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Browne, W.R.; Pollard, M.M.; de Lange, B.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B.L. Reversible Three-State Switching of Luminescence: A New Twist to Electro- and Photochromic Behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12412–12413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ivashenko, O.; Logtenberg, H.; Areephong, J.; Coleman, A.C.; Wesenhagen, P.V.; Geertsema, E.M.; Heureux, N.; Feringa, B.L.; Rudolf, P.; Browne, W.R. Remarkable Stability of High Energy Conformers in Self-Assembled Monolayers of a Bistable Electro- and Photoswitchable Overcrowded Alkene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 22965–22975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koumura, N.; Zijlstra, R.W.J.; van Delden, R.A.; Harada, N.; Feringa, B.L. Light-driven monodirectional molecule rotor. Nature 1999, 401, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Stoddart, J.F. Mechanically Interlocked Molecules (MIMs)-Molecular Shuttles, Switches, and Machines (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11094–11125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, M.; Yan, X.; Huang, F.; Niu, Z.; Gibson, H.W. Stimuli-Responsive Host-Guest Systems Based on the Recognition of Cryptands by Organic Guests. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1995–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, H.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, X.; Scherman, O.A. Supramolecular Chemistry at Interfaces: Host-Guest Interactions for Fabricating Multifunctional Biointerfaces. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2106–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, J.; Liu, S. Engineering Responsive Polymer Building Blocks with Host-Guest Molecular Recognition for Functional Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2084–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kremer, C.; Letzen, A. Artificial Allosteric Receptors. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6162–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jia, F.; He, Z.; Yang, L.-P.; Pan, Z.-S.; Yi, M.; Jiang, R.-W.; Jiang, W. Oxatub[4]arene: A smart macrocyclic receptor with multiple interconvertible cavities. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 6731–6738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rebek, J., Jr.; Trend, J.E.; Wattley, R.V.; Chakravorti, S. Allosteric effects in organic chemistry. Site-specific binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4333–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Petitjean, A.; Khoury, R.G.; Kyritsakas, N.; Lehn, J.-M. Dynamic Devices. Shape Switching and Substrate Binding in Ion-Controlled Nanomechanical Molecular Tweezers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6637–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Namor, A.F.D.; Cleverley, R.M.; Zapata-Ormachea, M.L. Thermodynamics of Calixarene Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2495–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, J.S.; Sessler, J.L. Tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)-Annulated Calix[4]pyrroles: Chemically Switchable Systems with Encodable Allosteric Recognition and Logic Gate Functions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2400–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xue, M.; Yang, Y.; Chi, X.; Yan, X.; Huang, F. Development of Pseudorotaxanes and Rotaxanes: From Synthesis to Stimuli-Responsive Motions to Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 7398–7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Knipe, P.C.; Thompson, S.; Hamilton, A.D. Ion-mediated conformational switches. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1630–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Schneider, H.-J. Strain effects determine the performance of artificial allosteric systems: Calixarenes as models. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3433–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tong, S.; Li, J.-T.; Liang, D.-D.; Zhang, Y.-E.; Feng, Q.-Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, M.-X. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis and Switchable Chiroptical Property of Inherently Chiral Macrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14432–14436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Azov, V.A.; Beeby, A.; Cacciarini, M.; Cheetham, A.G.; Diederich, F.; Frei, M.; Gimzewski, J.K.; Gramlich, V.; Hecht, B.; Jaun, B.; et al. Resorcin[4]arene cavitand-based molecular switches. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thondorf, I. Conformations and Stereodynamics of Calixarenes; Asfari, Z., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Holand, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  23. Groenen, L.C.; van Loon, J.-D.; Verboom, W.; Harkema, S.; Casnati, A.; Ungaro, R.; Pochini, A.; Ugozzoll, F.; Reinhoudt, D.N. The 1,2-alternate conformation of calix[4]arenes: A rare conformation? Dynamic 1H NMR studies of flexible tetraalkylated calix[4]arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2385–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Matthews, S.E.; Cecioni, S.; O’Brien, J.E.; MacDonald, C.J.; Hughes, D.L.; Jones, G.A.; Ashworth, S.H.; Vidal, S. Fixing the Conformation of Calix[4]arenes: When Are Three Carbons Not Enough? Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 4436–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gutsche, C.D.; Bauer, L.J. Calixarenes. 13. The conformational properties of calix[4]arenes, calix[6]arenes, calix[8]arenes, and oxacalixarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6052–6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gutsche, C.D.; Bauer, L.J. Calixarenes. 14. The conformational properties of the ethers and esters of the calix[6]arenes and the calix[8]arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6059–6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pochorovski, I.; Diederich, F. Development of Redox-Switchable Resorcin[4]arene Cavitands. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2096–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Neri, P.; Sessler, J.L.; Wang, M.-X. Calixarenes and Beyond; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, D.S.; Sessler, J.L. Calix[4]pyrroles: Versatile molecular containers with ion transport, recognition, and molecular switching functions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 532–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rosa, M.D.; Talotta, C.; Gaeta, C.; Soriente, A.; Neri, P.; Pappalardo, S.; Gattuso, G.; Notti, A.; Parisi, M.F.; Pisagatti, I. Calix[5]arene Through-the-Annulus Threading of Dialkylammonium Guests Weakly Paired to the TFPB Anion. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 5162–5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ogoshi, T.; Akutsu, T.; Yamafuji, D.; Aoki, T.; Yamagishi, T.-A. Solvent- and Achiral-Guest-Triggered Chiral Inversion in a Planar Chiral pseudo[1]Catenane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8111–8115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Fu, L.; Sun, B.; Qian, C.; Wang, R.; Jiang, J.; Lin, C.; Ma, J.; Wang, L. Competitive Selection of Conformation Chirality of Water-Soluble Pillar[5]arene Induced by Amino Acid Derivatives. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 2266–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xiao, C.; Wu, W.; Liang, W.; Zhou, D.; Kanagaraj, K.; Cheng, G.; Su, D.; Zhong, Z.; Chruma, J.J.; Yang, C. Redox-Triggered Chirality Switching and Guest-Capture/Release with a Pillar[6]arene-Based Molecular Universal Joint. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8094–8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Park, J.; Choi, Y.; Lee, S.S.; Jung, J.H. Critical Role of Achiral Guest Molecules in Planar Chirality Inversion of Alanine-Appender Pillar[5]arenes. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, W.-B.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.-L.; Liu, Y.A.; Li, J.-S.; Jiang, B.; Wen, K. A Diaminopillar[5]arene-Based Macrobicyclic Molecules: Synthesis, Characterization and A Lock-Key Story. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 2189–2194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, E.; Ju, H.; Park, I.-H.; Jung, J.H.; Ikeda, M.; Kuwahara, S.; Habata, Y.; Lee, S.S. pseudo[1]Catenane-Type Pillar[5]thiacrown Whose Planar Chiral Inversion is Triggered by Metal Cation and Controlled by Anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 9669–9677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, L.-P.; Zhang, L.; Quan, M.; Ward, J.S.; Ma, Y.-L.; Zhou, H.; Rissanen, K.; Jiang, W. A supramolecular system that strictly follows the binding mechanism of conformational selection. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hong, C.M.; Kaphan, D.M.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. Conformational Selection as the Mechanism of Guest Binding in a Flexible Supramolecular Host. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8013–8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ajami, D.; Liu, L.; Rebek, J., Jr. Soft templates in encapsulation complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Xu, K.; Li, B.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Jia, X.; Zhao, H.; Fang, J.; Li, C. Efficient Separation of cis- and trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Isomers by Adaptive Biphen[3]arene Crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 10281–10284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, H.; Fan, J.; Hu, X.; Ma, J.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Jia, X.; Li, C. Biphen[n]arenes. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dai, L.; Ding, Z.-J.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Jia, X.; Li, C. 2,2′-Biphen[n]arenes (n = 4–8): One-step, high-yield synthesis, and host-guest properties. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 12096–12099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, B.; Wang, B.; Huang, X.; Dai, L.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Jia, X.; Li, C. Terphen[n]arenes and Quaterphen[n]arenes (n = 3–6): One-Pot Synthesis, Self-Assembly into Supramolecular Gels and Iodine Capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3885–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, K.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Yu, C.; Wang, B.; Dong, M.; Zeng, X.; Gou, R.; Cui, L.; Li, C. A Modular Synthetic Strategy for Functional Macrocycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7214–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, C. Biphen[n]arenes: Synthesis and Host–Guest Properties. In Handbook of Macrocyclic Supramolecular Assembly; Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, H.Y., Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. CCDC 1885453 and 1885657 (CH3CN@MeBP3, cis-DCE@MeBP3). These Data Can be Obtained Free of Charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Available online: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 17 December 2018).
  47. Böhmer, V. Calixarenes macrocycles with (almost) unlimited possibilities. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 713–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, C.-F.; Han, Y. Triptycene-Derived Macrocyclic Arenes: From Calixarenes to Helicarenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, M.-X. Nitrogen and Oxygen Bridged Calixaromatics: Synthesis, Structure, Functionalization, and Molecular Recognition. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dondoni, A.; Marra, A. Calixarene and Calixresorcarene Glycosides: Their Synthesis and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4949–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, D.; Martinez, A.; Dutasta, J.-P. Emergence of Hemicryptophanes: From Synthesis to Applications for Recognition, Molecular Machines, and Supramolecular Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 4900–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ogoshi, T.; Yamagishi, T.-A.; Nakamoto, Y. Pillar-Shaped Macrocyclic Hosts Pillar[n]arenes: New Key Players for Supramolecular Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7937–8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xue, M.; Yang, Y.; Chi, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, F.; Pillararenes, A. New Class of Macrocycles for Supramolecular Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1294–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ogoshi, T.; Kanai, S.; Fujinami, S.; Yamagishi, T.-A.; Nakamoto, Y. Para-bridged symmetrical pillar[5]arenes: Their Lewis acid catalyzed synthesis and host-guest property. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5022–5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Jia, F.; Yang, L.-P.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, W. Conformationally adaptive macrocycles with flipping aromatic sidewalls. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4176–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds MeBP3 are available from the authors.
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of the two conformers of MeBP3. (b) Single-crystal structures of two conformers of MeBP3.
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of the two conformers of MeBP3. (b) Single-crystal structures of two conformers of MeBP3.
Molecules 25 05780 g001
Figure 2. (a) Partial 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3; (b) Partial 13C NMR spectrum (125 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3.
Figure 2. (a) Partial 1H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3; (b) Partial 13C NMR spectrum (125 MHz, 25 °C, 100 mM) of MeBP3 in CDCl3.
Molecules 25 05780 g002
Figure 3. (a) Conformational exchanges of MeBP3. (b) Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in different deuterated solvents. (c) Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in toluene-d8 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM).
Figure 3. (a) Conformational exchanges of MeBP3. (b) Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in different deuterated solvents. (c) Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MeBP3 in toluene-d8 (400 MHz, 2.0 mM).
Molecules 25 05780 g003
Figure 4. Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of 1+ (a), host-guest 1:1 mixtures (b), and MeBP3 (c) in CDCl3.
Figure 4. Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 25 °C, 2.0 mM) of 1+ (a), host-guest 1:1 mixtures (b), and MeBP3 (c) in CDCl3.
Molecules 25 05780 g004
Figure 5. (a) Influence of guest-binding and acid/base addition toward conformational exchanges. (b) Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, −60 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in toluene-d8 solution with different conditions.
Figure 5. (a) Influence of guest-binding and acid/base addition toward conformational exchanges. (b) Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, −60 °C, 2.0 mM) of MeBP3 in toluene-d8 solution with different conditions.
Molecules 25 05780 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Yang, L.-P.; Zhao, X.; Cui, L.; Li, J.; Jia, X.; Fang, J.; Li, C. Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Conformational Exchanges of Biphen[3]arene Macrocycle. Molecules 2020, 25, 5780. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245780

AMA Style

Wang Y, Yang L-P, Zhao X, Cui L, Li J, Jia X, Fang J, Li C. Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Conformational Exchanges of Biphen[3]arene Macrocycle. Molecules. 2020; 25(24):5780. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245780

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yiliang, Liu-Pan Yang, Xiang Zhao, Lei Cui, Jian Li, Xueshun Jia, Jianhui Fang, and Chunju Li. 2020. "Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Conformational Exchanges of Biphen[3]arene Macrocycle" Molecules 25, no. 24: 5780. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245780

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop