Next Article in Journal
Flame Retardancy of Wood Fiber Materials Using Phosphorus-Modified Wheat Starch
Previous Article in Journal
Crystallographic and NMR Investigation of Ergometrine and Methylergometrine, Two Alkaloids from Claviceps Purpurea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Solubility and Bioavailability Enhancement of Oridonin: A Review

College of pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(2), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020332
Submission received: 10 November 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 9 January 2020 / Published: 14 January 2020

Abstract

:
Oridonin (ORI), an ent-kaurene tetracyclic diterpenoid compound, is isolated from Chinese herb Rabdosia rubescens with various biological and pharmacological activities including anti-tumor, anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory effects. However, the clinical application of ORI is limited due to its low solubility and poor bioavailability. In order to overcome these shortcomings, many strategies have been explored such as structural modification, new dosage form, etc. This review provides a detailed discussion on the research progress to increase the solubility and bioavailability of ORI.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

“Donglingcao” is the dry aerial part of Labtea Rabdosia rubescens (Hemsl.) Hara. The 2015 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia records its efficacy of clearing away heat and detoxifying, promoting blood circulation and relieving pain. It is commonly used in the treatment of acute and chronic pharyngitis, bronchitis, tonsillitis and insect bites [1,2]. The main chemical component is the diterpenoid compound, and the ent-kaurene tetracyclic diterpenoid compound represented by Oridonin (ORI, C20H28O6, Figure 1) exhibits strong antitumor activity [3,4]. ORI also has anti-bacterial [5], anti-inflammation [6], anti-oxidation [7], depressurization [8], anti-inflammation [9,10,11], immune-modulating [12] and analgesia [13] effects (Table 1). In particular, ORI demonstrates a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation of more than 20 human cancer cell lines, such as common esophageal cancer [14], lung cancer [15], liver cancer [16], prostate cancer [17], breast cancer [18], and colorectal cancer [19], which is attributed to its specific molecular structure. The α-methylene cyclopentanone (enone) on the D-ring is the essential structure of the anti-cancer activity, which can be impaired by ring splitting or methylene saturation [20]. Besides, the hydrogen bond between the 6-hydroxy group and the 15-carbonyl group increases the electrophilicity of C(17), which further improves the affinity to electrophilic enzymes in tumor cells. The anti-cancer activity can be enhanced by the esterification of 14-hydroxyl group whose nucleophilic property is amplified by the parallel 7-hydroxyl group; the antitumor activity decreases without the 7-hydroxyl group [21].
Despite the wide spectra of pharmacological activities, the application of ORI is limited due to its hydrophobicity. It has a solubility of 0.75 mg/mL and the log p = 1.66, leading to disappointing bioavailability [22]. Moreover, the rapid plasma clearance of ORI, the first-pass effect after oral administration, and the lack of proper dosage forms for intravenous injection hinder pharmacodynamics research and clinical development of ORI [23]. According to a previous report, when orally administered to rats (20, 40 and 80 mg/kg), the absolute bioavailability of ORI is 4.32%, 4.58% and 10.80% in a dose-dependent manner [24]. At present, the clinical use of Rabdosia rubescens is limited to tablet and drop pills forms; it can detoxify and relief pain [25] or be combined with other chemical drugs to enhance the anti-cancer effect [26].
To alleviate the deficiency of ORI applications, much effort has been made on the improvement of the solubility and bioavailability of ORI. Among the various strategies, structural modification shows remarkable efficacy in boosting solubility and biological activity [11], and the development of new technologies as well as dosage forms inspires the regulation of ORI delivery via pharmaceutics method [27]. These achievements lay a stepping stone and disclose the great potential future applications of ORI. In this review, we summarize the strategies to improve the solubility and bioavailability of ORI by structural modifications and build-up of drug delivery systems over recent years.

2. Strategies for Structural Modification

Structural modification has been broadly processed to optimize the solubility and membrane permeability of ORI, which contributes to enhanced bioavailability. Generally, the main modification sites include the A-, B-, and D-ring and the corresponding hydroxyl or methylene groups (Figure 1) [28,29]. Here, several crucial modification strategies will be introduced.

2.1. Thiazolation of ORI

Modification of the thiazole ring has been certified effective in improving solubility and biological activity [30]. After introducing the thiazole ring into the C(1) and C(2) on A-ring, this structure could interact with the acid and forms salt so as to improve the water solubility with the nitrogen atoms bound to the core scaffold of the ORI; meanwhile, a biologically active enone moiety was kept intact (Figure 2). It has been reported that the solubility of hydrochloride of compound 8b, 8h was 62 and 32 times that of bulk ORI (1.29 mg/mL) respectively. In addition, compounds 8a8e and 8g, 8h showed a significant anti-proliferation effect on breast, pancreatic and prostate cancer cells with IC50 (50% inhibiting concentration) within the range 0.1–1 μmol/L, as well as the multidrug resistance cells ER(+) MCF-7 [31]. Claire et al. used the alamar Blue Assay to measure the proliferation activity of human and rat hepatic stellate cell (HSC) lines, and in vitro studies showed that compound 8h had a significant inhibitory effect on hepatic fibrosis via suppression of the NF-κB pathway, which could significantly inhibit the proliferation of LX-2 and HSC-T6 cells and induce their apoptosis [32].

2.2. Glycosylation of ORI

Glycosylation is regarded as an ideal modification strategy for ORI. For one thing, the derivatives of saccharides regulate various biological activities and indicate precious value in medical treatment. Secondly, glycosylation improves solubility and works as the ligand for targeted delivery in certain conditions [33]. After protecting hydroxyl groups at C(1), C(7) and C(14), ORI reacted with α-d-Glucopyranosyl bromide tetrabenzoate via a Koenigs–Knorr reaction and the typical glycosylation of ORI (ORI-6-O-β-d-glucopyranoside) was synthesized after deprotection (Figure 3) [34]. Generally, glucose transporter 1 is overexpressed in certain tumor cells [35], which require more glucose to maintain growth and proliferation than normal cells. It is expected that the glycosylation of ORI might increase its cancer cellular uptake, so further activity studies are worthwhile.

2.3. PEGylation and Esterification of ORI

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a widely used polymer in drug conjugation due to its unique physicochemical properties including good solubility, being degradable, low cost, good biocompatibility, steric repulsion [36]. With PEGylation, the hydrophilicity of the drugs can be effectively enhanced and the circulation time of drugs are prolonged by avoiding reticuloendothelial system (RES) clearance [37]. PEGylating the carbonylated ORI by various MeO-PEG-NH2 conjugations at the C(14) position (PEG-SA-ORI, Figure 4, 14), the drug loading efficiency and in vitro release profiles could be adjusted by altering the molecular weight (Mw) of PEG chains. As a result, the loaded-ORI content and solubility increased as Mw decreased. Compared with the bulk ORI, the solubility of the conjugates increased by 4.68–99.2 times, and the pharmacokinetics study showed that the area under [the plasma concentration time) curve (AUC) of the preferred PEG20kDa-SA-ORI was about 2.1-times higher, suggesting that PEGylation was a promising approach to achieve better bioavailability of ORI [38].
Apart from PEGylation, some other esterification methods were performed to modulate ORI properties. For instance, novel 1-O- and 14-O-ORI (Figure 4, 15a15e,16a16e) derivatives were synthesized by introducing water-soluble chains through the attachment of ester groups, and the solubility of most compounds was improved (>50 mg/mL). The cytotoxicity of compound 15a, 16e was almost 40-times that of ORI in BEL-7402 cells, and the in vivo H22 or B16 tumor weight was up to 44.3% smaller than that of ORI in mice [39].

2.4. Amino Acid Modification of ORI

Amino acid is an important nutrient for metabolism in humans [40]. With both a basic amino group and an acidic carboxyl group, amino acid modification can be performed flexibly to fit the pH environment, improve the solubility or cell permeability, increase the targeting capability, or achieve sustained release profiles with proper dosage forms [41]. A series of 14-O-derivatives were synthesized with condensed anhydrides at 14-hydroxyl group followed by esterification with amino acid (Figure 5, 17a17d, 18a18f). It was found that the cell uptake of the derivative increased. Cytotoxicity could be amplified by controlling the length and decoration of the lipophilic side chain: The longest, 17d, showed the strongest toxicity, and the cytotoxicity of compounds 18e and 17c of the aryl substituent was seven-times higher than that of the bulk ORI in the BGC-7901 cell. The in vivo tumor inhibition rate of 17c was 16.9% higher than that of ORI and was comparable to that of cyclophosphamide (59.6% vs. 59.1%), despite the mechanism not being clear [42].
There are some other forms of ORI, like prodrugs, which improve their solubility and pharmacokinetic properties for long-term effects [43]. Sun et al. invented a method to prepare an aqueous soluble prodrug of ORI from amino acids [44], l-alanine-(14-oridonin) ester trifluoroacetate (HAO472) (Figure 5, 19), which had good chemical stability and could be better used in clinical treatments with low toxicity and residue of crystallization solvent. HAO472 has advanced into Phase I human clinical trials for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in China by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co. Ltd.

2.5. Aziridination of ORI

Covalent drugs are the only class of drugs that can completely shut down and silence the protein activity that causes disease. In recent years, with the advent of targeted covalent inhibitors, the notion of exploring new generations of covalent drugs has resurged. Covalent drugs can react directly with targets to form covalent bonds, resulting in corresponding biological activity [45]. It can achieve its unique therapeutic advantages with strong and long-lasting effects and high ligand efficiency [45,46]. The enone system in the D-ring of natural covalent drug ORI, a classic covalent warhead, is identified as a Michael-acceptor necessary for biological activity, which reacts with various thiol groups and residues of small molecules (e.g., GSH) and target proteins (e.g., thioredoxin reductase) to afford irreversible inhibition, leading to potential non-targeting effects and clinical safety issues [47]. Removal of the enone fragment could cause the loss of ORI activity [19].
In order to reduce the toxicity of ORI and increase its safety, Ding et al. utilized a mild and efficient Rh2(esp)2-catalyzed reaction to regio- and stereo-pecifically constructed new aziridinated oridonin analogues, replacing the overly reactive enone at the same site on D‑ring [48]. In addition, aziridines are milder in chemical reactions and have better water solubility. The antiproliferative effect of ORI D‑ring aziridinated analogue (YD0514) (Figure 5, 20) on the highly aggressive triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB231 was significantly enhanced with an IC50 value of 8.32 μM, compared with ORI (IC50 value of 29.4 μM), and it was less toxic to normal breast epithelial cells and induced the apoptosis of breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner [48]. In all, the various modification strategies provide an inspiring starting point to improve the application potential of ORI.

3. Strategizes for Pharmaceutical Formulations

Besides the properties of the drug itself, the full extent of drug activity is largely determined by the dosage form, which influences the absorption, release profile, stability, in-site accumulation, etc. In recent years, flourishing technologies like microparticles, solid dispersions, inclusions [49], liposomes and nanotechnology [50] have laid a solid foundation for the development of new dosage forms and the improvement of the quality of formulations. With appropriate delivery systems, it is possible to improve solubility, change the in vivo process, and enhance the bioavailability of ORI.

3.1. Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes

Cyclodextrin is a cyclic oligosaccharide compound composed of a glycoside-bound glucose unit. Its stereo configuration is a cylindrical structure with the core for the drug embedded in it to form an inclusion complex. Both ends and the outside surface of the cyclodextrin are hydrophilic, while the inner space is hydrophobic [51]. With 1H-NMR spectroscopy and two-dimensional rotating frame overhauser effect spectroscopy, it was confirmed that the A ring of ORI derivatives was anchored into the hydrophobic cavity from the wider edge of β-CD, while the rest was exposed outside of the cavity by preparing three ORI derivatives of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) inclusion compounds [52].
Due to this special structure, cyclodextrin is often used as a carrier in pharmaceutics to increase drug solubility and stability, solidify liquid drugs, and reduce irritation, etc. [53]. An ORI-loaded inclusion complex prepared using 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) by freeze-drying method, and the solubility of ORI-HP-β-CD inclusion was 27-times that of ORI (55.45 mM vs. 2.062 mM). In vivo tissue distribution studies showed a potential treatment for lung-targeting: The inclusion distribution increased in the lung while it decreased in the heart, spleen, and kidney compared with free ORI, which might be due to the its specific binding to substances in the lung [54].

3.2. Microparticles

The microparticle drug delivery system has been a research hotspot on pharmaceutical preparations in recent years. With encapsulation in microparticles, the solubility and bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs can be significantly enhanced. In addition, the dispersion system of particles in different sizes usually shows unique biodistribution, indicating its potential application in targeted delivery [55].
The large pore structure and small aerodynamic diameter of the polylactic acid-glycolic acid (PLGA) large porous microparticle (LPMP) prevented the ORI from phagocytosis of alveolar macrophages. The ORI-loaded porous PLGA microspheres prepared with electrospraying had high lung deposition after pulmonary administration; thus, this could be used as a dry powder inhaler for local treatment of lung cancer by inhibiting blood vessel generation and enhancing tumor apoptosis [27]. At present, the anti-cancer effect of some LPMPs is comparable to first-line clinical anti-cancer drugs, and regarded as an ideal delivery system for the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer [56].
Another new photosensitive ORI-loaded microsphere was developed by introducing porphyrin ring to the chitosan (CS) as a side group. ORI was released from CS microspheres in sustained profiles when exposed to light, with the fatality rate of 82.74% on MCF-7 cells at 100 μmol/mL, significantly higher than that in the dark (68.50%) [57].
Folate receptors (FR) are overexpressed on the surface of many cancer cells with high affinity to folic acid. With surface-coated folic acid-polyvinyl alcohol ester on liposome microbubbles, the targeting ultrasonic reaction delivery system F-LMB-ORI was further developed, where ORI released from the microbubbles flowing through the targeted area under high-intensity and led to higher ORI absorption. The in vitro inhibition rate of HepG2 cells was as high as 94.0%. The tumor inhibition rate was 89.4% in mice at a dose of 1.5 × 10−2 g/kg/day, which was significantly higher than that of the uncoated group (71.5%) [58].

3.3. Nanocrystals

Nanosuspension is a submicron colloidal dispersion without any carrier tools, which consists of drug crystal particles and a stabilizer, with up to 100% encapsulation efficiency (EE) [59]. Due to its small particle size, large specific surface area and high drug loading (DL), nanosuspension can efficiently deliver drugs and obtain higher intracellular concentrations, thus achieving greater efficacy [60]. Owing to the high melting point of crystal form, nanosuspension is favored for sustained release with low toxicity and high safety [61], and can be further manufactured into various drug delivery systems according to clinical requirements [62,63].
The preparation methods of nanosuspension mainly include top-down and bottom-up, or the combination of the two. The working principle of top-down preparation is to mechanically shear the drug crystal into nanometer-sized drug particles, of which media milling and high-pressure homogenization (HPH) are the most representative technologies [64,65]. Bottom-up preparation is based on the precipitation process of drug particles from their supersaturated solution, including antisolvent precipitation method, supercritical fluid precipitation and solvent removal precipitation method. Particularly, HPH is most widely used in nanosuspension technology development [66]. In recent years, the carrier-free nanosuspensions has been increasingly utilized to solve the problem of poor solubility and low bioavailability of ORI.
An ORI nanosuspension (ORI-N) prepared by HPH method has good stability when the ratio of drug to stabilizer is 1:5. In this case, ORI-N was uniformly dispersed in terms of solubility and the dissolution rate improved [67]. Altering the pressure and cycle numbers affected the ORI-N particle sizes obviously: Nanosuspension A was 103.3 ± 1.5 nm, while B was 897.2 ± 14.2 nm. It was found that the dissolution was largely affected by particle size: The accumulative dissolution of A in 10 min reached 99.9%, significantly higher than that of B (75.2% in 30 min), and A demonstrated higher heart and kidney accumulation compared with ORI solution. The plasma clearance rate of B was delayed, AUC was about twice that of the ORI solution and the MRI extended from 1.89 h to 11.78 h. The uptake ratio in the liver and spleen were 40.12% and 30.22%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of nanosuspension A and ORI solution, providing a strong basis for optimizing the particle size for intravenous administration [68].
ORI-N has been widely investigated in both in vitro and in vivo tumor therapeutics. It has been reported that the inhibition effect of ORI-N on the K562 cells and the tumor volume of S−180 tumor-bearing mice was significantly higher than that of free ORI [69]. A similar effect was observed in PC−3 cells with ORI-N. [70]. Another study showed that ORI-N effectively induced the apoptosis of SMMC−7721 cells in the G2/M phase with cytotoxicity 5.88-times that of the ORI solution. In vivo studies showed that the repression of tumor was observed from the ninth day after ORI-N administration (20 mg/mL) [71]. This mechanism of cell cycle disruption has also been utilized in apoptosis of MCF-7 cells. With ORI-N administration, downregulation of Bcl-2 and the high expression of Bax were more significant compared with free ORI in time- and dose-dependent, which indicated induced apoptosis to a larger degree [72]. A greater reduction of the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax and activation of caspase-3 could also be realized with ORI-N in human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell line, as well as stronger cytotoxicity [73].
It is a novel trend to combine nanosuspension with cyclodextrin complexation technologies. The surfactant in the nanosuspension can stabilize the drug crystals, compensating for the shortcomings of drug outflow when using cyclodextrin inclusion complexes (CICs) alone. Meanwhile, the HP-β-CD and poloxamer enhance and increase the dissolution and the permeability of the drug in the intestine [74,75]. The bioavailability of ORI-loaded nanosuspension formulation of cyclodextrin inclusion complex prepared by solvent evaporation and wet media milling method soared to 213.99%. The surfactant poloxamer and CICs enhanced the apparent solubility of ORI by 11.2 times (from 0.524 mg/mL to 5.87 mg/mL) [76]. Table 2 lists these studies about ORI nanosuspension.

3.4. Nanoparticles

3.4.1. Polymer Nanoparticles

Polymer nanoparticles are favored due to the chemical modification diversity, probable long-term circulation and targeting delivery in the body [77]. At present, various polymers have been investigated to build up ORI delivery systems. For instance, Poly (D, l-lactic acid) (PLA) is one of the common polymers with good biocompatibility, degradability and low toxicity. ORI-loaded PLA nanoparticles (ORI-PLA-NP) were prepared by a modified spontaneous emulsion solvent diffusion method, which increased the solubility of ORI and prolonged the blood circulation. High concentrations of ORI were observed in the liver, lung and spleen, but less so in the heart and kidney. However, ORI-PLA-NP has the disadvantage of small DL and can still be improved [78].
Hydrophilic poly-ethylene oxide (PEO) prevented NPs from clearance by the RES, prolonged the systemic circulation, and enhanced drug accumulation in tumor cells [79]. Feng et al. prepared an ORI-loaded poly (ε-caprolactam) poly (ethylene oxide) poly (ε-caprolactam) (PCL-PEO-PCL) copolymer nanoparticles (ORI-PCL-PEO-PCL-NPs) by interfacial deposition method. The tumor volume and weight were significantly smaller compared with the blank group and had a survival rate of 169.6% [80]. Another study successfully determined the pharmacokinetic parameters of ORI-PCL-PEO-PCL-NP in rabbit plasma by HPLC method, where the apparent volume of distribution was approximately twice that of the ORI solution [81].
Compared with passive targeting, active targeting utilizes the ligand-modified carrier as a “missile” to deliver the drug to the target sites and demonstrates better in-site drug accumulation and less toxicity. Modified with peptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD), ORI-PLA-RGD-NPs was prepared and achieved lower burst release and engulfment of phagocytic cells with much higher ORI accumulation in the tumor, liver and spleen. The pharmacodynamics study showed that the tumor volume and weight of ORI-PLA-RGD-NPs group were about half that of the ORI-PLA-NPs group, and the average survival of H22 tumor-bearing mice was about 14 days longer [82].
The asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R) is overexpressed on the surface of hepatoma cells, on which the membrane-bound active site can specifically bind to CS with reactive functional groups, high charge and biodegradability [83]. Based on this property, galactosylated chitosan (GC) was synthesized and coated on ORI-loaded nanoparticles (ORI-GC-NP) to cure hepatocellular carcinoma. In vitro drug release exhibited pH-dependence due to the CS-NH2 protonation in the acidic environment, resulting in the infiltration and release of ORI-GC-NP in acidic cancer cell environments. ORI-GC-NP mainly aggregated in the liver, and the AUC value of ORI-GC-NP in the liver was 6.4-times higher than the ORI solution, which confirmed its significant liver-targeting effect and suggesting it may be a promising ORI delivery system [84].
Another example is ORI-loaded galactosylated bovine serum albumin nanoparticle (ORI-GB-NP). The lactobionic acid was coupled to bovine serum albumin (BSA) by amidation reaction to synthesize GB. This was followed by the introduction of galactosamine on the free aldehyde groups for end-blocking. Then, the compound was prepared into nanodrugs by the desolvation technique [85]. ORI-GB-NP showed specific recognition and binding to ASGP-R, prolonged blood circulation and less distribution in heart, lung and kidney compared with ORI-BSA-NP, and the plasma concentration was more than twice that of the ORI solution [86].
Wang et al. synthesized galactosylated polymer nanoparticles modified by a double-ended D-α‑Tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) (ORI-Gal-PT-NPs) (Figure 6) [87]. TPGS could inhibit the expression of efflux pump P-glycoprotein and synergistically induce apoptosis with ORI [88,89]. ORI-loaded NPs accumulated in the tumor tissue through the enhanced permeability and retention effect. The galactose-specific receptor-mediated endocytosis increased the absorption of ORI-Gal-PT-NPs on HepG2 cells, and the apoptosis rate increased by 4−5.6% compared with the ORI solution [87]. Table 3 shows all the ORI polymer nanoparticles.

3.4.2. Lipid Nanoparticles

Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), a new type of nanoparticle delivery system [90], emerged in the 1990s, bringing the advantages of high physical stability, low drug leakage, good sustained release profile and high bioavailability (Figure 7a) [91]. SLNs can also reduce the potential toxicity of drugs using biocompatible and high melting point lipids [92]. Therefore, SLNs are regarded as a promising carrier for drug delivery.
Zhang et al. used stearic acid, soya bean lecithin and pluronic F68 as the carrier materials to prepare the ORI-loaded SLNs. ORI was dispersed in SLNs in amorphous form with the EE over 40% [93]. It was reported that ORI-SLNs induced cell cycle arrest and the apoptosis of breast cancer cells MCF-7 more significantly than free ORI (p < 0.01), and the relative uptake rates (Re) in liver and spleen reached 41.25% and 31.44%, indicating that SLNs are an effective carrier for enhancing the anti-cancer activity of ORI [94].

Nanostructured Lipid Carriers

The nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) is a second-generation lipid nanoparticle which combines the advantages of nanoparticles and liposomes similar to SLCs [95]. Generally, NLCs are in a porous matrix structure composed of liquid lipids, solid lipids and surfactants [96]. The defects of the nanoparticle lattice reduce the amount of drug discharged from the carrier material and are beneficial to the sustained release [97]. In addition, as the solubility in the liquid lipid is larger than the solid lipid, it may be a reasonable strategy to improve the DL by controlling the ratio of liquid lipids [98,99]. After oral administration of NLCs, lipids are digested in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, increasing the residence time and absorption of the oral anti-cancer drugs [100]. Safety is regarded as one of the most important properties of NLCs, as its low glass transition temperature, low tendency for unpredictable gelation, low toxicity to normal tissues and reduced GI irritation attest [101,102].
With monostearate used as solid lipid and octanoic acid/capric triglycerides (CT) as liquid lipid, Dai et al. prepared a novel ORI drug, using nanostructured lipid as the carrier, with good physical stability. X-ray diffraction results showed the crystal form of this lipid nanoparticle. Despite the average particle size decreasing favorably to 200 nm, the core space of the nanoparticle was expanded to accommodate drug molecules, leading to higher EE (74.25%) and DL (3.55%) than NLCs without CT (40.52% and 1.97%, respectively) [103]. It was reported that the distribution of ORI-loaded NLCs in the liver was 8.6-times that of the ORI solution after intravenous administration at a dose of 25 mg/kg in Kunming germline mice [104]. To improve the pharmacokinetics behaviors of ORI-loaded NLCs, PEG was coated on the surface for long-circulation [105]. The MRT of ORI-PEG-NLCs was extended to 6.209 h, compared with 3.004 h of ORI-NLCs, with AUC increasing by 1.3 times.
Another way to optimize the absorption of ORI is active-targeting companied with avoiding hydrolysis of NLCs by digestive enzymes. Zhou et al. reported biotin-decorated ORI-loaded NLCs (Bio-ORI-NLCs), which increased oral relative bioavailability by 171.01% and effective intestinal permeability by three times via the interaction of biotin and intestinal receptors. Besides, the lipids could be reconstituted into new drug carriers (e.g., micelles) under digestion with GI lipase, by which the ORI was effectively protected from degradation before absorption. However, an in vitro study showed that ORI was strongly metabolized by liver enzymes in the first-pass metabolism (phase II), suggesting this system still requires further improvement for oral administration of ORI [106].
Recently, lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LPNs) attracted research interest by unitizing the advantages such as controlling drug release, avoiding drug degradation or leakage and good targeting. With specific modifications, this functional system demonstrated favorable potential for oral ORI administration. For example, surface modification of ORI-load LPNs used the specific adhesion property of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which increased the biofilm adhesion of drugs and reduced the clearance of LPNs in the GI tract [107]. By interacting with mucin, WGA-LPNs overcame mucosal barriers, and improved Re in the Caco−2 model. An in vivo study showed that the bioavailability of WGA-LPNs and LPNs increased 9.09 times and 1.96 times compared with ORI suspension, respectively [108].

3.5. Liposomes

Liposomes are microcapsules (Figure 7b) that can encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs [109]. Commonly designed for targeted delivery or lymphatic orientation, liposomes can be administered in various routes, such as intravenous injection [110], oral administration [111], intraocular administration [112], pulmonary administration [113] and external use (including skin administration) [114] according to clinical needs. With the drug encapsulated in the lipid-like bilayer, the stability of the drug is enhanced by minimizing excretion and metabolism in a sustained release manner, which conduces to reduce the toxicity of the drug [115].
The PEG modification of the liposome surface can achieve extended residence time and long circulation by increasing the hydrophilicity of the microparticle surfaces and introducing steric hindrance to prevent opsonization and avoid being swallowed by phagocytes, known as the “stealth effect” [116,117]. This approach utilized the steric repulsion of PEG2000-DSPE to reduce the ORI-loaded liposomes uptake by RES and prolong blood circulation. Blood distribution was found to be significantly higher than in the heart after intravenous injection of ORI stealth liposomes to tumor-bearing mice. The MRT in the blood was extended to 35.92 h and the T1/2 to 24.24 h, compared with the ORI solution (MRT = 0.93 h, T1/2 = 24.89 h). The tumor inhibition rate of ORI stealth liposomes group was 85.4% at the tenth day, which was significantly higher than that of the ORI solution (63.7%) [118]. A similar result was observed in the report of Sun et al., where the lyophilized ORI-loaded PEGylated liposomes (ORI-PL) showed sustained release for three days, and anti-tumor activity was improved along with reduced ORI toxicity [119].
ORI-loaded FR-targeted liposomes (F-L-ORI) were obtained by conjugating folate to PEG2000-DSPE. The in vitro release showed burst and sustained two-phase with 95.1% accumulative release in 96 h. With a higher cell binding rate of F-L-ORI to HepG2, the IC50 value was reduced by 68% when compared with unconjugated L-ORI. The weight gain and HepG2 tumor volume reduction of the FL-ORI group were observed in mice with an inhibitory rate of 85.6% at the tenth day, which was significantly higher than the L-ORI (66.8%) and free ORI (40.8%) [120].
Guo et al. prepared a galactose-modified ORI-loaded liposome (NOH-ORI-LP) by the conjugation of N-octadecyl-4-((d-galactopyranosyl) oxy)-2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy hexanamide (NOH) [121], which could be specifically recognized by ASGP-R. When the molar ratio of drug to lipid was 0.35, the EE of NOH-ORI-LP was improved to 94.1%. The pharmacokinetic behavior of NOH-ORI-LP fit the two-compartment model, exhibiting a relatively high plasma concentration for a long time compared with ORI solution. The Re of NOH-ORI-LP in the liver was as high as 4.28, indicating the liver-targeting ability of NOH-ORI-LP [122]. Table 4 summarized the research efforts have been devoted to ORI-loaded liposomes over the years.

3.6. Micelles

A micelle is a kind of self-assembled nanoparticle with a hydrophobic core and hydrophilic shell structure formed by amphiphilic molecular organization (Figure 8) [123,124]. The small size of the micelle enable it to avoid phagocytosis by the RES or absorption of tissues such as the liver and spleen, which improves the blood circulation of the drug in the blood and is beneficial for targeted delivery to specific tissues [125,126]. In addition, the materials used to prepare the copolymer micelles are generally degradable and can be eliminated by metabolism of the body to reduce allergic reactions [127].
There has been some research focusing on the ORI-M. Zhang et al. designed a block copolymer polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether polylactic acid (PEDLA) ORI-M, which showed a certain sustained release effect, while the EE and DL were not satisfactory [128]. The ORI-loaded monomethoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-poly(-caprolactone) (MPEG-PCL) micelles were readily resolved after freeze-drying and showed better transdermal properties than ORI solutions. MTT analysis results indicated that ORI-MPEG-PCL micelles significantly reduced the activity of mouse Lewis lung cancer LL2 cells [129]. Likewise, the IC50 value of ORI-loaded cholesterol formyl-chitosan (CF-CS) copolymer nano-micelles was about three times lower than copolymer nano-micelles and was about three times lower than that of the ORI solution on Hela cancer cells [130].
Consisting of multiple types of polymers, mixed micelles have a higher stability than singular ones, with a more uniform particle size distribution and core shell structure [131], which is favored for dissolution, sustained release and efficacy of drugs while inhibiting outflow [132,133]. Ke et al. prepared ORI-loaded nano-mixed micelles with Soluplus (SOL) and Pluronic P105 (P105). SOL with a lower critical micelle concentration combined with P105 to maximize the stability of the short length of poly (propylene oxide) chain of P105. The particle size was small (137.2 ± 1.65 nm) and the DL was 15.91%. It was confirmed that ORI-M remained stable after being diluted 200 times in artificial GI fluid [134]. Another study conjugated d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate TPGS and PLGA with disulfide bonds (TPGS-S-S-PLGA), and mixed the polymer with APDTKTQ-modified F68 to prepare an ORI-loaded mixed micelles, which could be specifically targeted to the receptor of advanced glycation end-products (RAGE). The APDTKTQ-RAGE affinity enhanced the cellular endocytosis of TSP-FP. The redox sensitivity of the S–S bond promoted the lysis of the carrier and the release of ORI by responding to the high concentration of intracellular glutathione, which further induced early apoptosis (78.2% with TSP-FP vs. 51.2% with free ORI) on BEL-7402 cells [135].

3.7. Combination of Formulations

Currently, the new materials have become an indispensable component of biomedical materials and drug controlled release systems [136]. Compared with conventional drug carriers, these materials are intelligent, environmentally friendly, versatile, stable, and usually reveal more preferable biocompatibility and larger DL, suggesting a new direction of formulations development when combined with conventional materials [137].
As an organic system, cubosomes provide a new method for building up new drug delivery systems. Shi et al. prepared ORI cubosomes with the phytantriol-propylene glycol-poloxamer 407-water system, which increased the solubility of ORI 5.2-fold with a unique internal three-dimensional double channel and lipid bilayer structure, which could maintain release for 24 h [138].
Inorganic systems, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), gold nanocages (AuNCs) and selenium nanoparticles (Se NPs), have unique advantages as the drug vehicle, for example, a high Young modulus and large surface area. Embedded ORI in carbonyl-functionalized multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs-COOH) by π-π stacking can reach a drug-loading of 82.6%. Through direct ingestion by the cell membrane, MWCNTs-ORI demonstrated an inhibition rate of 86.4% on HepG2 cells, which was significantly higher than the 39.2% of ORI-F [139].
Graphene oxide (GO) has good solubility and can be chemically modified for poorly soluble drug delivery due to its a large number of oxygen-containing reactive groups such as carboxyl groups, hydroxyl groups and epoxy groups [140]. Xu et al. attached a 6-arm PEG to GO and prepared GO-PEG ORI nanocarriers by loading ORI onto GO-PEG by the physical blending method. The DL ratio was as high as 105%, and the in vitro cytotoxicity results showed that the cell viability of MCF-7 cells treated with GO-PEG ORI for 48 h was 24% lower than that of ORI at a dose of 20 μmol/L [141]. Recently, Chai et al. prepared a universal nanoscale drug delivery system (GO-PEG10K−6arm) for extensive hydrophobic drugs with a particle size of about 200 nm, which has an EPR effect on tumor tissue to achieve passive targeting. The nanocomplexes (ORI@GO-PEG10K−6arm) obtained by combining ORI with PEG10k−6arm have good thermostability and the DL is 10%. The cytotoxicity to cancer cells CAL 27, MG 63, HepG2 is approximately 10-times that of free ORI [142].
Composed of ions and terephthalic acid, Carboxylic acid iron MOFs overcome the shortcomings of low loading and poor stability of organic carriers, as well as the degradation difficulty of inorganic carriers. With adjustable pore size, good biocompatibility and a surface for modification, MOFs have been widely used as excellent nanocarriers in biomedical research [143]. For instance, Leng et al. prepared ORI@MIL-53 (Fe) with an MOF material, Materials of Institut Lavoisiser (MIL)-53 (Fe). The DL was up to 56.25 wt% with an in vitro release that lasted for more than seven days, and drug release in an alkaline environment was slower due to the pore size of MIL-53 (Fe). The cytotoxicity study showed that the anticancer rate of ORI@MIL-53(Fe) was 90.62% on HepG2 cells, suggesting its potential for anti-cancer applications [144]. Chen et al. prepared ORI@MOF-5 based on the carrier of nano-MOF-5. It demonstrated a significant cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells (IC50 = 22.99 μg/mL) and sustained release was not affected by pH [145]. As a result, MOFs have the potential to be a drug carrier material.
Targeted delivery of ORI can be achieved with inorganic carriers when modified by the ligand. Qiu et.al. constructed an ORI-loaded multifunctional theoranostic nanoplatform (ORI-GPC1-NPs) composed of hyaluronic acid (HA)-modified AuNCs, anti-Glypican-1 antibody, ORI, gadolinium (Gd), and Cy7 probe (Figure 9a). The hollow cage inside AuNCs increased the DL. HA, with high stability and good biocompatibility, worked as an ideal surface-coating of AuNCs for anti-GPC1 antibody conjugation, which effectively enhanced targeting to GCP1 overexpression pancreatic cancer cells and antitumor activity at lower ORI concentrations. The NIRF and MRI imaging of loaded Cy7 probes could be utilized for an early diagnosis and in vivo biodistribution study. This versatile nano-platform is expected to become a potential approach for precise theoranostics [146].
Se NPs deliver drugs to cancer cells by conjunction with targeting biomolecules. GE11 is a highly efficient EGFR-targeting peptide. With GE11 conjugated to the Se NPs on the CS coating, the GE11-ORI-Se NP was designed (Figure 9b) for treatment of esophageal laryngeal carcinoma (ESCC). After specific endocytosis into the KYSE-150 cells, the ORI was released in the acidic lysosomes due to the pH-dependent characteristics of CS. It was observed that the expression of CD31, which was related to the angiogenesis of ESCC, was downregulated along with the activation of immune system [147]. Another example is ORI@ GE11-GO, of which GE11 peptide were conjugated with GO. The study showed that ORI@ GE11-GO effectively induced apoptosis of esophageal cancer cells (KYSE-30 and EC109 cells) by activating mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis [148].

3.8. Others

In addition to the dosages mentioned above, techniques such as solid dispersions, nanogels and self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) have also been investigated in the ORI delivery system field. Li et al. prepared an ORI solid dispersion using CO2 as the anti-solvent and a hydrophilic polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone K17 (PVP K17) as the drug carrier by the gas anti-solvent technique, obtaining smaller particles without organic solvents in one-step granulation. Pharmacokinetic results showed that the bioavailability and of the ORI solid dispersion increased by 26.4 times compared with the physical mixture of ORI and PVP K17 [149]. An ORI-loaded nanogel was explored with copolymers, chitosan-graft-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (CS-g-PNIPAm), whose in vitro release showed pH-dependent profiles and high anti-cancer activity was achieved at pH = 6.5 [150]. Following modifications of nanogels with galactose, ORI uptake was enhanced in HepG2 cells via galactose-specific receptor-mediated endocytosis [151]. It was found that the higher antitumor activity could be achieved with a larger degree of galactose substitution. At the material ratio of Maisine 35-1 and Labrafac CC (1:1): Cremopher El: Transcutol p = 30%:46.7%:23.3%, the highly stable and stable ORI SMEDDS could be formed [152], with bioavailability 2.2-times higher than ORI suspension. Nevertheless, the drug was completely released 12 h after administration.

4. Conclusions

As a natural active ingredient, ORI has a broad prospect of development with its wide range of pharmacological activities. At present, ORI is the main active ingredient of Rabdosia rubescens, which is an OTC herbal medicine (“Donglingcao Pian”) approved by NMPA. However, it is rare to be used as a monomeric drug in clinical applications, considering its limited solubility and bioavailability.
In recent years, many ways have been investigated to improve the solubility and bioavailability of ORI, such as optimizing the chemical structure, loading ORI into nanoparticles, liposomes, etc. Nevertheless, there remains several issues and new directions for future development: (1) In the field of pharmaceutical chemistry, chemical structure modification to improve the water solubility of drugs is the basic method to consider and solve the problem from the essence of dissolution. Based on the structural characteristics of ORI, its structural modification is currently concentrated in four directions: The derivatization of hydroxyl groups, modification of A-ring, modification of the enone system, and the transformation and derivatization of the framework structure. Salt formation and polar group introduction are the basic strategies to improve water solubility, and moderation of the covalent warhead reactivities at the D-ring may be a viable approach to the discovery and development of effective and druglike ORI derivatives in the future. (2) Though some structural modifications can improve membrane permeability and solubility of ORI, the structure–activity relationship was rarely studied and the target and molecular mechanism of action were not clear enough; some target compounds lacked further activity verification. From some studies, the target or regulated signaling pathway of ORI is not single, which suggests that our future research should be based on multiple disease-related targets and signaling pathway networks. (3) The EE and DL of the ORI-loaded carriers are not high enough, requiring larger amounts of carriers in use. However, some carrier materials are not completely degradable and accumulate in the human body after long-term use, which leads to side effects such as liver and kidney toxicity and vascular inflammation. It is worth noting that cyclodextrin mucous membrane can lead to renal toxicity; polyoxyethylene castor oil or polysorbate 80, the surfactant used for injection, results in neurotoxicity and severe allergic reactions; and the improper application of phospholipids will give rise to a hemolytic effect. A safe and effective carrier material is the key to develop the drug delivery system. (4) Despite the fact that cyclodextrin inclusion, nanoparticle, liposome, micellar, and solid dispersion improve the solubility and bioavailability of ORI, they face some other challenges: Liposomes have stability problems like aggregation, fusion and drug leakage during storage; preparations of some nanoparticles, and polymer micelles were still limited in the laboratory scale; the in vivo environment is too complicated for a targeting effect; the mechanism of action for some materials is not clear. Currently, there is no active targeted formulation of ORI in the market. The preparation of drug delivery dosage forms for intravenous administration is an effective strategy to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of ORI derivatives considering bioavailability.
In summary, with the present achievements, the strategy of structural modification has great potential to improve the solubility, bioactivity and safety of ORI, while pharmaceutical formulation has a good effect in improving solubility and bioavailability. Both of the strategies are the research directions of ORI in the future. The combination of the derivatization method and preparation method can achieve better results in future research, with high efficiency, low toxicity and good stability.

Funding

This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (No. BS2014YY047), the Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province, China (No. 2018WS202).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Osawa, K.; Yasuda, H.; Maruyama, T.; Morita, H.; Takeya, K.; Itokawa, H. Antibacterial trichorabdal diterpenes from Rabdosia trichocarpa. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 1287–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, J.X.; Han, Q.B.; Zhao, A.H.; Sun, H.D. Diterpenoids from Isodon japonica. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, C.Y.; Wang, E.Q.; Cheng, Y.; Bao, J.K. Oridonin: An active diterpenoid targeting cell cycle arrest, apoptotic and autophagic pathways for cancer therapeutics. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43, 701–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tian, W.; Chen, S.Y. Recent advances in the molecular basis of anti-neoplastic mechanisms of oridonin. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2013, 19, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, S.; Pei, L.; Li, D.; Yao, H.; Cai, H.; Yao, H.; Wu, X.; Xu, J. Synthesis and antimycobacterial evaluation of natural oridonin and its enmein-type derivatives. Fitoterapia 2014, 99, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Feng, D.; Lin, S.; Xu, L. Multiple -modulation effects of Oridonin on the production of proinflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors in LPS-activated microglia. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, G.A.; Ding, L.; Yang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, Q.M.; Wang, H.Q. Anti-oxidative action of ent-kaurene diterpenoids. Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2006, 32, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, C.; Huang, X.Y.; Lin, Q.; Qian, G.Q.; Dong, W.; Chen, Y.F. Effects and mechanism of oridonin on pulmonary hypertension induced by chronic hypoxia-hypercapnia in rats. Chin. Med. J. 2009, 122, 1380–1387. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, R.Y.; Xu, B.; Chen, S.F.; Chen, S.S.; Zhang, T.; Ren, J.; Xu, J. Effect of oridonin-mediated hallmark changes on inflammatory pathways in human pancreatic cancer (BxPC−3) cells. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 14895–14903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, H.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Ye, J.; Wang, A.; Wang, C.; Liu, Q.; Liang, G.; Deng, X.; Jiang, W.; et al. Oridonin is a covalent NLRP3 inhibitor with strong anti-inflammasome activity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2550–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, J.; Wold, E.A.; Ding, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, J. Therapeutic potential of oridonin and its analogs: From anticancer and antiinflammation to neuroprotection. Molecules 2018, 23, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hu, A.P.; Du, J.M.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, J.W. Oridonin promotes CD4+ /CD25+ Treg differentiation, modulates Th1/Th2 balance and induces HO−1 in rat splenic lymphocytes. Inflamm. Res. 2008, 57, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zang, K.H.; Shao, Y.Y.; Zuo, X.; Rao, Z.; Qin, H.Y. Oridonin alleviates visceral hyperalgesia in a rat model of postinflammatory irritable bowel syndrome: Role of colonic enterochromaffin cell and serotonin availability. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, K.; Zhao, R.; Huang, H.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, S.; Xie, H.; Chen, H.; et al. Targeting AKT with oridonin inhibits growth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and patient-derived xenografts in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1540–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Li, S.; Shi, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, F.; Cheng, G. Oridonin enhances the radiosensitivity of lung cancer cells by upregulating Bax and downregulating Bcl-2. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 4859–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.F.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, P.Q.; Lin, D.J.; Li, X.D.; Chen, G.H. Oridonin inhibits cell growth by induction of apoptosis on human hepatocelluar carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. Hepatol. Res. 2006, 35, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ming, M.; Sun, F.Y.; Zhang, W.T.; Liu, J.K. Therapeutic effect of oridonin on mice with prostate cancer. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 9, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Shen, S.; Wei, X.; Li, G. Oridonin inhibits VEGF-A-associated angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 2289–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, D.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, D.; He, L.; Zhang, H.; Hu, B.; Peng, H.; Ren, D. ROS/JNK/c-Jun axis is involved in oridonin-induced caspase-dependent apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 513, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ding, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Wild, C.; Ye, N.; Ester, C.D.; Xiong, A.; White, M.A.; Shen, Q.; et al. Oridonin ring A-based diverse constructions of enone functionality: Identification of novel dienone analogues effective for highly aggressive breast cancer by inducing apoptosis. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 8814–8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Node, M.; Sai, M.; Fuji, K.; Fujita, E.; Takeda, S.; Unemi, N. Antitumor activity of diterpenoids, trichorabdals A, B, and C, and the related compounds: Synergism of two active sites. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 1433–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, H.D.; Lin, Z.W.; Niu, F.D.; Shen, P.Q.; Pan, L.T.; Lin, L.Z.; Cordell, G.A. Diterpenoids from Isodon eriocalyx var. laxiflora. Phytochemistry 1995, 38, 1451–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.C.; Wei, M.C. Kinetic and characterization studies for three bioactive compounds extracted from Rabdosia rubescens using ultrasound. Food Bioprod. Process 2015, 94, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, W.; Sun, J.; Zhang, T.T.; Ma, B.; Cui, S.M.; Chen, D.W.; He, Z.G. Pharmacokinetic behaviors and oral bioavailability of oridonin in rat plasma. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. 2006, 27, 1642–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Efficacy of rabdosia rubescens in the treatment of gingivitis. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technolog. Med. Sci. 2009, 29, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, F.; Donkor, P.O.; Zhu, Y.; Qiu, F.; Kang, N. Molecular mechanisms of apoptosis and autophagy elicited by combined treatment with oridonin and cetuximab in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Apoptosis 2019, 24, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, L.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Jin, Y. Drug-loaded PLGA electrospraying porous microspheres for the local therapy of primary lung cancer via pulmonary delivery. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ding, Y.; Ding, C.Y.; Ye, N.; Liu, Z.Q.; Wold, E.A.; Chen, H.Y.; Wild, C.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, J. Discovery and development of natural product oridonin-inspired anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 122, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cheng, W.Y.; Huang, C.H.; Ma, W.F.; Tian, X.J.; Zhang, X.J. Recent Development of oridonin derivatives with diverse pharmacological activities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hutchinson, I.; Jennings, S.A.; Vishnuvajjala, B.R.; Westwell, A.D.; Stevens, M.F.G. Antitumor benzothiazoles. 16 Synthesis and pharmaceutical properties of antitumor 2-(4-aminophenyl)-benzothiazole amino acid prodrugs. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 744–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Wild, C.; Chu, L.; Liu, H.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, J. Novel nitrogen-enriched oridonin analogues with thiazole-fused a-ring: Protecting group-free synthesis, enhanced anticancer profile, and improved aqueous solubility. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5048–5058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Cummins, C.B.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, J.M.; Hughes, B.D.; Ding, Y.; Chen, H.Y.; Zhou, J.; Radhakrishnan, R.S. Antifibrosis Effect of Novel Oridonin Analog CYD0618 Via Suppression of the NF-κB Pathway. J. Surg. Res. 2018, 232, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dalziel, M.; Crispin, M.; Scanlan, C.N.; Zitzmann, N.; Dwek, R.A. Emerging principles for the therapeutic exploitation of glycosylation. Science 2014, 343, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. YAN, X.B.; Lei, M.; Zhang, Y.J.; Liu, H.M. Synthesis of oridonin glucopyranoside. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 25, 222–224. [Google Scholar]
  35. Szablewski, L. Expression of glucose transporters in cancers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013, 1835, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Greenwald, R.B. PEG drugs: An overview. J. Control. Release 2001, 74, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Veronese, F.M.; Mero, A. The impact of PEGylation on biological therapies. Bio. Drugs 2008, 22, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shen, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Jia, L.; Zheng, D.; Liu, G.; Hao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, X.; Li, C.; et al. Synthesis characterization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of PEGylated oridonin conjugates. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 456, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Ran, Q.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Hua, W.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, L.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1-O- and 14-O-derivatives of oridonin as potential anticancer drug candidates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4741–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, G.Y. Amino acids: Metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids 2009, 37, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vig, B.S.; Huttunen, K.M.; Laine, K.; Rautio, J. Amino acids as promoieties in prodrug design and development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Ran, Q.; Li, D.H.; Yao, H.Q.; Zhang, Y.H.; Yuan, S.T.; Zhang, L.Y.; Shen, M.Q.; Xu, J.Y. Synthesis and anti-tumor activity of 14-O-derivatives of natural oridonin. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2011, 9, 194–198. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rautio, J.; Kumpulainen, H.; Heimbach, T.; Oliyai, R.; Oh, D.; Jarvinen, T.; Savolainen, J. Prodrugs: Design and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, P.Y.; Wu, G.L.; Qiu, Z.J.; Chen, Y.J. L-alanine-(14-oridonin) Ester Trifluoroacetate as Well as Preparation Method and Application. Chinese Patent CN 104,017,000 A, 3 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Singh, J.; Petter, R.C.; Baillie, T.A.; Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barf, T.; Kaptein, A. Irreversible protein kinase inhibitors: Balancing the benefits and risks. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6243–6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Backus, K.M.; Correia, B.E.; Lum, K.M.; Forli, S.; Horning, B.D.; Gonzalez-Paez, G.E.; Chatterjee, S.; Lanning, B.R.; Teijaro, J.R.; Olson, A.J.; et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems. Nature 2016, 534, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ding, Y.; Li, D.F.; Ding, C.Y.; Wang, P.Y.; Liu, Z.Q.; Wold, E.A.; Ye, N.; Chen, H.Y.; White, M.A.; Shen, Q.; et al. Regio- and Stereospecific Synthesis of Oridonin D-Ring Aziridinated Analogues for the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer via Mediated Irreversible Covalent Warheads. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 2737–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brewster, M.E.; Vandecruys, R.; Peeters, J.; Neeskens, P.; Verreck, G.; Loftsson, T. Comparative interaction of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin with itraconazole: Phase-solubility behavior and stabilization of supersaturated drug solutions. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 34, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grau, M.J.; Kayser, O.; Müller, R.H. Nanosuspensions of poorly soluble drugs—Reproducibility of small scale production. Int. J. Pharm. 2000, 196, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Prof, D.I.; Wolfram, S. Cyclodextrin inclusion compounds in research and industry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1980, 19, 344–362. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, W.; Zhao, B.; Li, Y.C.; Liu, H.M. NMR spectra and structures of oridonin derivatives complexes with β-cyclodextrin. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2011, 49, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pralhad, T.; Rajendrakumar, K. Study of freeze-dried QC cyclodextrin binary systems by DSC, FT-IR, X-ray diffraction and SEM analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 34, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, Z.; Xu, W.; Sun, J.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, T.; He, Z. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of an inclusion complex of oridonin and 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2008, 34, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Halasz, K.; Kelly, S.J.; Iqbal, M.T.; Pathak, Y.; Sutariya, V. Micro/nanoparticle delivery systems for ocular diseases. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2019, 17, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, J.; Cao, Y.; Yuan, Q. Preparation and Photocytotoxicity in vitro of oridonin-porphyrin-chitosan microspheres. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 37, 759–766. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhu, L.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Du, L.; Jin, Y. Inhalable oridonin-loaded poly(lactic–glycolic) acid large porous microparticles for treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2017, 7, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, C.; Li, W.; Hu, B. The anti-tumor effect of folate-targeted liposome microbubbles loaded with oridonin as ultrasound-triggered tumor-targeted therapeutic carrier system. J. Drug Target. 2017, 25, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Keck, C.M.; Müller, R.H. Drug nanocrystals of poorly soluble drugs produced by high pressure homogenization. Eur. Pharm. Biopharm. 2006, 62, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Müller, R.H.; Gohla, S.; Keck, C.M. State of the art of nanocrystals special features, production, nanotoxicology aspects and intracellular delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 78, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kesisoglou, F.; Panmai, S.; Wu, Y.H. Nanosizing-oral formulation development and biopharmaceutical evaluation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Roa, W.H.; Azarmi, S.; Al-Hallak, M.H.D.K.; Finlay, W.H.; Magliocco, A.M.; Löbenberg, R. Inhalable nanoparticles, a noninvasive approach to treat lung cancer in a mouse model. J. Control. Release 2011, 150, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cerdeira, A.M.; Mazzotti, M.; Gander, B. Miconazole nanosuspensions: Influence of formulation variables on particle size reduction and physical stability. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 396, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Patravale, V.B.; Date, A.A.; Kulkarni, R.M. Nanosuspension: A promsing drug delivery strategy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Krause, K.P.; Müller, R.H. Production and characterisation of highly concentrated nanosuspensions by high pressure homogenisation. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 214, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sinha, B.; Müller, R.H.; Möschwitzer, J.P. Bottom-up approaches for preparing drug nanocrystals: Formulations and factors affecting particle size. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 453, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gao, L.; Zhang, D.; Chen, M.; Zheng, T.; Wang, S. Preparation and characterization of an oridonin nanosuspension for solubility and dissolution velocity enhancement. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2007, 33, 1332–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, L.; Zhang, D.; Chen, M.; Duan, C.; Dai, W.; Jia, L.; Zhao, W. Studies on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of oridonin nanosuspensions. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 355, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lou, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, L.; Feng, F.; Wang, J.; Wei, X.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Q. In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of oridonin nanosuspension. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 379, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xue, W.; Yang, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Lou, H. Effects of oridonin nanosuspension on cell proliferation and apoptosis of human prostatic carcinoma PC-3 cell line. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lou, H.; Gao, L.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q. Oridonin nanosuspension enhances anti-tumor efficacy in SMMC−7721 cells and H22 tumor bearing mice. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 87, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Feng, F.F.; Zhang, D.R.; Tian, K.L.; Lou, H.Y.; Qi, X.L.; Wang, Y.C.; Duan, C.X.; Jia, L.J.; Wang, F.H.; Liu, Y.; et al. Growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis in MCF−7 breast cancer cells by oridonin nanosuspension. Drug Deliv. 2011, 18, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Qi, X.; Zhang, D.; Xu, X.; Feng, F.; Ren, G.; Chu, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, K. Oridonin nanosuspension was more effective than free oridonin on G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell line. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1793–1804. [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu, P.; Rong, X.; Laru, J.; Van, V.B.; Kiesvaara, J.; Hirvonen, J.; Laaksonen, T.; Peltonen, L. Nanosuspensions of poorly soluble drugs: Preparation and development by wet milling. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 411, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tuomela, A.; Liu, P.; Puranen, J.; Rönkkö, S.; Laaksonen, T.; Kalesnykas, G.; Oksala, O.; Ilkka, J.; Laru, J.; Järvinen, K.; et al. Brinzolamide nanocrystal formulations for ophthalmic delivery: Reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in vivo. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 467, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, X.; Zhang, T.; Lan, Y.; Wu, B.; Shi, Z. Nanosuspensions containing oridonin/HP-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes for oral bioavailability enhancement via improved dissolution and permeability. AAPS PharmSciTech 2016, 17, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Soppimath, K.S.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Kulkarni, A.R.; Rudzinski, W.E. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J. Control. Release 2001, 70, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xing, J.; Zhang, D.; Tan, T. Studies on the oridonin-loaded poly (d,l-lactic acid) nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 40, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Y.T.; Feng, S.S. Surfactant chain length effects on nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers for targeted drug delivery. AIChE J. 2012, 58, 3289–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Feng, N.; Wu, P.; Li, Q.; Mei, Y.; Shi, S.; Yu, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Oridonin-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly (ethylene oxide)-poly(ε-caprolactone) copolymer nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization, and antitumor activity on mice with transplanted hepatoma. J. Drug Target. 2008, 16, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mei, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, J.; Feng, N.; Liu, Y.; Wei, L. An HPLC method for determination of oridonin in rabbits using isopsoralen as an internal standard and its application to pharmacokinetic studies for oridonin-loaded nanoparticles. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2008, 869, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, J.; Zhao, J.H.; Liu, Y.; Feng, N.P.; Zhang, Y.T. RGD-modified poly (D, L-lactic acid) nanoparticles enhance tumor targeting of oridonin. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 211–219. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tian, Q.; Zhang, C.N.; Wang, X.H.; Wang, W.; Huang, W.; Cha, R.T.; Wang, C.H.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, M.; Wan, H.Y.; et al. Glycyrrhetinic acid-modified chitosan/poly (ethylene glycol) nanoparticles for liver-targeted delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 4748–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zheng, D.; Duan, C.; Zhang, D.; Jia, L.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, C.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Q. Galactosylated chitosan nanoparticles for epatocyte-targeted delivery of oridonin. Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 436, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, C.; Zhang, D.; Guo, H.; Hao, L.; Zheng, D.; Liu, G.; Shen, J.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and characterization of galactosylated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for liver-targeted delivery of oridonin. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 448, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, C.Y.; Zhang, D.R.; Guo, Y.Y.; Guo, H.J.; Li, T.T.; Hao, L.L.; Zheng, D.D.; Liu, G.P.; Zhang, Q. Galactosylated bovine serum albumin nanoparticles for parenteral delivery of oridonin: Tissue distribution and pharmacokinetic studies. J. Microencapsul. 2014, 31, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, G.; Guo, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, Z.; Cheng, H. Novel galactosylated biodegradable nanoparticles for hepatocyte-delivery of oridonin. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 502, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shi, C.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Wang, F.; Luan, Y. Co-delivery of docetaxel and chloroquine via PEO-PPO-PCL/TPGS micelles for overcoming multidrug resistance. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 495, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shi, C.H.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Wang, F.; Ji, X.Q.; Zhao, Z.X.; Luan, Y.X. Docetaxel-loaded PEO–PPO–PCL/TPGS mixed micelles for overcoming multidrug resistance and enhancing antitumor efficacy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4259–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mehnert, W.; Mäder, K. Solid lipid nanoparticles production, characterization and applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 165–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Luo, Y.F.; Chen, D.W.; Ren, L.X.; Zhao, X.L.; Qin, J. Solid lipid nanoparticles for enhancing vinpocetine’s oral bioavailability. J. Control. Release 2006, 114, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Müller, R.H.; Mäder, K.; Gohla, S. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery—A review of the state of the art. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000, 50, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, D.; Tan, T.; Gao, L. Preparation of oridonin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles and studies on them in vitro and in vivo. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 5821–5828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, L.; Wang, S.P.; Chen, R.E.; Wang, Y.P.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.T.; Chen, M.W. Oridonin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles enhanced antitumor activity in MCF-7 cells. J. Nanomater. 2014, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Joshi, M.; Pathak, S.; Sharma, S.; Patravale, V. Design and in vivo pharmacodynamics evaluation of nanostructured lipid carriers for parenteral delivery of artemether: Nanoject. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 346, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lin, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, L.; Yu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, W. Preparation and characterization of monocaprate nanostructured lipid carriers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 311, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yuan, H.; Wang, L.L.; Du, Y.Z.; You, J.; Hu, F.Q.; Zeng, S. Preparation and characteristics of nanostructured lipid carriers for control-releasing progesterone by melt-emulsification. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 60, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Müller, R.H.; Petersen, R.D.; Hommoss, A.; Pardeike, J. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic dermal products. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Han, F.; Li, S.; Yin, R.; Liu, H.; Xu, L. Effect of surfactants on the formation and characterization of a new type of colloidal drug delivery system: Nanostructured lipid carriers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2008, 315, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Porter, C.J.H.; Trevaskis, N.L.; Charman, W.N. Lipids and lipid-based formulations: Optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Selvamuthukumar, S.; Velmurugan, R. Nanostructured lipid carriers: A potential drug carrier for cancer chemotherapy. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Patel, D.; Dasgupta, S.; Dey, S.; Ramani, Y.R.; Ray, S.; Mazumder, B. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC)-based gel for the topical delivery of aceclofenac preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation. Sci. Pharm. 2012, 80, 749–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Dai, W.; Zhang, D.; Duan, C.; Jia, L.; Wang, Y.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and characteristics of oridonin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers as a controlled-release delivery system. J. Microencapsul. 2010, 27, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Jia, L.; Shen, J.; Zhang, D.; Duan, C.; Liu, G.; Zheng, D.; Tian, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of oridonin-loaded long circulating nanostructured lipid carriers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 50, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zheng, D.; Dai, W.; Zhang, D.; Duan, C.; Jia, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q. In vivo studies on the oridonin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. Drug Deliv. 2012, 19, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, H.; Ma, Z.; Wu, B. Nanostructured lipid carriers used for oral delivery of oridonin:an effect of ligand modification on absorption. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 479, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Liu, J.G.; Zhang, M.Y.; Yu, M.L.; Feng, N.P. Wheat germ agglutinin modification of lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles: Enhanced cellular uptake and bioadhesion. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 36125–36135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Dang, B.; Feng, N. Mucosal transfer of wheat germ agglutinin modified lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for oral delivery of oridonin. Nanomedicine 2017, 13, 2219–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bangham, A.D.; Standish, M.M.; Watkins, J.C. Diffusion of univalentions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids. J. Mol. Biol. 1965, 13, 238–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhuang, Q.; Liu, X.; Sun, Z.; Wang, H.; Jiang, J. A validated UPLC-MS/MS method to determine free and total irinotecan and its two metabolites in human plasma after intravenous administration of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome injection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 170, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, K.; Shao, Q.; Feng, N. Improved oral bioavailability of notoginsenoside R1 with sodium glycocholate-mediated liposomes: Preparation by supercritical fluid technology and evaluation in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 552, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ferreira, K.S.A.; Santos, B.M.A.D.; Lucena, N.P.; Ferraz, M.S.; Carvalho, R.S.F.; Duarte, A.P., Jr.; Magalhães, N.S.S.; Lira, R.P.C. Ocular delivery of moxifloxacin-loaded liposomes. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2018, 81, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, M.; Wang, L.; Li, R.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y. Metabolic profile of lung-targeted docetaxel liposomes in rabbits, rats and mice. Xenobiotica 2019, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang, Y.; Xia, Q.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Li, Z.; Guo, T.; Wu, Z.; Feng, N. CD44 assists the topical anti-psoriatic efficacy of curcumin-loaded hyaluronan-modified ethosomes: A new strategy for clustering drug in inflammatory skin. Theranostics 2019, 9, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Allen, T.M.; Cullis, P.R. Drug delivery systems: Entering the mainstream. Science 2004, 303, 1818–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Woodle, M.C.; Lasic, D.D. Sterically stabilized liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1113, 171–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Maruyama, K. Intracellular targeting delivery of liposomal drugs to solid tumors based on EPR effects. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, C.; Wei, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhang, L. The effect of stealth liposomes on pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and anti-tumor activity of oridonin. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2009, 63, 409–416. [Google Scholar]
  119. Sun, X.Y.; Qu, C.X.; Lin, H.; Dong, J.Y. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of freeze-dried oridonin-loaded PEGylated liposomes. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2014, 33, 1144–1150. [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang, C.J.; Zhu, G.J.; Yu, L.; Shi, B.H. Preparation, in vitro, and in vivo antitumor activity of folate receptor-targeted nanoliposomes containing oridonin. Drug Dev. Res. 2013, 74, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Guo, B.H.; Cheng, Y.; Lin, L.P.; Lin, D.H.; Wu, W. Preparation and characterization of galactose-modified liposomes by a nonaqueous enzymatic reaction. J. Liposome Res. 2011, 21, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guo, B.; Cheng, Y.; Li, N.; Li, X.; Jin, M.; Li, T.; Li, J. In vitro and in vivo studies of galactose-modified liver-targeting liposomes. J. Drug Target. 2013, 21, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Moffitt, M.; Zhang, L.; Khougaz, K.; Eisenberg, A. Micellization of ionic block copolymers in three 28 dimensions. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, W.; Peng, H.; Ning, F.; Yao, L.; Luo, M.; Zhao, Q.; Xiong, H. Amphiphilic chitosan derivative-based core-shell micelles: Synthesis, characterisation and properties for sustained release of vitamin D3. Food. Chem. 2014, 152, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Rösler, A.; Vandermeulen, G.W.M.; Klok, H.A. Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 53, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shuai, X.; Ai, H.; Nasongkla, N.; Kim, S.; Gao, J. Micellar carriers based on block copolymers of poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly (ethylene glycol) for doxorubicin delivery. J. Control. Release 2004, 98, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhang, L.; Gu, F.X.; Chan, J.M.; Wang, A.Z.; Langer, R.S.; Farokhzad, O.C. Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 83, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, W.T.; Wang, D.K.; He, X.X.; Pan, Y.; Huang, Q.B.; Han, L.; Lin, L.F.; Liu, X.T. Preparation and characterization of oridonin-loaded block copolymer micelles. Chin. J. New Drugs 2009, 18, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar]
  129. Xue, B.; Wang, Y.; Tang, X.; Xie, P.; Wang, Y.; Luo, F.; Wu, C.; Qian, Z. Biodegradable self-assembled MPEG-PCL micelles for hydrophobic oridonin delivery in vitro. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2012, 8, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhao, Y.X.; Hua, H.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.Z. Cytotoxicity and cellular kinetics of oridonin-loaded cholesterol formate-graft chitosan copolymer nano-micelles. J. Control. Release 2013, 172, E90–E91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dian, L.; Yu, E.; Chen, X.; Wen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, G.; Wu, C. Enhancing oral bioavailability of quercetin using novel soluplus polymeric micelles. Nanoscale. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 684–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Hou, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, E.; Yang, L.; Yan, H.M.; Jia, X.B.; Zhang, Z.H. Preparation and evaluation of icariside II-loaded binary mixed micelles using Solutol HS15 and Pluronic F127 as carriers. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 3248–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Chang, T.; Gosain, P.; Stenzel, M.H.; Lord, M.S. Drug-loading of poly (ethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate) (PEGMEMA)—Based micelles and mechanisms of uptake in colon carcinoma cells. Colloids. Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2016, 144, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ke, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Jia, X.; Wang, Y. Optimization and evaluation of Oridonin-loaded Soluplus-Pluronic P105 mixed micelles for oral administration. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 518, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Fang, X.B.; Xu, Y.Q.; Chan, H.F.; Wang, C.M.; Zheng, Q.; Xiao, F.; Chen, M.W. A Redox-sensitive and RAGE-targeting nanocarrier for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2016, 13, 3613–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Letzner, H. New materials and methods for clinically and esthetically acceptable restorations. Quintessenz Zahntech. 1988, 14, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  137. Bland, S. New materials and methods for next generation technologies. Mater. Today 2016, 19, 243. [Google Scholar]
  138. Shi, X.; Peng, T.; Huang, Y.; Mei, L.; Gu, Y.; Huang, J.; Han, K.; Li, G.; Hu, C.; Pan, X.; et al. Comparative studies on glycerol monooleate- and phytantriol-based cubosomes containing oridonin in vitro and in vivo. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2017, 22, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, C.J.; Li, A. Preparation, Characterization, and in vitro and vivo antitumor activity of oridonin-conjugated multiwalled carbon nanotubes functionalized with carboxylic group. J. Nanomater. 2016, 10, 1687–1693. [Google Scholar]
  140. Chen, X.Y.; Shi, Y.L.; Yang, D.; Hu, J.H.; Yang, P.Y. Preparation of polystyrene functionalized graphene by atom transfer nitroxide radical coupling reaction. Acta Chim. Sin. 2012, 70, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Xu, Z.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Shi, P.; Wang, B.C.; Huang, X.Y. Functionalized graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for loading and delivering of oridonin. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 33, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Chai, D.D.; Hao, B.J.; Hu, R.; Zhang, F.; Yan, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.X.; Jiang, H. Delivery of Oridonin and Methotrexate via PEGylated Graphene Oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 22915–22924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ibrahim, M.; Sabouni, R.; Husseini, G.A. Anti-cancer drug delivery using metal organic frameworks (MOFs). Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Leng, X.; Dong, X.; Wang, W.; Sai, N.; Yang, C.; You, L.; Huang, H.; Yin, X.; Ni, J. Biocompatible Fe-based micropore metal-organic frameworks as sustained-release anticancer drug carriers. Molecules 2018, 23, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Chen, G.S.; Luo, J.Y.; Cai, M.R.; Qin, L.Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Gao, L.L.; Huang, P.Q.; Yu, Y.C.; Ding, Y.M.; Dong, X.X.; et al. Investigation of Metal-Organic Framework−5 (MOF−5) as an Antitumor Drug Oridonin Sustained Release Carrier. Molecules 2019, 24, 3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Qiu, W.; Chen, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, L.; Cui, W.; Zhang, J.; Ye, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Oridonin-loaded and GPC1-targeted gold nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy in pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 6809–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Pi, J.; Jiang, J.; Cai, H.; Yang, F.; Jin, H.; Yang, P.; Cai, J.; Chen, Z.W. GE11 peptide conjugated selenium nanoparticles for EGFR targeted oridonin delivery to achieve enhanced anticancer efficacy by inhibiting EGFR-mediated PI3K/AKT and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathways. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 1549–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Jiang, J.H.; Pi, J.; Jin, H.; Cai, J.Y. Functional graphene oxide as cancer-targeted drug delivery system to selectively induce oesophageal cancer cell apoptosis. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, S297–S307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.; Feng, N. Development and in-vivo assessment of the bioavailability of oridonin solid dispersions by the gas anti-solvent technique. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 411, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Duan, C.X.; Zhang, D.R.; Wang, F.H.; Zheng, D.D.; Jia, L.J.; Feng, F.F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Tian, K.L.; Wang, F.S.; et al. Chitosan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) based nanogels for tumor extracellular targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 409, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Duan, C.; Gao, J.; Zhang, D.; Jia, L.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, D.; Liu, G.; Tian, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q. Galactose-decorated pH-responsive nanogels for hepatoma-targeted delivery of oridonin. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 4335–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, P.; Liu, Y.; Feng, N.; Xu, J. Preparation and evaluation of self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of oridonin. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 355, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular structure and typical modification sites of Oridonin (ORI).
Figure 1. Molecular structure and typical modification sites of Oridonin (ORI).
Molecules 25 00332 g001
Figure 2. Routes for introduction of thiazole rings at the C(1) and C(2) sites on ORI.
Figure 2. Routes for introduction of thiazole rings at the C(1) and C(2) sites on ORI.
Molecules 25 00332 g002
Figure 3. Synthesis of ORI-6-O-β-d-glucopyranoside.
Figure 3. Synthesis of ORI-6-O-β-d-glucopyranoside.
Molecules 25 00332 g003
Figure 4. PEGylation and esterification of ORI.
Figure 4. PEGylation and esterification of ORI.
Molecules 25 00332 g004
Figure 5. Amino acid modification and aziridination of ORI.
Figure 5. Amino acid modification and aziridination of ORI.
Molecules 25 00332 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the preparation of ORI-Gal-PT-NPs.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the preparation of ORI-Gal-PT-NPs.
Molecules 25 00332 g006
Figure 7. Structural comparison of lipid nanoparticles (a) and liposomes (b).
Figure 7. Structural comparison of lipid nanoparticles (a) and liposomes (b).
Molecules 25 00332 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of copolymer micelle formation.
Figure 8. Illustration of copolymer micelle formation.
Molecules 25 00332 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of preparation of (a) ORI-GPC1-NPs. (b) GE11-ORI-Se NPs.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of preparation of (a) ORI-GPC1-NPs. (b) GE11-ORI-Se NPs.
Molecules 25 00332 g009
Table 1. Pharmacological activities of ORI.
Table 1. Pharmacological activities of ORI.
ActivitiesMechanism of ActionsRef.
Anti-cancerRepressing cell cycle, down-regulating telomerase activity, inhibiting cell membrane sodium pump activity, inducing tumor cell apoptosis[3,4]
Anti-bacterial-[5]
NeuroregulationUpregulating the production of the neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor[6]
Anti-oxidationScavenging active oxygen free radicals[7]
DepressurizationInducing pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell apoptosis[8]
Anti-inflammationDown-regulating the inflammatory factors IL-figure1β, IL-6, and IL−33; Blocking the interaction between NLRP3 and NEK7, inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation[9,10,11]
Immune-modulatingPromoting CD4+ /CD25+ Treg differentiation; modulating Th1/Th2 balance[12]
AnalgesiaReducing colonic EC cell hyperplasia and 5-HT availability[13]
Table 2. Cytotoxicity and pharmacodynamics study of ORI nanosuspension.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity and pharmacodynamics study of ORI nanosuspension.
Research ObjectsBiological Activity or MechanismRef.
New Zealand white rabbits, Kunming strain miceParticle size affects pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution[68]
K562 cell, S-180 tumor-burdened miceSignificantly more toxic to K562 cells than free ORI (p < 0.01)[69]
PC-3 cellInducing early apoptosis and enhancing growth suppression[70]
SMMC-7721 cell, H22 tumor-bear miceArresting cells in the G2/M phase, tumor volume response ORI-N has a higher anti-tumor effect[71]
MCF-7 cellReducing the expression of Bcl-2 and increasing Bax [72]
PANC-1 cellSuppressing the expression of B1 and p-cdc2 (T161) on G2/M cell phase[73]
SD-ratsImproving dissolution and permeability by interaction with absorptive epithelia and anti-drug efflux.[74]
SD = Sprague Dawley.
Table 3. Examples of different ORI polymer nanoparticles.
Table 3. Examples of different ORI polymer nanoparticles.
Delivery SystemsAdministrationResultsRef.
ORI-PLA-NPsIntravenous administration in mice at a dose of 25 mg/kgHigh concentration of ORI in liver, lung and spleen[78]
ORI-PCL-PEO-PCL-NPsIntravenous administration in H22 tumor-bear mice at a dose of 8 mg/kgTumor volume and weight decreased, and the survival rate increased to 169.6%[80,81]
ORI-PLA-RGD-NPsIntravenous administration in the H22 tumor-bear mice at a dose equivalent to 20 mg/kg of ORIEnhanced targeting effect; tumor volume and weight were significantly reduced (p < 0.01), with average survival length extended from 27 days to 41 days compared with ORI-PLA-NP[82]
ORI-GC-NPsIntravenous administration in mice at a dose of 1 mg/kgProlonging MRT0–t from 3.415 h to 14.042 h, liver AUC0–t increasing by 6.4-fold compared with ORI solution[84]
ORI-GB-NPsIntravenous administration on Wistar rats at a dose of 14 mg/kg and Kunming strain mice at 20 mg/kgThe retarded in vitro release with increasing of crosslinking agent glutaraldehyde; liver active targeting; enhancing the drug plasma concentration and prolonging the circulation time[85,86]
ORI-Gal-PT-NPsTreating HepG2 cells at concentrations of 5.0, 7.5, 10 and 12.5 mg/mLThe apoptosis increasing by 4−5.6% compared with ORI solution[87]
MRT = Mean Retention time.
Table 4. Examples of ORI-loaded liposomes.
Table 4. Examples of ORI-loaded liposomes.
MaterialsPreparation MethodsAdministrationResultsRef.
Cholesterol and soy lecithin, CPA, PEG2000-DSPEThin-film ultrasonic dispersion methodMice injected via the tail vein at 33.5 mg/kgEnhancing T1/2 from 0.65 h to 24.89 h, 85.4% tumor inhibition rate[118]
PEGEthanol injection methodH22 tumor-bearing miceDrug accumulation in tumor cells, prolonged plasma residence[119]
CH, soy bean lecithin, folic acid, N,N’-dicyclohexyl carbodiimide, PEG2000-DSPEThin-film ultrasonic dispersion methodIntravenous administration in tumor-bearing nude BALB/C mice at a dose of 1.5 × 10−2 g/kg/dayBody weight gain, 85.6% tumor inhibition[120]
EPC, CH, NOH,Ethanol injection methodIntravenous administration in mice at a dose of 30 mg/kgEnhancing MRT0–t from 1.69 h to 9.40 h, Enhancing AUC0–t by 4.58-fold, 61.18% Te[121]
T1/2 = Half-Life; Te = Targeting Efficiency; CPA= Cyclophosphamide; PEG2000-DSPE= Polyethylene Glycoldistearoylphosphatidyleth-anolamine; CH = Cholesterol; EPC = Egg Phosphatidylcholine; NOH = N-octadecyl-4-((d-galactopyranosyl) oxy)-2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy Hexanamide.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Dai, M.; Nai, J.; Zhu, L.; Sheng, H. Solubility and Bioavailability Enhancement of Oridonin: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020332

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang S, Dai M, Nai J, Zhu L, Sheng H. Solubility and Bioavailability Enhancement of Oridonin: A Review. Molecules. 2020; 25(2):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yuanyuan, Shaohua Wang, Mengmeng Dai, Jijuan Nai, Liqiao Zhu, and Huagang Sheng. 2020. "Solubility and Bioavailability Enhancement of Oridonin: A Review" Molecules 25, no. 2: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020332

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop