Next Article in Journal
Taurine and Ginsenoside Rf Induce BDNF Expression in SH-SY5Y Cells: A Potential Role of BDNF in Corticosterone-Triggered Cellular Damage
Next Article in Special Issue
PbS Quantum Dots Decorating TiO2 Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Topology, and Optical Properties of the Colloidal Hybrid Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Capacitance/Conductance-Voltage Characteristics of Stored Charges in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suitable Polymeric Coatings to Avoid Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Hybridization in Printed Patterns of Photothermally Responsive Gold Nanoinks
Review

Kissinger Method in Kinetics of Materials: Things to Beware and Be Aware of

Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 S. 14th Street, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Academic Editor: Giuseppe Cirillo
Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2813; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122813
Received: 25 May 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 16 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
The Kissinger method is an overwhelmingly popular way of estimating the activation energy of thermally stimulated processes studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), differential thermal analysis (DTA), and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG). The simplicity of its use is offset considerably by the number of problems that result from underlying assumptions. The assumption of a first-order reaction introduces a certain evaluation error that may become very large when applying temperature programs other than linear heating. The assumption of heating is embedded in the final equation that makes the method inapplicable to any data obtained on cooling. The method yields a single activation energy in agreement with the assumption of single-step kinetics that creates a problem with the majority of applications. This is illustrated by applying the Kissinger method to some chemical reactions, crystallization, glass transition, and melting. In the cases when the isoconversional activation energy varies significantly, the Kissinger plots tend to be almost perfectly linear that means the method fails to detect the inherent complexity of the processes. It is stressed that the Kissinger method is never the best choice when one is looking for insights into the processes kinetics. Comparably simple isoconversional methods offer an insightful alternative. View Full-Text
Keywords: crosslinking polymerization (curing); decomposition; degradation; liquid and solid state; phase transitions; thermal analysis crosslinking polymerization (curing); decomposition; degradation; liquid and solid state; phase transitions; thermal analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vyazovkin, S. Kissinger Method in Kinetics of Materials: Things to Beware and Be Aware of. Molecules 2020, 25, 2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122813

AMA Style

Vyazovkin S. Kissinger Method in Kinetics of Materials: Things to Beware and Be Aware of. Molecules. 2020; 25(12):2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122813

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vyazovkin, Sergey. 2020. "Kissinger Method in Kinetics of Materials: Things to Beware and Be Aware of" Molecules 25, no. 12: 2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122813

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop