Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Antibodies Designed for Matrix Metalloproteinase Modulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Physicochemical Characterization of Softgels Cross-Linked with Cactus Mucilage Extracted from Cladodes of Opuntia Ficus-Indica
Previous Article in Journal
Review on Carbon/Polyaniline Hybrids: Design and Synthesis for Supercapacitor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Chitosan and Fish Gelatin Coatings on Preventing the Deterioration and Preserving the Quality of Fresh-Cut Apples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Induced Aggregation of Epoxy Polysiloxane Grafted Gelatin by Organic Solvent and Green Application

1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
Shandong Institute for Food and Drug Control, Jinan 250101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(12), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24122264
Submission received: 15 May 2019 / Revised: 17 June 2019 / Accepted: 17 June 2019 / Published: 18 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gelatin: Chemistry, Characterization, Application)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we studied the aggregation of amphiphilic polymer epoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-E) grafted gelatin (PGG) in water induced by methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and 1,4-dioxane. The aggregation pattern of the polymer was monitored by infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. It was revealed that the aggregate morphology showed clear dependence on the solvent polarity. The PGG aggregates had regular spherical morphology in polar solvents, including water, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, and acetone. The coating performance was evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and friction experiment, and PGG and acetone coating exhibited excellent coating performance on the surface of pigskin. Gel was formed in acetone and tetrahydrofuran (THF) with the slow evaporation of solvent, and this property can possibly be applied to industrial sewage treatment. White precipitate and soft film were formed in non-polar 1,4-dioxane.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The aggregation of protein/peptide–polymer conjugates in a selective solvent has attracted increasing attention due to their capacity for the formation of a variety of hierarchical nano- and micro-structures or gel [1], which can be applied to biosensors [2], functional materials [3], bioimaging [4], tissue engineering [5] or drug delivery [6,7,8,9]. The aggregation of the conjugates is a synergistic effect of intermolecular noncovalent interactions, including hydrogen bonding, π-π, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and van der Waals interactions [10]. The synergistic effect can be disturbed by solvent polarity or solvent selectivity [11,12,13,14].
The polarity of solvents can influence the power of hydrogen bonding interaction between solute molecules and solvents [15]. Hydrogen bonding between biomolecules and solvents are considered as a dominant factor among the synergistic effect [16]. Even tiny amounts of solvents (e.g., water) will disturb the synergistic effect of the intermolecular noncovalent interactions and further change the aggregation of the conjugates [10]. Sahnawaz Ahmed report that the peptide-perylenediimides conjugate formed fiber-like morphology in relatively non-polar solvents (THF and CHCl3), while in more polar solvents (MeOH, acetone) spherical morphology could be found. Their result showed that the aggregations of the peptide-perylenediimides conjugate clearly depend on the solvent polarity. In polar solvents, the conjugate aggregates more efficiently than in the non-polar solvents, and with decrease in solvent polarity, the dimension of the nano-structures increased [17]. Matthews and Gil report that crystallization of peptides can be tuned by ethanol or methanol for preparation of biological materials [18,19].
The polarity of a solvent molecule is related to its dielectric constant (Ɛ). Normally, when Ɛ is lower than 15, the solvent is considered nonpolar. When Ɛ ranges from 15 to 25, the name medium polar solvent is given. When Ɛ is larger than 25, it is a strong polar solvent. In the paper, solvents, including strong polar water, methanol, and ethanol, medium polar solvents 2-propanol and acetone, and nonpolar solvents tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-dioxane, are selected to induce the aggregation of mono epoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-E) grafted gelatin (PGG) that was synthesized in our previous work [20]. Alcohol, which is thought of as a protic solvent, can be used as both the hydrogen donor and acceptor. Acetone, 1,4-dioxane, and tetrahydrofuran, which are aprotic solvents but contain highly electronegative oxygen, are more likely to accept hydrogen, being that they are hydrogen acceptors [21]. The differing of hydrogen bonding ability in a series of solvents of varying polarity can dramatically affect morphologies, sizes, and functions of aggregates [22,23,24,25,26].
In addition, solvent selectivity is an essential factor for disturbing aggregation patterns of amphiphilic block copolymers with covalently bonded but distinctive blocks. For example, under selectivity solvent mediation, amphoteric block polymer as a material can form various shapes of asymmetric nanoparticles [27,28], nanorings [29], hollow spheres, and so on [30]. Gelatin, as a renewable, cheap, and water soluble protein material, has been widely used in packaging and pharmaceutical and medical applications [31]. PDMS is an inorganic polymer exhibiting excellent performances, such as non-toxicity, air permeability, pliability, low glass transition temperature, is stable and easy to disperse, and it is widely used in the chemical or biological industries [32,33,34]. The compatibility between gelatin and PDMS in selective solvent plays an important role in inducing aggregation of PGG, and following this the diverse aggregation patterns that emerge in a series solvent of varying polarity.
In this study, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the aggregation pattern of PGG. The regular spherical morphology formed in polar solvents, including water, methanol, ethanol, and acetone, which presented a desired coating on the pigskin with excellent wear-resistance and radiation resistance. Gel was formed in acetone and THF with the slow evaporation of solvent, and this property can possibly be used for industrial sewage treatment.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Modification of Gelatin by PDMS-E

The chemical modification of gelatin through grafting reactions between free −NH2 groups and PDMS-E was performed in water. We can see in Figure 1 that grafting density is significantly affected by surfactant structure and concentration. Also, the conversion degree of free −NH2 groups reached the first peak values (24.77%) at 3.0 g L−1. The results show that the variation of the conversion degree with the increase of concentration is not monotonic. It can be deduced that the structure and concentration of surfactants has a large effect on grafting density. Grafting density is enhanced by the compatibility of the two phases and affects aggregation of product in the select solvent. In the work, the reaction condition (SDS, 3.0 g L−1) is chosen, which brings the highest grafting density.

2.2. Aggregation of PGG Induced by Solvents

In this study, organic solvents, including methanol, ethanol, isopropanol alcohol, acetone, THF, and 1,4-dioxane, were selected to tune the aggregation of PGG in water. From the data of dielectric constant, it can be inferred that the order in which polarity decreases is: water > methanol > ethanol > isopropanol alcohol > acetone > THF > 1,4-dioxane. In addition, water, methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol alcohol are protic solvents that can be both hydrogen donor and acceptor. Acetone, THF, and 1,4-dioxane, which contains highly electronegative oxygen atoms, can be regarded as hydrogen acceptors [21]. The difference of hydrogen bonding ability for these solvents induces diverse aggregation. In addition, the selectivity of gelatin component and PDMS component in solvent can lead to a spontaneous aggregation.
Figure 2 shows that PGG presented different morphologies in different solvents. Spherical aggregates were formed in methanol, ethanol, isopropanol alcohol, and acetone system at a PGG solution/solvent ratio of 1:1 (v/v; Figure 2a–d), and smaller-scale spherical aggregates were observed as the PGG solution/solvent ratio decreased to 1:2 (v/v; Figure 2g–i). However, in the acetone system, the decreasing PGG solution/acetone ratio resulted in the formation of coacervate (Figure 2d versus Figure 2j). Interestingly, a double-layer structure was formed in the THF-water system at a PGG solution/solvent ratio of 1:1 (v/v) (Figure 2e). The structure evolved to spherical aggregate at a PGG solution/THF ratio of 1:2 (v/v, Figure 2k). Disordered aggregates were observed in the 1,4-dioxane system (Figure 2f,l). These results suggest that the morphology transformations of PGG aggregates closely depend on the solvent polarity and the hydrogen bonding ability. In polar protic solvent, including methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol alcohol, spherical aggregates tend to form. With the increasing ratio of solvent, the scale of aggregate decreases. However, in nonpolar aprotic solvents THF and 1,4-dioxane, complex morphologies can be obtained, such as double-layer, disordered aggregates or coacervates.
Mirsky and Pauling were the first to suggest that hydrogen bonding was the dominant force of protein folding [35]. This folding force becomes more favorable as the number of polar groups increases [36]. This means that hydrogen bonding, which is affected by solvent polarity, plays a prominent role in controlling the conformation of the protein component. In general, the FTIR spectra of the different samples showed similar peaks and bands of amide A [37], amide I, amide II, and amide III, although with slight differences in the location of the peaks. IR spectroscopy is one of the powerful tools for studying secondary structures of biopolymers. The signals of α-helix, β-sheet, β-turn, and random coil structures, which are located precisely in the amide I, II, and III bands, can be provided [38]. Accurate analysis of the amide III region signal peak is a feasible way to quantify the secondary structure of proteins [39,40,41]. In this region, 1330–1295 cm−1 is designated as the region of the α-helix content, 1295–1270 cm−1 corresponds to the region of the β-turn content, 1270–1250 cm−1 and 1250–1220 cm−1 correspond to the regions of random coil and β-sheet content, respectively. Savitzky-Golay software is used to do 5-point smoothing and deconvolution. Figure S3 shows the IR spectra of the samples of PGG (blank) and PGG in different mixed solvents system. Their secondary structures exhibited obvious differences. Quadratic polynomial integral calculation was carried out according to the literature reports. The statistics of secondary structure content are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 shows that the content of secondary structures in PGG aggregates was obviously affected by solvents. It is found that the sum of α-Helix + β-Sheet shows a certain regularity. In the protic solvent system, the sum of the α-Helix + β-Sheets tends to decrease with the reduction of polarity. In the aprotic solvent, the sums of α-Helix + β-Sheets are larger in THF and acetone systems. In addition, the Helix/Coil ratio shows the aggregation state of PGG in a select solvent. In protic solvents, the Helix/Coil ratios are higher in water, methanol, and ethanol systems, and the ratio tends to decrease with the decrease of polarity. In fact, stable emulsions were formed in water, methanol, and ethanol systems, and the solutions were stratified in 2-Propanol. The results indicate that the higher Helix/Coil ratios induce the stable aggregations in protic solvent. In aprotic solvent, the Helix/Coil ratios are higher in THF and acetone systems, and ordered gel phase was observed in acetone and THF systems with the evaporation of solvent for 2 h. Unexpectedly, The Helix/Coil of PGG-1,4-Dioxane sharply reduced, suggesting an additional phase transition into an unordered structure. The results indicate that hydrogen bonding ability dependent on the solvent polarity should play a significant role in improving interactions between components. In fact, stable emulsions were formed in water, methanol, and ethanol systems, whereas ordered gel phases were observed in acetone and THF systems with the evaporation of solvent for 2 h. These results suggest that the structure of α-Helix and β-Sheet can promote the formation of the ordered and stable aggregation structures.
The XRD patterns of all of the studied samples are listed in Figure 3. The peaks located in the region of 2θ of around 8° and 20° are associated with the diameter of the triple helix and the intensity of the reconstructed triple-helix structure of collagen [42]. With the addition of organic solvents, the peak at 2θ = 8° has changed, which interferes with the reassembling of the triple-helix structure of gelatin during the induction process. The diffraction around 20° were broad and there were no sharp peaks. The peak intensity was weakened as solvent changed from THF, to 1,4-dioxane, to acetone, to 2-propanol, to methanol, to ethanol, and to water, indicating decrease in crystallinity. The peak moved towards a smaller angle, indicating that the covalent structures in different solvents were different. There were also peaks at multiple angular positions (13–14°, 32°, 42°, etc.), indicating a weak phase separation within the system [43]. The solvent did not improve the non-crystalline properties of PGG, and there was a slight phase separation in the system. The solvent changed the conformation of PGG and increased the content of the ordered structure, but the disordered structure was still dominant.

2.3. Coating Performance

The coating performance of PGG was evaluated. Figure 4a shows that the friction resistance of PGG/acetone coating was the highest under both sweat and wet conditions. Acetone is a good solvent for PDMS. In acetone, PDMS should gather on the surface of aggregate. The size of the aggregate in acetone was smaller than that in ethanol, which was beneficial to the coating of aggregates on the surface of finished pigskin. The excellent flexibility and low Tg were conducive to enhancing the resistance to friction. Therefore, the friction resistance times of PGG/acetone coating were more than that of PGG/ethanol. Under both wet and sweat conditions, the friction resistances of these coatings were consistent.
Due to the similar compositions and structures of gelatin and collagen, PGG showed excellent adhesion to the surface of collagen–based materials. After UV irradiation for 2 h, the casein coating turned brownish-yellow, while the PGG coating had no obvious change in color (Figure 4c), which demonstrated that the PGG coating had excellent optical stability under UV radiation. Therefore, the PGG shows excellent coating performance for the pigskin substrate and has a good commercialization potential.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis can help to evaluate the performances of the coatings. The detailed XPS spectra of silicon in Figure 5 indicate several components. After coating, the Si 2p spectrum can be fitted into one peak centered at 101.5 eV. This peak can be assigned to silicon in Si–O bonds. In addition, the contents of silicon in the samples are obtained by XPS spectra, which are described in Table 2. Furthermore, PGG/acetone coating shows the highest silicon content, which helps to improve the friction resistance of the coating. This result is consistent with the results of the friction experiments.

2.4. Gel formation and Its Application

Figure 6 shows the SEM images of gel formed in acetone and THF. Gel formation can be driven by hydrophobic interactions, π-π stacking, and intermolecular hydrogen bonding (H-bonding) [44,45,46,47]. These interactions are inherent in the self-aggregation behavior of natural amino acids [45]. By utilizing these three driving forces, specific properties and functions of macromolecules can be obtained. For example, the convenient preparation of gels has been achieved through hydrophobic interactions [48]. A highly stable gel has been prepared by intermolecular hydrogen bonding between polymer chains and solvents [49]. The addition of solvent might lead to PGG aggregation and decreased solubility [50]. The addition of a polar solvent to the PGG solution increases the polarity of the solution and the interaction between the solvent and the reaction solution, thereby promoting the formation of the gel. The temperature and pH are constant during gel formation (room-temperature). In this study, PGG solution formed a physical gel in polar aprotic solvents by solvent-induced changes of hydrogen bonding, such as hydrogen bonding acceptor, which can break intramolecular hydrogen bonding, and induce intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Figure 6a–e and Figure 6f–j show that, as the PGG solution/acetone or THF (v/v) ratio decreased from 1:1 to 1:5, the solvent–PGG interactions, especially the hydrogen bonding, became strong enough to result in the aggregation of metastable gelator molecules and increase in gel orientation [43].
Figure 7 shows that the gel was still stable as the PGG solution/solvent ratio decreased to 1:10 (v/v). This phenomenon offers the possibility of using PGG for organic wastewater treatment in the current chemical industry, such as the pharmaceutical and catalysis industries. Gelatin and PDMS chains in PGG are non-toxic. They are widely used in the chemical industry. Therefore, PGG cannot cause secondary pollution.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Type A gelatin from pigskin was purchased from China National Pharmaceutical Group Corporation (Beijing, China) and used after dialysis. The isoelectric point (pI, 8.5) of the dialyzed gelatin after complete deionization was determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased from Alfa Aesar and recrystallized from ethanol before use. Ally glycidyl ether (AGE) and chloroplatinic acid hexahydrate (H2Pt6Cl6•6H2O) were obtained from Alfa Aesar. Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3, >95%), n–butyllithium (C4H9Li, >99%), and chlorodimethylsilane (C2H7ClSi, >99%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Benzene, deionized water (conductivity = 2.06 µS cm−1, dielectric constant ε = 80.40), methanol (ε = 32.70), ethanol (ε = 24.50), isopropanol alcohol (ε = 17.90), acetone (ε = 20.70), tetrahydrofuran (THF, ε = 7.58), and 1,4-dioxane (ε = 2.25) solvents (China National Pharmaceutical Group Corporation) were all of analytical reagent (AR) grade and strictly dehydrated before use.

3.2. Synthesis of α–[3–(2,3–epoxy–propoxy)propyl]–ω–butyl–polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMS-E) Grafted Gelatin

D3, C4H9Li, and C2H7ClSi were used to synthesize polydimethylsiloxanes with a Si–H group at one end (PDMS-H) through anionic addition polymerization. First, 10 mL of benzene were added to a flask and then 24 mL of C4H9Li were added. After reducing pressure and ventilation with argon gas, 45.99 g of D3 resolved in 40 mL of benzene was added to the flask. After reaction for 30 min, 50 mL of THF was added into the system to react for 8 h. Then, 11 mL of C2H7ClSi was injected into the flask to stop the reaction. The solution was first filtered by a sand-core filter to remove the lithium chloride precipitate. Then, the filtrate was distilled under reduced pressure at 50 °C (−0.01 Mpa) to remove the low-boiling-point solvent. Subsequently, the temperature was increased to 90 °C to remove the unreacted D3 to obtain purified PDMS-H (Figure S1 (SI)). PDMS-E was then prepared by hydrolyzation of PDMS-H and AGE under Pt–catalyst (Mw = 1.14 × 103 g mol−1, Mw/Mn = 1.16, Figure S2 (SI)).
All gelatin samples were prepared from a stock solution of dialyzed gelatin in order to minimize experimental errors. The 130-mL stock solution was prepared by dissolving gelatin in distilled water (5 wt%) and stirring for 3 h at 50 °C. Subsequently, the pH of the stock solution was adjusted to 10.0 using NaOH solution (2.0 mol L−1, about 220 µL). SDS was added to the gelatin solution with SDS concentration set at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 g/L−1. The solution was stirred for 6 h. Then, PDMS-E was added to the above solution at 50 °C at a rate of 20 drops/min−1 with stirring until the epoxy groups or primary amino groups ratio reached 0.8:1.0 (mol:mol). The reaction was allowed to continue for another 24 h. After reaction for 24 h, the solutions were cooled to 5 °C for concentration, and the content of free −NH2 groups was tested by the Van Slyke method at 40 °C and trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) assay at pH = 10.5 [20]. Finally, the pH of the reaction solution was adjusted to 7.0 with HCl solution (2.0 mol L−1, about 150 µL).

3.3. Aggregation of PGG in Mixed Solvent

The 130 mL stock solution was divided into 13 equal parts. One part was used as blank, and organic solvents were added to the other parts. The organic solvents included methanol, ethanol, isopropanol alcohol, acetone, THF, and 1,4-dioxane. We calculated the amount of water in the reaction liquid, and based on this, we set the amount of solvent, adding different proportions of solvent. The volume ratios of reaction liquid to solvent were set to 1:1 or 1:2.

3.4. Characterization

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images were acquired on a Tecnai JEM-2100 (Japan Electronics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a charge coupled device (CCD) camera (Gatan Bioscan, Pleasanton, CA, USA) at 100 kV with a point resolution higher than 0.19 nm. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded using a Bruker Tensor–27 Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (spectral range between 4000 and 450 cm−1, Bruker Co., Billerica, MA, USA). Solution samples were dried by freeze drying. Thirteen samples were obtained and were measured at room temperature in the solid state using a single reflection diamond attenuated total reflectance. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were characterized using a Bruker D8 advanced X-ray powder diffractometer with Cu-Ka radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were performed on FEI Quanta 200 with accelerating voltage 20 kV. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were carried out by a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250 spectrometer (ThermoScientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA) with a pass energy of 20 eV and a power of 60W (=5 mA × 12 kV) under the Al Kα line (1486.6 eV).

3.5. Coating Performance

First, a piece of pigskin was degreased after fleshing and then re-tanned with resin. The finished pigskin was cut into samples with size of 30 cm × 30 cm and sixteen samples were obtained. Second, 160 g of PGG solution was mixed into ethanol or acetone at Vsolvent:Vsolution = 2:1 (v/v). Solid content was about 15% in the mixed system. Casein paint sample was prepared by dissolving 1.5 g of 256# (trade name of casein paint, made in San Francisco; casein paint, derived from milk protein, is a fast-drying, water-soluble medium used by artists) into 100 g of water. Third, 30.0 g of mixture of PGG solution and ethanol or acetone was coated onto the surface of the finished pigskin. Additionally, 10.0 g of PGG solution and 10.0 g of 256# solution were directly coated onto the surface of finished pigskin, respectively. All coated pigskin samples were laid in an environment with the ideal temperature and humidity for three days and then tested for their resistance to friction under dry, wet, and sweat conditions. Uncoated finished pigskin was used for reference. The samples were placed in the friction machine for testing. The degree of surface wear was designed and friction times were compared for different coatings. In addition, the pigskins coated with 10.0 g of PGG solution and 10.0 g of 256# solution were compared in their resistance to radiation. The samples were laid under UV light (λ = 365 nm) for 2 h and the color variation was compared. Finally, the pigskin coated with 10.0 g of PGG solution was used to test the adhesion index of the coating layer.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the aggregation of PGG in water was tuned by six organic solvents, including methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran, and 1,4-dioxane. TEM, IR, XRD, and SEM analyses showed that the aggregation pattern of PGG was affected by the solvent polarity and selectivity. PGG showed regular spherical morphology in polar solvents, including water, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, and acetone, and exhibited excellent coating performance on the surface of pigskin. Gel was formed in acetone and THF with the slow evaporation of solvent, and gel orientation increased with increase in the volume proportion of organic solvent. This property offers the possibility of applying PGG to organic sewage treatment in the chemical industry.

Supplementary Materials

Including synthetic route of epoxy polysiloxane (Figures S1 and S2), IR spectroscopy characterization of blank and solvent-polymer films (Figure S3).

Author Contributions

J.X. and T.L. conceived and designed the experiments. Z.Z., H.M., Z.C., H.C., J.Z. and H.D. performed the experiments. D.Z. contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. J.X. wrote the paper; all the authors discussed the results.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21606138), and Program for Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.F.; Xie, F.; Duan, P.F.; Liu, M.H. Dynamic evolution of coaxial nanotoruloid in the self-assembled naphthyl-containing l-glutamide. Langmuir 2016, 32, 12534–12541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ding, Y.; Li, D.; Zhao, K.; Du, W.; Zheng, J.; Yang, M. A water-dispersible, ferrocene-tagged peptide nanowire for amplified electrochemical immunosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 48, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Song, Y.; Challa, S.R.; Medforth, C.J.; Qiu, Y.; Watt, R.K.; Peña, D.; Miller, J.E.; van Swol, F.; Shelnutt, J.A. Synthesis of peptide-nanotube platinum-nanoparticle composites. Chem. Commun. 2004, 7, 1044–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, X.; Cui, Y.; Qi, W.; Su, Y.; Yang, Y.; He, Q.; Li, J. Self-assembly of peptide-based colloids containing lipophilic nanocrystals. Small 2008, 4, 1687–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jayawarna, V.; Ali, M.; Jowitt, T.A.; Miller, A.E.; Saiani, A.; Gough, J.E.; Ulijn, R.V. Nanostructured hydrogels for three-dimensional cell culture through self-assembly of fluorenylme-thoxycarbonyl-dipeptides. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bellomo, E.G.; Wyrsta, M.D.; Pakstis, L.; Pochan, D.J.; Deming, T.J. Stimuli-responsive polypeptide vesicles by conformation-specific assembly. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Holowka, E.P.; Pochan, D.J.; Deming, T.J. Charged polypeptide vesicles with controllable diameter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12423–12428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fatouros, D.G.; Lamprou, D.A.; Urquhart, A.J.; Yannopoulos, S.N.; Vizirianakis, I.S.; Zhang, S.; Koutsopoulos, S. Lipid-like self-assembling peptide nanovesicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014, 6, 8184–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghosh, S.; Singh, S.K.; Verma, S. Self-assembly and potassium ion triggered disruption of peptide-based soft structures. Chem. Commun. 2007, 14, 2296–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Liu, K.; Yan, L.Y.; Wang, A.H.; Bai, S.; Yan, X.H. Trace solvent as a predominant factor to tune dipeptide self-assembly. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Whitesides, G.M.; Grzybowski, B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 2002, 295, 2418–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lehn, J.M. Toward self-organization and complex matter. Science 2002, 295, 2400–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aida, T.; Meijer, E.W.; Stupp, S.I. Functional supramolecular polymers. Science 2012, 335, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Webber, M.J.; Appel, E.A.; Meijer, E.W.; Langer, R. Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Izadyar, M.; Khavania, M.; Housaindokhta, M.R. A combined molecular dynamic and quantum mechanic study of the solvent and guest molecule effect on the stability and length of heterocyclic peptide nanotubes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 11382–11391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hao, C.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, R.; Mei, S.; Yang, J.; Zhai, X.; Qiu, H. Design of folic acid based supramolecular hybrid gel with improved mechanical properties in NMP/H2O for dye adsorption. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 122, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hirst, A.R.; Smith, D.K. Solvent effects on supramolecular gel-phase materials: Two-component dendritic gel. Langmuir 2004, 20, 10851–10857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matthews, B.W. Solvent content of protein crystals. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 33, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gil, E.S.; Frankowski, D.J.; Bowman, M.K.; Gozen, A.O.; Hudson, S.M.; Spontak, R.J. Mixed protein blends composed of gelatin and bombyx mori silk fibroin: Effects of solvent-induced crystallization and composition. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, J.; Li, T.D.; Jiang, Q.W.; Qiao, C.D.; Cheng, J.Y. Microstructure transformation of PDMS-E grafted gelatin polymers induced by SDS and SDBS. Colloid Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 103, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamlet, M.J.; Taft, R.W. The solvatochromic comparison method. I. The β-scale of solvent hydrogen-bond acceptor (HBA) basicities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kricheldorf, H.R.; Lossow, C.V.; Schwarz, G. Cyclic polypeptides by solvent-induced polymerizations of α-amino acid N-carboxyanhydrides. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5513–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luo, S.C.; Craciun, V.; Douglas, E.P. Instabilities during the formation of electroactive polymer thin films. Langmuir 2005, 21, 2881–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choktaweesap, N.; Arayanarakul, K.; Aht-Ong, D.; Meechaisue, C.; Supaphol, P. Electrospun gelatin fibers: Effect of solvent system on morphology and fiber diameters. Polym. J. 2007, 39, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mason, T.O.; Chirgadze, D.Y.; Levin, A.; Adler-Abramovich, L.; Gazit, E.; Knowles, T.P.J.; Buell, A.K. Expanding the solvent chemical space for self-assembly of dipeptide nanostructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1243–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Korevaar, P.A.; Schaefer, C.; de Greef, T.F.A.; Meijer, E.W. Controlling chemical self-assembly by solvent-dependent dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1348, 134, 13482–13491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Deng, R.; Liang, F.; Qu, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Z. Diblock copolymer based janus nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, J.; Zhou, S.; Sun, Y.; Fang, X.; Wu, L. Fabrication, properties and applications of Janus particles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4356–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.L.; Qu, X.Z.; Liu, J.G.; Li, J.L.; Yang, Z.Z. Janus composite nanorings by combinational template synthesis and skiving micro-process. Polymer 2010, 51, 3606–3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Qu, X.Z.; Lia, J.; Yang, Z.Z. Janus hollow spheres by emulsion interfacial self-assembled sol-gel process. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1231–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hanania, Z.A.N.; Roos, Y.H.; Kerry, J.P. Use of beef, pork and fish gelatin sources in the manufacture of films and assessment of their composition and mechanical properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, S.; Ni, H.; Cao, S.; Wang, J. Cross-linked polyacrylonitrile/polyethyleneimine–polydimethylsiloxane composite membrane for solvent resistant nanofiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 106, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Dong, X.H.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yue, K.; Huang, M.; Liu, H.; Feng, X.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, W.; et al. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane meets “click” chemistry: Rational design and facile preparation of functional hybrid materials. Polymer 2017, 125, 303–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Z.; Fu, Y.; Li, Z.; Nan, N.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y. Forth flotation giant surfactants. Polymer 2019, 162, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mirsky, A.E.; Pauling, L. On the structure of native, denatured, and coagulated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1936, 22, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Privalov, P.L.; Kechinashvili, N.N. A thermodynamic approach to the problem of stabilization of globular protein structure: A calorimetric study. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 86, 665–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sow, L.C.; Toh, N.Z.Y.; Wong, C.W.; Yang, H. Combination of sodium alginate with tilapia fish gelatin for improved texture properties and nanostructure modification. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, F.N.; Deoliveira, D.B.; Trumble, W.R.; Sarkar, H.K.; Singh, B.R. Secondary structure estimation of proteins using the amide III region of fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Application to analyze calcium-binding-induced structural changes in calsequestrin. Appl. Spectrosc. 1994, 48, 1432–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Payne, K.J.; Veis, A. Fourier transform ir spectroscopy of collagen and gelatin solutions: Deconvolution of the amide I band for conformational studies. Biopolymers 1988, 27, 1749–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Byler, D.M.; Brouillette, J.N.; Susi, H. Quantitative studies of protein structure by FT-IR spectral deconvolution and curve fitting. Spectroscopy 1986, 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  41. Surewicz, W.K.; Moscarello, M.A.; Mantsch, H.H. Conformational properties of azurin in solution as determined from resolution-enhanced fourier-transform infrared spectra. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987, 167, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, W.; Wang, K.; Xiao, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, A. Performance of high amylose starch-composited gelatin filmsinfluenced by gelatinization and concentration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 94, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhu, P.L.; Yan, X.H.; Su, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.B. Solvent-induced structural transition of self-assembled dipeptide: From organogels to microcrystals. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3176–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xing, P.; Chu, X.; Li, S.; Ma, M.; Hao, A. Hybrid gels assembled from fmoc–amino acid and graphene oxide with controllable properties. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2377–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dasgupta, A.; Mondal, J.H.; Das, D. Peptide hydrogels. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 9117–9149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, Z.; Gu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, B. Small molecule hydrogels based on a class of antiinflammatory agents. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2, 208–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Estroff, L.A.; Hamilton, A.D. Water gelation by small organic molecules. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1201–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weng, W.; Li, Z.; Jamieson, A.M.; Rowan, S.J. Control of gel morphology and properties of a class of metallo-supramolecular polymers by good/poor solvent environments. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ka, D.; Seo, M.; Choi, H.; Kim, E.H.; Kim, S.Y. Physical gelation of polar aprotic solvents induced by hydrogen bonding modulation of polymeric molecules. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5722–5724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, Y.; Yang, H. Effects of calcium ion on gel properties and gelation of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) protein isolates processed with pH shift method. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Conversion degree of free −NH2 groups at 5% (w/w) gelatin with the increasing of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentration from 0 g L−1 to 3.5 g L−1. Data represent mean ± SD, N = 3.
Figure 1. Conversion degree of free −NH2 groups at 5% (w/w) gelatin with the increasing of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentration from 0 g L−1 to 3.5 g L−1. Data represent mean ± SD, N = 3.
Molecules 24 02264 g001
Figure 2. Morphologies of PGG when PGG solution was mixed with methanol (a,g), ethanol (b,h), isopropanol alcohol (c,i), acetone (d,j), THF (e,k), and 1,4-dioxane (f,l) at solution/solvent (v/v) ratios of 1:1 (af) and 1:2 (gl).
Figure 2. Morphologies of PGG when PGG solution was mixed with methanol (a,g), ethanol (b,h), isopropanol alcohol (c,i), acetone (d,j), THF (e,k), and 1,4-dioxane (f,l) at solution/solvent (v/v) ratios of 1:1 (af) and 1:2 (gl).
Molecules 24 02264 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of PGG when PGG solution was mixed with six organic solvents (PGG solution/solvent v/v = 1:1).
Figure 3. XRD patterns of PGG when PGG solution was mixed with six organic solvents (PGG solution/solvent v/v = 1:1).
Molecules 24 02264 g003
Figure 4. Friction resistance of pure pigskin (blank) and pigskin coated with PGG/acetone, PGG/ethanol, PGG, and casein, respectively, under wet and sweat conditions (a); friction experiment under dry conditions (b); casein and PGG coatings under UV radiation (c).
Figure 4. Friction resistance of pure pigskin (blank) and pigskin coated with PGG/acetone, PGG/ethanol, PGG, and casein, respectively, under wet and sweat conditions (a); friction experiment under dry conditions (b); casein and PGG coatings under UV radiation (c).
Molecules 24 02264 g004
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of Si 2p profiles for different coatings.
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of Si 2p profiles for different coatings.
Molecules 24 02264 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of gels formed in different solvents: (ae) Acetone was the solvent and PGG solution/solvent (v/v) ratio changed from 1:1 to 1:5; (fj) THF was the solvent and PGG solution/solvent (v/v) ratio changed from 1:1 to 1:5.
Figure 6. SEM images of gels formed in different solvents: (ae) Acetone was the solvent and PGG solution/solvent (v/v) ratio changed from 1:1 to 1:5; (fj) THF was the solvent and PGG solution/solvent (v/v) ratio changed from 1:1 to 1:5.
Molecules 24 02264 g006
Figure 7. Photos of gels formed in THF; the ratio of THF to water is 1:1 to 1:10 (v/v). The volume of mixed solution in every part was 2 mL.
Figure 7. Photos of gels formed in THF; the ratio of THF to water is 1:1 to 1:10 (v/v). The volume of mixed solution in every part was 2 mL.
Molecules 24 02264 g007
Table 1. Secondary structure content of epoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-E) grafted gelatin (PGG) after PGG solution was mixed with six organic solvents (PGG solution/solvent v/v = 1:1). Results are mean ± standard deviations of duplicate analysis. Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, N = 3).
Table 1. Secondary structure content of epoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-E) grafted gelatin (PGG) after PGG solution was mixed with six organic solvents (PGG solution/solvent v/v = 1:1). Results are mean ± standard deviations of duplicate analysis. Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, N = 3).
SolventsBlankMethanolEthanol2-PropanolAcetoneTetrahydrofuran1,4-Dioxane
α-Helix24.45 ± 0.18 b27.99 ± 0.16 a28.07 ± 0.31 a14.59 ± 0.42 d17.73 ± 0.08 c24.48 ± 0.11 b12.55 ± 0.34 e
β-Sheet31.31 ± 0.07 b26.55 ± 0.20 d21.50 ± 0.03 f29.83 ± 0.17 c33.54 ± 0.36 a30.18 ± 0.23 c24.79 ± 0.16 e
β-Turn17.50 ± 0.12 c11.34 ± 0.28 d18.71 ± 0.15 a18.33 ± 0.10 ab18.50 ± 0.29 ab17.95 ± 0.13 bc18.65 ± 0.22 ab
Random Coil26.73 ± 0.26 f33.86 ± 0.40 c31.73 ± 0.22 d37.24 ± 0.06 b30.21 ± 0.15 e27.39 ± 0.17 f44.01 ± 0.31 a
α-Helix+β-Sheet55.76 ± 0.24 a54.54 ± 0.33 a49.57 ± 0.29 c44.42 ± 0.45 d51.27 ± 0.40 b54.66 ± 0.30 a37.34 ± 0.49 e
Helix/Coil0.91 ± 0.27 a0.83 ± 0.16 ab0.88 ± 0.06 a0.39 ± 0.17 ab0.59 ± 0.07 ab0.89 ± 0.18 a0.29 ± 0.02 b
Table 2. XPS Elemental Analyses of different coatings. Results are mean ± standard deviations of duplicate analysis. Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, N = 3).
Table 2. XPS Elemental Analyses of different coatings. Results are mean ± standard deviations of duplicate analysis. Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05, N = 3).
CoatingSi 2p (%)
PGG coating19.52 ± 0.19 b
PGG/acetone(1:1) coating20.56 ± 0.28 a
PGG/acetone(1:2) coating20.90 ± 0.22 a
PGG/THF(1:1) coating20.34 ± 0.16 a
PGG/THF(1:2) coating18.85 ± 0.21 b
PGG/ethanol(1:1) coating18.04 ± 0.13 c

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Ma, H.; Xu, J.; Li, T.; Cai, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Dong, H. Induced Aggregation of Epoxy Polysiloxane Grafted Gelatin by Organic Solvent and Green Application. Molecules 2019, 24, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24122264

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Zhang D, Ma H, Xu J, Li T, Cai Z, Chen H, Zhang J, Dong H. Induced Aggregation of Epoxy Polysiloxane Grafted Gelatin by Organic Solvent and Green Application. Molecules. 2019; 24(12):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24122264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhen, Dongmei Zhang, Huijun Ma, Jing Xu, Tianduo Li, Zhaoning Cai, Haifeng Chen, Jinghui Zhang, and Hao Dong. 2019. "Induced Aggregation of Epoxy Polysiloxane Grafted Gelatin by Organic Solvent and Green Application" Molecules 24, no. 12: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24122264

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop