Next Article in Journal
Hydrothermal Conversion of Giant Reed to Furfural and Levulinic Acid: Optimization of the Process under Microwave Irradiation and Investigation of Distinctive Agronomic Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Characteristics in Meal of Black Rapeseed and Yellow-Seeded Progeny of Brassica napus–Sinapis alba Hybrids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules201219758
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Global Transcriptome Using Illumina Paired-End Sequencing and Development of EST-SSR Markers in Two Species of Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae)

by
Yue-Mei Zhao
1,2,
Tao Zhou
1,
Zhong-Hu Li
1 and
Gui-Fang Zhao
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, 229 Taibai Bei Road, Xi’an 710069, China
2
College of Biopharmaceutical and Food Engineering, Shangluo University, Beixin Street, Shangluo 726000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(12), 21214-21231; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219758
Submission received: 8 October 2015 / Revised: 5 November 2015 / Accepted: 9 November 2015 / Published: 30 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Diversity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gynostemma pentaphyllum is an important medicinal herb of the Cucurbitaceae family, but limited genomic data have hindered genetic studies. In this study, transcriptomes of two closely-related Gynostemma species, Gynostemma cardiospermum and G. pentaphyllum, were sequenced using Illumina paired-end sequencing technology. A total of 71,607 nonredundant unigenes were assembled. Of these unigenes, 60.45% (43,288) were annotated based on sequence similarity search with known proteins. A total of 11,059 unigenes were identified in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Pathway (KEGG) database. A total of 3891 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected in 3526 nonredundant unigenes, 2596 primer pairs were designed and 360 of them were randomly selected for validation. Of these, 268 primer pairs yielded clear products among six G. pentaphyllum samples. Thirty polymorphic SSR markers were used to test polymorphism and transferability in Gynostemma. Finally, 15 SSR makers that amplified in all 12 Gynostemma species were used to assess genetic diversity. Our results generated a comprehensive sequence resource for Gynostemma research.

1. Introduction

Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae), is a genus of perennial creeping herbs with both sexual reproduction and clonal growth by rhizomes or bulbils [1]. This genus has around 16 species and two varieties, distributed in forests, scrubs and bush habitats at 60–3200 m elevations throughout China, India, Myanmar, Korea and Japan [2]. Drainage areas of the Yangtze River in Southwest China’s Yunnan Province are thought to be the modern distribution center of this genus. Gynostemma can be divided into two subgenera (Gynostemma and Triostellum) according to different fruit morphology [2]. In recent years, Gynostemma has been attracting attention since they contain saponins, amino acids, and reducing sugars, which could be commercially useful. For example, Gynostemma pentaphyllum, widespread as a traditional Chinese medicinal herb, is thought to inhibit tumor cell growth, anti-ulceration and to enhance immunity [3,4]. Approximately 84 dammarane-type saponin glycosides were found in G. pentaphyllum [5], some of them have structural similarities to glycosides found in Panax ginseng C.A. Mey [6], but different saponin contents were observed in various other species of Gynostemma [7]. Natural populations of Gynostemma were destroyed in recent years due to excessive harvesting, especially G. pentaphyllum, which has been listed as a Grade II Key Protected Wild Plant Species by the Chinese Government [8]. It is necessary to preserve natural stocks of Gynostemma spp., and assess their genetic diversity and differentiation. Molecular genetic research of Gynostemma is limited [9] because most studies have mainly focused on extracting bioactive components [5,10,11,12,13]. Subramaniyam et al. (2011) [14] reported de novo transcriptome assembly of G. pentaphyllum with Roche platforms using the materials of leaves and roots, but the research focused on the identification of secondary metabolite genes. So far, only 14 genomic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 14 inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) have been exploited in Gynostemma [15,16]. Thus, more markers are needed to better understand the genetic diversity and to develop conservation strategies for Gynostemma.
SSR markers have turned out to be an effective tool for germplasm characterization and genetic diversity studies. SSRs can be divided into two categories based on the original sequences used for development of SSRs: genomic SSRs and expressed sequence tag (EST)-SSRs. Developing genomic SSR markers from random genomic sequences is labor, money and time intensive [17,18]. On the contrary, EST-SSRs identified from transcribed RNA sequences are more conserved than noncoding sequences. EST-SSRs are becoming more and more widespread, not only because they are potentially linked with particular transcriptional regions that contribute to agronomic phenotypes [19,20], but also because they have high transferability among closely-related species [21,22,23,24,25,26]. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it has become possible to generate large numbers of transcriptomic datasets for nonmodel organisms [27] using various platforms such as Roche 454, Illumina HiSeq, and Applied Biosystems SOLiD. Obtaining large numbers of valuable EST sequences via NGS is important for gene annotation and discovery [28,29], comparative genomics [30], development of molecular markers [31,32], and population genomics studies of genetic variation linked to adaptive traits [33]. Recently, an increasing number of EST datasets have become available for model and non-model organisms, but only a limited number of Gynostemma EST sequences are available in the public database.
In this study, we describe the generation, de novo assembly, and annotation of a transcriptome-derived EST dataset using Illumina paired-end sequencing technology from two Gynostemma species, G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum. In addition, we mined and validated a large set of EST-SSR markers and investigated the genetic relationship among 12 selected species. This EST datasets will serve as a valuable genomic resource for further studies in Gynostemma, e.g., novel gene discovery and marker-assisted selective breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Assembly of Gynostemma Transcriptome Data from Illumina Sequencing

After stringent quality assessment and data filtering, Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 sequencing generated 43,175,448 high-quality reads for Gynostemma pentaphyllum and 52,782,146 high-quality reads for Gynostemma cardiospermum, respectively. The raw data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRA305674. Using the Trinity assembler software [34], short-read sequences from G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum were assembled de novo into 1,488,035 contigs and 1,911,378 contigs, respectively. Transcriptome reads and assembled contigs information for two Gynostemma species are shown in Table 1. The frequency distribution of contigs length from these two Gynostemma species showed little difference, except for 100–200 bp, which showed more contigs in G. cardiospermum (Figure 1). Using paired end-joining, gap-filling, and Trinity, these contigs were assembled into scaffolds which were further assembled into unigenes. Finally, we obtained 40,257 and 44,000 unigenes from G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum, respectively (Table 2). In addition, we obtained a nonredundant set of unigene sequences by pooling contigs from the two species and assembling them together into 71,607 unigenes. As shown in Table 2, the 71,607 nonredundant unigenes were used for in silico mining and validation of genic-SSR markers. Among the combined 71,607 nonredundant sequences, there were 51,250 (71.57%) that ranged from 200 to 1000 bp, 12,852 (17.95%) from 1000 to 2000 bp, and 7505 (10.48%) greater than 2000 bp.
Table
Table 1. Transcriptome reads and assembled contigs information for two Gynostemma species.
Table 1. Transcriptome reads and assembled contigs information for two Gynostemma species.
SpeciesTotal ReadsTotal Clean Nucleotides (Nt)Q30 PercentageGC PercentageTotal Number of ContigsTotal Length of Contigs (Nt)N50 of ContigsMean (Nt)
G. pentaphyllum43,175,4484,360,277,19180.16%43.55%1,488,035110,745,9987174
G. cardiospermum52,782,1465,330,256,14882.69%44.00%1,911,378136,726,6516671
Table
Table 2. Summary of the unigenes from two Gynostemma species.
Table 2. Summary of the unigenes from two Gynostemma species.
Unigene SourceTotal Number of UnigenesTotal Length of Unigenes (Nt)Mean Length of Unigenes (Nt)N50 of Unigenes
G. pentaphyllum40,25735,161,843873.431516
G. cardiospermum44,00037,234,004846.231504
All71,60761,367,129857.001535
Molecules 20 19758 g001 550
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the contig sizes from two Gynostemma species. The frequency distribution of contig sizes resulting from Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 sequencing, as assembled using Trinity.
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the contig sizes from two Gynostemma species. The frequency distribution of contig sizes resulting from Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 sequencing, as assembled using Trinity.
Molecules 20 19758 g001

2.2. Functional Annotation and Classification

A homology-based approach was conducted for validation and annotation of assembled unigenes. Among 71,607 unigenes, 60.28% (43,167) showed homology in the nonredundant (nr) database, and 46.04% (32,970) unigenes had BLAST hits in Swiss-Prot database. A total of 60.45% (43,288) unigenes were successfully annotated in the nr and/or Swiss-Prot databases. Additionally, 97.73% (19,895 of 20,357) of the unigenes over 1000 bp in length showed homologous matches, whereas only 32.33% (6619 of 20,474) of the unigenes shorter than 300 bp showed matches (Figure 2). The unigenes homologous to known protein sequences in nr database were further assigned to gene ontology (GO) terms using Blast2GO. A total of 35,968 unigenes were assigned to 549,570 GO term annotations, which belonged to biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components clusters (Figure 3). Among biological processes, “cellular process” was the most dominant group, followed by “metabolic process”, “response to stimulus”, and “biological regulation”. Regarding the molecular functions category, the major GO terms were “binding” and “catalytic activity”. Under the cellular components category, “cell part” and “cell” represented the most abundant classification, followed by “organelle” and “organelle part”. All unigenes were searched against the COG database to predict possible functions and phylogenetically classify orthologous gene products. Out of 43,167 nr hits, 20,585 sequences were assigned to one or more COG classifications (Figure 4). Among the 25 COG categories, the cluster for “general function prediction” was the largest group, followed by “translation ribosomal structure and biogenesis”, “replication, recombination and repair”, and “posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones”. In contrast, only a few unigenes were assigned to “nuclear structure and extracellular structure”. According to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, 11,059 unigenes were identified with pathway annotation and were assigned to 117 KEGG pathways (Table S1). The top 20 pathways, including 5443 unigenes, are listed in Figure 5. The most highly represented pathways were “Ribosome”, followed by “Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum” and “Plant hormone signal transduction”. Being important medicinal plants used in China, previous research on Gynostemma spp. has mostly focused on saponins biosynthesis pathways. As expected, some key genes encoding enzymes related to the synthesis of triterpene compounds, which are important components of saponins, were revealed in metabolism pathway. For example, the genes involved in mevalonate (MVA) and 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathways were identified in our study (Table 3) and these genes may provide valuable resources for research on gynosaponin biosynthesis.
Molecules 20 19758 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of unigene length between hit and not-hit unigenes. Longer unigenes were more likely to have BLAST matches in protein databases.
Figure 2. Comparison of unigene length between hit and not-hit unigenes. Longer unigenes were more likely to have BLAST matches in protein databases.
Molecules 20 19758 g002
Molecules 20 19758 g003 550
Figure 3. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes. The results are summarized in three main categories: Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function. In total, 35,968 unigenes with BLAST matches to known proteins were assigned to gene ontology terms.
Figure 3. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes. The results are summarized in three main categories: Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function. In total, 35,968 unigenes with BLAST matches to known proteins were assigned to gene ontology terms.
Molecules 20 19758 g003
Molecules 20 19758 g004 550
Figure 4. Histogram presentation of clusters of orthologous groups (COG). In total, 20,585 sequences were assigned to 25 COG classifications.
Figure 4. Histogram presentation of clusters of orthologous groups (COG). In total, 20,585 sequences were assigned to 25 COG classifications.
Molecules 20 19758 g004
Molecules 20 19758 g005 550
Figure 5. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) classification of unigenes. 5,443 unigenes were assigned to the top 20 pathways in KEGG.
Figure 5. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) classification of unigenes. 5,443 unigenes were assigned to the top 20 pathways in KEGG.
Molecules 20 19758 g005
Table
Table 3. List of triterpene saponin biosynthesis-related genes in the Gynostemma transcriptome.
Table 3. List of triterpene saponin biosynthesis-related genes in the Gynostemma transcriptome.
Gene IDLengthKO IDAnnotation
T3_Unigene_BMK.235402373K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T3_Unigene_BMK.259902720K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T3_Unigene_BMK.37882301K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T4_Unigene_BMK.237192489K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T4_Unigene_BMK.307933057K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T4_Unigene_BMK.331822483K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
CL10430Contig12754K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
T3_Unigene_BMK.156652671K016621-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase, (EC:2.2.1.7)
CL9143Contig11586K009194-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol kinase, (EC:2.7.1.148)
T3_Unigene_BMK.22099359K035264-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl diphosphate synthase, (EC:1.17.7.1)
T3_Unigene_BMK.28355906K035274-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase, (EC:1.17.1.2)
CL12440Contig1616K035271-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase, (EC:1.17.1.2)
T3_Unigene_BMK.9388411K035271-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase, (EC:1.17.1.2)
CL12699Contig11973K01823isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase, (EC:5.3.3.2)
T4_Unigene_BMK.25472575K01823isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase, (EC:5.3.3.2)
CL7433Contig1750K01823isopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase, (EC:5.3.3.2)
T3_Unigene_BMK.210001177K13789geranyl geranyl pyrophosphate synthase, (EC:2.5.1.29)
T4_Unigene_BMK.205251569K14066geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase, (EC:2.5.1.30)
T3_Unigene_BMK.189961754K14066geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase, (EC:2.5.1.30)
T3_Unigene_BMK.35842305K00626acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial, (EC:2.3.1.9)
T3_Unigene_BMK.35857278K00626acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial, (EC:2.3.1.9)
T4_Unigene_BMK.233491785K00626acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, (EC:2.3.1.9)
T3_Unigene_BMK.185691657K00626acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase, (EC:2.3.1.9)
CL11048Contig12014K01641hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, (EC:2.3.3.10)
T3_Unigene_BMK.2712475K00021hmg-CoA reductase, (EC:1.1.1.34)
CL14352Contig12368K00021hmg-CoA reductase, (EC:1.1.1.34)
T4_Unigene_BMK.286061468K00021hmg-CoA reductase, (EC:1.1.1.34)
T4_Unigene_BMK.28692322K00021hmg-CoA reductase, (EC:1.1.1.34)
T3_Unigene_BMK.22340296K00021hmg-CoA reductase, (EC:1.1.1.34)
T3_Unigene_BMK.3271467K00869mevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.1.36)
CL13115Contig1526K00869mevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.1.36)
T4_Unigene_BMK.231481576K00869mevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.1.36)
T4_Unigene_BMK.26974522K00869mevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.1.36)
T3_Unigene_BMK.144741691K00869mevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.1.36)
T3_Unigene_BMK.220241903K00938Phosphomevalonate kinase, (EC:2.7.4.2)
T4_Unigene_BMK.293272282K01597diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, (EC:4.1.1.33)
T3_Unigene_BMK.158641831K01597diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, (EC:4.1.1.33)
T3_Unigene_BMK.5322215K11778undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthetase, (EC:2.5.1.31)
T4_Unigene_BMK.331831237K11778undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthetase, (EC:2.5.1.31)
T4_Unigene_BMK.214281774K00801farnesyl-diphosphate farnesyltransferase, (EC:2.5.1.21)
T3_Unigene_BMK.3061271K00511Squalene monooxygenase, (EC:1.14.99.7)
CL1336Contig12048K00511Squalene monooxygenase, (EC:1.14.99.7)
KO: KEGG Orthology.

2.3. Frequency and Distribution of Different Types of SSR Markers

A total of 3891 SSR loci were identified from 3526 nonredundant unigenes, representing 4.92% of the total 71,607 unigenes. The distribution density was one SSR locus per 15.78 kb. This study excluded mononucleotide repeats and complex SSRs. There were 329 unigenes with more than one SSR locus. The most frequent repeat unit in nonredundant unigenes were trinucleotides followed by dinucleotides (Figure 6A); and di- and tri-nucleotide repeats constituted 3778 (97.10%) of the identified SSR loci. The number of reiterations of a given repeat unit ranged from five to 12 and SSRs with five reiterations were the most abundant (Figure 6B). The majority of the SSR sequences were from 12 to 21 bp in length, accounting for 96.53% (3756) of the total identified SSR loci; SSR loci with a length of 15 bp were the most frequent. The longest SSR locus was 30 bp (Figure 6C). More details about different repeat motif of di- and trinucleotide repeats in EST-SSRs are listed in Table 4. The dominant di- and tri-nucleotide repeat motif in SSRs were AG/CT and AAG/CTT respectively. There was only one CG/CG repeat motif and very few ACT/AGT repeats in our results (Table 4).
Molecules 20 19758 g006 550
Figure 6. Frequency distribution of the Gynostemma expressed sequence tag (EST)-SSRs of different sizes. (A) Unit size; (B) Number of repeats; (C) SSR locus length.
Figure 6. Frequency distribution of the Gynostemma expressed sequence tag (EST)-SSRs of different sizes. (A) Unit size; (B) Number of repeats; (C) SSR locus length.
Molecules 20 19758 g006
Table
Table 4. Frequency distribution of the di- and tri-nucleotide repeat motifs in the Gynostemma.
Table 4. Frequency distribution of the di- and tri-nucleotide repeat motifs in the Gynostemma.
Serial No.Repeat MotifNumber of Reiterations of the MotifTotal
56789101112
1AG/CT#4562852171891928131423
2AAG/CTT576358137600001077
3ATC/ATG159742500000258
4AT/AT#955436181421220
5AAT/ATT97501920000168
6AGG/CCT90411210000144
7AGC/CTG8324910000117
8ACC/GGT523261000091
9AAC/GTT4924142000089
13CCG/CGG491730000069
10AC/GT#281710430163
11ACG/CGT241000000034
12ACT/AGT15522000024
14CG/CG010000001
15Other motifs *9518000000113
Total128912335832782112098353891
Note: * indicated tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs in our study; # means that this item was not considered when detecting EST-SSRs.

2.4. Development, Validation and Transferability of SSR Markers

To further evaluate the assembly quality, 2586 primer pairs (Table S2) were designed using Primer 3.0 based on 3891 SSR loci generated from MISA. Primer pairs for the remaining 1305 SSR loci could not be designed successfully because their flanking sequences were either too short or the nature of sequences did not satisfy the criteria of BatchPrimer3 v 1.0 software. All 2586 unigene sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis to predict the likely function of these EST-SSRs. There were 2559 transcriptome sequences that showed homology to functional loci of other plants (Table S2). From the 2586 primer pairs, 360 (Table S3) were randomly selected for validation using DNA from the six samples of G. pentaphyllum of three different populations. Among the 360 primer pairs, 268 were successfully amplified via PCR. The remaining 92 primer pairs failed to generate PCR products, even when the annealing temperature was reduced by 8 °C. Of the 268 working primer pairs, 239 amplified products of the expected size including 23 monomorphic loci and 216 polymorphic loci among six genotypes of G. pentaphyllum. The other 29 generated larger products than the expected size, suggesting that there may exist introns in the amplifying regions. To test interspecies transferability across 12 related species (26 individuals) in the genus Gynostemma, 30 SSR pairs were selected from the 216 microsatellites that produce polymorphic size fragments. Of the 30 polymorphic SSRs, 15 primer pairs could amplify PCR products and show polymorphic fragments from all 12 Gynostemma species (Table 5 and Table 6). Four pairs of primers (G-EST-SSR93, G-EST-SSR29, G-EST-SSR55, and G-EST-SSR31) failed to produce PCR fragments in Gynostemma laxiflorum; five pairs (G-EST-SSR85, G-EST-SSR42, G-EST-SSR54, G-EST-SSR59, and G-EST-SSR51) failed to produce PCR fragments in Gynostemma caulopterum; one pair of primers (G-EST-SSR14) failed to produce PCR fragments in Gynostemma laxum and G. caulopterum; one pair of primers (G-EST-SSR7) failed to produce PCR fragments in Gynostemma pubescens, G. laxum, G. caulopterum, and G. laxiflorum; one pair of primers (G-EST-SSR62) failed to produce PCR fragments in Gynostemma microspermum, G. pubescens, G. laxum, G. laxiflorum, and G. caulopterum; and three pairs of primers (G-EST-SSR158, G-EST-SSR92, and G-EST-SSR3) failed to produce PCR fragments in G. laxum. The cross-species amplification of these 30 EST-SSRs developed from G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum in 10 additional Gynostemma species (G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum were not considered when calculating the transferability of the EST-SSRs) was 92.33% in 300 combinations tested (30 SSRs × 10 species).
Table
Table 5. Details of 15 genic-SSR loci showing polymorphism among 12 Gynostemma species.
Table 5. Details of 15 genic-SSR loci showing polymorphism among 12 Gynostemma species.
Primer NameBase on Sequence IDSSRsEPS (bp)OPS (bp)AllelesPIC
G-EST-SSR19CL10682Contig1(AT)6149149–16150.67
G-EST-SSR20CL10765Contig1(GAA)5151148–16380.82
G-EST-SSR40CL11560Contig1(TCT)5151151–16040.68
G-EST-SSR44CL13255Contig1(AG)6164162–196110.87
G-EST-SSR47CL13343Contig1(TCT)6148151–17280.79
G-EST-SSR57CL14153Contig1(TGA)5149152–17060.74
G-EST-SSR75CL400Contig1(TCA)6172172–20270.80
G-EST-SSR76CL435Contig1(TCT)5131122–13760.76
G-EST-SSR89CL1983Contig1(GAAA)5146146–16660.79
G-EST-SSR100CL2782Contig1(GAA)6145136–16390.79
G-EST-SSR118CL8580Contig1(CGG)5141138–15360.62
G-EST-SSR131CL9957Contig1(TCT)5149149–15850.55
G-EST-SSR140CL10320Contig1(CTA)6158158–17060.73
G-EST-SSR306CL11525Contig1(CT)7169169–18960.73
G-EST-SSR316CL12699Contig1(GAA)5135135–15980.66
Mean---6.730.73
EPS: expected product size; OPS: observed product size.
Table
Table 6. The 26 individual plants (belonging to 12 species) used for validation and the genetic diversity study.
Table 6. The 26 individual plants (belonging to 12 species) used for validation and the genetic diversity study.
No.SpeciesLocality, ProvinceLatitude (N), longitude (E)Characteristics
1G. pentaphyllumAnkang, Shaanxi32°25′N,109°04′Ewild
2G. pentaphyllumAnkang, Shaanxi32°25′N,109°04′ECultivar
3G. pentaphyllumKunming, Yunnan25°14′N,102°49′EWild
4G. pentaphyllumKunming, Yunnan25°14′N,102°49′ECultivar
5G. pentaphyllumPanzhihua, Sichuan26°36′N,101°43′EWild
6G. pentaphyllumPanzhihua, Sichuan26°36′N,101°43′ECultivar
7G. burmanicum var. molleDehong, Yunnan24°48′N, 98°17′EWild
8G. burmanicumMenghai, Yunnan22°02′N, 100°22′EWild
9G. burmanicumDehong, Yunnan24°36′N, 97°39′EWild
10G.pentaphyllum var. dasycarpumMengla, Yunnan22°14′N, 101°15′EWild
11G. pentaphyllum var. dasycarpumJinghong, Yunnan,22°01′N, 100°45′EWild
12G. longipesXuancheng, Anhui30°55′N,118°46′EWild
13G. longipesAnkang, Shaanxi32°25′N,109°22′EWild
14G. longipesEnshi, Hubei30°03′N, 109°49′EWild
15G. longipesZhaotong, Yunnan27°43′N,103°54′EWild
16G. pubescensMenghai, Yunnan21°56′N, 100°36′EWild
17G. pubescensMenglun, Yunnan21°56′N, 101°14′EWild
18G. pubescensYingjiang, Yunnan24°42′N, 97°55′EWild
19G. pubescensEnshi, Hubei30°18′N, 109°31′EWild
20G. laxumJiujiang, Jiangxi,29°17′N, 115°07′EWild
21G. microspermumPu’er, Yunnan23°07′N, 100°22′EWild
22G. laxiflorumXuancheng, Anhui30°41′N,118°39′EWild
23G. yixingenseTongling, Anhui30°57′N,117°48′EWild
24G. caulopterumRenhuai, Guizhou27°48′N, 106°26′EWild
25G. cardiospermumAnkang, Shaanxi32°13′N,109°01′EWild
26G. cardiospermumAnkang, Shaanxi32°13′N,109°01′EWild

2.5. Genetic Diversity and Relatedness in the Genus Gynostemma

The 15 primer pairs that yielded clear, highly polymorphic bands from all Gynostemma species were used to assess the genetic diversity in a set of 26 individual plants representing 12 species of Gynostemma (Table 5 and Table 6). A total of 101 alleles were identified, the number of alleles per locus ranged from four to 11 with an average of 6.73 alleles. Polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.55 to 0.87 with an average of 0.73, suggesting that the developed EST-SSRs were highly polymorphic. A phenogram based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficients was constructed to resolve the relationship of 26 individuals from 12 species (Figure 7), which showed two distinct clusters at a cut-off similarity index of 0.71. Cluster I contained seven species, which corresponded to subgen. Gynostemma, and was divided into five sub-clusters: Ia, Ib, Ic, Id and Ie, at a cut-off similarity index of 0.78; Sub-cluster Ia comprised six G. pentaphyllum genotypes (three wild and three cultivar genotypes); Sub-cluster Ib comprised four G. pubescens from four populations and one G. laxum; Sub-cluster Ic comprised four G. longipes from four populations and one G. burmanicum var. molle; Sub-cluster Id comprised two G. burmanicum from two populations; and Sub-cluster Ie comprised two G. pentaphyllum var. dasycarpum from Jinghong and Mengla locations, respectively. Cluster II included five species that corresponded to subgen. Triostellum, and was divided into two sub-clusters, IIa and IIb, at a cut-off similarity index of 0.79. Sub-cluster IIa comprised one G. microspermum, one G. laxiflorum and one G. caulopterum, and Sub-cluster IIb comprised one G. yixingense and two G. cardiospermum individuals.
Molecules 20 19758 g007 550
Figure 7. Genetic relationships among Gynostemma species based on EST-SSR markers. Genetic relationships among 26 individual plants. The scale at the bottom of the dendrogram indicates the level of similarity between the genotypes. Bootstrap values (>50) were labeled on the branches from 1000 re-samplings.
Figure 7. Genetic relationships among Gynostemma species based on EST-SSR markers. Genetic relationships among 26 individual plants. The scale at the bottom of the dendrogram indicates the level of similarity between the genotypes. Bootstrap values (>50) were labeled on the branches from 1000 re-samplings.
Molecules 20 19758 g007

3. Discussion

3.1. Functional Annotation of Unigenes

Presently, most research concentrate on isolating bioactive components from Gynostemma spp., but the potential molecular mechanisms producing such compounds is still unclear. Transcriptome sequencing is an effective method for novel gene discovery and SSR marker development. In this study, 71,607 nonredundant unigenes were obtained after assembly. In total, 60.45% (43,288) of all unigenes had homologs in the NCBI nr or Swiss-Prot protein databases, which was lower than that reported by Subramaniyam et al. [14] with leaves and roots as sequencing materials in Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Compared with other plants used in Chinese medicine, this was higher than Epimedium sagittatum [35], but lower than Panax quinquefolius [36] and Panax notoginseng [37]. Among the 43,288 unigenes with BLAST matches in the NCBI nr or Swiss-Prot protein database, 97.73% were over 1000 bp, whereas unigenes shorter than 300 bp in length only accounted for 32.33% of the total. Therefore, we infer that the large proportion of BLAST matches in Gynostemma was probably due to the large number of long sequences in our unigene database, which was also validated in other plants [38,39,40]. Perhaps the lack of a characterized protein domain, a common feature of the shorter unigene sequences, was the cause of the small number of shorter sequences showing BLAST hits in the protein databases. Further research with GO analysis revealed that most genes are involved in many biological processes in Gynostemma. Many genes were assigned to “metabolic process” and “catalytic activity” classes, which suggest a great deal of enzymes involved in primary and secondary metabolism. Among the KEGG pathways, the well-represented pathways discovered in our study were “Ribosome”, “Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum” and “Plant hormone signal transduction”. Furthermore, some key genes involved in the biosynthesis of terpenoids were identified, several of which were found in other species [36,37]. Compared with the transcriptome of leaves and roots, genes related to biosynthesis of terpenoids showed little difference. For instance, 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl diphosphate synthase (EC: 1.17.7.1), farnesyl-diphosphate farnesyltransferase (EC: 2.5.1.21) and Squalene monooxygenase (EC: 1.14.99.7), which were found in our study, were not presented in the results of Subramaniyam et al. [14]. Likewise, the genes present in results of Subramaniyam et al. [14], Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (EC: 1.1.1.88), Geranyl transtransferase (EC: 2.5.1.10), Dimethylallyltranstransferase (EC: 2.5.1.1), etc., did not appear in our study either. These results reflect that there might exist different transcriptomic signatures in different tissues. Some unigenes without BLASTx hits may be potential Gynostemma-specific genes. Both of these classes can provide valuable information for the further study of Gynostemma spp., such as novel gene discovery and cloning, functional studies, and metabolic engineering of enzymes.

3.2. SSR Marker Frequency and Distribution in Gynostemma Transcriptome

Polymorphic SSRs play an important role in genetic diversity research, genetic mapping studies, comparative genomics, and marker-assisted selection breeding [41]. Transcriptomics provides a rich source for SSR discovery because it generates plenty of sequences. A total of 3891 SSRs greater than 12 bp in length were identified from 3526 nonredundant unigenes, 4.92% of the total 71,607 unigenes possessed SSRs. It is obvious that the SSR frequency detected in Gynostemma is in accordance with the range of frequencies (2.65%–16.82%) reported before for other dicotyledonous species [42]. Several factors affect the EST-SSR frequency. First, the criteria for calling microsatellites is the most important factor of EST-SSR frequency, e.g., the repeat length threshold and the number of repeat motifs. Most studies have excluded the mononucleotide repeat motifs because they may result from sequencing errors. Some studies take three-repeat units into account when calculating the number of dinucleotide repeat units [40], while others do not [43,44,45]. In addition, we identified SSRs primarily from unigenes over 1000 bp, which may reduce the frequency to a certain degree. Secondly, genome structure or composition could also influence SSR frequency [46]. For example, it is reported that the small genome size of rice was the cause of the high frequency of EST-SSR sequences [47]. Finally, the different software used to detect SSR loci can also affect the SSR frequency.
Theoretically, the frequency of di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats should be in turn decreased according to the relative probability of replication slippage events [48]. The most abundant type of repeat motif among the Gynostemma unigenes analyzed was trinucleotide (Figure 6A). This finding is consistent with the earlier results reported before [22,35,45,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], which showed the trinucleotide motif is the most frequent repeat type. Some studies point out the reason for the high frequency of tri-nucleotide SSRs is that the selection against frameshift mutations might limit the expansion of other SSR types [43,55,56,57]. Meanwhile, other studies show that the most abundant class of SSRs was dinucleotide [38,39,42,58,59]. There are also some plant species showing approximately equal proportions of dinucleotide and tri-nucleotide repeats in their transcriptome sequences, e.g., Aspidistra saxicola [44], sweet potato [39], and oak [60]. The most frequent repeats of di- and tri-nucleotide were AG/CT and AAG/CTT, respectively, which was in accordance with the reports in sesame [38], oil palm [61], sweet potato [39], Primula [62], and Nothofagus nervosa [63].

3.3. Transferability of SSR Markers and Genetic Relationships among Different Species of Gynostemma

In this study, 3891 SSR markers were developed and 360 primer pairs were randomly selected to evaluate the assembly quality of reads and validity of markers in Gynostemma. In total, 268 primer pairs (74.44%) yielded clear fragments among six G. pentaphyllum genotypes. This result matches the 60%–90% success rate reported before. In total, 216 Polymorphic EST-SSR markers were obtained with a polymorphic proportion of 90.38%, which was similar to Amorphophallus [26], but was higher than other plants [20,21,52]. Our results suggest that the transcriptome assembly was reliable, and that the EST-SSR markers are usable across 12 species in the genus Gynostemma. The observed number of alleles ranged from four to 11 with an average of 6.73, indicating the potential application of these primer pairs. In the present study, EST-SSRs derived from G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum had a higher transferability rate, which was also observed in other plant taxa [22,25,26,35,64]. It has been proposed that the high transferability rate of EST-SSRs might be due to several factors: (1) the EST-SSRs derived from transcriptome database are conservative when compared with genomic SSRs [65,66]; (2) the more consistent efficiency of amplification of EST-SSRs enhances cross-species transferability [67,68]; and (3) closely-related species benefit from a high SSR transferability rate [26]. However, at the same time, [49] explained that the limitation on the interspecific transfer of SSR markers is caused by homoplasy of band sizes and complex mutational events. The genetic relationship among 26 individuals representing 12 species of Gynostemma based on 15 polymorphic SSR loci was clearly shown in dendrogram graph. Two major groups representing subgen. Gynostemma and subgen. Triostellum respectively were identified at a cut-off similarity index of 0.71, the level of genetic similarity was 0.70–1.00, indicating relatively high resolution power and potential utility of polymorphic SSR markers in phylogenetics of Gynostemma. As expected, the six G. pentaphyllum individuals were classified into three groups, and wild individuals were clustered with cultivated individuals from the same population. The variation between populations was higher than the other Gynostemma species, implying that G. pentaphyllum, as a widespread species, has a high level of genetic diversity. These results are concordant with previous reports [69]. Therefore, the potential EST-SSRs identified in this study will be an effective tool for germplasm polymorphism assessment or quantitative trait loci mapping in Gynostemma.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Young leaves, flowers and immature seeds from two species in the genus Gynostemma (G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum) were used for RNA extraction and transcriptome sequencing. DNA from 26 individual plants collected from southeast China was used to validate SSR markers and diversity analysis. Detailed information for the plant materials is listed in Table 6.

4.2. RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription and Sequencing

G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum were collected from two locations of Ankang in Shaanxi province during July 2013 (G. pentaphyllum: 32°25′N, 109°04′E; G. cardiospermum: 32°13′N, 109°01′E), the multiple individual plants mixture including leaves, stems, flowers, shoot tips and developing seeds for each species were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70 °C. After mixing an approximately equal weight of mixture for each species, total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions, then poly-A mRNA was isolated from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The quantity and quality of RNA were assessed by gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry. Purified RNA was used to construct a directional cDNA library using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Illumina), and then the cDNA library was sequenced using a HiSeq 2000 (Illumina) to obtain short sequences.

4.3. Transcript Assembly and Analysis

All raw reads from the two Gynostemma species were prescreened to remove adapter sequences, reads with greater than 10% unknown bases, and reads with an average base quality less than 30. High-quality filtered transcriptome reads were assembled into contigs by de novo assembly using Trinity tools [34]. A nonredundant set of unigene sequences was then created using paired-end reads by further alignments of the contigs from each species. To annotate them, all unigenes were searched against NCBI’s nonredundant protein (nr) database and Swiss-Prot protein databases using BLASTx with an E-value <10−5. The Blast2GO program [70] was used to get Gene Ontology (GO) terms to describe gene products according to three ontologies: molecular function, biological process and cellular component [71]. The unigene sequences were also aligned to the COG database to predict and classify functions. To further understand the biological functions and interactions of genes, pathway assignments were performed based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [72] using BLASTx with an E-value threshold of 10−5.

4.4. EST-SSR Detection and Pprimer Design

Nonredundant unigene sequences longer than 1000 bp were used for mining SSR loci using the MISA tool [49], and primers were designed using BatchPrimer3 v1.0 software with default parameters [73]. Only cDNA-based SSR loci containing two to six nucleotide motifs were considered, the criteria for selection of SSRs were a minimum of six repeats for di-nucleotide motifs and five repeats for tri-, four repeats for tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs. Mononucleotide repeats and complex SSR types were ignored. Frequency of SSR refers to the average number of kilobase pairs of cDNA sequence containing one SSR. The parameters for designing PCR primer pairs from sequences flanking SSRs were as follows: (1) primer length range from 18 to 25 bases (optimal 20 bases); (2) PCR product size range of 100 to 300 bp (optimal 200 bp); (3) annealing temperature of 50–60 °C (optimal 55 °C); and (4) a GC content of 40%–60% (optimal 50%). Other parameters were set at the default value of BatchPrimer3v1.0.

4.5. Plant DNA Extraction, PCR Conditions and Separation of SSR Markers

26 individuals, representing 12 Gynostemma species (Table 6), were selected for analysis of intraspecific genetic diversity, cross-species amplification with the EST-SSRs, and interspecific relationships. Plant DNA was extracted from leaf samples using the CTAB method [74], and DNA integrity was checked via electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel. PCR amplifications were carried out using a MyCycler™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-RAD, CA, USA) in a 10 µL final volume containing 1 × PCR buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 1.5 mM MgCl2], 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2μM of each primer, 50 ng of genomic DNA, and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Biostar, New Taipei, Taiwan). The PCR reaction program was: DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; followed by 32 cycles of 95 °C for 40 s, 50–60 °C (depending on optimized annealing temperature) for 30 s and 72 °C for 50 s. The final extension was performed at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed using 8% PAGE and silver stained [75] with a PBR322 DNA marker ladder (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for assessing the length of the DNA bands. A total of 360 genic SSR markers were selected randomly for genotyping six G. pentaphyllum samples from three populations, 30 highly polymorphic loci were selected for testing the transferability of EST-SSRs to the other ten species in the genus Gynostemma.

4.6. Genetic Analysis and Data Scoring

Of the 30 highly polymorphic loci, genic-SSR markers that amplified successfully in all 12 species were used to assess the genetic diversity in a set of 26 individual plants. Each allele was scored as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the SSR loci. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of each SSR primer was calculated to estimate the allelic variation of SSRs in the 26 individuals according to the formula: PIC = 1 − Σ i = 0 n Pi 2 , where Pi is the frequency of the ith allele for a given SSR marker, and n is the total number of alleles detected for that SSR marker [76]. The genetic similarity between any two individuals was estimated based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient. All 26 individuals were clustered with the UPGMA algorithm and SAHN procedure of the NTSYS-PC v2.10t [77]. Bootstrapping analysis with 1000 replicates was carried out using the software FREETREE V.0.9.1.50 [78]. Bootstrap values over 50 were considered significant and provided on the dendrogram.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing to characterize the transcriptomes of two Gynostemma species. A large-scale EST dataset with 71,607 nonredundant unigenes from G. pentaphyllum and G. cardiospermum was established, which provided valuable sequences for the discovery of new genes and EST-SSR markers. These results support the view that NGS is a fast and cost-effective approach for gene discovery and molecular marker development in nonmodel species.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/12/19758/s1.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Professor Zhan-Lin Liu and Peng Zhao from Northwest University for the helpful discussions and improvement of the writing in this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31270364) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) (No. IRT1174).

Author Contributions

G.-F.Z. and Y.-M.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.-M.Z. performed the experiments and wrote the paper. T.Z. and Z.-H.L. analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, X.F.; Chen, S.K.; Gu, Z.J.; Zhao, J.Z. A chromosomal study on the genus Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae). Acta Bot. Yunnanica 1995, 17, 312–316. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, S.K. A classificatory system and geographical distribution of the genus Gynostemma BL. (Cucurbitaceae). Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 1995, 33, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou, Z.T.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.M.; Zhang, S.L. Effect of Gynostemma pentaphyllum mak on carcinomatous conversions of golden hamster cheek pouches induced by dimethylbenzanthracene: A histological study. Chin. Med. J. 1998, 111, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Lin, C.C.; Huang, P.C.; Lin, J.M. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of Anoectochilus formosanus and Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2000, 28, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yin, F.; Hu, L.H.; Pan, R.X. Novel dammarane-type glycosides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, S.B.; Lin, R.; Hu, Z.H. Histochemical localization of Ginsenosides in Gynostemma Pentaphyllum. and the content changes of total gypenosides. Acta Biol. Exp. Sin. 2005, 38, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, S.B.; Lin, R.; Hu, Z.H. Comparison of stem and leaf structures and total gypenosides among 5 species of Gynostemma. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 2006, 35, 495–499. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, Y.F. A milestone of wild plant conservation in China. Plants 1999, 5, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiang, L.Y.; Qian, Z.Q.; Guo, Z.G.; Wang, C.; Zhao, G.F. Polyploid origins in Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from multiple gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 52, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xu, J.Q.; Shen, Q.; Li, J.; Hu, L.H. Dammaranes from Gynostemma pentaphyllum and synthesis of their derivatives as inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3934–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tsai, Y.C.; Lin, C.L.; Chen, B.H. Preparative chromatography of flavonoids and saponins in Gynostemma pentaphyllum and their antiproliferation effect on hepatoma cell. Phytomedicine 2010, 18, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Razmovski-Naumovski, V.; Huang, T.H.W.; Tran, V.H.; Li, G.Q.; Duke, C.C.; Roufogalis, B.D. Chemistry and pharmacology of Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Phytochem. Rev. 2005, 4, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, Z.; Liu, W.; Huang, H.Q.; Slavin, M.; Zhao, Y.; Whent, M.; Blackford, J.; Lutterodt, H.; Zhou, H.P.; Chen, P.; et al. Chemical composition of five commercial Gynostemma pentaphyllum samples and their radical scavenging, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 11243–11249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Subramaniyam, S.; Mathiyalagan, R.; In, J.G.; Lee, B.; Lee, S.; Y., D.C. Transcriptome profiling and in silico analysis of Gynostemma pentaphyllum using a next generation sequencer. Plant. Cell. Rep. 2011, 30, 2075–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.G.; Wang, X.F.; Lu, F.; Song, Z.P. Microsatellite markers in the traditional Chinese medicinal herb Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Cucurbitaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, e61–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Qian, Z.Q.; Zhao, G.F. Genetic differentiation in endangered Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino based on ISSR polymorphism and its implications for conservation. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zane, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Patarnello, T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Squirrell, J.; Hollingsworth, P.M.; Woodhead, M.; Russell, J.; Lowe, A.J.; Gibby, M.; Powell, W. How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants? Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 1339–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bozhko, M.; Riegel, R.; Schubert, R.; Müller-Starck, G. A cyclophilin gene marker confirming geographical differentiation of Norway spruce populations and indicating viability response on excess soil-born salinity. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 3147–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A.; Sorrells, M.E. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: Features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Peakall, R.; Gilmore, S.; Keys, W.; Morgante, M.; Rafalski, A. Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: Implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Eujayl, I.; Sledge, M.K.; Wang, L.; May, G.D.; Chekhovskiy, K.; Zwonitzer, J.C.; Mian, M.A. Medicago truncatula EST-SSRs reveal cross-species genetic markers for Medicago spp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, L.Y.; Bernard, M.; Leroy, P.; Feuillet, C.; Sourdille, P. High transferability of bread wheat EST-derived SSRs to other cereals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Poncet, V.; Rondeau, M.; Tranchant, C.; Cayrel, A.; Hamon, S.; de Kochko, A.; Hamon, P. SSR mining in coffee tree EST databases: Potential use of EST-SSRs as markers for the Coffea genus. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2006, 276, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luro, F.L.; Costantino, G.; Terol, J.; Argout, X.; Allario, T.; Wincker, P.; Talon, M.; Ollitrault, P.; Morillon, R. Transferability of the EST-SSRs developed on Nules clementine (Citrus clementina Hort ex Tan) to other Citrus species and their effectiveness for genetic mapping. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zheng, X.F.; Pan, C.; Diao, Y.; You, Y.N.; Yang, C.Z.; Hu, Z.L. Development of microsatellite markers by transcriptome sequencing in two species of Amorphophallus (Araceae). BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zalapa, J.E.; Cuevas, H.; Zhu, H.; Steffan, S.; Senalik, D.; Zeldin, E.; McCown, B.; Harbut, R.; Simon, P. Using next-generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bouck, A.; Vision, T. The molecular ecologist’s guide to expressed sequence tags. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 907–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Emrich, S.J.; Barbazuk, W.B.; Li, L.; Schnable, P.S. Gene discovery and annotation using LCM-454 transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vera, J.C.; Wheat, C.W.; Fescemyer, H.W.; Frilander, M.J.; Crawford, D.L.; Hanski, I.; Marden, J.H. Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Barbazuk, W.B.; Emrich, S.J.; Chen, H.D.; Li, L.; Schnable, P.S. SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing. Plant. J. 2007, 51, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Novaes, E.; Drost, D.R.; Farmerie, W.G.; Pappas, G.J., Jr.; Grattapaglia, D.; Sederoff, R.R.; Kirst, M. High-throughput gene and SNP discovery in Eucalyptus grandis, an uncharacterized genome. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Namroud, M.C.; Beaulieu, J.; Juge, N.; Laroche, J.; Bousquet, J. Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 3599–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zeng, S.H.; Xiao, G.; Guo, J.; Fei, Z.J.; Xu, Y.Q.; Roe, B.A.; Wang, Y. Development of a EST dataset and characterization of EST-SSRs in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Maxim. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Luo, H.M.; Sun, Y.Z.; Song, J.Y.; Lui, E.M.; Chen, S.L. De novo sequencing and analysis of the American ginseng root transcriptome using a GS FLX Titanium platform to discover putative genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Luo, H.M.; Sun, C.; Sun, Y.Z.; Wu, Q.; Li, Y.; Song, J.Y.; Niu, Y.Y.; Cheng, X.L.; Xu, H.X.; Li, C.Y.; et al. Analysis of the transcriptome of Panax notoginseng root uncovers putative triterpene saponin-biosynthetic genes and genetic markers. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wei, W.L.; Qi, X.Q.; Wang, L.H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Hua, W.; Li, D.H.; Lv, H.X.; Zhang, X.R. Characterization of the sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) global transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Z.Y.; Fang, B.P.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Luo, Z.X.; Huang, L.F.; Chen, X.L.; Li, Y.J. De novo assembly and characterization of root transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of cSSR markers in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, D.J.; Deng, Z.; Qin, B.; Liu, X.H.; Men, Z.H. De novo assembly and characterization of bark transcriptome using Illumina sequencing and development of EST-SSR markers in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Luikart, G.; England, P.R.; Tallmon, D.; Jordan, S.; Taberlet, P. The power and promise of population genomics: From genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kumpatla, S.P.; Mukhopadhyay, S. Mining and survey of simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags of dicotyledonous species. Genome 2005, 48, 985–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jhanwar, S.; Priya, P.; Garg, R.; Parida, S.K.; Tyagi, A.K.; Jain, M. Transcriptome sequencing of wild chickpea as a rich resource for marker development. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, D.N.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Jin, M.D.; Li, H.K.; Song, Z.P.; Wang, Y.G.; Chen, J.K. Characterization and high cross-species transferability of microsatellite markers from the floral transcriptome of Aspidistra saxicola (Asparagaceae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2014, 14, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cloutier, S.; Niu, Z.X.; Datla, R.; Duguid, S. Development and analysis of EST-SSRs for flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tóth, G.; Gáspári, Z.; Jurka, J. Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: Survey and analysis. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Varshney, R.K.; Thiel, T.; Stein, N.; Langridge, P.; Graner, A. In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2002, 7, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Kaur, S.; Pembleton, L.W.; Cogan, N.O.; Savin, K.W.; Leonforte, T.; Paull, J.; Materne, M.; Forster, J.W. Transcriptome sequencing of field pea and faba bean for discovery and validation of SSR genetic markers. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Thiel, T.; Michalek, W.; Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Han, Z.G.; Guo, W.Z.; Song, X.L.; Zhang, T.Z. Genetic mapping of EST-derived microsatellites from the diploid Gossypium arboreum in allotetraploid cotton. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2004, 272, 308–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hisano, H.; Sato, S.; Isobe, S.; Sasamoto, S.; Wada, T.; Matsuno, A.; Fujishiro, T.; Yamada, M.; Nakayama, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Harada, K.; Tabata, S. Characterization of the soybean genome using EST-derived microsatellite markers. DNA Res. 2007, 14, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kaur, S.; Cogan, N.O.; Pembleton, L.W.; Shinozuka, M.; Savin, K.W.; Materne, M.; Forster, J.W. Transcriptome sequencing of lentil based on second-generation technology permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. La Rota, M.; Kantety, R.V.; Yu, J.K.; Sorrells, M.E. Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley. BMC Genom. 2005, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Chen, C.X.; Zhou, P.; Choi, Y.A.; Huang, S.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr. Mining and characterizing microsatellites from citrus ESTs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Metzgar, D.; Bytof, J.; Wills, C. Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Parida, S.K.; Kumar, K.A. R.; Dalal, V.; Singh, N.K.; Mohapatra, T. Unigene derived microsatellite markers for the cereal genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 808–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Parida, S.K.; Dalal, V.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, N.K.; Mohapatra, T. Genic non-coding microsatellites in the rice genome: Characterization, marker design and use in assessing genetic and evolutionary relationships among domesticated groups. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dutta, S.; Kumawat, G.; Singh, B.P.; Gupta, D.K.; Singh, S.; Dogra, V.; Gaikwad, K.; Sharma, T.R.; Raje, R.S.; Bandhopadhya, T.K.; et al. Development of genic-SSR markers by deep transcriptome sequencing in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. BMC Plant. Biol. 2011, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Rungis, D.; Berube, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ralph, S.; Ritland, C.E.; Ellis, B.E.; Douglas, C.; Bohlmann, J.; Ritland, K. Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ueno, S.; Le Provost, G.; Leger, V.; Klopp, C.; Noirot, C.; Frigerio, J.M.; Salin, F.; Salse, J.; Abrouk, M.; Murat, F.; et al. Bioinformatic analysis of ESTs collected by Sanger and pyrosequencing methods for a keystone forest tree species: Oak. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Singh, R.; Zaki, N.; Ting, N.-C.; Rosli, R.; Tan, S.-G.; Low, E.-T.; Ithnin, M.; Cheah, S.-C. Exploiting an oil palm EST database for the development of gene-derived SSR markers and their exploitation for assessment of genetic diversity. Biologia 2008, 63, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, L.; Yan, H.F.; Wu, W.; Yu, H.; Ge, X.J. Comparative transcriptome analysis and marker development of two closely related Primrose species (Primula poissonii and Primula wilsonii). BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Torales, S.L.; Rivarola, M.; Pomponio, M.F.; Fernandez, P.; Acuna, C.V.; Marchelli, P.; Gonzalez, S.; Azpilicueta, M.M.; Hopp, H.E.; Gallo, L.A.; et al. Transcriptome survey of Patagonian southern beech Nothofagus nervosa (= N. Alpina.): Assembly, annotation and molecular marker discovery. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Saha, M.C.; Mian, M.R.; Eujayl, I.; Zwonitzer, J.C.; Wang, L.; May, G.D. Tall fescue EST-SSR markers with transferability across several grass species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cho, Y.G.; Ishii, T.; Temnykh, S.; Chen, X.; Lipovich, L.; McCOUCH, S.R.; Park, W.D.; Ayres, N.; Cartinhour, S. Diversity of microsatellites derived from genomic libraries and GenBank sequences in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Eujayl, I.; Sorrells, M.; Baum, M.; Wolters, P.; Powell, W. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ellis, J.R.; Burke, J.M. EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 2007, 99, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Barbara, T.; Palma-Silva, C.; Paggi, G.M.; Bered, F.; Fay, M.F.; Lexer, C. Cross-species transfer of nuclear microsatellite markers: Potential and limitations. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 3759–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, X.; Zheng, Q.J.; Li, Z.H.; Zhao, G.F. Genetic diversity and population structure of Gynostemma pentaphyllun. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2015, 46, 1958–1965. [Google Scholar]
  70. Conesa, A.; Gotz, S.; Garcia-Gomez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talon, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. You, F.M.; Huo, N.; Gu, Y.Q.; Luo, M.C.; Ma, Y.; Hane, D.; Lazo, G.R.; Dvorak, J.; Anderson, O.D. BatchPrimer3: A high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Porebski, S.; Bailey, L.G.; Baum, B.R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1997, 15, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Creste, S.; Neto, A.T.; Figueira, A. Detection of single sequence repeat polymorphisms in denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gels by silver staining. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2001, 19, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Botstein, D.; White, R.L.; Skolnick, M.; Davis, R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980, 32, 314. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Rolf, J. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.11; T Exeter Software: Setauket, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pavlicek, A.; Hrda, S.; Flegr, J. Free-Tree-freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and bootstrap/jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of genus Frenkelia. Folia Biol. 1999, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: All samples are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.-M.; Zhou, T.; Li, Z.-H.; Zhao, G.-F. Characterization of Global Transcriptome Using Illumina Paired-End Sequencing and Development of EST-SSR Markers in Two Species of Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae). Molecules 2015, 20, 21214-21231. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219758

AMA Style

Zhao Y-M, Zhou T, Li Z-H, Zhao G-F. Characterization of Global Transcriptome Using Illumina Paired-End Sequencing and Development of EST-SSR Markers in Two Species of Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae). Molecules. 2015; 20(12):21214-21231. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yue-Mei, Tao Zhou, Zhong-Hu Li, and Gui-Fang Zhao. 2015. "Characterization of Global Transcriptome Using Illumina Paired-End Sequencing and Development of EST-SSR Markers in Two Species of Gynostemma (Cucurbitaceae)" Molecules 20, no. 12: 21214-21231. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219758

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop