Next Article in Journal
Utility–Leakage Trade-Off for Federated Representation Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling Sudden Transitions Between Classical and Quantum Decoherence in the Hyperfine Structure of Hydrogen Atoms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Integrated Modularization of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide System for Aircraft Carrier Nuclear Power
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Multi-Objective Framework for Biomethanol Process Integration in Sugarcane Biorefineries Under a Multiperiod MILP Superstructure

by
Victor Fernandes Garcia
1,
Reynaldo Palacios-Bereche
1 and
Adriano Viana Ensinas
2,*
1
Center of Engineering, Modeling and Social Science Applied, Federal University of ABC, Santo André 09280, Brazil
2
Department of Engineering, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2025, 27(11), 1162; https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111162 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 October 2025 / Revised: 10 November 2025 / Accepted: 12 November 2025 / Published: 15 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermodynamic Optimization of Energy Systems)

Abstract

The growing demand for renewable energy positions biorefineries as key to enhancing biofuel competitiveness. This study proposes a novel MILP superstructure integrating resource seasonality, process selection, and heat integration to optimize biomethanol production in a sugarcane biorefinery. A multi-objective optimization balancing net present value (NPV) and avoided CO2 emissions reveals that energy integration improves environmental performance with limited economic impact. The model estimates the production of up to 66.85 kg of biomethanol/ton sugarcane from bagasse gasification, 40.7 kg e-methanol/ton sugarcane via CO2 hydrogenation, and 3.68 kg of biomethane/ton sugarcane from biogas upgrading. Hydrogen production through biomethane reforming and photovoltaic-powered electrolysis increases methanol output without raising emissions. The integrated system achieves energy efficiencies of up to 57.3% and enables the avoidance of up to 493 kg of CO2/ton sugarcane over the planning horizon. When thermal integration is excluded, efficiency drops by 8% and net energy production per area falls by 11%, due to the need to divert bagasse to cogeneration. Although economic challenges remain, CO2 remuneration ranging from USD 3.27 to USD 129.79 per ton could ensure project viability. These findings highlight the role of integrated energy systems in enabling sustainable and economically feasible sugarcane biorefineries.
Keywords: sugarcane biorefinery; biomethanol production; multi-objective optimization; MILP-based superstructure; heat integration sugarcane biorefinery; biomethanol production; multi-objective optimization; MILP-based superstructure; heat integration

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garcia, V.F.; Palacios-Bereche, R.; Ensinas, A.V. A Multi-Objective Framework for Biomethanol Process Integration in Sugarcane Biorefineries Under a Multiperiod MILP Superstructure. Entropy 2025, 27, 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111162

AMA Style

Garcia VF, Palacios-Bereche R, Ensinas AV. A Multi-Objective Framework for Biomethanol Process Integration in Sugarcane Biorefineries Under a Multiperiod MILP Superstructure. Entropy. 2025; 27(11):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garcia, Victor Fernandes, Reynaldo Palacios-Bereche, and Adriano Viana Ensinas. 2025. "A Multi-Objective Framework for Biomethanol Process Integration in Sugarcane Biorefineries Under a Multiperiod MILP Superstructure" Entropy 27, no. 11: 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111162

APA Style

Garcia, V. F., Palacios-Bereche, R., & Ensinas, A. V. (2025). A Multi-Objective Framework for Biomethanol Process Integration in Sugarcane Biorefineries Under a Multiperiod MILP Superstructure. Entropy, 27(11), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop