Review Reports
- Ling-Hua Chang1,*,
- Po-Ning Chen2 and
- Fady Alajaji3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Adão Paulo Soares Silva
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
See attached pdf.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The topic of this paper is interesting and the math formulations seem rigorous but the reviewer has some concerns,
· The reviewer suggest to add more details regarding the SoA. As is it too summarized and almost half of the introduction is dedicated to [1].
· What is the motivation to have “Overview of the Proof” in section 2 and then an entire section 3 for the proof?
· The paper is a little bit hard to follow since there are a lot of math formulation and proofs See the possibility to move some parts to the Annex.
· Is it possible to add 1 or 2 figures with the results to make the paper more appealing?
Author Response
Please see the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Authors had addressed my (otherwise minor) comments.
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have addressed the main reviewer concerns.