Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study on an RBF-FD Tangent Plane Based Method for Convection–Diffusion Equations on Anisotropic Evolving Surfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrodynamic Behavior of Self-Propelled Particles in a Simple Shear Flow
Previous Article in Special Issue
Medical Image Authentication Method Based on the Wavelet Packet and Energy Entropy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Privacy-Preserving Design of Scalar LQG Control

1
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2
School of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”—DEI, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2022, 24(7), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070856
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 19 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adversarial Intelligence: Secrecy, Privacy, and Robustness)

Abstract

This paper studies the agent identity privacy problem in the scalar linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control system. The agent identity is a binary hypothesis: Agent A or Agent B. An eavesdropper is assumed to make a hypothesis testing the agent identity based on the intercepted environment state sequence. The privacy risk is measured by the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the probability distributions of state sequences under two hypotheses. By taking into account both the accumulative control reward and privacy risk, an optimization problem of the policy of Agent B is formulated. This paper shows that the optimal deterministic privacy-preserving LQG policy of Agent B is a linear mapping. A sufficient condition is given to guarantee that the optimal deterministic privacy-preserving policy is time-invariant in the asymptotic regime. It is also shown that adding an independent Gaussian random process noise to the linear mapping of the optimal deterministic privacy-preserving policy cannot improve the performance of Agent B. The numerical experiments justify the theoretic results and illustrate the reward–privacy trade-off.
Keywords: control–privacy trade-off; hypothesis testing; Kullback–Leibler divergence; optimal control policy; privacy risk analysis control–privacy trade-off; hypothesis testing; Kullback–Leibler divergence; optimal control policy; privacy risk analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferrari, E.; Tian, Y.; Sun, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, C. Privacy-Preserving Design of Scalar LQG Control. Entropy 2022, 24, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070856

AMA Style

Ferrari E, Tian Y, Sun C, Li Z, Wang C. Privacy-Preserving Design of Scalar LQG Control. Entropy. 2022; 24(7):856. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferrari, Edoardo, Yue Tian, Chenglong Sun, Zuxing Li, and Chao Wang. 2022. "Privacy-Preserving Design of Scalar LQG Control" Entropy 24, no. 7: 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070856

APA Style

Ferrari, E., Tian, Y., Sun, C., Li, Z., & Wang, C. (2022). Privacy-Preserving Design of Scalar LQG Control. Entropy, 24(7), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070856

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop