Are Virtual Particles Less Real?
AbstractThe question of whether virtual quantum particles exist is considered here in light of previous critical analysis and under the assumption that there are particles in the world as described by quantum field theory. The relationship of the classification of particles to quantum-field-theoretic calculations and the diagrammatic aids that are often used in them is clarified. It is pointed out that the distinction between virtual particles and others and, therefore, judgments regarding their reality have been made on basis of these methods rather than on their physical characteristics. As such, it has obscured the question of their existence. It is here argued that the most influential arguments against the existence of virtual particles but not other particles fail because they either are arguments against the existence of particles in general rather than virtual particles per se, or are dependent on the imposition of classical intuitions on quantum systems, or are simply beside the point. Several reasons are then provided for considering virtual particles real, such as their descriptive, explanatory, and predictive value, and a clearer characterization of virtuality—one in terms of intermediate states—that also applies beyond perturbation theory is provided. It is also pointed out that in the role of force mediators, they serve to preclude action-at-a-distance between interacting particles. For these reasons, it is concluded that virtual particles are as real as other quantum particles. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Jaeger, G. Are Virtual Particles Less Real? Entropy 2019, 21, 141.
Jaeger G. Are Virtual Particles Less Real? Entropy. 2019; 21(2):141.Chicago/Turabian Style
Jaeger, Gregg. 2019. "Are Virtual Particles Less Real?" Entropy 21, no. 2: 141.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.