Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Relevance of Specific Response Features in the Neural Code
Next Article in Special Issue
Are Virtual Particles Less Real?
Previous Article in Journal
A Fractional Single-Phase-Lag Model of Heat Conduction for Describing Propagation of the Maximum Temperature in a Finite Medium
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments

Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality

Département d’informatique et d’ingénierie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Case postale 1250, succursale Hull, Gatineau, QC J8X 3X7, Canada
Entropy 2018, 20(11), 877;
Received: 11 September 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 8 November 2018 / Published: 15 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Ultimate Quantum Theory (UQT))
Bell-type inequalities are proven using oversimplified probabilistic models and/or counterfactual definiteness (CFD). If setting-dependent variables describing measuring instruments are correctly introduced, none of these inequalities may be proven. In spite of this, a belief in a mysterious quantum nonlocality is not fading. Computer simulations of Bell tests allow people to study the different ways in which the experimental data might have been created. They also allow for the generation of various counterfactual experiments’ outcomes, such as repeated or simultaneous measurements performed in different settings on the same “photon-pair”, and so forth. They allow for the reinforcing or relaxing of CFD compliance and/or for studying the impact of various “photon identification procedures”, mimicking those used in real experiments. Data samples consistent with quantum predictions may be generated by using a specific setting-dependent identification procedure. It reflects the active role of instruments during the measurement process. Each of the setting-dependent data samples are consistent with specific setting-dependent probabilistic models which may not be deduced using non-contextual local realistic or stochastic hidden variables. In this paper, we will be discussing the results of these simulations. Since the data samples are generated in a locally causal way, these simulations provide additional strong arguments for closing the door on quantum nonlocality. View Full-Text
Keywords: Bell-inequalities; quantum nonlocality; computer simulations of Bell tests; local causality; contextuality loophole; photon identification loophole Bell-inequalities; quantum nonlocality; computer simulations of Bell tests; local causality; contextuality loophole; photon identification loophole
MDPI and ACS Style

Kupczynski, M. Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality. Entropy 2018, 20, 877.

AMA Style

Kupczynski M. Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality. Entropy. 2018; 20(11):877.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kupczynski, Marian. 2018. "Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality" Entropy 20, no. 11: 877.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop