Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality
AbstractBell-type inequalities are proven using oversimplified probabilistic models and/or counterfactual definiteness (CFD). If setting-dependent variables describing measuring instruments are correctly introduced, none of these inequalities may be proven. In spite of this, a belief in a mysterious quantum nonlocality is not fading. Computer simulations of Bell tests allow people to study the different ways in which the experimental data might have been created. They also allow for the generation of various counterfactual experiments’ outcomes, such as repeated or simultaneous measurements performed in different settings on the same “photon-pair”, and so forth. They allow for the reinforcing or relaxing of CFD compliance and/or for studying the impact of various “photon identification procedures”, mimicking those used in real experiments. Data samples consistent with quantum predictions may be generated by using a specific setting-dependent identification procedure. It reflects the active role of instruments during the measurement process. Each of the setting-dependent data samples are consistent with specific setting-dependent probabilistic models which may not be deduced using non-contextual local realistic or stochastic hidden variables. In this paper, we will be discussing the results of these simulations. Since the data samples are generated in a locally causal way, these simulations provide additional strong arguments for closing the door on quantum nonlocality. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Kupczynski, M. Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality. Entropy 2018, 20, 877.
Kupczynski M. Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality. Entropy. 2018; 20(11):877.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kupczynski, Marian. 2018. "Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality." Entropy 20, no. 11: 877.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.