Perception and Trust Construction in Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce: Evidence from Consumer Purchase Intention in Emerging Economies
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theory and Hypotheses
2.1. Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce
2.2. The S-O-R Model
3. Hypothesis Development and Theoretical Framework
3.1. The Role of Livestreaming Scenarios
3.2. The Role of Product Packaging
3.3. The Role of Anchor Interaction
3.4. The Role of Consumer Engagement
3.5. The Role of Cultural Perception
3.6. The Role of Affective Perception
3.7. The Role of Consumer Trust
3.8. The Moderating Role of Emotional Energy
4. Methodology
4.1. Sample and Data Collection
4.2. Variable Measurement
4.3. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.4. Common Method Bias Test
5. Data Analysis and Results
5.1. Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis
5.2. Path Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
5.3. Mediation Effect Testing
5.4. Moderation Effect Analysis
6. Research Findings and Implications
6.1. Discussion
6.2. Contribution
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hoskisson, R.E.; Eden, L.; Lau, C.M.; Wright, M. Strategy in Emerging Economies. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheth, J.N. Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanna, T.; Palepu, K.G.; Sinha, J. Strategies That Fit Emerging Markets. In International Business Strategy; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, G. Agricultural Products Live Streaming E-Commerce Ecosystem Dynamics Research. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1685996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, P.K.; Li, H. Digital Marketing: A Framework, Review and Research Agenda. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2017, 34, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, D.L.; Carlson, J.; Filieri, R.; Jacobson, J.; Jain, V.; Karjaluoto, H.; Kefi, H.; Krishen, A.S.; et al. Setting the Future of Digital and Social Media Marketing Research: Perspectives and Research Propositions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 59, 102168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Chang, L.; Zhang, G. Increasing Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for the Sustainability of Live Farming Assistance: A Group Impact Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, X.; Zhao, H.; Li, T. The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention Regarding Green Agricultural Products. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Tao, Z.; Aisihaer, N. Effect of Visualization of Production Process on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions in Farmer-Assisted Livestreaming. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2024, 36, 2577–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Li, F.; Hu, M. The influence of atmospheric cues and social presence on consumers’ impulse buying behaviors in e-commerce live streaming. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 25, 3325–3353. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, Y.X.; Chae, S.W.; Xiang, Y.C. How Social and Media Cues Induce Live Streaming Impulse Buying? SOR Model Perspective. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 1379992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, N. Product Presentation in the Live-Streaming Context: The Effect of Consumer Perceived Product Value and Time Pressure on Consumer’s Purchase Intention. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1124675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, H.; Liang, J.; Liu, J.; Shen, M.; Liu, X. From Visibility to Trust: The Impact of Agricultural Product Packaging Images in Livestreaming on Consumer Perception and Repurchase Intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Cujilema, S.; Hu, L.; Xie, G. How Social Scene Characteristics Affect Customers’ Purchase Intention: The Role of Trust and Privacy Concerns in Live Streaming Commerce. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addo, P.C.; Fang, J.; Asare, A.O.; Kulbo, N.B. Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming Digital Marketing Platforms. Serv. Ind. J. 2021, 41, 767–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, R.; Li, Z.; Na, S. How Customer Engagement in the Live-Streaming Affects Purchase Intention and Customer Acquisition, E-Tailer’s Perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 103015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodworrth, R.S. Dynamics of Behavior; Henry Holt and Company, Inc.: Methuen, MA, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; pp. xii, 266. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, X.; He, L.; Hu, Z. Impact of Rural E-Commerce on Farmers’ Income and Income Gap. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Patrick L’ESPOIR DECOSTA, J.-N.; Gamage, A. Travel Live Streaming and Tourist Decision-Making: A Psychological and Behavioural Perspective on Bridging Virtual Engagement and Physical Travel. J. Travel Res. 2026, 00472875261430748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiyun, C. The Role of Regional Public Brands in Live Streaming Sales of Agricultural Products and Their Impact on Farmers’ Sustainable Income and Green Agricultural Development: An Empirical Analysis of Consumers in Guangdong, China. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag. 2025, 10, 754–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Peng, Y. What Drives Gift-Giving Intention in Live Streaming? The Perspectives of Emotional Attachment and Flow Experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manthiou, A.; Ayadi, K.; Lee, S.; Chiang, L.; Tang, L. Exploring the Roles of Self-Concept and Future Memory at Consumer Events: The Application of an Extended Mehrabian–Russell Model. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2017, 34, 531–543. [Google Scholar]
- Sherman, E.; Mathur, A.; Smith, R.B. Store Environment and Consumer Purchase Behavior: Mediating Role of Consumer Emotions. Psychol. Mark. 1997, 14, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Wang, A.; Sun, Y. Technological Environment, Virtual Experience, and MOOC Continuance: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Perspective. Comput. Educ. 2020, 144, 103721. [Google Scholar]
- Hemsley-Brown, J.; Alnawas, I. Service Quality and Brand Loyalty: The Mediation Effect of Brand Passion, Brand Affection and Self-Brand Connection. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 2771–2794. [Google Scholar]
- Masrom, M.B.; Busalim, A.H.; Abuhassna, H.; Mahmood, N.H.N. Understanding Students’ Behavior in Online Social Networks: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021, 18, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theocharis, D.; Tsekouropoulos, G. Sustainable Consumption and Branding for Gen Z: How Brand Dimensions Influence Consumer Behavior and Adoption of Newly Launched Technological Products. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-J.; Tsai, I.-Y.; Chang, T.-Y. Exploring Tourist Behavior in a Reused Heritage Site. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2023, 47, 1071–1088. [Google Scholar]
- Han, T.; Han, J.; Liu, J.; Li, W. Effect of emotional factors on purchase intention in live streaming marketing of agricultural products: A moderated mediation model. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, L.; Shin, D. Effect of Online Product Presentation on the Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices: The Role of Mental Imagery and Individualism–Collectivism. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, L.; Zhao, H. Research on consumers’ purchase intention of cultural and creative products—Metaphor design based on traditional cultural symbols. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0301678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, X.; Ren, J.; Lang, X.; Yang, Z.; Li, T. The Influence of Live Video Hosts’ Speech Act on Purchase Behaviour. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 81, 103984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Chen, Z. Live Streaming Commerce and Consumers’ Purchase Intention: An Uncertainty Reduction Perspective. Inf. Manag. 2021, 58, 103509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Yuan, X.; Yang, X. Study of the Influencing Mechanism of User Interaction Behavior of Short Video E-Commerce Live-Streaming from the Perspective of SOR Theory and Interactive Ritual Chains. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 28403–28415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.; Kanyan, L.R.; Shanat, M.B. Cultural Authenticity and Purchase Intention of Chinese Luxury Brand Logo. J. Graph. Eng. Des. 2025, 16, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, R.; Tong, L. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Purchase Intention during Livestreaming e-Commerce: The Mediating Effect of Emotion. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 903023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Y.; Shao, X.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Nie, K. How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2019, 37, 100886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handoyo, S. Purchasing in the Digital Age: A Meta-Analytical Perspective on Trust, Risk, Security, and e-WOM in e-Commerce. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Green, M.C.; Brock, T.C. The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 701–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witmer, B.G.; Singer, M.J. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1998, 7, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, E.B.; Short, J.; Williams, E.; Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. In Proceedings of the Contemporary Sociology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1978; Volume 7, p. 32. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, S.A.; Marsh, H.W. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1996, 18, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, M.H. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 44, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooke, J. SUS: A “quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlou, P.A. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 7, 101–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W.; Chaveesuk, S. Exploring the Influence of Live Streaming on Consumer Purchase Intention: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach in the Chinese E-Commerce Sector. Acta Psychol. 2024, 249, 104415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gu, C.; Sun, X.; Wei, W.; Sun, J.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, L. How to Improve Users’ Purchase Intention of Agricultural Products through Live Streaming Systems? Acta Psychol. 2025, 254, 104883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Samsudin, M.R.; Zou, Y. The Impact of Visual Elements of Packaging Design on Purchase Intention: Brand Experience as a Mediator in the Tea Bag Product Category. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prabowo, D.; Aji, H. Visual Packaging and Perceived Emotional Value: A Study on Islamic Branded Cosmetics. South East Asian J. Manag. 2021, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bambauer-Sachse, S.; Gierl, H. Effects of Nostalgic Advertising through Emotions and the Intensity of the Evoked Mental Images. Adv. Consum. Res. 2009, 36, 391. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.C.-C. The Impact of Nostalgic Emotions on Consumer Satisfaction with Packaging Design. J. Bus. Retail Manag. Res. 2014, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
- Li, N.; Xuan, C.; Chen, R. Different Roles of Two Kinds of Digital Coexistence: The Impact of Social Presence on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in the Live Streaming Shopping Context. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 80, 103890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Impacts of Different Interactive Elements on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Live Streaming e-Commerce. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0315731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meng, L.; Duan, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lü, K.; Chen, S. The Impact of Online Celebrity in Livestreaming E-Commerce on Purchase Intention from the Perspective of Emotional Contagion. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doanh, D.C.; Tram, T.B.; Vu, P.Q.; Linh, L.T.N.; Huong, N.T.T. Blockchain-Based Food Traceability System and Green Brand Image: Enhancing Product Trust and Purchase Intentions for Online Agricultural Products. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2026, 20, 100368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Bie, Y.; Li, J. Understanding Interaction Rituals: The Impact of Interaction Ritual Chains of the Live Broadcast on People’s Wellbeing. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1041059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ngo, T.T.A.; Bui, C.T.; Chau, H.K.L.; Tran, N.P.N. The Effects of Social Media Live Streaming Commerce on Vietnamese Generation Z Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Innov. Mark. 2023, 19, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, M.; Latif, S.; Bao, D.; Latif, Z.; Lu, J. Overcoming E-Commerce Barriers in Developing Markets: A Review of Data-Driven Strategies for Sustainable Growth. Sustain. Futur. 2025, 10, 101408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morepje, M.T.; Sithole, M.Z.; Msweli, N.S.; Agholor, A.I. The Influence of E-Commerce Platforms on Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Smallholder Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Construct | Items | Measurement Item | Main Adapted Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Streaming Scenario (LS) | LS1 | The rural livestreaming scenario makes me feel the authenticity of the product origin. | NTS (Green & Brock, 2000) [40]; IPQ (Schubert et al., 2001) [41]; SPS (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) [42]. |
| LS2 | The natural environment and production setting in the livestream enhance my sense of presence. | ||
| LS3 | The livestreaming scenario helps me better understand the rural context of the product. | ||
| LS4 | The overall rural atmosphere in the livestream is realistic and engaging. | ||
| Product Packaging (PP) | PP1 | The product packaging visually conveys the local characteristics of rural products. | NTS (Green & Brock, 2000) [40]; Purchase intention scale (Pavlou, 2003) [46]. |
| PP2 | The packaging design helps me understand the cultural value of the product. | ||
| PP3 | The colors, patterns, or symbols on the packaging make the product more recognizable. | ||
| PP4 | The packaging enhances my perception of the product’s quality and uniqueness. | ||
| PP5 | The packaging makes the rural product more attractive to me. | ||
| Anchor Interaction (AI) | AI1 | The anchor provides timely responses to consumers’ questions. | SPS (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) [42]; SUS (Brooke, 1996) [45]. |
| AI2 | The anchor clearly explains the product’s origin, quality, and usage. | ||
| AI3 | The anchor’s interaction makes me feel involved in the livestream. | ||
| AI4 | The anchor’s explanation increases my understanding of the product and its rural background. | ||
| Consumer Engagement (CE) | CE1 | Comments and danmaku comments from other viewers help me understand the product more clearly. | SPS (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) [42]; SUS (Brooke, 1996) [45]; IRI (Davis, 1980/1983) [44]. |
| CE2 | Other viewers’ feedback increases my confidence in the product. | ||
| CE3 | Interaction among viewers creates a shared atmosphere in the livestreaming room. | ||
| CE4 | Other consumers’ questions, comments, or purchase feedback influence my perception of the product. | ||
| Emotional Energy (EE) | EE1 | I feel energized when participating in the livestreaming interaction. | FSS (Jackson & Marsh, 1996) [43]; IRI (Davis, 1980/1983) [44]. |
| EE2 | I feel a sense of belonging in the livestreaming room. | ||
| EE3 | The interactive atmosphere in the livestream makes me feel emotionally involved. | ||
| EE4 | The livestreaming interaction motivates me to continue watching or participating. | ||
| Cultural Perception (CP) | CP1 | The livestream helps me understand the local culture behind the rural product. | NTS (Green & Brock, 2000) [40]; IPQ (Schubert et al., 2001) [41]; SPS (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) [42]. |
| CP2 | The livestream makes me perceive the cultural meaning of the product. | ||
| CP3 | The livestream helps me recognize the relationship between the product and its place of origin. | ||
| CP4 | The product presentation in the livestream reflects local lifestyle and rural traditions. | ||
| CP5 | The livestream strengthens my perception of the product’s regional and cultural value. | ||
| Affective Perception (AP) | AP1 | The livestream makes me feel emotionally connected to rural products. | NTS (Green & Brock, 2000) [40]; FSS (Jackson & Marsh, 1996) [43]; IRI (Davis, 1980/1983) [44]. |
| AP2 | The livestream gives me a sense of closeness and warmth. | ||
| AP3 | The rural stories or product presentation in the livestream resonate with me emotionally. | ||
| AP4 | The livestream makes me feel more willing to support rural products. | ||
| Consumer Trust (CT) | CT1 | The information provided in the livestream is trustworthy. | SPS (Gunawardena & Zittle, 1997) [42]; SUS (Brooke, 1996) [45]. |
| CT2 | I trust the authenticity of the product origin presented in the livestream. | ||
| CT3 | I believe the product quality shown in the livestream is credible. | ||
| CT4 | I trust the anchor’s explanation and recommendation of the product. | ||
| CT5 | I feel confident about purchasing products through this rural livestreaming channel. | ||
| Purchase Intention (PI) | PI1 | I am willing to purchase rural products recommended in the livestream. | The purchase intention measurement paradigm (Jordan and Philips Corporate Design, 1996) [46]. |
| PI2 | I would consider buying similar rural products through livestreaming in the future. | ||
| PI3 | I am likely to try rural products introduced in the livestream. | ||
| PI4 | I would recommend the rural products from this livestream to others. | ||
| PI5 | If needed, I would prioritize purchasing rural products through livestreaming. |
| Construct | Items | Factor Loading | Cronbach’s α if Item Deleted | Cronbach’s Alpha | α | Composite Reliability | Convergent Validity | Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin | Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | AVE | KMO | Sig. | ||||||
| Live Streaming Scenario (LS) | LS1 | 0.839 | 0.877 | 0.9087 | 0.9141 | 0.9362 | 0.7858 | 0.934 | *** |
| LS2 | 0.833 | 0.884 | |||||||
| LS3 | 0.827 | 0.887 | |||||||
| LS4 | 0.842 | 0.878 | |||||||
| Product Packaging (PP) | PP 1 | 0.876 | 0.935 | 0.9472 | 0.9595 | 0.8257 | |||
| PP 2 | 0.875 | 0.934 | |||||||
| PP 3 | 0.867 | 0.937 | |||||||
| PP 4 | 0.872 | 0.935 | |||||||
| PP 5 | 0.886 | 0.933 | |||||||
| Anchor Interaction (AI) | AI1 | 0.835 | 0.858 | 0.8858 | 0.9212 | 0.7451 | |||
| AI2 | 0.845 | 0.854 | |||||||
| AI3 | 0.864 | 0.851 | |||||||
| AI4 | 0.856 | 0.850 | |||||||
| Consumer Engagement (CE) | CE 1 | 0.857 | 0.891 | 0.9117 | 0.9382 | 0.7914 | |||
| CE 2 | 0.870 | 0.883 | |||||||
| CE 3 | 0.885 | 0.883 | |||||||
| CE 4 | 0.868 | 0.886 | |||||||
| Emotional Energy (EE) | EE1 | 0.902 | 0.909 | 0.9299 | 0.9501 | 0.8263 | |||
| EE2 | 0.904 | 0.906 | |||||||
| EE3 | 0.909 | 0.903 | |||||||
| EE4 | 0.884 | 0.916 | |||||||
| Cultural Perception (CP) | CP1 | 0.689 | 0.846 | 0.8739 | 0.9084 | 0.6649 | |||
| CP2 | 0.729 | 0.848 | |||||||
| CP3 | 0.682 | 0.841 | |||||||
| CP4 | 0.692 | 0.845 | |||||||
| CP5 | 0.614 | 0.855 | |||||||
| Affective Perception (AP) | AP1 | 0.626 | 0.789 | 0.8345 | 0.8897 | 0.6685 | |||
| AP2 | 0.667 | 0.791 | |||||||
| AP3 | 0.600 | 0.801 | |||||||
| AP4 | 0.735 | 0.782 | |||||||
| Consumer Trust (CT) | CT1 | 0.750 | 0.876 | 0.898 | 0.9246 | 0.7103 | |||
| CT2 | 0.740 | 0.874 | |||||||
| CT3 | 0.715 | 0.881 | |||||||
| CT4 | 0.739 | 0.876 | |||||||
| CT5 | 0.764 | 0.871 | |||||||
| Purchase Intention (PI) | PI1 | 0.843 | 0.926 | 0.9383 | 0.9531 | 0.8027 | |||
| PI2 | 0.856 | 0.924 | |||||||
| PI3 | 0.857 | 0.922 | |||||||
| PI4 | 0.849 | 0.924 | |||||||
| PI5 | 0.859 | 0.924 |
| LS | PP | AI | CE | EE | CP | AP | CT | PI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | 0.886 | ||||||||
| PP | 0.010 | 0.909 | |||||||
| AI | 0.032 | −0.070 | 0.863 | ||||||
| CE | 0.009 | −0.031 | −0.044 | 0.890 | |||||
| EE | 0.005 | 0.019 | −0.041 | 0.043 | 0.909 | ||||
| CP | 0.419 | 0.390 | 0.253 | 0.257 | 0.286 | 0.815 | |||
| AP | 0.350 | 0.511 | 0.131 | 0.359 | 0.037 | 0.569 | 0.818 | ||
| CT | 0.492 | 0.294 | 0.158 | 0.209 | 0.114 | 0.572 | 0.558 | 0.843 | |
| PI | 0.285 | 0.206 | 0.160 | 0.142 | 0.092 | 0.442 | 0.347 | 0.507 | 0.896 |
| LS | PP | AI | CE | EE | CP | AP | CT | PI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | |||||||||
| PP | 0.033 | ||||||||
| AI | 0.035 | 0.076 | |||||||
| CE | 0.029 | 0.033 | 0.052 | ||||||
| EE | 0.017 | 0.035 | 0.056 | 0.046 | |||||
| CP | 0.470 | 0.429 | 0.287 | 0.288 | 0.317 | ||||
| AP | 0.402 | 0.575 | 0.153 | 0.411 | 0.049 | 0.666 | |||
| CT | 0.545 | 0.319 | 0.177 | 0.231 | 0.124 | 0.645 | 0.645 | ||
| PI | 0.308 | 0.219 | 0.175 | 0.154 | 0.098 | 0.488 | 0.392 | 0.552 |
| Mean | SD | LS | PP | AI | CE | EE | CP | AP | CT | PI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | 3.259 | 0.571 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| PP | 2.969 | 0.666 | 0.010 | 1.000 | |||||||
| AI | 2.811 | 0.488 | 0.032 | −0.070 | 1.000 | ||||||
| CE | 3.195 | 0.578 | 0.009 | −0.031 | −0.044 | 1.000 | |||||
| EE | 2.513 | 0.638 | 0.005 | 0.019 | −0.041 | 0.043 | 1.000 | ||||
| CP | 2.529 | 0.444 | 0.419 | 0.390 | 0.253 | 0.257 | 0.286 | 1.000 | |||
| AP | 1.918 | 0.398 | 0.350 | 0.511 | 0.131 | 0.359 | 0.037 | 0.569 | 1.000 | ||
| CT | 2.553 | 0.500 | 0.492 | 0.294 | 0.158 | 0.209 | 0.114 | 0.572 | 0.558 | 1.000 | |
| PI | 1.907 | 0.605 | 0.285 | 0.206 | 0.160 | 0.142 | 0.092 | 0.442 | 0.347 | 0.507 | 1.000 |
| Hypothesis | Path | Path Coefficient (β) | S.E. | C.R. (t) | p | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1a | LS → CP | 0.313 | 0.019 | 16.317 | *** | Supported |
| H1b | LS → AP | 0.234 | 0.017 | 13.594 | *** | Supported |
| H2a | PP → CP | 0.273 | 0.016 | 16.586 | *** | Supported |
| H2b | PP → AP | 0.318 | 0.015 | 21.468 | *** | Supported |
| H3a | AI → CP | 0.266 | 0.023 | 11.815 | *** | Supported |
| H3b | AI → AP | 0.142 | 0.020 | 7.050 | *** | Supported |
| H4a | CE → CP | 0.205 | 0.019 | 10.800 | *** | Supported |
| H4b | CE → AP | 0.261 | 0.017 | 15.343 | *** | Supported |
| H5 | CP → CT | 0.254 | 0.046 | 5.583 | *** | Supported |
| H7 | AP → CT | 0.309 | 0.051 | 6.082 | *** | Supported |
| H9 | CT → PI | 0.442 | 0.051 | 8.586 | *** | Supported |
| Path | Total Effect | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | VAF(%) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | 0.292 *** | 0.023 (ns) | 0.269 | 92.12% | *** |
| PP | 0.200 *** | 0.024 (ns) | 0.176 | 88.00% | *** |
| AI | 0.214 *** | 0.067 (ns) | 0.147 | 68.69% | *** |
| CE | 0.161 *** | 0.020 (ns) | 0.141 | 87.58% | *** |
| Path | Indirect Effect | Bias-Corrected 95% CI | Conclusions | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | p | |||
| LS → CP → CT → PI | 0.044 | 0.029 | 0.061 | *** | Supported |
| LS → AP → CT → PI | 0.042 | 0.027 | 0.059 | *** | Supported |
| PP → CP → CT → PI | 0.039 | 0.026 | 0.054 | *** | Supported |
| PP → AP → CT → PI | 0.057 | 0.038 | 0.078 | *** | Supported |
| AI → CP → CT → PI | 0.036 | 0.023 | 0.052 | *** | Supported |
| AI → AP → CT → PI | 0.025 | 0.015 | 0.038 | *** | Supported |
| CE → CP → CT→ PI | 0.030 | 0.019 | 0.043 | *** | Supported |
| CE → AP → CT → PI | 0.047 | 0.031 | 0.066 | *** | Supported |
| Moderation Path | Interaction (β) | p-Value | Level of EE | Slope | Bias-Corrected 95% CI | Conclusions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| AI × EE → CP | 0.1553 | *** | High (+1 SD) | 0.3483 | 0.263 | 0.434 | AI × EE → CP |
| Low (−1 SD) | 0.1503 | 0.071 | 0.230 | ||||
| AI × EE → AP | 0.0938 | * | High (+1 SD) | 0.1726 | 0.090 | 0.256 | AI × EE → AP |
| Low (−1 SD) | 0.0530 | −0.024 | 0.130 | ||||
| CE × EE → CP | 0.1151 | ** | High (+1 SD) | 0.2585 | 0.189 | 0.328 | CE × EE → CP |
| Low (−1 SD) | 0.1117 | 0.039 | 0.184 | ||||
| CE × EE → AP | 0.1009 | ** | High (+1 SD) | 0.3081 | 0.245 | 0.371 | CE × EE → AP |
| Low (−1 SD) | 0.1795 | 0.114 | 0.245 | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, Q.; Xu, D.; Yuan, S.; Sun, G. Perception and Trust Construction in Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce: Evidence from Consumer Purchase Intention in Emerging Economies. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2026, 21, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070216
Wang M, Zhou Z, Chen Q, Xu D, Yuan S, Sun G. Perception and Trust Construction in Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce: Evidence from Consumer Purchase Intention in Emerging Economies. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2026; 21(7):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070216
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Miao, Zixuan Zhou, Qingjun Chen, Delian Xu, Shiqun Yuan, and Guangfan Sun. 2026. "Perception and Trust Construction in Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce: Evidence from Consumer Purchase Intention in Emerging Economies" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 21, no. 7: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070216
APA StyleWang, M., Zhou, Z., Chen, Q., Xu, D., Yuan, S., & Sun, G. (2026). Perception and Trust Construction in Rural Livestreaming E-Commerce: Evidence from Consumer Purchase Intention in Emerging Economies. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(7), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070216

