A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding in Agricultural Live Social E-Commerce
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesis
2.1. Live Social E-Commerce Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding
2.2. Chain Mediation of Emotional Attachment and FOMO
2.3. The Moderating Role of Social Distance
2.4. The Moderating Role of Immersion
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data Source
3.2. Selection of Variables
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Data Reliability Analysis
4.3. Regression Analysis
4.3.1. Mediating Effects Test
4.3.2. Moderating Effects Test
4.3.3. Robustness Checks
- (a)
- Using an alternative link function, the ordered logit model produced substantively identical coefficient signs and significance levels.
- (b)
- Relaxing the proportional-odds restriction, a generalized O-Probit (partial proportional odds) yielded consistent focal effects.
- (c)
- Regarding measurement treatment, treating the composite digital-hoarding-intention score as approximately continuous in an OLS model with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors led to the same substantive conclusions.
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Practical Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- van Bennekom, M.J.; Blom, R.M.; Vulink, N.; Denys, D. A case of digital hoarding. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2015210814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeten, G.; Sillence, E.; Neave, N. Digital hoarding behaviours: Underlying motivations and potential negative consequences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 85, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorpe, S.; Bolster, A.; Neave, N. Exploring aspects of the cognitive behavioural model of physical hoarding in relation to digital hoarding behaviours. Digit. Health 2019, 5, 2055207619882172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nutley, S.K.; Read, M.; Martinez, S.; Eichenbaum, J.; Nosheny, R.L.; Weiner, M.; Mackin, R.S.; Mathews, C.A. Hoarding symptoms are associated with higher rates of disability than other medical and psychiatric disorders across multiple domains of functioning. BMC Psychiatry 2022, 22, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pertusa, A.; Frost, R.O.; Mataix-Cols, D. ‘When hoarding is a symptom of OCD: A case series and implications for DSM-V’. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.D.; Watson, D. Hoarding and its relation to obsessive–compulsive disorder. Behav. Res. Ther. 2005, 43, 897–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKellar, K.; Sillence, E.; Neave, N.; Briggs, P. Digital accumulation behaviours and information management in the workplace: Exploring the tensions between digital data hoarding, organisational culture and policy. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2024, 43, 1206–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Z.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, W. Influencing Path of Consumer Digital Hoarding Behavior on E-Commerce Platforms. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fritze, M.P.; Marchand, A.; Eisingerich, A.B.; Benkenstein, M. Access-based services as substitutes for material possessions: The role of psychological ownership. J. Serv. Res. 2020, 23, 368–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dölarslan, E.Ş.; Koçak, A.; Walsh, P. Perceived barriers to entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of self-efficacy. J. Dev. Entrep. 2020, 25, 2050016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Wu, J.H.; Chang, Y.T.; Li, Q. The investigation of hedonic consumption, impulsive consumption and social sharing in e-commerce live-streaming videos. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Xi’an, China, 8–12 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Levin, I.; Mamlok, D. Culture and society in the digital age. Information 2021, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M.L.; Pires, G.D.; Rosenberger, P.J.; Leung, W.K.; Sharipudin, M.-N.S. The role of consumer-consumer interaction and consumer-brand interaction in driving consumer-brand engagement and behavioral intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blasco-Arcas, L.; Hernandez-Ortega, B.I.; Jimenez-Martinez, J. Engagement platforms: The role of emotions in fostering customer engagement and brand image in interactive media. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2016, 26, 559–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luxon, A.M.; Hamilton, C.E.; Bates, S.; Chasson, G.S. Pinning our possessions: Associations between digital hoarding and symptoms of hoarding disorder. J. Obs.-Compuls. Relat. Disord. 2019, 21, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q. Consumer engagement in live streaming commerce: Value co-creation and incentive mechanisms. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 81, 103987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Khatibi, A.; Tham, J. The impact of social media emotional contagion on the diffusion of cross-border e-commerce impulse buying behaviour. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 11, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Liang, X.; Xue, J.; Zhao, Y. Beneficial or troublesome? Revealing the double-edged effects of tourism live streaming affordances on viewers’ engagement. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2025, 42, 133–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sillence, E.; Dawson, J.A.; Brown, R.D.; McKellar, K.; Neave, N. Digital hoarding and personal use digital data. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2023, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, I.; Nadeem, A.; Saleem, M. Digital hoarding as predictor of mental health problems among undergraduate students. Online Media Soc. 2023, 4, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oravec, J.A. Digital (or virtual) hoarding: Emerging implications of digital hoarding for computing, psychology, and organization science. Int. J. Comput. Clin. Pract. (IJCCP) 2018, 3, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Song, T.; Li, L.; Jiang, W.; Gao, X.; Shu, L.; Liu, Y. Research on personal digital hoarding behaviors of college students based on personality traits theory: The mediating role of emotional attachment. Libr. Hi Tech 2024, 43, 1210–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaremohzzabieh, Z.; Abdullah, H.; Ahrari, S.; Abdullah, R.; Nor, S.M.M. Exploration of vulnerability factors of digital hoarding behavior among university students and the moderating role of maladaptive perfectionism. Digit. Health 2024, 10, 20552076241226962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.Q.; Wu, W.-Y.; Liao, Y.-K.; Phung, T.T.T. The extended SOR model investigating consumer impulse buying behavior in online shopping: A meta-analysis. J. Distrib. Sci. 2022, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Ding, J.; Akram, U.; Yue, X.; Chen, Y. An empirical study on the impact of e-commerce live features on consumers’ purchase intention: From the perspective of flow experience and social presence. Information 2021, 12, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadi, B.H.; Rahman, S.J.; Al-Mofraje, S.A. The Effect of Emotional Interaction on Purchasing Intention. World Bull. Soc. Sci. 2023, 19, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
- Riordan, B.C.; Cody, L.; Flett, J.A.M.; Conner, T.S.; Hunter, J.; Scarf, D. The development of a single item FoMO (fear of missing out) scale. Curr. Psychol. 2020, 39, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alutaybi, A.; Al-Thani, D.; McAlaney, J.; Ali, R. Combating fear of missing out (FoMO) on social media: The FoMO-R method. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 75, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trope, Y.; Liberman, N. Liberman Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 117, 440–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, F.-S.; Shao, J.-B.; Zhang, H. Is creative description always effective in purchase intention? The construal level theory as a moderating effect. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 619340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, N.C.; Nordahl, R.; Serafin, S. Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Hum. Technol. Interdiscip. J. Humans ICT Environ. 2016, 12, 108–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peukert, C.; Pfeiffer, J.; Meißner, M.; Pfeiffer, T.; Weinhardt, C. Shopping in virtual reality stores: The influence of immersion on system adoption. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2019, 36, 755–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, J.; Smith, A.N. Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Bus. Horizons 2016, 59, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heller, J.; Chylinski, M.; de Ruyter, K.; Keeling, D.I. Let Me Imagine That for You: Transforming the Retail Frontline through Augmenting Customer Mental Imagery Ability. J. Retail. 2019, 95, 94–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, M.; Wilbur, S. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1997, 6, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juan, M.C.; Pérez, D. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2009, 18, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, F.R.; Voss, K.E. An alternative approach to the measurement of emotional attachment. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brislin, R.W. The wording and translation of research instruments. In Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research; Lonner, W.J., Berry, J.W., Eds.; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1986; pp. 137–164. [Google Scholar]
- Jennett, C.; Cox, A.L.; Cairns, P.; Dhoparee, S.; Epps, A.; Tijs, T.; Walton, A. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2008, 66, 641–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigby, J.M.; Brumby, D.P.; Gould, S.J.; Cox, A.L. Development of a questionnaire to measure immersion in video media: The Film IEQ. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, Manchester, UK, 5–7 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cairns, P.; Cox, A.; Berthouze, N.; Dhoparee, S.; Jennett, C. Quantifying the experience of immersion in games. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science of Games and Gameplay workshop at Cognitive Science, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 26–29 July 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Safin, V.; Rachlin, H. A ratio scale for social distance. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2020, 114, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickson, J.P.; MacLachlan, D.L. MacLachlan. Social distance and shopping behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1990, 18, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neave, N.; Briggs, P.; McKellar, K.; Sillence, E. Digital hoarding behaviours: Measurement and evaluation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 96, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedera, D.; Lokuge, S. Is digital hoarding a mental disorder? Development of a construct for digital hoarding for future IS re-search. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), University of Southern Queensland, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–16 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hazlett, R.L.; Benedek, J. Measuring emotional valence to understand the user’s experience of software. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2007, 65, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Desmet, P. Measuring emotion: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Funology 2: From Usability to Enjoyment; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 391–404. [Google Scholar]
- Thomson, M.; MacInnis, D.J.; Park, C.W. The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands. J. Consum. Psychol. 2005, 15, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, L.; Zheng, X.; Lee, M.K.; Zhao, D. Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, D.; Choi, S.M.; Sohn, D. Building customer relationships in an electronic age: The role of interactivity of E-commerce Web sites. Psychol. Mark. 2008, 25, 602–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Liang, X.; Xie, T.; Wang, H. See now, act now: How to interact with customers to enhance social commerce engagement? Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Variable | No. | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Emotional attachment | EA1 | Xie X et al. (2024) [1] Jiménez F R et al. (2014) [39] Thomson M et al. (2005) [40] |
| EA2 | ||
| EA3 | ||
| EA4 | ||
| Fear of missing out | FOMO1 | Riordan, Benjamin C. et al. (2020) [27] Alutaybi, Aarif et al. (2020) [28] |
| FOMO2 | ||
| FOMO3 | ||
| Immersion | IMM1 | Jennett, Charlene et al. (2022) [41] Rigby, Jacob M. et al. (2019) [42] Cairns, Paul et al. (2006) [43] |
| IMM2 | ||
| IMM3 | ||
| Social distance | SD1 | Safin, Vasiliy & Howard Rachlin. (2020) [44] Dickson, John P., and Douglas L. MacLachlan. (1990) [45] |
| SD2 | ||
| SD3 | ||
| SD4 | ||
| Digital hoarding intention | INT1 | Neave N (2019) [46] Sedera D et al. (2018) [47] |
| INT2 | ||
| INT3 | ||
| Emotional interaction | MI1 | Hazlett, Richard L., and Joey Benedek. (2007) [48] Desmet, Pieter. (2018) [49] |
| MI2 | ||
| MI3 | ||
| MI4 |
| Basic Information | Category | Sample Size | Composition Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 124 | 38.5% |
| Female | 198 | 61.5% | |
| Age | 18–25 years old | 158 | 49.10% |
| 26–30 years old | 59 | 18.30% | |
| 31–40 years old | 61 | 18.90% | |
| 41–50 years old | 36 | 11.20% | |
| 51–60 years old | 7 | 2.20% | |
| Above 60 years old | 1 | 0.30% | |
| Educational | Junior high school and below | 3 | 0.90% |
| High School | 19 | 5.90% | |
| University college | 44 | 13.70% | |
| Undergraduate | 213 | 66.10% | |
| Postgraduate and above | 43 | 13.40% | |
| Frequency of live social e-commerce engagement (including watching, participating in live streams) | Rarely participate in live social e-commerce events | 50 | 15.50% |
| Participate in a live social e-commerce event once every few days | 130 | 40.40% | |
| Engage in one live social e-commerce per day | 102 | 31.70% | |
| Engage in live social e-commerce several times a day | 40 | 12.40% |
| Items | Number | Mean | Standard Deviation | Cronbach’s Alpha | AVE | CR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA | 4 | 3.38 | 1.18 | 0.8716 | 0.706 | 0.811 |
| FOMO | 3 | 3.50 | 0.89 | 0.8082 | 0.587 | 0.8628 |
| IMM | 3 | 4.03 | 0.72 | 0.8080 | 0.903 | 0.900 |
| SD | 4 | 3.33 | 1.19 | 0.9352 | 0.9854 | 0.9286 |
| INT | 4 | 3.87 | 0.85 | 0.8576 | 1.1926 | 0.9213 |
| MI | 4 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 1.0496 | 0.932 |
| Variable | VIF | 1/VIF |
|---|---|---|
| EA | 2.74 | 0.364 |
| SD | 2.36 | 0.424 |
| FOMO | 2.30 | 0.436 |
| IMM | 2.18 | 0.458 |
| MI | 2.11 | 0.474 |
| Age | 1.11 | 0.898 |
| Edu | 1.06 | 0.941 |
| Sex | 1.02 | 0.976 |
| Mean VIF | 1.86 | - |
| Model | Factors | χ2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | TLI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex Factor | MI, EA, FOMO, SD, IMM, INT | 2.65 | 0.072 | 0.049 | 0.953 | 0.942 |
| Five Factor | MI, EA, FOMO, SD, (IMM + INT) | 3.3147 | 0.085 | 0.059 | 0.916 | 0.900 |
| Four Factor | MI, EA, FOMO, (IMM + INT) | 3.677 | 0.091 | 0.057 | 0.910 | 0.890 |
| Three Factor | (MI + EA), (FOMO + SD), (IMM + INT) | 5.959 | 0.124 | 0.100 | 0.812 | 0.786 |
| Two Factor | (MI + SD + IMM), (FOMO + EA + INT) | 7.803 | 0.146 | 0.119 | 0.739 | 0.707 |
| One Factor | (MI + SD + IMM + FOMO + EA + INT) | 8.60 | 0.154 | 0.104 | 0.707 | 0.672 |
| INT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
| MI | 0.9930 *** (0.1076) | 0.6532 *** (0.1325) | |||
| EA | 0.6746 *** (0.0832) | 0.3199 *** (0.0986) | |||
| FOMO | 0.8068 *** (0.0845) | 0.3818 *** (0.1034) | |||
| Sex | 0.2827 (0.1174) | 0.2940 *** (0.1009) | 0.3393 *** (0.0833) | 0.2784 * (0.1104) | 0.3447 ** (0.1108) |
| Age | −0.2735 (0.4903) | −0.7883 (0.0535) | 0.0261 (0.5374) | 0.0701 (0.0520) | 0.0110 (0.0529) |
| Edu | −0.4095 (0.0771) | −0.3853 (0.7937) | 0.0351 (0.8805) | 0.0419 (0.1020) | 0.0337 (0.0862) |
| Observations | 322 | 322 | 322 | 322 | 322 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.0046 | 0.0871 | 0.0836 | 0.0901 | 0.1348 |
| Wald chi2 | 8.47 | 110.12 | 71.24 | 106.11 | 171.05 |
| EA | FOMO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| SD × EA | 0.1449 * (0.0715) | ||
| SD × MI | 0.2074 *** (0.0694) | 0.1342 * (0.7571) | |
| SD | 0.3419 *** (0.0694) | 0.8854 *** (0.0952) | 0.5699 *** (0.7731) |
| MI | 0.4750 *** (0.9525) | 0.6426 *** (0.126) | |
| EA | 0.7980 *** (0.121) | ||
| Controls | YES | YES | YES |
| Observations | 322 | 322 | 322 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.1671 | 0.1566 | 0.137 |
| Wald chi2 | 152.11 | 118.5 | 135.51 |
| INT | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | (9) | (10) | (11) |
| IMM × FOMO | 0.2672 *** (0.7507) | ||
| IMM × EA | 0.2424 *** (0.0733) | ||
| IMM × MI | 0.2280 *** (0.0865) | ||
| MI | 0.5135 *** (0.1362) | ||
| IMM | 1.0518 *** (0.0894) | 1.0642 *** (0.128) | 0.9325 *** (0.1362) |
| FOMO | 0.4924 *** (0.0863) | ||
| EA | 0.4203 *** (0.0898) | ||
| Controls | YES | YES | YES |
| Observations | 322 | 322 | 322 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.1499 | 0.1477 | 0.1291 |
| Wald chi2 | 151.03 | 152.45 | 175.63 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yue, Z.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, X. A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding in Agricultural Live Social E-Commerce. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040331
Yue Z, Zhong L, Zhang W, Zheng X. A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding in Agricultural Live Social E-Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2025; 20(4):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040331
Chicago/Turabian StyleYue, Zhikun, Linling Zhong, Wang Zhang, and Xungang Zheng. 2025. "A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding in Agricultural Live Social E-Commerce" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20, no. 4: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040331
APA StyleYue, Z., Zhong, L., Zhang, W., & Zheng, X. (2025). A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Emotional Interaction and Consumer Digital Hoarding in Agricultural Live Social E-Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040331

