Testimonials

What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
 

The turnaround time of MDPI journals is good, and the editorial team are very prompt in dealing with inquiries related to the submitted manuscript. The quality of feedback from peer [...] Read more.

The overall experience was excellent. The reviewing and editing services were both responsive and highly supportive, contributing to a smooth publication process. Highly recommend. [...] Read more.

Reliable and honest editors. Cooperativeness in the manuscript revision process. Understanding and flexibility in communication. High scientific level and rigor. It promotes original and valuable results and their critical analysis. [...] Read more.

In the last decade it is my reference publisher, where I have published most of my research works, and I have not had the slightest problem, in any sense. [...] Read more.

I have been working with MDPI for some time, and I think I can give an objective opinion about this publisher. The publishing process is simple and based on clear [...] Read more.

I had a positive experience publishing with MDPI! The submission process was streamlined and efficient, with clear guidance at each stage. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, which made [...] Read more.

I encourage any academic who has not published with MDPI before to try the process at least once. In terms of leadtime, responsiveness, and the right balance of power between [...] Read more.

Excellent following-up and helpful process on publication of a scientific article. [...] Read more.

The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, [...] Read more.

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team [...] Read more.

The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of [...] Read more.

There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for [...] Read more.

I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They [...] Read more.

I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding. [...] Read more.

I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were [...] Read more.

The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow. [...] Read more.

I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional [...] Read more.

Fast process with great and easy communication with the editorial team. We do not feel lost and abandoned like in other major publishers, where it takes so much effort and [...] Read more.

The provided assistance by the responsible personnel of MDPI in the development of a Special Issue has been very efficient. [...] Read more.

The reviewing process for all the five papers that I have reviewed was easy and all the steps were clearly explained on the platform. [...] Read more.

Displaying testimonial 1-20 on page 1 of 3.
Go to page     1 2 3 chevron_right
Back to TopTop