Testimonials
What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
Reliable and honest editors. Cooperativeness in the manuscript revision process. Understanding and flexibility in communication. High scientific level and rigor. It promotes original and valuable results and their critical analysis.
[...] Read more.
Reliable and honest editors. Cooperativeness in the manuscript revision process. Understanding and flexibility in communication. High scientific level and rigor. It promotes original and valuable results and their critical analysis. Good guidance in the process of revising the manuscript and high standards of editing and presentation.
Article in Energies:
A Comprehensive Review of Multi-Use Platforms for Renewable Energy and Aquaculture Integration
Less
I have been working with MDPI for some time, and I think I can give an objective opinion about this publisher. The publishing process is simple and based on clear
[...] Read more.
I have been working with MDPI for some time, and I think I can give an objective opinion about this publisher. The publishing process is simple and based on clear criteria. The publisher ensures the highest standards in terms of the review process and evaluation of submitted manuscripts. New features and tools are constantly being developed to limit unethical behavior in science. For me, cooperation with MDPI is an honor and a great pleasure.
Article in Energies:
Municipal Solid Waste as a Renewable Energy Source: Advances in Thermochemical Conversion Technologies and Environmental Impacts
Less
I had a positive experience publishing with MDPI! The submission process was streamlined and efficient, with clear guidance at each stage. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, which made
[...] Read more.
I had a positive experience publishing with MDPI! The submission process was streamlined and efficient, with clear guidance at each stage. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, which made the peer review process smooth and constructive. I appreciated the transparency and speed of the review process, as it allowed me to quickly address feedback and finalize my paper. Overall, MDPI’s focus on open access and rapid publication is fantastic, and I’d gladly work with them again for future projects!
Article in Energies:
The Role of Lightweight AI Models in Supporting a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy: A Systematic Review
Less
I encourage any academic who has not published with MDPI before to try the process at least once. In terms of leadtime, responsiveness, and the right balance of power between
[...] Read more.
I encourage any academic who has not published with MDPI before to try the process at least once. In terms of leadtime, responsiveness, and the right balance of power between authors, reviewers, and editors, publishing with MDPI is truly a refreshing experience.
Article in Energies:
From Aggregate Production Planning to Aggregate Energy Industrial Consumption Plans
Less
Excellent following-up and helpful process on publication of a scientific article.
[...] Read more.
The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review,
[...] Read more.
The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, and publishers must find a way to properly value it. My experience in this regard with MDPI publications is very positive.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team
[...] Read more.
My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team is responsive and supportive. This facilitates a smooth and rewarding review experience, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of
[...] Read more.
The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of MDPI.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for
[...] Read more.
There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for major revisions, which was very good; it provides deadlines similar to other journals for minor revisions. After acceptance, it was published online within 3 to 5 days, which is quite amazing.
Article in Energies:
The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model
Less
I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They
[...] Read more.
I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They care that the review is appropriate, fast, and reliable. They recognise its importance and demonstrate it.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.
[...] Read more.
I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were
[...] Read more.
I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were handled promptly and professionally, and this greatly contributed to a very satisfactory publishing experience for us as the authors. I highly recommend the journal to any authors wishing to publish open access.
Article in Energies:
Demand-Side Management as a Network Planning Tool: Review of Drivers, Benefits and Opportunities for South Africa
Less
The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow.
[...] Read more.
I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional
[...] Read more.
I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional team. In addition, there is a very good and stimulating system of vouchers and bonuses. For this reason, I no longer use other publishers for magazine publications. Very fast manuscript processing and review process. Maximum service and support from the technical team.
Article in Energies:
Short-Term Hydro-Thermal-Solar Scheduling with CCGT Based on Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm
Less
The reviewing process for all the five papers that I have reviewed was easy and all the steps were clearly explained on the platform.
[...] Read more.
The reviewing process for all the five papers that I have reviewed was easy and all the steps were clearly explained on the platform.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
Displaying testimonial 1-20 on page 1 of 3.