Testimonials

The turnaround time of MDPI journals is good, and the editorial team are very prompt in dealing with inquiries related to the submitted manuscript. The quality of feedback from peer reviewers is also great. As a whole, my team has had a good experience with MDPI journals.

Article in Energies: Strengthening Power Systems for Net Zero: A Review of the Role of Synchronous Condensers and Emerging Challenges

Less

The overall experience was excellent. The reviewing and editing services were both responsive and highly supportive, contributing to a smooth publication process. Highly recommend.

Article in Energies: Review and Evaluation of Multi-Agent Control Applications for Energy Management in Buildings

Less

Reliable and honest editors. Cooperativeness in the manuscript revision process. Understanding and flexibility in communication. High scientific level and rigor. It promotes original and valuable results and their critical analysis. Good guidance in the process of revising the manuscript and high standards of editing and presentation.

Article in Energies: A Comprehensive Review of Multi-Use Platforms for Renewable Energy and Aquaculture Integration

Less

In the last decade it is my reference publisher, where I have published most of my research works, and I have not had the slightest problem, in any sense.

Article in Energies: Internal Combustion Engines and Carbon-Neutral Fuels: A Perspective on Emission Neutrality in the European Union

Less

I have been working with MDPI for some time, and I think I can give an objective opinion about this publisher. The publishing process is simple and based on clear criteria. The publisher ensures the highest standards in terms of the review process and evaluation of submitted manuscripts. New features and tools are constantly being developed to limit unethical behavior in science. For me, cooperation with MDPI is an honor and a great pleasure.

Article in Energies: Municipal Solid Waste as a Renewable Energy Source: Advances in Thermochemical Conversion Technologies and Environmental Impacts

Less

I had a positive experience publishing with MDPI! The submission process was streamlined and efficient, with clear guidance at each stage. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, which made the peer review process smooth and constructive. I appreciated the transparency and speed of the review process, as it allowed me to quickly address feedback and finalize my paper. Overall, MDPI’s focus on open access and rapid publication is fantastic, and I’d gladly work with them again for future projects!

Article in Energies: The Role of Lightweight AI Models in Supporting a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy: A Systematic Review

Less

I encourage any academic who has not published with MDPI before to try the process at least once. In terms of leadtime, responsiveness, and the right balance of power between authors, reviewers, and editors, publishing with MDPI is truly a refreshing experience.

Article in Energies: From Aggregate Production Planning to Aggregate Energy Industrial Consumption Plans

Less

Excellent following-up and helpful process on publication of a scientific article.

Article in Energies: Simulation of a Continuous Pyrolysis Reactor for a Heat Self-Sufficient Process and Liquid Fuel Production

Less

The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, and publishers must find a way to properly value it. My experience in this regard with MDPI publications is very positive.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team is responsive and supportive. This facilitates a smooth and rewarding review experience, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of MDPI.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for major revisions, which was very good; it provides deadlines similar to other journals for minor revisions. After acceptance, it was published online within 3 to 5 days, which is quite amazing.

Article in Energies: The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model

Less

I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They care that the review is appropriate, fast, and reliable. They recognise its importance and demonstrate it.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were handled promptly and professionally, and this greatly contributed to a very satisfactory publishing experience for us as the authors. I highly recommend the journal to any authors wishing to publish open access.

Article in Energies: Demand-Side Management as a Network Planning Tool: Review of Drivers, Benefits and Opportunities for South Africa

Less

The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow.

Article in Energies: A Polynomial Synthesis Approach to Design and Control an LCL-Filter-Based PWM Rectifier with Extended Functions Validated by SIL Simulations

Less

I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional team. In addition, there is a very good and stimulating system of vouchers and bonuses. For this reason, I no longer use other publishers for magazine publications. Very fast manuscript processing and review process. Maximum service and support from the technical team.

Article in Energies: Short-Term Hydro-Thermal-Solar Scheduling with CCGT Based on Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm

Less

Fast process with great and easy communication with the editorial team. We do not feel lost and abandoned like in other major publishers, where it takes so much effort and time to contact anyone.

Article in Energies: Forecasting East and West Coast Gasoline Prices with Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms

Less

The provided assistance by the responsible personnel of MDPI in the development of a Special Issue has been very efficient.

Special Issue in Energies: Development of Electrical Machines: Latest Studies and Future Prospects

Less

The reviewing process for all the five papers that I have reviewed was easy and all the steps were clearly explained on the platform.

Reviewer of Energies

Less