Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (63)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = trisomy 18

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 723 KiB  
Review
Prenatal Screening for Chromosomal Defects
by Veronika Frisova
Reprod. Med. 2025, 6(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6020015 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1698
Abstract
Chromosomal defects are a significant cause of perinatal death and childhood disability, occurring in 3.6–6.0 per 1000 births in unscreened populations. Common chromosomal defects include trisomy 21, 18, and 13, triploidy, and sex chromosome abnormalities. Screening for these defects began in the mid-1960s [...] Read more.
Chromosomal defects are a significant cause of perinatal death and childhood disability, occurring in 3.6–6.0 per 1000 births in unscreened populations. Common chromosomal defects include trisomy 21, 18, and 13, triploidy, and sex chromosome abnormalities. Screening for these defects began in the mid-1960s with the advent of amniocentesis, and various methods have since been developed to improve screening performance. Initial screening was based solely on maternal and gestational age, a method incorporated later into all subsequent screening methods giving an a priori background risk. This a priori background risk, which is further refined by maternal serum biochemistry, results of ultrasound examinations, and most recently, results of non-invasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA in maternal blood. This paper will describe methods of screening for all chromosomal defects and their performance. Unlike most reviews, this paper covers not only screening tests for Down syndrome, but also screening methods for the other most common and less common chromosomal defects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 847 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review of Accuracy Differences in NIPT Methods for Common Aneuploidy Screening
by Tamas Marton, Zsófia R. Erdélyi, Minori Takai, Balázs Mészáros, Dorina Supák, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Kukor, Zoltan Herold, Beata Hargitai and Sándor Valent
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2813; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082813 - 18 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1681
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a widely used method for screening common fetal aneuploidies due to its high sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional screening methods. With various NIPT technologies available, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microarray, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a widely used method for screening common fetal aneuploidies due to its high sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional screening methods. With various NIPT technologies available, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microarray, and rolling circle amplification (RCA), understanding the accuracy and reliability of each method is critical for clinical decision-making. However, comprehensive evaluations comparing the performance of these NIPT methods, especially in terms of predictive values for trisomy detection, remain limited. A systematic review of the difference in accuracy of the different NIPT methods used for common aneuploidy screening. Methods: A systematic review of former clinical studies using different NIPT methods, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS), a targeted method of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microarray and rolling circle amplification (RCA). We collected data from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane library from the last 20 years, between 2003 January and 2023 October, without any language, search filter or publication type restrictions. Results: Two authors selected twenty articles including twenty-one studies to perform the systematic review. In these studies, altogether 92,164 pregnant women were tested by genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). We extracted data on true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values from each study, and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) from them. We collected data regarding trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13) detection from all studies. Conclusions: As a conclusion, for the detection of common fetal trisomies, different methods of NIPT perform similarly in terms of clinical sensitivity, specificity and NPV. However, the tests utilizing SNP and RCA had lower PPV values than other NIPT methods. Our research indicates all NIPT methods showed greater sensitivity for the detection of T21, above 97%, than traditional screening tests. For T18 detection, the targeted method with the microarray had a lower sensitivity compared to other tests. The SNP and the microarray-based test had high PPV, whilst the other tests, utilizing WGS, and the test with RCA had quite low PPV. Regarding T13 detection, all of the tests performed similarly in terms of clinical sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV (with one exception—one of the tests using WGS had lower PPV). According to these results, there was no significant difference between the methods of NIPT, such as WGS, SNPs, microarray, and RCA, used to detect common trisomies, but the variation in PPV underlines the importance of invasive tests to derive positive NIPT results. We suggest that NIPT combined with US screening for structural abnormalities could further improve the utility of the non-invasive tests in pregnancy. This is the first independent systematic review into the efficacy of the different NIPT methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7140 KiB  
Review
Clinical Significance and Prognosis of Prenatal Diagnosis of Large Umbilical Cord Cysts—A Review Triggered by a Clinical Case
by Șerban Nastasia, Adina Elena Nenciu, Manuela Cristina Russu, Adrian Valeriu Neacșu, Iuliana Ceaușu and Nicoleta Adelina Achim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2564; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082564 - 8 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1081
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Prevalence of umbilical cord cysts is largely unknown, mainly due to small dimensions and to the fact that only placental and fetal insertion of the umbilical cord are usually assessed. Older studies report a total prevalence of about 3%, regardless of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Prevalence of umbilical cord cysts is largely unknown, mainly due to small dimensions and to the fact that only placental and fetal insertion of the umbilical cord are usually assessed. Older studies report a total prevalence of about 3%, regardless of the size. To date, no correlation between the gestational age, the size of the cyst at the moment of diagnosis and pregnancy prognosis can be made. Methods: We managed a case of a large umbilical cyst diagnosed in the first trimester. As our experience with this pathology was limited, we performed a systematic review in order to find out the optimal management. Results: We report a case of a large umbilical cord cyst that ended in fetal demise at 13 weeks in the absence of any chromosomal and structural anomalies. Our results differ from what was expected from our literature review. Sixteen papers were included in our analysis. According to the selected papers, single cysts are more frequent than multiple cysts (79% single cysts). The mean value of the maximum diameter of the cyst was 32 mm, and there was no difference in number considering the localization of the cyst. Considering the cases in which genetic testing was performed, there were 22.76% modified results. The most frequent genetic disorder was trisomy 18 (53.57% from the modified results). Conclusions: Large umbilical cord cysts are correlated with uncertain prognosis. We made the conclusion that large umbilical cord cystic lesions might have an unfavorable prognosis. Although there are case series that have shown an unproblematic evolution of the pregnancy, large umbilical cysts could be associated with increased risk of fetal anomalies and intrauterine fetal death. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 455 KiB  
Article
Pilot Programme for Keratoconus Screening and Management in Adolescents with Down Syndrome
by Barry Power, Kirk A. J. Stephenson, Diana Malata, Conor Murphy, Barry Quill, Fiona McGrane, Eleanor Molloy and William Power
Diagnostics 2025, 15(6), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060683 - 10 Mar 2025
Viewed by 810
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To screen a group of adolescents with Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) for keratoconus and assess the feasibility of setting up a national screening service. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with Down Syndrome between 9 and 18 years of age attended our pilot [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To screen a group of adolescents with Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) for keratoconus and assess the feasibility of setting up a national screening service. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with Down Syndrome between 9 and 18 years of age attended our pilot keratoconus screening clinic. We recorded demographics, medical history, risk factors, best-corrected distance visual acuity, clinical examination results and corneal tomography results. The presence of keratoconus was confirmed by one of three corneal specialists based on clinical and tomographic findings. Tomographic analysis included zonal Kmax, thinnest point, inferior–superior asymmetry (IS Values), Belin/Ambrosio deviation value (BAD-D) and anterior and posterior elevation maps. Results: Early keratoconus was detected on tomography in 8 out of 54 eyes (15%) at the first review. These eyes were listed for crosslinking. The mean age of diagnosis was 14.6. Corneas in the Down Syndrome screening group were thinner and steeper (mean central corneal thickness (CCT) 479 µm vs. 536 µm and mean Kmax 49.2D vs. 45.8D, respectively) than healthy, age-matched controls from the literature. Conclusions: Fifteen percent of eyes (5 out of 27 patients) screened had tomographic evidence of keratoconus requiring treatment at their first review. We found an increased incidence of keratoconus in European individuals with Down Syndrome. Screening this vulnerable, high-risk population with corneal tomography can diagnose early keratoconus and enable corneal crosslinking to safely and effectively stabilise the disease. We advocate tomographic keratoconus screening for individuals with Down Syndrome in their mid-teens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Screening and Diagnostic Testing of Keratoconus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 830 KiB  
Article
Micrognathia as a Diagnosis Marker for the Prenatal Identification of Edwards Syndrome
by Cristina-Crenguţa Albu, Anca Daniela Brăila, Cristian-Viorel Poalelungi, Laurenţiu-Camil Bohîltea, Andreea-Mariana Bănățeanu, Constantin Marian Damian, Laurențiu Mihai Dîră and Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu
Biomedicines 2025, 13(3), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030573 - 25 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1518
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Edwards syndrome, or trisomy 18, is a severe chromosomal disorder marked by numerous congenital anomalies, including micrognathia. This study evaluated the diagnostic significance of micrognathia as a prenatal indicator for trisomy 18 through a case series involving five confirmed instances. Methods: Ultrasound [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Edwards syndrome, or trisomy 18, is a severe chromosomal disorder marked by numerous congenital anomalies, including micrognathia. This study evaluated the diagnostic significance of micrognathia as a prenatal indicator for trisomy 18 through a case series involving five confirmed instances. Methods: Ultrasound assessments concentrated on the inferior facial angle (IFA) and the jaw index, supplemented by Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) and karyotyping. Results: Micrognathia was consistently identified alongside other anomalies, reinforcing its reliability as an ultrasound marker for trisomy 18. Conclusions: The findings highlight the critical nature of early detection for informed parental counseling and effective pregnancy management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1819 KiB  
Article
NIPT Integration as a Patient-Paid Prenatal Screening Option—Observations and Challenges from a Bulgarian Genetic Counseling Center
by Dinnar Yahya, Mari Hachmeriyan, Milena Stoyanova and Mariya Levkova
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010003 - 29 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1372
Abstract
Background: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test’s usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would [...] Read more.
Background: NIPT is a widely implemented method for prenatal screening of chromosomal disorders. Its introduction initiated the practice of counseling women pre- and post-analytically. Since the test’s usage is established in different conditions, comparing data from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds would be of scientific value. Our study is the first to describe NIPT integration in Bulgaria. We aimed to evaluate current trends in demand and referral, the frequency of high-risk results, cases of fetal sex discrepancies and their impacts, as well as commonly held misconceptions during genetic counseling. We also address issues and necessary general prophylaxis and prenatal care improvements. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on the pregnant women who received GC for NIPT in our genetic center between 2016 and 2023. We separated this period into two due to a significant difference in the test’s price. A total of 635 women were included with their referral indications, panel width preference, fetal sex, and SCA. We assessed cases of fetal sex discrepancy, high-risk pregnancies, late NIPT (after GW 18), and commonly occurring issues and misconceptions. Results: We observed a significant increase in the demand for NIPT—63 women for 2016–2020 versus 572 for 2021–2023. The leading indications were supervision of normal pregnancy (50.4%) and advanced maternal age (>35 years) (31.2%). As for late NIPT, the most common indications for this late testing were high risk from a maternal serum screening test (33.3%) and anxiety (25%). Further, 1.1% of results were high-risk for trisomy 18 and 21 and monosomy X. We reviewed two cases of fetal sex discrepancy (0.3%) and common misconceptions twice more during pre-test GC. Conclusions: This single-center experience shows that demand for NIPT is exponentially growing, especially as a normal pregnancy screening method. Delivering thorough education to the community and guaranteeing outstanding care during genetic counseling sessions is crucial for fostering informed decisions and overall well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1541 KiB  
Article
Chromosomal Abnormalities in Miscarriages and Maternal Age: New Insights from the Study of 7118 Cases
by Anna A. Pendina, Mikhail I. Krapivin, Olga G. Chiryaeva, Lubov’ I. Petrova, Elizaveta P. Pashkova, Arina V. Golubeva, Andrei V. Tikhonov, Alla S. Koltsova, Ekaterina D. Trusova, Dmitrii A. Staroverov, Andrey S. Glotov, Olesya N. Bespalova and Olga A. Efimova
Cells 2025, 14(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14010008 - 26 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3717
Abstract
Chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo are the most common cause of first-trimester pregnancy loss. In this single-center study, we assessed the frequency and the spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages for each year of maternal age from 23 to 44. Cytogenetic data were [...] Read more.
Chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo are the most common cause of first-trimester pregnancy loss. In this single-center study, we assessed the frequency and the spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages for each year of maternal age from 23 to 44. Cytogenetic data were obtained by conventional karyotyping of 7118 miscarriages in women with naturally conceived pregnancies. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 67.25% of miscarriages. The total incidence of chromosomal abnormalities increased with maternal aging; however, its average change for a one-year increase in maternal age differed between age spans, equaling 0.704% in the span from 23 to 37 years and 2.095% in the span from 38 to 44 years. At the age of 38 years, the incidence rate surged sharply by 14.79% up to 79.01% and then increased progressively up to 94% in 44-year-old women. The spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages was the same for each year of maternal age from 23 to 44 years. However, the proportions of particular chromosomal abnormalities differed between karyotypically abnormal miscarriages in younger and older women. The proportions of trisomy 16, polyploidy, monosomy X, mosaic aneuploidies, and structural rearrangements decreased with increasing maternal age. In contrast, the proportions of multiple aneuploidies and regular trisomies 13, 15, 18, 21, and 22 showed an upward trend with maternal aging. To summarize, despite the increase in the total incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages with maternal aging, the rate of change differs for younger and older women, being three times lower in the former than in the latter. Moreover, the proportion of some abnormalities in karyotypically abnormal miscarriages shows a steady growth, whereas the proportion of others becomes increasingly low with maternal aging, most probably due to the age-dependent prevalence of different molecular and cellular defects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 520 KiB  
Article
Prenatal Predictors and Early Postnatal Outcomes in Fetuses Diagnosed with Tricuspid Atresia
by Ozge Kahramanoglu, Omer Gokhan Eyisoy and Oya Demirci
Diagnostics 2024, 14(24), 2855; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242855 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1120
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prenatal course and early postnatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with tricuspid atresia and to identify predictors of survival. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 25 fetuses diagnosed with tricuspid atresia in a single tertiary referral center, evaluating prenatal [...] Read more.
Objective: To assess the prenatal course and early postnatal outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with tricuspid atresia and to identify predictors of survival. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 25 fetuses diagnosed with tricuspid atresia in a single tertiary referral center, evaluating prenatal echocardiographic features and postnatal outcomes. Results: A total of 4 of 29 initially diagnosed fetuses were excluded due to changes in diagnosis or loss to follow-up, leaving 25 fetuses for analysis. Of these, 16 (64%) had concordant VA alignment, 8 (32%) had discordant VA connections, and 1 had a double-outlet left ventricle (DOLV). Pulmonary stenosis was observed in 13 fetuses, and 10 (40%) had extracardiac anomalies. Genetic testing, performed in 5 cases, identified a chromosomal anomaly in one case (trisomy 18). Overall, three pregnancies were terminated due to severe associated anomalies. Among the 22 liveborn infants, survival at 12 months was 72%. Restrictive ventricular septal defect (VSD) and the high ductus venosus pulsatility index were significantly associated with lower survival (p = 0.021 and p = 0.034, respectively). Conclusions: Tricuspid atresia can be accurately diagnosed in utero with a thorough echocardiographic evaluation. Restrictive VSD and outflow tract obstructions are critical determinants of early survival, while abnormal DV Doppler patterns may serve as additional markers for adverse outcomes. More extensive studies are needed to validate these findings and improve prognostic counseling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Maternal–Fetal Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 806 KiB  
Article
Fetal Isolated Single Umbilical Artery (ISUA) and Its Role as a Marker of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes
by Ana María Cubo, Alicia Moreno, Mercedes Sánchez-Barba, María Ángeles Cabrero, Tatiana Costas, María O Rodríguez, María Estrella Hernández Hernández, Polán Ordás, Ana Villalba Yarza, Francisco Javier Goenaga and María Victoria Lapresa-Alcalde
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7749; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247749 - 18 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2462
Abstract
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is considered an ultrasound marker of anomalies. Although it may be present in about 0.5% to 6% of normal pregnancies, it has been linked with an increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR), as well as cardiac, genitourinary and [...] Read more.
Single umbilical artery (SUA) is considered an ultrasound marker of anomalies. Although it may be present in about 0.5% to 6% of normal pregnancies, it has been linked with an increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR), as well as cardiac, genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformations and chromosomal anomalies such as trisomies 21 and 18. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate whether the presence of isolated SUA (ISUA) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: A descriptive, observational and retrospective study was conducted, analyzing 1234 pregnancies (1157 normal gestations with a three-vessel cord and 77 cases of ISUA). Results: ISUA was associated with a lower gestational age (38 vs. 39 weeks) and a lower birth weight (3013 vs. 3183 g) when performing a univariate analysis. However, after performing a multivariate analysis adjusted for maternal age and BMI, the association between single umbilical artery (SUA) and lower birth weight could not be proven. No significant differences were found in the rate of malformations, genetic disorders, Apgar score, pH at birth or admissions in the neonatal ICU. Conclusions: ISUA is associated with a lower birth weight but does not increase the risk of prematurity or low-birth-weight-related neonatal admissions. Additionally, ISUA is not significantly associated with a lower gestational age, genetic disorders, fetal malformations, worse Apgar scores or lower pH values at birth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Prenatal Diagnosis and Maternal Fetal Medicine: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 264 KiB  
Article
A Decade of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for Chromosomal Abnormalities in Croatia: First National Monocentric Study to Inform Country’s Future Prenatal Care Strategy
by Petra Podobnik, Tomislav Meštrović, Aida Đorđević, Kristian Kurdija, Dženis Jelčić, Nina Ogrin, Ivan Bertović-Žunec, Beata Gebauer-Vuković, Grega Hočevar, Igor Lončar, Zlata Srebreniković, Petra Trobina, Marko Bitenc and Ivo Dumić-Čule
Genes 2024, 15(12), 1590; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121590 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2129
Abstract
Background: Chromosomal numerical and structural alterations are significant causes of various developmental disorders in foetuses. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has emerged as an effective screening tool for detecting common aneuploidies, aiding in the identification of individuals who may require further diagnostic work-up. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Chromosomal numerical and structural alterations are significant causes of various developmental disorders in foetuses. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has emerged as an effective screening tool for detecting common aneuploidies, aiding in the identification of individuals who may require further diagnostic work-up. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric observational study evaluates the usage patterns, test choices, turnaround times (TAT), and outcomes of NIPT between 2013 and 2023 on a sample of 2431 pregnant women at a special hospital offering outpatient services and comprehensive gynaecological/obstetric inpatient care. We analysed the trends in NIPT usage, high-risk results, prior screening procedures, as well as factors such as age, gestational age and in vitro fertilisation (IVF) status. NIPT was performed using cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) extracted from maternal plasma, followed by library construction, sequencing and result analysis. The sequencing results were aligned with reference genomes, and z-scores were calculated to assess the likelihood of aneuploidy. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The average age of women undergoing NIPT decreased from 36.1 years in 2013 to 33.01 years in 2023 (p = 0.0287), and mean TAT dropped from 12.44 days in 2013 to 7.08 days in 2023 (p = 0.0121), with the most substantial reduction occurring between 2013 and 2019. The study identified a stable rate of women who underwent IVF seeking prenatal testing, with no statistically significant difference between the first half and the second half of the analysed period (p = 0.2659). Among high-risk results, there were 39 chromosomal abnormalities detected, most of them belonging to trisomy 21 (59%). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the increasing efficiency and accessibility of NIPT in prenatal care in Croatia, while the significant reduction in TAT and the decreasing age of women undergoing NIPT reflect enhanced operational practices and broader acceptance. Introducing NIPT into the public healthcare system in the Republic of Croatia could improve equitable access to advanced prenatal care and enhance pregnancy outcomes. Future advancements in technology and genetic counselling will further enhance its role, requiring careful attention to ethical and regulatory considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
9 pages, 1312 KiB  
Case Report
Inherited Unbalanced Reciprocal Translocation with 18p11.32p11.21 Tetrasomy and 9q34.3 Trisomy in a Fetus Revealed by Cell-Free Fetal DNA (cffDNA) Testing: Cytogenetic and Cytogenomic Characterization in Prenatal Diagnosis
by Carmela Ardisia, Luigia De Falco, Giovanni Savarese, Raffaella Ruggiero, Teresa Suero, Nadia Petrillo, Monica Ianniello, Roberto Sirica, Alessio Mori, Davide Cino, Maria Barbato, Giuseppina Vitiello and Antonio Fico
Genes 2024, 15(11), 1464; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111464 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1518
Abstract
Background/Objective: Balanced reciprocal translocations are structural chromosomal anomalies that involve a mutual exchange of segments between two non-homologous chromosomes with a consequent 50–80% risk of conceiving fetuses with unbalanced chromosomal anomalies. This study describes a 37-year-old woman, at 13 + 5 weeks of [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Balanced reciprocal translocations are structural chromosomal anomalies that involve a mutual exchange of segments between two non-homologous chromosomes with a consequent 50–80% risk of conceiving fetuses with unbalanced chromosomal anomalies. This study describes a 37-year-old woman, at 13 + 5 weeks of gestation, who is a balanced reciprocal translocation 46,XX,t(9;18)(q34;q11.2) carrier, with a high-risk non-invasive prenatal screening test, NIPT, for chromosome 18 aneuploidy. Methods: The highlighted aneuploidy was characterized with cytogenetic, FISH and SNP-array techniques. Results: Cytogenetic analysis, performed on flask-cultured amniocytes, indicated a 48,XX,+2mar karyotype on 50 metaphases. SNP array analysis showed a 15.3 Mb duplication of chromosome 18p (arr[hg19]18p11.32-p11.21(12,842-15,303,932)x4), consistent with a partial tetrasomy 18p, and a 926 kbp duplication of chromosome 9q (arr[GRCh37]9q34.3(140,118,286-141,044,489)x3), consistent with partial trisomy 9q. FISH analysis with a 9q34.3 probe was performed on flask-cultured amniocytes’ metaphases, highlighting the presence of a third signal on one of the two marker chromosomes (18p11.32-p11.21). Conclusions: The evidence of such partial aneuploidies suggests that different mutational events may be possible at meiotic segregation or probably post-meiotic segregation. The results obtained highlight the high sensitivity of the screening test, NIPT, with massive parallel sequencing, and the usefulness of cytogenetics, cytogenomics and molecular biology techniques, in synergy, to characterize and confirm positive NIPT results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Technologies and Resources for Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1225 KiB  
Article
Prenatal Diagnosis of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Study
by Anca Daniela Brăila, Constantin Marian Damian, Cristina-Crenguţa Albu, Oana Botoacă, Laurențiu Mihai Dȋră, Ştefan-Dimitrie Albu, Matei Georgian Brăila, Andreea-Mariana Bănățeanu, Cristian-Viorel Poalelungi and Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4804; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164804 - 15 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3273
Abstract
Cleft lip and/or palate are prevalent congenital anomalies. Early and accurate diagnosis allows proper case management. The Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between cleft lip and palate and other congenital anomalies. Methods: This study analyzed 17 [...] Read more.
Cleft lip and/or palate are prevalent congenital anomalies. Early and accurate diagnosis allows proper case management. The Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between cleft lip and palate and other congenital anomalies. Methods: This study analyzed 17 pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with cleft lip and palate. The investigations consisted of ultrasound examination, fetal karyotyping through amniocentesis, and family tree analysis. In the presence of an abnormal fetal karyotype, the parental karyotype was also indicated. Results: Of the 17 cases identified, 9 (52.94%) were syndromic and 8 (47.06%) were non-syndromic. The genetic syndromes identified in association with cleft lip and palate in this study included translocation syndrome (one case), Patau syndrome, trisomy 13 (seven cases), and Edwards syndrome, mosaic trisomy 18 (one case). Conclusions: A comprehensive approach ensures a thorough assessment and accurate diagnosis. Early detection and a multidisciplinary approach allow appropriate case management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 658 KiB  
Article
Performance of Massive Parallel Sequencing-Based Cell-Free DNA Testing in Compromised Pregnancies
by Maria Antolin, Guillermo Tarrasó, María Ángeles Sánchez, Alberto Plaja, Desiree Martínez-Cruz, Mar Xunclà, Neus Castells, Elena Carreras, Eduardo F. Tizzano and Elena García-Arumí
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4007; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144007 - 9 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1704
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-Invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is used as a universal or contingent test after prior risk assessment. Screening is mainly performed for common trisomies (T21, T13, T18), although other chromosomal anomalies may be detected. Our objective was to study the performance of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-Invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is used as a universal or contingent test after prior risk assessment. Screening is mainly performed for common trisomies (T21, T13, T18), although other chromosomal anomalies may be detected. Our objective was to study the performance of GWNIPT in the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancies in which an invasive prenatal study was performed and in early pregnancy losses, in comparison with the reference test. Method: VeriSeqTM NIPT Solution v2, a genome-wide NIPT (GWNIPT), was performed prior to invasive testing in fetal diagnostic study cases (FDS, n = 155) and in early pregnancy losses (EPL, n = 68). Results: In the FDS group, the diagnostic test (QFPCR, array and karyotype) detected anomalies in 32 pregnancies (21%), in twenty of them (61%) also detected by GWNIPT. Eleven of the twelve cases undetected by GWNIPT were balanced translocations (n = 4) or deletions/duplications <7 Mb (n = 7). In the EPL group, GWNIPT detected anomalies in 46% of cases (31/68) but comparison with reference test (QFPCR and karyotype) in products of conception (POC) was only possible in 18 cases. Concordant results between POC and GWNIPT test were obtained in 16 of the 18 cases. In EPL, with GWNIPT testing, common trisomies accounted for 25.8% of cases (8/31), rare trisomies 54.8% (17/31) and microdeletions/duplications 16.1% (5/31). Conclusions: The GWNIPT test may be useful in clinical practice in prenatal and in EPL’s genetic diagnosis when the appropriate sample is not available. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 226 KiB  
Communication
A Comparison of the Frequency of Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 Using Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing According to Diminished vs. Normal Egg Reserve and Age
by Brooke Neumann, Nicole Weitz, Jerome H. Check, Carrie Wilson, Ann Diantonio and Megan O’Neil
Reprod. Med. 2024, 5(2), 81-89; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5020009 - 4 Jun 2024
Viewed by 2801
Abstract
Background: This study’s aim was to determine whether diminished oocyte reserve (DOR) increases the risk of having a fetus with trisomy 13, 18, or 21 at 10 weeks as evaluated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the confounding effect of advanced [...] Read more.
Background: This study’s aim was to determine whether diminished oocyte reserve (DOR) increases the risk of having a fetus with trisomy 13, 18, or 21 at 10 weeks as evaluated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the confounding effect of advanced age. Methods: NIPT was undertaken in all pregnancies conceived through natural treatment or assisted reproductive technology that reached 10 weeks from conception with a viable fetus from one infertility center. Data were stratified according to serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/mL and ≥1 ng/mL. Results: No woman < 39 or with AMH ≥ 1 ng/mL showed trisomy 13, 18, or 21 by NIPT. Only women ≥ age 39 with DOR had one of these trisomies. Conclusions: Hopefully these data, coupled with other factors, e.g., etiology of infertility, age, insurance, or financial circumstances, and personal views of pregnancy termination, will aid patients with DOR when choosing treatment options, including natural conception, IVF-ET, IVF with pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, or transfer of fertilized donor eggs. Full article
12 pages, 1190 KiB  
Article
Re-Examination of PGT-A Detected Genetic Pathology in Compartments of Human Blastocysts: A Series of 23 Cases
by Andrei V. Tikhonov, Mikhail I. Krapivin, Olga V. Malysheva, Evgeniia M. Komarova, Arina V. Golubeva, Olga A. Efimova and Anna A. Pendina
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3289; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113289 - 3 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Background: In recent years, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) has become widespread in assisted reproduction. However, contrary to expectations, PGT-A does not significantly improve the clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. One of the underlying reasons is the discordance between the PGT-A [...] Read more.
Background: In recent years, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) has become widespread in assisted reproduction. However, contrary to expectations, PGT-A does not significantly improve the clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. One of the underlying reasons is the discordance between the PGT-A results and the true chromosomal constitution of the blastocyst. In this case series, we re-examined the PGT-A results in trophectoderm (TE) re-biopsies and in the two isolated blastocyst compartments—the TE and the inner cell mass (ICM). Methods: This study enrolled 23 human blastocysts from 17 couples who were referred for assisted reproduction. The blastocysts were unsuitable for uterine transfer due to the chromosomal imbalance revealed by PGT-A using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (n = 11) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) (n = 12). The re-examination of the PGT results involved two steps: (1) a TE re-biopsy with subsequent aCGH and (2) blastocyst separation into the TE and the ICM with a subsequent cell-by-cell analysis of each isolated compartment by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the DNA probes to chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, and 22 as well as to the PGT-A detected imbalanced chromosomes. Results: In 8 out of 23 cases, the PGT-A results were concordant with both the re-biopsy and the isolated TE and ICM analyses. The latter included the diagnoses of full non-mosaic aneuploidies (five cases of trisomies and two cases of monosomies). In one case, the results of PGT-A, aCGH on the TE re-biopsy, and FISH on the isolated TE showed Xp tetrasomy, which contrasted with the FISH results on the isolated ICM, where this chromosomal pathology was not detected. This case was classified as a confined mosaicism. In 4 out of 23 cases, the results were partially discordant. The latter included one case of trisomy 12, which was detected as non-mosaic by PGT-A and the re-biopsy and as mosaic by FISH on the isolated TE and ICM. This case was classified as a true mosaicism with a false negative PGT-A result. In 11 out of 23 cases, the re-examination results were not concordant with the PGT-A results. In one of these discordant cases, non-mosaic tetraploidy was detected by FISH in the isolated TE and ICM, whereas the PGT-A and the TE re-biopsy failed to detect any abnormality, which advocated for their false negative result. In two cases, the re-examination did not confirm full aneuploidies. In eight cases, full or partial mosaic aneuploidies as well as chaotic mosacism were not confirmed in the isolated TE nor the isolated ICM. Thus, in 47.8% of cases, the PGT-A results did not reflect the true chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. Conclusions: The PGT results may have different prognostic value in the characterization of the chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. The detected non-mosaic aneuploidies have the highest prognostic value. In stark contrast, most PGT-identified mosaic aneuploidies fail to characterize the true chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. Once detected, a differential diagnosis is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assisted Reproductive Technology: Clinical Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop