Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (757)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = translational immunotherapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
42 pages, 3921 KB  
Review
Lipid-Based Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Glycoproteins: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
by Hamad Alrbyawi
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(9), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18091045 - 22 Aug 2026
Abstract
Therapeutic glycoproteins, a pivotal class of biopharmaceuticals, have transformed modern medicine through their broad applications in oncology, immunotherapy, and infectious disease management. Their structural complexity and biological specificity make them highly effective in targeting disease pathways; however, challenges related to stability, bioavailability, and [...] Read more.
Therapeutic glycoproteins, a pivotal class of biopharmaceuticals, have transformed modern medicine through their broad applications in oncology, immunotherapy, and infectious disease management. Their structural complexity and biological specificity make them highly effective in targeting disease pathways; however, challenges related to stability, bioavailability, and delivery efficacy limit their full potential. Recent advancements in delivery technologies have sought to address these challenges through innovative approaches such as nanotechnology-based carriers, controlled-release systems, and molecular engineering. These strategies have demonstrated the ability to enhance glycoprotein stability, optimize pharmacokinetics, and achieve targeted delivery with minimal off-target effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art lipid-based delivery systems specifically designed to overcome the unique pharmaceutical challenges associated with therapeutic glycoproteins, highlighting their design principles, formulation strategies, mechanisms of encapsulation and release, and therapeutic advantages in improving glycoprotein stability, bioavailability, targeted delivery, and treatment efficacy. In addition to surveying the current landscape, this review delves into the key challenges impeding the widespread adoption of advanced delivery systems, including immunogenicity, manufacturing scalability, and clinical translation. The review concludes with insights into emerging trends in the development of lipid-based delivery systems, positioning glycoprotein therapeutics at the forefront of innovation in biopharmaceuticals. This overview of advancements and challenges aims to provide a roadmap for future progress in the field of glycoprotein delivery and therapeutic applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 3660 KB  
Review
Restoring Immune Tolerance in Rheumatic Disease
by Ola A. Al-Ewaidat and Moawiah M. Naffaa
Rheumato 2026, 6(3), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/rheumato6030019 - 21 Aug 2026
Viewed by 57
Abstract
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are still treated predominantly through broad or targeted suppression of inflammatory pathways, yet durable restoration of self-tolerance remains a central unmet therapeutic goal. This narrative review examines restoration of immune tolerance as an emerging translational framework in rheumatology, integrating checkpoint [...] Read more.
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are still treated predominantly through broad or targeted suppression of inflammatory pathways, yet durable restoration of self-tolerance remains a central unmet therapeutic goal. This narrative review examines restoration of immune tolerance as an emerging translational framework in rheumatology, integrating checkpoint agonism, antigen-specific immunotherapy, regulatory cell-based strategies, and immune-reset approaches within a unified therapeutic perspective. Rather than treating these strategies as isolated innovations, the review evaluates how each attempts to restore, reinforce, or reconfigure immune restraint at distinct biological levels, spanning inhibitory receptor signaling, antigen-selective non-responsiveness, dominant regulatory control, and deeper reconfiguration of pathogenic immune architecture. Their relevance is considered across rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s disease, and systemic sclerosis, with emphasis on mechanistic rationale, translational maturity, disease-specific therapeutic fit, biomarkers, therapeutic timing, and major barriers to clinical implementation. Collectively, these approaches suggest a shift in rheumatology from repeated control of inflammatory consequences toward more selective and potentially durable recalibration of autoreactive immunity. Although the field remains biologically and clinically immature, restoration of immune tolerance is emerging as an important organizing principle for the development of more precise and potentially disease-modifying therapies in autoimmune rheumatic disease. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 672 KB  
Review
The Evolution of FAP-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors: From Immunotherapy to Immunotheranostic Applications
by Hugo Boutier, Anja Feldmann and Michael Bachmann
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(16), 7425; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167425 - 19 Aug 2026
Viewed by 155
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of hematologic malignancies but has demonstrated limited efficacy in solid tumors, mainly due to the complex and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Among the strategies to overcome this challenge, targeting the tumor stroma [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of hematologic malignancies but has demonstrated limited efficacy in solid tumors, mainly due to the complex and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Among the strategies to overcome this challenge, targeting the tumor stroma rather than the tumor cells themselves has gained increasing interest. In this context, fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP), a cell surface protease overexpressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts, represents a promising target. With the aim of remodeling the TME, enhancing immune infiltration, and suppressing tumor growth, numerous FAP-directed CAR T-cell therapies have been developed in the last decade, leading to the clinical translation of two candidates. To improve the flexibility and safety profile of CAR T-cell therapies, several groups have designed more controllable and modular approaches, including adapter CAR T-cell systems, which enable on-demand activation of effector cells through the administration of an adapter molecule. In parallel, the development of FAP-targeted radiotracers, particularly FAP inhibitors (FAPIs), has enabled high-contrast imaging of solid tumors and introduced attractive opportunities for radioligand therapy. The convergence of these advances has given rise to immunotheranostic strategies that integrate CAR T-cell immunotherapy and radioligand delivery within a unified framework. This review traces the evolution of FAP-directed CAR T-cell strategies, from conventional designs to adapter-based and theranostic platforms, and examines how modular adapters bring immunotherapy and radioligand delivery together within a single immunotheranostic framework, across preclinical and clinical settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1313 KB  
Review
IDH-Mutant Diffuse Glioma: From Metabolic Origins to Targeted Therapy
by Tadeja Urbanic-Purkart
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(16), 6387; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166387 - 18 Aug 2026
Viewed by 132
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2-mutant diffuse gliomas represent a biologically distinct subgroup of adult brain tumors in which eary metabolic reprogramming and accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) drive epigenetic, immunologic, and clinical characteristics, including a high burden of glioma-associated epilepsy. This review summarizes [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2-mutant diffuse gliomas represent a biologically distinct subgroup of adult brain tumors in which eary metabolic reprogramming and accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) drive epigenetic, immunologic, and clinical characteristics, including a high burden of glioma-associated epilepsy. This review summarizes the molecular and metabolic consequences of IDH mutations, their role in glioma-associated epilepsy, and the evolving impact of mutant IDH-targeted therapies in contemporary neuro-oncology. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of key molecular, translational, imaging, and clinical studies on IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas. The literature included the 2021 (World Health Organization) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, studies investigating D-2HG biology and glioma-associated epilepsy, and prospective clinical trials and real-world evidence evaluating IDH-targeted therapies and contemporary antiseizure management. Particular emphasis was placed on vorasidenib, advanced metabolic imaging, and emerging liquid biopsy approaches. Results: IDH mutations are early driver events that promote D-2HG accumulation, resulting in widespread epigenetic reprogramming, metabolic dysregulation, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. D-2HG has also been implicated in the development of glioma-associated epilepsy, although the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Advances in integrated histomolecular diagnostics, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, amino acid positron emission tomography, and cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy have improved disease classification and treatment monitoring. Mutant IDH inhibitors, particularly vorasidenib, prolong progression-free survival, delay the need for subsequent treatment, and reduce intratumoral D-2HG concentrations, and have shown encouraging early signals of improved seizure control and preserved health-related quality of life in patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas, although this evidence remains preliminary and requires confirmation in larger prospective studies. Conclusions: IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas exemplify precision neuro-oncology, in which a single metabolic alteration informs diagnosis, disease monitoring, and targeted therapeutic approach. Additionally, ongoing studies are expected to further define the role of IDH inhibition across different disease stages and in combination with immunotherapy and standard treatments. Lastly, future clinical trials should systematically incorporate seizure outcomes, neurocognitive function, patient-reported outcomes, and immunologic endpoints to optimize both tumor control and quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Diagnostic Strategies for Glioma Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

52 pages, 19677 KB  
Review
Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers
by Marek Kos, Krzysztof Bojarski, Milena Czosnek, Jan Śnieżyński, Bartosz Wilczyński, Paulina Mertowska, Ewelina Grywalska and Sebastian Mertowski
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162675 - 18 Aug 2026
Viewed by 158
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, immunotherapy, and targeted treatment have moved clinical decision-making beyond a purely organ- and stage-based approach toward more individualized, biomarker-guided care. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging biological and targeted therapies used in esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal junction, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and biliary tract cancers. It focuses on immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4; HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates; antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies; and newer strategies involving CLDN18.2, FGFR2b, and tumor-agnostic alterations such as NTRK fusions. The review also considers the predictive biomarkers used to guide treatment selection and the growing integration of systemic therapy with surgery in neoadjuvant, perioperative, adjuvant, and conversion settings. However, clinical efficacy alone does not determine whether new treatments become part of routine practice. Regulatory approval, reimbursement, access to molecular testing, and the availability of specialized multidisciplinary care are equally important. The rapidly evolving treatment landscape for GI cancers therefore requires clinical decisions that account for tumor biology, anatomical resectability, molecular eligibility, expected benefit, treatment-related toxicity, and local access to therapy. Expanding access to comprehensive biomarker testing and effective molecularly guided treatments will be essential to translate progress in precision oncology into more personalized and equitable care for patients with GI cancers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 1381 KB  
Review
Nanoparticle Platforms in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Critical Comparative Review of PLGA, Mesoporous Silica, Magnetic Nanoparticles, and Covalent Organic Frameworks
by Sarfaraz K. Niazi
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18081019 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 325
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nanoparticle carriers can enhance cancer immunotherapy by improving tumor delivery, activating innate immune responses, and remodeling tumor microenvironments. This review evaluates four categories of formulations: poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), magnetic or iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs), and covalent [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Nanoparticle carriers can enhance cancer immunotherapy by improving tumor delivery, activating innate immune responses, and remodeling tumor microenvironments. This review evaluates four categories of formulations: poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), magnetic or iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs), and covalent organic frameworks (COFs). Methods: A reproducible PubMed audit identified 568 records. A rule-assisted title-and-abstract screen, followed by verification, removed 320 reviews, non-primary publications, and reports lacking qualifying in vivo formulation evidence. Of 248 potentially relevant reports, 15 primary studies were selected as representative examples; the remaining 233 were not classified as ineligible but were not selected as representative examples. These reports yielded 16 formulation-level records. One author conducted screening and extraction without protocol registration, duplicate review, or formal risk-of-bias scoring. Results: PLGA demonstrates the most robust polymer-level regulatory and manufacturing precedent; however, it remains limited by cargo instability, burst release, and challenges associated with process transfer. Biodegradable mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) facilitate pore-based protection and cytosolic delivery of cyclic dinucleotides, although their degradation and clearance are dependent on formulation specifics. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) integrate magnetic targeting, imaging, and hyperthermia capabilities but necessitate formulation-specific magnetic characterization, field dosimetry, and repeated-dose safety assessments. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) provide extensive stimulus-responsive and catalytic functionalities but exhibit the least mature evidence concerning biodegradation, scalable manufacturing, and independent reproducibility. Efficacy data across different studies were not pooled due to heterogeneity in models, schedules, comparators, and tumor-growth-inhibition formulas. Conclusions: The evidence does not endorse a universal platform ranking. Translation depends on standardized immune endpoints, explicit efficacy formulas, quantitative biodistribution assessments, mechanism-confirming experiments, repeat-dose toxicology studies, scalable manufacturing processes, and independent replication. The resulting evidence map serves as a descriptive and hypothesis-generating tool rather than a meta-analysis or clinical-priority scoring system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nanomedicine and Nanotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6746 KB  
Review
Revisiting the Abscopal Effect in the Era of Immuno-Radiotherapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Clinical Perspectives
by Enrico Rosa, Maria Vaccaro, Bruno Fionda, Valentina Lancellotta, Gabriele Ciasca, Pierpaolo Dragonetti, Lucia Di Maio, Fabio Marazzi, Francesco Marampon, Monica Mangoni, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Marco De Spirito and Luca Tagliaferri
Biomolecules 2026, 16(8), 1185; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16081185 - 14 Aug 2026
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Background: The abscopal effect refers to the clinical response of non-irradiated tumor lesions following localized radiotherapy (RT). Once regarded as a rare phenomenon, it has gained renewed interest in the era of immunotherapy, as RT may promote systemic anti-tumor immune responses. This narrative [...] Read more.
Background: The abscopal effect refers to the clinical response of non-irradiated tumor lesions following localized radiotherapy (RT). Once regarded as a rare phenomenon, it has gained renewed interest in the era of immunotherapy, as RT may promote systemic anti-tumor immune responses. This narrative review summarizes current biological, radiobiological, and clinical evidence on the abscopal effect and highlights translational gaps limiting its reproducibility. Methods: Preclinical, translational, and clinical evidence was qualitatively analyzed across seven domains: RT, immunology, and clinical oncology. A structured qualitative gap analysis was used to identify disconnections between biological mechanisms, RT parameters, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes. Results: Current evidence supports the biological plausibility of the abscopal effect through immunogenic cell death, antigen and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) release, activation of the cyclic GMP–AMP synthase–stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway, dendritic-cell priming, and T-cell-mediated responses. However, clinical results remain heterogeneous. Dose, fractionation, irradiated volume, timing, lymphocyte preservation, and interventional RT (modern brachytherapy, IRT) may influence systemic immune activation. Emerging biomarkers, particularly extracellular vesicles (EVs), may help connect radiation-induced biological stress with immune modulation and clinical response. Conclusions: The main barrier to clinical translation is the fragmentation of evidence across RT, immunology, and clinical oncology. Integrated translational frameworks combining dosimetry, immune monitoring, EVs-based biomarkers, imaging, and clinical endpoints may improve the interpretation and reproducibility of abscopal responses in immuno-RT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1581 KB  
Review
Chronotherapy in Oncology: Aligning Cancer Treatment with Biological Time
by Andrej Belančić, Marin Golčić, Almir Fajkić, Vlatka Bračić, Marko Skelin, Antonio Markotić, Ivan Ćavar, Dragan Trivanović and Ivana Mikolašević
J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16(8), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16080428 - 14 Aug 2026
Viewed by 282
Abstract
Circadian rhythms regulate key biological processes central to cancer biology, including cell cycle control, DNA repair, metabolism, immune function, and drug pharmacokinetics. Experimental models consistently demonstrate marked time-of-day differences in the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapies. Clinical studies of [...] Read more.
Circadian rhythms regulate key biological processes central to cancer biology, including cell cycle control, DNA repair, metabolism, immune function, and drug pharmacokinetics. Experimental models consistently demonstrate marked time-of-day differences in the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapies. Clinical studies of chronomodulated chemotherapy—particularly with fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, and anthracyclines—show reproducible reductions in treatment-related toxicity, while effects on survival outcomes remain variable and often sex dependent. Emerging clinical evidence also suggests that timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor administration may influence progression-free and overall survival across several tumor types. However, translation into routine oncology practice has been limited by interindividual variability in circadian phase, tumor-specific disruption of clock function, lack of validated biomarkers, and logistical constraints of time-specific drug delivery. Advances in circadian phenotyping, wearable monitoring, and adaptive dosing technologies now offer feasible pathways toward individualized, biology-driven treatment timing. This narrative review critically evaluates mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical evidence for chronotherapy across oncological treatment modalities and examines challenges and opportunities for its integration into precision cancer care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2820 KB  
Review
Rewiring the Molecular Interplay of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: From Cell Cycle Control to Immune Microenvironment Remodeling
by Yin Ku, Yao Zheng, Yu Ding, Peichuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Wu and Yaohui Chen
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(16), 7119; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167119 - 8 Aug 2026
Viewed by 234
Abstract
Traditional inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) have long been characterized as classical antiproliferative agents that induce G1 cell cycle arrest by blocking the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). However, recent studies in lung cancer have expanded this paradigm, revealing [...] Read more.
Traditional inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) have long been characterized as classical antiproliferative agents that induce G1 cell cycle arrest by blocking the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). However, recent studies in lung cancer have expanded this paradigm, revealing a functional transition from exclusive tumor suppression to the profound remodeling of the tumor microenvironment (TME) to enhance antitumor immunity. This review systematically outlines the genomic aberrations of the CDK4/6-Rb axis across lung cancer subtypes and dissects its immunomodulatory networks. These encompass the activation of effector T cells, the alleviation of immunosuppression mediated by regulatory T cells (Tregs), and the enhancement of antigen presentation via the Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway. Furthermore, we analyze acquired resistance mechanisms, primarily focusing on p21-CDK2 bypass activation mediated by Cyclin E1 gene (CCNE1) amplification and tumor protein 53 gene (TP53) mutations. We also review clinical investigations combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with targeted therapies against driver genes, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Notably, in the context of lung cancer, these combinatorial strategies have been primarily investigated in the second-line or subsequent settings following progression on standard platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Finally, we propose individualized, stratified treatment strategies based on genomic and immunological biomarkers, providing a translational framework for overcoming multidrug resistance and optimizing next-generation combinatorial regimens in lung cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 10439 KB  
Review
Gut Microbiome-Driven Strategies to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance in Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer
by Lidia Boldeanu, Alice Elena Ghenea, Alina Elena Ciobanu Plasiciuc, Mihail Virgil Boldeanu, Rodica Pădureanu, Mohamed-Zakaria Assani, Vlad Pădureanu, Isabela Siloși, Marius Bogdan Novac and Ancuța-Ramona Boicea Camen
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2538; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162538 - 7 Aug 2026
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) accounts for the vast majority of CRC cases and remains largely resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiome is an important regulator of antitumor immunity and may contribute to immunotherapy resistance through [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) accounts for the vast majority of CRC cases and remains largely resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiome is an important regulator of antitumor immunity and may contribute to immunotherapy resistance through multiple mechanisms involving the tumor microenvironment. This review aims to summarize current knowledge of the microbiome–immunity–therapy axis in MSS CRC and to explore microbiome-based strategies to enhance immunotherapy responsiveness. Methods: A narrative review of the recent literature was conducted, focusing on studies published within the last five years that investigated gut microbiota composition, microbial metabolites, tumor immune regulation, immunotherapy response, and microbiome-targeted therapeutic interventions in CRC. Evidence from mechanistic studies, translational research, clinical investigations, and multi-omics analyses was integrated. Results: Current evidence indicates that gut dysbiosis contributes to immune resistance in MSS CRC through immune exclusion, myeloid-driven immunosuppression, T-cell dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and altered microbial metabolite signaling. Specific microorganisms, including Fusobacterium nucleatum, enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, pks-positive Escherichia coli, and other CRC-associated pathobionts, have been implicated in tumor progression and modulation of antitumor immunity. Microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived compounds, bile acids, succinate, and inosine represent key functional mediators linking microbial communities to host immune responses. Emerging microbiome-targeted interventions, including fecal microbiota transplantation, next-generation probiotics, postbiotics, selective microbial depletion, and engineered bacterial therapeutics, have shown promising results in preclinical models and early translational or clinical studies, although robust clinical evidence remains limited. In parallel, advances in metagenomics, metabolomics, spatial transcriptomics, and artificial intelligence are facilitating the development of precision immuno-microbiome oncology approaches. Conclusions: The gut microbiome functions as a critical regulator of immune resistance in MSS CRC through coordinated effects on microbial composition, metabolite production, and tumor immune remodeling. Microbiome-targeted interventions, combined with multi-omics-based patient stratification, may provide new opportunities to overcome immunotherapy resistance and expand the clinical benefits of immune checkpoint blockade in this traditionally refractory disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacology, Microbiology and Immunology in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1690 KB  
Review
Pathological Pathways of Olfactory Neuroblastoma: From Molecular Mechanisms to Targeted Therapy: A Narrative Review
by Wenqiao Zhou, Xingchen Liu, Junying Hu, Yu Chen, Feng Liu and Bing Zhong
Cancers 2026, 18(15), 2510; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152510 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), also known as esthesioneuroblastoma, is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory epithelium of the sinonasal tract. Surgery combined with radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for localized disease, whereas chemotherapy is mainly used in advanced or recurrent cases. However, [...] Read more.
Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), also known as esthesioneuroblastoma, is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory epithelium of the sinonasal tract. Surgery combined with radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for localized disease, whereas chemotherapy is mainly used in advanced or recurrent cases. However, recurrent and metastatic ONB continues to present major therapeutic challenges, and traditional staging and histological grading systems cannot fully explain the marked differences in clinical behavior among patients. The primary objective of this review is to summarize recent advances in the molecular pathology, tumor microenvironment (TME), and emerging targeted therapeutic strategies in ONB. Emerging genomic and transcriptomic studies suggest that ONB comprises biologically heterogeneous tumors with distinct molecular and transcriptional programs associated with proliferation, neuroendocrine differentiation, angiogenesis, and stromal remodeling. Furthermore, we explore the increasing attention directed toward the TME, including immune-cell infiltration, angiogenic signaling, and immune checkpoint expression, which may influence therapeutic response. These molecular findings have generated interest in several potential targeted treatment strategies, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), anti-angiogenic therapy, epigenetic-targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and DNA-damage-response-targeted approaches. Ultimately, although the current evidence remains limited because of the rarity of the disease, novel therapeutic strategies for ONB are emerging. In addition to summarizing the current landscape, this review discusses the translational challenges and future directions for precision oncology and biomarker-driven therapy, aiming to provide insights for improving individualized patient management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Diagnosis to Therapy (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

48 pages, 1907 KB  
Review
Targeting β-Adrenergic Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of β-Blockers
by Zuzanna Rogacz, Wiktoria Weronika Pacuła, Wiktor Janas, Magda Markiewka, Paulina Wala, Marcel Madej and Barbara Strzałka-Mrozik
Cancers 2026, 18(15), 2507; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152507 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 495
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide despite substantial advances in surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The limited efficacy of current treatment strategies in advanced disease and the emergence of therapeutic resistance highlight the [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide despite substantial advances in surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The limited efficacy of current treatment strategies in advanced disease and the emergence of therapeutic resistance highlight the urgent need for novel adjunctive therapeutic approaches. Increasing evidence indicates that chronic stress and sustained activation of β-adrenergic signaling promote colorectal tumor initiation, progression, angiogenesis, metastatic dissemination, and immune evasion, thereby identifying this pathway as a potential therapeutic target. Drug repurposing has emerged as an attractive strategy for accelerating the development of new anticancer therapies by identifying novel applications for clinically approved drugs with well-established safety profiles. Among these, β-blockers have gained considerable attention because of their ability to inhibit β-adrenergic signaling and modulate multiple oncogenic pathways implicated in CRC progression. Although accumulating preclinical and observational clinical evidence suggests that β-blockers may possess anticancer potential, the underlying molecular mechanisms and their translational relevance have not yet been comprehensively integrated. This review provides a critical overview of the current evidence regarding the therapeutic potential of β-blockers in CRC by integrating findings from preclinical and clinical studies. Particular emphasis is placed on the regulation of key signaling pathways, including cAMP/PKA/CREB, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, as well as on the effects of β-blockers on tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment and antitumor immune responses. However, significant barriers limit the translation of these findings into routine clinical practice, including the limited representativeness of preclinical models, potential hemodynamic adverse effects, and the inherent limitations of observational studies. Importantly, owing to the lack of prospective randomized clinical trials, the current evidence remains insufficient to establish the clinical efficacy of β-blockers in CRC. Although β-blockers possess several characteristics that make them attractive candidates for drug repurposing, including a well-established safety profile, widespread availability, and low cost, further mechanistic studies, prospective randomized clinical trials, and biomarker-based patient stratification are essential to determine their clinical efficacy and define their role in personalized CRC therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection New Treatment for Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 1176 KB  
Review
Decoding the Complexity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Challenges and Targeting HuR as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy
by Elizabeth Jones, Natalie Eppler, Forkan Ahamed and Yuxia Zhang
Livers 2026, 6(4), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6040074 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 444
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and remains a major therapeutic challenge due to its marked inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, diverse etiologies, and high propensity for therapeutic resistance. This review summarizes the biological complexity of HCC [...] Read more.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and remains a major therapeutic challenge due to its marked inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, diverse etiologies, and high propensity for therapeutic resistance. This review summarizes the biological complexity of HCC and current therapeutic challenges, with a particular focus on the RNA-binding protein human antigen R (HuR) as an emerging therapeutic target. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, focusing on HCC pathogenesis, molecular heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment, mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, and recent advances in treatment. Emphasis was placed on studies investigating the biological functions of HuR and its therapeutic potential in HCC. Results: HCC progression is driven by complex interactions among genetic, epigenetic, metabolic, and environmental factors, resulting in substantial tumor heterogeneity and variable therapeutic responses. Dysregulated oncogenic signaling and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment collectively contribute to resistance against current therapies, including multikinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although emerging strategies, such as combination immunotherapy, metabolic targeting, epigenetic modulation, and precision medicine, have shown encouraging preclinical and clinical results, their efficacy remains limited by tumor complexity and adaptive resistance. HuR functions as a master post-transcriptional regulator that stabilizes and promotes the translation of numerous mRNAs encoding oncogenic, inflammatory, and pro-survival factors. Accumulating preclinical evidence demonstrates that pharmacological inhibition of HuR suppresses multiple tumor-promoting pathways and enhances therapeutic sensitivity, supporting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for HCC. Conclusions: The biological complexity of HCC necessitates multifaceted, precision-based therapeutic approaches. Although additional HCC-specific mechanistic and translational studies are needed, targeting HuR represents a promising strategy to overcome tumor heterogeneity, therapeutic resistance, and disease progression. Continued integration of molecular profiling, advanced omics technologies, and rational combination therapies will be essential for translating these advances into improved clinical outcomes for patients with HCC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

51 pages, 5440 KB  
Review
Targeting lncRNAs to Overcome Cancer Therapy Resistance: Advances in RNA Therapeutics and Delivery Strategies
by Christos Drosos, Athina Kapsi, Anthi Nikolaidou and Antonis Giakountis
Cancers 2026, 18(15), 2497; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152497 - 4 Aug 2026
Viewed by 929
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as important regulators of cancer biology. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, gain particular attention due to their cancer-specific expression patterns and functional roles in tumor progression, metastasis and therapeutic resistance. Although [...] Read more.
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as important regulators of cancer biology. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, gain particular attention due to their cancer-specific expression patterns and functional roles in tumor progression, metastasis and therapeutic resistance. Although lncRNAs have been extensively studied as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers, growing evidence indicates that they can also act as active mediators of therapeutic resistance, supporting their potential as therapeutic candidates. Here, we summarize how lncRNAs contribute to resistance against radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, highlighting their molecular mechanisms. Next, we discuss RNA-based therapeutics as a strategy to target disease-relevant transcripts, focusing on antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNA (miRNA) mimics and antimiRs, as well as approved RNA therapeutic agents, oncology-focused candidates in clinical development and emerging preclinical approaches directed against lncRNAs or lncRNA-controlled regulatory axes. Finally, we examine delivery platforms, including lipid-based nanovectors, extracellular vesicles, polymeric systems and other approaches designed to overcome key translational barriers, such as RNA instability, off-target effects, immune activation, renal clearance and inefficient tumor-specific delivery. By connecting lncRNA-mediated resistance mechanisms with RNA therapeutic strategies and delivery technologies, this review highlights lncRNA-directed RNA therapeutics as a promising yet developing approach in oncology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 13733 KB  
Review
Endobronchial Intratumoral Immuno- and Gene Therapies in Lung Cancer: Mechanisms of Local Delivery, Systemic Immune Effects, and Global Feasibility
by Mihai Olteanu, Gabriela Marina Andrei, Ramona Cioboată and Virginia Maria Rădulescu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(15), 6988; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27156988 - 4 Aug 2026
Viewed by 503
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and durable benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited by immune exclusion, microenvironmental immunosuppression, and toxicity. This narrative translational review evaluates whether endobronchial intratumoral delivery of immuno- and gene-based therapies can transform bronchoscopic [...] Read more.
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and durable benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited by immune exclusion, microenvironmental immunosuppression, and toxicity. This narrative translational review evaluates whether endobronchial intratumoral delivery of immuno- and gene-based therapies can transform bronchoscopic access into a therapeutic platform linking local tumour intervention with systemic antitumour immunity. We synthesise evidence on endobronchial ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy, together with local checkpoint blockade, cytokine and mRNA-lipid nanoparticle constructs, oncolytic virotherapy, dendritic-cell approaches, viral and non-viral gene transfer, and enzyme- or metabolite-based strategies. Current clinical evidence remains preliminary, consisting mainly of Phase I trials, small prospective cohorts, and case-based signals, with feasibility and safety observations but no completed randomised trial demonstrating efficacy against standard-of-care systemic therapy. The most plausible candidates are patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, bronchoscopically accessible lesions, inadequate response to systemic immunotherapy, and immune-excluded or locally immunosuppressed tumours. Biomarkers such as PD-L1, tumour mutational burden, CD8+ infiltration, tertiary lymphoid structures, radiomics, and circulating tumour DNA require validation. This review integrates delivery technology, immune mechanisms, statistical evidence appraisal, biomarker limitations, AI-guided planning, and global feasibility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop