Search Results (17)

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness worldwide. It is characterized by a spectrum of disease that spans mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) all the way to neovascular glaucoma and tractional retinal detachment secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Most eyes with DR remain asymptomatic unless vision-threatening complications, such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or PDR, develop. Current treatment options include laser photocoagulation and/or anti-VEGF intravitreal injections. Patients under treatment with anti-VEGF agents usually require constant monitoring and multiple injections to optimize outcomes. This treatment burden plays a key role in suboptimal adherence to treatment in many patients, compromising their outcomes. Gene therapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for DR. The mechanism for current trials evaluating gene therapies for DR consists of delivering transgenes to the retina that express anti-angiogenic proteins that inhibit VEGF. Preliminary results from the SPECTRA (4D-150) and ALTITUDE (ABBV-RGX-314) studies are promising, demonstrating an improvement in the diabetic retinopathy severity score and a reduction in the treatment burden. In contrast, the INFINITY (ADVM-022) trial was complicated by several cases of severe inflammation and hypotony that led the sponsor to discontinue further development of this product for DME. Full article

Background/Objectives: To compare the surgical outcomes of 25-gauge (G) vitrectomy to those of 27G vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with a tractional retinal detachment (TRD). Methods: Eighty-three consecutive eyes of 71 patients with PDR and TRD that underwent initial vitrectomy at the Kyorin Eye Center from June 2021 to August 2023 and were followed for ≥3 months were studied retrospectively. The surgical outcomes of the 10,000 cut/min (cpm) 25G vitrectomy (25G group, 25 eyes) to that of the 20,000 cpm 27G vitrectomy (27G group, 58 eyes) were compared. Results: The preoperative PDR status, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were assessed relative to the surgical success. The 25G group had significantly more eyes with severe PDR (p = 0.010), no prior laser photocoagulation (p = 0.027), macular detachment (p = 0.006), and the use of bimanual technique (p = 0.005). However, the operative times and incidence of iatrogenic breaks were not significantly different. The visual acuity improved significantly in both groups at 3 months postoperatively. The primary anatomical success was 88% in the 25G and 97% in the 27G groups (p > 0.05). The risk factors for a postoperative retinal detachment were significantly associated with the grade (p = 0.042) and type of PDR (p = 0.041), the use of perfluorocarbon liquid (p = 0.028), and bimanual techniques (p = 0.017). Conclusions: The high anatomical success for both groups for TRD secondary to PDR indicates that both can be used to treat eyes with PDR. The 27G vitrectomy may reduce the need for bimanual techniques. Full article

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes vision impairment and significant vision loss. Portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to enhance the accessibility and frequency of DME screening, facilitating early diagnosis and continuous monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a portable OCT device (ACT100) in assessing DME compared with a traditional stationary OCT device (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus). Methods: This prospective clinical investigation included 40 eyes of 33 patients with DME. Participants with significant refractive errors (myopia > −6.0 diopters or hyperopia > +3.0 diopters), vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, or other ocular diseases affecting imaging were excluded. Spectral-domain OCT was performed by a single examiner using both devices to capture macular volume scans under mydriasis. Central macular thickness (CMT) was evaluated using the analysis software for each device: Cirrus used version 6.0.4, and ACT100 used version V20. We analyzed inter-evaluator and inter-instrument agreements for qualitative assessments of the intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) using Cohen’s kappa coefficient, whereas quantitative CMT assessments were correlated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results: Substantial inter-evaluator agreement for IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) and ERM (κ = 0.688) with ACT100 and inter-instrument agreement (κ = 0.756 for IRF/SRF, κ = 0.684 for ERM) were observed. CMT values measured using ACT100 were on average 29.6 μm lower than that of Cirrus (285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm, p < 0.0001) but showed a strong correlation (R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: ACT100 portable OCT demonstrated high reliability for DME evaluations, comparable to that of stationary systems. Full article

Purpose: To evaluate prognostic factors for visual outcome in patients with diabetes who have undergone vitrectomy (PPV) for severe proliferative diabetic vitreoretinopathy (PDVR) in at least one eye in the past 15 years. Methods: Medical records of 132 eyes of 66 patients were analyzed (median age 52 years 21–80; patients with type 1/2 diabetes 40/26; median follow-up 38 months 9–125). Correlations between final favorable visual outcome defined as 0.5≤ best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and prognostic factors (age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, metabolic status, BCVA, diabetic retinopathy status, data of preoperative management, data of vitrectomy, and postoperative complications) were analyzed. Results: BCVA improved significantly in the entire study cohort (from median 0.05 min–max 0.001–1 to 0.32, 0.001–1, p < 0.001). Visual stabilization was achieved in the majority of patients, and good visual acuity (0.5 ≤ BCVA) was maintained in more than one-third of the eyes. Multivariable GEE statistics showed that in addition to the duration of diabetes and stable HbA1c values, only preoperative tractional macular detachment proved to be an independent significant predictor of visual outcome. Conclusions: Pars plana vitrectomy is a useful tool when performed early before tractional macular detachment. However, long-term visual stability can only be achieved with good metabolic control. Full article

Myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) affects 20% of eyes with pathologic myopia (PM). The MTM Staging System (MSS), published in 2020, describes the nomenclature of MTM as well as a proposal of pathogenesis, natural evolution, and prognosis. A study of customized treatment for each stage of MTM has been published previously and suggested to treat maculoschisis and detachment by placing a macular buckle (MB) behind the macula to push the sclera towards the retina, selecting pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) only in cases where a macular hole is associated with MTM. We hereby describe a new model of a macular buckle, known as NPB, and an NPB loading device, with the aim to standardize the surgical technique and render it more user friendly, efficient, and safe. Macular buckle is an effective and safe procedure to treat maculoschisis and macular detachment in MTM. We recommend using it as a unique and first-line treatment. Full article

Complications from diabetic retinopathy such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) constitute leading causes of preventable vision loss in working-age patients. Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a major role in the pathogenesis of these complications, VEGF inhibitors have been the cornerstone of their treatment. Anti-VEGF monotherapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for DME. However, due to the intensive and burdensome treatment, most patients in routine clinical practice are undertreated, and therefore, their outcomes are compromised. Even in adequately treated patients, persistent DME is reported anywhere from 30% to 60% depending on the drug used. PDR is currently treated by anti-VEGF, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or a combination of both. Similarly, a number of eyes, despite these treatments, continue to progress to tractional retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage. Clearly there are other molecular pathways other than VEGF involved in the pathogenesis of DME and PDR. One of these pathways is the angiopoietin–Tie signaling pathway. Angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) plays a major role in maintaining vascular quiescence and stability. It acts as a molecular brake against vascular destabilization and inflammation that is usually promoted by angiopoietin 2 (Ang2). Several pathological conditions including chronic hyperglycemia lead to Ang2 upregulation. Recent regulatory approval of the bi-specific antibody, faricimab, may improve long term outcomes in DME. It targets both the Ang/Tie and VEGF pathways. The YOSEMITE and RHINE were multicenter, double-masked, randomized non-inferiority phase 3 clinical trials that compared faricimab to aflibercept in eyes with center-involved DME. At 12 months of follow-up, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, improved anatomic outcomes and a potential for extended dosing when compared to aflibercept. The 2-year results of the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials demonstrated that the anatomic and functional results obtained at the 1 year follow-up were maintained. Short term outcomes of previously treated and treatment-naive eyes with DME that were treated with faricimab during routine clinical practice suggest a beneficial effect of faricimab over other agents. Targeting of Ang2 has been reported by several other means including VE-PTP inhibitors, integrin binding peptide and surrobodies. Full article

Peripapillary intrachoroidal cavitation (PICC) is a yellow-orange lesion, located at the outer border of the myopic conus. First described as a localized detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium, its intrachoroidal location was later revealed, justifying its current name. PICC is related to other myopic complications such as posterior staphyloma, but its pathogenesis is not clear to date. Although it has been considered a benign condition, most eyes with PICC show visual field defects, which leads to diagnostic uncertainty as these deficits resemble those seen in glaucoma. Furthermore, eyes with PICC may develop macular detachment with retinoschisis. Finally, misdiagnosis of PICC as a metastatic choroidal tumor may lead to unnecessary and anxiety-inducing investigations. Advances in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging have improved the visualization of ocular structures, contributing to the understanding of PICC. Recently, high optic nerve sheath traction forces during eye movements in highly myopic eyes have been suggested as promoters of PICC, renewing interest around this condition. However, a review of PICC is still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to provide a concise yet comprehensive overview of the current state of the art, focusing on OCT illustrations, pathophysiology and potential future perspectives based on the biomechanics of the optic nerve. Full article

Background: Currently, the gold standard of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment is anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, although a percentage of patients do not respond optimally. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a well-established treatment for DME cases with a tractional component while its role for nontractional cases is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling in nontractional refractory DME. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of twenty-eight eyes with nontractional refractory DME treated with vitrectomy at San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan, between 2016 and 2018. All surgeries were performed by a single experienced vitreoretinal surgeon. In 43.4% of cases, the ILM was peeled. Best corrected visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months post-vitrectomy. Results: The mean central macular thickness improved from 413.1 ± 84.4 to 291.3 ± 57.6 μm at two years (p < 0.0001). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved after two years, from 0.6 ± 0.2 to 0.2 ± 0.1 (p < 0.0001). We found no difference between ILM peeling vs. no ILM peeling group in terms of anatomical (p = 0.8) and visual outcome (p = 0.3). Eyes with DME and subfoveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) at baseline had better visual outcomes at the final visit (p = 0.001). Conclusions: We demonstrated anatomical and visual improvement of patients who underwent vitrectomy for nontractional refractory DME with and without ILM peeling. Improvement was greater in patients presenting subretinal fluid preoperatively. Full article

Background and Objectives: There are few data in the literature concerning the learning curve of tractional retinal detachment (TRD) surgery. We have analyzed the experience gained by a vitreoretinal surgeon over 10 years. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study of 34 TRD cases operated using 20G instruments between 2008 and 2011 (group A) and 94 cases operated using 23G instruments between 2015 and 2019 (group B). The preoperative characteristics, the type of endotamponade, and the anatomical and functional success were reviewed. Results: The group A patients had a significantly higher rate of concomitant vitreous hemorrhage (VH) at presentation (64.7% vs. 37.2%) and of non-macular retinal detachments (52.9% vs. 39.3%). The rate of silicone oil endotamponade was high in both groups (76.4% vs. 68.1%), but in group B 25.5% were left without a tamponade (vs. none in group A). A postoperative anatomical success was obtained in 76.5% of eyes in group A and 84.04% of eyes in group B (where it was improved to 89.3% by reinterventions). The presenting visual acuity (VA) was very low in both groups (0.01 and 0.05, respectively). The proportion of eyes with improved or stabilized VA was 85.3% in group A and 79.8% in group B (statistically non-significant difference). Conclusions: The anatomical success rate improves quite slowly with increasing surgeon experience and can be further improved by reinterventions. Visual improvement does not match the rate of anatomical improvement. With increasing experience and self-confidence, the surgeon will approach more difficult cases, a fact that may slow down the increase in surgical success rates. Full article

Vitreomacular interface plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) in PDR. The macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of 493 eyes from 378 PDR patients were retrospectively reviewed to detect VMID, including vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar hole–associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP), and macular hole (MH). The associations between VMID and baseline factors, intraretinal structure, and visual acuity were analyzed. The prevalence was 78.9% for ERM, 13.4% for VMT, 4.8% for MH, 2.2% for LHEP, and 2.0% for VMA, respectively. On multivariable analyses (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval), fibrovascular proliferation (FVP) was positively associated with MH (8.029, 1.873–34.420), VMT (3.774, 1.827–7.798), and ERM (2.305, 1.460–3.640). High-risk PDR was another risk factor of ERM (1.846, 1.101–3.090). Female gender was positively associated with MH (3.836, 1.132–13.006), while vitreous hemorrhage was negatively associated with MH (0.344, 0.133–0.890). Eyes with all VMID subtypes showed more frequent macular cysts and tractional retinal detachment with poorer visual acuity (p ≤ 0.001). Therefore, the prevalence of VMID was considerably high, indicating that this distinct entity should be considered in interventions for PDR. Full article

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of macular outward scleral height (MOSH) in different grades of myopic tractional maculopathy (MTM) and explore the risk factors for MTM. Methods: A total of 188 eyes (188 participants) with high myopia were divided into the no MTM (nMTM) group and the MTM group, which was further graded into foveoschisis, foveal detachment, full-thickness macular hole, and macular hole with retinal detachment. Swept-source optical coherence tomography was used to measure the MOSH. Results: No significant differences were found in axial length between the nMTM and MTM groups (p = 0.295). The MOSH was significantly higher in the MTM group (p < 0.001), which was identified as a risk factor for MTM (OR = 1.108, p < 0.001). The proportion of eyes with severe atrophic myopic maculopathy (AMM) was higher in the MTM group (28.48%) (p = 0.003). The macular hole with foveoschisis (MH/FS+) subgroup presented a higher average MOSH (p = 0.012) and more severe AMM (p = 0.009) than the macular hole without foveoschisis (MH/FS−) subgroup. Conclusion: MOSH would be more suitable for estimating MTM occurrence than axial length. The grading of AMM helps to evaluate the severity of MTM. The categorization of MH/FS− as a distinct grade from MH/FS+ might be preferable. Full article

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes and one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. Despite extensive efforts to reduce visual impairment, the prevalence of DR is still increasing. The initial pathophysiology of DR includes damage to vascular endothelial cells and loss of pericytes. Ensuing hypoxic responses trigger the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other pro-angiogenic factors. At present, the most effective treatment for DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) is the control of blood glucose levels. More advanced cases require laser, anti-VEGF therapy, steroid, and vitrectomy. Pan-retinal photocoagulation for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) is well established and has demonstrated promising outcomes for preventing the progressive stage of DR. Furthermore, the efficacy of laser therapies such as grid and subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation (SDM) for DME has been reported. Vitrectomy has been performed for vitreous hemorrhage and tractional retinal detachment for patients with PDR. In addition, anti-VEGF treatment has been widely used for DME, and recently its potential to prevent the progression of PDR has been remarked. Even with these treatments, many patients with DR lose their vision and suffer from potential side effects. Thus, we need alternative treatments to address these limitations. In recent years, the relationship between DR, lipid metabolism, and inflammation has been featured. Research in diabetic animal models points to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activation in cellular metabolism and inflammation by oral fenofibrate and/or pemafibrate as a promising target for DR. In this paper, we review the status of existing therapies, summarize PPARα activation therapies for DR, and discuss their potentials as promising DR treatments. Full article

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in the working-age population. The purpose of this review is to gather the existing literature regarding the use of the approved anti-vascular endothelial growth (anti-VEGF) agents in the treatment of DR. Methods: A comprehensive literature review in PubMed engine search was performed for articles written in English language up to 1 July 2021, using the keywords “diabetic retinopathy”, “ranibizumab”, “aflibercept”, and “anti-VEGF”. Emphasis was given on pivotal trials and recent robust studies. Results: Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents have been found to significantly improve visual acuity and reduce retinal thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a long-term follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years and are considered the standard-of-care in such patients. Regarding DR, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents provided ≥2-step improvement in DR severity on color fundus photography in about 30–35% of patients with NPDR at baseline, in the majority of clinical trials originally designed to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in patients with DME. Protocol S and CLARITY study have firstly reported that intravitreal anti-VEGF agents are non-inferior to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with proliferative DR (PDR). However, the use of new imaging modalities, such as optical coherence tomography-angiography and wide-field fluorescein angiography, reveals conflicting results about the impact of anti-VEGF agents on the regression of retinal non-perfusion in patients with DR. Furthermore, one should consider the high “loss to follow-up” rate and its devastating consequences especially in patients with PDR, when deciding to treat the latter with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents alone compared to PRP. In patients with PDR, combination of treatment of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and PRP has been also supported. Moreover, in the specific case of vitreous hemorrhage or tractional retinal detachment as complications of PDR, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents have been found to be beneficial as an adjunct to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), most commonly given 3–7 days before PPV, offering reduction in the recurrence of vitreous hemorrhage. Conclusions: There is no general consensus regarding the use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in patients with DR. Although anti-VEGF agents are the gold standard in the treatment of DME and seem to improve DR severity, challenges in their use exist and should be taken into account in the decision of treatment, based on an individualized approach. Full article

This study aimed to investigate the association of add-on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) therapy and the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we examined Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes, preexisting DR, and aged ≥40 years from 2009 to 2013. Prescription of DPP4i was defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥80% during the first 6 months. The outcomes included vitreous hemorrhage (VH), tractional retinal detachment, macular edema, and interventions including retinal laser therapy, intravitreal injection (IVI), and vitrectomy. Of 1,767,640 patients, 62,824 were eligible for analysis. After matching, the DPP4i and non-DPP4i groups each contained 20,444 patients. The risks of VH (p = 0.013) and macular edema (p = 0.035) were higher in the DPP4i group. The DPP4i group also had higher risks of receiving surgical interventions (retinal laser therapy (p < 0.001), IVI (p = 0.049), vitrectomy (p < 0.001), and any surgical intervention (p < 0.001)). More patients in the DPP4i group received retinal laser therapy (p < 0.001) and IVI (p = 0.001) than in the non-DPP4i group. No between-group differences in cardiovascular outcomes were noted. In the real-world database study, add-on DPP4i therapy may be associated with the progression of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes. No additional cardiovascular risks were found. The early progression of DR in rapid glycemic control was inconclusive in our study. The possible effect of add-on DPP4i therapy in the progression of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes requires further research. Full article

Tractional retinal detachment (TRD) causes visual loss in diabetes mellitus patients. Silicone oil can be used as a tamponade to repair retinal detachment; however, intrasilicone injection is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the effect of intrasilicone bevacizumab injection in TRD surgery. This was a single-hospital, retrospective, case-control study of 44 patients (46 eyes). We reviewed medical histories and ophthalmic examination results. We administered silicone oil to 26 eyes (group I), and a combination of silicone oil and intravitreal bevacizumab injection to 20 eyes (group II). The main outcome measures were the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and central macular thickness. Mean change in logMAR visual acuity was larger (p = 0.029) in group II (−0.99 ± 0.73) than in group I (−0.56 ± 0.80), 12 months postoperatively. Compared to group I, group II exhibited a lower mean (471.54 ± 120.14 μm vs. 363.40 ± 59.57 µm, respectively; p = 0.001), and mean change (−22.39 ± 203.99 μm vs. −72.40 ± 139.35 µm, respectively; p = 0.027), in central macular thickness, 1 month postoperatively. Intrasilicone bevacizumab injection immediately after vitrectomy may rapidly reduce central macular thickness and increase final visual acuity. Prospective studies are necessary to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy. Full article