Search Results (16)

Background: This study investigated syndesmotic stability after transection and the effects of stabilization using rigid and dynamic reconstruction techniques. Methods: Syndesmotic stability was analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic arm on 14 human specimens. Stability was analyzed in the neutral position and during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion using an external rotation stress test under an axial load of 200 Newtons. The examination was performed on intact and sequentially transected syndesmosis in the following order: (1) anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL); (2) interosseous ligament (IOL); and (3) posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). Then, reconstruction was performed using different syndesmotic screw techniques or a dynamic Suture Button system (Arthrex TightRope; n = 7). Results: A syndesmotic transection mainly caused sagittal instability of the fibula. While both static and dynamic reconstruction provided stabilization, screw fixation, particularly with two screws and a plate, demonstrated superior control of the fibular movement, especially in the sagittal and transverse planes, compared to one Suture Button. Conclusions: The results suggest that syndesmotic stabilization with one Suture Button may be insufficient for cases involving three-ligamentous injuries, whereas two Suture Buttons may offer comparable biomechanical stability to syndesmotic screws. Additionally, the study suggests that lateral radiographs may provide additional clinical value in assessing syndesmotic stability. Full article

Background: Syndesmotic fixation is a standard treatment for tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, especially in ankle fractures, but the necessity of routine screw removal remains debated. This study evaluates the impact of routine removal on functional outcomes, complication rates, and recovery, aiming to clarify its clinical relevance. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 330 patients treated surgically for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries at a single institution from 2016 to 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups: no removal, routine removal, and removal for clinical indications. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Olerud–Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and complications, including infections and prolonged pain, were recorded. Statistical analyses evaluated differences between groups. Results: Of the 170 patients who completed follow-up, no significant differences in OMASs were found between the groups (p = 0.646). Complications were more frequent in reoperated patients (9% vs. 2% for non-reoperated), but routine removal did not improve functional outcomes. Younger patients showed better OMASs, highlighting age as a key factor in recovery. Fixation and fracture types had no significant impact on outcomes. Conclusions: Routine syndesmosis screw removal offers no significant functional benefits, as demonstrated by comparable OMASs across groups (median OMAS: 85 for non-reoperated, 80 for routinely reoperated, and 80 for indication-based reoperated patients). However, routine removal is associated with a higher complication rate. A selective approach focusing on clinical indications is recommended to minimize unnecessary surgeries and optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on redefining evidence-based management strategies for syndesmotic fixation. Full article

Background/Objectives: Acute ankle sprains are common injuries that significantly affect both sports and daily activities. Syndesmotic injuries, a specific type of ligamentous damage, can occur as a part of a sprain or alongside fractures, affecting approximately 20% of ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate negative prognostic factors influencing surgical outcomes in tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries associated with ankle fractures. Methods: Data from 246 patients were analyzed to examine the impact of initial ankle dislocation, fracture type, and fixation method on postoperative complications and reoperation rates. Ankle joint fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using an anatomically contoured plate designed for optimal tibia and fibula fixation. Four methods of syndesmosis fixation were recorded: one three-cortical screw, one four-cortical screw, two screws (either both four-cortex screws or one three-cortex and one four-cortex screw), or one endobutton. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: Key findings reveal no significant association between initial dislocation and the necessity for reoperation (p = 0.613). However, smoking combined with dislocation significantly increases reoperation rates (35% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.026). Fixation type influenced outcomes, with single four-cortex screws linked to pain but fewer infections. Infection was the most common complication (33.3%), predominantly after fixation with a single three-cortex screw. Men had higher rates of fixation destabilization and infections, while women experienced pain persisting beyond six months postoperatively Conclusions: Patient-specific factors influence syndesmotic injury outcomes. Smoking, gender, and fixation type impact complications, emphasizing the need for tailored surgical approaches to enhance recovery and minimize reoperation risks. Future research should aim to corroborate these findings in larger, multicentric cohorts to refine surgical strategies for syndesmotic injury management. Full article

Objective: To review imaging findings of isolated tibiofibular interosseous membrane (IOM) injury and propose an injury mechanism. Case Report: A retrospective review was conducted on five patients who presented with lower leg pain following a traumatic athletic injury. MRI examinations revealed isolated tibiofibular IOM injury without associated fractures or distal syndesmotic disruption. The observed injury patterns, along with the blunt, non-rotational trauma reported in each case, suggest that the mechanism behind this unique presentation may involve sudden traction or direct impact to the lower leg. Conclusion: Isolated tibiofibular IOM injury should be considered in patients with lower leg pain after blunt trauma. MRI of the entire tibia and fibula can be instrumental in characterizing and confirming the injury and should be considered when clinical and injury mechanism indicators are present. Full article

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review is to examine the recent evidence comparing the removal and non-removal of syndesmotic screws in tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries in terms of functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify clinical studies on syndesmotic screw removal and its outcomes, searching the Cochrane Library and PubMed Medline for publications from 1 January 2004 to 12 February 2024. Studies were included if they involved tibiofibular syndesmotic screw fixation, assessed screw removal or retention, described clinical outcomes, and were original research with at least fifteen patients per group. Results: Most reviewed articles (18 out of 27; 67%) found no significant differences between the routine removal and retention of syndesmotic screws post-fixation. Four retrospective studies (15%) suggested that retaining screws might result in worse outcomes compared to removal. Two studies (7%) indicated that removing screws could introduce additional risks. One study (4%) observed that post-removal, there is some fibula–tibia separation without affecting the medial clear space. Another study (4%) noted that intraosseous screw breakage might increase the need for implant removal due to pain. Additionally, no significant differences in ankle function were found among groups with varying intervals of screw removal. Conclusions: The current literature does not definitively support routine removal of syndesmotic screws. Given the potential complications and financial costs, routine removal should not be performed unless specifically indicated. Full article

Background and Objectives: While numerous studies have been conducted on syndesmotic screw management following distal tibiofibular diastasis repair, a clear consensus remains unclear. This research aims to evaluate whether the postoperative removal of syndesmotic screws leads to improved patient outcomes, specifically in quality of life, mobility, and daily living activities, and whether it offers a cost-effective solution. Materials and Methods: Patients with a history of unimalleolar or bimalleolar ankle fractures, classified according to the Danis–Weber and Lauge–Hansen systems, were included. Comprehensive evaluations were made via standardized questionnaires like the SF-36 Health Survey, HADS, and WHOQOL-BREF, distributed approximately 2 months post surgery. A total of 93 patients underwent syndesmotic screw removal while 51 retained the screws (conservative approach). Results: Patients who underwent screw removal reported superior satisfaction in mobility, with a score of 7.8, compared to 6.7 in the conservative approach (p = 0.018). Similarly, their ability to perform daily activities scored 8.1, higher than the 6.5 from the conservative cohort (p < 0.001). Pain levels were also more favorable in the screw removal group, with a score of 5.3 against 6.8 in the conservative group (p = 0.003). On the SF-36 physical domain, the screw removal group achieved a mean score of 55.9 versus 53.3 for the conservative group (p = 0.027). Notably, the HADS anxiety subscale highlighted reduced anxiety levels in the screw removal cohort with a mean score of 5.8 against 7.3 in the conservative group (p = 0.006). However, overall quality of life and recommendations to others showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: Syndesmotic screw removal postoperatively leads to marked improvements in patients’ mobility, daily activity abilities, and reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels. However, overall quality of life was similar between the two approaches. The findings offer valuable insights for orthopedic decision making and patient-centered care concerning the management of syndesmotic screws after distal tibiofibular diastasis repair. Full article

Ankle syndesmosis is crucial to the integrity of the ankle joint and weight-bearing; an injury to this structure can lead to significant disability. The treatment methods for distal syndesmosis injuries are controversial. The representative treatment methods include transsyndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button fixation, and good results with suture tape augmentation have recently been reported. However, an augmentation using suture tape is only possible when the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) is intact. This study describes the case of an unstable syndesmosis injury, accompanied by anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and PITFL injuries, which were treated successfully using suture tape. A 39-year-old male patient sustained right ankle damage while skateboarding. His leg and ankle radiographs revealed a widening of the medial clear space, a posterior malleolus fracture, a reduced “syndesmosis overlap” compared with the contralateral side, and a proximal fibula fracture. The magnetic resonance imaging revealed ruptured deltoid ligaments, accompanied by AITFL, PITFL, and interosseous ligament injuries. A diagnosis of a Maisonneuve fracture with an unstable syndesmotic injury was made. The patient underwent an open syndesmotic joint reduction, along with an AITFL and PITFL augmentation. This anatomical reduction was confirmed using intraoperative arthroscopy and postoperative computed tomography (CT). An axial CT that was performed at the 6-month follow-up exam revealed a similar alignment of the syndesmosis between the injured and uninjured sides. There were no surgical complications and the patient did not complain of discomfort in his daily life. At the 12-month follow-up exam, a good clinical outcome was confirmed. As a treatment for unstable syndesmosis injury, ligament augmentation using suture tape shows satisfactory clinical outcomes and can be considered as a useful and reliable method for anatomical restoration and rapid rehabilitation. Full article

Background: Injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTFS) is common in patients with trauma to the ankle, but diagnostic accuracy of conventional X-ray and CT is insufficient. A novel dual energy CT (DECT) post-processing algorithm enables color-coded mapping of collagenous structures, which can be utilized to assess the integrity of the DTFS. Methods: Patients were included in this retrospective study if they underwent third-generation dual-source DECT followed by 3T-MRI or ankle joint surgery within 14 days between January 2016 and December 2021. Three radiologists blinded to all patient data independently evaluated grayscale images and, after 8 weeks, grayscale and collagen mapping images for the presence of ligamentous injury or avulsion fractures of the DTFS. MRI and surgery provided the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for all ratings, and a comparison of ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of color-coded images over grayscale images. Results: A total of 49 patients (median age 49 years; 32 males) were evaluated. Application of collagen mapping significantly increased sensitivity (25/30 [83%] vs. 20/30 [67%]), specificity (110/118 [93%] vs. 70/118 [60%]), positive predictive value (25/33 [76%] vs. 20/67 [30%]), negative predictive value (110/115 [96%] vs. 70/80 [88%]), and accuracy (134/147 [91%] vs. 90/147 [61%]) for the detection of injury to the DTFS (all parameters, p < 0.001). Collagen mapping achieved higher diagnostic confidence, image quality, and noise scores compared to grayscale CT (all parameters, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Collagen mapping yields substantially higher diagnostic accuracy and confidence for assessing the integrity of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis compared to grayscale CT in patients with acute trauma. The application of this algorithm can accelerate the adequate diagnosis and treatment of DTFS injury in clinical routine. Full article

There is still no general agreement about the most effective form of syndesmosis fixation with syndesmotic screws for patients affected by ankle fractures that are accompanied by syndesmotic injuries. In the same manner, no consensus has been reached yet on whether or not the tibiofibular syndesmotic screw is more beneficial if removed or not, as well as the exact timing of removal if this proves superiority. The purpose of this research was to verify whether or not removing syndesmotic screws reduces the risk of developing a diastasis and compare outcomes in patients whose syndesmotic screw was or was not removed at all. A retrospective observational study was carried out to cover a period of five years and a computed sample size of almost 300 cases. Patients were included in the current study if their history was positive for ankle fracture with distal tibiofibular diastasis repair with syndesmotic screws. Loss of reduction was more frequent after screw removal (8.5% vs. 2.1%), although the quality of reduction was generally excellent in both groups. The mean AOFAS score was significantly better in patients who had their tibiofibular screw removed (92.6 vs. 88.4), but the tibiofibular clear space and incisura fibularis depth widened more following the second intervention (3.8 mm vs. 3.6 mm, and, respectively, 4.3 vs. 4.1). Lastly, the same patients with tibiofibular screw removal had a significantly higher cost of total interventions and more days of medical leave (21 vs. 15 days on average). It seems that a strong conclusion in favor of removing or not removing syndesmotic screws after distal tibiofibular diastasis repair cannot be given. However, several radiographic findings lean toward the benefit of those patients whose tibiofibular screws were not removed, although mobility was notably better after the screw was removed. Furthermore, treatment expenses are greatly lowered if a subsequent operation for screw removal is avoided, as well as if individuals who have a single surgery take a shorter medical leave. Full article

Introduction: There is no consensus among orthopedic surgeons on the number of cortical layers (tricortical or quadricortical fixation) involved or the duration of syndesmotic fixation after a tibiofibular syndesmosis (TFSD)-injury treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess radiographic parameters following the treatment of TFSD injuries, with various time-windows of syndesmotic screw removal and numbers of cortical layers involved. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five patients, aged from 25 to 75 years, were included in the study. The follow-up period ranged from 2 years to 4 years and 2 months. The patients were subdivided into groups based on the duration of the syndesmotic fixation (8–15 weeks—19 patients or 16–22 weeks—36 patients) and the number of cortices involved (tricortical—17 patients or quadricortical fixation—38 patients). Results: The quadricortical fixation group showed a significant development of ankle joint arthritis and subtalar joint arthritis at the final follow-up. The mean medial clear space was 2.84 mm in the tricortical fixation group and 3.5 mm in the quadricortical fixation group (p = 0.005). Both groups, with different screw removal times showed significant development of posttraumatic arthritis. A comparison of the two groups (with different time-windows of the screw removal) revealed a significant difference only in terms of the postoperative tibiofibular (TF) overlap and the observed rates of talonavicular arthritis at the final follow-up. Discussion: We found that the duration of the screw fixation had no effect on most of the evaluated radiographic parameters. Only the postoperative TF overlap was lower in the 8–15-week fixation group, and the proportion of patients with talonavicular joint arthritis at the final follow-up was higher in the 16–22-week fixation group. In addition, the number of cortices involved in the screw fixation had no effect on the radiographic outcomes in our patients, apart from the differences in one parameter—the medial clear space—at the final follow-up. Conclusion: We achieved similar radiographic results irrespective of the duration of the screw fixation and the number of cortices involved. All study subgroups showed the development of adjacent-joint arthritis following treatment. Considering the results of our study, the economic and medical aspects of treatment, and the possibility of a faster recovery, the most optimal solution seems to be the use of a tricortical fixation, with the screws being removed after 8–15 weeks. Full article

Background: Suture button devices for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries provide semirigid dynamic stabilization. The effect of stabilization procedures on sports discipline and performance level in non-elite athletes after acute syndesmotic injury has not been clarified in sports medicine research to date. Methods: A total of 47 of 56 eligible patients were analyzed and completed the 1-year follow-up. The average age was 35.5 years (range, 18–60 years). The screw fixation and knotless suture button groups comprised 26 and 21 patients, respectively. Nine patients were lost to follow-up. Patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations preoperatively and twice during the 1-year postoperative follow-up. Function was measured using the FADI sports scale, the FAAM sports module, and a visual analogue scale for pain and function in sports. Questionnaires were completed to assess preoperative and postoperative sports levels and to evaluate the sports discipline. Results: All scores increased during the follow-up, but no significant differences were found in the FADI score, the FAAM sports module score and or the VAS score for pain and function during sport (p ≤ 0.05). Using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, we found no significant correlation between the groups for age, injury mechanism, or body mass index. Differences were identified in sports discipline and performance level between the groups during the follow-up period. Conclusion: No statistically significant differences could be demonstrated between the two stabilization methods in terms of return to previous sport level and return to the original sport discipline, so both procedures can be regarded as equivalent at present. Full article

The issue of choosing the method for optimal surgical treatment of a broken fibula has been debatable for many years. At the same time, concomitant repair of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries does not have a unified approach. It has been determined that osteosynthesis of broken shin bones with syndesmosis injury should combine stable fixation of the broken bone and should not limit the elastic properties of the syndesmosis. In case of a broken fibula, it is recommended to use a stable extracortical fixator and an elastic connection of the syndesmosis injury using a tightrope. An analytical model of the broken fibula, which is blocked with an extracortical fixator metal plate and elastically fixed with a tightrope, has been developed. The research object is the stress–strain state of the “broken fibula–extracortical titanium plate” composition under the action of tightrope tightening fixation. The main research result is an analytical dependence, which makes it possible to determine the permissible value of the tightrope tightening force for elastic fixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The research results have been tested numerically, and the influence of the parameters of plate, bone and damage localization on the permissible value of the tightrope tightening force has been analyzed. By using the rational tightrope tightening force with stable–elastic fixation of the broken shin, it is possible to reduce the time before the start of loading on the injured extremity and accelerate the functional recovery of the patient. Full article

Background and Objectives: In patients with ankle fractures complicated by syndesmotic injuries, no consensus has been reached on the best method of syndesmosis fixation using syndesmotic screws. One previous study revealed no difference in the tibiofibular overlap between two groups with or without syndesmotic screw removal. Other studies have indicated that distal tibiofibular diastasis exists after the removal of syndesmotic screws. In this study, we aimed to confirm the effect of syndesmotic screw removal on diastasis occurrence. We further analyzed the risk factors that may contribute to the widening of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved a review of the records of 63 patients with ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmosis injuries that required syndesmotic screw fixation. Anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed for each patient at various time points, from syndesmotic screw fixation to outpatient department follow-ups after screw removal. The changes in tibia–fibula overlap (OL), tibia–fibula clear space (CS), and medial clear space (MCS) were analyzed. Further analysis was performed to reveal potential factors that may have contributed to radiographic differences. Results: Compared with the postoperation radiographs following syndesmotic screw fixation, OL decreased (2.0 mm) and CS increased (0.8 mm) in the anteroposterior radiographs from outpatient department follow-ups. No significant changes were noted in OL or CS after syndesmotic screw removal. However, OL decreased (1.8 mm) and CS increased (0.5 mm) before syndesmotic screw removal. No significant change in MCS occurred during the whole observation period. Linear regression analysis did not reveal any significant correlations between potentially related factors and radiographic changes. Conclusions: Marked diastasis had occurred at final follow-up. Notably, the diastasis occurred before rather than after screw removal. This implies that screw removal does not significantly influence the radiographic outcomes of rotational ankle fractures. Full article

Background: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries. Full article

The suture button (SB) device was introduced to negate the need for routine hardware removal in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries. However, a considerable SB removal rate has been reported, and the impact of removal is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes after removal of SB for syndesmosis fixation. A total of 36 patients who underwent removal surgery after syndesmosis fixation using SB were identified. The mean postoperative time to removal was 12.2 months. On a plain radiograph, tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) was measured and compared at three follow-up time points. In patients with computed tomography (CT) imaging (n = 18), the anterior-to-posterior (A/P) ratio was measured to evaluate changes in quality of reduction. Additionally, clinical outcomes were assessed. There were no significant differences in TFCS between the three follow-up periods. None of the patients exhibited recurrent diastasis after SB removal. Although CT analysis demonstrated malreduction in six patients (33.3%), five of six patients had a subsequent spontaneous reduction of the syndesmosis. Clinically, all patients described the resolution of symptoms related to painful hardware at the final follow-up. Our results demonstrate that SB removal at one year following syndesmosis fixation leads to improved clinical symptoms without negatively impacting the quality of syndesmosis reduction. Full article