Search Results (191)

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare nerve-sparing (NS) and non-nerve-sparing (NNS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) techniques used to treat localized prostate cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated the impact of NS techniques on patient-reported outcomes. However, there are unaddressed methodological issues making interpretation of results difficult. Therefore, we performed a comparison of the two techniques, accounting for methodological threats, including patient selection and confounding. Methods: We sampled 120 patients with similar disease burden who underwent RARP by the same surgeon, either with NS (n = 84) or NNS (n = 36) and assessed changes in lower urinary tract (LUT) function and bother, and bowel function/bother using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire and the six-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) survey at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for differences in age, preoperative PSA levels, pathological tumor stage and Gleason-score of patients receiving either NS or NNS. Results: At 6 weeks postoperatively, the NNS group had a significantly larger decrease in LUT function compared to the NS group (−17.42; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −31.31, −3.53; p = 0.0145). At 12 months, both groups recovered substantially, and no group differences were observed (p > 0.9). No significant differences were observed between the NS and NNS groups for the EPIC bowel subscores, whereas the IIEF-6 showed borderline significance at 12 months. Conclusions: The results suggest a small impact of NS vs. NNS RARP on important patient-reported outcomes when controlling for tumor biology, surgeon skill, and patient characteristics. These results need to be confirmed by larger studies using similar sampling strategies and design considerations. Full article

Background and Objectives: Surgical stress during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) elicits a measurable systemic inflammatory response despite the minimally invasive approach. Intravenous lidocaine has been increasingly investigated for its potential anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and immunomodulatory benefits, but evidence in robotic urologic oncology remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion attenuates postoperative inflammation, improves analgesic outcomes, and accelerates early recovery following RARP. Materials and Methods: This prospective non-randomized observational study included 80 patients undergoing elective RARP, divided into a Lidocaine Group (n = 40) receiving an intraoperative bolus and continuous infusion, and a Control Group (n = 40) receiving standard anesthesia without lidocaine. Serum IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, and fibrinogen were measured at baseline, end of surgery, and 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, gastrointestinal recovery, ambulation, and length of stay were recorded. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA, correlation testing, and between-group comparisons. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At 24 h postoperatively, lidocaine administration was associated with a significantly attenuated inflammatory response, with lower levels of IL-6 (45.7 ± 10.8 vs. 68.9 ± 12.6 pg/mL, p < 0.01) and TNF-α (20.5 ± 5.1 vs. 27.2 ± 6.4 pg/mL, p < 0.01) compared with controls. Patients receiving lidocaine reported lower postoperative pain scores and required significantly less opioid analgesia, with a total 24 h consumption of 8.9 ± 3.4 vs. 14.8 ± 5.2 mg morphine milligram equivalents (p < 0.001). Lidocaine was also associated with faster recovery, including earlier oral intake and a shorter length of hospital stay (2.9 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.003). No lidocaine-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: In this prospective observational study, intraoperative intravenous lidocaine was associated with attenuated early postoperative inflammation, improved analgesic outcomes, and enhanced early recovery following RARP. These findings support the potential role of intravenous lidocaine as a safe adjunct in multimodal perioperative management; however, given the non-randomized observational design, causal inferences should be interpreted with caution. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm causality and to validate long-term clinical and mechanistic effects. Potential residual confounding inherent to the observational design should be considered when interpreting these findings. Full article

Background: Local recurrences following radical prostatectomy (RP) are typically attributed to incomplete surgical resection or positive surgical margins (PSMs). Yet approximately 70% of men with PSMs never experience BCR. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET scans (PSMA PET) are useful in detecting the incidence and location of recurrence sites. This study explores the relationship between margin status and local and metastatic recurrences using PSMA PET scans. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with prospectively collected data following RARP with BCR in 159 men undergoing PSMA PET (2017–2023). The primary outcome compared risk and location of recurrences between NSM vs. PSM. A total of 13 cases (8%) had “equivocal” PET scan findings which were assessed first as all positive and then all negative. Results: Of 159 men with BCR undergoing PSMA PET scans, 101 (63.5%) had NSMs and 58 (36.5%) had PSMs. Assuming all 13 “equivocal” scans were positive, the risk of a positive PSMA PET is NSMs vs. PSMs (73% vs. 69% p = 0.56). Local recurrence rates did not differ significantly (NSMs 39.2% vs. PSMs 45% p = 0.55), nor did lymph nodes (NSMs 61% vs. PSMs 58% p = 0.73) or bone lesions (NSMs 16.2% vs. PSMs 22.5% p = 0.41). Multivariate regression analysis showed that margin status was not a predictor of local recurrence (OR 1.40; 95% CI [0.65, 1.54]; p = 0.382). Conclusions: Local recurrence occurs at about the same rate independent of margin positivity status, suggesting that local recurrences appear to be more closely related to metastatic dissemination, not incomplete resection. These findings question the oncologic rationale for wider resections at the expense of functional outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Functional continence and potency outcomes are paramount for the pentafecta of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). We describe a modified approach of the pubovesical complex (PVC)-sparing technique under hypothermia for better continence and potency preservation. Methods: This is a retrospective single-institution case series. Thirty-three PVC-sparing RARP procedures under hypothermia were performed in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer by the same experienced surgeon. The method includes four principles: (1) modified PVC-sparing technique, according to Richard Gaston et al., (2) the use of near-infrared fluorescence technology and indocyanine green to identify the benchmark artery of the neurovascular bundle and blood supply for the PVC, (3) accessory pudendal artery preservation, and (4) hypothermia to reduce tissue edema. Functional outcomes, including continence, potency, and other surgical findings, are presented. This is a feasibility case series, not a comparative or hypothesis-testing study. Results: This study enrolled 33 cases from 15 April 2020 to 31 December 2022. Four patients had positive surgical margins. The urinary continence rate was 100% after Foley removal at a mean of 6.6 days. The potency rate was 74% (17/23) at 6 months and 91.3% (21/23) at 12 months. The inclusion of a small sample of patients from a single hospital and the selection of patient conditions were the study limitations. Conclusions: The modified approach we described is technically feasible, and it can expedite the restoration of urinary function and potency preservation. No severe complications occurred, and patients achieved good oncological outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach globally, and various techniques have been proposed to improve functional outcomes. Despite these advances, however, functional impairment associated with surgery remains a major concern that affects patients’ quality of life. Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) has been proposed as a surgical technique to preserve the Retzius space, and increasing evidence has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, the effect of RS-RARP on other functions remains unknown. Although some reports show the positive effect of Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) on urinary incontinence, the effects on other functions remain unknown. Methods: The present study retrospectively analyzed 132 patients who underwent RARP at Kitasato University Hospital between January 2020 and July 2021 (49 and 83 patients in the RS-RARP and conventional RARP groups, respectively). We compared the functional outcomes of RS-RARP and conventional RARP (C-RARP) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). In addition, sexual function was compared among patients who underwent nerve-sparing procedures. Results: Our findings revealed that, even at 12 months postoperatively, RS-RARP demonstrated significant preservation of urinary continence (p < 0.01) and sexual function compared to C-RARP (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the bowel or hormonal domains. Even in patients who underwent nerve-sparing surgery, the EPIC score 12 months postoperatively was significantly higher with RS-RARP than with C-RARP (p < 0.01). RS-RARP tended to result in positive surgical margins more often than C-RARP (RS-RARP: 44.9%, C-RARP: 28.9%, p = 0.06), without affecting the rate of biochemical recurrence (RS-RARP: 14.2%, C-RARP: 15.7%, p = 0.81). Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential advantage of RS-RARP in preserving both urinary and sexual function. Full article

Background/Objectives: The da Vinci Single-Port (SP) system represents a recent evolution in robotic-assisted surgery, offering enhanced articulation and access through a single incision. The SP system was approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) in January 2024. Methods: This review synthesizes current clinical evidence on the feasibility, safety, and versatility of SP-assisted procedures across multiple surgical specialties to date based on a comprehensive literature search conducted through major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) according to PRISMA and PICOS guidelines. Results: A total of 14 studies were included, highlighting that the SP platform has been successfully adopted in complex procedures such as cervical esophagectomy, radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, gynecologic procedures, and wall surgery. Across indications, the SP approach is associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and low complication rates. On the other hand, limitations include restricted working space and the steep learning curve. Conclusions: Overall, the da Vinci SP platform expands the scope of minimally invasive surgery, but European centers lag behind international trends, particularly when compared to new, less-invasive techniques adopted in high-volume SP centers in the US. Urology remains the main field of application. Full article

Background: The widespread adoption of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has led to a growing number of men subsequently diagnosed with localized prostate cancer requiring radical prostatectomy (RP). However, anatomical alterations after HoLEP may increase surgical complexity and affect outcomes. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of RP following HoLEP. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through to September 2025 in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251134483). Eligible studies included patients undergoing RP after HoLEP with reported perioperative, oncologic, or functional data. Methodological quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and results were synthesized narratively. Results: Eight retrospective studies comprising 202 patients were included. RP after HoLEP was technically feasible across open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. Operative time and the need for bladder-neck reconstruction were increased, reflecting post-enucleation fibrosis, but major complication rates (<5%) and blood loss were comparable to primary RP. Oncological outcomes were preserved, with positive surgical margin rates of 6–20% and biochemical recurrence rates of 7–15%, similar to those of primary RP. Functional recovery, particularly urinary continence, was slower initially but generally equivalent at 12 months. Erectile function outcomes were variable but satisfactory when nerve-sparing was feasible. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy after HoLEP is a technically demanding yet safe procedure that achieves oncologic and long-term functional outcomes comparable to primary prostatectomy. Prior HoLEP should not preclude curative surgical management of prostate cancer, provided the operation is performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Full article

Introduction: Surgical management of prostate cancer has evolved significantly over more than a century, transitioning from open procedures to modern robot-assisted techniques. This narrative review traces the historical progression of surgical treatments for localized prostate cancer, from early approaches to the most recent advancements. Materials and Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted from 1 April to 1 June 2025, using PubMed and cross-referencing citations. The search gathered studies on the evolution of prostate cancer surgery, technical aspects, and comparisons between surgical and non-surgical treatments. Keywords included “PROSTATE CANCER”, “PROSTATE CANCER SURGICAL TREATMENT”, “RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY EVOLUTION”, “ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY”, and “FOCAL THERAPY AND PROSTATE CANCER”. Results: A total of 65 manuscripts, including original articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials focusing on the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer, were selected. The review begins with the history of prostatic surgery, chronicling its evolution through laparoscopic and, ultimately, robotic approaches. It highlights how improved visualization and new technologies have led to better functional outcomes and preservation of structures while maintaining oncological safety. A specific focus is placed on the technical evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, new robotic platforms, and the role of focal therapy as an ultra-minimally invasive technique for localized disease. Conclusions: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy represents the current reference surgical technique for localized prostate cancer. However, it is crucial to acknowledge RALP’s elevated cost and the need for further long-term, randomized data to establish definitive oncological equivalence compared to non-surgical options. Full article

Introduction/Background: Treatment of localized prostate cancer includes radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). While multiple guidelines recommend PLND for staging purposes, recent data has shown questionable therapeutic benefit. Thus, understanding the morbidity associated with PLND is important for counseling patients. We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) targeted prostatectomy database to quantify real-world 30-day postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing contemporary robot-assisted PLND at the time of RP for prostate cancer to quantify the incremental morbidity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the NSQIP database of adult patients undergoing radical prostatectomy from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcomes were procedure-specific outcomes such as lymphocele and rectal injury. Secondary outcomes included a composite of any of the following 30-day major postoperative outcomes: mortality, reoperation, cardiac or neurologic event, as well as the individual components of this outcome, as well as infectious and other complications. We also analyzed yearly trends associated with PLND. Groups were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio using demographic characteristics, prior medical history, and cancer staging data. Likelihood of complications was assessed by conditional logistic regression. Results: We identified 13,413 patients between 2019 and 2022 who underwent robotic prostatectomy: 11,341 (85%) had PLND while 2072 (15%) did not. After PSM, our cohort included 2071 matched pairs of patients with and without PLND. Patients who underwent PLND were more likely to be diagnosed with lymphocele (2.14% vs. 0.68%, OR 4.17; 95% CI 2.00, 8.68), have unplanned readmission (4.22% vs. 3.27%, OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.03, 1.65), and develop organ-site/space SSI (1.18% vs. 0.60%) (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.20, 3.23). There was no significant association between the receipt of PLND and the likelihood of urinary leak or fistula, or ureteral obstruction. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to secondary outcomes of interest. Conclusion: Contemporary robotic PLND is associated with a 3-fold increased likelihood of lymphocele, as well as increased likelihood of unplanned readmission and organ-site SSI, though no significant differences in major postoperative complications were identified. We found that the odds of lymphoceles, readmission, and SSI in our study are lower than previously reported. These data provide real-world data to guide patient counseling and optimize patient selection for PLND at the time of RALP. Full article

Background and Objectives: Effective perioperative pain management remains a key goal of enhanced recovery protocols, especially in minimally invasive urologic surgery, where optimizing comfort while limiting opioid exposure is essential. Intravenous lidocaine has gained attention for its multimodal analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, yet evidence in robotic prostatectomy remains limited. This study evaluated whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid use in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted at Pelican Clinical Hospital, Oradea, Romania, including 112 patients operated on between January 2020 and December 2023. All procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthetic teams using standardized ERAS-based protocols. Patients were divided into two groups: the Lidocaine Group (LG, n = 51), who received a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h during surgery, and the Control Group (CG, n = 61), who received standard anesthesia without lidocaine. Postoperative pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 0, 4, 12, and 24 h, and opioid use was converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to ambulation, gastrointestinal recovery, oral intake, hospital stay, and complications. Results: Pain intensity was significantly lower in the lidocaine group at 4 h postoperatively (VAS 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.01), with similar scores later. Total opioid use was reduced by about 18% in the lidocaine group (25.7 ± 9.4 vs. 31.2 ± 10.5 MME; p = 0.03). Recovery parameters and complication rates were comparable between groups, and no lidocaine-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid requirements after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without affecting recovery or safety. Its favorable profile and low cost support its inclusion as a practical adjunct in multimodal analgesia within ERAS pathways. Full article

Background/Objectives: Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a common and distressing complication following radical prostatectomy (RP). This prospective observational study aimed to assess the effectiveness of structured pelvic floor rehabilitation and to identify clinical and surgical predictors of continence recovery. Methods: A total of 182 patients undergoing RP received standardized physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), including supervised sessions before and after surgery, as well as individualized home exercise programs. UI severity was evaluated using a 1 h pad test and a four-level UI stage classification at three time points. The primary outcomes were changes in UI stage and the achievement of full continence, defined as a pad test result ≤2 g. Results: Following three rehabilitation sessions, 80.2% of patients regained full continence. Preoperative PFMT (β = −1.27, p = 0.0061) and shorter time to rehabilitation (β = −0.04, p = 0.0026) were associated with greater improvement in continence outcomes. Patients treated with robot-assisted RP showed a higher probability of continence recovery compared to those undergoing laparoscopic RP, particularly in the presence of moderate to severe baseline incontinence. Higher baseline urinary leakage significantly decreased the odds of treatment success (β = −0.01, p = 0.0001). ISUP grade and extraprostatic extension were not independently associated with outcomes. Conclusions: Despite the absence of a control group, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of structured and personalized pelvic floor rehabilitation in improving post-RP continence. Early initiation and preoperative training should be prioritized to optimize recovery in routine clinical practice. Full article

Background/Objectives: While robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the standard surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer, patients with marked prostatomegaly may experience worse outcomes. The current literature lacks generalizable, multi-surgeon data examining surgical complications in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2030 patients who underwent RARP at a tertiary academic referral center. Perioperative complications and oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with marked prostatomegaly (defined as a prostate volume >100 grams (g)) and those with average-sized glands (<100 g). Logistic regression was used to compare groups. Results: Patients with marked prostatomegaly had a lower PSA density (0.10 vs. 0.20, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in pathologic NCCN grade groups, margin status, or lymph node involvement between groups. Patients with marked prostatomegaly had 60% higher odds of experiencing perioperative complications (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25–2.07, p < 0.0003) and were over twice as likely to have an ED visit or hospital readmission following surgery (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.79–2.61, p < 0.001). They were also 25% more likely to undergo non-nerve-sparing or unilateral nerve-sparing procedures (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11–1.42, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Marked prostatomegaly is associated with higher rates of perioperative complications following RARP, with more frequent emergency room visits and readmissions. While nerve-sparing procedures were less commonly performed, oncologic outcomes remained comparable. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate these results, which impact preoperative counseling. Full article

Objectives: To evaluate the density percentage of biopsy-positive cores (BPCs) relative to prostate volume, defined as Id-BPC, compared with BPCs as a predictor of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) in EAU high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated and staged with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: Overall, 254 EAU high-risk patients were treated with RARP between January 2013 and December 2021. Results: Overall, PLNI was detected in 23.2% of patients who were more likely to present with standard adverse clinical features; likewise, on multivariate models, PLNI was independently predicted by both BPC and Id-BPC with the latter showing a stronger association (OR = 1.926; 95% CI: 1.246–2.977; p = 0.003) than the former (OR = 1.028; 95% CI: 1.014–1.042; p < 0.0001); moreover, when cancer density was categorized at Id-BPC ≥ 1.0 versus < 1.0, the prediction was even stronger (OR = 3.535; 95% CI: 1.551–8.054; p = 0.003). Conclusions: In the investigated population, Id-BPC was a stronger predictor of PLNI than BPC; accordingly, as Id-BPC increased, patients were more likely to have PLNI; equivalently, subjects presenting with Id-BPC less than one were 3.5 times less likely to have PLNI. This information has implications for clinical practice as well as for computing nomograms or patterns of artificial intelligence networks. Full article

Background: Locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is commonly treated with multimodal therapy; however, long-term outcomes of surgery alone are poorly defined. We investigated the potential and limitations of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as primary treatment without perioperative systemic therapy in patients with locally advanced PCa. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 258 patients who underwent RARP with extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2012 and 2022 with locally advanced PCa, defined as present if at least one of the following was met: clinical stage cT3b–T4; primary Gleason pattern 5; >4 biopsy cores with Grade Group 4 or 5; or more than one NCCN high-risk characteristic. Patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Endpoints included biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and predictors of persistent PSA. Results: Median follow-up was 60.6 months. Pathological stage ≥ pT3a occurred in 63.6% and nodal involvement (pN1) in 27.1%. Five-year BRFS, MFS, and CSS were 36.6%, 88.9%, and 98.3%, respectively. Persistent PSA occurred in 21.3%. Preoperative predictors included PSA > 40 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ cT3a, and >4 biopsy cores with a Gleason score of 8–10; patients with ≥2 features had significantly poorer BRFS and MFS. Postoperative predictors of recurrence were pathological stage, lymphovascular invasion, and nodal involvement. Conclusions: RARP alone provided durable long-term cancer control in selected men with locally advanced PCa, whereas patients with multiple adverse features were unlikely to be cured with surgery alone. Careful risk stratification may identify candidates for surgical monotherapy and help avoid overtreatment, while others may benefit from multimodal therapy. Full article

Background: This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1125 patients who underwent RARP between July 2013 and December 2023. The dataset was divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%) using a stratified sampling strategy. Five ML models were developed using the training set. Model performance was evaluated on the testing set using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 scores. Additionally, model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to determine the contribution of individual features. Results: Among the five ML models, the LightGBM model achieved the best prediction ability with an AUC of 0.881 (95%CI: 0.840–0.922) in the testing set. For model interpretability, SHAP values explained the contribution of individual features to the model, revealing that pathological T stage (pT), positive surgical margin (PSM), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir, initial PSA, systematic prostate biopsy positive rate, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), pathological International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (pGG), and perineural invasion (PI) were the key contributors to the predictive performance. Conclusions: We developed and validated ML models to predict BCR following RARP and identified that the LightGBM model with 8 variables achieved promising performance and demonstrated a high level of clinical applicability. Full article