Next Article in Journal
Sarcomatoid and Aggressive Variants in High R.E.N.A.L. Score T1b RCC: Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Radical Nephrectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Management of Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Comparison of International Guidelines from Scientific Societies (AIOM-BGCS-ESGO-ESMO-JGSO-NCCN-NICE)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Narrative Review of Treatment Options for Patients with Node-Positive Disease After Radical Prostatectomy: Current Evidence and Controversies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comparative Analysis of the Functional Outcomes Between Retzius-Sparing and Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite

1
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara Campus, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan
2
Department of Urology, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato City 108-8642, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(24), 3913; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243913 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 November 2025 / Revised: 4 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 7 December 2025

Simple Summary

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a common prostate cancer surgery; however, functional impairment after the procedure remains a significant concern. Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) is a technique used to improve functional outcomes. We compared the functional outcomes of RS-RARP and conventional RARP (C-RARP) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). In addition, sexual function was compared among patients who underwent nerve-sparing procedures. RS-RARP demonstrated significant preservation of urinary continence and sexual function compared to C-RARP at 12 months post-surgery (p <0.05). Notably, among patients who underwent nerve-sparing surgery, the RS-RARP group had a significantly higher sexual summary score than the C-RARP group (p < 0.05). Although RS-RARP showed a slightly higher positive surgical margin rate, it did not significantly affect biochemical recurrence (p = 0.81). These findings suggest RS-RARP’s potential in preserving both urinary and sexual function, offering improved quality of life for patients.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach globally, and various techniques have been proposed to improve functional outcomes. Despite these advances, however, functional impairment associated with surgery remains a major concern that affects patients’ quality of life. Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) has been proposed as a surgical technique to preserve the Retzius space, and increasing evidence has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, the effect of RS-RARP on other functions remains unknown. Although some reports show the positive effect of Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) on urinary incontinence, the effects on other functions remain unknown. Methods: The present study retrospectively analyzed 132 patients who underwent RARP at Kitasato University Hospital between January 2020 and July 2021 (49 and 83 patients in the RS-RARP and conventional RARP groups, respectively). We compared the functional outcomes of RS-RARP and conventional RARP (C-RARP) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). In addition, sexual function was compared among patients who underwent nerve-sparing procedures. Results: Our findings revealed that, even at 12 months postoperatively, RS-RARP demonstrated significant preservation of urinary continence (p < 0.01) and sexual function compared to C-RARP (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the bowel or hormonal domains. Even in patients who underwent nerve-sparing surgery, the EPIC score 12 months postoperatively was significantly higher with RS-RARP than with C-RARP (p < 0.01). RS-RARP tended to result in positive surgical margins more often than C-RARP (RS-RARP: 44.9%, C-RARP: 28.9%, p = 0.06), without affecting the rate of biochemical recurrence (RS-RARP: 14.2%, C-RARP: 15.7%, p = 0.81). Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential advantage of RS-RARP in preserving both urinary and sexual function.
Keywords: RS-RARP; sexual function; EPIC RS-RARP; sexual function; EPIC

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shimura, S.; Koguchi, D.; Tabata, K.-i.; Shiba, I.; Shiono, Y.; Mori, K.; Hirano, S.; Ikeda, M.; Tsumura, H.; Ishii, D.; et al. A Comparative Analysis of the Functional Outcomes Between Retzius-Sparing and Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Cancers 2025, 17, 3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243913

AMA Style

Shimura S, Koguchi D, Tabata K-i, Shiba I, Shiono Y, Mori K, Hirano S, Ikeda M, Tsumura H, Ishii D, et al. A Comparative Analysis of the Functional Outcomes Between Retzius-Sparing and Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Cancers. 2025; 17(24):3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shimura, Soichiro, Dai Koguchi, Ken-ichi Tabata, Izuru Shiba, Yutaka Shiono, Kohei Mori, Shuhei Hirano, Masaomi Ikeda, Hideyasu Tsumura, Daisuke Ishii, and et al. 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of the Functional Outcomes Between Retzius-Sparing and Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite" Cancers 17, no. 24: 3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243913

APA Style

Shimura, S., Koguchi, D., Tabata, K.-i., Shiba, I., Shiono, Y., Mori, K., Hirano, S., Ikeda, M., Tsumura, H., Ishii, D., & Matsumoto, K. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of the Functional Outcomes Between Retzius-Sparing and Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Cancers, 17(24), 3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop