Search Results (5)

Potassium sulfide KFeS₂ (hanswilkeite) has been identified in polymineralic inclusions in a diamond from the Udachnaya kimberlite pipe (Siberian craton, Yakutia). This is the second occurrence of hanswilkeite in nature and the first one in mantle-derived samples. Sulfide KFeS₂ is monoclinic, the space group—C 2/c. Its crystal structure consists of chains with K in the interstices. The tetrahedra are centered by iron ions and linked by edges, thus forming chains of [FeS₂] frameworks. The strongest lines of the electron diffraction powder pattern are 7.05 Å—(200); 5.34 Å (0$\overline{2}$0); and 3.05 Å (2$\overline{2}$0), and the angles between directions are <2$\overline{2}$0/0$\overline{2}$0>—60° and <2$\overline{2}$0/200>—30°. KFeS₂ has been found as a discrete phase within polymineralic inclusions consisting of apatite, ilmenite, chondrodite, phlogopite, dolomite, and a fluid phase. The data obtained from the composition of the hanswilkeite (KFeS₂) inclusion and other rare minerals (chondrodite, Mg-apatite, Cr-ilmenite) in primary inclusions in a diamond from the Udachnaya kimberlite testify to the important role of metasomatic processes in diamond formation. Full article

Polymineralic inclusions in loparite-(Ce) in alkaline rocks from the Lovozero massif (Russia) were investigated using electron microprobe analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. A total of 21 mineral species and two groups of minerals (pyrochlore- and labuntsovite-group minerals) were found in these inclusions. Minerals in loparite-hosted inclusions can be divided into two groups: (1) minerals found typically in rocks bearing loparite-(Ce) grains (groundmass minerals) such as aegirine, magnesio-arfvedsonite, potassic feldspar, albite, fluorapatite, etc.; and (2) minerals that were not found in the rock outside of the loparite-(Ce) grains. The latter include lorenzenite, labuntsovite-group minerals, minerals of the neptunite–manganoneptunite series, vinogradovite, catapleiite, fluorite, britholite-(Ce), barylite, genthelvite, and barite, found in the studied samples exclusively inside loparite-(Ce) crystals. The minerals of the second group are typical hydrothermal minerals. We assume that the skeletal crystals of loparite-(Ce), when growing, captured both co-crystallizing minerals and small drops of the mineral-forming solution. Such drops subsequently crystallized within the loparite-(Ce), resulting in the formation of a hydrothermal mineral association. Full article

A chromite occurrence called the Sabantuy paleoplacer was discovered in the Southern Pre-Ural region, at the east edge of the East-European Platform in the transitional zone to the Ural Foredeep. A ca. 1 m-thick chromite-bearing horizon is traced at a depth of 0.7–1.5 m from the earth’s surface for the area of ca. 15,000 m². The chromspinel content in sandstones reaches 30–35%, maximum values of Cr₂O₃ are 16–17 wt.%. The grain size of detrital chromspinel ranges from 0.15 to 0.25 mm. Subangular octahedral crystals dominate; rounded grains and debris are rare. The composition of detrital chromspinel varies widely and is constrained by the substitution of Al³⁺ and Cr³⁺, Fe²⁺ and Mg²⁺ cations. Chemically, low-Al (Al₂O₃ = 12 wt.%) and high-Cr (Cr₂O₃ = 52–56 wt.%) chromspinel prevail. The compositional analysis using discrimination diagrams showed that most chromites correspond to mantle peridotites of subduction settings. Volcanic rocks could be an additional source for detrital chromites. It is confirmed by compositions of monomineralic, polymineralic and melt inclusions in chromspinels. The presented data indicates that ophiolite peridotites and related chromite ore associated with oceanic and island-arc volcanic rocks, widespread in the Ural orogen, could be the main sources of the detrital chromspinel of the Sabantuy paleoplacer. Full article

No genetic link between the two main types of chromitite, stratiform and podiform chromitites, has ever been discussed. These two types of chromitite have very different geological contexts; the stratiform one is a member of layered intrusions, representing fossil magma chambers, in the crust, and the podiform one forms pod-like bodies, representing fossil magma conduits, in the upper mantle. Chromite grains contain peculiar polymineralic inclusions derived from Na-bearing hydrous melts, whose features are so similar between the two types that they may form in a similar fashion. The origin of the chromite-hosted inclusions in chromitites has been controversial but left unclear. The chromite-hosted inclusions also characterize the products of the peridotite–melt reaction or melt-assisted partial melting, such as dunites, troctolites and even mantle harzburgites. I propose a common origin for the inclusion-bearing chromites, i.e., a reaction between the mantle peridotite and magma. Some of the chromite grains in the stratiform chromitite originally formed in the mantle through the peridotite–magma reaction, possibly as loose-packed young podiform chromitites, and were subsequently disintegrated and transported to a crustal magma chamber as suspended grains. It is noted, however, that the podiform chromitites left in the mantle beneath the layered intrusions are different from most of the podiform chromitites now exposed in the ophiolites. Full article

Polymineralic inclusions in megacrysts have been reported to occur in kimberlites worldwide. The inclusions are likely the products of early kimberlite melt(s) which invaded the pre-existing megacryst minerals at mantle depths (i.e., at pressures ranging from 4 to 6 GPa) and crystallized or quenched upon emplacement of the host kimberlite. The abundance of carbonate minerals (e.g., calcite, dolomite) and hydrous silicate minerals (e.g., phlogopite, serpentine, chlorite) within polymineralic inclusions suggests that the trapped melt was more volatile-rich than the host kimberlite now emplaced in the crust. However, the exact composition of this presumed early kimberlite melt, including the inventory of trace elements and volatiles, remains to be more narrowly constrained. For instance, one major question concerns the role of accessory alkali-halogen-phases in polymineralic inclusions, i.e., whether such phases constitute a common primary feature of kimberlite melt(s), or whether they become enriched in late-stage differentiation processes. Recent studies have shown that polymineralic inclusions react with their host minerals during ascent of the kimberlite, while being largely shielded from processes that affect the host kimberlite, e.g., the assimilation of xenoliths (mantle and crustal), degassing of volatiles, and secondary alteration. Importantly, some polymineralic inclusions within different megacryst minerals were shown to preserve fresh glass. A major conclusion of this review is that the abundance and mineralogy of polymineralic inclusions are directly influenced by the physical and chemical properties of their host minerals. When taking the different interactions with their host minerals into account, polymineralic inclusions in megacrysts can serve as useful proxies for the multi-stage origin and evolution of kimberlite melt/magma, because they can (i) reveal information about primary characteristics of the kimberlite melt, and (ii) trace the evolution of kimberlite magma on its way from the upper mantle to the crust. Full article