Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (205)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = perioperative pathway

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 401 KB  
Review
Evidence-Based Strategies for the Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review
by Mantė Agnė Rimkienė, Diana Sudavičienė, Gediminas Račkauskas, Paulius Jurkuvėnas, Veronika Gorevska, Julius Stukas and Germanas Marinskis
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 991; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050991 (registering DOI) - 19 May 2026
Viewed by 184
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections remain among the most serious complications of pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy procedures. They are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, system extraction, long-term antimicrobial therapy, and increased healthcare costs. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections remain among the most serious complications of pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy procedures. They are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, system extraction, long-term antimicrobial therapy, and increased healthcare costs. As most infections arise from perioperative contamination or procedure-related complications, prevention has become a major priority in contemporary electrophysiology practice. This review aimed to summarize current evidence on the prevention of CIED infections, with particular emphasis on modifiable risk factors and perioperative preventive measures. Materials and Methods: A focused narrative review was undertaken using targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, supplemented by major international guideline and consensus documents, with priority given to contemporary guidelines, randomised trials, meta-analyses, and major observational studies relevant to CIED infection prevention. Results: Prevention of CIED infection requires a structured, multifactorial approach spanning the entire procedural pathway. Key preventive strategies include careful reassessment of device indication, individualized device selection, correction of modifiable risk factors, postponement of elective implantation in the presence of active infection, appropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and optimized management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy to minimize pocket hematoma. Additional relevant measures include meticulous skin antisepsis, limitation of temporary invasive devices and unnecessary hardware, appropriate venous access selection, careful generator pocket creation and wound closure, and avoidance of early reintervention whenever feasible. Antibacterial envelopes may reduce major CIED infections in selected high-risk patients, whereas routine escalation of preventive measures without proven benefit is not supported. Conclusions: CIED infection prevention is inherently multifactorial and depends on the consistent application of evidence-based measures before, during, and after device implantation. Rigorous control of modifiable risk factors, prevention of pocket hematoma, appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis, and meticulous procedural technique remain the cornerstones of effective infection prevention in patients undergoing CIED procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
15 pages, 1069 KB  
Article
Association of Cancer Stage and Comorbidity Burden with 12-Month Clinically Significant Cognitive Decline After Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: A Competing-Risk Retrospective Cohort Study
by Jaehak Jung, Byoungryun Kim, Taewan Won, Gyumin Choi, Kyongseo Kim and Cheol Lee
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 988; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050988 (registering DOI) - 19 May 2026
Viewed by 144
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We aimed to determine whether gynecologic cancer–related factors are associated with postoperative clinically significant cognitive decline (CCD) after accounting for age and comorbidity using competing-risk models. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult women undergoing index [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: We aimed to determine whether gynecologic cancer–related factors are associated with postoperative clinically significant cognitive decline (CCD) after accounting for age and comorbidity using competing-risk models. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult women undergoing index surgery for gynecologic cancer at a tertiary university hospital. CCD was defined as new clinician-documented cognitive impairment, neurology/psychiatry consultation, or initiation of cognition-targeted pharmacotherapy ≥30 days postoperatively. Competing events were all-cause death and major neurologic events/hospice. We fit Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models adjusted for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), cancer stage, and treatment intensity, and evaluated a prespecified age × stage interaction. Results: Among 1023 eligible patients (mean age 62.4 ± 11.8 years; 41.3% International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage III–IV; median CCI 3 [IQR 2–5]), CCD occurred in 98 (9.6%). The 12-month cumulative incidence of CCD was 11.2% accounting for competing risks. Advanced stage was independently associated with higher CCD risk (sHR 1.85, 95% CI 1.27–2.69; p = 0.001). A significant age × stage interaction was observed (p < 0.001), with the strongest association in patients ≥70 years (sHR 2.48, 95% CI 1.61–3.81). Perioperative factors associated with CCD included open surgery (sHR 1.54) and postoperative delirium (sHR 2.76); these findings should be interpreted as associative signals rather than validated causal treatment targets. A stratified blinded chart review of 160 patients (80 flagged-positive and 80 unflagged controls) supported the CCD definition (PPV 88.8%; sensitivity 72.1%; specificity 94.3%; NPV 91.5%). Visit-frequency adjustment confirmed robustness (advanced stage sHR 1.78; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Gynecologic cancer–related factors, particularly advanced stage, are independently associated with CCD after accounting for competing risks, and high-risk phenotypes (age ≥70, FIGO III–IV) may benefit from perioperative pathways integrating cognitive screening, delirium prevention, and neurocognitive follow-up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 702 KB  
Article
Association of Preoperative Platelet-Activating Factor and Postoperative C-Reactive Protein with Inflammatory Burden and Early Outcomes After Major Cardiac Surgery
by Adrian Stef, Gabriel Cismaru, Aurelia Georgeta Solomonean, Nadina Tintiuc, Tudor-Mihai Magdaș and Alexandru Oprea
Biomedicines 2026, 14(5), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14051149 - 19 May 2026
Viewed by 224
Abstract
Background: Major cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces a systemic inflammatory response that contributes to postoperative organ dysfunction and hemodynamic instability. While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-established downstream marker of postoperative inflammation, the upstream determinants of interindividual variability in inflammatory burden [...] Read more.
Background: Major cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces a systemic inflammatory response that contributes to postoperative organ dysfunction and hemodynamic instability. While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-established downstream marker of postoperative inflammation, the upstream determinants of interindividual variability in inflammatory burden are not fully understood. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent inflammatory mediator implicated in platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular dysregulation, but its role in modulating postoperative inflammation and clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery has not been fully characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 87 patients undergoing major cardiac surgery with CPB. Preoperative plasma PAF levels and postoperative CRP concentrations were measured, and patients were stratified according to postoperative CRP severity. Associations between PAF, inflammatory response, postoperative vasoactive–inotropic requirements, recovery parameters, acute kidney injury, and mortality were assessed using correlation analyses, multivariable regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results: Preoperative PAF levels increased progressively across postoperative CRP strata (p < 0.001) and were strongly associated with postoperative CRP concentrations in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Specifically, each 1000 pg/mL increase in preoperative PAF was associated with an adjusted increase of 36.0 mg/L in postoperative CRP (β = 36.0; p < 0.001). Each 1000 pg/mL increase in preoperative PAF was associated with an adjusted increase of approximately 36 mg/L in postoperative CRP. Elevated PAF was also associated with increased intermediate postoperative vasoactive–inotropic requirements and a modest increase in hospital length of stay (r = 0.25, p = 0.023). However, neither PAF nor CRP independently predicted AKI or mortality after adjustment for clinical variables. Discriminative performance for mortality was modest for both biomarkers. Conclusions: Preoperative platelet-activating factor was strongly associated with postoperative inflammatory burden and early hemodynamic instability following major cardiac surgery. Although PAF and CRP were not independent predictors of adverse outcomes, they may help identify a biologically vulnerable phenotype characterized by exaggerated inflammatory and vascular responses to surgical stress. These findings support further investigation of platelet-mediated inflammatory pathways as targets for perioperative risk stratification and mechanistic research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 961 KB  
Review
Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Translational Insights from Stroke and Traumatic Injury for Biomarker Development
by James A. Kelly, Miranda Witheford, Kong Teng Tan, Tiam Feridooni, Daniyal Mahmood, Carmen Garcia-Mere and Thomas F. Lindsay
Biomedicines 2026, 14(5), 1144; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14051144 - 18 May 2026
Viewed by 194
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a severe complication of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in operative techniques, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, with no reliable biomarkers available for early detection or risk stratification. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a severe complication of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in operative techniques, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, with no reliable biomarkers available for early detection or risk stratification. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiology of SCI following aortic intervention, integrating insights from ischemic stroke and traumatic spinal cord injury to identify key mechanistic pathways and potential biomarker targets. Results: SCI results from multifactorial impairment of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) driven by extensive aortic coverage, disruption of segmental arterial inflow, hypotension, and impaired collateral circulation. While acute hypoperfusion initiates injury, secondary processes—including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation—drive progression. Cytokine signaling and immune activation contribute to blood–spinal cord barrier disruption and vasogenic edema, with Aquaporin-4 playing a central role in delayed injury. Candidate biomarkers, including neuron-specific enolase, S100β, and glial fibrillary acidic protein, reflect neuronal damage but lack sufficient sensitivity and temporal resolution for clinical use. Emerging evidence supports a multimodal biomarker approach incorporating inflammatory, structural, and Aquaporin-4-dependent edema-related pathways. Conclusions: Spinal cord ischemia following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a dynamic and multifactorial process in which reduced spinal cord perfusion pressure represents a final common pathway linking diverse perioperative factors to ischemic injury. Secondary mechanisms, particularly neuroinflammation and Aquaporin-4-driven vasogenic edema, play a central role in injury propagation and represent promising targets for biomarker development. Future strategies should focus on longitudinal, multimodal biomarker approaches to improve early detection, risk stratification, and therapeutic intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Aneurysm: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 628 KB  
Review
Perioperative Anesthesia Strategies for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways: A Clinical Narrative Review
by Rachel Dombrower, Alyssa McKenzie, Andrew J. Tucker and Johnathan Atwell
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3829; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103829 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 243
Abstract
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain a leading preventable perioperative complication despite advances in anesthetic and surgical care, significantly affecting recovery within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. ERAS protocols provide a structured, multidisciplinary framework for perioperative optimization; however, variability in the implementation [...] Read more.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain a leading preventable perioperative complication despite advances in anesthetic and surgical care, significantly affecting recovery within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. ERAS protocols provide a structured, multidisciplinary framework for perioperative optimization; however, variability in the implementation of PONV prevention strategies persists. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on perioperative strategies for PONV prevention within ERAS pathways, focusing on patient risk stratification, multimodal pharmacologic prophylaxis, anesthetic techniques, and adjunctive non-pharmacologic interventions. We evaluate validated risk prediction tools, including the Apfel score, and highlight the importance of individualized prophylactic strategies based on patient, surgical, and anesthetic risk factors. Multimodal antiemetic regimens, opioid-sparing anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and regional techniques are discussed as key components of perioperative management. In addition, non-pharmacologic interventions such as optimized fluid therapy, early mobilization, and supportive perioperative care are reviewed as integral elements of ERAS-based recovery pathways. Complementing existing consensus guidelines, this review provides a practical, workflow-based framework spanning preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative monitoring for direct application within ERAS protocols. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1229 KB  
Systematic Review
Beyond Pooled Estimates: A Stratified Systematic Review with Quantitative Comparisons of Surgical Approaches and Diversion Strategies After Radical Cystectomy
by Razvan Danau, Flaviu Ionut Faur, Aida Iancu, Cosmin Burta, Andrei Paunescu, Silviu Latcu, Ciprian Duta, Ioana Adelina Faur, Paul Pasca, Catalin Prodan Barbulescu, Vlad Braicu, Amadeus Dobrescu and Dan Brebu
Life 2026, 16(5), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16050811 (registering DOI) - 13 May 2026
Viewed by 171
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) remains associated with substantial perioperative morbidity despite advances in minimally invasive surgery and reconstructive techniques. Comparisons between intracorporeal reconstruction, robotic-assisted approaches, and urinary diversion strategies are frequently confounded by clinical heterogeneity and patient selection. This study aimed to perform [...] Read more.
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) remains associated with substantial perioperative morbidity despite advances in minimally invasive surgery and reconstructive techniques. Comparisons between intracorporeal reconstruction, robotic-assisted approaches, and urinary diversion strategies are frequently confounded by clinical heterogeneity and patient selection. This study aimed to perform a stratified surgical systematic review evaluating perioperative outcomes across distinct reconstructive pathways following RC. Methods: A PRISMA-guided systematic review identified comparative studies evaluating intracorporeal versus extracorporeal/open orthotopic neobladder reconstruction, robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy in frail patients undergoing ureterocutaneostomy, and ileal conduit versus orthotopic urinary diversion. Analyses were performed within predefined clinical modules to preserve surgical context. Outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), complemented by rare-event sensitivity analyses and exploratory absolute risk metrics, including number needed to treat or harm (NNT/NNH). Continuous outcomes such as estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were assessed descriptively. Results: Three comparative observational cohorts met inclusion criteria. Intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction and robotic-assisted cystectomy demonstrated consistent reductions in transfusion rates and favourable trends in perioperative morbidity. In frail patient populations, robotic surgery showed reduced intraoperative burden without increased readmission or mortality. Ileal conduit diversion was associated with increased wound-related complications and infectious outcomes; however, these findings likely reflect baseline differences in patient frailty and selection. Rare-event sensitivity analyses confirmed directional consistency of treatment effects despite wide confidence intervals. Integration of absolute risk differences and NNT/NNH metrics provided clinically interpretable context for stratified outcomes. Conclusions: Minimally invasive and intracorporeal strategies following radical cystectomy may reduce perioperative burden, whereas diversion type primarily influences complication patterns rather than overall morbidity. A stratified analytical framework integrating relative and absolute effect measures may offer a more clinically meaningful approach to evaluating reconstructive strategies in heterogeneous surgical populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 844 KB  
Review
Impact of Supplemental Oxygen on Cardiovascular Physiology
by Drithi Chidanand, Rohan Cheruku, Nidhi Sree Perla, Adhira Darapaneni and Siva Kumar Panguluri
Cells 2026, 15(10), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15100871 (registering DOI) - 10 May 2026
Viewed by 417
Abstract
Supplemental oxygen is a cornerstone intervention in modern clinical practice, widely used to correct hypoxemia in emergency, perioperative, and critical care settings. While oxygen therapy is lifesaving, accumulating evidence indicates that excessive oxygen exposure can induce significant pathophysiological disturbances, particularly within the cardiovascular [...] Read more.
Supplemental oxygen is a cornerstone intervention in modern clinical practice, widely used to correct hypoxemia in emergency, perioperative, and critical care settings. While oxygen therapy is lifesaving, accumulating evidence indicates that excessive oxygen exposure can induce significant pathophysiological disturbances, particularly within the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. Hyperoxia (PaO2 > 100 mm Hg) promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the activation of pro-fibrotic pathways. When combined with mechanical ventilation, these effects are further amplified through alterations in intrathoracic pressure, reduced venous return, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance, collectively imposing hemodynamic stress on the myocardium. These mechanical and biochemical perturbations converge to drive structural, functional, and electrical remodeling of the heart, including conduction abnormalities and arrhythmogenesis. Emerging clinical insights, particularly from critically ill and COVID-19 populations, underscore the importance of titrated oxygen strategies that balance adequate tissue oxygenation with minimization of hyperoxic injury. This review synthesizes current evidence on hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress, heart-lung interactions, and mechanisms underlying myocardial remodeling to provide a comprehensive framework for optimizing oxygen therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cell Biology of Heart Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 5326 KB  
Systematic Review
The Efficacy of Fixed-Dose Diclofenac and Orphenadrine for Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review
by Nikolaos Christopoulos and Karolina Akinosoglou
Medicines 2026, 13(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines13020017 - 8 May 2026
Viewed by 301
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Postoperative pain remains a significant clinical challenge, often requiring multimodal strategies to mitigate opioid-related adverse events. The fixed-dose combination (FDC) of Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and Orphenadrine, a muscle relaxant, targets distinct nociceptive pathways to potentially enhance analgesia and reduce opioid [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Postoperative pain remains a significant clinical challenge, often requiring multimodal strategies to mitigate opioid-related adverse events. The fixed-dose combination (FDC) of Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and Orphenadrine, a muscle relaxant, targets distinct nociceptive pathways to potentially enhance analgesia and reduce opioid consumption. This systematic review aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of the fixed-dose combination of Diclofenac and Orphenadrine for postoperative pain management and quantify its opioid-sparing effect compared to standard monotherapies or placebo. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus) and clinical trial registries (including ClinicalTrials.gov and CTIS) was conducted up to 20 September 2025. Fourteen (14) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 981 adult patients undergoing various surgical procedures were included. Due to high clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) approach was utilized. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Results: The synthesis demonstrated that the FDC may improve pain relief (measured by the Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale scores) and may reduce opioid consumption compared to active comparators and placebo. The opioid-sparing effect could be correlated with a reduced incidence of dose-dependent adverse events, particularly nausea and vomiting. However, the overall certainty of the evidence was graded as “Very Low” due to the high risk of bias and lack of transparency in the included studies. Conclusions: The FDC of Diclofenac and Orphenadrine is a rational addition to multimodal postoperative analgesic regimens, which may potentially reduce the perioperative opioid burden without compromising pain control. Nevertheless, because almost all included studies suffer from severe methodological flaws, these apparent efficacy findings must be interpreted with caution. Future high-quality, pre-registered, and low-bias randomized controlled trials are required to draw firm clinical conclusions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1976 KB  
Review
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: State-of-the-Art Review of Transaxillary, Thoracotomy, and Ministernotomy Approaches
by Adam R. Kowalówka, Mikołaj Jodłowski, Ryszard Bachowski and Radosław Gocoł
Life 2026, 16(5), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16050777 - 6 May 2026
Viewed by 366
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) via transaxillary access, right anterior thoracotomy (RAT), and ministernotomy has matured from niche innovation to guideline-endorsed standard, yet comparative data remain heterogeneous and fragmented. Objectives: This state-of-the-art review synthesizes contemporary evidence to define the role of [...] Read more.
Background: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) via transaxillary access, right anterior thoracotomy (RAT), and ministernotomy has matured from niche innovation to guideline-endorsed standard, yet comparative data remain heterogeneous and fragmented. Objectives: This state-of-the-art review synthesizes contemporary evidence to define the role of each approach within modern valve care pathways. Methods: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review with PROSPERO registration identified studies reporting outcomes of isolated AVR performed through transaxillary, RAT, or ministernotomy access. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, operative times, and length of stay; secondary endpoints included complications, long-term survival, learning curves, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Forty-two studies encompassing 15,328 patients were included: transaxillary (n = 2156), RAT (n = 4892), and ministernotomy (n = 8280). All approaches achieved excellent perioperative safety (mortality 0.4–2.5%) and long-term survival comparable to full sternotomy, while consistently reducing blood loss, transfusion, ventilation time, and hospital stay. Ministernotomy offered the broadest anatomical applicability and the shortest learning curve (20–30 cases). RAT combined complete sternal preservation, the lowest bleeding rates, and superior cosmetic and functional recovery in anatomically suitable patients. Transaxillary access provided hidden scarring and attractive options in redo or sternum-avoidance scenarios, but higher reported stroke rates (2.0–6.3%) and greater technical demands limited its use to high-volume centers. Conclusions: MIAVR via ministernotomy, RAT, and transaxillary access now represents a mature, durable alternative to full sternotomy. A structured, anatomy- and center experience-driven selection strategy is essential to fully realize its benefits across diverse patient populations. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 3381 KB  
Review
From Risk Stratification to Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Imaging and Biomarkers in the Perioperative Setting
by Jeong Yoon Jang, Jae Seok Bae, Yun-Ho Cho, Yujin Shin, Han Ra Choi, Jeong Rang Park, Min Gyu Kang, Hye-Ree Kim, Yong-Lee Kim, Hyo Jin Lee, Kye-Hwan Kim, Jin-Yong Hwang, Sung-Eun Park and Jong-Hwa Ahn
Biomedicines 2026, 14(5), 1023; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14051023 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 497
Abstract
Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) remain major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality, yet optimal perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification remains challenging. This narrative review examines how cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers may be integrated to improve perioperative [...] Read more.
Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) remain major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality, yet optimal perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification remains challenging. This narrative review examines how cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers may be integrated to improve perioperative risk assessment and to support more individualized preventive strategies in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We reviewed major clinical guidelines, landmark perioperative cohort studies, and key investigations addressing coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary calcium burden, natriuretic peptides, and cardiac troponin in the perioperative setting. Available evidence suggests that imaging and biomarkers provide complementary information, with imaging primarily reflecting structural coronary disease burden and biomarkers reflecting myocardial stress, biological vulnerability, and perioperative injury. Such multimodal assessment may refine risk estimation beyond conventional clinical indices alone, particularly in selected intermediate-risk patients or those with uncertain functional capacity. However, important limitations remain. Current evidence is heterogeneous across study populations, testing strategies, and endpoints, and standardized pathways for integrating imaging and biomarkers into routine clinical decision-making are not yet established. In addition, cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and the extent to which improved risk discrimination translates into better perioperative outcomes remain uncertain. Overall, the integration of imaging and biomarkers offers a clinically relevant framework for moving from perioperative risk stratification toward prevention, but its practical implementation and outcome benefit require further prospective validation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Saving Lives from Myocardial Infarction: Prevention vs. Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 457 KB  
Article
Preoperative Surgical Fear and Association with Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery After Total Joint Arthroplasty
by Kenan Gumus, Gülden Küçükakça Çelik and Özkan Öztürk
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3451; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093451 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 228
Abstract
Background: Recovery following total joint arthroplasty varies substantially among patients, and psychological factors may partly account for this variability. Although anxiety and depression have been widely investigated, the specific contribution of preoperative surgical fear to postoperative pain and quality of recovery remains unclear. [...] Read more.
Background: Recovery following total joint arthroplasty varies substantially among patients, and psychological factors may partly account for this variability. Although anxiety and depression have been widely investigated, the specific contribution of preoperative surgical fear to postoperative pain and quality of recovery remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between preoperative surgical fear and postoperative pain intensity and quality of recovery. Methods: This prospective, hospital-based observational study enrolled 89 patients undergoing primary total knee or hip arthroplasty. Preoperative surgical fear was measured using the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ). Pain intensity was assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) preoperatively and at three postoperative time points. Recovery quality at 24 h was evaluated using the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40). Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations and identify variables independently associated with recovery outcomes, controlling for potential confounders, including age, sex, ASA physical status, and type of surgery. Results: The mean SFQ score was 26.62 ± 15.19, and the mean QoR-40 score was 157.63 ± 16.66. Surgical fear was moderately and negatively correlated with overall recovery quality (r = −0.546, p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, surgical fear was most strongly associated with poorer overall recovery quality (β = −0.563, p < 0.001), within a model explaining 30.3% of the variance (adjusted R2 = 0.303). At the subscale level, surgical fear was significantly associated with emotional state, pain, physical comfort, and perceived support. Pain intensity at 12 h postoperatively was significantly associated with reduced physical independence (β = −0.218, p = 0.038). Pain intensity peaked at 12 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Higher levels of preoperative surgical fear are associated with poorer quality of recovery following total joint arthroplasty. These findings highlight surgical fear as a potentially relevant perioperative factor and support the integration of routine psychological assessment into perioperative care pathways in relation to early postoperative recovery outcomes. From a clinical perspective, early identification of patients with high surgical fear may facilitate targeted perioperative counseling and supportive interventions by healthcare professionals, potentially improving recovery outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1150 KB  
Systematic Review
Clinical Value of Fluorescent Lymphography with Indocyanine Green During Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Guided Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Dimitra V. Peristeri, Dimitrios N. Raptis, Ioannis Mantzoros, Dimitrios Schizas, Alexandros-Georgios I. Asimakopoulos, Eirini Papadopoulou, Georgios D. Lianos, Thomas Papaziogas and Vasileios Papaziogas
J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16(5), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16050243 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 381
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic gastrectomy is increasingly used in the surgical management of gastric cancer. Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence imaging has emerged as a technique that enables real-time visualization of lymphatic drainage pathways, potentially facilitating more precise and individualized lymph node dissection. However, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Robotic gastrectomy is increasingly used in the surgical management of gastric cancer. Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence imaging has emerged as a technique that enables real-time visualization of lymphatic drainage pathways, potentially facilitating more precise and individualized lymph node dissection. However, the clinical value of ICG-guided fluorescent lymphography during robotic gastrectomy remains incompletely established. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to 31 January 2026 for comparative studies evaluating ICG-guided fluorescent lymphography versus standard robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.4.2) and the meta package. Results: Six studies, including 406 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Use of ICG was associated with a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (mean difference [MD] 8.48; 95% CI 4.61–12.36; p = 0.001; I2 = 55.5%). Operative time was modestly shorter in the ICG group (MD −10.84 min; 95% CI −21.08 to −0.61; p = 0.038). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (MD −4.02 mL; p = 0.289), length of hospital stay (MD −0.82 days; p = 0.131), or postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.46–1.49; p = 0.534). Conclusions: ICG-guided fluorescence imaging during robotic gastrectomy is associated with increased lymph node retrieval and a small reduction in operative time without evidence of increased perioperative morbidity. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings and to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Management of Abdominal Surgery and Complications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 297 KB  
Article
Patient Satisfaction and Supportive Care Pathways in a German Head and Neck Tumor Center: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
by Mario Scheurer, Philip Haller, Johannes Schulze, Stefan Kist, Robin Kasper, Lukas Greber, Alisa Schramm, Majeed Rana, Alexander Schramm, Stefan Repky, Andreas Sakkas, Marcel Ebeling and Frank Wilde
Healthcare 2026, 14(9), 1192; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091192 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 426
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Patient satisfaction and supportive care are key quality indicators in certified Head and Neck Cancer Centers (HNCC). We assessed patient-reported experiences across diagnostic staging and surgical treatment pathways, focusing on discharge management and supportive service integration. Materials and Methods: In this prospective [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Patient satisfaction and supportive care are key quality indicators in certified Head and Neck Cancer Centers (HNCC). We assessed patient-reported experiences across diagnostic staging and surgical treatment pathways, focusing on discharge management and supportive service integration. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 84 inpatients were surveyed at the time of hospital discharge after diagnostic tumor staging (n = 45) or surgical treatment (n = 39) at a German tertiary HNCC. Phase-specific standardized questionnaires with five-point Likert scales were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Associations of sex and treatment intensity with satisfaction and supportive care utilization were explored descriptively and in an exploratory manner. Results: Overall ratings were high across both cohorts for admission processes, inpatient organization and medical and nursing care, with no statistically significant between-group differences (p > 0.05). Information regarding diagnostic and perioperative procedures was rated very positively in both groups. Discharge-related items were generally favorable. However, patients who underwent surgery reported greater uncertainty and lower reported utilization of formal discharge management. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0559) and should therefore be interpreted as a non-significant trend toward less positive evaluation compared with diagnostic patients. Supportive services were rated predominantly good to very good by users (>95% positive ratings). Utilization differed by treatment intensity: Speech therapy was more frequent in operative patients (p < 0.001) and social work counseling was offered and utilized more often in patients undergoing extensive surgery (p = 0.042 and p = 0.027, respectively). Overall dissatisfaction was strongly associated with perceived deficiencies in information on diagnostic procedures and tumor-related counseling (both p < 0.001), whereas waiting time for surgery was not associated with negative overall ratings. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction was consistently high across diagnostic and surgical pathways. Adequate, transparent and repeated information, particularly on diagnostics and tumor counseling, was strongly associated with higher overall satisfaction, whereas objective timing metrics were not associated with negative ratings. Discharge management may represent a sensitive transition point, particularly after extensive surgery and may therefore be a relevant target for further optimization and proactive integration of supportive care services. Sex-specific findings were limited and should be interpreted cautiously due to small subgroup sizes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Care)
15 pages, 668 KB  
Review
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Minimalist Approaches: Anesthesia and Imaging Considerations
by Giulia Laterra, Lorenzo Scalia, Orazio Strazzieri, Federica Agnello, Claudia Reddavid, Salvatore Ingala, Daniela Russo, Chiara Barbera, Simona Guarino, Giampiero Vizzari, Antonio Micari, Massimiliano Mulè and Marco Barbanti
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3396; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093396 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 246
Abstract
The progressive aging of the atrial fibrillation (AF) population, frequently characterized by high ischemic and bleeding risks, has led to a substantial increase in referrals for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The expansion of indications and the high procedural success rate of LAAO [...] Read more.
The progressive aging of the atrial fibrillation (AF) population, frequently characterized by high ischemic and bleeding risks, has led to a substantial increase in referrals for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The expansion of indications and the high procedural success rate of LAAO have further contributed to rising procedural volumes. However, this growth introduces important challenges: LAAO candidates are often elderly and frail, with increased anesthesia-related risks, and high-volume catheterization laboratories may face logistical constraints, particularly in centers without dedicated anesthesiology support. The current gold standard approach, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) under general anesthesia (GA), ensures optimal imaging and procedural control but may increase procedural complexity and perioperative risks. In response, minimalist strategies are increasingly explored, targeting either the anesthetic protocol or the imaging modality. Conscious sedation (CS) protocols have been adopted to reduce anesthesia-related burden while maintaining TEE guidance. Alternatively, imaging-based strategies aim to replace TEE with less invasive modalities, including intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), transesophageal–intracardiac echocardiography (TE-ICE), and MicroTEE. Each approach presents specific advantages and limitations regarding safety, feasibility, operator expertise, and institutional resources. Taken together, these findings support a patient-centered approach to LAAO, whether traditional or minimalist, in which the choice of anesthetic strategy and echocardiographic guidance is driven by institutional resources, operator expertise, and individual patient characteristics rather than by expected differences in procedural or clinical efficacy. This review summarizes current evidence on minimalist LAAO pathways and discusses their role in achieving a tailored, resource-conscious procedural model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances and Future Perspectives in Interventional Cardiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 431 KB  
Review
Day Surgery in Older Adults: Safety, Effectiveness, and Best Practices for Patient Selection and Perioperative Care—A Narrative Review
by Judit Groman, Zsolt Viktor Göböl, Andrea Virág, Gyula Domján and Klara Gadó
Geriatrics 2026, 11(3), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11030054 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 252
Abstract
Background: The growing number of older adults undergoing surgical procedures requires care models that minimise hospital exposure, optimise safety, and support rapid recovery. Day surgery has become an increasingly attractive option for selected older patients, provided their medical, functional and psychosocial needs are [...] Read more.
Background: The growing number of older adults undergoing surgical procedures requires care models that minimise hospital exposure, optimise safety, and support rapid recovery. Day surgery has become an increasingly attractive option for selected older patients, provided their medical, functional and psychosocial needs are carefully assessed. Recent developments in prehabilitation, geriatric-focused perioperative pathways and enhanced post-discharge follow-up have further expanded its potential. This narrative review aims not only to synthesise current evidence, but also to provide a clinically oriented framework for patient selection, perioperative optimisation, and safe implementation of day surgery pathways in older adults. Main findings: Evidence from the past decade indicates that day surgery can be safe and effective for adults aged ≥65 when supported by structured preoperative assessment, targeted optimisation, and clear discharge criteria. Older patients benefit particularly from reduced risks of hospital-acquired complications, including infection, delirium, immobility and functional decline. Prehabilitation programmes focusing on nutrition, strength, balance and medication review are associated with improved postoperative stability and faster return to baseline function. Multidisciplinary teamwork, integrating surgeons, anaesthetists, geriatricians, nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians and caregivers, play a key role in identifying modifiable risks and ensuring continuity of care. Studies also highlight the value of post-discharge telephone follow-up, caregiver engagement and close collaboration with primary care in preventing readmissions. Conclusions: Day surgery is a viable and patient-centred option for many older adults when careful selection and preparation are combined with age-sensitive perioperative care. Most adverse outcomes can be mitigated through systematic prehabilitation, thoughtful anaesthetic planning, early mobilisation and structured follow-up. The evidence suggests that older patients may benefit from reduced hospital stay, less exposure to harm, and faster functional recovery. Implications for practice: The findings support broader integration of geriatric day surgery into routine care pathways, especially within health systems facing capacity constraints. Clinicians should consider implementing standardised geriatric assessment, multidisciplinary optimisation strategies, and robust discharge and follow-up protocols to enhance safety and effectiveness. With appropriate preparation and coordinated teamwork, day surgery can contribute meaningfully to safer, more efficient and more patient-centred surgical care for older adults. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop