Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,542)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = perioperative outcomes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 203 KiB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients
by Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Samir Ahad, Ragi Nagib, Marc Albert, Rafael Ayala, Nora Göbel, Tunjay Shavahatli, Mihnea Ghinescu, Ulrich Franke and Bartosz Rylski
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(8), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080147 (registering DOI) - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional [...] Read more.
Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach “palliative revascularization.” This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. Methods: A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. Results: Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases. Full article
14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
FLOT Versus CROSS—What Is the Optimal Therapeutic Approach for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction?
by Martin Leu, Hannes Mahler, Johanna Reinecke, Ute Margarethe König, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Manuel Guhlich, Benjamin Steuber, Marian Grade, Michael Ghadimi, Volker Ellenrieder, Stefan Rieken and Alexander Otto König
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152587 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 569 KiB  
Systematic Review
Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Aorta and Iliac Vessels: A Literature Review of the Past Decade
by Nicola Troisi, Giulia Bertagna, Sofia Pierozzi, Valerio Artini and Raffaella Berchiolli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155493 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in treating severe aortic and aorto-iliac calcifications. The aim of this study is to report current available data about the use of IVL in treating aortic and aorto-iliac calcified lesions and its application in facilitating other endovascular procedures. Methods: the present review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Preliminary searches were conducted on MEDLINE and Pubmed from January 2015 to February 2025. Studies were divided into 3 main categories depending on the location of calcifications and the type of treatment: IVL in visceral and infrarenal obstructive disease (group 1), IVL in aorto-iliac obstructive disease (group 2), IVL used to facilitate other endovascular procedures. Main primary outcomes in the perioperative period were technical and clinical successes and perioperative complications. Primary outcomes at 30 days and mid-term (2 years) were overall survival, limb salvage rate, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and residual stenosis. Results: Sixteen studies were identified for a total of 1674 patients. Technical and clinical successes were 100%, with low rates of perioperative complications. Dissection rate reaches up to 16.1% in some studies, without any differences compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) alone (22.8%; p = 0.47). At 30 days, limb salvage and survival rates were 100%. At 2 years, primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 95%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, with no difference compared to IVL + stenting. Conclusions: IVL has emerged as a novel approach to treat severe calcified lesions in visceral and aorto-iliac atherosclerotic disease and to facilitate other endovascular procedures. This technique seems to offer satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes in terms of primary, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency with low complication rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endovascular Surgery: State of the Art and Clinical Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1476 KiB  
Systematic Review
Intramedullary Nailing vs. Plate Fixation for Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
by Ümit Mert, Maher Ghandour, Moh’d Yazan Khasawneh, Filip Milicevic, Ahmad Al Zuabi, Klemens Horst, Frank Hildebrand, Bertil Bouillon, Mohamad Agha Mahmoud and Koroush Kabir
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5492; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155492 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 213
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Trochanteric femoral fractures pose significant surgical challenges, particularly in elderly patients. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation (PF) are the primary operative strategies, yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis synthesizes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate clinical, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Trochanteric femoral fractures pose significant surgical challenges, particularly in elderly patients. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plate fixation (PF) are the primary operative strategies, yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis synthesizes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate clinical, functional, perioperative, and biomechanical outcomes of IMN versus PF specifically in trochanteric fractures. Methods: A systematic search of six databases was conducted up to 20 May 2024, to identify RCTs comparing IMN and PF in adult patients with trochanteric femoral fractures. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses examined the influence of fracture stability, implant type, and patient age. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Fourteen RCTs (n = 4603 patients) were included. No significant differences were found in reoperation rates, union time, implant cut-out, or mortality. IMN was associated with significantly reduced operative time (MD = −5.18 min), fluoroscopy time (MD = −32.92 s), and perioperative blood loss (MD = −111.68 mL). It also had a lower risk of deep infection. Functional outcomes and anatomical results were comparable. Subgroup analyses revealed fracture stability and nail type significantly modified operative time, and compression screws were associated with higher reoperation rates than IMN. Conclusions: For trochanteric femoral fractures, IMN and PF yield comparable results for most clinical outcomes, with IMN offering some advantages in surgical efficiency and perioperative morbidity, though functional outcomes were comparable. Implant selection and fracture stability influence outcomes, supporting individualized surgical decision making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 263 KiB  
Article
Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration on the Incidence of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Elective Colorectal Surgery
by Vladimir Nikolic, Ljiljana Markovic-Denic, Boris Tadić, Milan Veselinović, Ivan Palibrk, Milorad Reljić, Predrag Sabljak, Lidija Masic, Svetozar Mijuskovic, Stefan Kmezic, Djordje Knezevic, Slavenko Ostojić, Jelena Đokić-Kovač and Andrija Antic
Antibiotics 2025, 14(8), 791; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080791 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 154
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influences the incidence of HAIs in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 278 adult [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influences the incidence of HAIs in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 278 adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery at a single tertiary care center. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis: one day or more than one day. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, and infection outcomes were collected. Results: The overall incidence of HAIs was 16.9%, with no significant difference between patients receiving one-day versus extended antibiotic prophylaxis. However, traditional multivariate analysis showed that prophylaxis lasting more than one day was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of HAI (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12–0.75, p = 0.010) and surgical site infections (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.72, p = 0.011). After adjusting for confounders using propensity score matching, this association was no longer statistically significant. No significant association was found between prophylaxis duration and urinary tract infections. Regarding antibiotic selection, first-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used agents, accounting for 78.8% of prophylactic prescriptions. This was followed by fluoroquinolones (14.4%) and third-generation cephalosporins (5.0%). All patients received metronidazole, a nitroimidazole-class antimicrobial, in combination with the above agents. Conclusions: One day of prophylactic antibiotics may be sufficient in SSI prevention in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The use of extended antibiotic prophylaxis beyond one day should be considered for high-risk patients at high risk of infection, particularly those requiring ICU care. Full article
22 pages, 1078 KiB  
Review
The Cannabinoid Pharmacology of Bone Healing: Developments in Fusion Medicine
by Gabriel Urreola, Michael Le, Alan Harris, Jose A. Castillo, Augustine M. Saiz, Hania Shahzad, Allan R. Martin, Kee D. Kim, Safdar Khan and Richard Price
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1891; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081891 - 3 Aug 2025
Viewed by 404
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cannabinoid use is rising among patients undergoing spinal fusion, yet its influence on bone healing is poorly defined. The endocannabinoid system (ECS)—through cannabinoid receptors 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2)—modulates skeletal metabolism. We reviewed preclinical, mechanistic and clinical evidence to clarify how individual [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cannabinoid use is rising among patients undergoing spinal fusion, yet its influence on bone healing is poorly defined. The endocannabinoid system (ECS)—through cannabinoid receptors 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2)—modulates skeletal metabolism. We reviewed preclinical, mechanistic and clinical evidence to clarify how individual cannabinoids affect fracture repair and spinal arthrodesis. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 May 2025 with the terms “cannabinoid”, “CB1”, “CB2”, “spinal fusion”, “fracture”, “osteoblast” and “osteoclast”. Animal studies, in vitro experiments and clinical reports that reported bone outcomes were eligible. Results: CB2 signaling was uniformly osteogenic. CB2-knockout mice developed high-turnover osteoporosis, whereas CB2 agonists (HU-308, JWH-133, HU-433, JWH-015) restored trabecular volume, enhanced osteoblast activity and strengthened fracture callus. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid with CB2 bias, accelerated early posterolateral fusion in rats and reduced the RANKL/OPG ratio without compromising final union. In contrast, sustained or high-dose Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) activation of CB1 slowed chondrocyte hypertrophy, decreased mesenchymal-stromal-cell mineralization and correlated clinically with 6–10% lower bone-mineral density and a 1.8–3.6-fold higher pseudarthrosis or revision risk. Short-course or low-dose THC appeared skeletal neutral. Responses varied with sex, age and genetic background; no prospective trials defined safe perioperative dosing thresholds. Conclusions: CB2 activation and CBD consistently favor bone repair, whereas chronic high-THC exposure poses a modifiable risk for nonunion in spine surgery. Prospective, receptor-specific trials stratified by THC/CBD ratio, patient sex and ECS genotype are needed to establish evidence-based cannabinoid use in spinal fusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Cannabis, Cannabinoids and Its Derivatives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 909 KiB  
Article
Impact of Preoperative Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization on Patients Undergoing Right or Extended Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Andrea P. Fontana, Nadia Russolillo, Ludovica Maurino, Andrea Marengo, Amedeo Calvo, Andrea Ricotti, Serena Langella, Roberto Lo Tesoriere and Alessandro Ferrero
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152556 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 425
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Preoperative strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring major hepatectomy remain controversial, particularly in “borderline resectable” cases. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological benefit and perioperative safety of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients undergoing right or extended right [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Preoperative strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring major hepatectomy remain controversial, particularly in “borderline resectable” cases. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological benefit and perioperative safety of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients undergoing right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC. Material and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC at a single tertiary center between January 2013 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received preoperative TARE or underwent upfront resection. Outcomes analyzed included perioperative morbidity and long-term oncological endpoints. Results: A total of 39 patients were included, of whom 18 received preoperative TARE and 21 underwent upfront surgery. Patients in the TARE group showed significantly greater tumor necrosis at pathology (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.002) and more frequent extended resections. Five-year cancer-specific survival (80.4% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.011), recurrence-free survival (33.8% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.047), and curative-intent disease-free survival (69.3% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.0037) were significantly higher in the TARE group. Overall survival showed a favorable trend. Intraoperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and 90-day mortality were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Preoperative TARE is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy in selected patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy. It may enhance long-term oncological outcomes without increasing surgical risk, supporting its potential role in the management of borderline resectable HCC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1935 KiB  
Article
Segmental Renal Infarction Associated with Accessory Renal Arteries After Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Malignancies
by Ayumi Kozai, Shintaro Yanazume, Fumitaka Ejima, Shuichi Tatarano, Yusuke Kobayashi, Rintaro Kubo, Shinichi Togami, Takashi Yoshiura and Hiroaki Kobayashi
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1395; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081395 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 158
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The causes and clinical outcomes of renal perfusion abnormalities occurring after para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PANDx) for gynecologic malignancies are unknown. We investigated the potential involvement of accessory renal artery (ARA) obstruction in their development by reassessing perioperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The causes and clinical outcomes of renal perfusion abnormalities occurring after para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PANDx) for gynecologic malignancies are unknown. We investigated the potential involvement of accessory renal artery (ARA) obstruction in their development by reassessing perioperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study investigated a clinical database to identify urinary contrast defects using CECT in all patients who had undergone PANDx between January 2020 and December 2024. The perfusion defects in the kidney detected by CECT were extracted by a gynecologic oncologist and evaluated by a radiologist and urologist for suspected obstruction of ARAs. Results: Postoperative renal contrast defects were observed in 3.8% (6/157) of patients. Renal parenchymal fibrosis, cortical atrophy, and parenchymal thinning were observed as universal findings in all patients showing renal contrast defects. In five of the six cases, ARAs supplying the infarcted renal segments were identified on preoperative CECT, and arterial obstruction was confirmed on postoperative imaging. The remaining case was considered to be latent pyelonephritis. All five patients underwent laparotomy, and preoperative CECT failed to detect ARAs. The median resected para-aortic lymph node was 23 nodes (range: 15–33) in five patients, showing no statistically significant difference compared to patients without perfusion abnormalities (p = 0.19). Postoperative serum creatinine levels remained stable. Conclusions: ARA obstruction appears to be a risk factor for segmental renal infarction after para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological malignancies; however, the clinical impact on urinary function may be limited. Awareness of this potential complication is essential for gynecologic oncologists performing PANDx. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 299 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Large Language Model Guidance for Patients on Breast Cancer Surgery Preparation and Recovery
by Elena Palmarin, Stefania Lando, Alberto Marchet, Tania Saibene, Silvia Michieletto, Matteo Cagol, Francesco Milardi, Dario Gregori and Giulia Lorenzoni
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5411; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155411 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 232
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accurate and accessible perioperative health information empowers patients and enhances recovery outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their potential in health communication. This study evaluates the accuracy and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT to questions commonly [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Accurate and accessible perioperative health information empowers patients and enhances recovery outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their potential in health communication. This study evaluates the accuracy and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT to questions commonly asked about breast cancer. Methods: Fifteen simulated patient queries about breast cancer surgery preparation and recovery were prepared. Responses generated by ChatGPT (4o version) were evaluated for accuracy by a pool of breast surgeons using a 4-point Likert scale. Readability was assessed with the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Results: Of the 15 responses evaluated, 11 were rated as “accurate and comprehensive”, while 4 out of 15 were deemed “correct but incomplete”. No responses were classified as “partially incorrect” or “completely incorrect”. The median FKGL score was 11.2, indicating a high school reading level. While most responses were technically accurate, the complexity of language exceeded the recommended readability levels for patient-directed materials. Conclusions: The model shows potential as a complementary resource for patient education in breast cancer surgery, but should not replace direct interaction with healthcare providers. Future research should focus on enhancing language models’ ability to generate accessible and patient-friendly content. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 501 KiB  
Article
Nurse-Led Binaural Beat Intervention for Anxiety Reduction in Pterygium Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Punchiga Ratanalerdnawee, Mart Maiprasert, Jakkrit Klaphajone, Pongsiri Khunngam and Phawit Norchai
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080282 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 254
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anxiety before ophthalmic surgery under local anesthesia may hinder patient cooperation and surgical outcomes. Nurse-led auditory interventions offer a promising non-pharmacological approach to perioperative anxiety management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of superimposed binaural beats (SBBs)—classical music layered with frequency differentials—in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anxiety before ophthalmic surgery under local anesthesia may hinder patient cooperation and surgical outcomes. Nurse-led auditory interventions offer a promising non-pharmacological approach to perioperative anxiety management. This study evaluated the effectiveness of superimposed binaural beats (SBBs)—classical music layered with frequency differentials—in reducing anxiety during pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografting. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 111 adult patients scheduled for elective pterygium excision with conjunctival autografting under local anesthesia were allocated to one of three groups: SBBs, plain music (PM), or silence (control). A trained perioperative nurse administered all auditory interventions. The patients’ anxiety was assessed using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory—State (STAI-S), and physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) were recorded before and after surgery. Results: The SBB group showed significantly greater reductions in their STAI-S scores (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.011), heart rate (p = 0.003), and respiratory rate (p = 0.009) compared to the PM and control groups. No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: SBBs are a safe, nurse-delivered auditory intervention that significantly reduces perioperative anxiety and supports physiological stability. Their integration into routine nursing care for minor ophthalmic surgeries is both feasible and beneficial. Trial Registration: This study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) under registration number TCTR20250125002 on 25 January 2025. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health Nursing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 738 KiB  
Review
A Rationale for the Use of Ivabradine in the Perioperative Phase of Cardiac Surgery: A Review
by Christos E. Ballas, Christos S. Katsouras, Konstantinos C. Siaravas, Ioannis Tzourtzos, Amalia I. Moula and Christos Alexiou
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(8), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12080294 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 524
Abstract
This review explores the advantages of ivabradine in the management of cardiac surgery patients, particularly highlighting its heart rate (HR)-reducing properties, its role in minimizing the impact of atrial fibrillation, and its contributions to improving left ventricular diastolic function, as well as reducing [...] Read more.
This review explores the advantages of ivabradine in the management of cardiac surgery patients, particularly highlighting its heart rate (HR)-reducing properties, its role in minimizing the impact of atrial fibrillation, and its contributions to improving left ventricular diastolic function, as well as reducing pain, stress, and anxiety. In parallel, studies provide evidence that ivabradine influences endothelial inflammatory responses through mechanisms such as biomechanical modulation. Unlike traditional beta-blockers that may induce hypotension, ivabradine selectively inhibits hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, allowing for effective HR reduction without compromising blood pressure stability. This characteristic is particularly beneficial for patients at risk of atrial fibrillation post-surgery, where HR control is crucial for cardiovascular stability. This is an area in which ivabradine appears to play a role prophylactically, possibly in combination with beta-blockers. Furthermore, ivabradine has been associated with enhanced diastolic parameters in left ventricular function, reflecting its potential to improve surgical outcomes in patients with compromised heart function. In addition to its cardiovascular benefits, it appears to alleviate psychological stress and anxiety, common in postoperative settings, by moderating the neuroendocrine response to stress, thereby reducing stress-induced hormone levels. Furthermore, it has notable analgesic properties, contributing to pain management through its action on HCN channels in both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Collectively, these findings indicate that ivabradine may serve as a valuable therapeutic agent in the perioperative care of cardiac surgery patients, addressing both physiological and psychological challenges during recovery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Efficient Implementation of a Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Program in a Naïve Centre Experienced in Open Radical Cystectomy and Other Robot-Assisted Surgeries: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications
by Gianluca Giannarini, Gioacchino De Giorgi, Maria Abbinante, Carmine Franzese, Jeanlou Collavino, Fabio Traunero, Marco Buttazzi, Antonio Amodeo, Angelo Porreca and Alessandro Crestani
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2532; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152532 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 268
Abstract
Background/Objectives: While robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has shown potential benefits over open radical cystectomy (ORC), such as reduced blood loss and quicker recovery, its adoption has been limited because of its complexity and long learning curve, especially for urinary diversion. We assessed whether [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: While robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has shown potential benefits over open radical cystectomy (ORC), such as reduced blood loss and quicker recovery, its adoption has been limited because of its complexity and long learning curve, especially for urinary diversion. We assessed whether a RARC program with fully intracorporeal urinary diversion could be safely implemented in a hospital with no prior experience in RARC, but with expertise in ORC and other robotic surgeries. We also compared perioperative outcomes and complications between RARC and ORC during the implementation phase. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent RARC between June 2023 and January 2025 and 50 patients previously treated with ORC. All RARC cases were performed with intracorporeal urinary diversion. A structured proctoring program guided two surgeons through a stepwise training approach by an expert RARC surgeon. Perioperative outcomes and 90-day complications were compared. Results: All RARC procedures were completed fully intracorporeally with no conversions to open surgery. Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with significantly shorter operative times (for ileal conduit diversion) and hospital stays, lower estimated blood loss, and fewer postoperative complications. There were no differences in intraoperative complications. Worst single grade ≥ 3 complications were significantly less frequent in the RARC than the ORC group (11 [11%] versus 21 [21%], p = 0.045). On multivariable analysis, the robotic approach independently predicted fewer any-grade complications (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.65–0.95, p = 0.01). Conclusions: A RARC program can be safely and effectively implemented in a previously RARC-naïve centre with existing surgical expertise. The robotic approach offers clear perioperative benefits and may represent a favourable alternative to open surgery. Full article
12 pages, 457 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Patients Presenting with Critical Limb Ischemia and Aortic Valve Stenosis
by Luca Attisani, Alessandro Pucci, Matteo A. Pegorer, Luca Luzzani, Francesco Casali, Giorgio Luoni, Stefano Tanagli, Gabriele Piffaretti and Raffaello Bellosta
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(8), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12080292 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 240
Abstract
(1) Background: Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis and those with mild or no aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical revascularization for critical limb threating ischemia (CLTI). (2) Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical lower [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis and those with mild or no aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical revascularization for critical limb threating ischemia (CLTI). (2) Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical lower limb revascularization with femoro-distal bypass for critical ischemia between 2016 and 2022. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by echocardiographic examination and divided into two cohorts: group A with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis (AVA-cm2 < or =1.5 cm2) and group B with mild or absent stenosis (AVA-cm2 > 1.5 cm2). Primary outcomes were major limb amputation and mortality between the two groups. The rate of major cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) and change in “preoperative functional status” were the secondary outcomes. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were performed by calculating means, standard deviation (SD) medians, and interquartile range (IQR) while, for categorical variables, frequencies and percentages were performed. Intergroup comparison tests, for continuous variables, were performed by t-test or corresponding nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney test) while, for categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. Evaluation of cut-offs for the variable AVA-fx-cm2, in terms of predictive of outcome outcomes, was calculated by ROC curves. Comparison between clinical and outcome variables was performed using logistic regression models. A total of 316 patients were analyzed and divided in two groups: 50 (16%) patients with moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis (group A) and 266 (84%) with no or mild aortic valve stenosis (AVA > 1.5 cm2). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (78 years vs. 74 years, p value = 0.005); no other significant comorbidity differences were found between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 1178 days (SD 991 days; 2–3869 days). There were no statistically significant differences between group A and group B in terms of major amputation rate (20% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.895) and overall mortality (48.0% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.640). In the total cohort, the statistically significant variables associated with the major amputation were systemic perioperative complication (OR 5.83, 95% CI: 2.36, 14.57, p < 0.001), bypass-related complication within 30 days of surgery (OR 2.74, 95% CI: 1.17, 6.45, p = 0.020), surgical revascularization below the knee (OR 7.72, 95% CI: 1.53, 140.68, p = 0.049), and the presence of a previous cardiovascular event (OR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.14, 6.26, p = 0.024). In patients undergoing surgical revascularization for CLTI, no significant difference in major amputation rate and overall mortality was found between subjects with mild or no aortic valve stenosis and those with moderate/severe stenosis. As expected, overall mortality was higher in older patients with worse functional status. A significantly higher rate of limb amputation was found in those subjects undergoing subgenicular revascularization, early bypass failure, or previous cardiovascular event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2363 KiB  
Review
Colonic Ischemia Following Major Vascular Surgery: A Literature Review on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Preventive Strategies
by Federica Ruggiero, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Elisa Romano and Pasqualino Sirignano
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8482; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158482 (registering DOI) - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 185
Abstract
Colonic ischemia (CI) is a serious and potentially fatal complication after major abdominal vascular surgery. This literature review explores the pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostic methods, and preventive strategies associated with CI, emphasizing the differences between emergency and elective treatments. Early diagnosis through clinical [...] Read more.
Colonic ischemia (CI) is a serious and potentially fatal complication after major abdominal vascular surgery. This literature review explores the pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostic methods, and preventive strategies associated with CI, emphasizing the differences between emergency and elective treatments. Early diagnosis through clinical signs and instrumental diagnostics, such as sigmoidoscopy and computed tomography, is crucial. Preventive measures, including preoperative evaluation and perioperative management, are emphasized to reduce the incidence of CI. The results of different studies suggest that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), both emergency and elective, has lower risks of ischemic complications than open surgical repair (OSR), as well as better survival for patients. Further research and standardized clinical guidelines are needed to improve patient outcomes and minimize CI severity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2048 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound-Guided PECS II Block Reduces Periprocedural Pain in Cardiac Device Implantation: A Prospective Controlled Study
by Mihaela Butiulca, Florin Stoica Buracinschi and Alexandra Lazar
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081389 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 236
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly performed in elderly and comorbid patients, for whom minimizing perioperative complications—including pain and systemic drug use—is critical. Traditional local infiltration often provides insufficient analgesia. The ultrasound-guided PECS II block, an [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly performed in elderly and comorbid patients, for whom minimizing perioperative complications—including pain and systemic drug use—is critical. Traditional local infiltration often provides insufficient analgesia. The ultrasound-guided PECS II block, an interfascial regional technique, offers promising analgesic benefits in thoracic wall procedures but remains underutilized in cardiac electrophysiology. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, controlled, non-randomized clinical study including 106 patients undergoing de novo CIED implantation. Patients were assigned to receive either a PECS II block (n = 53) or standard lidocaine-based local anesthesia (n = 53). Pain intensity was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) intraoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia, procedural duration, length of hospitalization, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients in the PECS II group reported significantly lower NRS scores at all time points (mean intraoperative score: 2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 5.7 ± 1.6, p < 0.001; at 1 h: 2.5 ± 1.5 vs. 6.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Rescue analgesia (metamizole sodium) was required in only four PECS II patients (7.5%) vs. 100% in the control group within 1 h. Hospital stay and procedural time were also modestly reduced in the PECS II group. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group. Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided PECS II block significantly reduces perioperative pain and the need for additional analgesia during CIED implantation, offering an effective, safe, and opioid-sparing alternative to conventional local infiltration. Its integration into clinical protocols for device implantation may enhance procedural comfort and recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regional and Local Anesthesia for Enhancing Recovery After Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop