Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = percutaneous posterior spinal stabilization

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 9407 KB  
Article
Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Lateral Mini-Open Upper Lumbar Corpectomy with Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Technical Note with Illustrative Case Series
by Harshvardhan G. Iyer, Juan P. Navarro-Garcia de Llano, Elaina J. Wang, Walter R. Johnson, Rahul A. Sastry, Rafael de La Garza Ramos, Prakash Sampath, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Adetokunbo A. Oyelese and Oluwaseun O. Akinduro
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 3501; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073501 - 3 Apr 2026
Viewed by 473
Abstract
Management of unstable upper lumbar fractures with corpectomy and posterior fixation is technically demanding, and conventional workflows may require intraoperative repositioning, increasing operative complexity. Lateral mini-open upper lumbar corpectomy (LMULC) paired with robotic-assisted (RA) posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPPSF) can be performed [...] Read more.
Management of unstable upper lumbar fractures with corpectomy and posterior fixation is technically demanding, and conventional workflows may require intraoperative repositioning, increasing operative complexity. Lateral mini-open upper lumbar corpectomy (LMULC) paired with robotic-assisted (RA) posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPPSF) can be performed in a single position to facilitate ventral spinal decompression and stabilization in the anatomically constrained upper lumbar spine. In this study, we describe the operative technique and report four illustrative cases of unstable L1 or L2 fractures treated with single-position LMULC, RA-PPPSF, and short-segment fusion. Clinical, radiological, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The mean age was 52.3 ± 17.7 years. The median operation time was 314 min (range 268–361 min); the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 225 mL (range 100–400 mL). The median preoperative kyphosis was 10.15° (range 8.4–14.6°), the median postoperative kyphosis measured 6.65° (range 1.7–10.8°) and the median correction achieved was 3.5° (range −2.4–12.9°). The median visual analog scale (VAS) pain score reduced from 7 (range 7–9) preoperatively to 4.5 (range 2–6) postoperatively at discharge. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 6–15 months), all patients had uncomplicated recoveries, demonstrated solid fusion on imaging, and reported favorable MacNab outcomes. Single-position LMULC with RA-PPPSF was technically feasible in this preliminary illustrative series and resulted in favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, further studies in larger cohorts are warranted to help confirm these findings and better define the potential advantages and limitations of this technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Robot-Assisted Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 18972 KB  
Case Report
Progressive Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis in a Young Male: Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Insights
by Dana-Georgiana Nedelea, Diana Elena Vulpe, George Viscopoleanu, Alexandru Constantin Radulescu, Alexandra Ana Mihailescu, Sebastian Gradinaru, Mihnea Orghidan, Cristian Scheau, Romica Cergan and Serban Dragosloveanu
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2024, 16(5), 1005-1016; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16050080 - 12 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2368
Abstract
Objective: We present the case of a 26-year-old male with severe spinal tuberculosis of the thoracolumbar region. The patient suffered from worsening back pain over five years, initially responding to over-the-counter analgesics. Despite being proposed surgery in 2019, the patient refused the intervention [...] Read more.
Objective: We present the case of a 26-year-old male with severe spinal tuberculosis of the thoracolumbar region. The patient suffered from worsening back pain over five years, initially responding to over-the-counter analgesics. Despite being proposed surgery in 2019, the patient refused the intervention and subsequently experienced significant disease progression. Methods: Upon re-presentation in 2022, mild involvement of the T12-L1 vertebrae was recorded by imaging, leading to a percutaneous needle biopsy which confirmed tuberculosis. Despite undergoing anti-tuberculous therapy for one year, the follow-up in 2024 revealed extensive infection from T10 to S1, with large psoas abscesses and a pseudo-tumoral mass of the right thigh. The patient was ultimately submitted to a two-stage surgical intervention: anterior resection and reconstruction of T11-L1 with an expandable cage, followed by posterior stabilization from T8-S1. Results: Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with significant pain relief and no neurological deficits. The patient was discharged on a continued anti-tuberculous regimen and remains under close surveillance. Conclusions: This paper presents details on the challenges of diagnosis and management of severe spinal tuberculosis, with emphasis on the importance of timely intervention and multidisciplinary care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Infections: Epidemiology, Diagnostics, Clinics and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2351 KB  
Review
Management of Spinal Metastasis by Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques: Surgical Principles and Indications—A Literature Review
by Mikael Meyer, Kaissar Farah, Toquart Aurélie, Thomas Graillon, Henry Dufour and Stephane Fuentes
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5165; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165165 - 8 Aug 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3623
Abstract
Background: Spinal metastasis is becoming more frequent. This raises the topics of pain and neurological complications, which worsen the functional and survival prognosis of oncological population patients. Surgical treatment must be as complete as possible in order to decompress and stabilize without delaying [...] Read more.
Background: Spinal metastasis is becoming more frequent. This raises the topics of pain and neurological complications, which worsen the functional and survival prognosis of oncological population patients. Surgical treatment must be as complete as possible in order to decompress and stabilize without delaying the management of the oncological disease. Minimally invasive spine surgical techniques inflict less damage on the musculocutaneous plan than opened ones. Methods: Different minimally invasive techniques are proposed in this paper for the management of spinal metastasis. We used our experience, developed degenerative and traumatic pathologies, and referred to many authors, establishing a narrative review of our local practice. Results: Forty-eight articles were selected, and these allowed us to describe the different techniques: percutaneous methods such as vertebro/kyphoplasty, osteosynthesis, mini-open surgery, or that through a posterior or anterior approach. Also, some studies detail the contribution of new technologies, such as intraoperative CT scan and robotic assistance. Conclusions: It seems essential to offer a lasting solution to a spinal problem, such as in the form of pain relief, stabilization, and decompression. Our department has embraced a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to MISS, incorporating cutting-edge technologies and evidence-based practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Developments in Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3658 KB  
Article
Assessment of Spinal Stability after Discectomy Followed by Annulus Fibrosus Repair and Augmentation of the Nucleus Pulposus: A Finite Element Study
by Chang-Jung Chiang, Yueh-Ying Hsieh, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Yueh-Feng Chiang and Lien-Chen Wu
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 11906; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311906 - 22 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3434
Abstract
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition which can lead to back pain. Although surgical treatments for LDH are well established, complications such as spinal instability and narrowing of adjacent facet joints are still frequently reported. The purpose of this study was [...] Read more.
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition which can lead to back pain. Although surgical treatments for LDH are well established, complications such as spinal instability and narrowing of adjacent facet joints are still frequently reported. The purpose of this study was to use finite element models to evaluate the stability of the L3–L4 segment after conservative or aggressive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) with and without an artificial material filler to correct LDH. Compared to the intact model, aggressive PTED reduced the stability of the segment (increased ROM) and narrowed the space between facet joints in the medial/lateral (ML) direction during flexion (maximum 6.7 degrees change in ROM and 90.5% spacing between facet joints), extension (maximum 2.1 degrees and 38.6%), and axial rotation (maximum 4.2 degrees and 90.1%). Aggressive PTED had a similar effect in the anterior/posterior (AP) direction during lateral bending (maximum 2.0 degrees and 44.2%). Augmenting the nucleus pulposus with a polyurethane filler after aggressive PTED improved spinal stability in both the ML and AP directions in all simulated motions, with results similar to the intact model. However, using a hydrogel filler did little to stabilize the spine, likely because the material is too soft to support the heavy, sustained loading. In conclusion, this study found that if an aggressive discectomy is required, augmenting the nucleus pulposus with a PU filler provides sufficient support to stabilize the spine, while hydrogel fillers offer little support. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Orthopedic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 881 KB  
Article
Risk Factors for Postoperative Loss of Correction in Thoracolumbar Injuries Caused by High-Energy Trauma Treated via Percutaneous Posterior Stabilization without Bone Fusion
by Ryosuke Hirota, Atsushi Teramoto, Hideto Irifune, Mitsunori Yoshimoto, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Mitsumasa Chiba, Noriyuki Iesato, Kousuke Iba, Makoto Emori and Toshihiko Yamashita
Medicina 2022, 58(5), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58050583 - 24 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3017
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous pedicle screws were first introduced in 2001, soon becoming the cornerstone of minimally invasive spinal stabilization. Use of the procedure allowed adequate reduction and stabilization of spinal injuries, even in severely injured patients. This decreased bleeding and shortened [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous pedicle screws were first introduced in 2001, soon becoming the cornerstone of minimally invasive spinal stabilization. Use of the procedure allowed adequate reduction and stabilization of spinal injuries, even in severely injured patients. This decreased bleeding and shortened surgical time, thereby optimizing outcomes; however, postoperative correction loss and kyphosis still occurred in some cases. Thus, we investigated cases of percutaneous posterior fixation for thoracolumbar injury and examined the factors affecting the loss of correction. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients who had undergone percutaneous posterior fixation for thoracolumbar injury (AO classifications A3, A4, B, and C) between 2009 and 2016 were included. Patients with a local kyphosis angle difference ≥10° on computed tomography at the postoperative follow-up (over 12 months after surgery) or those requiring additional surgery for interbody fusion were included in the correction loss group (n = 23); the no-loss group (n = 44) served as the control. The degree of injury (injury level, AO classification, load-sharing score, local kyphosis angle, cuneiform deformity angle, and cranial and caudal disc injury) and surgical content (number of fixed intervertebral vertebrae, type of screw used, presence/absence of screw insertion into the injured vertebrae, and presence/absence of vertebral formation) were evaluated as factors of correctional loss and compared between the two groups. Results: Comparison between each group revealed that differences in the wedge-shaped deformation angle, load-sharing score, degree of cranial disc damage, AO classification at the time of injury, and use of polyaxial screws were statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that the differences in wedge-shaped deformation angle, AO classification, and cranial disc injury were statistically significant; no other factors with statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Correction loss was seen in cases with damage to the cranial intervertebral disc as well as the vertebral body. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4793 KB  
Article
A New Treatment Algorithm That Incorporates Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines: The Results of Its Clinical Application to a Series of 34 Patients
by Yoichi Tani, Takanori Saito, Shinichiro Taniguchi, Masayuki Ishihara, Masaaki Paku, Takashi Adachi, Muneharu Ando and Yoshihisa Kotani
Medicina 2022, 58(4), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040478 - 25 Mar 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4886
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Spinal minimally invasive surgery (MIS) experts at the university hospital worked as a team to develop a new treatment algorithm for pyogenic spondylodiscitis in lumbar and thoracic spines. They modified a flow chart introduced for this condition in a pre-MIS [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Spinal minimally invasive surgery (MIS) experts at the university hospital worked as a team to develop a new treatment algorithm for pyogenic spondylodiscitis in lumbar and thoracic spines. They modified a flow chart introduced for this condition in a pre-MIS era to incorporate MIS techniques based on their extensive experiences accumulated over the years, both in MIS for degenerative lumbar diseases and in the treatment of spine infections. The MIS procedures incorporated in this algorithm consisted of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS)–rod fixation and transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). The current study analyzed a series of 34 patients treated with prospective selection of the methods according to this new algorithm. Materials and Methods: The algorithm first divided the patients into those who had escaped complicated disease conditions, such as neurologic impairment, extensive bone destruction, and the need to be mobilized without delay (Group 1) (19), and those with complicated pyogenic spondylodiscitis (Group 2) (15). Group 1 had image-guided needle biopsy followed by conservative treatment alone with antibiotics and a spinal brace (12) (Group 1-A) or a subsequent addition of non-fused PPS–rod fixation (7) (Group 1-B). Group 2 underwent an immediate single-stage MIS with non-fused PPS–rod fixation followed by posterior exposure for decompression and debridement through a small midline incision (12) (Group 2-A) or an additional LLIF procedure after an interval of 3 weeks (3) (Group 2-B). Results: All patients, except four, who either died from causes unrelated to the spondylodiscitis (2) or became lost to follow up (2), were cured of infection with normalized CRP at an average follow up of 606 days (105–1522 days). A solid interbody fusion occurred at the affected vertebrae in 15 patients (50%). Of the patients in Group 2, all but two regained a nearly normal function. Despite concerns about non-fused PPS–rod instrumentation, only seven patients (21%) required implant removal or replacement. Conclusions: Non-fused PPS–rod placements into infection-free vertebrae alone or in combination with posterior debridement through a small incision worked effectively in providing local stabilization without contamination of the metal implant from the infected tissue. MIS LLIF allowed for direct access to the infected focus for bone grafting in cases of extensive vertebral body destruction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2361 KB  
Brief Report
10-Year Clinical, Functional, and X-ray Follow-Up Evaluation of a Novel Posterior Percutaneous Screw-Rod Instrumentation Technique for Single-Level Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis
by Enrico Pola, Luigi Aurelio Nasto, Valerio Cipolloni, Debora Colangelo, Antonio Leone and Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6(3), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6030159 - 1 Sep 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3435
Abstract
Medical treatment with antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS). Nevertheless, orthopaedic treatment is also very important in relieving pain, preventing neurological damage, and avoiding development of spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, kyphosis) due to spinal instability. Rigid thoracolumbosacral orthosis [...] Read more.
Medical treatment with antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS). Nevertheless, orthopaedic treatment is also very important in relieving pain, preventing neurological damage, and avoiding development of spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, kyphosis) due to spinal instability. Rigid thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) bracing is often needed in patients with PS, and average duration of treatment of 3 to 4 months. However, TLSO bracing can be poorly tolerated and limit ability of the patient to go back to a normal life. In 2004 our group developed an alternative surgical treatment to TLSO bracing by percutaneous posterior screw-rod bridge instrumentation of the infected level. This treatment allows early and free mobilization of the patients and is associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores and improved quality of life as previously reported. Herein, we report the clinical outcome of the first 3 patients who have completed the 10 years follow-up mark after the procedure. A case report is also described and details of the procedure are provided. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop