Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = orthodontic thermoplastic retainers

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 303 KiB  
Review
Cytotoxicity and Endocrine Disruption in Materials Used for Removable Orthodontic Retainers: A Comprehensive Review
by Katarzyna Chojnacka and Marcin Mikulewicz
Dent. J. 2025, 13(6), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13060269 - 17 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 756
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the cytotoxicity and endocrine-disrupting potential of materials used in removable orthodontic retainers. Methods: A literature search (2015–2025) covered in vitro cytotoxicity, estrogenicity, in vivo tissue responses, and clinical biomarkers in PMMA plates, thermoplastic foils, 3D-printed resins, PEEK, and fiber-reinforced composites. [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the cytotoxicity and endocrine-disrupting potential of materials used in removable orthodontic retainers. Methods: A literature search (2015–2025) covered in vitro cytotoxicity, estrogenicity, in vivo tissue responses, and clinical biomarkers in PMMA plates, thermoplastic foils, 3D-printed resins, PEEK, and fiber-reinforced composites. Results: Thirty-eight in vitro and ten clinical studies met inclusion criteria, identified via a structured literature search of electronic databases (2015–2025). Photopolymer resins demonstrated the highest cytotoxicity, whereas thermoplastics and PMMA exhibited predominantly mild effects, which diminished further following 24 h water storage. Bisphenol-type compound release was reported, but systemic exposure remained below regulatory limits. No statistically significant mucosal alterations or endocrine-related effects were reported in clinical studies. Conclusions: Retainer materials are generally biocompatible, though data on long-term endocrine effects are limited. Standardized biocompatibility assessment protocols are necessary to enable comparative evaluation across diverse orthodontic materials. Single-use thermoplastics contribute to microplastic release and pose end-of-life management challenges, raising concerns regarding environmental sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Materials Design and Innovative Treatment Approach)
13 pages, 726 KiB  
Review
A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) vs. Standard Materials Used in Orthodontic Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review
by Pyi Phyo Win, Oak Gar Moe, Daniel De-Shing Chen, Tzu-Yu Peng and Johnson Hsin-Chung Cheng
Polymers 2024, 16(9), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16091271 - 2 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2381
Abstract
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), an organic thermoplastic polymer, has gained interest in dentistry due to its excellent mechanical strength, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, the ability to utilize CAD/CAM in the fabrication of PEEK enhances accuracy, reliability, and efficiency while also saving time. Hence, several orthodontic [...] Read more.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), an organic thermoplastic polymer, has gained interest in dentistry due to its excellent mechanical strength, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, the ability to utilize CAD/CAM in the fabrication of PEEK enhances accuracy, reliability, and efficiency while also saving time. Hence, several orthodontic studies have explored the utilization of PEEK in various applications, such as archwires, brackets, fixed lingual retainers, palatal expansion devices, transpalatal arches, Tübingen palatal plates, different types of space maintainers, mini-implant insertion guides, and more. However, a complete systematic review of the available data comparing the performance of PEEK with traditional orthodontic materials has not yet been conducted. Therefore, this systematic review seeks to assess if PEEK material meets the required mechanical criteria to serve as an alternative to conventional orthodontic appliances. To ensure clarity and precision, this review will specifically concentrate on fixed appliances. This systemic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and utilized databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, and Wiley. Searches were restricted to English language articles from January 2013 to February 2024. Keywords such as “Polyetheretherketone” or “PEEK” and “Orthodontic” or “Orthodontic device” or “Orthodontic materials” were employed across all databases. Nine studies were incorporated, covering orthodontic archwires, brackets, and fixed lingual retainers. Based on the reviewed literature, PEEK demonstrates promising potential in orthodontic fixed appliances, offering advantages in force delivery, friction reduction, and aesthetic appeal. Further research is needed to fully explore its capabilities and optimize its application in clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6625 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Water Sorption and Solubility and FTIR Spectroscopy of Thermoplastic Orthodontic Retainer Materials Subjected to Thermoforming and Thermocycling
by Alaa T. Albilali, Bashayer H. Baras and Mohammad A. Aldosari
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(8), 5165; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085165 - 21 Apr 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2600
Abstract
Due to the fact that retainers are often recommended for a lifetime, their endurance and longevity are directly related to the quality of the materials used in their production. Our study examined the water sorption, water solubility, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy [...] Read more.
Due to the fact that retainers are often recommended for a lifetime, their endurance and longevity are directly related to the quality of the materials used in their production. Our study examined the water sorption, water solubility, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of six commercially available thermoplastic retainer materials (Essix Plus, Zendura, Duran Plus, Tru-Tain DX, Imprelon S pd, and Essix ACE). Moreover, this study evaluated the effect of thermoforming and thermocycling on the water sorption and solubility and surface molecular composition of the tested materials. The present study found that the type of retainer material affected water sorption and solubility capabilities. In addition, the aging methods employed significantly affected some retainer materials’ water sorption and solubility. Moreover, the surface molecular composition evaluated by FTIR spectroscopy revealed that most of the evaluated materials had similar FTIR spectra except for Zendura. All materials had a spectrum that resembled polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) while Zendura had a spectrum similar to semi-rigid polyurethane (PU). Only Zendura had relatively unstable surface structural composition evaluated under the effects of (thermoforming and thermocycling) compared to all tested materials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2082 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Different Thermoplastic Orthodontic Retainer Materials after Thermoforming and Thermocycling
by Alaa T. Albilali, Bashayer H. Baras and Mohammad A. Aldosari
Polymers 2023, 15(7), 1610; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071610 - 23 Mar 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5113
Abstract
While the durability of thermoplastic aligners has been the subject of numerous studies, the durability of thermoplastic retainers has received significantly less attention. Patients are often advised to wear their thermoplastic retainers indefinitely, so the durability of the materials used in their fabrication [...] Read more.
While the durability of thermoplastic aligners has been the subject of numerous studies, the durability of thermoplastic retainers has received significantly less attention. Patients are often advised to wear their thermoplastic retainers indefinitely, so the durability of the materials used in their fabrication is crucial to determining whether they are worth the cost. Limited studies have evaluated the properties of thermoplastic retainer materials and the effects of thermocycling on their mechanical properties. Thus, this study aimed to examine six thermoplastic retainer materials after thermoforming with and without thermocycling. The materials’ flexural modulus, hardness, and surface roughness values were measured after thermoforming (Group 1) and after thermoforming with subsequent thermocycling for 10,000 cycles (Group 2). After thermoforming, there was a significant difference in flexural modulus and hardness values between most of the materials. However, their surface roughness was not significantly different (p < 0.05). After thermocycling, the flexural modulus and hardness increased significantly for most tested materials (p < 0.05) compared to Group 1. Concerning the surface roughness, only two materials showed significantly higher values after thermocycling than Group 1. Thus, all the mechanical properties of the evaluated materials differed after thermoforming, except the surface roughness. Moreover, while thermocycling made the materials stiffer and harder in general, it also made some of them rougher. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Analysis and Characterization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1892 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Different Cleaning Protocols on the Surface Roughness of Orthodontic Retainers
by Luka Šimunović, Tadeja Blagec and Senka Meštrović
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1319; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031319 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4550
Abstract
Thermoplastic materials are sensitive to humidity, temperature variations, enzyme activities, and cyclic loading. All these factors can cause changes to the mechanical properties of the material. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different cleaning protocols on the surface [...] Read more.
Thermoplastic materials are sensitive to humidity, temperature variations, enzyme activities, and cyclic loading. All these factors can cause changes to the mechanical properties of the material. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different cleaning protocols on the surface roughness of orthodontic retainers. Samples of two brands of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) material were exposed to four cleaning protocols: Corega (alkaline peroxide tablets), Toothbrush, Corega + toothbrush, Toothbrush + toothpaste, and Control. Measurement of the surface roughness of the sample on both the top and bottom side was carried out before and after cleaning. There was no statistical difference between the final values of the measured parameters. However, looking at the extent of the change in surface roughness, there was a statistically significant difference in the upper side of the Corega + toothbrush group between Materials A and B. This suggests that there was a greater change in the roughness of material A (Erkodur), given that the mean change in roughness of Material A was Ra 0.047, whereas the mean change in roughness of Material B was Ra 0.022. Almost all the tested cleaning procedures significantly increased the surface roughness of the PET-G retainer material. Of all the methods, the Corega tablets had the lowest influence on surface roughness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Applications for Dentistry and Oral Health, 2nd Volume)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1347 KiB  
Review
Antimicrobial Activity of Various Disinfectants to Clean Thermoplastic Polymeric Appliances in Orthodontics
by Kanket Kiatwarawut, Dinesh Rokaya and Irin Sirisoontorn
Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2256; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112256 - 31 May 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4094
Abstract
There is a lack of research evidence on the risk–benefits of the various disinfectants in cleaning products and cleansing regimens. This systematic review compared the antimicrobial activity of various chemical disinfectants to disinfect the thermoplastic polymeric appliances in orthodontics. The study was carried [...] Read more.
There is a lack of research evidence on the risk–benefits of the various disinfectants in cleaning products and cleansing regimens. This systematic review compared the antimicrobial activity of various chemical disinfectants to disinfect the thermoplastic polymeric appliances in orthodontics. The study was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. An electronic search was conducted on Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Springer. Two authors independently investigated the risk of bias in duplication. A total of 225 articles were collected. After removing duplicates, 221 articles remained, and after filtering their titles and abstracts, 11 articles met eligibility qualifications remained. Finally, nine articles that met the criteria were selected. It showed that both over-the-counter orthodontic appliance cleaners and applied-chemical disinfectants were effective against bacteria. The duration and frequency of usage guidelines cannot be concluded. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2770 KiB  
Review
A Review on Current Trends of Polymers in Orthodontics: BPA-Free and Smart Materials
by Rozita Hassan, Muhammad Umar Aslam Khan, Abdul Manaf Abdullah and Saiful Izwan Abd Razak
Polymers 2021, 13(9), 1409; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091409 - 27 Apr 2021
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 7760
Abstract
Polymeric materials have always established an edge over other classes of materials due to their potential applications in various fields of biomedical engineering. Orthodontics is an emerging field in which polymers have attracted the enormous attention of researchers. In particular, thermoplastic materials have [...] Read more.
Polymeric materials have always established an edge over other classes of materials due to their potential applications in various fields of biomedical engineering. Orthodontics is an emerging field in which polymers have attracted the enormous attention of researchers. In particular, thermoplastic materials have a great future utility in orthodontics, both as aligners and as retainer appliances. In recent years, the use of polycarbonate brackets and base monomers bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate (bis-GMA) has been associated with the potential release of bisphenol A (BPA) in the oral environment. BPA is a toxic compound that acts as an endocrine disruptor that can affect human health. Therefore, there is a continuous search for non-BPA materials with satisfactory mechanical properties and an esthetic appearance as an alternative to polycarbonate brackets and conventional bis-GMA compounds. This study aims to review the recent developments of BPA-free monomers in the application of resin dental composites and adhesives. The most promising polymeric smart materials are also discussed for their relevance to future orthodontic applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Composites in Biomedical Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 1315 KiB  
Review
Safety Considerations for Thermoplastic-Type Appliances Used as Orthodontic Aligners or Retainers. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In-Vitro Research
by Anna Iliadi, Despina Koletsi, Spyridon N. Papageorgiou and Theodore Eliades
Materials 2020, 13(8), 1843; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081843 - 14 Apr 2020
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 7558
Abstract
Use of thermoplastic material in orthodontics, either as aligner or as retainer appliances, is common practice and is likely to increase in the years to come. However, no systematic assessment on safety considerations of these adjuncts has been implemented up to date. The [...] Read more.
Use of thermoplastic material in orthodontics, either as aligner or as retainer appliances, is common practice and is likely to increase in the years to come. However, no systematic assessment on safety considerations of these adjuncts has been implemented up to date. The aim of this systematic review was to collectively appraise the existing evidence from both clinical and laboratory studies, on whether these appliances are associated with any estrogenic/cytotoxic effects or bisphenol-A (BPA) and monomer leaching. Eight electronic databases were searched with no limits in December 22, 2019, for published and unpublished research. Eligibility criteria comprised of studies of any design, describing use of any type of thermoplastic aligner. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment was done independently, either in duplicate or confirmed by a second reviewer. Random effects meta-analyses of weighted mean differences (WMD) with associated 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were planned. Quality of the evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A total of 58 articles were initially identified, while 5 were included in qualitative synthesis and 2 of those contributed to the quantitative syntheses. Four studies were in-vitro, while one was a randomized controlled trial; all assessed some type of orthodontic aligner or retainer, either as-received or retrieved. Risk of bias recordings ranged between unclear and high for all studies. Proliferation induction capacity of thermoplastic appliances’ eluents on MCF-7 cells failed to be confirmed compared to beta-estradiol (2 studies: 5% v/v, WMD: −182.08; 95% CI: −198.83, −165.33; p-value < 0.001; and 20% v/v, WMD: −184.53; 95% CI: −206.17, −162.88; p-value < 0.001). No cytotoxic activity was detected as well. In addition, although evidence from in-vitro studies was indicative of no traceable detection of BPA or other monomers, the findings from a single clinical trial were allied to increased levels of BPA in whole stimulated saliva, after up to 30 days of thermoplastic retainer usage, compared to standard Hawley retainer. The quality of the evidence overall was low to medium. Current data from in-vitro research are indicative of an absence of an estrogenic or cytotoxic effect of thermoplastic aligners or retainers. Regarding BPA or monomer release, evidence from clinical and laboratory studies appear inconsistent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current and Future Trends in Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop