Search Results (57)

Oligometastatic breast cancer represents an intermediate state between localized and disseminated disease with reasonable potential for clinical cure. Advancements in surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy have improved prognosis. Due to the high prevalence of bone metastases, an increasing number of studies are evaluating new treatment strategies for oligometastatic bone disease. The decision to perform skeletal surgery is complex and depends on optimal patient selection. Major criteria include impending or pathologic long bone fractures, severe neurologic compromise, and an expected survival of over 3 months. Factors associated with improved survival include solitary bone metastases, preserved performance status, adequate surgical margins, absence of pathologic fracture, metachronous metastases, and ER-positivity status. Radiotherapy, especially SBRT, offers effective local control and palliation. Interventional radiology techniques such as percutaneous thermal ablation have also been described as potential treatment alternatives, particularly for fragile patients. Systemic treatment varies according to the tumor subtype. For HR+ and HER2 subtypes, a combination of endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors may be considered. HER2+ patients are often treated with HER2-targeted therapies combined with chemotherapy. For triple-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy is the primary treatment. Bone-modifying agents are also recommended to maintain bone strength, prevent skeletal-related events, and reduce the need for additional interventions. Skeletal muscle metastases in breast cancer patients are rare and typically indicate advanced disease with poor prognosis. Treatment options include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical excision, but should be tailored to the patient’s clinical condition and prognosis. Full article

Background/Objectives: Synchronous oligometastasis in stage IVB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) may represent an intermediate state in which local therapy remains effective. However, its definition is still debated, and outcome data are limited. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 191 consecutive patients with ESCC and synchronous oligometastases treated between 2006 and 2022. Oligometastasis was defined as ≤5 distant metastatic lesions. Patients received systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy), local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), or combined systemic and local therapy (surgery following preoperative therapy or chemoradiotherapy). Survival outcomes and prognostic factors were assessed. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 25.1 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 41.0%. Multivariate analysis identified performance status, number of organ metastases, and treatment type as independent prognostic factors. Patients with single-organ metastasis had superior outcomes compared with those with multiple metastases (3-year OS: 44.3% vs. 0%; progression-free survival [PFS]: 23.5% vs. 0%). Combined systemic and local therapy yielded the best outcomes, with 3-year OS and PFS rates of 49.8% and 29.3%, respectively, compared with 20.0% and 18.1% for local therapy and 20.1% and 0% for systemic therapy alone. Conclusions: Patients with multiple-organ metastases have a very poor prognosis, indicating that their metastases may not represent true oligometastases. Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients using multimodal strategies that integrate systemic and local therapies. These findings demonstrate better treatment outcomes for stage IVB ESCC and provide a reference for future developments relating to oligometastatic disease. Full article

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (OMD-NSCLC) has emerged as a biologically and clinically distinct subtype of advanced disease, characterized by limited metastatic burden and a more indolent course. In this narrative review, we examine the current definition of OMD-NSCLC, diagnostic tests, possible biomarkers, and current therapeutic strategies. Biological insights highlight the role of microRNAs in differentiating true oligometastatic state from polymetastatic disease. The main local ablative therapies (LAT) include surgery and radiotherapy. The integration of LAT with systemic therapies has been explored in clinical trials, yielding promising but occasionally inconsistent results. As the therapeutic landscape of OMD-NSCLC patients continues to evolve, refining definitions, identifying predictive biomarkers, and individualizing care are essential steps toward achieving the potential of radical-intent therapy. Full article

Oligometastasis represents a clinically relevant state of limited metastatic disease that could be amenable to selected local therapies in carefully chosen patients. Although initial trials such as SABR-COMET demonstrated a survival benefit with aggressive local treatment, breast cancer was underrepresented. Subsequent breast cancer-specific trials, including NRG-BR002, failed to show a clear survival benefit, highlighting uncertainties and the need for further refinement in patient selection and integration with systemic approaches. The definitions of oligometastasis continue to evolve, incorporating radiological, clinical, and biological features. Advances in imaging and molecular profiling suggest that oligometastatic breast cancer might represent a distinct biological subtype, with potential biomarkers including PIK3CA mutations and YAP/TAZ expression. Organ-specific strategies using stereotactic radiotherapy, surgery, and proton therapy have shown favorable local control in certain settings, though their impact on the overall survival remains under investigation. Emerging techniques, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, are being explored to improve patient selection and disease monitoring. Ongoing trials may provide further insight into the role of local therapy, particularly in hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive subtypes. Local and systemic strategies need to be carefully coordinated to optimize the outcomes. This review summarizes the current definitions of and evidence and therapeutic considerations for oligometastatic breast cancer and outlines potential future directions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of intrafractional variations in adrenal MRgRT is unknown. Methods: A total of 23 patients with 24 adrenal metastases were treated with MRgRT. After daily plan adaptation and before beam application, an additional (preRT) 3d MRI was acquired. PreRT target volumes and OARs were retrospectively recontoured in 200 fractions. The delivered, online-adapted treatment plans, as well as non-adapted baseline plans, were calculated on these re-contoured structures to quantify the dosimetric impact of intrafractional variations on target volume coverage and OAR doses with and without online adaptation. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated. Results: The median time between the two MRIs was 56.4 min. GTV and PTV coverage (dose to 95% of the PTV, D95%, and volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose, V100%) were significantly inferior in the preRT plans. GTV D_mean was significantly impaired in left-sided metastases, but not in right-sided metastases. Compared to non-adapted preRT plans, adapted preRT plans were still significantly superior for all GTV and PTV metrics. Intrafractional violations of OAR constraints were frequent. D0.5cc and the volume exposed to the near-maximum dose constraint were significantly higher in the preRT plans. The volume exposed to the D0.5cc constraints in single fractions escalated up to 1.5 cc for the esophagus, 3.2 cc for the stomach, 5.3 cc for the duodenum and 7.3 cc for the bowel. This led to significantly elevated NTCPs for the stomach, bowel and duodenum. Neither PTV D95%, nor gastrointestinal OAR maximum doses were significantly impaired by longer fraction duration. Conclusions: Intrafractional motion in adrenal MRgRT caused significant impairment of target volume coverage (D95% and V100%), potentially undermining local control. Frequent violation of gastrointestinal OAR constraints led to elevated NTCP. Compared to non-adaptive treatment, online adaptation still highly improved GTV and PTV coverage. Full article

Bone metastases are a major concern in cancer management since they significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. Metastatic lesions, commonly arising from breast, prostate, lung, and kidney cancers, affect approximately 25% of cancer patients, leading to severe complications such as pain, fractures, and neurological deficits. This narrative review explores contemporary approaches to bone metastases, emphasizing a multidisciplinary strategy and the evolving concept of oligometastatic disease. Oligometastases, defined by limited metastatic spread (1–5 lesions), offer a potential window for curative treatment through aggressive interventions, including stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and resection surgery. Tumor boards, integrating systemic therapies with local interventions, are crucial to optimize treatment. Despite promising results, gaps remain in defining optimal treatment sequences and refining patient selection criteria. Future research should focus on personalized approaches, leveraging biomarkers and advanced imaging to enhance outcomes and the quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Full article

Oligoprogressive disease refers to the setting of a prior or ongoing receipt of systemic therapy, with typically up to three metastatic areas having increased in size and/or avidity compared to the start of the systemic therapy. The role of local ablative therapy (LAT) including radiation has mostly been evaluated in the oligometastatic setting with limited data in oligoprogression. A similar principle of using ablative radiation in the oligometastatic setting may be applied to consolidative therapy for oligoprogressive disease. If systemic therapy can control the majority of the disease, and a few areas of therapy-resistant clones continue to proliferate, then potentially controlling those few resistant clones while maintaining systemic control may be beneficial. Doing so may also extend the duration of benefit of the systemic therapy and reserve next systemic line options at a later point, and potentially improve progression free survival (PFS). Here, we review the current data evaluating the role of radiation in oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ongoing trials. Full article

Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) represents an intermediate state in the progression from localized disease to widespread metastasis when the radiographically significant sites are limited in number and location. With no clear consensus on a definition, its diagnostic significance and associated optimal therapeutic approach remain controversial, posing a significant challenge for clinicians. The current standard of care for metastatic disease is to start systemic therapy; however, active surveillance and targeted radiotherapy have become attractive options to mitigate the long-term effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Furthermore, evolving biomarker methodologies may further define optimal treatment selection. In this review, we summarize the current understanding that guides the treatment of OMPC, with a focus on how host response can be an important contributing factor. Evolving scientific understanding and clinical development will continue to shape the landscape of treatment strategies for this distinct disease state. Full article

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of mortality in Canada, with many patients presenting with metastatic disease. The oligometastatic state (OM-NSCLC) may be amenable to cure using aggressive local consolidative therapies. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which entails the utilization of a high dose of radiation in one or few fractions, has many benefits in this setting, including its applicability in varied patient populations to ablate lesions in varied anatomical locations. It has also been demonstrated to prolong the time to next-line systemic therapy, to reduce financial burden, to improve quality-adjusted life years, and reduce adverse events caused by these lesions. This review outlines the published phase II and III trials that have already demonstrated the utility of SBRT in OM-NSCLC, as well as the many ongoing trials aiming to further define its role, including the largest phase II/III trial to date, NRG-LU002. Overall, SBRT appears to improve outcomes when combined with a broad range of standard-of-care therapies and is generally well tolerated; however, careful patient selection is necessary to maximize benefits while minimizing harm. Ongoing trials will help define the optimal patients for SBRT and the best timing for this intervention. Full article

This study aimed to examine the education and training needs of health care practitioners (HCPs) in the Philippines who encounter lung oligometastatic cancer patients. Lung oligometastatic disease is among the most common sites for cancer spread and has the most established practices for treating oligometastases. A modified version of the Hennessy–Hicks Training Needs Assessment Questionnaire was administered online to HCPs working in private and public centers in the Philippines. HCPs were recruited via purposive sampling. Twenty-seven HCPs completed the questionnaire (47% response rate). Respondents were mostly female (59%) and between the ages of 30 and 39 years (70%). Three-quarters (74%) were consultants, and most respondents were radiation oncologists (44%) or medical oncologists (30%). Medical oncologists rated Management/Supervisory Tasks (mean = 1.42) as their highest area of training need while radiation oncologists rated Clinical Tasks (mean = 1.30) as their highest training need. Pulmonologists (mean = 0.60) and other specialists (mean = 1.00) rated Administration tasks as their top area of training need. The clinical task-related category was rated the highest need among the continuing medical education topics. This study provides valuable insights for the implementation and advancement of a comprehensive curriculum in clinical oncology, specifically designed to enhance the administrative, clinical, and research capacities of oncologists who encounter oligometastatic lung disease in the Philippines. Full article

Stereotactic body radiotherapy has been established as a viable treatment option for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer or secondary lesions mainly in oligoprogressive/oligometastatic scenarios. Treating lesions in the so-called “no flight zone” has always been challenging and conflicting data never cleared how to safely treat these lesions. This is truer considering ultra-central lesions, i.e., directly abutting or whose PTV is overlapping critical mediastinal organs. While historical retrospective data are abundant but mostly heterogenous in terms of the definition of ultra-central lesions, dosing regimens and outcomes, prospective data remain scarce, even though recently published studies have given new encouraging results for such delicate treatment scenarios. For this reason, we aimed to review and summarize current knowledge on stereotactic radiation treatment for ultra-central thoracic lesions, highlighting the most recent advances and the messages that can be taken from them. Lastly, we propose a workflow of the necessary steps to identify and treat such patients, therefore helping in elucidating the advantages and caveats of such treatment options. Full article

Background/Objectives: Limited metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPC) lacks clear management guidelines, especially for HPV-associated disease. The objective of this study was to investigate if primary site radiotherapy (RT) benefits overall survival in limited metastatic OPC. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients aged 18–90 with OPC presenting as cM1 with limited metastatic disease to one distant site were identified. Propensity score matching, Cox-proportional hazards models, and Kaplan–Meier estimates were employed to assess factors associated with overall survival. Results: In this study, 1056 patients were included with metastases involving bone (19.0%), brain (0.8%), lung (52.9%), liver (10.1%), and lymph nodes (20.4%). Treatment modalities included 54.6% receiving primary site RT, 45.4% receiving no RT, and 69.9% undergoing systemic therapy. For HPV-positive patients, RT (HR 0.64, p = 0.0026) and receipt of chemotherapy (HR = 0.57, p = 0.0057) were associated with improved overall survival, while bone and lung metastases were associated with decreased survival (HR = 1.75 and 1.39, p = 0.0041 and 0.041, respectively). In HPV-negative cases, survival also correlated with RT (HR = 0.65, p = 0.0047), receipt of chemotherapy (HR = 0.45, p < 0.001), clinical T4 disease (HR = 1.99, p = 0.012), presence of bone metastases (HR = 2.52, p < 0.001), lung metastases (HR = 1.49, p = 0.035), and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 1.10, p < 0.001). Overall, patients who received RT showed increased median overall survival from 9.9 to 16.1 months (p < 0.001) compared to those who did not. When stratified by RT and HPV status, there was higher median survival for both HPV-positive (from 17.1 to 24.9 months, p < 0.001) and HPV-negative patients (from 8.4 to 12.9 months, p = 0.0016) who received RT compared to those who did not. Conclusions: Primary-site radiotherapy may positively impact overall survival in limited metastatic OPC, irrespective of HPV status. Full article

Background/Objectives: Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) represents an early stage of metastatic disease characterized by a limited number of lesions. Recent advancements in imaging and treatment have revived interest in personalized therapies, including metastasis-directed radiotherapy (OMDRT) and primary prostate radiotherapy (PPR). This study evaluates the impact of OMDRT timing and the role of PPR on survival outcomes in OMPC patients; Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 patients with OMPC who underwent OMDRT between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Patients were classified based on OMDRT timing (early vs. late) and disease type (synchronous vs. metachronous). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models; Results: Among the patients, 36 (43.9%) had synchronous and 46 (56.1%) had metachronous OMD. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 77.5% and 88.5%, respectively. Early OMDRT significantly improved PFS (HR 0.461, 95% CI: 0.257–0.826, p = 0.009) and OS (HR 0.219, 95% CI: 0.080–0.603, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis showed the most favorable outcomes for synchronous OMD patients receiving early OMDRT, with a median PFS of 22.2 months and a 5-year survival rate of 42.1%. The treatment of the primary prostate provided a survival benefit in the OS of synchronous OMD patients (5-year 83.1% vs. 50%, p = 0.025), and there was a further improvement in OS after PPR (5-year 87.7% vs. 50%, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Early OMDRT significantly enhances survival outcomes in OMPC, in both synchronous and metachronous cases. The integration of PPR can further improve results, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment strategies. To more definitively clarify our findings across various clinical situations, further studies with larger cohorts or prospective designs are necessary. Full article

The United States Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System has a strong history of conducting impactful oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We developed a phase II/III RCT to test the use of metastasis-directed therapy in Veterans with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC)—the first VA RCT in OMPC that leverages novel imaging and advanced radiotherapy techniques. To accomplish this, we developed a clinical trial network to conduct the study. In this manuscript, we describe several challenges we encountered in study development/conduct and our strategies to address them, with the goal of helping investigators establish robust study networks to conduct clinical trials. In the study start-up, we encountered challenges in timely site activation, and leveraged project management to maximize efficiency. Additionally, there were several changes in the clinical paradigms in imaging and treatment that led to protocol amendments to ensure maximum equipoise, recruitment, and impact of the study. Specifically, we amended the trial to add de novo OMPC patients (from initially only recurrent OMPC) and expanded the study to allow up to 10 metastases (from initially five). Finally, in order to maintain local study team engagement, we developed initiatives to maximize collaboration and add value to the overall clinical program through study participation. Full article

Background: This study investigated the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in managing spinal metastasis. Traditionally, surgery was the primary approach, but SRS has emerged as a promising alternative. Objective: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of spinal metastasis in terms of local tumor control, patient survival, and quality of life, identifying both advantages and limitations of SRS. Methods: Through an extensive literature search in PubMed with cross-referencing, relevant full-text-available papers published between 2012 and 2022 in English or German were included. The search string used was “metastatic spine diseases AND SRS OR stereotactic radiosurgery”. Results: There is growing evidence of SRS as a precise and effective treatment. SRS delivers high radiation doses while minimizing exposure to critical neural structures, offering benefits like pain relief, limited tumor growth, and a low complication rate, even for tumors resistant to traditional radiation therapies. SRS can be a primary treatment for certain metastatic cases, particularly those without spinal cord compression. Conclusions: SRS appears to be a preferable option for oligometastasis and radioresistant lesions, assuming there are no contraindications. Further research is necessary to refine treatment protocols, determine optimal radiation dose and fractionation schemes, and assess the long-term effects of SRS on neural structures. Full article