Search Results (28)

Background and Objectives: Thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia are common but non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, their relationship with specific immunological profiles remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate these hematologic manifestations and identify their serological associations in patients with APS. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 346 patients diagnosed with APS. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with hemolytic anemia. Results: The mean age was 47.1 ± 13.1 years, and 71.7% were female. Thrombocytopenia was present in 34.5%, and hemolytic anemia in 16.5% of patients. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) was the most common antibody (66.8%). In univariate analysis, hemolytic anemia was significantly associated with LAC positivity (OR 4.216, 95% CI: 2.326–7.640, p < 0.001), anticardiolipin IgG (OR 7.170, p = 0.007), triple positivity (OR 3.638, p = 0.002), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.084, p = 0.007). DIAPS showed a protective trend (OR 0.547, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, only LAC remained an independent risk factor for hemolytic anemia (adjusted OR 3.557, 95% CI: 1.355–9.335, p = 0.003). Conclusions: LAC positivity is an independent predictor of hemolytic anemia in APS. These findings suggest a distinct immunologic profile among patients with hematologic involvement and highlight the need for further investigation into non-criteria manifestations. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by venous and arterial thrombosis and obstetric complications, driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs). This review synthesizes the latest advancements and current understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of APS. APLAs, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI), interfere with coagulation and endothelial function, as well as with placental health. APS can be primary or secondary; it is often associated with systemic autoimmune diseases like lupus. The pathogenesis of APS remains only partially understood. APLAs promote thrombosis through endothelial damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory signaling pathways. Laboratory diagnosis relies on persistent positivity for APLAs and LAC through tests like ELISA and clotting assays, following a three-step confirmation process. New integrated test systems have been introduced to improve standardization. Classification criteria have evolved, with the 2023 EULAR-ACR criteria providing a weighted, domain-based scoring system, enhancing diagnostic precision. Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is a severe, rare manifestation of APS, characterized by multi-organ failure due to rapid, widespread microthrombosis and systemic inflammation, which requires urgent anticoagulation. Seronegative APS is proposed for patients with clinical features of APS but negative standard antibody tests, possibly due to non-criteria antibodies or transient immunosuppression. Treatment primarily involves long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists; direct oral anticoagulants are generally not recommended. APS diagnosis and management remain complex due to clinical heterogeneity and laboratory challenges. Continued refinement of diagnostic tools and criteria is essential for improving outcomes in this life-threatening condition. Full article

Background/Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) represents a common ophthalmological disorder that, if untreated, often leads to severely impaired vision. The classic vascular risk factors, aging and glaucoma, represent the core pathogenic factors for RVO. However, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been involved in a non-negligible number of patients with RVO. The main objective of the present study was to assess the performance of the new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS in a cohort of patients with RVO fulfilling the Sydney classification criteria. Methods: A prospective study of consecutive patients with RVO diagnosed with APS in a third-level university hospital. The new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS were applied to all patients. Vascular risk factors, the antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, clinical management, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between those fulfilling the Sydney and the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Results: Sixty-nine RVO-APS patients were included in the study. After applying the new classification criteria, 18 patients (26.1%) did not fulfill the new criteria for APS. Specifically, 17 (24.6%) were excluded due to the new Domain 8 (p < 0.001) as they presented only aPL IgM serology, and 1 patient (1.4%) was excluded due to having high venous thromboembolic risk (VTE) with a clinical domain score < 3. Interestingly enough, the presence of high arterial risk (45.1% vs. 50%; p = 0.72) was greater than the presence of high VTE (3.9% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.99); in both cases, the 51 RVO-APS patients were classified with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, and the 18 cases were excluded according to the new classification criteria. Except for the expected differences in serological domains (Domain 7, p < 0.001, and Domain 8, p < 0.001), we did not find other significant differences in terms of prognosis or risk of recurrence between both groups of patients. Conclusions: The implementation of the new ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria for APS resulted in the exclusion of about one out of four previously diagnosed RVO-APS patients. The higher prevalence of manifestations of high arterial risk compared with high VTE among both newly classified and excluded APS patients highlights the importance of monitoring cardiovascular risk factors for both the prevention and the management of potential retinal and cardiovascular events. Full article

Women with adverse pregnancy outcomes suggestive of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), but not fulfilling clinical and/or laboratory international classification criteria, are increasingly recognized both in clinical practice and in the literature. This entity is termed non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS). It includes clinical scenarios such as two unexplained pregnancy losses, three non-consecutive pregnancy losses, late pre-eclampsia/eclampsia/signs of placental insufficiency, or recurrent implantation failure, as well as positive low-titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and non-classical aPLs. To address the NC-OAPS heterogeneity, a nomenclature proposal was developed. In recent years, retrospective and prospective cohort studies have been designed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of the different subsets of NC-OAPS. In general, the studies support that NC-OAPS may benefit from treatment with antithrombotic, anticoagulant and/or immunomodulator agents, but several considerations must be made on the robustness and nuances of the scientific evidence. The objective of this review is to critically analyze the available evidence supporting the diagnosis of NC-OAPS, categorize its subsets, and evaluate the impact of treatment strategies on its outcome. We also remark on questions that are still unanswered, such as the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatment protocols. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in combination with recurrent thrombosis in the veins and/or arteries, obstetric morbidity, and various non-thrombotic associated complications. APS can be primary, as an isolated condition, or secondary in the context of another autoimmune disease, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. This comprehensive clinical review aims to summarize the current understanding of APS pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for this unique clinical entity. Methods: A comprehensive review of the existing literature on APS was conducted, focusing on pathophysiological mechanisms, current diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic approaches. Results: APS pathogenesis involves complex interactions between aPL, phospholipid-binding proteins, and the coagulation cascade. Apart from the cardinal features of thrombosis and APS-related obstetric morbidity, APS is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Diagnosis remains challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions, and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in order to set the diagnosis. The recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria although not definitive for clinical decision-making, these criteria offer clinicians a valuable tool to aid in determining whether further investigation for APS is warranted. Continued refinement of these criteria through ongoing feedback and updates is anticipated. Treatment strategies center on anticoagulation, but individualized approaches are necessary. Conclusions: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of APS are critical to reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Moreover, familiarization with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria is encouraged, recognizing that ongoing feedback and updates will contribute to their ongoing refinement and improvement. While VKAs remain the mainstay of treatment for most APS patients further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and deepen our understanding of APS’s underlying disease mechanisms. Full article

Background: The clinical and laboratory features of patients with non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS), as well as their pregnancy outcomes and ideal treatment are not clearly determined. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies in NC-OAPS and compare them with an obstetric APS (OAPS) cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on a cohort of women referred to a high-risk obstetric unit of a tertiary hospital. Women that were classified as having OAPS or NC-OAPS were included and compared in terms of clinical and laboratory characteristics, management, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Results: We identified 107 women with 143 pregnancies, 91 with NC-OAPS and 16 with OAPS. There were no differences in demographic features between both groups. Women with NC-OAPS were more likely to have recurrent implantation failure and were predominantly positive for a single antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtype. Both groups were treated similarly (low dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin in 87.4% of NC-OAPS and 83.3% of OAPS, p > 0.05). Live birth rate (82.4% and 75.0%, respectively, p > 0.05) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (31.6% vs. 37.5%, p > 0.05) in subsequent pregnancies during follow-up were also similar between groups. Conclusions: This study revealed differences in the previous pregnancy morbidity and aPL profiles in women with NC-OAPS and OAPS, although the therapeutic approach and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies were similar in both groups. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) testing is critical for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria recommend the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and specific thresholds for aPL positivity. Since non-ELISA methods are increasingly used, we compared and evaluated ELISA and non-ELISA aPL assays in a real-world maximum care hospital setting. Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2024, anticardiolipin (aCL; IgG and IgM) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI; IgG and IgM) antibodies were measured using ELISA (n = 5115) and a chemiluminescence-based automated immunoassay (CLIA) (n = 3820). Results of parallel testing were compared, and associations with clinical and laboratory characteristics were evaluated. Results: A total of 946 samples were tested using ELISA and CLIA in parallel. A total of 136 (14%) specimens were positive for at least one aPL, and 55 (6%) specimens were from patients diagnosed with APS. Among the latter, 47 (85%) and 41 (75%) patients were positive when ELISA- or CLIA-based aPL assays were used, respectively. After applying the >40 units threshold of the new classification criteria, the number of aPL-positive specimens was significantly lower. In the entire cohort, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable only for aß2GPI IgG; the results from the two methods did not agree for aCL IgG/IgM and aß2GPI IgM. In APS patients, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable for aß2GPI IgG and IgM but poor for aCL IgG and IgM. Antibody levels in APS patients were significantly higher using CLIA compared to ELISA. Conclusions: The method-dependent discrepancies between ELISA- and CLIA-based aPL assays regarding the quantitative and qualitative results are substantial. Both methods are suitable for APS classification, but the choice of aPL assay may influence the classification, and therefore, aPL results should be interpreted carefully in the clinical context. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by a hypercoagulable state, leading to severe vascular thrombosis and obstetric complications. The 2023 ACR/EULAR guidelines have revolutionized the classification and understanding of APS, introducing broader diagnostic criteria that encompass previously overlooked cardiac, renal, and hematologic manifestations. Despite these advancements, diagnosing APS remains particularly challenging in seronegative patients, where traditional tests fail, yet clinical symptoms persist. Emerging non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies offer promising new diagnostic and management avenues for these patients. Managing APS involves a strategic balance of cardiovascular risk mitigation and long-term anticoagulation therapy, though the use of direct oral anticoagulants remains contentious due to varying efficacy and safety profiles. This article delves into the intricate pathogenesis of APS, explores the latest classification criteria, and evaluates cutting-edge diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies. Full article

Cancer patients have higher prevalences of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), occasionally associated with thrombotic events. A cross-sectional study regarding the presence of criteria (IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin-aCL, anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI) and non-criteria (IgG/IgM anti-phosphatidylserine-aPS, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine-aPE, anti-prothrombin-aPT) aPLs in 146 patients with involuntary weight loss was performed. None of the patients had thrombotic events during the study. Out of the 36 cancer patients, 33 had non-hematologic malignancies. In the cancer subgroup, 60% of the patients had at least one positive aPL, with significantly more patients being positive for aβ2GPI IgG compared with the non-cancer subgroup—p = 0.03, OR = 2.23 (1.02–4.88). When evaluating the titres, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, aPE IgG, and aPS IgG had significantly higher values in cancer patients, the best cancer predictor being aβ2GPI IgG—AUC 0.642 (0.542–0.742). Gastrointestinal cancer patients were studied separately, and aCL IgM positivity was significantly higher—p = 0.008, OR = 6.69 (1.35–33.02). Both the titres of aCL IgM (p = 0.006) and aPS IgM (p = 0.03) were higher in the gastrointestinal cancer subgroup, with aCL IgM being the best predictor for gastrointestinal cancer development—AUC 0.808 (0.685–0.932). Despite criteria and non-criteria aPLs being frequent in cancer, their connection with thrombosis in these patients is probably dependent on other important risk factors and needs further research. Full article

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are strongly associated with thrombosis seen in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. In COVID-19, thrombosis has been observed as one of the main comorbidities. In patients hospitalised for COVID-19, we want to check whether APLA positivity is associated with COVID-19-related thrombosis, inflammation, severity of disease, or long COVID-19. We enrolled 92 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 between March and April 2020 who were tested for 18 different APLAs (IgG and IgM) with a single line-immunoassay test. A total of 30 healthy blood donors were used to set the cut-off for each APLA positivity. Of the 92 COVID-19 inpatients, 30 (32.61%; 95% CI [23.41–43.29]) tested positive for APLA, of whom 10 (33.3%; 95% CI [17.94–52.86]) had more than one APLA positivity. Anti-phosphatidylserine IgM positivity was described in 5.4% of inpatients (n = 5) and was associated with the occurrence of COVID-19-related thrombosis (p = 0.046). Anti-cardiolipin IgM positivity was the most prevalent among the inpatients (n = 12, 13.0%) and was associated with a recorded thrombosis in their clinical history (p = 0.044); however, its positivity was not associated with the occurrence of thrombosis during their hospitalisation for COVID-19. Anti-phosphatidylinositol IgM positivity, with a prevalence of 5.4% (n = 5), was associated with higher levels of interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.007) and ferritin (p = 0.034). Neither of these APLA positivities was a risk factor for COVID-19 severity or a predictive marker for long COVID-19. In conclusion, almost a third of COVID-19 inpatients tested positive for at least one APLA. Anti-phosphatidylserine positivity in IgM class was associated with thrombosis, and anti-phosphatidylinositol positivity in IgM class was associated with inflammation, as noticed by elevated levels of IL-6. Thus, testing for non-criteria APLA to assess the risk of clinical complications in hospitalised COVID-19 patients might be beneficial. However, they were not related to disease severity or long COVID-19. Full article

The place of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is still debatable. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlations between the titres of non-criteria aPLs (anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine (aPS), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies), and the ones of the already studied criteria aPLs (anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI antibodies). Altogether, 72 APS (30 primary and 42 secondary) patients were included in our study. High correlation coefficients (rs) were found between aPS IgM and aCL IgM, overall (0.77, p < 0.01), as well as in the primary (0.81, p < 0.01), and secondary (0.75, p < 0.01) APS subgroups. Low or statistically insignificant correlations were observed between IgG/IgM isotypes of aPT and aCL, or aβ2GPI, in the entire study population, and when evaluating the subgroups. Therefore, moderate correlations were mainly identified between the tested non-criteria antibodies and the criteria ones, suggesting little added value for the use of the tested non-criteria aPLs, with the exception of aPT, which seems to have different kinetics and might be a promising APS diagnostic tool. Full article

The antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) increase the risk of developing thrombotic events and may coexist with a variety of autoimmune diseases. They can be detected chronically or temporarily in patients with infectious diseases, during drug therapy, or in cases of cancer. A thrombotic event with aPL detection is known as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and the diagnostic criteria include the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and β₂-glycoprotein-1(aβ₂GPI) antibodies. Other autoantigens recognized in APS are phosphatidylserine (aPS), prothrombin (aPT) and Annexin-5 (aA5). This real life study aimed to explore the connections between laboratory criteria and the prevalence of “non-criteria aPL” in APS. This study followed 300 patients with thrombosis and employed two phospholipid sensitivity assays for LA detection, chemiluminescence assays for aCL and aβ₂GPI and enzyme-linked immunoassays for aPS, aPT and aA5. A significant association was found between aPS and aCL (r = 0.76) as well as aβ₂GPI (r = 0.77), while the association with LA was less significant (r = 0.33). The results of the aPT and aA5 test did not correlate with criteria-antiphospholipid antibodies (r < 0.30). Since the risk of thrombotic complications increases with the intensity and the number of positive autoantibodies, measuring aPT and aA5 autoantibodies may be useful, particularly in aCL/aβ₂GPI-negative patients or in cases of isolated LA positivity. Full article

Despite recent advances in treatment and significant improvements in prognosis, thrombosis remains the major cause of death in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are the main triggers of thrombosis in patients with SLE, with a frequency of approximately 30–40%. Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, which are included in the criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome, and ‘non-criteria’ aPL such as anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex antibodies, are risk factors for thrombosis in patients with SLE. Multiple positivity for aPL is also associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, and scores calculated from aPL profiles can predict the risk of developing thrombosis. Although there is insufficient evidence for treatment, aPL-positive SLE patients should/may be treated with anticoagulants and/or low-dose aspirin as appropriate. This review summarises the evidence on the clinical significance of the aPL profile as a biomarker of thrombophilia in patients with SLE. Full article

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a serious and life-threatening complication occurring after adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines, and is rarely reported after other vaccine types. Herein, we report a case of possible VITT after the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine booster, who presented with extensive lower limb deep vein thrombosis, severe thrombocytopenia, markedly elevated D-dimer and positive anti-PF4 antibody occurring 2 weeks post-vaccination, concurrent with a lupus anticoagulant. A complete recovery was made after intravenous immunoglobulin, prednisolone and anticoagulation with the oral direct Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. The presenting features of VITT may overlap with those of antiphospholipid syndrome associated with anti-PF4 and immune thrombocytopenia. We discuss the diagnostic considerations in VITT and highlight the challenges of performing VITT confirmatory assays in non-specialized settings. The set of five diagnostic criteria for VITT is a useful tool for guiding initial management, but may potentially include patients without VITT. The bleeding risks of severe thrombocytopenia in the face of thrombosis, requiring anticoagulant therapy, present a clinical challenge, but early recognition and management can potentially lead to favorable outcomes. Full article

A prospectively study of pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome, or non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome was conducted to describe the characteristics of women followed in a referral unit and to derive a predictive tool for adverse pregnancy outcome (APO). Demographic characteristics, treatments, SLE activity, and flares were recorded. Laboratory data included a complete blood cell count, protein-to-creatinine urinary ratio (Pr/Cr ratio), complement, anti dsDNA, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La, and antiphospholipid antibodies status. A stepwise regression was used to identify baseline characteristics available before pregnancy and during the 1st trimester that were most predictive of APO and to create the predictive model. A total of 217 pregnancies were included. One or more APO occurred in 45 (20.7%) women. A baseline model including non-Caucasian ethnicity (OR 2.78; 95% CI [1.16–6.62]), smoking (OR 4.43; 95% CI [1.74–11.29]), pregestational hypertension (OR 16.13; 95% CI [4.06–64.02]), and pregestational corticosteroids treatment OR 2.98; 95% CI [1.30–6.87]) yielded an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, [0.70–0.86]). Among first-trimester parameters, only Pr/Cr ratio improved the model fit, but the predictive performance was not significantly improved (AUC of 0.78 vs. 0.81; p = 0.16). Better biomarkers need to be developed to efficiently stratify pregnant women with the most common autoimmune diseases. Full article