Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 829 KiB  
Article
Continuous Gastric pH Monitoring in Children Facilitates Better Understanding of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Observational Study
by Shiva Sharma, Devendra I. Mehta, Nishant Patel, Arun Ajmera, Jeffrey Bornstein and Florence George
Children 2025, 12(2), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12020236 - 15 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1044
Abstract
Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly encountered in adults and children. A subset of patients with GERD are refractory to acid suppressants, implicating other factors in the refluxate. Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) produces similar symptoms through reflux of non-acidic duodenal content and the [...] Read more.
Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly encountered in adults and children. A subset of patients with GERD are refractory to acid suppressants, implicating other factors in the refluxate. Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) produces similar symptoms through reflux of non-acidic duodenal content and the cytotoxic effect of bile in the esophageal mucosa. Various methods have been utilized to detect DGR using a Bilitec device or Hepatobiliary scintigraphy, amongst the most common, each with their own limitations. We aimed to use combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) monitoring with an additional gastric pH sensor to collect information about acidic and non-acidic gastroesophageal refluxes and to assess whether continuous gastric pH measurement in children provides indirect evidence of DGR for better understanding of the symptoms. Methods: From 2022 through 2023, clinically symptomatic pediatric patients scheduled for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and MII-pH at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children in the United States were included (n = 26). Exclusions included patients taking acid suppressants prior to the start of this study. The data were analyzed for subjects completing at least 18 h of the study protocol. Results: Subjects with a normal pH impedance (n = 5) showed a median non-meal gastric pH of 1.8. Subjects with an abnormal pH impedance (n = 21) showed a median non-meal gastric pH of 2.2. Of the 26 subjects enrolled, the duration of non-meal gastric pH 4.0–7.0 was positively correlated with non-acidic gastroesophageal refluxes. Although all acidic reflux events occurred at gastric pH < 4.0, there was no correlation between the duration of non-meal gastric pH < 4.0 and impedance changes or reflux index. Conclusions: The results showed daily variability in the non-meal gastric pH of pediatric patients and a statistically significant correlation between its duration at pH 4.0 to 7.0 and non-acidic refluxes suggestive of the implication of DGR. Further research is required to assess this association with gastroesophageal reflux and dyspeptic symptoms to investigate the diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions, including the role of prokinetics and surface protective agents for DGR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 439 KiB  
Article
Decoding Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Unraveling Symptoms Through Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Insights
by Ivan Pavić, Petar Prcela, Josip Pejić, Irena Babić, Ana Močić Pavić and Iva Hojsak
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010034 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 916
Abstract
Background: The relationship between symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and objective reflux measurements obtained through multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring remains unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between LPR symptoms and objective reflux episodes and possible associations [...] Read more.
Background: The relationship between symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and objective reflux measurements obtained through multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring remains unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between LPR symptoms and objective reflux episodes and possible associations between fibreoptic ENT findings, eosinophil counts, and serum IgE levels with reflux episodes detected by MII-pH. Methods: In this prospective study, MII-pH monitoring, fiberoptic laryngoscopy, nasal swabs for eosinophils, total serum IgE levels, and symptom assessment (Reflux Symptom Index, RSI) were performed in all children with suspected LPR. The Reflux Findings Score (RFS) was determined based on the laryngoscopy findings. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age, 8 years) with LPR symptoms were included in the study. The number of reflux episodes was highest in children with chronic cough and recurrent broncho-obstruction. Secondary outcomes showed positive correlations between reflux episodes and ENT findings, particularly hypopharyngeal hyperemia, arytenoid hyperemia, and arytenoid erythema (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The number of total, acidic, and weakly acidic reflux episodes was significantly positively correlated with RSI and RFS. Proximal total, acidic, and weakly acidic reflux episodes showed significant correlations with eosinophil counts in nasal swabs but negative correlations with serum IgE levels. Conclusions: This study highlights the significant role of weakly acidic reflux in pediatric LPR and its association with respiratory symptoms. Our findings emphasize the importance of objective monitoring techniques in the assessment of LPR and provide insights for refining diagnostic and management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pediatric Gastrointestinal Pathology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1817 KiB  
Article
Comparison between Conventional and Simple Measuring Methods of Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance in Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
by Radu Samuel Pop, Lăcrămioara Eliza Chiperi, Vlad-Ionuț Nechita, Sorin Claudiu Man and Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu
Clin. Pract. 2024, 14(5), 1682-1695; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050134 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1562
Abstract
(1) Background: Multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring is commonly used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is an important parameter, reflecting the esophageal mucosal integrity and improvement in GERD. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring is commonly used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is an important parameter, reflecting the esophageal mucosal integrity and improvement in GERD. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between conventionally measured MNBI and a recently described simple MNBI measurement method in diagnosing pediatric GERD. (2) Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 64 children aged one month to 18 years who underwent 24 h MII-pH monitoring. Conventional MNBI was measured during stable 10 min intervals at night, while the simple MNBI method averaged impedance throughout the nocturnal supine period. (3) Results: Strong correlations were found between conventional and simple MNBI values across all impedance channels in both infants (r > 0.85) and older children (r > 0.9). Conventional and simple MNBIs in the most distal channel (Z6) effectively differentiated non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) from other phenotypes, with AUCs of 0.864 and 0.860, respectively. The simple MNBI demonstrated good diagnostic performance with similar sensitivity and specificity to the conventional MNBI. (4) Conclusions: Including MNBI measurements into routine MII-pH monitoring may enhance GERD diagnosis and reduce the need for more invasive procedures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 464 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Utility of pH-MII Monitoring in Preschool Children with Recurrent Wheeze and Suspected Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Study
by Ivan Pavić, Roberta Šarkanji-Golub and Iva Hojsak
Diagnostics 2023, 13(23), 3567; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13233567 - 29 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1458
Abstract
Background: Recurrent wheezing and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are common in young children, with a suggested but challenging link between them. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of pH-MII monitoring in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and evaluate GERD-related therapy effects. [...] Read more.
Background: Recurrent wheezing and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are common in young children, with a suggested but challenging link between them. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of pH-MII monitoring in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and evaluate GERD-related therapy effects. Methods: Children under 6 years with recurrent wheeze were eligible. The pH-MII monitoring was conducted in those clinically suspected of GERD’s involvement. Flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in severe cases. The primary outcome was the difference in wheezing episodes between proven GERD and non-GERD groups. Secondary outcomes included GERD therapy impact and predictive factors for wheezing reduction. Results: Of 66 children (mean age 3.9 years), 71% had proven GERD on pH-MII. Compared to the non-GERD group, the GERD group had higher total, liquid, mixed, and gas reflux episodes, as well as more acidic and weakly acidic episodes. GERD treatment significantly reduced wheezing episodes. PPI (proton pump inhibitor) introduction was associated with ≥50% wheezing reduction. Children with GERD showed ≥50% wheezing reduction more frequently than those without GERD. PPI usage, higher total GER episodes, acidic episodes, and liquid and proximal episodes on MII predicted ≥50% wheezing reduction. No significant BAL differences were observed between GERD and non-GERD groups. Conclusions: The pH-MII monitoring is valuable in diagnosing GERD-related wheezing in preschool children. GERD therapy, particularly PPI usage, was associated with reduced wheezing episodes. The pH-MII parameters correlated with wheezing reduction, suggesting their potential predictive role. BAL did not differentiate between GERD and non-GERD cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6521 KiB  
Review
Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review
by Jerome R. Lechien
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(11), 1567; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13111567 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5164
Abstract
Objective: To review the current findings of the literature on the existence of several profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and to propose personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Methods: A state-of-the art review of the literature was conducted using the PubMED, Scopus, and [...] Read more.
Objective: To review the current findings of the literature on the existence of several profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and to propose personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Methods: A state-of-the art review of the literature was conducted using the PubMED, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The information related to epidemiology, demographics, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic responses were extracted to identify outcomes that may influence the clinical and therapeutic courses of LPR. Results: The clinical presentation and therapeutic courses of LPR may be influenced by gender, age, weight, comorbidities, dietary habits and culture, anxiety, stress, and saliva enzyme profile. The clinical expression of reflux, including laryngopharyngeal, respiratory, nasal, and eye symptoms, and the hypopharyngeal–esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring profile of patients are important issues to improve in patient management. The use of more personalized therapeutic strategies appears to be associated with better symptom relief and cures over the long-term. The role of pepsin in LPR physiology is well-established but the lack of information about the role of other gastrointestinal enzymes in the development of LPR-related mucosa inflammation limits the development of future enzyme-based personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Conclusion: Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a challenging ear, nose, and throat condition associated with poor therapeutic responses and a long-term burden in Western countries. Artificial intelligence should be used for developing personalized therapeutic strategies based on patient features. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Personalized Therapy and Drug Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1798 KiB  
Review
Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Past, Present, and Future—A Mini-Review
by Han-Chung Lien, Ping-Huan Lee and Chen-Chi Wang
Diagnostics 2023, 13(9), 1643; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091643 - 7 May 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6391
Abstract
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which gastric refluxate irritates the lining of the aerodigestive tract and causes troublesome airway symptoms or complications. LPR is a prevalent disease that creates a significant socioeconomic burden due to its [...] Read more.
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which gastric refluxate irritates the lining of the aerodigestive tract and causes troublesome airway symptoms or complications. LPR is a prevalent disease that creates a significant socioeconomic burden due to its negative impact on quality of life, tremendous medical expense, and possible cancer risk. Although treatment modalities are similar between LPR and GERD, the diagnosis of LPR is more challenging than GERD due to its non-specific symptoms/signs. Due to the lack of pathognomonic features of endoscopy, mounting evidence focused on physiological diagnostic testing. Two decades ago, a dual pH probe was considered the gold standard for detecting pharyngeal acidic reflux episodes. Despite an association with LPR, the dual pH was unable to predict the treatment response in clinical practice, presumably due to frequently encountered artifacts. Currently, hypopharygneal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH catheters incorporating two trans-upper esophageal sphincter impedance sensors enable to differentiate pharyngeal refluxes from swallows. The validation of pharyngeal acid reflux episodes that are relevant to anti-reflux treatment is, therefore, crucial. Given no diagnostic gold standard of LPR, this review article aimed to discuss the evolution of objective diagnostic testing and its predictive role of treatment response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 310 KiB  
Review
Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: An Evidence-Based Review
by Jerome R. Lechien
Children 2023, 10(3), 583; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030583 - 18 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4562
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (P-LPR) is associated with the development of common otolaryngological symptoms and findings. In the present study, the findings about epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of pediatric population were reviewed. Methods: A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature [...] Read more.
Purpose: Pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (P-LPR) is associated with the development of common otolaryngological symptoms and findings. In the present study, the findings about epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of pediatric population were reviewed. Methods: A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature search was conducted about evidence-based findings in epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of P-LPR. Findings: The prevalence of LPR remains unknown in infant and child populations. The clinical presentation depends on age. Infants with LPR symptoms commonly have both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux and related digestive, respiratory and ear, nose and throat symptoms. The GERD prevalence appears to decrease over the growth, and the clinical picture is increasingly associated with LPR symptoms and findings without GERD. The prevalence of LPR and proximal acid and nonacid esophageal reflux events may be high in some prevalent otolaryngological conditions (chronic otitis media, laryngolomalacia and apnea). However, the lack of use of hypopharyngeal–esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) limits the establishment of etiological associations. Proton pump inhibitors are less effective in P-LPR patients compared to GERD populations, which may be related to the high prevalence of weakly or nonacid reflux events. Conclusions: Many gray areas persist in P-LPR and should be not resolved without the establishment of diagnostic criteria (guidelines) based on HEMII-pH. The unavailability of HEMII-pH and the poor acid-suppressive therapeutic response are all issues requiring future investigations. Future controlled studies using HEMII-pH and enzyme measurements in ear, nose or throat fluids may clarify the epidemiology of P-LPR according to age and its association with many otolaryngological conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Otolaryngology)
17 pages, 6951 KiB  
Article
Application of Wavelet Transform and Fractal Analysis for Esophageal pH-Metry to Determine a New Method to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
by Piotr Mateusz Tojza, Łukasz Doliński, Grzegorz Redlarski, Jacek Szkopek, Mariusz Dąbkowski and Maria Janiak
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010214 - 24 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2045
Abstract
In this paper, a new method for analysing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is shown. This novel method uses wavelet transform (WT) and wavelet-based fractal analysis (WBFA) on esophageal pH-metry measurements. The esophageal pH-metry is an important diagnostic tool supporting the physician’s work in [...] Read more.
In this paper, a new method for analysing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is shown. This novel method uses wavelet transform (WT) and wavelet-based fractal analysis (WBFA) on esophageal pH-metry measurements. The esophageal pH-metry is an important diagnostic tool supporting the physician’s work in diagnosing some forms of reflux diseases. Interpreting the results of 24-h pH-metry monitoring is time-consuming, and the conclusions of such an analysis can sometimes be too subjective. There is no strict procedure or reference values to follow when the impedance measurements are assessed. Therefore, an attempt was made to develop a point of reference for the assessment process, helping to distinguish healthy patients from GERD patients. In this approach, wavelet transform (WT) and wavelet-based fractal analysis (WBFA) were used to aid the diagnostic process. With this approach, it was possible to develop two efficient computer methods to classify healthy and sick patients based on the pH measurement data alone. The WT method provided a sensitivity value of 93.33%, with 75% specificity. The results of the fractal analysis confirmed that the tested signals have features that enable their automatic classification and assignment to a group of sick or healthy people. The article will be interesting for those studying the application of wavelet and fractal analysis in biomedical waveforms. The authors included in the work a description of the implementation of the fractal and wavelet analysis, the descriptions of the results of the analyses, and the conclusions drawn from them. The work will also be of interest to those who study the methods of using machine learning and artificial intelligence in computer-aided, automatic medical diagnostics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biosignal Processing and Biomedical Data Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 4216 KiB  
Article
Do Otolaryngologists Over- or Underestimate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Findings in Clinical Practice? A Comparison Study between the True Prevalence and the Otolaryngologist-Estimated Prevalence of Symptoms and Findings
by Jerome R. Lechien
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175192 - 1 Sep 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2469
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to compare them with the otolaryngologist-estimated prevalence of the most common LPR-related symptoms and signs. Methods: The prevalence of LPR symptoms and signs was determined through the clinical data [...] Read more.
Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to compare them with the otolaryngologist-estimated prevalence of the most common LPR-related symptoms and signs. Methods: The prevalence of LPR symptoms and signs was determined through the clinical data of 403 patients with a positive LPR diagnosis on hypopharyngeal–esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. The otolaryngologist-estimated prevalence was assessed through an international survey investigating the thoughts of 824 otolaryngologists toward LPR symptom and sign prevalence. The determination of potential over- or underestimation of LPR symptoms and findings was investigated through a data comparison between the ‘true’ prevalence and the ‘estimated prevalence’ of symptoms and findings by otolaryngologists. Results: The prevalence of breathing difficulties, coated tongue, and ventricular band inflammation was adequately evaluated by otolaryngologists. The prevalence of hoarseness, throat pain, odynophagia, dysphagia, throat clearing, globus sensation, excess throat mucus, tongue burning, heartburn, regurgitations, halitosis, cough after eating or lying down, and troublesome cough was overestimated by otolaryngologists (p < 0.01), while the prevalence of chest pain was underestimated as an LPR symptom. Most laryngeal signs, e.g., arytenoid/laryngeal erythema, inter-arytenoid granulation, posterior commissure hypertrophy, retrocricoid edema/erythema, and endolaryngeal sticky mucus, were overestimated (p < 0.01). The occurrence of anterior pillar erythema and tongue tonsil hypertrophy was underestimated by participants. Conclusion: Most laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms and laryngeal signs were overestimated by otolaryngologists, while some non-laryngeal findings were underestimated. Future studies are needed to better understand the reasons for this phenomenon and to improve the awareness of otolaryngologists toward the most and least prevalent reflux symptoms and signs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The Last Decade)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1541 KiB  
Review
Clinical Update Findings about pH-Impedance Monitoring Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients
by Jerome R. Lechien
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(11), 3158; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113158 - 1 Jun 2022
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3972
Abstract
Purpose: The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is commonly based on non-specific symptoms and findings and a positive response to an empirical therapeutic trial. The therapeutic response is, however, unpredictable, and many patients need pH-impedance monitoring to confirm the diagnosis. Methods: A review [...] Read more.
Purpose: The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is commonly based on non-specific symptoms and findings and a positive response to an empirical therapeutic trial. The therapeutic response is, however, unpredictable, and many patients need pH-impedance monitoring to confirm the diagnosis. Methods: A review of the recent literature was conducted in PubMED, Scopus, and Embase about the pH-study features of LPR patients. A summary of last evidence was proposed. Results: The awareness of otolaryngologists about indications and interpretation of pH-impedance monitoring is low. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) is the most reliable examination determining the type and composition of hypopharyngeal reflux events (HRE) and the LPR features. The use of HEMII-pH is important to confirm the diagnosis in selected patients because non-specificity of symptoms and findings. There are no international consensus guidelines for the LPR diagnosis at the HEMII-pH. However, most studies supported the occurrence of >1 acid/weakly acid/nonacid HRE as diagnostic threshold. HREs are more frequently gaseous, weakly/nonacid compared with reflux events of gastroesophageal reflux. HREs occurred as daytime and upright, which does not support the value of double proton pump inhibitors or bedtime alginate. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring is another approach reporting different sensitivity and specificity outcomes from HEMII-pH. The use of Ryan score for the LPR diagnosis at the oropharyngeal pH monitoring may be controversial regarding the low consideration of alkaline HREs. Conclusions: The awareness of otolaryngologists about HEMII-pH indication, features, and interpretation is an important issue regarding the high prevalence of LPR in outpatients consulting in otolaryngology. The HEMII-pH findings may indicate a more personalized treatment considering type and occurrence time of HREs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The Last Decade)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1598 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Value of the PeptestTM in Detecting Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
by Karol Zeleník, Viktória Hránková, Adéla Vrtková, Lucia Staníková, Pavel Komínek and Martin Formánek
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(13), 2996; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132996 - 5 Jul 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3568
Abstract
Background: The PeptestTM is a non-invasive diagnostic test for measuring the pepsin concentration in saliva, which is thought to correlate with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the Peptest in detecting LPR based [...] Read more.
Background: The PeptestTM is a non-invasive diagnostic test for measuring the pepsin concentration in saliva, which is thought to correlate with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the Peptest in detecting LPR based on 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring using several hypopharyngeal reflux episodes as criterion for LPR. Methods: Patients with suspected LPR were examined with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), fasting Peptest, and MII-pH monitoring. We calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Peptest, RSI, and RFS based on the threshold of one and six hypopharyngeal reflux episodes. Results: Altogether, the data from 46 patients were analyzed. When one hypopharyngeal reflux episode was used as a diagnostic threshold for LPR, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, as follows: 35%, 33%, 100%, 100%, and 3%, for the Peptest; 39%, 40%, 0%, 95%, and 0%, for the RSI; and 57%, 58%, 0%, 96%, and 0%, for the RFS. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Peptest for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were 46%, 27%, 63%, 40.0%, and 48%, respectively. Conclusions: A positive Peptest is highly supportive of a pathological LPR diagnosis. However, a negative test could not exclude LPR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The Last Decade)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 416 KiB  
Article
Effects on Gastroesophageal Reflux of Donkey Milk-Derived Human Milk Fortifier Versus Standard Fortifier in Preterm Newborns: Additional Data from the FortiLat Study
by Francesco Cresi, Elena Maggiora, Alice Pirra, Paola Tonetto, Carlotta Rubino, Laura Cavallarin, Marzia Giribaldi, Guido E. Moro, Chiara Peila and Alessandra Coscia
Nutrients 2020, 12(7), 2142; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072142 - 18 Jul 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4000
Abstract
Background: Feeding intolerance is a frequent diagnosis in very preterm infants. As seen in the FortiLat trial, human milk fortification with the new donkey milk-derived human milk fortifier (DF) seems to improve feeding tolerance in these infants. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Background: Feeding intolerance is a frequent diagnosis in very preterm infants. As seen in the FortiLat trial, human milk fortification with the new donkey milk-derived human milk fortifier (DF) seems to improve feeding tolerance in these infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using the DF compared with bovine milk-derived fortifier (BF) on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Methods: Over a total of 156 preterm infants were enrolled into the FortiLat trial (GA <32 weeks and birth weight <1500 g) and randomized into the BF arm or DF arm, and we selected all infants with clinical signs of GER and cardiorespiratory (CR) symptoms. All the infants underwent CR and multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII/pH) monitoring associated with gastric ultrasound to evaluate GER and gastric emptying time. Results: 10 infants were enrolled, and 5 were in the DF arm. At MII/pH, infants enrolled into the DF arm showed a lower GER frequency than BF arm infants (p = 0.036). Half gastric emptying time was similar in DF and BF arm infants (p = 0.744). Conclusion: The use of donkey-derived human milk fortifier reduced the GER frequency and consequently should be recommended in infants with feeding intolerance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Donkey Milk and Infant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 304 KiB  
Article
Age and Upper Airway Obstruction: A Challenge to the Clinical Approach in Pediatric Patients
by Nosetti Luana, Zaffanello Marco, De Bernardi Francesca, Piacentini Giorgio, Roberto Giulia, Salvatore Silvia, Simoncini Daniela, Pietrobelli Angelo and Agosti Massimo
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3531; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103531 - 18 May 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3782
Abstract
Upper airway abnormalities increase the risk of pediatric morbidity in infants. A multidisciplinary approach to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) poses challenges to clinical practice. The incidence and causes of OSA are poorly studied in children under 2 years of age. To fill [...] Read more.
Upper airway abnormalities increase the risk of pediatric morbidity in infants. A multidisciplinary approach to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) poses challenges to clinical practice. The incidence and causes of OSA are poorly studied in children under 2 years of age. To fill this gap, we performed this retrospective observational study to determine the causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and February 2018, after a brief unexplained event (BRUE) or for OSA. We reviewed the medical charts of 82 patients (39 males; BRUE n = 48; OSAS n = 34) and divided them into two age groups: < 1 year old (1–12 months; n = 59) and >1 year old (>12–24 months; n = 23). Assessment included nap polysomnography, multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH, and nasopharyngoscopy. Sleep disordered breathing was comparable between the two groups. Omega-shaped epiglottis, laryngomalacia, and nasal septum deviation were more frequent in the younger group, and nasal congestion in older group. Tonsillar and adenoidal hypertrophy was more frequent in the older group, while laryngomalacia and gastroesophageal reflux was more frequent in the younger group. Tonsil and adenoid size were associated with grade of apnea-hypopnea index severity in the older group, and laryngomalacia and gastroesophageal reflux in the younger group. The main causes of respiratory sleep disorders differ in children before or after age 1 year. Our findings have potential clinical utility for assessing the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep disordered breathing in patients less than 2 years old. Full article
Back to TopTop