Search Results (40)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers, with poor survival even after surgical resection. Clinical stages include resectable (R-PDAC), borderline resectable (BR-PDAC), locally advanced, and metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)—chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before surgery—has emerged as a promising strategy to improve outcomes by increasing margin-negative resection rates and enhancing overall survival. For R-PDAC, surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard, but NAT may be considered in high-risk patients, such as those with severe pain, elevated CA 19-9, or large tumors. For BR-PDAC, NAT is the primary approach, significantly increasing R0 resection rates and prolonging survival. Common regimens include mFOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based combinations. NAT also carries risks, including disease progression during therapy, loss of resectability, and uncertainty in evaluating response. Current tools, such as imaging and CA 19-9, offer limited predictive value. The role of NAT in R-PDAC remains under debate, while its benefits in BR-PDAC are more established. This review summarizes current evidence and guidelines on NAT in PDAC, with a focus on treatment strategies, patient selection, and emerging approaches. Full article

Objective: The optimal patient subgroup that derives substantial benefit from triplet chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI/FOLFIRINOX) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and the clinical scenarios in which its increased toxicity is justified, remain uncertain. This study employed a machine learning–based approach to develop a predictive biomarker capable of identifying patients most likely to benefit from triplet therapy. Methods: Clinical data from 136 patients in the Ankara University de novo mCRC cohort were retrospectively reviewed. 66 clinical and biochemical variables were analyzed. Consistent with the existing literature, progression-free survival (PFS) ≥ 270 days was selected as the primary outcome. Individual treatment effect (ITE) estimation was performed using the T-Learner method with separate regression models for each treatment arm (μ1 − μ0). Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Feature importance was assessed using SHAP analysis, after which a reduced model was constructed using only the most influential variables. Results: The model incorporating all features demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with a ROC AUC of 0.919. SHAP analysis identified the top 10 predictive variables: primary tumor localization, ferritin, CA19-9, CRP, uric acid, TSH, triglycerides, total protein, LDL, and platelet count. The reduced model built using only these 10 features achieved an AUC of 0.869 for predicting PFS ≥270 days. Conclusion: This machine learning–based model presents a promising framework for improving patient selection for triplet chemotherapy in mCRC. Prospective validation in larger cohorts will be essential to support its integration into clinical decision making. Full article

Background: Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) is an aggressive disease with high morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival rates remain poor. New therapeutic options that demonstrate statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are still being sought. Although many first-line (FL) treatment studies exist in the literature, there are almost no prospective studies on second-line (SL) therapy. Methods: The aim of this clinical study was to retrospectively analyze the medical history of 251 patients diagnosed with mPC, treated first-line (FL) with GEM-NAB between February 2017 and January 2025. After disease progression, 109 patients received SL treatment. We also present a multivariate analysis based on routinely collected data (demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters) evaluating their impact on OS and PFS. Results: The median age was 66 years (range 37–84 years). The median PFS was 2.33 months (95% CI 1.69–2.97). Specifically, the mPFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 1.31–6.90) for FOLFIRINOX; 2.8 months (95% CI 2.30–3.30) for FOLFIRI; 2.37 months (95% CI 1.66–3.08) for NALIRI; 1.47 months (95% CI 1.18–1.75) for FOLFOX 6; and 0.93 months (95% CI 0.00–2.64) for GEM-cisplatin. The median OS was 5.03 months (95% CI 3.75–6.31). Seven patients achieved a partial response (overall response rate 6%). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) included anemia, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: As a result, SL treatments were compared, and some statistically significant difference was found between them in PFS time for chemotherapy FOLFIRINOX and GEM + cisplatin. The most frequent AEs occurred during treatment with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a formidable challenge in oncology due to its aggressive progression, propensity for early metastasis, and resistance to conventional therapies. The development of effective and less toxic treatments is crucial for improving the prognosis of PDAC. We aimed to investigate the synergistic antitumor potential of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) combined with natural killer (NK) cell therapy in PDAC models. Methods: We evaluated changes in NK-cell-activating ligands and apoptosis-inducing receptor expression after mFOLFIRINOX treatment both in vitro and in vivo. Subsequently, NK cells were administered to mFOLFIRINOX-pre-treated PDAC cells to assess NK cell cytotoxicity, immune responses, and tumor progression both in vitro and in vivo mouse models. Results: Treatment with mFOLFIRINOX led to the significant upregulation of NK-cell-activating ligands and apoptosis-inducing receptors across the PDAC cell lines and tumor cells collected in vivo, thereby enhancing their susceptibility to NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In comparison with either treatment alone, mFOLFIRINOX and NK cell combination therapy resulted in enhanced cytolysis in all cell lines. In vivo studies demonstrated that combination therapy substantially inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in a mouse model. Conclusions: mFOLFIRINOX combined with NK cell therapy demonstrates enhanced antitumor activity against PDAC, potentially improving clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the need for continued research to optimize this combination strategy for clinical utility. Full article

Background: Ampullary adenocarcinoma is a rare cancer for which there are no standard adjuvant treatment recommendations due to the lack of randomized clinical trials. The primary aim of this analysis is to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 15 institutions in Turkey between August 2007 and January 2024, involving 211 patients with resected, non-metastatic ampullary adenocarcinoma receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with various chemotherapy regimens with or without chemoradiation. Clinicopathological and treatment-related parameters were recorded. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify covariates associated with OS. Results: The median follow-up time was 52 months, and 116 patients (55.2%) were alive at the time of the analysis. The median age was 61 years (32–82). mFOLFIRINOX was administered to 16.6% of the patients (n = 35). The 3-year DFS rate was 79.41% in the FOLFIRINOX-treated arm and 53.9% in the other treatment arm (p = 0.034 for mDFS). The median OS was non-reached in patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX treatment, while it was 51 months in patients receiving other treatments (p = 0.071). While no statistically significant results were reached, a trend toward statistically significant survival times was observed in the FOLFIRINOX arm. After adjustment for other prognostic parameters, mFOLFIRINOX remained an independent statistically significant parameter for better OS (HR; 95% CI: 3.24; 1.02–10.9; p = 0.046). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX treatment has shown efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of ampullary cancer, independent of histological subtype. The findings should be validated in large prospective trials. Full article

Background: Adenocarcinoma arising from the ampulla of Vater is an extremely rare neoplasm, and there are limited data regarding frontline therapy for metastatic disease. We investigated the outcomes of first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX by comparing it with other treatments in patients with advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma. Methods: We included 123 patients with advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma who were treated with frontline FOLFIRINOX (n = 32), fluorouracil (FU)-based chemotherapy (n = 20), and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (n = 65) between August 2007 and January 2024 in this retrospective study. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) according to treatment and clinicopathological features were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The median age of the patients was 62 years (range, 36–78), and 75,6% of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 0–1. The mOS were 13 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), 11 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), and 12 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.4), respectively [p = 0.865]. There were no significant differences in OS among the chemotherapeutic agents according to histological subtypes. However, FOLFIRINOX and FU-based treatments appeared more effective in the intestinal subtype, while gemcitabine-based therapies were less effective. In the pancreaticobiliary subtype, FU-based therapies yielded a shorter outcome compared to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based therapies. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: In advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma, despite higher toxicity, frontline FOLFIRINOX showed a trend toward an OS benefit in the intestinal subtype while providing a similar outcome in the pancreaticobiliary subtype. Full article

Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of SMART (50 Gy/5 fractions) vs. HART (75 Gy/25 fractions or 67.5 Gy/15 fractions with concurrent capecitabine) for LAPC. Gray’s test and Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 211 patients (SMART, n = 91; HART, n = 120) were evaluated, and none had surgery. Median follow-up after SMART and HART was 27.0 and 40.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0002). SMART achieved higher gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and greater hotspots. Two-year LF after SMART and HART was 6.5% and 32.9% (p < 0.001), while two-year OS was 31.0% vs. 35.3% (p = 0.056), respectively. LF was associated with SMART vs. HART (HR 5.389, 95% CI: 1.298–21.975; p = 0.021) and induction mFOLFIRINOX vs. non-mFOLFIRINOX (HR 2.067, 95% CI 1.038–4.052; p = 0.047), while OS was associated with CA19-9 decrease > 40% (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.515–0.996; p = 0.046) and GTV V120% (HR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006–1.037; p = 0.015). Acute grade > 3 toxicity was similar (3.3% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.390), while late grade > 3 toxicity was less common after SMART (2.2% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Ablative SMART and HART both achieve favorable oncologic outcomes for LAPC with minimal toxicity. We did not observe an OS difference, although technical advantages of SMART might improve target coverage and reduce LF. Full article

Background/Objectives: Treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by complex surgery, posing significant risks of toxicity, complications, and changes in quality of life (QoL). This study aims to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on overall survival (OS) and QoL. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRPC and LAPC included in a population-based study (NORPACT-2) from January 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed. Results: A total of 54 patients (BRPC; n = 43, LAPC; n = 11) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy. The majority (66.7%) received (m)FOLFIRINOX. Forty-six (85.2%) patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Vascular resection was performed in 32 (59.3%) patients. Fourteen (25.9%) patients experienced major complications. The majority of the resected specimens demonstrated T2 (63%), N+ (79.6%), and R1 (85.2%) status. Median OS was 31 (CI 24.7–37.3) months. In multivariate analysis, only CAP 3 (p = 0.035) predicted worse survival. Forty (74.1%) patients experienced recurrence. Global QoL (p = 0.031), social and role functioning (p = 0.024, p = 0.031), improved three months after surgery. Pain (p = 0.042), dyspnea (p = 0.004), appetite loss (p = 0.028), and diarrhea (p = 0.007) improved post-resection. Conclusions: Patients with BRPC and LAPC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection have survival comparable to primary resectable pancreatic cancer. Postoperative morbidity was acceptable, and QoL recovered post-surgery. CAP grade was the only independent negative prognostic factor. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) typically exhibits asymptomatic clinical features, with most patients diagnosed at an advanced metastatic stage. Current treatment options are limited to cytotoxic standard therapies, primarily FOLFIRINOX or modified FOLFIRINOX regimens. This highlights a critical need for targeted therapies to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity. We have sought to identify potential biomarkers based on DNA methylation profiles to identify patient groupings with improved overall survival (OS) based on the Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFB) gene complex, and the interferon-related pathway gene, IFI27, using the TCGA dataset for PDAC patients. We employed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to directly compare hazard ratios for TGFB1/2/3 and IFI27 methylation impacting OS. We also controlled for age at diagnosis, sex, and TGFB2 gene methylation by examining the statistical interactions between the marker gene mRNA expression and the TGFB2 gene. Genes were filtered based on the tumor-specific expression patterns and Cox models with highly significant interaction terms to identify mRNA expression of genes that amplified the impact of TGFB2 methylation. The effect of the TGFB2 gene methylation in the context of marker gene mRNA expression was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis. Marker genes were correlated to T-cell enrichment patterns using the deconvolution algorithms provided by the TIMER 2.0 database. Methylation of TGFB2, TGFB3 and IFI27 genes using median cut-off values for KM plots showed significant improvements in median overall survival of 5.7 (p = 0.044), 5.2 (p = 0.036), and 3.7 (p = 0.028) months for high methylation levels for TGFB2, IFI27, and TGFB3 genes, respectively. In contrast, high levels of TGFB1 methylation exhibited a shorter 4.7 (p = 0.016) month median OS time. The impact of TGFB2 methylation was amplified at low expressions of marker genes that were highly correlated with CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. Patients with high levels of TGFB2 methylation when compared to low levels of TGFB2 methylation showed median overall survival (OS) improvements at low mRNA expression levels: 54.2 months for CD3D (p < 0.0001); 54 months for LCK (p = 0.0009); 54.9 months for HLA-DRA (p = 0.0001); and 9 months for RAC2 mRNA expression (p = 0.0057). TGFB2 gene methylation drives TGFB2 mRNA expression to achieve clinical impact, as high levels of TGFB2 mRNA, at low levels of the marker genes, resulted in worse median OS times. TGFB2 methylation is a prognostic marker for PDAC patients within an immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment characterized by low CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. This correlation is functionally associated with TGFB2 mRNA production, suggesting that targeting TGFB2 mRNA through knockdown can potentially enhance PDAC prognosis. Full article

Background: In patients with curatively resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), evidence supporting the benefit of additional adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) remains limited. We aim to identify favorable factors contributing to survival benefits in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after NACT. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NACT followed by curative surgical resection between 2008 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors contributing to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 230 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR, 62–72 years) were included. All patients underwent curative surgical resection. Of these, 42% received neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX (96/230), 15% received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) (34/230), and 43% received gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) (100/230). In univariate analysis, lower College of American Pathologists (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) (0–1 vs. 2–3, median DFS: 29.8 vs. 14.2 months, p = 0.0081) and receipt of ACT (Yes vs. No, median DFS: 22.2 vs. 12.4 months, p < 0.0001) demonstrated significant associations with superior DFS. Multivariable analysis identified receipt of ACT as an independent predictor of superior DFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39–0.78, p = 0.0007) and OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33–0.71, p = 0.0002). However, the NACT regimen (mFOLFIRINOX vs. GEM-NAB) and the transition between neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (de-escalation vs. continuation vs. change) did not correlate with DFS or OS. The duration of perioperative chemotherapy showed a trend toward improved survival outcomes, though not statistically significant (6 months vs. <6 months: DFS, 19.4 vs. 16.2 months, p = 0.1448; OS, 49.6 vs. 30.4 months, p = 0.0623). In the following subgroup analyses, receipt of ACT provided DFS/OS benefits in patients who did not achieve a major pathologic response, pN0, or R0 resection (DFS: p = 0.0003; OS: p < 0.0001). However, it did not provide DFS/OS benefits in those who achieved a major pathologic response with pN0/R0 to NACT (DFS: p = 0.8036; OS: p = 0.1877). Conclusions: In resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma following NACT, receiving ACT was associated with favorable survival outcomes. Additional ACT appears to benefit patients who did not achieve a major pathologic response (pN0 or R0) to neoadjuvant therapy, with limited benefit for those who achieved a major response with pN0/R0. The specific NACT regimen (mFOLFIRINOX vs. GEM-NAB) and changes in ACT from NACT did not significantly influence survival outcomes in our cohort. Full article

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) exhibits variable survival outcomes based on tumor location, with pancreatic head cancer (PHC) and pancreatic body/tail cancer (PBTC) differing in prognosis and treatment response. This study investigates the correlation between tumor location and survival outcomes in PDAC patients treated with standard chemotherapy regimens. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 604 PDAC patients (400 PHC, 204 PBTC) diagnosed between January 2015 and May 2024 at Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center was conducted. Patients received either mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy. Clinical data, including demographics, tumor stage, treatment modalities, and molecular profiles, were extracted from electronic records. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified patient subgroups based on shared clinical, demographic, and survival characteristics. Results: PHC patients demonstrated superior median OS (12 months) compared to PBTC (9 months, p = 0.012) and PFS (8 months vs. 5 months, p = 0.0008). Across both subtypes, mFOLFIRINOX was associated with significantly longer OS than gem/nab-paclitaxel (PHC: 18.8 vs. 12.7 months, p < 0.0001; PBTC: 14 vs. 6 months, p = 0.011). LCA revealed distinct clusters: in PHC, a curative-intent class (median OS > 24 months) contrasted with a palliative class (<6 months); in PBTC, an aggressive treatment class (median OS > 18 months) differed from a limited treatment class (<6 months). Cluster differences were linked to treatment intensity, stage, and radiation use. Conclusions: PHC is associated with better survival outcomes than PBTC, with mFOLFIRINOX outperforming gem/nab-paclitaxel in both subtypes. LCA highlights heterogeneous patient subgroups, suggesting opportunities for personalized treatment strategies in PDAC management. Full article

The treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an unmet challenge, with the median overall survival rate remaining less than a year, even with the use of FOLFIRINOX-based therapies. This study analyzed archived macrophage-associated mRNA expression using datasets deposited in the UCSC Xena web platform to compare normal pancreatic tissue and PDAC tumor samples. The TGFB2 gene exhibited low mRNA expression levels in normal tissue, with less than one TPM. In contrast, in tumor tissue, TGFB2 expression levels exhibited a 7.9-fold increase in mRNA expression relative to normal tissue (p < 0.0001). Additionally, components of the type-I interferon signaling pathway exhibited significant upregulation of mRNA levels in tumor tissue, including Interferon alpha/beta receptor 1 (IFNAR1; 3.4-fold increase, p < 0.0001), Interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9; 4.2-fold increase, p < 0.0001), Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1; 7.1-fold increase, p < 0.0001), and Interferon Alpha Inducible Protein 27 (IFI27; 66.3-fold increase, p < 0.0001). We also utilized TCGA datasets deposited in cBioportal and KMplotter to relate mRNA expression levels to overall survival outcomes. These increased levels of mRNA expression were found to be prognostically significant, whereby patients with high expression levels of either TGFB2, IRF9, or IFI27 showed median OS times ranging from 16 to 20 months (p < 0.01 compared to 72 months for patients with low levels of expression for both TGFB2 and either IRF9 or IFI27). Examination of the KMplotter database determined the prognostic impact of TGFB2 mRNA expression levels by comparing patients expressing high versus low levels of TGFB2 (50th percentile cut-off) in low macrophage TME. In TME with low macrophage levels, patients with high levels of TGFB2 mRNA exhibited significantly shorter OS outcomes than patients with low TGFB2 mRNA levels (Median OS of 15.3 versus 72.7 months, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression models were applied to control for age at diagnosis. Nine genes exhibited significant increases in hazard ratios for TGFB2 mRNA expression, marker gene mRNA expression, and a significant interaction term between TGFB2 and marker gene expression (mRNA for markers: C1QA, CD74, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRB1, HLA-F, IFI27, IRF9, LGALS9, MARCO). The results of our study suggest that a combination of pharmacological tools can be used in treating PDAC patients, targeting both TGFB2 and the components of the type-I interferon signaling pathway. The significant statistical interaction between TGFB2 and the nine marker genes suggests that TGFB2 is a negative prognostic indicator at low levels of the IFN-I activated genes and TAM marker expression, including the immune checkpoint LGALS9 (upregulated 16.5-fold in tumor tissue; p < 0.0001). Full article

Background/Objectives: This nationwide population-based study investigated the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Data from the National Health Insurance Service linked to the Korea Central Cancer Registry were used. Patients with mPC receiving first-line chemotherapy (2012–2019) were included and followed up until 2020. The gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX groups were matched according to age, sex, and comorbidities. Results: In total, 8652 patients with mPC were treated with chemotherapy. GnP and FOLFIRINOX have been administered since 2016 and 2017, respectively. The median OS increased annually from 6 months in 2012–2013 to 10 months in 2018–2019. The median OSs in the GnP and FOLFIRINOX groups were significantly longer than those in patients receiving gemcitabine ± erlotinib. A total of 1134 patients from both the GnP and FOLFIRINOX groups were selected using propensity score matching. Before matching, the median OS was longer in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the GnP group (p = 0.0029). After matching, however, there was no significant difference in the median OS between the two groups (11 vs. 11 months, respectively, p = 0.2438). Conclusions: Patients with mPC receiving chemotherapy have shown improved OS since the introduction of GnP and FOLFIRINOX. After matching, OS did not differ between the GnP and FOLFIRINOX groups. Full article

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has recently gained prominence. We investigated the clinical significance of mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC), which exists in two major glycoforms, a less-glycosylated immature isoform (IM) and a heavily glycosylated mature isoform (MM), as a biomarker in resected PDA. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 100 resected PDAs to evaluate the expression of the IM and MM of MUC5AC using their respective monoclonal antibodies, CLH2 (NBP2-44455) and 45M1 (ab3649). MUC5AC localization (cytoplasmic, apical, and extra-cellular (EC)) was determined, and the H-scores were calculated. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 100 resected PDA patients, 43 received NAT, and 57 were treatment-naïve with upfront surgery (UpS). In the study population (n = 100), IM expression (H-scores for objective response vs. no response vs. UpS = 104 vs. 152 vs. 163, p = 0.01) and MM-MUC5AC detection rates (56% vs. 63% vs. 82%, p = 0.02) were significantly different. In the NAT group, MM-MUC5AC-negative patients had significantly better PFS according to the MVA (Hazard Ratio: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.059–0.766, p = 0.01). Similar results were noted in a FOLFIRINOX sub-group (n = 36). We established an association of MUC5AC expression with treatment response and outcomes. Full article

Pancreatic malignancy is the fourth cause of cancer-related death in Western countries and is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030. The standard therapies (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel) are not resolutive because this type of cancer is also characterized by a high chemoresistance, due in part to the activity of the ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) pumps accounting for the reduction in the intracellular concentration of the drugs. In this work, we analyze the occurrence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MDR-1 gene, in different pancreatic cancer cell lines, and in tissues from pancreatic cancer patients by DNA sequencing, as well as the expression levels of MDR-1 mRNA and protein, by qRT-PCR and Western Blot analysis. We found that gemcitabine-resistant cells, in conjunction with homozygosis of analyzed SNPs, showed high MDR-1 basal levels with further increases after gemcitabine treatment. Nevertheless, we did not observe in the human PDAC samples a correlation between the level of MDR-1 mRNA and protein expression and SNPs. Preliminary, we conclude that in our small cohort, these SNPs cannot be used as molecular markers for predicting the levels of MDR-1 mRNA/protein levels and drug responses in patients with PDAC. Full article