Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = long intracortical inhibition (LICI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
37 pages, 1276 KB  
Review
Versatility of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications
by Massimo Pascuzzi, Nika Naeini, Adam Dorich, Marco D’Angelo, Jiwon Kim, Jean-Francois Nankoo, Naaz Desai and Robert Chen
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010101 - 17 Jan 2026
Viewed by 536
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that utilizes magnetic fields to induce cortical electric currents, enabling both the measurement and modulation of neuronal activity. Initially developed as a diagnostic tool, TMS now serves dual roles in clinical neurology, offering insight [...] Read more.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that utilizes magnetic fields to induce cortical electric currents, enabling both the measurement and modulation of neuronal activity. Initially developed as a diagnostic tool, TMS now serves dual roles in clinical neurology, offering insight into neurophysiological dysfunctions and the therapeutic modulation of abnormal cortical excitability. This review examines key TMS outcome measures, including motor thresholds (MT), input–output (I/O) curves, cortical silent periods (CSP), and paired-pulse paradigms such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), intracortical facilitation (ICF), long interval cortical inhibition (LICI), interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). These biomarkers reflect underlying neurotransmitter systems and can aid in differentiating neurological conditions. Diagnostic applications of TMS are explored in Parkinson’s disease (PD), dystonia, essential tremor (ET), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Each condition displays characteristic neurophysiological profiles, highlighting the potential for TMS-derived biomarkers in early or differential diagnosis. Therapeutically, repetitive TMS (rTMS) has shown promise in modulating cortical circuits and improving motor and cognitive symptoms. High- and low-frequency stimulation protocols have demonstrated efficacy in PD, dystonia, ET, AD, and MCI, targeting the specific cortical regions implicated in each disorder. Moreover, the successful application of TMS in differentiating and treating AD and MCI underscores its clinical utility and translational potential across all neurodegenerative conditions. As research advances, increased attention and investment in TMS could facilitate similar diagnostic and therapeutic breakthroughs for other neurological disorders that currently lack robust tools for early detection and effective intervention. Moreover, this review also aims to underscore the importance of maintaining standardized TMS protocols. By highlighting inconsistencies and variability in outcomes across studies, we emphasize that careful methodological design is critical for ensuring the reproducibility, comparability, and reliable interpretation of TMS findings. In summary, this review emphasizes the value of TMS as a distinctive, non-invasive approach to probing brain function and highlights its considerable promise as both a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in neurology—roles that are often considered separately. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2124 KB  
Article
The Effect of 5G Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Exposure on Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
by Azadeh Torkan, Maryam Zoghi, Negin Foroughimehr and Shapour Jaberzadeh
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1134; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111134 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1323
Abstract
Background: Research on the impact of 5G mobile phone electromagnetic exposure on corticospinal excitability and intracortical mechanisms is still poorly understood. Objective: This randomized controlled pilot study explored the effects of 5G mobile phone exposure at 3.6 GHz (power density: 0.0030 W/m2 [...] Read more.
Background: Research on the impact of 5G mobile phone electromagnetic exposure on corticospinal excitability and intracortical mechanisms is still poorly understood. Objective: This randomized controlled pilot study explored the effects of 5G mobile phone exposure at 3.6 GHz (power density: 0.0030 W/m2) on corticospinal excitability and intracortical mechanisms in healthy adults. Methods: Nineteen healthy participants (mean age: 36.5 years) were exposed to 5G mobile phone exposure for 5 and 20 min, approximating the typical duration of a phone call. Corticospinal excitability, intracortical facilitation, short intracortical inhibition, and long intracortical inhibition using single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed before and immediately after exposure were performed. Results: A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no significant interactions between exposure condition (5 min, 20 min, sham) and time (pre vs. post) for CSE, ICF, SICI, or LICI (all p > 0.15). Bayesian analyses yielded Bayes factors close to 1, indicating inconclusive evidence for both the null and alternative hypotheses. Conclusion: Short-term exposure to 5G mobile phone electromagnetic fields did not produce detectable changes in corticospinal or intracortical excitability. Bayesian evidence was similarly inconclusive (Bayes factors ≈ 1), suggesting that the data provide limited support for either the presence or absence of a detectable effect. Any potential influence of 5G exposure on neural function is therefore likely to be subtle with the present methods. As a pilot study, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and underscore the need for further research using more sensitive outcome measures, extended exposure durations, and vulnerable populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurotechnology and Neuroimaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 652 KB  
Systematic Review
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Diagnostic Tool in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
by Elisa Dognini, Simona Finazzi, Elena Campana, Rosa Manenti, Maria Cotelli and Barbara Borroni
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(9), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090969 - 9 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1461
Abstract
Background/Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often represents the prodromal stage of neurodegenerative dementia. Identification of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other dementias in the MCI stage is essential for early intervention. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained interest as a non-invasive method to [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often represents the prodromal stage of neurodegenerative dementia. Identification of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other dementias in the MCI stage is essential for early intervention. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained interest as a non-invasive method to evaluate cortical excitability and neurotransmitter function. This systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic utility of TMS-derived indices, such as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) in MCI populations. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, 14 studies were selected, encompassing 476 MCI patients. Reported outcomes related to TMS measures (SAI, SICI, ICF, LICI) were reviewed across various MCI phenotypes. Results: Most studies report reduced SAI, a marker of cholinergic dysfunction, in amnestic MCI and MCI due to AD. Alterations in SICI and ICF, markers of GABAergic and glutamatergic dysfunction, were more variable, mainly observed in MCI of non-AD type. LICI showed no consistent changes. One study demonstrated increased clinicians’ diagnostic confidence when TMS data were incorporated. Conclusions: TMS measures hold promise as a non-invasive tool for early and differential diagnosis of MCI. Further standardized and longitudinal research is needed to confirm its clinical applicability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1459 KB  
Article
Dietary Cocoa Flavanols Do Not Alter Brain Excitability in Young Healthy Adults
by Raphael Hamel, Rebecca Oyler, Evie Harms, Rosamond Bailey, Catarina Rendeiro and Ned Jenkinson
Nutrients 2024, 16(7), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070969 - 27 Mar 2024
Viewed by 7496
Abstract
The ingestion of dietary cocoa flavanols acutely alters functions of the cerebral endothelium, but whether the effects of flavanols permeate beyond this to alter other brain functions remains unclear. Based on converging evidence, this work tested the hypothesis that cocoa flavanols would alter [...] Read more.
The ingestion of dietary cocoa flavanols acutely alters functions of the cerebral endothelium, but whether the effects of flavanols permeate beyond this to alter other brain functions remains unclear. Based on converging evidence, this work tested the hypothesis that cocoa flavanols would alter brain excitability in young healthy adults. In a randomised, cross-over, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess corticospinal and intracortical excitability before as well as 1 and 2 h post-ingestion of a beverage containing either high (695 mg flavanols, 150 mg (−)-epicatechin) or low levels (5 mg flavanols, 0 mg (−)-epicatechin) of cocoa flavanols. In addition to this acute intervention, the effects of a short-term chronic intervention where the same cocoa flavanol doses were ingested once a day for 5 consecutive days were also investigated. For both the acute and chronic interventions, the results revealed no robust alteration in corticospinal or intracortical excitability. One possibility is that cocoa flavanols yield no net effect on brain excitability, but predominantly alter functions of the cerebral endothelium in young healthy adults. Future studies should increase intervention durations to maximize the acute and chronic accumulation of flavanols in the brain, and further investigate if cocoa flavanols would be more effective at altering brain excitability in older adults and clinical populations than in younger adults. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemicals and Human Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 560 KB  
Article
Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition and the Cortical Silent Period in Youth
by Kelly B. Ahern, Juan F. Garzon, Deniz Yuruk, Maria Saliba, Can Ozger, Jennifer L. Vande Voort and Paul E. Croarkin
Biomedicines 2023, 11(2), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020409 - 30 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3011
Abstract
Background: The cortical silent period (CSP) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) are putative markers of γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type B (GABAB)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission. We aimed to assess the association between LICI and CSP in youths. Methods: We analyzed data from three [...] Read more.
Background: The cortical silent period (CSP) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) are putative markers of γ-aminobutyric acid receptor type B (GABAB)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission. We aimed to assess the association between LICI and CSP in youths. Methods: We analyzed data from three previous studies of youth who underwent CSP and LICI measurements with transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography. We assessed CSP and LICI association using Spearman rank correlation tests and multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: The sample included 16 healthy participants and 45 participants with depression. The general mean (SD) age was 15.5 (1.7), 14.3 (1.7) for healthy participants, and 15.9 (1.6) years for participants with depression. Measures were nonnormally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk, p < 0.001). CSP and LICI were not correlated at 100-millisecond (ρ = −0.2421, p = 0.06), 150-millisecond (ρ = −0.1612, p = 0.21), or 200-millisecond (ρ = −0.0507, p = 0.70) interstimulus intervals using Spearman rank correlation test. No correlations were found in the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.35). Conclusions: Although previous studies suggest that cortical silent period and long-interval intracortical inhibition measure GABAB receptor-mediated activity, these biomarkers were not associated in our sample of youths. Future studies should focus on the specific physiologic and pharmacodynamic properties assessed by CSP and LICI in younger populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Brain Stimulation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop