Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = intracortical brain–computer interface

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
46 pages, 1676 KB  
Review
Neural–Computer Interfaces: Theory, Practice, Perspectives
by Ignat Dubynin, Maxim Zemlyanskov, Irina Shalayeva, Oleg Gorskii, Vladimir Grinevich and Pavel Musienko
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(16), 8900; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168900 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 4605
Abstract
This review outlines the technological principles of neural–computer interface (NCI) construction, classifying them according to: (1) the degree of intervention (invasive, semi-invasive, and non-invasive); (2) the direction of signal communication, including BCI (brain–computer interface) for converting neural activity into commands for external devices, [...] Read more.
This review outlines the technological principles of neural–computer interface (NCI) construction, classifying them according to: (1) the degree of intervention (invasive, semi-invasive, and non-invasive); (2) the direction of signal communication, including BCI (brain–computer interface) for converting neural activity into commands for external devices, CBI (computer–brain interface) for translating artificial signals into stimuli for the CNS, and BBI (brain–brain interface) for direct brain-to-brain interaction systems that account for agency; and (3) the mode of user interaction with technology (active, reactive, passive). For each NCI type, we detail the fundamental data processing principles, covering signal registration, digitization, preprocessing, classification, encoding, command execution, and stimulation, alongside engineering implementations ranging from EEG/MEG to intracortical implants and from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). We also review mathematical modeling methods for NCIs, focusing on optimizing the extraction of informative features from neural signals—decoding for BCI and encoding for CBI—followed by a discussion of quasi-real-time operation and the use of DSP and neuromorphic chips. Quantitative metrics and rehabilitation measures for evaluating NCI system effectiveness are considered. Finally, we highlight promising future research directions, such as the development of electrochemical interfaces, biomimetic hierarchical systems, and energy-efficient technologies capable of expanding brain functionality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain-Computer Interfaces: Development, Applications, and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1646 KB  
Review
Invasive Brain–Computer Interface for Communication: A Scoping Review
by Shujhat Khan, Leonie Kallis, Harry Mee, Salim El Hadwe, Damiano Barone, Peter Hutchinson and Angelos Kolias
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(4), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040336 - 24 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4592
Abstract
Background: The rapid expansion of the brain–computer interface for patients with neurological deficits has garnered significant interest, and for patients, it provides an additional route where conventional rehabilitation has its limits. This has particularly been the case for patients who lose the ability [...] Read more.
Background: The rapid expansion of the brain–computer interface for patients with neurological deficits has garnered significant interest, and for patients, it provides an additional route where conventional rehabilitation has its limits. This has particularly been the case for patients who lose the ability to communicate. Circumventing neural injuries by recording from the intact cortex and subcortex has the potential to allow patients to communicate and restore self-expression. Discoveries over the last 10–15 years have been possible through advancements in technology, neuroscience, and computing. By examining studies involving intracranial brain–computer interfaces that aim to restore communication, we aimed to explore the advances made and explore where the technology is heading. Methods: For this scoping review, we systematically searched PubMed and OVID Embase. After processing the articles, the search yielded 41 articles that we included in this review. Results: The articles predominantly assessed patients who had either suffered from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cervical cord injury, or brainstem stroke, resulting in tetraplegia and, in some cases, difficulty speaking. Of the intracranial implants, ten had ALS, six had brainstem stroke, and thirteen had a spinal cord injury. Stereoelectroencephalography was also used, but the results, whilst promising, are still in their infancy. Studies involving patients who were moving cursors on a screen could improve the speed of movement by optimising the interface and utilising better decoding methods. In recent years, intracortical devices have been successfully used for accurate speech-to-text and speech-to-audio decoding in patients who are unable to speak. Conclusions: Here, we summarise the progress made by BCIs used for communication. Speech decoding directly from the cortex can provide a novel therapeutic method to restore full, embodied communication to patients suffering from tetraplegia who otherwise cannot communicate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Clinical Technologies in Treating Neurosurgical Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3303 KB  
Article
Comparison of Subdural and Intracortical Recordings of Somatosensory Evoked Responses
by Felipe Rettore Andreis, Suzan Meijs, Thomas Gomes Nørgaard dos Santos Nielsen, Taha Al Muhamadee Janjua and Winnie Jensen
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 6847; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216847 - 25 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1737
Abstract
Micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) electrodes have emerged to balance the trade-off between invasiveness and signal quality in brain recordings. However, its large-scale applicability is still hindered by a lack of comparative studies assessing the relationship between ECoG and traditional recording methods such as penetrating electrodes. [...] Read more.
Micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) electrodes have emerged to balance the trade-off between invasiveness and signal quality in brain recordings. However, its large-scale applicability is still hindered by a lack of comparative studies assessing the relationship between ECoG and traditional recording methods such as penetrating electrodes. This study aimed to compare somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) through the lenses of a µECoG and an intracortical microelectrode array (MEA). The electrodes were implanted in the pig’s primary somatosensory cortex, while SEPs were generated by applying electrical stimulation to the ulnar nerve. The SEP amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), power spectral density (PSD), and correlation structure were analysed. Overall, SEPs resulting from MEA recordings had higher amplitudes and contained significantly more spectral power, especially at higher frequencies. However, the SNRs were similar between the interfaces. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using µECoG to decode SEPs with wide-range applications in physiology monitoring and brain–computer interfaces. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 15261 KB  
Article
Real-Time Home Automation System Using BCI Technology
by Marius-Valentin Drăgoi, Ionuț Nisipeanu, Aurel Frimu, Ana-Maria Tălîngă, Anton Hadăr, Tiberiu Gabriel Dobrescu, Cosmin Petru Suciu and Andrei Rareș Manea
Biomimetics 2024, 9(10), 594; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9100594 - 1 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3137
Abstract
A Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) processes and converts brain signals to provide commands to output devices to carry out certain tasks. The main purpose of BCIs is to replace or restore the missing or damaged functions of disabled people, including in neuromuscular disorders like [...] Read more.
A Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) processes and converts brain signals to provide commands to output devices to carry out certain tasks. The main purpose of BCIs is to replace or restore the missing or damaged functions of disabled people, including in neuromuscular disorders like Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), cerebral palsy, stroke, or spinal cord injury. Hence, a BCI does not use neuromuscular output pathways; it bypasses traditional neuromuscular pathways by directly interpreting brain signals to command devices. Scientists have used several techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) and intracortical and electrocorticographic (ECoG) techniques to collect brain signals that are used to control robotic arms, prosthetics, wheelchairs, and several other devices. A non-invasive method of EEG is used for collecting and monitoring the signals of the brain. Implementing EEG-based BCI technology in home automation systems may facilitate a wide range of tasks for people with disabilities. It is important to assist and empower individuals with paralysis to engage with existing home automation systems and gadgets in this particular situation. This paper proposes a home security system to control a door and a light using an EEG-based BCI. The system prototype consists of the EMOTIV Insight™ headset, Raspberry Pi 4, a servo motor to open/close the door, and an LED. The system can be very helpful for disabled people, including arm amputees who cannot close or open doors or use a remote control to turn on or turn off lights. The system includes an application made in Flutter to receive notifications on a smartphone related to the status of the door and the LEDs. The disabled person can control the door as well as the LED using his/her brain signals detected by the EMOTIV Insight™ headset. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Inspired Mechanical Design and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3075 KB  
Article
Antioxidant Dimethyl Fumarate Temporarily but Not Chronically Improves Intracortical Microelectrode Performance
by George F. Hoeferlin, Tejas Bajwa, Hannah Olivares, Jichu Zhang, Lindsey N. Druschel, Brandon S. Sturgill, Michael Sobota, Pierce Boucher, Jonathan Duncan, Ana G. Hernandez-Reynoso, Stuart F. Cogan, Joseph J. Pancrazio and Jeffrey R. Capadona
Micromachines 2023, 14(10), 1902; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14101902 - 4 Oct 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3028
Abstract
Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) can be used in a range of applications, from basic neuroscience research to providing an intimate interface with the brain as part of a brain-computer interface (BCI) system aimed at restoring function for people living with neurological disorders or [...] Read more.
Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) can be used in a range of applications, from basic neuroscience research to providing an intimate interface with the brain as part of a brain-computer interface (BCI) system aimed at restoring function for people living with neurological disorders or injuries. Unfortunately, MEAs tend to fail prematurely, leading to a loss in functionality for many applications. An important contributing factor in MEA failure is oxidative stress resulting from chronically inflammatory-activated microglia and macrophages releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) around the implant site. Antioxidants offer a means for mitigating oxidative stress and improving tissue health and MEA performance. Here, we investigate using the clinically available antioxidant dimethyl fumarate (DMF) to reduce the neuroinflammatory response and improve MEA performance in a rat MEA model. Daily treatment of DMF for 16 weeks resulted in a significant improvement in the recording capabilities of MEA devices during the sub-chronic (Weeks 5–11) phase (42% active electrode yield vs. 35% for control). However, these sub-chronic improvements were lost in the chronic implantation phase, as a more exacerbated neuroinflammatory response occurs in DMF-treated animals by 16 weeks post-implantation. Yet, neuroinflammation was indiscriminate between treatment and control groups during the sub-chronic phase. Although worse for chronic use, a temporary improvement (<12 weeks) in MEA performance is meaningful. Providing short-term improvement to MEA devices using DMF can allow for improved use for limited-duration studies. Further efforts should be taken to explore the mechanism behind a worsened neuroinflammatory response at the 16-week time point for DMF-treated animals and assess its usefulness for specific applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flexible and Wearable Sensors, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3389 KB  
Article
Fabrication Methods and Chronic In Vivo Validation of Mechanically Adaptive Microfluidic Intracortical Devices
by Youjoung Kim, Natalie N. Mueller, William E. Schwartzman, Danielle Sarno, Reagan Wynder, George F. Hoeferlin, Kaela Gisser, Jeffrey R. Capadona and Allison Hess-Dunning
Micromachines 2023, 14(5), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14051015 - 9 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3361
Abstract
Intracortical neural probes are both a powerful tool in basic neuroscience studies of brain function and a critical component of brain computer interfaces (BCIs) designed to restore function to paralyzed patients. Intracortical neural probes can be used both to detect neural activity at [...] Read more.
Intracortical neural probes are both a powerful tool in basic neuroscience studies of brain function and a critical component of brain computer interfaces (BCIs) designed to restore function to paralyzed patients. Intracortical neural probes can be used both to detect neural activity at single unit resolution and to stimulate small populations of neurons with high resolution. Unfortunately, intracortical neural probes tend to fail at chronic timepoints in large part due to the neuroinflammatory response that follows implantation and persistent dwelling in the cortex. Many promising approaches are under development to circumvent the inflammatory response, including the development of less inflammatory materials/device designs and the delivery of antioxidant or anti-inflammatory therapies. Here, we report on our recent efforts to integrate the neuroprotective effects of both a dynamically softening polymer substrate designed to minimize tissue strain and localized drug delivery at the intracortical neural probe/tissue interface through the incorporation of microfluidic channels within the probe. The fabrication process and device design were both optimized with respect to the resulting device mechanical properties, stability, and microfluidic functionality. The optimized devices were successfully able to deliver an antioxidant solution throughout a six-week in vivo rat study. Histological data indicated that a multi-outlet design was most effective at reducing markers of inflammation. The ability to reduce inflammation through a combined approach of drug delivery and soft materials as a platform technology allows future studies to explore additional therapeutics to further enhance intracortical neural probes performance and longevity for clinical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress and Challenges of Implantable Neural Interfaces)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3503 KB  
Article
Selection of Essential Neural Activity Timesteps for Intracortical Brain–Computer Interface Based on Recurrent Neural Network
by Shih-Hung Yang, Jyun-We Huang, Chun-Jui Huang, Po-Hsiung Chiu, Hsin-Yi Lai and You-Yin Chen
Sensors 2021, 21(19), 6372; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196372 - 24 Sep 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3306
Abstract
Intracortical brain–computer interfaces (iBCIs) translate neural activity into control commands, thereby allowing paralyzed persons to control devices via their brain signals. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are widely used as neural decoders because they can learn neural response dynamics from continuous neural activity. Nevertheless, [...] Read more.
Intracortical brain–computer interfaces (iBCIs) translate neural activity into control commands, thereby allowing paralyzed persons to control devices via their brain signals. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are widely used as neural decoders because they can learn neural response dynamics from continuous neural activity. Nevertheless, excessively long or short input neural activity for an RNN may decrease its decoding performance. Based on the temporal attention module exploiting relations in features over time, we propose a temporal attention-aware timestep selection (TTS) method that improves the interpretability of the salience of each timestep in an input neural activity. Furthermore, TTS determines the appropriate input neural activity length for accurate neural decoding. Experimental results show that the proposed TTS efficiently selects 28 essential timesteps for RNN-based neural decoders, outperforming state-of-the-art neural decoders on two nonhuman primate datasets (R2=0.76±0.05 for monkey Indy and CC=0.91±0.01 for monkey N). In addition, it reduces the computation time for offline training (reducing 5–12%) and online prediction (reducing 16–18%). When visualizing the attention mechanism in TTS, the preparatory neural activity is consecutively highlighted during arm movement, and the most recent neural activity is highlighted during the resting state in nonhuman primates. Selecting only a few essential timesteps for an RNN-based neural decoder provides sufficient decoding performance and requires only a short computation time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain–Computer Interfaces: Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5718 KB  
Article
FPGA Design Integration of a 32-Microelectrodes Low-Latency Spike Detector in a Commercial System for Intracortical Recordings
by Mattia Tambaro, Marta Bisio, Marta Maschietto, Alessandro Leparulo and Stefano Vassanelli
Digital 2021, 1(1), 34-53; https://doi.org/10.3390/digital1010003 - 30 Jan 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5621
Abstract
Numerous experiments require low latencies in the detection and processing of the neural brain activity to be feasible, in the order of a few milliseconds from action to reaction. In this paper, a design for sub-millisecond detection and communication of the spiking activity [...] Read more.
Numerous experiments require low latencies in the detection and processing of the neural brain activity to be feasible, in the order of a few milliseconds from action to reaction. In this paper, a design for sub-millisecond detection and communication of the spiking activity detected by an array of 32 intracortical microelectrodes is presented, exploiting the real-time processing provided by Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). The design is embedded in the commercially available RHS stimulation/recording controller from Intan Technologies, that allows recording intracortical signals and performing IntraCortical MicroStimulation (ICMS). The Spike Detector (SD) is based on the Smoothed Nonlinear Energy Operator (SNEO) and includes a novel approach to estimate an RMS-based firing-rate-independent threshold, that can be tuned to fine detect both the single Action Potential (AP) and Multi Unit Activity (MUA). A low-latency SD together with the ICMS capability, creates a powerful tool for Brain-Computer-Interface (BCI) closed-loop experiments relying on the neuronal activity-dependent stimulation. The design also includes: A third order Butterworth high-pass IIR filter and a Savitzky-Golay polynomial fitting; a privileged fast USB connection to stream the detected spikes to a host computer and a sub-milliseconds latency Universal Asynchronous Receiver-Transmitter (UART) protocol communication to send detections and receive ICMS triggers. The source code and the instruction of the project can be found on GitHub. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1635 KB  
Review
Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography
by Mehdi Shokoueinejad, Dong-Wook Park, Yei Hwan Jung, Sarah K. Brodnick, Joseph Novello, Aaron Dingle, Kyle I. Swanson, Dong-Hyun Baek, Aaron J. Suminski, Wendell B. Lake, Zhenqiang Ma and Justin Williams
Micromachines 2019, 10(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010062 - 17 Jan 2019
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 11531
Abstract
Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies. Miniaturized implantable µECoG devices have [...] Read more.
Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain–computer interface (BCI) technologies. Miniaturized implantable µECoG devices have the advantage of providing greater-density neural signal acquisition and stimulation capabilities in a minimally invasive fashion. An increased spatial resolution of the µECoG array will be useful for greater specificity diagnosis and treatment of neuronal diseases and the advancement of basic neuroscience and BCI research. In this review, recent achievements of ECoG and µECoG are discussed. The electrode configurations and varying material choices used to design µECoG arrays are discussed, including advantages and disadvantages of µECoG technology compared to electroencephalography (EEG), ECoG, and intracortical electrode arrays. Electrode materials that are the primary focus include platinum, iridium oxide, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), indium tin oxide (ITO), and graphene. We discuss the biological immune response to µECoG devices compared to other electrode array types, the role of µECoG in clinical pathology, and brain–computer interface technology. The information presented in this review will be helpful to understand the current status, organize available knowledge, and guide future clinical and research applications of µECoG technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neural Microelectrodes: Design and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2873 KB  
Article
A Wireless 32-Channel Implantable Bidirectional Brain Machine Interface
by Yi Su, Sudhamayee Routhu, Kee S. Moon, Sung Q. Lee, WooSub Youm and Yusuf Ozturk
Sensors 2016, 16(10), 1582; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101582 - 24 Sep 2016
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 9747
Abstract
All neural information systems (NIS) rely on sensing neural activity to supply commands and control signals for computers, machines and a variety of prosthetic devices. Invasive systems achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by eliminating the volume conduction problems caused by tissue and [...] Read more.
All neural information systems (NIS) rely on sensing neural activity to supply commands and control signals for computers, machines and a variety of prosthetic devices. Invasive systems achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by eliminating the volume conduction problems caused by tissue and bone. An implantable brain machine interface (BMI) using intracortical electrodes provides excellent detection of a broad range of frequency oscillatory activities through the placement of a sensor in direct contact with cortex. This paper introduces a compact-sized implantable wireless 32-channel bidirectional brain machine interface (BBMI) to be used with freely-moving primates. The system is designed to monitor brain sensorimotor rhythms and present current stimuli with a configurable duration, frequency and amplitude in real time to the brain based on the brain activity report. The battery is charged via a novel ultrasonic wireless power delivery module developed for efficient delivery of power into a deeply-implanted system. The system was successfully tested through bench tests and in vivo tests on a behaving primate to record the local field potential (LFP) oscillation and stimulate the target area at the same time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensing Technology for Healthcare System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop