Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (955)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = immune-based combination therapies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 1808 KB  
Review
Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Emerging Roles of Monoclonal Antibodies and Immune Modulation
by Stephanie Figueroa, Niradiz Reyes, Raj K. Tiwari and Jan Geliebter
Cancers 2026, 18(3), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030412 (registering DOI) - 28 Jan 2026
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and clinically challenging subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression. This molecular phenotype narrows the availability of targeted therapies and contributes to high rates of early relapse, [...] Read more.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and clinically challenging subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression. This molecular phenotype narrows the availability of targeted therapies and contributes to high rates of early relapse, therapeutic resistance, and poor clinical outcomes. Mounting evidence pinpoints the tumor microenvironment (TME) as a central driver of TNBC progression, immune evasion, and resistance to treatment. The TME encompasses a complex and dynamic network of immune and stromal cells, extracellular matrix components, and soluble mediators that collectively shape tumor behavior and influence therapeutic response. Notably, TNBC often displays an immunologically active microenvironment, marked by high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression, opening a window for immune-based therapeutic strategies. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the cellular, molecular, and structural features of the TNBC tumor microenvironment, with particular focus on immunosuppressive mechanisms mediated by tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and dysfunctional T cells. We describe the clinical development and therapeutic impact of monoclonal antibodies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody–drug conjugates. Additionally, we discuss strategies aimed at modulating the TME to enhance monoclonal antibody efficacy, including immune cell reprogramming, extracellular matrix remodeling, cytokine/chemokine blockade, and combination treatment strategies. Finally, we highlight the role of biomarker-driven patient stratification and personalized therapeutic strategies, addressing current challenges and future directions in TME-targeted drug development. Together, these insights underscore the potential of integrating immune modulation and monoclonal antibody-based therapies to improve outcomes for TNBC patients. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 831 KB  
Review
From Inflammation to Thrombosis: The Prothrombotic State and Cardiovascular Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
by Vlad Dumitru Brata, Dana Alina Crisan, Angela Cozma, Cezara-Andreea Gerdanovics, Stefan Lucian Popa, Mircea Vasile Milaciu and Olga Hilda Orășan
Medicina 2026, 62(2), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62020270 - 27 Jan 2026
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) and a moderate risk of arterial cardiovascular events. This varies with inflammatory activity and acute-care exposure, with pathophysiological data supporting a thromboinflammatory phenotype in which intestinal inflammation influences [...] Read more.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) and a moderate risk of arterial cardiovascular events. This varies with inflammatory activity and acute-care exposure, with pathophysiological data supporting a thromboinflammatory phenotype in which intestinal inflammation influences systemic vascular homeostasis through innate immune activation, coagulation–platelet crosstalk, endothelial dysfunction, impaired fibrinolysis, and immunothrombosis. Clinically, prevention and management should be integrated into routine care and anchored in sustained, steroid-sparing disease control, combined with guideline-based in-hospital thromboprophylaxis and standard cardiovascular prevention. Decisions regarding anticoagulant therapy after VTEs should follow established principles while recognizing that recurrence prevention depends not only on anticoagulant choice but also on minimizing repeated inflammatory and treatment-related risk exposures. Cardiovascular risk assessment and optimization of modifiable factors should be considered before therapy escalation or treatment switching. Future advances will likely come from more personalized risk assessment across dynamic high-risk windows and from adjunctive, mechanism-informed strategies targeting key nodes of the gut–vascular interface and immunothrombosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 779 KB  
Review
Does the B7-H3 Immune Checkpoint Have High Potential as a Therapeutic Target?
by Marco Agostini, Pietro Traldi and Mahmoud Hamdan
Cells 2026, 15(3), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15030239 - 26 Jan 2026
Abstract
B7-H3 (CD276), a member of the B7 family of proteins, is known to play a key role in the progression of a number of cancers. This protein is selectively expressed in both tumor cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Various investigations, [...] Read more.
B7-H3 (CD276), a member of the B7 family of proteins, is known to play a key role in the progression of a number of cancers. This protein is selectively expressed in both tumor cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Various investigations, including a number of clinical trials, have reported high levels of expression of this protein in cancerous tissues compared to their healthy counterparts. This difference in expression attracted various research efforts to establish whether such a difference can be linked to the therapeutic potential of this molecule. It is worth noting that B7-H3 is not the only immune checkpoint expressed at different levels in cancerous and healthy cells. Therapeutic strategies, based on different levels of expression, have been tested with other checkpoints. To inhibit the expression of some checkpoints, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were developed. The introduction of these inhibitors for the treatment of some forms of advanced-stage tumors has been justly described as an important milestone in the landscape of immune therapy. Years after the launch of these inhibitors, numerous clinical trials revealed that these inhibitors benefit a narrow subset of patients suffering from advanced-stage tumors, while the majority of patients treated with these inhibitors either did not respond positively or simply did not respond at all (refractory patients). Other clinical trials showed that this form of treatment can provoke serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). It is fair to state that changes in the expression level of a given protein in diseased tissue is an important parameter to take into account in the assessment of such a protein as a therapeutic target. However, the last ten years have demonstrated that taking the level of expression of a given checkpoint within a cancerous tissue is not sufficient to consider such expression a reliable predictive biomarker for the investigated disease. On the other hand, to establish a solid base for a given therapeutic strategy, these varying levels of expression have to be combined with a deep understanding of the biology of the molecule under investigation, as well as the identification and thorough analysis of the relevant signaling pathways, particularly those communicating with both the investigated molecule and the immune system. Recently, a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms have suggested that B7-H3 is a highly promising therapeutic target for the development of immune therapeutics. In this review, we ask why hopes of better therapeutic performance are attached to this immune checkpoint. A partial answer to this question is provided through the careful consideration of the available data generated by various clinical trials. The contribution of mass spectrometry-based proteomics to this area of research is highlighted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 948 KB  
Review
A Decade of Innovation in Breast Cancer (2015–2025): A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials, Targeted Therapies and Molecular Perspectives
by Klaudia Dynarowicz, Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher, Sara Czech, Aleksandra Kawczyk-Krupka and David Aebisher
Cancers 2026, 18(3), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030361 - 23 Jan 2026
Viewed by 181
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed an unprecedented transformation in breast cancer management, driven by parallel advances in targeted therapies, immunomodulation, drug-delivery technologies, and molecular diagnostic tools. This review summarizes the key achievements of 2015–2025, encompassing all major biological subtypes of breast cancer as [...] Read more.
The past decade has witnessed an unprecedented transformation in breast cancer management, driven by parallel advances in targeted therapies, immunomodulation, drug-delivery technologies, and molecular diagnostic tools. This review summarizes the key achievements of 2015–2025, encompassing all major biological subtypes of breast cancer as well as technological innovations with substantial clinical relevance. In hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2− disease, the integration of CDK4/6 inhibitors, modulators of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERDs), and real-time monitoring of Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations has enabled clinicians to overcome endocrine resistance and dynamically tailor treatment based on evolving molecular alterations detected in circulating biomarkers. In HER2-positive breast cancer, treatment paradigms have been revolutionized by next-generation antibody–drug conjugates, advanced antibody formats, and technologies facilitating drug penetration across the blood–brain barrier, collectively improving systemic and central nervous system disease control. The most rapid progress has occurred in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), where synergistic strategies combining selective cytotoxicity via Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs), DNA damage response inhibitors, immunotherapy, epigenetic modulation, and therapies targeting immunometabolic pathways have markedly expanded therapeutic opportunities for this historically challenging subtype. In parallel, photodynamic therapy has emerged as an investigational and predominantly local phototheranostic approach, incorporating nanocarriers, next-generation photosensitizers, and photoimmunotherapy capable of inducing immunogenic cell death and modulating antitumor immune responses. A defining feature of the past decade has been the surge in patent-driven innovation, encompassing multispecific antibodies, optimized ADC architectures, novel linker–payload designs, and advanced nanotechnological and photoactive delivery systems. By integrating data from clinical trials, molecular analyses, and patent landscapes, this review illustrates how multimechanistic, biomarker-guided therapies supported by advanced drug-delivery technologies are redefining contemporary precision oncology in breast cancer. The emerging therapeutic paradigm underscores the convergence of targeted therapy, immunomodulation, synthetic lethality, and localized immune-activating approaches, charting a path toward further personalization of treatment in the years ahead. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
12 pages, 949 KB  
Perspective
An Integrative Roadmap for Advancing Colorectal Cancer Organoid
by Youqing Zhu, Ke He and Zhi Shi
Biomedicines 2026, 14(1), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010248 - 22 Jan 2026
Viewed by 97
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Compared with traditional two-dimensional (2D) models, patient-derived CRC organoids more faithfully preserve the genomic, transcriptomic, and architectural features of primary tumors, making them a powerful intermediate platform bridging basic discovery [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Compared with traditional two-dimensional (2D) models, patient-derived CRC organoids more faithfully preserve the genomic, transcriptomic, and architectural features of primary tumors, making them a powerful intermediate platform bridging basic discovery and clinical translation. Over the past several years, organoid systems have rapidly expanded beyond conventional epithelial-only cultures toward increasingly complex architectures, including immune-organoid co-culture models and mini-colon systems that enable long-term, spatially resolved tracking of tumor evolution. These advanced platforms, combined with high-throughput technologies and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based functional genomics, have substantially enhanced our ability to dissect CRC mechanisms, identify therapeutic vulnerabilities, and evaluate drug responses in a physiologically relevant context. However, current models still face critical limitations, such as the lack of systemic physiology (e.g., gut–liver or gut–brain axes), limited standardization across platforms, and the need for large-scale, prospective clinical validation. These gaps highlight an urgent need for next-generation platforms and computational frameworks. The development of high-throughput multi-omics, CRISPR-based perturbation, drug screening technologies, and artificial intelligence-driven predictive approaches will offer a promising avenue to address these challenges, accelerating mechanistic studies of CRC, enabling personalized therapy, and facilitating clinical translation. In this perspective, we propose a roadmap for CRC organoid research centered on two major technical pillars: advanced organoid platforms, including immune co-culture and mini-colon systems, and mechanistic investigations leveraging multi-omics and CRISPR-based functional genomics. We then discuss translational applications, such as high-throughput drug screening, and highlight emerging computational and translational strategies that may support future clinical validation and precision medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3536 KB  
Review
Extracellular Matrix in Human Disease and Therapy: From Pathogenic Remodeling to Biomaterial Platforms and Precision Diagnostics
by Jun-Hyeog Jang
Biomedicines 2026, 14(1), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010247 - 21 Jan 2026
Viewed by 124
Abstract
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a dynamic, tissue-specific network that integrates biochemical and mechanical cues to regulate cell behavior and organ homeostasis. Increasing evidence indicates that dysregulated ECM remodeling is an upstream driver of chronic human diseases rather than a passive consequence of [...] Read more.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a dynamic, tissue-specific network that integrates biochemical and mechanical cues to regulate cell behavior and organ homeostasis. Increasing evidence indicates that dysregulated ECM remodeling is an upstream driver of chronic human diseases rather than a passive consequence of injury. This review summarizes principles of ECM organization, mechanotransduction, and pathological remodeling and highlights translational opportunities for ECM-targeted therapies, biomaterial platforms, and precision diagnostics. We conducted a narrative synthesis of foundational and recent literature covering ECM composition and turnover, stiffness-dependent signaling, and disease-associated remodeling across fibrosis/cardiovascular disease, cancer, and metabolic disorders, together with advances in ECM-based biomaterials, drug delivery, and ECMderived biomarkers and imaging. Across organs, a self-reinforcing cycle of altered matrix composition, excessive crosslinking, and stiffness-dependent mechanotransduction (including integrin–FAK and YAP/TAZ pathways) sustains fibroinflammation, myofibroblast persistence, and progressive tissue dysfunction. In tumors, aligned and crosslinked ECM promotes invasion, immune evasion, and therapy resistance while also shaping perfusion and drug penetration. Translational strategies increasingly focus on modulating ECM synthesis and crosslinking, normalizing rather than ablating matrix architecture, and targeting ECM–cell signaling axes in combination with anti-fibrotic, cytotoxic, or immunotherapeutic regimens. ECM biology provides a unifying framework linking pathogenesis, therapy, and precision diagnostics across chronic diseases. Clinical translation will benefit from standardized quantitative measures of matrix remodeling, mechanism-based biomarkers of ECM turnover, and integrative imaging–omics approaches for patient stratification and treatment monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Biology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

35 pages, 1837 KB  
Review
Beyond Transplantation: Engineering Neural Cell Therapies and Combination Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair
by Lyandysha V. Zholudeva, Dennis Bourbeau, Adam Hall, Victoria Spruance, Victor Ogbolu, Liang Qiang, Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert and Michael A. Lane
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(1), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010113 - 21 Jan 2026
Viewed by 196
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the most formidable challenges in regenerative medicine, often resulting in permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic function. Cell-based therapies offer a promising path toward repair by providing donor neurons and glia capable of integrating into [...] Read more.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the most formidable challenges in regenerative medicine, often resulting in permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic function. Cell-based therapies offer a promising path toward repair by providing donor neurons and glia capable of integrating into host circuits, modulating the injury environment, and restoring function. Early studies employing fetal neural tissue and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) have demonstrated proof-of-principle for survival, differentiation, and synaptic integration. More recently, pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived donor populations and engineered constructs have expanded the therapeutic repertoire, enabling precise specification of interneuron subtypes, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes tailored to the injured spinal cord. Advances in genetic engineering, including CRISPR-based editing, trophic factor overexpression, and immune-evasive modifications, are giving rise to next-generation donor cells with enhanced survival and controllable integration. At the same time, biomaterials, pharmacological agents, activity-based therapies, and neuromodulation strategies are being combined with transplantation to overcome barriers and promote long-term recovery. In this review, we summarize progress in designing and engineering donor cells and tissues for SCI repair, highlight how combination strategies are reshaping the therapeutic landscape, and outline opportunities for next-generation approaches. Together, these advances point toward a future in which tailored, multimodal cell-based therapies achieve consistent and durable restoration of spinal cord function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Cord Injury)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7853 KB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of HAIC Combined with PD-(L)1 Inhibitors and Bevacizumab Versus HAIC with PD-(L)1 Inhibitors and TKIs in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Zizhuo Wang, Wei Xu, Songlin Song, Yanqiao Ren, Jiacheng Liu, Yiming Liu, Xuefeng Kan, Chuansheng Zheng and Bin Liang
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020314 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 123
Abstract
Background: The combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic agents represents a potential therapeutic strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of triple therapies combining HAIC with ICIs [...] Read more.
Background: The combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic agents represents a potential therapeutic strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of triple therapies combining HAIC with ICIs and either bevacizumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in these patients. Methods: This retrospective single-center study enrolled 65 consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received HAIC combined with ICIs plus either bevacizumab (bevacizumab group, n = 31) or TKIs (TKIs group, n = 34) between June 2021 and June 2023. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety profiles. Results: The bevacizumab group demonstrated significantly prolonged median PFS (10.9 vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.001) and higher ORR (83.9% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.047) compared with the TKIs group. DOR was longer in the bevacizumab group (7.9 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.008). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the bevacizumab group versus 22.6 months in the TKIs group. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 67.7% of the bevacizumab group and 73.5% of the TKIs group, with distinct toxicity profiles. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage (45.2%) and gastric ulcer (22.6%) predominated in the bevacizumab group, whereas the TKIs group exhibited more hepatic enzyme elevations (aspartate aminotransferase, 67.6%; alanine aminotransferase, 61.8%), proteinuria (29.4%), diarrhea (26.5%), hand-foot syndrome (20.6%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (11.8%). Conclusions: Bevacizumab-containing triplet therapy was associated with improved tumor control and delayed progression compared to TKIs-based regimens in advanced HCC. The higher bleeding risk in the bevacizumab group highlights the necessity of standardized baseline evaluation and adequate preventive measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

60 pages, 7234 KB  
Review
Cellular Allies Against Glioblastoma: Therapeutic Potential of Macrophages and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
by Bruno Agustín Cesca, Kali Pellicer San Martin and Luis Exequiel Ibarra
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010124 - 19 Jan 2026
Viewed by 233
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis despite maximal surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The complex and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity, and the presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis despite maximal surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The complex and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity, and the presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) severely restrict the efficacy of conventional and emerging therapies. In this context, cell-based strategies leveraging macrophages, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), and their derivatives have gained attention as “cellular allies” capable of modulating the GBM microenvironment and acting as targeted delivery platforms. Methods: This review systematically analyzes preclinical and early clinical literature on macrophage- and MSC-based therapeutic strategies in GBM, including engineered cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-coated nanoparticles, and hybrid biomimetic systems. Studies were selected based on relevance to GBM biology, delivery across or bypass of the BBB, microenvironmental modulation, and translational potential. Evidence from in vitro models, orthotopic and syngeneic in vivo models, and available clinical trials was critically evaluated, with emphasis on efficacy endpoints, biodistribution, safety, and manufacturing considerations. Results: The reviewed evidence demonstrates that macrophages and MSCs can function as active therapeutic agents or delivery vehicles, enabling localized oncolysis, immune reprogramming, stromal and vascular remodeling, and enhanced delivery of viral, genetic, and nanotherapeutic payloads. EVs and membrane-based biomimetic platforms further extend these capabilities while reducing cellular risks. However, therapeutic efficacy is highly context-dependent, influenced by tumor heterogeneity, BBB integrity, delivery route, and microenvironmental dynamics. Clinical translation remains limited, with most approaches at preclinical or early-phase clinical stages. Conclusions: Cell-based and cell-derived platforms represent a promising but still evolving therapeutic paradigm for GBM. Their successful translation will require rigorous biomarker-driven patient selection, improved models that capture invasive GBM biology, scalable GMP-compliant manufacturing, and rational combination strategies to overcome adaptive resistance mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Where Are We Now and Where Is Cell Therapy Headed? (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 30843 KB  
Article
Targeted Inhibition of Oncogenic microRNAs miR-21, miR-17, and miR-155 Suppresses Tumor Growth and Modulates Immune Response in Colorectal Cancer
by Olga Patutina, Aleksandra Sen’kova, Svetlana Miroshnichenko, Mona Awad, Oleg Markov, Daniil Gladkikh, Innokenty Savin, Ekaterina Seroklinova, Sergey Zhukov, Maxim Kupryushkin, Mikhail Maslov, Valentin Vlassov and Marina Zenkova
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(1), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010122 - 18 Jan 2026
Viewed by 268
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Aggressive cancer development is characterized by rapid tumor growth and progressive immune dysfunction. Tumor-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) emerge as master regulators of both malignant transformation and immune evasion, making them promising therapeutic targets. Using the highly aggressive CT-26 peritoneal adenomatosis model, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Aggressive cancer development is characterized by rapid tumor growth and progressive immune dysfunction. Tumor-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) emerge as master regulators of both malignant transformation and immune evasion, making them promising therapeutic targets. Using the highly aggressive CT-26 peritoneal adenomatosis model, this study explored the potential of selective miRNA inhibition to simultaneously suppress tumor growth and overcome immunosuppression. Methods and Results: Our results revealed that inhibition of miR-155, miR-21, and miR-17 by methylsulfonyl phosphoramidate (mesyl) oligonucleotides exhibited markedly different therapeutic profiles. miR-155 inhibition demonstrated minimal efficacy. miR-21 suppression provided early tumor regression and prevented cancer-associated thymic atrophy, translating into extended survival. miR-17 inhibition displayed delayed but superior tumor growth inhibition, significantly reducing pathologically elevated polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) populations, and nearly doubled animal lifespan. Combination therapy targeting all three miRNAs integrated these complementary mechanisms, maintaining consistent anti-tumor efficacy across early and late stages while providing thymic protection and MDSC reduction. Importantly, therapeutic responses in vivo substantially exceeded predictions based on in vitro tumor cell proliferation and motility measurements, revealing critical contributions of systemic immunomodulation. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that miRNA inhibition reshapes tumor–immune interactions, positioning anti-miRNA therapeutics as immunomodulatory agents for effective colorectal cancer treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 300 KB  
Review
Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: A Review for Its Use After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
by Ali Durdu, Ugur Hatipoglu, Hakan Eminoglu, Turgay Ulas, Mehmet Sinan Dal and Fevzi Altuntas
Biomolecules 2026, 16(1), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16010147 - 14 Jan 2026
Viewed by 231
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) exhibit broad differentiation capability and strong immunoregulatory potential mediated through intercellular communication and the release of diverse paracrine mediators. They represent a promising but still investigational therapeutic approach for managing complications associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). [...] Read more.
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) exhibit broad differentiation capability and strong immunoregulatory potential mediated through intercellular communication and the release of diverse paracrine mediators. They represent a promising but still investigational therapeutic approach for managing complications associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This review provides an updated synthesis of MSC biology, their bidirectional interaction with immune cells, and their functional contribution to the hematopoietic niche. It also evaluates current clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic roles of MSCs and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD/cGVHD), as well as in poor graft function. Mechanistic insights encompass macrophage polarization toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype, inhibition of dendritic cell maturation, enhancement of regulatory T-cell expansion, and modulation of cytokine signaling pathways. Within the bone marrow milieu, MSCs contribute to stromal restoration and angiogenic repair. Recent phase II/III trials in steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD have demonstrated overall response rates ranging from 48 to 71%. Efficacy appears particularly enhanced in pediatric patients and with early MSC administration. Across studies, MSC therapy shows a favorable safety profile; however, heterogeneity in response and inconsistent survival outcomes remain notable limitations. For poor graft function, limited prospective studies indicate hematopoietic recovery following third-party MSC infusions, and combination approaches such as co-administration with thrombopoietin receptor agonists are under investigation. MSC-derived EVs emulate many immunomodulatory effects of their parental cells with a potentially safer profile, though clinical validation remains in its infancy. MSC-oriented interventions hold substantial biological and therapeutic promise, offering a favorable safety margin; however, clinical translation is hindered by product variability, suboptimal engraftment and persistence, and inconsistent efficacy across studies. Future directions should emphasize standardized manufacturing and potency assays, biomarker-driven patient and timing selection, optimized conditioning and dosing strategies, and the systematic appraisal of EV-based or genetically modified MSC products through controlled trials. Full article
42 pages, 919 KB  
Review
Corneal Neovascularization: Pathogenesis, Current Insights and Future Strategies
by Evita Muller, Leo Feinberg, Małgorzata Woronkowicz and Harry W. Roberts
Biology 2026, 15(2), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15020136 - 13 Jan 2026
Viewed by 586
Abstract
The cornea is an avascular, immune-privileged tissue critical to maintaining transparency, optimal light refraction, and protection from microbial and immunogenic insults. Corneal neovascularization (CoNV) is a pathological sequela of multiple anterior segment diseases and presents a major cause for reduced visual acuity and [...] Read more.
The cornea is an avascular, immune-privileged tissue critical to maintaining transparency, optimal light refraction, and protection from microbial and immunogenic insults. Corneal neovascularization (CoNV) is a pathological sequela of multiple anterior segment diseases and presents a major cause for reduced visual acuity and overall quality of life. Various aetiologies, including infection (e.g., herpes simplex), inflammation (e.g., infective keratitis), hypoxia (e.g., contact lens overuse), degeneration (e.g., chemical burns), and trauma, disrupt the homeostatic avascular microenvironment, triggering an overactive compensatory response. This response is governed by a complex interplay of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. This review investigates the potential for these mediators to serve as therapeutic targets. Current therapeutic strategies for CoNV encompass topical corticosteroids, anti-VEGF injections, fine-needle diathermy, and laser modalities including argon, photodynamic therapy and Nd:YAG. Emerging therapies involve steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (including cyclosporine and rapamycin), anti-fibrotic agents and advanced drug delivery systems, including ocular nanosystems and viral vectors, to enhance drug bioavailability. Adjunctive therapy to attenuate the protective corneal epithelium prior to target neovascular plexi are further explored. Gene-based approaches, such as Aganirsen (antisense oligonucleotides) and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated VEGF-A editing, have shown promise in preclinical studies for CoNV regression and remission. Given the multifactorial pathophysiology of CoNV, combination therapies targeting multiple molecular pathways may offer improved visual outcomes. Case studies of CoNV highlight the need for multifaceted approaches tailored to patient demographics and underlying ocular diseases. Future research and clinical trials are essential to elucidate optimal therapeutic strategies and explore combination therapies to ensure better management, improved treatment outcomes, and long-term remission of this visually disabling condition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4485 KB  
Article
Identification of Immune&Driver Molecular Subtypes Optimizes Immunotherapy Strategies for Gastric Cancer
by Jing Gan, Bo Yang, Shuangshuang Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Manyi Xu, Yongle Xu, Xinrong Li, Wenbo Dong, Yusen Zhao, Mengmeng Liu, Wei Feng, Yujie Liu, Junjie Duan, Shangwei Ning and Hui Zhi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(2), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020696 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 286
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a promising treatment for gastric cancer. However, its effectiveness varies significantly across subtypes because of heterogeneous immune microenvironments and genomic alterations. Here, we established Immune&Driver molecular subtypes CS1 and CS2 by systematically integrating multi-omics data for immune-related and driver genes. [...] Read more.
Immunotherapy has become a promising treatment for gastric cancer. However, its effectiveness varies significantly across subtypes because of heterogeneous immune microenvironments and genomic alterations. Here, we established Immune&Driver molecular subtypes CS1 and CS2 by systematically integrating multi-omics data for immune-related and driver genes. CS1 was linked to a better prognosis, while CS2 represented a poorer prognostic phenotype. CS1 displayed enhanced genomic instability, marked by higher mutation frequency and chromosomal alterations. In contrast, CS2 exhibited higher immune activity, with a higher density of immune cell infiltration and increased expression of chemokines and immune checkpoint genes. Among FDA-approved anti-cancer agents included in a pan-cancer drug sensitivity prediction framework, CS1 was predicted to be more sensitive to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, whereas CS2 was predicted to be more responsive to immune-related agents. In melanoma datasets, a CS2-like transcriptomic pattern was associated with improved response to anti-PD-1 therapy, with the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 showing more favorable response patterns compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Additionally, we developed an immunotherapy response prediction model using PCA-based logistic regression according to the transcriptional expression of CS biomarkers. The model was trained in melanoma immunotherapy cohorts and validated across independent melanoma datasets, and it further achieved a higher AUC in an external gastric cancer cohort treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Collectively, this study highlights immune and genomic heterogeneity in gastric cancer and provides a hypothesis-generating framework for exploring immunotherapy response. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 796 KB  
Review
Targeting PRMT5 in Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma: Opportunities and Challenges
by Kyle Ernzen and Amanda R. Panfil
Viruses 2026, 18(1), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18010094 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 280
Abstract
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive T-cell malignancy caused by persistent infection with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). ATLL remains difficult to treat despite intensive chemotherapy, antiviral therapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The limited durability of current treatment strategies [...] Read more.
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive T-cell malignancy caused by persistent infection with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). ATLL remains difficult to treat despite intensive chemotherapy, antiviral therapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The limited durability of current treatment strategies highlights the need for mechanism-based therapeutic approaches. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is a type II arginine methyltransferase that regulates transcription, RNA splicing, DNA damage responses, and immune signaling through symmetric dimethylation of histone and non-histone substrates. PRMT5 is frequently overexpressed across hematologic and solid tumors. Preclinical studies indicate that PRMT5 expression is elevated during HTLV-1-mediated T-cell transformation and that pharmacologic inhibition of PRMT5 selectively impairs the survival and transformation of infected T cells in vitro and in vivo. In this review, we highlight the current understanding of PRMT5 biology in cancer, summarize preclinical studies supporting PRMT5 as a therapeutic target in ATLL, and discuss key challenges to future clinical translation. We also discuss emerging approaches such as rational combination therapies and tumor-selective PRMT5 inhibitors as potential paths toward treatment for ATLL. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 351 KB  
Review
Advances in mRNA-Based Melanoma Vaccines: A Narrative Review of Lipid Nanoparticle and Dendritic Cell Delivery Platforms
by Connor K. Sisk, Laci M. Turner, Shafkat Meraj and Nabiha Yusuf
Cells 2026, 15(2), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15020099 - 6 Jan 2026
Viewed by 619
Abstract
Melanoma remains one of the deadliest cutaneous malignancies worldwide, and despite advances in systemic therapy, recurrence and treatment resistance remain frequent challenges. Following the success of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, mRNA-based cancer vaccines targeting melanoma antigens have emerged as a promising therapeutic direction. This [...] Read more.
Melanoma remains one of the deadliest cutaneous malignancies worldwide, and despite advances in systemic therapy, recurrence and treatment resistance remain frequent challenges. Following the success of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, mRNA-based cancer vaccines targeting melanoma antigens have emerged as a promising therapeutic direction. This review summarizes current evidence on mRNA melanoma vaccines, focusing on two leading delivery platforms: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and dendritic cell (DC) vaccines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 2015 to 2025 identified clinical trials, preclinical studies, and review articles evaluating mRNA vaccine constructs and delivery strategies. Completed clinical studies demonstrate that personalized LNP-formulated mRNA vaccines can enhance neoantigen-specific T-cell responses and improve recurrence-free survival, particularly when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. DC-based mRNA vaccines also show potent immunogenicity, with stronger responses observed when DC maturation is optimized. Ongoing trials continue to investigate next-generation LNP formulations, DC priming strategies, and personalized neoantigen approaches. Overall, current evidence indicates that both LNP and DC platforms can augment antitumor immunity by broadening T-cell responses and enhancing checkpoint inhibition. Continued refinement of delivery vehicles, neoantigen selection, and scalable manufacturing processes will be essential to realizing the full clinical potential of mRNA vaccines in melanoma. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop