Search Results (73)

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is the most common hereditary colorectal adenomatous polyposis and cancer syndrome which has historically been associated with a near absolute risk of colorectal cancer. However, the morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer has been greatly diminished by pre-symptomatic genetic testing which identifies affected individuals and by appropriately timed, risk-reducing surgery of the colorectum. Following colorectal surgery, cancer risk beyond the retained rectum or ileal pouch includes other gastrointestinal organs, especially those of the upper gastrointestinal tract. While genotype–phenotype correlations exist for the severity of colonic polyposis, they have not been demonstrated for upper gastrointestinal tract manifestations. We reviewed the impact of ethnicity on the upper gastrointestinal manifestations of FAP by a comparison of published data in patients with FAP from Asian and Western countries. Our main findings demonstrate that following risk-reducing surgery to mitigate colorectal cancer risk, patients with FAP remain at increased risk for upper gastrointestinal polyposis and cancer. The duodenal and gastric phenotype differs between patients with FAP from the West and the East, and all should be followed in a multidisciplinary surveillance program. Following risk-reducing surgery to mitigate colorectal cancer risk, patients with familial adenomatous polyposis remain at increased risk for upper gastrointestinal polyposis and cancer. The duodenal and gastric phenotype differs between patients with FAP from the West and the East, and all should be followed in a multidisciplinary surveillance program. Full article

Background and Objectives: Lynch syndrome (LS), an autosomal dominant condition arising from germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, is a major cause of hereditary early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC). Although patients diagnosed before age 50 represent a critical subgroup where Lynch syndrome might be more prevalent, data on the precise frequency, clinical outcomes, and molecular correlates remain heterogeneous across studies. This systematic review was conducted to (1) estimate the prevalence of MMR deficiency (dMMR) and confirmed LS in patients diagnosed with CRC before the age of 50, and (2) examine immunohistochemistry (IHC) mismatch repair testing patterns and associated molecular findings (BRAF mutations, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, somatic MMR gene alterations). Methods: Following a predefined search strategy in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, five relevant studies were identified (n = 5). Each study comprised patients younger than 50 who underwent IHC-based tumor screening. Data extraction covered demographic details, number of patients tested, proportion with abnormal IHC, frequency of somatic or germline MMR gene mutations, and method of classification into sporadic dMMR vs. LS. Quality assessment was performed using recommended scales for observational studies. Results: Among 5 studies totaling 960 early-onset CRC patients, the frequency of dMMR CRC ranged from 8.4% to 19.1%. The confirmed prevalence of LS among all young-onset CRC was between 5.0% and 5.9% in three studies but reached 8.9% in another and 5.1% in yet another. Across all studies, the presence of right-sided tumors and histopathological features such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were more common in dMMR cancers. Incorporation of MLH1-promoter hypermethylation and/or BRAF V600E mutation testing aided discrimination of sporadic dMMR CRC from germline LS cases. Conclusions: The prevalence of LS in CRC patients younger than 50 is clinically significant, at approximately 5–9%. Routine IHC-based MMR screening is both feasible and effective for detecting LS in early-onset CRC. Further research is needed to standardize universal testing protocols, delineate the role of additional molecular assays, and ensure comprehensive genetic counseling for at-risk individuals. Full article

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the deadliest types of cancer globally. While early detection helps avert adverse outcomes, screening is only recommended for individuals at high risk, specifically those with familial and/or genetic predispositions. The objectives of this study are to systematically review primary studies on the cost-effectiveness of PC screening and to identify the critical factors that influence cost-effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Economic evaluation studies on PC screening were identified from searches on the SCOPUS and PubMed databases. The quality of reporting of the selected articles was assessed according to CHEERS 2022. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers conducted the title–abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction to select relevant articles. The authors’ consensus was used to settle disagreements. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, measured by cost per quality-adjusted life year and cost per life year saved. Results: Nine studies were selected for the final review. Most studies demonstrated that one-time screening for PC among high-risk individuals was cost-effective compared with no screening, while others found annual screening to also be cost-effective. High-risk was generally defined as having a >5% lifetime risk of PC and included individuals with either familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) or genetic susceptibility syndromes such as Peutz–Jeghers Syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, hereditary non-polypoid colorectal cancer syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and BRCA2 mutations. Individuals with new-onset diabetes (NOD) were also considered high-risk. Screening using mainly endoscopic ultrasound was cost-effective among FPC individuals and those with genetic syndromes. Risk-based screening was also cost-effective among patients with NOD. Conclusion: Screening for PC is cost-effective among selected high-risk individuals. However, cost-effectiveness depends on epidemiological factors, cost, the diagnostic performance of screening tools, and the overall design of studies. Full article

Lynch syndrome (LS)—also known as Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)—is caused by pathogenic germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Although it accounts for only 1–5% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs), LS presents with a particularly high lifetime cancer risk and often occurs at younger ages. Identifying LS in patients under 60 years old is crucial for targeted surveillance and early interventions. Variations in clinical presentation and prognosis may exist based on the specific gene mutated, yet these patterns are not fully elucidated. This review aims to synthesize data on clinical outcomes among LS patients under 60, with an emphasis on how different MMR gene mutation patterns might influence prognosis, survival, and treatment decisions. Five population-based studies examining CRC patients younger than 60 years were included according to predefined eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data focusing on MMR deficiency detection methods (microsatellite instability [MSI] and/or immunohistochemistry [IHC]), rates of confirmed germline mutations, frequency of BRAF testing, and clinical endpoints such as stage distribution, survival outcomes, and recurrence. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools appropriate to each study design. The synthesis focused on comparing outcomes among individuals with MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 mutations, as well as delineating the proportion of patients with sporadic MSI under 60 years of age. Across the five studies, MSI positivity in CRC patients under 60 years ranged from 7.5% to 13%. The frequency of confirmed germline MMR mutations varied between 0.8% and 5.2% in specific cohorts, aligning with LS prevalence estimates of 1–5%. Different mutation patterns correlated with some variation in clinical presentation. Cases with MSH2 and MLH1 mutations more frequently exhibited synchronous or metachronous tumors, while MSH6 and PMS2 mutations displayed more heterogeneous IHC patterns. Where survival data were provided, LS patients under 60 years had better overall survival compared to MMR-proficient individuals, though some studies also noted a potential lack of benefit from standard 5-fluorouracil adjuvant therapy in MMR-deficient tumors. Screening by MSI or by IHC—supplemented with BRAF mutation testing to exclude sporadic MSI—facilitates early detection of LS in CRC patients under 60 and highlights notable differences between mutation types. Although overall outcomes for LS patients can be favorable, especially for stage II disease, the precise impact of each specific mutated gene on clinical course remains heterogeneous. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to clarify optimal screening protocols and individualized treatment strategies for LS patients under 60. Full article

Background: Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Lynch syndrome (LS), and Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS), are associated with an increased risk of small bowel cancer (SBC). Due to the low incidence and non-specific presentation of SBC, effective surveillance strategies are essential for early detection and management. This review aims to evaluate and compare current endoscopic techniques for small bowel surveillance in these patients. Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies sourced from PubMed. Various endoscopic modalities, including capsule endoscopy (CE), device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), and intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE), were assessed for their diagnostic yield, safety, and clinical utility. Surveillance recommendations of the different syndromes were also examined. Results: CE offers high sensitivity but lacks histological sampling capability. DAE, including double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), enables direct visualization, biopsy, and therapeutic interventions, albeit with greater procedural complexity. In FAP, duodenal surveillance follows the Spigelman classification to stratify cancer risk, while jejunal and ileal polyps remain less studied. LS patients have an increased SBC risk, warranting tailored endoscopic approaches. In PJS, surveillance aims to mitigate intussusception risks and allow early malignancy detection. Conclusions: Optimized surveillance strategies in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes require a multimodal approach, integrating advanced endoscopic techniques with genetic risk stratification. Centralized care in tertiary centers improves outcomes by ensuring standardized surveillance protocols and enhancing early cancer detection. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to CE and DAE is shaping promising prospects for the future surveillance of small bowel polyps by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing the duration of the diagnostic process. Further research should investigate AI-assisted imaging and molecular biomarkers to optimize screening strategies. Full article

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common oncological diseases among men. Up to 20% of PC cases are associated with hereditary risks or syndromes. The impact of common variants, particularly EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048, on developing PC and other malignancies remains unclear. There are also no data on the frequency of this variant in the Kazakh population or its association with PC, nor its potential connection with other malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We utilized the TruSight Cancer Sequencing Panel to assess pathological genomic variants in 72 male patients with histologically verified aggressive PC and 119 patients of Kazakh nationality with histologically confirmed CRC compared to the control group. Results: A variant in the intron of the EHBP1 gene c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 was identified in 18 patients (25%) out of 72 with PC, while in the control group of 41 healthy males, the rs721048 variant was found in only 4 (9.8%) individuals. In the CRC group, rs721048 was detected in 17 cases (14.2%) and eight control individuals (10%). Conclusions: The frequency of the EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 variant in the PC group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in healthy males of Kazakh nationality. Identifying EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A among the male population of Kazakhstan will help form the high-risk groups for PC to prevent the development of malignant neoplasms. The presence of rs721048 was not significantly associated with the risk of developing CRC in our study. Full article

Of all new cases of colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for approximately 3%. This syndrome is the most common hereditary cancer syndrome and is caused by pathogenic variants in the genes responsible for DNA mismatch repair. Although the relationship between colorectal cancer risk and diet is well established, little is known regarding the influence of diet and nutritional characteristics on LS’s clinical evolution. There is some evidence suggesting that individuals living with LS should follow general guidelines for diet and alcohol restriction/moderation, so as to achieve and maintain a favorable weight status and overall health and quality of life. However, more research is needed, preferentially from clinical studies of a prospective nature with robust designs, to better inform diet and behavioral patterns targeting cancer prevention in LS. Full article

Background: Hereditary polyposis syndromes are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. They are classified based on polyp histology, inheritance mode, causal gene, and colonic and extracolonic manifestations. Their diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping and heterogeneous clinical presentations. Methods: A multigene next-generation sequencing panel was used to screen 75 index cases with colorectal polyps and a personal/family history of cancer for key hereditary polyposis-associated genes (APC, BMPR1A, MUTYH, PTEN, SMAD4, and STK11) in order to identify germline genetic variants. Results: In the screened index cases, we found 14 pathogenic variants involving APC, MUTYH, SMAD4, and STK11 and 6 variants of uncertain significance involving APC, BMPR1A, and SMAD4. In this cohort, four patients not fulfilling the recommended eligibility criteria of current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for genetic testing were molecularly diagnosed with a hereditary polyposis syndrome. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that stringent NCCN eligibility criteria for molecular screening may lead to missing some of the patients affected by hereditary polyposis syndromes. This highlights the need for a careful evaluation of patients’ clinical manifestations, polyp number, age of polyp onset, and family history to select appropriate candidates for molecular diagnosis of these conditions. Full article

Background and aims: Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes (HCCS), including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (LS), are the two most important high-risk conditions for colorectal cancer (CRC). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk by two to six times compared with that in the general population. The intersection of these two conditions has rarely been documented in literature. We aimed to summarize the prevalence, pathogenesis, and current evidence-based management of IBD and HCCS and the underlying molecular mechanisms of accelerated carcinogenesis due to combined inflammation and genetic predisposition. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched until June 2024 to identify relevant studies investigating the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of IBD and coexisting hereditary CRC syndromes. Results: Co-occurrence of IBD and hereditary CRC syndromes is exceptionally uncommon. Individuals with LS and IBD tend to develop CRC at a younger age than those without IBD, with patients with ulcerative colitis facing particularly elevated risks. The interaction between mismatch deficiency and chronic inflammation requires further investigation. Full article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in terms of cancer incidence worldwide and is responsible for 8% of all deaths globally. Approximately 10% of CRC cases are caused by inherited pathogenic mutations in driver genes involved in pathways that are crucial for CRC tumorigenesis and progression. These hereditary mutations significantly increase the risk of initial benign polyps or adenomas developing into cancer. In recent years, the rapid and accurate sequencing of CRC-specific multigene panels by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has enabled the identification of several recurrent pathogenic variants with established functional consequences. In parallel, rare genetic variants that are not characterized and are, therefore, called variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) have also been detected. The classification of VUSs is a challenging task because each amino acid has specific biochemical properties and uniquely contributes to the structural stability and functional activity of proteins. In this scenario, the ability to computationally predict the effect of a VUS is crucial. In particular, in silico prediction methods can provide useful insights to assess the potential impact of a VUS and support additional clinical evaluation. This approach can further benefit from recent advances in artificial intelligence-based technologies. In this review, we describe the main in silico prediction tools that can be used to evaluate the structural and functional impact of VUSs and provide examples of their application in the analysis of gene variants involved in hereditary CRC syndromes. Full article

Despite recent campaigns for screening and the latest advances in cancer therapy and molecular biology, gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms remain among the most frequent and lethal human tumors. Most GI neoplasms are sporadic, but there are some well-known familial syndromes associated with a significant risk of developing both benign and malignant GI tumors. Although some of these entities were described more than a century ago based on clinical grounds, the increasing molecular information obtained with high-throughput techniques has shed light on the pathogenesis of several of them. The vast amount of information gained from next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of some high-risk genetic variants, although others remain to be discovered. The opportunity for genetic assessment and counseling in these families has dramatically changed the management of these syndromes, though it has also resulted in significant psychological distress for the affected patients, especially those with indeterminate variants. Herein, we aim to summarize the most relevant hereditary cancer syndromes involving the stomach and colon, with an emphasis on new molecular findings, novel entities, and recent changes in the management of these patients. Full article

Hereditary cancer syndromes caused by germline mutations account for 5–10% of all cancers. The finding of a genetic mutation could have far-reaching consequences for pharmaceutical therapy, personalized prevention strategies, and cascade testing. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s (NCCN) and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines, unaffected family members should be tested only if the affected one is unavailable. This article explores whether germline genetic testing may be offered to high-risk families for hereditary cancer even if a living affected relative is missing. A retrospective study was carried out on 103 healthy subjects tested from 2017 to 2023. We enrolled all subjects with at least two first- or second-degree relatives affected by breast, ovarian, pancreatic, gastric, prostate, or colorectal cancer. All subjects were tested by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panel of 27 cancer-associated genes. In the study population, 5 (about 5%) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) were found, while 40 (42%) had a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). This study highlights the importance of genetic testing for individuals with a strong family history of hereditary malignancies. This approach would allow women who tested positive to receive tailored treatment and prevention strategies based on their personal mutation status. Full article

Cascade genetic testing and surveillance reduce morbidity and mortality in Lynch syndrome. However, barriers to conveying information about genetic disorders within families result in low uptake of genetic testing. Provider-mediated interventions may increase uptake but raise legal and ethical concerns. We describe 30 years of national experience with cascade genetic testing combining family- and provider-mediated contact in Lynch syndrome families in the Danish Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) Register. We aimed to estimate the added value of information letters to family members in Lynch syndrome families (provider-mediated contact) compared to family members not receiving such letters and thus relying on family-mediated contact. National clinical practice for cascade genetic testing, encompassing infrastructure, legislation, acceptance, and management of the information letters, is also discussed. Cascade genetic testing resulted in 7.3 additional tests per family. Uptake of genetic testing was 54.4% after family-mediated and 64.9% after provider-mediated contact, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.8 (p < 0.001). The uptake of genetic testing was highest in the first year after diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in the family, with 72.5% tested after provider-mediated contact. In conclusion, the Danish model combining family- and provider-mediated contact can increase the effect of cascade genetic testing. Full article

Background and Aims: Lynch syndrome (LS) is currently one of the most prevalent hereditary cancer conditions, accounting for 3% of all colorectal cancers and for up to 15% of those with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and it was one of the first historically identified. The understanding of the molecular carcinogenesis of LS tumors has progressed significantly in recent years. We aim to review the most recent advances in LS research and explore genotype-based approaches in surveillance, personalized cancer prevention, and treatment strategies. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify relevant studies, conducted up to December 2023, investigating molecular carcinogenesis in LS, surveillance strategies, cancer prevention, and treatment in LS tumors. Results: Multigene panel sequencing is becoming the benchmark in the diagnosis of LS, allowing for the detection of a pathogenic constitutional variant in one of the MMR genes. Emerging data from randomized controlled trials suggest possible preventive roles of resistant starch and/or aspirin in LS. Vaccination with immunogenic frameshift peptides appears to be a promising approach for both the treatment and prevention of LS-associated cancers, as evidenced by pre-clinical and preliminary phase 1/2a studies. Conclusions: Although robust diagnostic algorithms, including prompt testing of tumor tissue for MMR defects and referral for genetic counselling, currently exist for suspected LS in CRC patients, the indications for LS screening in cancer-free individuals still need to be refined and standardized. Investigation into additional genetic and non-genetic factors that may explain residual rates of interval cancers, even in properly screened populations, would allow for more tailored preventive strategies. Full article

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome caused by germline mutations in a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene or in the EPCAM gene. LS is associated with an increased lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other malignancies. The screening algorithm for LS patient selection is based on the identification of CRC specimens that have MMR loss/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and are wild-type for BRAF^V600. Here, we sought to clinically and molecularly characterize patients with these features. From 2017 to 2023, 841 CRC patients were evaluated for MSI and BRAF^V600E mutation status, 100 of which showed MSI-H. Of these, 70 were wild-type for BRAF^V600. Among these 70 patients, 30 were genetically tested for germline variants in hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome genes. This analysis showed that 19 of these 30 patients (63.3%) harbored a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in MMR genes, 2 (6.7%) harbored a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in MMR genes, 3 (10%) harbored a VUS in other cancer-related genes, and 6 (20%) were negative to genetic testing. These findings highlight the importance of personalized medicine for tailored genetic counseling, management, and surveillance of families with LS and other hereditary cancer syndromes. Full article