Search Results (8)

Background: Intradialytic hypotension is a common complication in haemodialysis, affecting up to 30% of sessions. It results from an imbalance between ultrafiltration and compensatory mechanisms, such as vascular tone and plasma refilling. Volume-controlled biosensors allow for the continuous monitoring of the haemoconcentration, enabling early detection and prevention of hypotension. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of biosensors in reducing hypotensive episodes. Two biosensors were compared: the Blood Volume Monitor and the Haemomaster system. Data were collected over two four-month periods: before and after biosensor implementation. Nursing staff received specific training, and a protocol for consistent data collection was established. Informed consent was obtained from all eligible participants. The incidence of intradialytic hypotension was compared between sessions with and without biosensor use. Additionally, outcomes were analysed according to biosensor type. Results: A total of 2262 dialysis sessions from 22 patients were analysed. The cohort was 54.5% male, with a mean age of 60 years (SE = 21); 27.3% had diabetes and 81.8% had hypertension. Post-dilution haemodiafiltration was performed in 62.8% of sessions. Intradialysis hypotension occurred in 11.2% of sessions using biosensors compared to 14.0% without (p = 0.021). No significant difference was found between biosensor types (10.8% vs. 11.8%; p = 0.531), although device 1 reached a significantly lower critical blood volume (mean: 10 L; SE = 4 vs. 16 L; SE = 5; p = 0.000). Conclusions: Biosensor use was associated with fewer hypotensive episodes and greater haemodynamic stability. These findings support their integration into routine dialysis practice to improve treatment, safety, and individualised care. Full article

Protein-bound uraemic toxins (PBUTs), such as indoxyl sulphate (IS) and p-cresyl sulphate (PCS), are poorly cleared by conventional haemodialysis (HD) or haemodiafiltration (HDF). Haemoadsorption combined with HD (HAHD) using the novel pHA130 cartridge may increase PBUT removal, and this trial aimed to compare its efficacy and safety with HDF in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In this single-centre, open-label trial, 30 maintenance HD patients were randomized (1:1:1) to HDF once every two weeks (HDF-q2w), HAHD once every two weeks (HAHD-q2w), or HAHD once weekly (HAHD-q1w) for 8 weeks, with the primary endpoint being the single-session reduction ratio (RR) of IS. The combined HAHD group (n = 20) demonstrated a significantly greater IS reduction than the HDF-q2w group (n = 10) (46.9% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.044) and superior PCS clearance (44.6% vs. 31.4%; p = 0.003). Both HAHD regimens significantly reduced predialysis IS levels at Week 8. Compared with HDF, weekly HAHD provided greater relief from pruritus and improved sleep quality, with comparable adverse events among groups. In conclusion, HAHD with the pHA130 cartridge is more effective than HDF for enhancing single-session PBUT removal and alleviating uraemic symptoms in patients with ESRD, with weekly application showing optimal symptomatic benefits. Full article

Background: Removal of large uraemic toxins is still a challenge. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) has produced some results, although large convective volume, optimal vascular access to increase the blood flow rate and strict water quality management are required. Medium cut-off, high-retention-onset membranes have been recently developed, introducing the concept therapy called expanded haemodialysis (HDx). Furthermore, vitamin E-coated membrane has potential beneficial effects on inflammation and oxidative stress. Methods: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted for 3 months among 24 chronic haemodialysis patients. Patients were randomly assigned into either HDF with high-flux membrane or HDx with Theranova or ViE-X membrane. The primary goal was to assess albumin loss among the three types of dialyzers. Secondary goals included assessment of depurative efficacy for uraemic toxins and clinical outcomes. Results: Mean albumin loss was significantly higher in patients undergoing HDx with Theranova membrane, without any difference in serum albumin concentration among the three groups. Instantaneous clearance of small and middle molecules was significantly higher in patients undergoing HDF, but we did not find differences in removal ratio and Kt/V. Reduction in the erythropoietin resistance index was observed in patients treated with ViE-X membrane due to their lower dialysis vintage. Conclusions: The higher albumin loss during HDx has no effects on pre-dialysis serum albumin. HDx with Theranova in the presence of lower session length, lower Qb, lower convective dose, and lower instantaneous clearance reached the same dialysis efficacy compared to HDF. Full article

Optical online methods are used to monitor the haemodialysis treatment efficiency of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the administration of UV-absorbing drugs, such as paracetamol (Par), on the accuracy of optical monitoring the removal of uremic toxins uric acid (UA) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) during standard haemodialysis (HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. Nine patients received Par in daily dosages 1–4 g for 30 sessions. For 137 sessions, in 36 patients the total daily dosage of UV-absorbing drugs was less than 500 mg, and for 6 sessions 3 patients received additional UV-absorbing drugs. Par administration slightly affected the accuracy of optically assessed removal of UA expressed as bias between optically and laboratory-assessed reduction ratios (RR) during HD but not HDF employing UV absorbance of spent dialysate (p < 0.05) at 295 nm wavelength with the strongest correlation between the concentration of UA and absorbance. Corresponding removal of IS based on fluorescence at Ex280/Em400 nm during HD and HDF was not affected. Administration of UV-absorbing drugs may in some settings influence the accuracy of optical assessments in spent dialysate of the removal of uremic solutes during haemodialysis treatment of ESKD patients. Full article

Mortality and morbidity rates among critically ill septic patients having acute kidney injury (AKI) are very high, considering the total number of deaths after their admission. Inappropriate selection of the type of continuous renal replacement therapy and inadequate therapy become the immediate causes of these issues. Dialysis is a commonly used treatment intended to prolong the life of AKI patients. Dialysis membranes, which are the core of dialysis treatment, must be properly selected to ensure fair treatment to the patients. The accumulation of certain types of molecules must be dealt with using the right membrane. Whether it is low-flux, high-flux, or adsorptive type, the dialysis membrane should be chosen depending on the condition of the patients. The selection of dialysis membranes should also be based on their effect on the treatment outcomes and well-being. All these options are needed to serve the patients of different clinical settings. The use of dialysis membranes is not restricted to conventional haemodialysis, but rather they can be employed in haemoperfusion, haemofiltration, haemodiafiltration, or a combination of any two of them. This review focuses in-depth on different types of dialysis membranes, their characteristics, and approaches in addressing the issues encountered in patients having AKI with sepsis and/or multiorgan failure in intensive care units. Full article

Tryptophan is an essential dietary amino acid that originates uremic toxins that contribute to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient outcomes. We evaluated serum levels and removal during haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration of tryptophan and tryptophan-derived uremic toxins, indoxyl sulfate (IS) and indole acetic acid (IAA), in ESKD patients in different dialysis treatment settings. This prospective multicentre study in four European dialysis centres enrolled 78 patients with ESKD. Blood and spent dialysate samples obtained during dialysis were analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography to assess uremic solutes, their reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS). Mean free serum tryptophan and IS concentrations increased, and concentration of IAA decreased over pre-dialysis levels (67%, 49%, −0.8%, respectively) during the first hour of dialysis. While mean serum total urea, IS and IAA concentrations decreased during dialysis (−72%, −39%, −43%, respectively), serum tryptophan levels increased, resulting in negative RR (−8%) towards the end of the dialysis session (p < 0.001), despite remarkable Trp losses in dialysate. RR and TRS values based on serum (total, free) and dialysate solute concentrations were lower for conventional low-flux dialysis (p < 0.001). High-efficiency haemodiafiltration resulted in 80% higher Trp losses than conventional low-flux dialysis, despite similar neutral Trp RR values. In conclusion, serum Trp concentrations and RR behave differently from uremic solutes IS, IAA and urea and Trp RR did not reflect dialysis Trp losses. Conventional low-flux dialysis may not adequately clear Trp-related uremic toxins while high efficiency haemodiafiltration increased Trp losses. Full article

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of tissue fibrosis. The aminoterminal fragment of CTGF is a middle molecule that accumulates in chronic kidney disease. The aims of this study are to explore determinants of plasma CTGF in hemodialysis (HD) patients, investigate whether CTGF relates to all-cause mortality in HD patients, and investigate whether online-hemodiafiltration (HDF) lowers CTGF. Data from 404 patients participating in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST) were analyzed. Patients were randomized to low-flux HD or HDF. Pre-dialysis CTGF was measured by sandwich ELISA at baseline, after six and 12 months. CTGF was inversely related in multivariable analysis to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p < 0.001) and positively to cardiovascular disease (CVD) (p = 0.006), dialysis vintage (p < 0.001), interleukin-6 (p < 0.001), beta-2-microglobulin (p = 0.045), polycystic kidney disease (p < 0.001), tubulointerstitial nephritis (p = 0.002), and renal vascular disease (p = 0.041). Patients in the highest quartile had a higher mortality risk compared to those in the lowest quartile (HR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.02–2.88, p = 0.043). HDF lowered CTGF with 4.8% between baseline and six months, whereas during HD, CTGF increased with 4.9% (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in HD patients, CTGF is related to GFR, CVD and underlying renal disease and increased the risk of all-cause mortality. HDF reduces CTGF. Full article

The history of dialysis and diet can be viewed as a series of battles waged against potential threats to patients’ lives. In the early years of dialysis, potassium was identified as “the killer”, and the lists patients were given of forbidden foods included most plant-derived nourishment. As soon as dialysis became more efficient and survival increased, hyperphosphatemia, was identified as the enemy, generating an even longer list of banned aliments. Conversely, the “third era” finds us combating protein-energy wasting. This review discusses four questions and four paradoxes, regarding the diet-dialysis dyad: are the “magic numbers” of nutritional requirements (calories: 30–35 kcal/kg; proteins > 1.2 g/kg) still valid? Are the guidelines based on the metabolic needs of patients on “conventional” thrice-weekly bicarbonate dialysis applicable to different dialysis schedules, including daily dialysis or haemodiafiltration? The quantity of phosphate and potassium contained in processed and preserved foods may be significantly different from those in untreated foods: what are we eating? Is malnutrition one condition or a combination of conditions? The paradoxes: obesity is associated with higher survival in dialysis, losing weight is associated with mortality, but high BMI is a contraindication for kidney transplantation; it is difficult to limit phosphate intake when a patient is on a high-protein diet, such as the ones usually prescribed on dialysis; low serum albumin is associated with low dialysis efficiency and reduced survival, but on haemodiafiltration, high efficiency is coupled with albumin losses; banning plant derived food may limit consumption of “vascular healthy” food in a vulnerable population. Tailored approaches and agreed practices are needed so that we can identify attainable goals and pursue them in our fragile haemodialysis populations. Full article