Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (51)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = green agricultural subsidy policy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 3470 KiB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission Efficiency of Apple Production in China from 2003 to 2022
by Dejun Tan, Juanjuan Cheng, Jin Yu, Qian Wang and Xiaonan Chen
Agriculture 2025, 15(15), 1680; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151680 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 293
Abstract
Understanding the carbon emission efficiency of apple production (APCEE) is critical for promoting green and low-carbon agricultural development. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving factors of APCEE in China remain inadequately explored. This study employs life cycle assessment, super-efficiency slacks-based measures, [...] Read more.
Understanding the carbon emission efficiency of apple production (APCEE) is critical for promoting green and low-carbon agricultural development. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving factors of APCEE in China remain inadequately explored. This study employs life cycle assessment, super-efficiency slacks-based measures, and a panel Tobit model to evaluate the carbon footprint, APCEE, and its determinants in China’s two major production regions from 2003 to 2022. The results reveal that: (1) Producing one ton of apples in China results in 0.842 t CO2e emissions. Land carbon intensity and total carbon emissions peaked in 2010 (28.69 t CO2e/ha) and 2014 (6.52 × 107 t CO2e), respectively, exhibiting inverted U-shaped trends. Carbon emissions from various production areas show significant differences, with higher pressure on carbon emission reduction in the Loess Plateau region, especially in Gansu Province. (2) The APCEE in China exhibits a W-shaped trend (mean: 0.645), with overall low efficiency loss. The Bohai Bay region outperforms the Loess Plateau and national averages. (3) The structure of the apple industry, degree of agricultural mechanization, and green innovation positively influence APCEE, while the structure of apple cultivation, education level, and agricultural subsidies negatively impact it. Notably, green innovation and agricultural subsidies display lagged effects. Moreover, the drivers of APCEE differ significantly between the two major production regions. These findings provide actionable pathways for the green and low-carbon transformation of China’s apple industry, emphasizing the importance of spatially tailored green policies and technology-driven decarbonization strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 379 KiB  
Article
Agricultural Value Added, Renewable Energy, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey
by Neslihan Koç, Özgür Emre Koç, Florina Oana Virlanuta, Orhan Orçun Bıtrak, Uğur Çiçek, Radu Octavian Kovacs, Valentina-Alina Vasile (Dobrea) and Tincuta Vrabie
Energies 2025, 18(13), 3291; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18133291 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 621
Abstract
In this study, the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions for the period 1968–2022 in Turkey was evaluated within the framework of the EKC (Environmental Kuznets Curve) hypothesis. In addition, the impacts of renewable energy consumption and agricultural value added on carbon [...] Read more.
In this study, the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions for the period 1968–2022 in Turkey was evaluated within the framework of the EKC (Environmental Kuznets Curve) hypothesis. In addition, the impacts of renewable energy consumption and agricultural value added on carbon emissions were analyzed using the ARDL bounds testing approach. The validity of the results was also tested using the FMOLS and DOLS methods. The findings confirmed the existence of a cointegration relationship between carbon emissions and per capita income, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural value added. Long-term analyses indicate that renewable energy consumption reduces carbon emissions, whereas growth in agricultural value added leads to an increase in emissions. In addition, it has been determined that the EKC hypothesis is valid in both the long and short terms and that increases in per capita income raise emissions up to a certain threshold and have a mitigating effect when this threshold is exceeded. The results of the short-term analysis showed that the effects of renewable energy consumption vary across periods, and that agricultural value added increases emissions in the short term. This study provides empirical evidence for Turkey by incorporating sectoral variables within the EKC framework and offers meaningful insights for policymakers regarding the environmental impacts of agricultural value added and renewable energy use in the context of a developing country. Accordingly, fiscal policy instruments such as green taxation, carbon credit trading mechanisms, and financial and agricultural subsidies should be more effectively utilized in Turkey to support structural transformation in agriculture and promote the use of clean energy, in line with the findings that suggest the need for targeted agricultural and energy policies aligned with Turkey’s SDG commitments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sustainability and Energy Economy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 389 KiB  
Article
From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance
by Zhongping Wang and Xiaoying Tian
Agriculture 2025, 15(12), 1316; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121316 - 19 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 536
Abstract
This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) [...] Read more.
This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) has a significant negative impact on ROA, particularly in non-state firms; (2) green innovation (patents, GI) partially mediates this relationship, with a percentage of 9.09%, as GW diverts research and development resources toward image management. Robustness checks are employed to confirm the results obtained using ROE and lagged models. Property rights moderate the effects: non-state firms are more adversely affected by innovation dependency, while state firms are protected by policies. The “double-edged” mechanism elucidates GW’s short-term legitimacy gains in contrast to long-term innovation suppression and financial decline. The report calls for the establishment of standardised ESG metrics (for example, the disclosure of pesticide residue) and targeted green incentives (for example, SME R&D subsidies) to be aligned with UN SDGs 9.4 (green tech) and 12.6 (responsible production). The present study offers insights into the governance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters within the context of agriculture in China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 645 KiB  
Article
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Organic Farming in Lithuania and Poland
by Wirginia Rozumowska, Michał Soliwoda, Jacek Kulawik, Aistė Galnaitytė and Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5623; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125623 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 439
Abstract
The European Green Deal, including the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies, assumes an increase in the area under organic farming to 25% by 2030. In order to achieve this goal, it is important to understand the factors that lead to the development [...] Read more.
The European Green Deal, including the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies, assumes an increase in the area under organic farming to 25% by 2030. In order to achieve this goal, it is important to understand the factors that lead to the development of organic farming. Data from Lithuanian and Polish Farm Accountancy Data Network datasets and logistic regression was used to evaluate factors influencing the adoption of organic farming in two neighboring countries—Lithuania and Poland—that have quite different agricultural sectors. The study period was 2009–2019. The results indicated that multiple factors affected the probability of adopting organic farming in both Lithuania and Poland. However, the results were somewhat different at the beginning and at the end of the research period. The findings also demonstrated an important role of subsidies in the adoption of organic farming. These findings are particularly important for policy makers to design effective policies and programs aimed at supporting the development of organic farming in both Lithuania and Poland. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 4028 KiB  
Review
Integrating Green Infrastructure into Sustainable Agriculture to Enhance Soil Health, Biodiversity, and Microclimate Resilience
by Matthew Chidozie Ogwu and Enoch Akwasi Kosoe
Sustainability 2025, 17(9), 3838; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093838 - 24 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1723
Abstract
While green infrastructure (GI) offers numerous benefits, its implementation in low-resource settings remains constrained by limited policy support and upfront costs, highlighting the need for context-sensitive strategies. This paper highlights the value of integrating GI within sustainable agricultural systems and the effectiveness of [...] Read more.
While green infrastructure (GI) offers numerous benefits, its implementation in low-resource settings remains constrained by limited policy support and upfront costs, highlighting the need for context-sensitive strategies. This paper highlights the value of integrating GI within sustainable agricultural systems and the effectiveness of various GI techniques in improving soil microbial communities and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The transition to sustainable agricultural systems requires innovative strategies that balance productivity, environmental conservation, and resilience to climate change. Sustainable agriculture increasingly leverages technological innovations in GI to enhance productivity, biodiversity, and microclimate resilience. Green infrastructure has found direct application in agroforestry, conservation buffers, precision agriculture, soil health monitoring systems, and nature-based solutions such as regenerative soil management. These applications are crucial in enhancing soil health, water retention, and biodiversity, while mitigating microclimatic impacts. Precision agriculture tools, like IoT sensors, drones, and AI-driven analytics, allow farmers to optimize water, nutrient, and pesticide use, boosting yields and efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. Simultaneously, advanced soil health monitoring technologies track soil moisture, nutrients, and biological activity in real time, informing practices that maintain long-term soil fertility and carbon sequestration. This integrated approach yields practical on-farm benefits, such as higher crop stability during droughts and enhanced habitats for beneficial species. In conclusion, there is a need for supportive frameworks, like subsidies for GI adoption, application of precision tools, incentives for improving soil microclimate, development of innovative GI programs, and knowledge-sharing initiatives, to encourage farmer adoption. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development of Agricultural Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2472 KiB  
Article
Research on the Reverse-Supply-Chain Optimization of Agricultural Waste Based on an Evolutionary Game
by Wei Shi, Sanger Ni and Kejun Lin
Sustainability 2025, 17(7), 3059; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073059 - 30 Mar 2025
Viewed by 649
Abstract
The irrational disposal of agricultural waste harms the interests of the main bodies of the related supply chain while seriously jeopardizing the environment. To a certain extent, the reverse supply chain (RSC) of agricultural waste can provide more high-quality resources for agricultural production [...] Read more.
The irrational disposal of agricultural waste harms the interests of the main bodies of the related supply chain while seriously jeopardizing the environment. To a certain extent, the reverse supply chain (RSC) of agricultural waste can provide more high-quality resources for agricultural production and promote the green development of agricultural production. Therefore, RSC optimization is of great significance to the sustainable development of agriculture. We constructed an evolutionary game model of agricultural waste recyclers and reprocessing enterprises for agricultural waste. The stability of mixed strategies was analyzed using a Jacobi matrix, and evolutionary paths under varying parameter ranges were simulated using MATLAB. The simulation results show that in the early stage of RSC optimization, government subsidies to reprocessing enterprises and increased subsidies for agricultural waste recyclers are conducive to a more stable agricultural waste reverse-recycling market. When the agricultural waste reverse-recycling market reaches a certain scale, the government should gradually reduce subsidies, effectively preventing enterprises from being overly reliant on them. This study not only offers a decision-making foundation for agricultural waste recyclers and agricultural waste reprocessing enterprises to make optimal strategic choices but also serves as a reference for the government in formulating appropriate policies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 786 KiB  
Article
The Role of Green Patents in Innovation: An fsQCA Study of Chinese Listed Agricultural Enterprises
by Yangyang Zhao, Bojun Gu, Xin Xu and Dingding Yang
Sustainability 2025, 17(5), 2317; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052317 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1031
Abstract
This study employs a comparative fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the combined effects of traditional factors and green patents on innovation performance in Chinese listed agricultural enterprises, offering insights into sustainability in agriculture through innovation. By analyzing 84 valid cases from [...] Read more.
This study employs a comparative fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the combined effects of traditional factors and green patents on innovation performance in Chinese listed agricultural enterprises, offering insights into sustainability in agriculture through innovation. By analyzing 84 valid cases from 107 agricultural companies, we conduct two fsQCA analyses to compare innovation pathways with and without green patents as a conditional factor. The first analysis investigates the impacts of five factors—firm size, executives’ educational background, return on net assets, ownership concentration, and government subsidies—on non-green innovation performance, identifying four distinct pathways: executive-dispersed, employee-financed, executive-centralized, and executive-profitable. In the second analysis, green patents are introduced as an independent variable. The overall solution coverage remains stable, but the configurational landscape shifts, with two original pathways persisting and two new pathways emerging—both involving green patents. The findings suggest that the impact of green patents on innovation is condition-dependent rather than universally beneficial. Green patents amplify innovation performance only when supported by strong managerial education, financial stability, and policy incentives, particularly in the executive green synergy pathway, where raw coverage reaches 0.41, underscoring their role as a conditional multiplier in sustainable innovation. These results provide theoretical and empirical evidence for balancing economic benefits with environmental responsibility in agricultural enterprises and emphasize the need for targeted policy subsidies, enhanced managerial education, and optimized shareholder structures to drive sustainable innovation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1290 KiB  
Article
How Livelihood Capital Affects Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Farmers’ Cognition
by Jieyu Yang and Xiujuan Cui
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020763 - 19 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1078
Abstract
In light of global climate change and sustainable agricultural growth, it is critical to look at producers’ green production methods. Enhancing the quality of agricultural goods and reducing agricultural pollution are the main goals of future agricultural growth, and this is accomplished by [...] Read more.
In light of global climate change and sustainable agricultural growth, it is critical to look at producers’ green production methods. Enhancing the quality of agricultural goods and reducing agricultural pollution are the main goals of future agricultural growth, and this is accomplished by farmers using green production methods. Regarding the research data of 364 vegetable farmers, this study uses structural equation modeling and a mediation effect model to empirically assess the effect of livelihood capital and farmers’ cognition on their green behavior. The results show that (1) natural capital, human capital, financial capital, and social capital in the livelihood capital of vegetable growers may significantly impact producers’ green production behavior. It is not immediately clear how physical capital affects the way green manufacturing practices work. (2) Natural capital and green production behavior are completely mediated by environmental and policy cognition, while human capital and green production behavior are partly mediated by environmental and policy cognition. Human and natural capital indirectly influence farmers’ sustainable production techniques via these activities. Financial and social capital directly influence farmers’ sustainable production methods, with no mediation effect seen. (3) Farmers’ green production behavior is more significantly influenced by their cognitive behavior than by their livelihood capital. Accordingly, it is recommended that environmental education and policy promotion be strengthened, that farmers’ livelihood capital be accumulated via a variety of channels, that farmers’ subsidies for green production be increased, and that farmers’ knowledge of green production be improved. The cognitive level of farmers should also be raised. In addition to providing theoretical justification for analyzing farmers’ green production practices within the framework of sustainable agricultural development, this study also acts as a guide for pertinent government agencies to help farmers choose more ecologically friendly farming methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 3336 KiB  
Article
‘They Only Get the Feed That Grows on Our Farm’: A Survey Experiment on Government-Subsidized Greenwashing of Swiss Meat and Agricultural Policy
by Felix Schläpfer, Adriana Garibay and Stefan Ryf
Sustainability 2025, 17(2), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020682 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1374
Abstract
Increased consumer concern about environmental issues has led to a surge in green advertising, including misleading forms known as greenwashing. Definitions of greenwashing have mostly focused on companies misleading consumers about products, and existing empirical analyses of greenwashing effects have mostly used fabricated [...] Read more.
Increased consumer concern about environmental issues has led to a surge in green advertising, including misleading forms known as greenwashing. Definitions of greenwashing have mostly focused on companies misleading consumers about products, and existing empirical analyses of greenwashing effects have mostly used fabricated ad materials referring to fictitious products. The objective of the present paper is to use ad material from an actual ad campaign to examine joint greenwashing, by an industry organization and a national government, of consumer products and public policies. Using an actual government-subsidized video commercial for ‘Swiss meat’ as an example, the present paper examines greenwashing targeting both consumers and citizens to influence their product choices and policy opinions. Based on an online survey of an age- and gender-representative sample (n = 637), we measured aspects of consumer knowledge that would enable the consumers to put the ad’s message in perspective, perceptions of the ad, and beliefs about Swiss meat production. Furthermore, we used a two-factorial experimental design to examine how the video commercial and objective product information affected policy opinions relative to control treatments. We find that the consumers strongly overestimated the true percentage of Swiss farms that used the environmentally friendly feeding system featured in the ad. Regarding perceptions, 52% of the respondents ‘rather’ or ‘fully’ agreed with the statement ‘the ad conveys a realistic image of Swiss meat production’, and 41% ‘rather’ or ‘fully’ agreed with the statement ‘the ad shows the production of Swiss beef as it is’. Regarding beliefs, 51% of the respondents ‘partly’, ‘rather’, or ‘fully’ agreed that ‘more meat production in Switzerland is good for the environment’. The video commercial did not influence beliefs about Swiss meat but changed policy opinions in the favor of government subsidies for the advertisement of Swiss meat. The information treatment influenced policy opinions in the opposite direction but did not decrease the effect of the misleading ad. Other significant predictors of support for increased meat subsidies included frequent meat consumption, low factual knowledge, and positive product beliefs. The results of the survey indicate that the ad campaign may have unduly influenced perceptions of Swiss meat production and public opinion about agricultural policy. The findings raise concerns about the current self-regulation of the communication industry and joint private and public advertising of Swiss agricultural products and policies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Products and Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1217 KiB  
Article
Study on the Influencing Factors of Green Agricultural Subsidies on Straw Resource Utilization Technology Adopted by Farmers in Heilongjiang Province, China
by Cheng Guo, Meng Li and Hong Chen
Agriculture 2025, 15(1), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010093 - 3 Jan 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1086
Abstract
Due to climate, resource endowment, planting habits, policy publicity, subsidies, and constraints, there have been many problems in the utilization of straw resources in the cold, main grain-producing areas in northern China. Based on the theory of value perception, an analytical framework was [...] Read more.
Due to climate, resource endowment, planting habits, policy publicity, subsidies, and constraints, there have been many problems in the utilization of straw resources in the cold, main grain-producing areas in northern China. Based on the theory of value perception, an analytical framework was constructed, and the ordered logistic model was used to form an empirical analysis of the questionnaire data of more than 60 townships in 7 cities of Heilongjiang Province, trying to analyze the problems existing in the utilization of straw resources. The results show that the external factors include policy subsidy, policy punishment, and transportation convenience. Among the internal reasons, farmers’ personal characteristics, production habits, and perception of technical effectiveness and convenience have a significant impact on the application of straw resource utilization technology. Therefore, improving the intensity and precision of subsidies, strengthening the intensity of punishment, improving the popularization of technology, strengthening the ideological education of farmers to clarify the ecological value of straw resource utilization, and strengthening the construction of infrastructure to improve the convenience of transportation are effective means to promote straw resource utilization technology and promote the green transformation of agriculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 4764 KiB  
Article
Multi-Party Collaboration in Agricultural Green Technology Innovation and Adoption: An Evolutionary Game Approach
by Xueli Ma, Tianyuan Ren and Sardar M. N. Islam
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10236; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310236 - 22 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1498
Abstract
The collaborative promotion of agricultural green technology innovation and adoption (AGTIA) is essential for achieving green agriculture. However, there remains a need to raise both innovation and adoption levels, necessitating explorations of the effects of government subsidies and collaborative mechanisms. To this end, [...] Read more.
The collaborative promotion of agricultural green technology innovation and adoption (AGTIA) is essential for achieving green agriculture. However, there remains a need to raise both innovation and adoption levels, necessitating explorations of the effects of government subsidies and collaborative mechanisms. To this end, this paper builds an evolutionary game model to analyze the collaborative promotion of AGTIA. By introducing relevant parameters, such as government subsidies for AGTIA, dividends and liquidated damages within industrial technology innovation alliances (ITISAs), and cost reduction coefficients, this paper explores the impacts of the technology spillover effect, price premium of green agricultural products, and government subsidies on the strategic choices of related participants. The main findings are as follows: (1) The key factors influencing AGTIA are different and the government can implement different combinations of dynamic and static subsidy mechanisms at distinct stages of agricultural green development. Government subsidies play a major role at the initial stage, while ITISAs should take fuller advantage of AGTIA as green agriculture matures. (2) Increasing subsidies can promote AGTIA at the initial stage. However, an optimal range of subsidies exists, and when subsidies are higher than a certain threshold, government subsidy willingness fluctuations may lead to decreased stability. (3) There is a threshold of liquidated damages within ITISAs. Only when liquidated damages exceed the threshold can they facilitate the development of durable ITISAs and discourage free-rider behavior. The above findings can provide theoretical support for relevant government sectors when issuing policies to promote AGTIA and agricultural green development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1080 KiB  
Article
Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? From the Perspective of Production Factor Allocation
by Wei Yao, Yingyu Zhu, Shuyao Liu and Yan Zhang
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8425; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198425 - 27 Sep 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1345
Abstract
In the context of China’s large country with small farmers, agricultural socialized services are regarded as an important way for small farmers to organically connect with modern agriculture and provide ideas for improving agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP). Based on data from [...] Read more.
In the context of China’s large country with small farmers, agricultural socialized services are regarded as an important way for small farmers to organically connect with modern agriculture and provide ideas for improving agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP). Based on data from 1066 farmers from the China Land Economy Survey (CLES), this paper takes net carbon sink as the environmental output variable, adopts the Cobb–Douglas production function for stochastic frontier method estimation, and measures the AGTFP based on the stochastic frontier analysis method with an output-oriented distance function. At the same time, through the construction of intermediary effect and regulatory effect models, it empirically analyzes the impact and mechanism of agricultural socialized services on farmers’ AGTFP from the perspective of factor allocation. The study found that agricultural socialized services not only significantly promote AGTFP, but also that the effect of AGTFP improvement is more significant as the degree of participation in agricultural socialized services increases. The main results have passed a series of robustness tests. Further research found that agricultural socialized services promote the improvement of AGTFP through the intermediary role of improving the scale of farmland and the level of agricultural green technology adoption. Off-farm employment of the rural labor force has a positive regulatory effect between agricultural socialized services and AGTFP. Therefore, it is recommended to further play the role of agricultural socialized services in optimizing the allocation of production factors and to motivate agricultural socialized service organizations to provide multiple green production services for farmers through policy support or subsidies, enhance the service capacity of agricultural socialized service organizations, and provide precise services by fully considering the differences in the endowment of production factors among farmers, as well as take multiple measures and make solid and steady progress in promoting the sustainable development of agriculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Controlled Environment Agriculture for Sustainable Farming)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 504 KiB  
Article
Effects of Conservation Tillage on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in Black Soil Region: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China
by Mei Zhang, Hanye Zhang, Yun Deng and Chuanqi Yi
Land 2024, 13(8), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081212 - 6 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1823
Abstract
The implementation of conservation tillage is crucial for the preservation and utilization of black soil. This study examined 297 new agricultural management entities in five pilot counties in the black soil region of northeast China. Using the SBM-Undesirable model, this study measured and [...] Read more.
The implementation of conservation tillage is crucial for the preservation and utilization of black soil. This study examined 297 new agricultural management entities in five pilot counties in the black soil region of northeast China. Using the SBM-Undesirable model, this study measured and evaluated the agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP) of these entities. We further employed the Tobit model to explore the impact of conservation tillage on the AGTFP. The findings revealed that the average AGTFP value of the sample entities was 0.4364, indicating a generally low degree of AGTFP that exhibited significant variation. Improvement in input indicators (such as machinery) and undesirable output indicators (such as net carbon emissions) was particularly needed. Additionally, conservation tillage had a significant positive impact on AGTFP, with a higher number of applied technologies correlating with increased productivity. Material subsidies for conservation tillage offered greater direct cost relief and had a stronger positive effect on AGTFP in comparison with cash subsidies. Furthermore, apart from policy factors, key production and operation characteristics—such as access to agricultural materials—also significantly influenced AGTFP. The results of this study offer a valuable decision-making framework and scientific reference for countries in black soil regions worldwide, enabling them to enhance the conservation and sustainable utilization of this vital resource. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Use Policy and Food Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

41 pages, 7494 KiB  
Article
Synergies between Sustainable Farming, Green Technology, and Energy Policy for Carbon-Free Development
by Umar Daraz, Štefan Bojnec and Younas Khan
Agriculture 2024, 14(7), 1078; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071078 - 4 Jul 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1994
Abstract
This study addresses the integration of agricultural practices, technological innovations, and energy policies to achieve carbon neutrality in Mardan, Pakistan. A cross-sectional design was employed, collecting data from 400 stakeholders using stratified random sampling. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, structural equation [...] Read more.
This study addresses the integration of agricultural practices, technological innovations, and energy policies to achieve carbon neutrality in Mardan, Pakistan. A cross-sectional design was employed, collecting data from 400 stakeholders using stratified random sampling. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, structural equation modeling (SEM), Chi-square tests, and multiple regression analysis to explore the relationships between agricultural sustainability practices (ASPs), green technology implementation (GTI), energy policy measures (EPMs), and carbon-free development (CFD). The findings indicate strong positive correlations between ASPs, GTI, EPMs, and CFD, with a relatively high positive correlation coefficients. SEM path coefficients further confirmed the significant positive effects of ASPs on CFD. It is concluded that integrating sustainable farming practices, green technologies, and effective energy policies significantly advances carbon-free development in Mardan. Policymakers should prioritize promoting sustainable farming, investing in green technologies, and implementing robust energy policies with subsidies for renewable energy and carbon pricing mechanisms to foster carbon-neutral development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Energy Economics in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 236 KiB  
Essay
Empirical Research on Factors Influencing Chinese Farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies
by Xiaojuan Fan, Guanghui Meng and Qingming Zhang
Sustainability 2024, 16(13), 5657; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135657 - 2 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1773
Abstract
During a critical period of structural reform in China’s agricultural supply chain, accelerating the promotion and application of green production technologies emerges as a pivotal strategy to ensure the quality and safety of agricultural products while advancing agricultural modernization. This study empirically examines [...] Read more.
During a critical period of structural reform in China’s agricultural supply chain, accelerating the promotion and application of green production technologies emerges as a pivotal strategy to ensure the quality and safety of agricultural products while advancing agricultural modernization. This study empirically examines the factors influencing farmers’ adoption of green production technologies using an ordered logistic model based on survey data collected from 533 respondents in Shandong Province. The survey targeted regions where major economic crops such as corn and soybeans are cultivated, employing simple random sampling to ensure the data’s representativeness and reliability. The findings underscore several critical factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt green production technologies, including the presence of quality inspections, evaluations of restrictions on prohibited pesticide use, sales performance of green products, availability of government subsidies, and traceability of agricultural products. To foster greater adoption of green production technologies and propel the transformation of China’s agriculture, it is recommended to advocate and guide green agricultural practices, enhance green agricultural subsidy policies, and strengthen agricultural product market management systems. These measures are essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural development in China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Economic Transformation and Sustainable Development)
Back to TopTop