Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = first trimester sonography

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 272 KiB  
Article
Detection Rate of Fetal Anomalies in Early Mid-Trimester Compared to Late Mid-Trimester Detailed Scans: Possible Implications for First-Trimester Sonography
by Zangi Yehudit, Michaelson-Cohen Rachel, Weiss Ari, Shen Ori, Mazaki Eyal and Sela Hen Yitzhak
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5750; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195750 - 27 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2604
Abstract
Objective: A late mid-trimester fetal organ scan (lMTS) is recommended between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy. Evidence has been accumulating on the effectiveness of first-trimester anatomy scans. Early mid-trimester fetal scans (eMTSs; 14–17 weeks) may have the advantage of visualization of [...] Read more.
Objective: A late mid-trimester fetal organ scan (lMTS) is recommended between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy. Evidence has been accumulating on the effectiveness of first-trimester anatomy scans. Early mid-trimester fetal scans (eMTSs; 14–17 weeks) may have the advantage of visualization of most organs, hence allowing earlier genetic assessment and decision making. Our aim is to examine the effectiveness of eMTSs in identifying fetal anomalies compared to lMTSs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted based on data from the multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis clinic in a tertiary center. During the study period (2011–2021), an out-of-pocket eMTS in a community setting was offered routinely to the general population. Women who had previously undergone an eMTS and were later assessed due to a fetal anomaly in our clinic were included in the study. The cohort was divided into two groups according to whether the anomaly had been detected during the eMTS. We then compared the groups for factors that may be associated with anomaly detection in eMTSs. We used t-tests and chi-square tests, for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively, to determine variables related to eMTS anomaly detection, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Results: Of 1525 women assessed in our multidisciplinary clinic, 340 were included in the study. The anomaly detection rate of the eMTS compared to the lMTS was 59.1% The eMTS detection rates for specific organ systems were as follows: skeletal, 57%; cardiac, 52%; congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT), 44%; central nervous system, 32.4%; chest, 33%; and abdominal, 28%. In multivariate analysis, abnormal first-trimester screening (aOR 3.2; 95%CI 1.26–8.08) and multiple anomalies (aOR 1.86; 95%CI 1.02–3.37) were found to be associated with eMTS anomaly detection. Conclusions: The eMTS detection rate was nearly 60% and was most accurate in detecting skeletal, cardiac, and CAKUT anomalies. Since the eMTS was community-based, this rate likely reflects a “real-world” scenario. Our findings support consideration of performing an eMTS or first-trimester scan routinely for earlier diagnosis and decision making, as an adjunctive to lMTSs. Future studies will examine the cost-effectiveness of early scans. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on Maternal Fetal Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 471 KiB  
Article
Cytomegalovirus-Specific Hyperimmune Immunoglobulin Administration for Secondary Prevention after First-Trimester Maternal Primary Infection: A 13-Year Single-Center Cohort Study
by Emmanouil Karofylakis, Konstantinos Thomas, Dimitra Kavatha, Lamprini Galani, Sotirios Tsiodras, Helen Giamarellou, Vassiliki Papaevangelou and Anastasia Antoniadou
Viruses 2024, 16(8), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081241 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1463
Abstract
Primary cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy has a high risk of vertical transmission, with severe fetal sequelae mainly associated with first-trimester infections. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 IU/kg cytomegalovirus-specific hyperimmune globulin (HIG), used in first-trimester maternal primary infections for congenital infection prevention. [...] Read more.
Primary cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy has a high risk of vertical transmission, with severe fetal sequelae mainly associated with first-trimester infections. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 IU/kg cytomegalovirus-specific hyperimmune globulin (HIG), used in first-trimester maternal primary infections for congenital infection prevention. The primary outcome was vertical transmission, defined as neonatal viruria or positive amniocentesis if pregnancy was discontinued. HIG, initially administered monthly and since 2019 biweekly, was discontinued in negative amniocentesis cases. Women declining amniocentesis and positive amniocentesis cases with normal sonography were offered monthly HIG until delivery as a treatment strategy. The total transmission rate was 29.9% (32/107; 10 pregnancy terminations with positive amniocentesis, 18 completed pregnancies with positive amniocentesis and 4 declining amniocentesis). Maternal viremia was the only factor associated with fetal transmission (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.55–13.74). The transmission rate was not significantly different whether HIG was started during the first or second trimester (28.2% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.58), or between monthly and biweekly subgroups (25.7% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.193). Pre-treatment maternal viremia could inform decisions as a predictor of congenital infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection among Pediatric Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2717 KiB  
Article
Caesarean Section Scar and Placental Location at the First Trimester of Pregnancy—A Prospective Longitudinal Study
by Egle Savukyne, Mindaugas Kliucinskas, Laura Malakauskiene and Kristina Berskiene
Medicina 2024, 60(5), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050719 - 26 Apr 2024
Viewed by 2110
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aims to report the location of the placenta in the first trimester of pregnancy in groups of women according to the number of previous caesarean deliveries and the visibility of the caesarean scar niche. Materials and Methods: [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This study aims to report the location of the placenta in the first trimester of pregnancy in groups of women according to the number of previous caesarean deliveries and the visibility of the caesarean scar niche. Materials and Methods: The prospective observational research included adult women aged 18 to 41 years during pregnancy after one or more previous caesarean sections (CSs). Transvaginal (TVS) and transabdominal sonography (TAS) was used to examine the uterine scar and placental location during 11–14 weeks. The CS scar niche (“defect”) was bordered in the sagittal plane as a notch at the previous CS scar’s site with a depth of 2.0 mm or more. A comparative analysis of the placental location (high or low and anterior or posterior) was performed between groups of women according to the CS number and the CS scar niche. Results: A total of 122 participants were enrolled during the first-trimester screening. The CS scar defect (“niche”) was visible in 40.2% of cases. In cases after one previous CS, the placenta was low in the uterine cavity (anterior or posterior) at 77.4%, and after two or more CSs, it was at 67.9%. Comparing the two groups according to the CS scar niche, the placenta was low in 75.5% of cases in the participant group with a CS scar niche and in 75% of cases without a CS scar niche (p = 0.949). Conclusions: The number of previous caesarean deliveries has no effect on the incidence rate of low-lying placentas in the first trimester. Moreover, the presence of the CS scar niche is not associated with anterior low-lying placentas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1877 KiB  
Case Report
Body Stalk Anomaly Complicated by Ectopia Cordis: First-Trimester Diagnosis of Two Cases Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography
by Elisa Pappalardo, Ferdinando Antonio Gulino, Carla Ettore, Francesco Cannone and Giuseppe Ettore
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051896 - 27 Feb 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3263
Abstract
Introduction: Body stalk anomaly is a severe defect of the abdominal wall, characterized by the evisceration of abdominal organs and, in more severe cases, thoracic organs as well. The most serious condition in a body stalk anomaly may be complicated by ectopia cordis, [...] Read more.
Introduction: Body stalk anomaly is a severe defect of the abdominal wall, characterized by the evisceration of abdominal organs and, in more severe cases, thoracic organs as well. The most serious condition in a body stalk anomaly may be complicated by ectopia cordis, an abnormal location of the heart outside the thorax. The aim of this scientific work is to describe our experience with the prenatal diagnosis of ectopia cordis as part of the first-trimester sonographic screening for aneuploidy. Methods: We report two cases of body stalk anomalies complicated by ectopia cordis. The first case was identified during a first ultrasound examination at 9 weeks of gestation. The second was identified during an ultrasound examination at 13 weeks of gestation. Both of these cases were diagnosed using high-quality 2- and 3-dimensional ultrasonographic images obtained by the Realistic Vue and Crystal Vue techniques. The chorionic villus sampling showed that the fetal karyotype and CGH-array were both normal. Results: In our clinical case reports, the patients, immediately after the diagnosis of a body stalk anomaly complicated by ectopia cordis, opted for the termination of pregnancies. Conclusion: Performing an early diagnosis of a body stalk anomaly that is complicated by ectopia cordis is desirable, considering their poor prognoses. Most of the reported cases in the literature suggest that an early diagnosis can be made between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation. A combination of 2- and 3-dimensional sonography could allow an early diagnosis of body stalk anomalies complicated by ectopia cordis, particularly using new ultrasonographic techniques, the Realistic Vue and the Crystal Vue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Imaging Applications in Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 8871 KiB  
Article
Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
by Egle Savukyne, Egle Machtejeviene, Mindaugas Kliucinskas and Saulius Paskauskas
Medicina 2022, 58(3), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030407 - 9 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 16574
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in uterine scar thickness after previous cesarean delivery longitudinally during pregnancy, and to correlate cesarean section (CS) scar myometrial thickness in the first trimester in two participants groups (CS scar with [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in uterine scar thickness after previous cesarean delivery longitudinally during pregnancy, and to correlate cesarean section (CS) scar myometrial thickness in the first trimester in two participants groups (CS scar with a niche and CS scar without a niche) with the low uterine segment (LUS) myometrial thickness changes between the second and third trimesters. Materials and Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, pregnant women aged 18–41 years after at least one previous CS were included. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) was used to examine uterine scars after CS at 11–14 weeks. The CS scar niche (“defect”) was defined as an indentation at the site of the CS scar with a depth of at least 2 mm in the sagittal plane. Scar myometrial thickness was measured, and scars were classified subjectively as a scar with a niche (niche group) or without a niche (non-niche group). In the CS scar niche group, RMT (distance from the serosal surface of the uterus to the apex of the niche) was measured and presented as CS scar myometrial thickness in the first trimester. The myometrial thickness at the internal cervical os was measured in the non-niche group. The full LUS and myometrial LUS thickness at 18–20 and 32–35 weeks of gestation were measured in the thinnest part of the scar area using TVS. Friedman’s ANOVA test was used to analyse scar thickness during pregnancy and Mann–Whitney test to compare scar changes between CS scar niche and non-niche women groups. For a pairwise comparison in CS scar thickness measurements in the second and third trimesters, we used Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Results: A total of 122 eligible participants were recruited to the study during the first trimester of pregnancy. The scar niche was visible in 40.2% of cases. Uterine scar myometrial thickness decreases during pregnancy from 9.9 (IQR, 5.0–12.9) at the first trimester to 2.1 (IQR, 1.7–2.7) at the third trimester of pregnancy in the study population (p = 0.001). The myometrial CS scar thickness in the first trimester (over the niche) was thinner in the women’s group with CS scar niche compared with the non-niche group (at internal cervical os) (p < 0.001). The median difference between measurements in the CS scar niche group and non-niche group between the second and third trimester was 2.4 (IQR, 0.8–3.4) and 1.1 (IQR, 0.2–2.6) (p = 0.019), respectively. Myometrial LUS thickness as percentage decreases significantly between the second and third trimester in the CS scar niche group compared to the non-niche group (U = 1225; z = −2.438; p = 0.015). Conclusions: CS scar myometrial thickness changes throughout pregnancy and the appearance of the CS scar niche was associated with a more significant decrease in LUS myometrial thickness between the second and third trimesters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Risk Pregnancy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 7241 KiB  
Article
Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
by Egle Savukyne, Egle Machtejeviene, Saulius Paskauskas, Gitana Ramoniene and Ruta Jolanta Nadisauskiene
Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1091; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101091 - 12 Oct 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 7370
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of a Cesarean section (CS) scar niche during pregnancy, assessed by transvaginal ultrasound imaging, and to relate scar measurements, demographic and obstetric variables to the niche evolution and final pregnancy outcome. Materials and Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of a Cesarean section (CS) scar niche during pregnancy, assessed by transvaginal ultrasound imaging, and to relate scar measurements, demographic and obstetric variables to the niche evolution and final pregnancy outcome. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, we used transvaginal sonography to examine the uterine scars of 122 women at 11+0–13+6, 18+0–20+6 and 32+0–35+6 weeks of gestation. A scar was defined as visible on pregnant status when the area of hypoechogenic myometrial discontinuity of the lower uterine segment was identified. The CS scar niche (“defect”) was defined as an indentation at the site of the CS scar with a depth of at least 2 mm in the sagittal plane. We measured the hypoechogenic part of the CS niche in two dimensions, as myometrial thickness adjacent to the niche and the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). In the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, the full lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness and the myometrial layer thickness were measured at the thinnest part of the scar area. Two independent examiners measured CS scars in a non-selected subset of patients (n = 24). Descriptive analysis was used to assess scar visibility, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to show the strength of absolute agreement between two examiners for scar measurements. Factors associated with the CS scar niche, including maternal age, BMI, smoking status, previous vaginal delivery, obstetrics complications and a history of previous uterine curettage, were investigated. Clinical information about pregnancy outcomes and complications was obtained from the hospital’s electronic medical database. Results: The scar was visible in 77.9% of the women. Among those with a visible CS scar, the incidence of a CS scar niche was 51.6%. The intra- and interobserver agreement for CS scar niche measurements was excellent (ICC 0.98 and 0.89, respectively). Comparing subgroups of women in terms of CS scar niche (n = 49) and non-niche (n = 73), there was no statistically significant correlation between maternal age (p = 0.486), BMI (p = 0.529), gestational diabetes (p = 1.000), smoking status (p = 0.662), previous vaginal delivery after CS (p = 1.000) and niche development. Uterine scar niches were seen in 56.3% (18/48) of the women who had undergone uterine curettage, compared with 34.4% (31/74) without uterine curettage (p = 0.045). We observed an absence of correlation between the uterine scar niche at the first trimester of pregnancy and mode of delivery (p = 0.337). Two cases (4.7%) of uterine scar dehiscence were confirmed following a trial of vaginal delivery. Conclusions: Based on ultrasonography examination, the CS scar niche remained visible in half of the cases with a visible CS scar at the first trimester of pregnancy and could be reproducibly measured by a transvaginal scan. Previous uterine curettage was associated with an increased risk for uterine niche formation in a subsequent pregnancy. Uterine scar dehiscence might be potentially related to the CS scar niche. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment for Diseases Specific to Women)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3038 KiB  
Article
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Maternal Acute Adnexal Torsion during Pregnancy: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review
by Jong Hwa Lee, Hyun Jin Roh, Jun Woo Ahn, Jeong Sook Kim, Jin Young Choi, Soo-Jeong Lee and Sang Hun Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(7), 2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072209 - 13 Jul 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6094
Abstract
Background: For acute adnexal torsion of pregnant women, appropriate treatment based on an accurate diagnosis is especially important for fertility preservation and timely treatment. The 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee Opinion No. 723 announced its practice-changing guidelines to ensure [...] Read more.
Background: For acute adnexal torsion of pregnant women, appropriate treatment based on an accurate diagnosis is especially important for fertility preservation and timely treatment. The 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee Opinion No. 723 announced its practice-changing guidelines to ensure that diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted during the first trimester and gadolinium exposure at any time during pregnancy are safe for fetal stability. Unfortunately, few studies have been performed to evaluate the usefulness of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for acute adnexal torsion during pregnancy. Objective: We sought to determine the efficacy of diagnostic MRI modality using multiparameter for maternal adnexal torsion during pregnancy. Methods: From 1 January 2007 to 31 January 2019, 131 pregnant with MRI tests were reviewed. In this retrospective cohort study, 94 women were excluded due to conditions other than an adnexal mass, and 37 were identified through MRI analyses conducted before surgery for suspected adnexal torsion. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of sonography and MRI, and the secondary outcome was the usefulness of Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for predicting the severity of hemorrhagic infarction between the medulla and cortex of the torsed ovarian parenchyma. Results: Our study demonstrates that in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion during pregnancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value are 62.5%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 45.5% for sonography and 100%, 77.8%, 90.5%, and 100% for MRI. MRI results in surgical-proven adnexal torsion patients revealed unilocular ovarian cysts (36.8% (7/19)), multilocular ovarian cysts (31.6% (6/19)), and near normal-appearing ovaries (31.6% (6/19)). Pathology in adnexal torsion revealed a corpus luteal ovarian cyst (63.2% (12/19)) and underlying adnexal pathology (46.8% (7/19)). Maternal adnexal torsion during pregnancy was more likely to occur in corpus luteal ovarian cysts than in underlying adnexal masses (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.428–10.738). MRI features for adnexal torsion were as follows: tubal wall thickness, 100% (19/19); ovarian stromal (medullary) edema, 100% (19/19); symmetrical or asymmetrical ovarian cystic wall, 100%(19/19); prominent follicles in the ovarian parenchyma periphery, 57.9% (11/19); periadenxal fat stranding, 84.2% (16/19); uterine deviation to the twisted side, 21.1% (4/19); and peritoneal fluid, 42.1% (8/19). The signal intensity of the ADC values of the ovarian medulla and cortex were compared between the cystectomy and detorsion (CD) and salpingo-oophorectomy (SO) groups. The ADC values of the CD and SO groups were 1.81 ± 0.09 × 10−3 mm2/s and 1.91 ± 0.18 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively (P = 0.209), in the ovarian medulla and 1.37 ± 0.32 × 10−3 mm2/s and 0.96 ± 0.36 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively (P = 0.022), in the ovarian cortex. The optimal cut-off value of ADC values for predictable total necrosis in the torsed ovarian cortex was ≤ 1.31 × 10−3 mm2/s (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.81; 95% CI 0.611–1.0; P = 0.028). Conclusion: Our data showed that maternal adnexal torsion during pregnancy occurred in most corpus luteal cystic ovary cases and some normal-appearing ovary during the 1st and 2nd trimesters of gestation. Therefore, this study is the first study to elaborate on the existence or usefulness of the diagnostic MRI for acute maternal adnexal torsion during pregnancy and to provide a predictive diagnosis of the severity of hemorrhagic infarction for deciding surgical radicality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Prospects for Prenatal Diagnosis and Fetal Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 663 KiB  
Review
First Trimester Ultrasound in Prenatal Diagnosis—Part of the Turning Pyramid of Prenatal Care
by Ran Neiger
J. Clin. Med. 2014, 3(3), 986-996; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030986 - 5 Sep 2014
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 10753
Abstract
First-trimester sonographic assessment of the risk of chromosomal abnormalities is routinely performed throughout the world, primarily by measuring fetal nuchal translucency thickness between 11–13 weeks’ gestation, combined with assessment of serum markers. The development of high-frequency transvaginal transducers has led to improved ultrasound [...] Read more.
First-trimester sonographic assessment of the risk of chromosomal abnormalities is routinely performed throughout the world, primarily by measuring fetal nuchal translucency thickness between 11–13 weeks’ gestation, combined with assessment of serum markers. The development of high-frequency transvaginal transducers has led to improved ultrasound resolution and better visualization of fetal anatomy during the first-trimester. Continuous improvement in ultrasound technology allows a thorough detailed assessment of fetal anatomy at the time of the nuchal translucency study. Using transabdominal or transvaginal sonography, or a combination of both approaches, it is now possible to diagnose a wide range of fetal anomalies during the first trimester. Multiple studies reported early diagnosis of major fetal anomalies after demonstrating the association of increased nuchal translucency thickness with structural defect in chromosomally normal and abnormal fetuses. Normal sonographic findings provide reassurance for women at high risk while detection of fetal malformation during the first trimester enables discussion and decisions about possible treatments and interventions, including termination of pregnancy, during an early stage of pregnancy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis-Part 1)
Back to TopTop