Search Results (63)

The recommended treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 stages IA–IB2 and selected IIA1) is surgery, followed by either observation or adjuvant therapy, based on individual risk factors. Surgical management has evolved from extensive radical procedures to more conservative strategies, allowing for fertility-preserving options in appropriately selected patients. In 2018, a landmark study (LACC trial) evaluated the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy, comparing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. The results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery was associated with worse disease-free and overall survival, leading to guidelines changes that recommend the open radical hysterectomy as the new standard of care. More recently, results from the prospective randomized SHAPE trial demonstrated that in well-selected patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, recurrence rates are comparable between simple hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy. An ongoing study, the CONTESSA trial, is evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of fertility preservation for lesions measuring 2–4 cm. In addition, ongoing studies are evaluating different surgical approaches for both simple hysterectomy (LASH trial) and radical hysterectomy (ROCC/GOG-3043 and RACC trials), with a focus on comparing oncologic outcomes. Attention has also turned to refining lymph node assessment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a standard staging strategy with reduced morbidity. The SENTICOL I-II and SENTIX/ENGOT-Cx2 trials support its safety and diagnostic accuracy in early-stage disease. This article offers a comprehensive overview of recently published prospective trials that have shaped clinical practice in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. It focuses on surgical approaches and radicality, the role of sentinel lymph node mapping, and fertility-sparing treatments. The review further draws attention to ongoing investigations and novel studies that may influence future directions in the field. Full article

The assessment of the ovarian reserve is important in patients with fertility intent. The anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum level is a useful ovarian reserve marker. Endometriosis is a benign disease with three phenotypes: superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep endometriosis (DE). Endometriosis is linked with infertility; however, the exact impact of endometriosis and endometriosis surgery on AMH levels is less clear. This narrative review examines how different endometriosis phenotypes and related surgeries affect AMH levels as well as explores whether pre- and post-surgical AMH can predict the reproductive outcomes in women seeking pregnancy. The evidence suggests that OMA is linked to reduced AMH values and a higher AMH decline rate over time. OMA cystectomy causes further a reduction in AMH, which, however, tends to recover postoperatively. Non-excisional surgery for OMA spares the ovarian parenchyma; however, an at least temporary decline in AMH is observed. The effect is likely smaller than that of cystectomy. Non-thermal methods of hemostasis following cystectomy are likely superior in terms of AMH. The AMH levels before OMA cystectomy appear to be positively correlated with the postoperative probability of pregnancy, particularly spontaneous conception, but not livebirth rates. Preoperative AMH levels are also predictive of the risk of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Similarly, postoperative AMH levels and the rate of AMH decline at 1 year after OMA cystectomy appear to be predictive of fertility outcomes. SUP likely has little (if any) impact on AMH levels. DE reduces AMH levels, and a further reduction following surgery is anticipated. However, a reduction in AMH values should not be interpreted as a decline in the patient’s reproductive potential. Further research should focus on the extra-ovarian locations of endometriosis and their impact on AMH values. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare and biologically distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, typically presenting at an early stage in younger women. Unlike high-grade serous carcinoma, MOC is characterized by unique molecular features—including frequent KRAS mutations and HER2 amplifications—and exhibits limited sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. These differences highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies guided by molecular and histological profiling. This review aims to integrate current evidence on the clinical management of MOC with emerging insights into its molecular biology, with a focus on how these factors influence surgical decision-making, fertility preservation, and adjuvant therapy selection. Methods: We performed a comprehensive narrative review of the literature, synthesizing findings from retrospective cohorts, molecular studies, and clinical guidelines relevant to the surgical, reproductive, and therapeutic management of MOC. Results: Histologic subtype—expansile versus infiltrative—plays a critical role in guiding lymphadenectomy as lymph node metastases are rare (<1%) in expansile tumors but occur in up to 23% of infiltrative cases. Complete surgical staging remains essential for accurate prognostication, yet tailored approaches may reduce overtreatment in low-risk patients. Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) appears safe in FIGO stage IA expansile MOC, with favorable reproductive outcomes, while higher-stage or infiltrative cases warrant caution. Given MOC’s chemoresistance, the role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage disease remains debated. Targeted strategies, including MEK inhibitors and HER2-directed therapies, are under investigation and may benefit selected molecular subgroups. Conclusions: MOC requires a nuanced, biomarker-informed approach. This review advocates for personalized, evidence-based management supported by multidisciplinary evaluation while underscoring the urgent need for prospective studies and biomarker-driven clinical trials. Full article

Background: Tumor recurrence significantly impacts the quality of life and fertility of patients with serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOT) and early-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). This study aims to characterize recurrence patterns, identify independent risk factors for recurrence, and develop a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study to investigate recurrence in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and radical surgery (RS). Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to identify risk factors. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to evaluate RFS. A nomogram was developed based on identified variables to predict RFS. Results: Tumor capsule disruption and micropapillary were associated with higher recurrence risk in the FSS group. Non-invasive implants were associated with higher recurrence risk in the RS group. The nomogram prediction model was developed based on identified risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) for RFS predictions was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62–0.85) at 3 years and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67–0.89) at 5 years for the FSS group and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76–0.98) at 3 years and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65–0.97) at 5 years for the RS group. Conclusions: We identified the risk factors for recurrence of SBOT and early-stage LGSOC following FSS and RS procedures and developed a predictive model for forecasting RFS. This model provides valuable guidance for patients and clinicians in predicting recurrence risk for patients. Full article

Background: Nowadays, there is an increasing desire among women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to choose a uterus-sparing surgical treatment in order to preserve their fertility. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess how pregnancy and delivery affect the recurrence of POP in women who had previously undergone laparoscopic hysteropexy as well as to improve and individualise the future counselling of patients of reproductive age desiring uterine-preserving treatment for POP. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus databases for articles published until January 2025, without previous historical limits. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: hysteropexy, pregnancy, laparoscopy, and prolapse. Results: A total of ten case reports and three case series met the inclusion criteria for the review, comprising 26 patients. All authors used laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (LSHP) for the treatment of POP. All patients underwent caesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 38 weeks. Over a mean follow-up period of 9 months, only 4% of patients developed a recurrent uterine prolapse. A total of 8% of the patients developed de novo anterior compartment prolapse, 8% developed a recurrence of anterior compartment prolapse, and 4% developed posterior compartment prolapse. Conclusions: LSHP seems to be a safe option for women of reproductive age with incomplete family planning, as it does not seem to negatively impact foetal growth. Pregnancy does not appear to affect the long-term efficacy of hysteropexy in maintaining apical support. Given the limited data on the safety and efficacy of uterine-sparing surgery for POP followed by a subsequent pregnancy, further evidence is of great importance towards evaluating safety, efficacy, and providing better counselling for women. Full article

Background/Objectives: Due to the rarity and histological heterogeneity of non-epithelial ovarian cancers (NEOCs), monitoring their reproductive and oncological outcomes is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with NEOCs treated with fertility-sparing surgery over the past 10 years at our tertiary referral university clinic. Methods: This retrospective study included all the NEOC patients diagnosed and treated with fertility-sparing surgery from 2010 to 2019. The patient demographic and clinical characteristics; data regarding the treatment andthe clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings during follow-up; and disease recurrences were recorded. In this study, the recurrence-free survival and the overall survival were the oncological outcomes. The reproductive outcomes were assessed as attempting and achieving pregnancy. Results: This study included 39 patients. The most frequent NEOCs were granulosa cell tumors (53.8%). The majority of the tumors were in the IA or IC1 stage. The initial therapy was generally a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (30.8%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 48.7% of the patients. An NEOC recurrence was registered in 25.6% of the patients, mostly during the first two postoperative years. The recurrence-free survival was 76.92%. A regression analysis showed that amore advanced stage of NEOC was the most important predictor of disease recurrence. The overall survival rate was 87.2%, with a mean time to an adverse outcome of 23.01 +/−10.68 months. The regression analysis showed that better survival depended mostly on not having disease recurrence. After treatment, ten patients tried to conceive and seven succeeded. All the children were in good condition upon birth. Conclusions: Fertility-sparing treatment for NEOCs was proven as a safe and successful option in terms of both oncological and reproductive outcomes. Full article

Background: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are a unique subset of epithelial ovarian neoplasms characterised by atypical epithelial proliferation without stromal invasion. BOTs are typically diagnosed at an early stage, primarily affect women of reproductive age, and have a favourable prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes of BOTs in a North East London cohort. Methods: A retrospective, multicentric analysis was conducted on 69 patients with histologically confirmed BOTs managed between January 2018 and December 2022 across the Barts Health NHS Trust hospitals. Clinical and demographic data, surgical details, histopathological findings, and recurrence rates were analysed. We used descriptive and exploratory statistical methods. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 44 years, with 46.37% under 40, including 18 nulliparous women. Most tumours (91.3%) were FIGO stage I, with mucinous histology predominating (56.52%), followed by serous BOTs (27.53%). Ultrasound and MRI demonstrated 65.45% and 81.5% sensitivities for borderline or malignant features, respectively. Surgical approaches included open surgery (75.4%), laparoscopy (17.4%), and robotic-assisted procedures (2.9%). Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) was performed in all nulliparous women under 40 years of age. Recurrence occurred in 2 cases, both in patients with prior FSS performed over a decade earlier. Conclusions: FSS is a viable option for young women, especially if nulliparous and under the age of 40, with recurrence rates comparable to radical procedures. Most patients were diagnosed early (FIGO I) with excellent prognoses. MRI proved most sensitive for diagnosis, while long-term follow-up with transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 monitoring is crucial for detecting recurrences. Full article

Background/Objectives: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a standard practice for managing early stage cervical cancer, yet significant variation exists in clinical approaches worldwide. Our objective was to ascertain current practices and preferences for cerclage use among expert centers globally regarding FSS in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2023 involving expert centers identified through their scientific contributions and participation in international workgroups and conferences.. The survey, comprising 27 questions, evaluated existing practices in FSS. Results: Out of the centers surveyed, 21 (36.2%) gynecologic oncologists responded. For tumors <2 cm, 86% of centers preferred radical trachelectomy, primarily via the vaginal approach, while 13.6% favored a simple trachelectomy. Three experts preferred simple trachelectomy (13.6%). For tumors >2 cm, 47.6% utilized neoadjuvant chemotherapy before trachelectomy. Others did not offer FSS or performed an abdominal radical trachelectomy. Over time, there has been a shift towards less radical surgeries for tumors <2 cm and increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for larger tumors. Some abandoned the minimally invasive surgical approach. Nearly all experts (90.5%) placed a cerclage immediately following trachelectomy. Conclusions: The majority of experts opt for radical trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer, with immediate cerclage placement being a common practice. However, considerable international variations highlight the urgent need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize treatment strategies, balancing oncological safety with fertility outcomes. Full article

The standard treatment for cervical tumors larger than 4 cm, known as bulky tumors, currently involves concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy. However, radical surgery is an alternative option in some cases, particularly for those in which a combination of risk factors is not anticipated. Recent studies show that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may help reduce tumor size in these bulky tumors, enabling subsequent surgical intervention reducing the adverse effects derived from radiotherapy. Evidence about fertility sparing surgery in patients with bulky tumors is limited, although some retrospective studies reported good oncological outcomes when adequate tumor reduction is achieved through neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical surgery in patients with tumor sizes ≥ 4 cm in the final pathological report, combined with other intermediate risk factors for recurrence, remains a topic of debate. Current evidence indicates no significant differences in overall survival or disease-free survival between follow-up alone and the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in these cases, although further research is needed to refine treatment strategies for these patients. This narrative review aims to summarize the available evidence on the comprehensive management of bulky cervical tumors, addressing relevant issues and controversies in the field. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are a rare diagnosis, especially in the adolescent population. This can make initial management and surveillance strategies difficult, given the limited guidelines and experience in this young age group. Case Presentation: We present two cases of recurrent serous BOTs diagnosed in adolescent patients. Both patients were initially treated with fertility-sparing surgery and followed with transabdominal pelvic ultrasounds. Secondary surgical debulking of recurrent disease with uterine preservation was successful in both patients with a long-term disease-free status. Conclusions: Although rare, BOTs can occur in adolescent patients and should be on the differential for ovarian masses in this age group. Fertility-sparing surgical techniques, reproductive endocrinology consultation, surveillance strategies, and hormone replacement therapy should all be taken into consideration when treating adolescent patients with BOTs. Full article

Bowel endometriosis is a complex condition predominantly impacting women in their reproductive years, which may lead to chronic pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and infertility. This review highlights current approaches to the diagnosis and management of bowel endometriosis, emphasizing a multidisciplinary strategy. Diagnostic methods include detailed patient history, physical examination, and imaging techniques like transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which aid in preoperative planning. Management options range from hormonal therapies for symptom relief to minimally invasive surgical techniques. Surgical interventions, categorized as shaving excision, disc excision, or segmental resection, depend on factors such as lesion size, location, and depth. Shaving excision is preferred for its minimal invasiveness and lower complication rates, while segmental resection is reserved for severe cases. This review also explores nerve-sparing strategies to reduce surgical morbidity, particularly for deep infiltrative cases close to the rectal bulb, anal verge, and rectosigmoid colon. A structured, evidence-based approach is recommended, prioritizing conservative surgery to avoid complications and preserve fertility as much as possible. Comprehensive management of bowel endometriosis requires expertise from both gynecologic and gastrointestinal specialists, aiming to improve patient outcomes while minimizing long-term morbidity. Full article

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality in women of reproductive age. In recent years, the development of preventive and therapeutic strategies has significantly increased survival rates. While this represents an important medical achievement, it has also raised a major social issue regarding the need to ensure an adequate quality of life for surviving patients. Many of these women are left without their reproductive capacity at an age when their desire for motherhood has not yet been fulfilled. Infertility or subfertility in cancer survivors is actually a growing problem, complicated by the current trend of increasingly delaying pregnancy. The psychological effects of this issue can be devastating, sometimes even more so than the cancer diagnosis itself. Although today fertility-sparing surgeries can ensure excellent reproductive outcomes with minimal oncological risk, obstetric sequelae remain significant, and affected women often require specialized care pathways. Additionally, adequate counselling is still not provided to all patients who cannot access fertility-sparing treatments and who find themselves without hope. Reproductive medicine is therefore facing the modern challenge of offering concrete options to help these patients realize their desire for motherhood. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the therapeutic options available to young women facing an early- or later-stage diagnosis of cervical cancer. Full article

Endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) is a premalignant condition with a substantial risk of progression to endometrial cancer (EC), with the endometrioid subtype being the most common. EAH is characterized by abnormal endometrial gland proliferation and cellular atypia, often resulting from prolonged unopposed estrogen exposure. This review aims to explore the clinical significance of EAH, its risk of progression to EC, and the current approaches to management. The risk of EAH progressing to EC ranges from 20 to 50%, influenced by factors such as histopathology and genetic mutations including PTEN and KRAS. Key risk factors include obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, and postmenopausal status. Abnormal uterine bleeding is a hallmark symptom of EAH and early-stage EC, necessitating diagnostic evaluation through endometrial biopsy and transvaginal ultrasonography. Therapeutic management strategies depend on patient risk and fertility considerations. Hormonal therapy, particularly progestins, is the mainstay for fertility preservation, while hysterectomy is preferred for higher-risk patients. Regular monitoring with biopsies is essential for those undergoing conservative treatment. Recent advancements in the management of EAH and EC have shifted towards incorporation of molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies, enabling better risk stratification and individualized care. Biomarkers and minimally invasive surgical techniques are emerging as promising approaches in improving outcomes for women with EAH. This review underscores the importance of early diagnosis and personalized management in preventing the progression of EAH to EC, highlighting current clinical practices and potential future developments in this field. Full article

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable malignancy of the uterine cervix. The tendencies in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality have remained similar for the past decade, albeit with increasing frequency in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Moreover, in the majority of LMICs, cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death among reproductive-age women. High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections have been proven to be associated with up to 95% of cervical cancer cases, with HPV-16 and HPV-18 types being responsible for approximately 70% of all cervical cancers, with the other high-risk HPV types accounting for up to a further 25%. More recently, the latest data appear to confirm there is a change in the frequency of HR-HPV occurrence, especially HPV-16 and HPV-18, as a reflection of the implementation of preventive vaccination programs. Owing to the growing incidence of cervical cancer among reproductive-age women and with the development of cancer management approaches, fertility-sparing options have been proposed for early-stage cervical cancer management as an option for young women, especially those with unaccomplished reproductive desires. However, methods applied for this purpose (cold-knife conization, loop electrosurgical excision, trachelectomy) have variable outcomes and do not prevent risks of relapse. Multiple factors are involved in cervical cancer recurrence, even in cases treated at the early stage of the disease. In this review, the authors unveil whether HPV infection and virus type could be one of the key factors associated with cervical cancer recurrence after fertility-sparing surgery. Reviews of the literature reveal that recurrent and persistent HR-HPV infection is a strong predictor of cervical lesions’ relapse. In particular, HPV-16 and HPV-18 infections and their persistence have been reported to be associated with cervical cancer recurrence. HR-HPV genotyping before and after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer could facilitate a personalized approach and improve the overall survival rate. Screening for HR-HPV is essential during the follow-up of cervical cancer-treated women and will help to predict possible cancer recurrence. Full article

Background/Objectives: With growing survival rates for Adolescent and Young Adults (AYAs) diagnosed with gynecological cancer, the focus shifted to Quality of Life (QoL). Fertility-sparing surgery offers a viable alternative to standard, usually fertility-impairing treatments. Treatment choice remains difficult and renders perspectives of AYAs on decision-making and psychological outcomes afterwards. This review examines the impact of (in)fertility on psychological well-being both during cancer treatment, and in the long term. Methods: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted by searching Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Trial database and PsycINFO on 30 November 2023. The review included studies with a focus on gynecological cancer, fertility and pregnancy related psychological outcomes, QoL, and psychosocial factors influencing decision-making. Case reports and reviews were excluded. Quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: 15 studies, published between 2005 and 2023, involving 1328 participants, were included. Key findings highlight the significance of informing all AYAs about cancer treatment effects on fertility and discussing fertility preservation options. Feeling time-pressured and conflicted between choosing the best oncological outcomes and preserving fertility were common. Factors such as younger age at diagnosis, time pressure, and inadequate counseling by healthcare workers increased reproductive concerns which contributed to long term psychological distress. Research on AYAs with gynecological cancer without fertility preservation possibilities is limited and should be prioritized. Conclusions: This review shows that both Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and follow-up processes can be improved by addressing fertility-related questions and concerns, therefore increasing long-term QoL. This review is registered in PROSPERO (ID 448119). Full article